ProjNet_questions_AF_7_final.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: Air Force Phase 7 Review: ProjNet Q&A (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 47 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec 6611115 Other RFP Scope Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide the Scope of Work to be performed.

On: Jul 25 2016.

Government Response. . PWS is attachment 1 in RFP. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6611273 Security pg75 Factor 1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify the Security Clearance requirement, which agency and type.

On: Jul 25 2016.

Government Response. . Refer to PWS Appendix D, Paragraph 14, Individual Clearance. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6611642 Fire Protection/Life Safety 3.4.19 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS States "ITM tasks shall not be performed for building level fire protection systems as part of scheduled maintenance, but may be performed through service orders."

Does this mean fuels labs will be covered under a service order?

On: Jul 25 2016.

Government Response. . Any fire protection systems that are dedicated to the fuel systems and equipment should be included in the FFP. This includes fire protection equipment in the fuel lab. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6611645 Mechanical 3.2.4.4 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS states "Maintenance work on ball valves shall occur during repairs or when requested to do so by the fuels activity that operates the petroleum systems." Will request be via Service Order?

On: Jul 25 2016.

Government Response. . Yes, work beyond inspecting for proper operation and lubricating operators shall be performed via service order. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6611647 Mechanical 3.2.4.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS states "Adjust packing and maintain operators per manufacturer's specifications" Will packing be addressed via service order?

On: Jul 25 2016.

Government Response. . No. RM for packing for small valves that can be handled manually (i.e., without a crane) should be included in the FFP. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6611649 Construction Management PWS 1.10.6.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

8/10/2016ProjNet: Logged In User

5th paragraph states "The contractor shall accommodate each site's existing recurring maintenance schedule when preparing the schedule for this task order."

When will these schedules be provided to the MRR contractor?

On: Jul 25 2016.

Government Response. . Per 1.10.6.1, it is the contractor's responsibility to coordinate the maintenance schedule with the QAE for each site. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6611653 Electrical PWS 3.4.22 Back-up Power Generators Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Back-up Power Generators States "Backup power generators shall be maintained, annually, in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines" Can additional detail be provided to define this requirement? Will fluids, belts, filters, etc be replaced via service order?

On: Jul 25 2016.

Government Response. . All available information has been provided. Consumables such as fluids, belts, filters, etc., are to be included in the recurring maintenance. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612403 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 3.4.22 Back-up Power Generators - Backup power generators shall be maintained, annually, in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines.

We have found other contractors or Government employees already perform Monthly and Annual run-ups on these systems. Is it the Government's intention to duplicate this work in these cases?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . It is not the government's intention to duplicate this work, however the contractor should bid in accordance with the requirements of the PWS. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612406 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 3.3.6.1.1 High Level Shut-Off Valve (HLSO) (124AF) - When the tank is being filled, check for proper operation of the HLSO valve.

How is this work annotated if the tanks cannot receive fuel during the RM visit?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . If possible, the HLSO shall be checked for operation during fueling. Otherwise, contractor could manually lift a float valve or cover a sensor to check the HLSO or other alternate means of testing as listed in the O&M manual. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612409 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 3.4.1 Tank Gauges - Inspect and check tank gauges in bulk storage areas for any accumulation of moisture in the head gauge reading housing. Remove moisture, if found. Observe the reading for any errors in measurement. The Contractor shall calibrate, inspect, and test the gauges as required. Adjust gauges as required. The Contractor shall develop and maintain standard calibration records to be used throughout the period of this contract, with a file copy maintained at each facility. Recommend repairs through a service" order.

Does this refer to only the mechanical gauges associated with the storage tanks or does it also include ATG equipment?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . This refers to mechanical gauges. Any work on ATGs will be done by service order. On: Aug 02 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612418 General PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

REPOST OF 6612409

3.4.1 Tank Gauges - Inspect and check tank gauges in bulk storage areas for any accumulation of moisture in the head gauge reading housing. Remove moisture, if found. Observe the reading for any errors in measurement. The Contractor shall calibrate, inspect, and test the gauges as required. Adjust gauges as required. The Contractor shall develop and maintain standard calibration records to be used throughout the period of this contract, with a file copy maintained at each facility. Recommend repairs through a service" order.

Does this refer to only the mechanical gauges associated with the storage tanks or does it also include ATG equipment?

Effort to "remove moisture" and "calibrate" tank gauges are somewhat invasive actions requiring disassembly of components and in some instances, access to the top of tank floating pan (permit required confined space). Request the government revise this PWS element to read "gauges shall be inspected any checked, any calibration or repairs will be done via Service Order."

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . This refers to mechanical gauges. ATG work will be done by service order. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612480 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 3.4.14 Static Ground Rods - One time resistance test of all static ground rods shall be performed annually and all resistance values recorded.

Is this recording just a stencil record at the ground point itself to is it recorded as part of the written report only?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . Per PWS paragraph 3.0, maintenance, repair, inspection, and testing results shall be electronically and manually recorded and maintained in permanent facility files. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612485 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 3.2.18 Quarterly Fire Protection System Maintenance – Does this paragraph refer only to facility installed systems or does it extend to portable or non-mounted systems as well?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . Portable fire protection equipment is not included. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612487 General Proposal Submission Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify the number of proposal copies we are to submit.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . Page 67 is correct. The Instructions to Offerors has been updated with Amendment 1. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612489 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Section 3.0: Contractor cost associated with the requirement to inspect, assess, repair, and maintain will be significantly higher in permit required confined spaces. Can the government provide a list of confined spaces at the facilities listed in Appendices H and I?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . No additional information is available at this time. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612490 Other Completion Time Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Would the government consider extending the completion date for the projects being submitted as Past Performance to 5 years preceding the closing date of this solicitation?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . No, the requirement stands as stated. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612492 General RFP Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Because there are concurrent RFPs, is it acceptable to propose the same key personnel for each proposal? Upon award of any contract, we will propose different individuals in order for the personnel to be dedicated specifically to a single Task Order.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . Yes, however, those individuals must be submitted for approval if replaced. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612496 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Section 1.10.3 Maintenance Records: Define what items should be considered as are included as "equipment". There are multiple references to "equipment" throughout the PWS that impact contractor level of effort; a definition is required to properly cost services.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . Equipment is defined as tangible property other than land or buildings that comprises a petroleum system. Per the PWS 1.2, A petroleum system is defined as an underground or above ground storage tank, connected piping, ancillary equipment and appurtenances, and containment system, if any. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612498 Other Proposal Submission Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify whether or not we are to submit new PPQ's using Attachment 03. will previously completed PPQ's be accepted?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . See Pg 78 of the RFP which states "Offers shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously .."

Yes, submit new PPQs by Attachment 03. Yes, previously completed PPQs will be accepted as long as they are submitted on Attachment 3 provided as an attachment to this specific RFP. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612499 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Section 3.2.17 Automatic Control Valves: If adjustment of control valves is required, please confirm their adjustment (more time consuming than functional check) is to be done via Service Order.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . Adjustment of Automatic Control Valves shall be done as recurring maintenance. On: Aug 02 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612503 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Appendix A, Section 1.3 Not to Exceed Service Orders: This section references a $10,000 limit to NTE Service Orders. This contradicts other related references indicating NTE Service Order max will be at the KO's discretion. Please clarify.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . NTE service orders should typically be limited to $10,000. Allowing service orders to exceed $10,000 will be at the Contracting Officer's discretion and will be on a case by case basis. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612506 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Appendix E, Submittal Procedures, Section 1.5 review Period Table: For the Monthly Report, the text reads "On or before the 10th day of the following month (e.g., January maintenance report is due by Feb 10)" Please confirm this should read monthly report and not maintenance report.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The example given should read monthly report instead of maintenance report. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612509 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Monthly Report, Attachment 3: Recurring maintenance reports can be lengthy (greater than 25 pages each). Is it the government's intent that these reports be submitted in their entirety in the monthly reports? Estimating 15 installations visited during a month, with a minimum of 25 pages each report, this will add 375 pages to the monthly report.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . Attachment 3 provides the Maintenance Report template and is separate from the Monthly report template, which is Attachment 2. Maintenance reports shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of the PWS.

RM reports are due 30 days after the RM visit. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612514 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Monthly Report, Section 1 includes a Table with a footnote "Every SO submitted during this period shall be included in this table."

Should this table include all SOs, including SOs submitted during previous months? For routine SOs, it can take several days after submission to receive NTP, and then 30 days to complete. So for SOs submitted near the end of the month, most of the table will be blank (NTP date, Completed Date, # days to complete, etc). The status of service orders not complete seems to be missing from the monthly report requirements.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The table should identify any active service orders (initiated, submitted, approved, etc.) and any service orders completed or disapproved during the period covered by the monthly report. Format of monthly report will be clarified at post award meeting. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612520 General RFP Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP, Page 40 states Factor I - 12 pages single sided or 6 double sided pages and Factor II - 10 pages single sided or 5 double sided pages. Page 46 states the combined technical proposal...no longer than TEN(11) typewritten pages front and back or twenty (22) pages one sided. Please confirm total of 11 double-sided and not 10 for the Technical Proposal

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . Yes, page 46 should state 11 double-sided pages for the Technical Proposal. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612523 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The equipment list does not contain Buckley AFB Site 1 ANG (BCK) and Minneapolis-St Paul Site 1 ANG (MGD). Will the government please list the equipment in order to provide accurate pricing?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . BCK, MGD, and FCH are Air National Guard sites. The real property for these sites are rolled up under the adjoining Active Air Force sites. BCK equipment is rolled up under BKY; MGD equipment is rolled up under SPL;

and FCH equipment is rolled up under FAI. Both the ANG site and the Active AF site have the same DOD site code. They also have the same RM frequency. There is no equipment missing from the infrastructure list. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612525 General RFP and PWS

Page 37 of the RFP states that "Contractor must provide full performance at one site within 21 days...". Page 4, paragraph 1.2.4 of the PWS states that "The contractor shall have performance in place at a minimum of one site within 30 calendar days...". Please clarify.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . PWS is correct. Please see RFP Amendment 01. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612579 General page 37 RFP Section 4(a) Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the instruction to submit "A completed and signed copy of the solicitation, and all solicitation amendments..." mean that CEHNC desires all 130 pages of the solicitation plus the ~107 pages of attachments (~237 pages total) to be included somewhere within offerors' proposals, or does CEHNC desire only the SF1449 (pages 1 through 23) plus any potential SF30 addendum acknowledgement pages to be included within Tab A of the Volume II Factor IV Price?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . No - cover page 1449 of solicitation and any amendments. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612581 General page 42 RFP Section 1.a)b) Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that offerors are required to include only resumes of the Project Manager, Quality Control Manager, Safety Manager, and Project Engineer within the proposal and that resumes for the SSHO, Safety Competent Qualified Individual, and Site Supervisor are not required until after award with submission of the Quality Control Plan.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . That is correct. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612583 General Attachment 01 Contract Binder PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The PWS provided in the RFP does not include the necessary quantities at each location in order to provide quarterly, semi-annual and annual pricing. Please provide the missing data for each facility (pump quantities, valves, pipe lengths, tank sizes, etc.).

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . All available information has been provided. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612586 General page 6 Attachment 01 Contract Binder, PWS Section 1.5

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 1.5.1, 1.5.2, and 1.5.4 state that the contractor has to provide three positions as TO-specific with no other duties: PM, QCM, and Safety Manager. Does the government intend for offerors to provide fully burdened rates in this pricing proposal for 2,080 hours for each of these three positions?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The PWS requirement is that the Offeror provide these three separate and distinct full time positions (three positions equal three separate people) and that they have no other duties outside this task order. It is the Offeror's responsibility to determine their approach for pricing this requirement. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612591 General page 9 Attachment 01 Contract Binder, PWS Section 1.7.3

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please specify when the Post Award Conference is expected to be held in Huntsville. Paragraph 1.2.5 states the first Site Visit is expected to take place within 7 days of award. Is the Post Award Conference expected to be held before the first site visit?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . Post Award conference will be scheduled prior to the first site visit. Per 1.2.5 the contractor shall assume that the first kickoff visit will occur 7 calendar days after task order notice to proceed -- the government will setup the kickoff visits which is dependent on installation availability. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612603 General Attachment 01 Contract Binder, PWS Appendix A 3.4 Response and Completion

Times Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This section states that Routine SO Completion will be completed within 30 Calendar Days. The majority of the sites listed are not Active Duty Air Force, and most have only four-day work weeks. Should the day count not be 30 Duty Days?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The 30 calendar day requirement will remain. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612605 General PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 1.0, General

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 1.0, General: states that all SO are considered FFP does this also include NTE and Emergency SO?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . All completed service orders, routine, NTE and emergency are Firm Fixed Price. This is not to be confused with the authorization to proceed for NTEs and emergency requests. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612608 General Attachment 01 Contract Binder, PWS Appendix A 3.4 Response and Completion

Times Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This section states that Routine SO Response Time will be accomplished within 18 Calendar Days. The majority of the sites listed are not Active Duty Air Force and most have only four-day work weeks. Should the day count not be 18 Duty Days?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . No, the 18 calendar day requirement will remain. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612609 General PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 3.4.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 3.4.1, Response and Completion Times: States Routine SO's Completions will be completed within 30 Calendar Days. Majority of the sites listed are not Active Duty Air Force and most have only four (4) day work weeks. Should the day count not be 30 Duty Days?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The 30 calendar day requirement will remain. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612611 General PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 3.4.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 3.4.1, Response and Completion Times: States Routine SO's Response Time will be accomplished within 18 Calendar Days. Majority of the sites listed are not Active Duty Air Force and most have only four (4) day work weeks. Should the day count not be 18 Duty Days?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . No, the 18 calendar day requirement will remain. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612613 General PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 3.5.1

PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 3.5.1, states "Multiple facility numbers may be submitted on a single SO." Should this read as one facility number per single SO?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The rule of thumb is single facility per service order. Multiple facility numbers may be submitted on a single service order when it makes sense to do so (ie, stenciling, joint sealant, painting, corrosion protection or where work is dependent (valve replacement with a pipeline replacement) or identical work on multiple facility numbers, multiple facilities that make up one system being repaired, etc.). If multiple facility numbers are included in a single task order, the pricing needs to be broken out by facility number and the APP and/or workplan needs to be submitted with the SO. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612614 General PWS in section 1.5.1, 1.5.2, and (second) 1.5.4

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The PWS in section 1.5.1, 1.5.2, and (second) 1.5.4 states that the contractor has to provide (3) positions as task order specific with no other duties. PM, QCM and Safety Manager. Is it the intent of the government for the contractor to provide fully burdened rates in this pricing proposal for 2080 hours for each of the three positions?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The PWS requirement is that the Offeror provide these three separate and distinct full time positions (three positions equal three separate people) and that they have no other duties outside this task order. It is the Offeror's responsibility to determine their approach for pricing this requirement. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612615 General last page Attachment 01 Contract Binder, PWS Site List

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify if the site listing is current/accurate and that none of the sites may be in the process of being demolished perhaps under other contracts.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The site listing is current. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612616 General RFP, 11., (2) VOLUME II FACTOR

IV – PRICE

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP, 11., (2) VOLUME II FACTOR IV – PRICE, Pg. 39 of 81: Where will the 2080 hours for each dedicated (3) positions be shown to ensure that it is captured for the PWS sections 1.5.1, 1.5.2, and 1.5.4 requirements? (6240 hrs total)

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The PWS requirement is that the Offeror provide these three separate and distinct full time positions (three positions equal three separate people) and that they have no other duties outside this task order. It is the Offeror's responsibility to determine their approach for pricing this requirement. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612617 General RFP, 11., FACTOR II Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP, 11., FACTOR II: PAST PERFORMANCE, Pgs 43-45 of 81: With multiple RFPs getting released can PPQ's for other BoA solicitations be reused from the last 12 months?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . Yes can be reused, but must be submitted for this RFP. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612618 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, (Real property) Buckley AFB Site # 1 (site code BCK) and Minn-St Paul Site #1 (site code MGD) do not have any infrastructure listed. Is the Government going to provide an infrastructure listing for BCK and MGD?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . BCK, MGD, and FCH are Air National Guard sites. The real property for these sites are rolled up under the adjoining Active Air Force sites. BCK equipment is rolled up under BKY; MGD equipment is rolled up under SPL;

and FCH equipment is rolled up under FAI. Both the ANG site and the Active AF site have the same DOD site code. They also have the same RM frequency. There is no equipment missing from the infrastructure list. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612620 General PWS, Pg 125 of 136 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Pg 125 of 136, Fairchild Air Force Base Site # 1 (site code FCH) has "ANG POL ADMIN BLDG" as the only infrastructure listed for this site. Are there any fueling assets at this site and if so, is the Government going to provide an infrastructure listing for FCH?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . BCK, MGD, and FCH are Air National Guard sites. The real property for these sites are rolled up under the adjoining Active Air Force sites. BCK equipment is rolled up under BKY; MGD equipment is rolled up under SPL;

and FCH equipment is rolled up under FAI. Both the ANG site and the Active AF site have the same DOD site code. They also have the same RM frequency. There is no equipment missing from the infrastructure list. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612626 General last page Attachment 01 Contract Binder, PWS Site List

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Based on the last page of the provided PWS it appears that only 14 of the 45 sites identified will have quarterly, semi and annual inspections with the remaining 31 with annual inspections only. Please verify that this is correct and confirm if we are to leave the quarterly and semi-annual costs in the pricing sheet at zero and price only the annual for these sites.

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The last page of the PWS is correct. Pricing should address only the recurring maintenance identified for each site. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612629 General Attachment 06 Pricing Worksheet

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For the quarterly recurring maintenance, does CEHNC want offerors to provide the price of one quarterly maintenance event or the combined total of the four quarterly maintenance events for the given year?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The offeror should provide the total of the four quarterly maintenance events for a given year listed on the pricing worksheet. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6612631 General Attachment 06 Pricing Worksheet

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For the semi-annual recurring maintenance, does CEHNC want offerors to provide the price of one semi-annual maintenance event or the combined total of the two semi-annual maintenance events for the given year?

On: Jul 26 2016.

Government Response. . The offeror should provide the combined total for the two semi-annual maintenance visits for a given year listed on the pricing worksheet. On: Aug 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.