W912DW24Q0SEW - Ground Herbicide Treatment Services.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

W912DW24Q0SEW 12-Mar-2024

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

912-652-5291

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

10:00 AM 11 Apr 2024

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

W912DW9. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

JOHN E MCGUIRE

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

0 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X

SMALL BUSINESSX

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE W68MD9 16. ADMINISTERED BY

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SEATTLE DIST

LOADING DOCK

4735 E. MARGINAL WAY SOUTH

SEATTLE WA 98134-2385

TEL: 206-764-3663 FAX: (206)764-6817

206-764-6817FAX:

TEL: 206-316-3168 SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$10,000,000

NAICS:

115310

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF97

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

CLIN INSTRUCTIONS

Note concerning the below CLIN sturcuture:

CLIN 0001 (and each subsequent option) represents the labor associated with applying the herbicide mixes for CLINs 0002 – 0011 (and each subsequent option). This is estimated at 1,000 acres per year.

CLINs 0002 – 0011 and their corresponding option CLINs are as prescribed in the PWS, paragraph 6.3, Table 1 and 2 (Herbicide Mixes and Herbicide Authorized Use List). CLIN 0011’s unit of measure is each, with “each” representing the unit of measurement for each application of Mix 10 to the remaining 170 acres of the 1,000 total acres for the base and subsequent option years.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1,000 Acre Application

FFP

Application represents the labor associated with applying the herbicide mixes for CLINs 0002 – 0011, to designated areas, on Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: F004

NET AMT

0002 150 Acre Herbicide Mix 1

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #1 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

0003 120 Acre Herbicide Mix 2

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #2 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

0004 120 Acre Herbicide Mix 3

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #3 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

0005 120 Acre Herbicide Mix 4

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #4 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

0006 50 Acre Herbicide Mix 5

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #5 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

0007 50 Acre Herbicide Mix 6

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #6 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

0008 50 Acre Herbicide Mix 7

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #7 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

0009 50 Acre Herbicide Mix 8

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #8 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

0010 120 Acre Herbicide Mix 9

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #9 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

0011 4,800 Each Herbicide Mix 10

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #10 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

1001 1,000 Acre OPTION Application

FFP

1002 150 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 1

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #1 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL)

1003 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 2

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #2 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

1004 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 3

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #3 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

1005 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 4

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #4 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

1006 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 5

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #5 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

1007 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 6

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #6 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

1008 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 7

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #7 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

1009 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 8

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #8 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

1010 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 9

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #9 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

1011 4,800 Each OPTION Herbicide Mix 10

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #10 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

2001 1,000 Acre OPTION Application

FFP

2002 150 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 1

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #1 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL)

2003 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 2

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #2 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

2004 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 3

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #3 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

2005 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 4

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #4 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

2006 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 5

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #5 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

2007 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 6

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #6 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

2008 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 7

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #7 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

2009 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 8

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #8 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

2010 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 9

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #9 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

2011 4,800 Each OPTION Herbicide Mix 10

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #10 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

3001 1,000 Acre OPTION Application

FFP

3002 150 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 1

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #1 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL)

3003 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 2

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #2 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

3004 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 3

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #3 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

3005 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 4

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #4 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

3006 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 5

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #5 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

3007 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 6

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #6 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

3008 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 7

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #7 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

3009 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 8

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #8 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

3010 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 9

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #9 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

3011 4,800 Each OPTION Herbicide Mix 10

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #10 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

4001 1,000 Acre OPTION Application

FFP

4002 150 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 1

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #1 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL)

4003 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 2

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #2 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

4004 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 3

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #3 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

4005 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 4

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #4 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

4006 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 5

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #5 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

4007 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 6

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #6 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

4008 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 7

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #7 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

4009 50 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 8

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #8 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

4010 120 Acre OPTION Herbicide Mix 9

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #9 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

4011 4,800 Each OPTION Herbicide Mix 10

FFP

Reference Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table - Mix #10 and Paragraph 7 within the Performance Work Statement for specifics.

In-accordance-with the Performance Work Statement, Paragraph 6.3 – Herbicides, Offerors shall propose herbicides listed on Table 2 – Authorized Use List (AUL) (Table 2 is located within the Performance Work Statement) to develop their herbicide mixes in-accordance-with Table 1 – Herbicide Mixes Table.

ADDENDUM

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

All offers shall be submitted via email to the points of contact listed in this paragraph. All email submissions shall include the solicitation number (W912DW24QSEW) on the subject line. The offeror bears the burden of ensuring the offer reached the designated contracting office on time and should allow reasonable time for transmission to be completed. Large email files may not transmit properly so it is advised to send large attachments in several separate emails. All pages of the transmission and attachments must reach the office before the offer due date and time. Any part of the offer that arrives after the specified offer due date and time may not be considered. The offeror bears the risk of non-receipt of its offer and should confirm by telephone or email that the offer was received. The points of contact for this requirement are John McGuire, 360-640-8683, email: john.e.mcguire@usace.army.mil and Renee Krahenbuhl, 253-219-6084, email: renee.m.krahenbuhl@usace.army.mil.

*Note: The phone and fax numbers listed on page 1 of this RFP, blocks 7b and 9, are not active and will not be utilized for this requirement.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR WRITTEN SUBMITTALS

The Government will award a single Requirements contract on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis pursuant to the award evaluation criteria stated in FAR clause 52.212-2. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions. Therefore, offerors are cautioned to examine this solicitation in its entirety and to ensure that their proposal contains all necessary information, provides all required documentation, and is complete in all respects. Per FAR provision 52.212-1(g), the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions, if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer.

All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing via email to all email addresses listed in the first paragraph of this addendum. All email submissions shall include the solicitation number (W912DW24QSEW) on the Subject line. All questions pertaining to this solicitation shall be submitted no later than 15 working days after the issuance of the solicitation to allow the Government sufficient time to respond prior to the closing date. If applicable, please identify the PWS/SOW paragraph number as reference to questions. Answers to questions will be posted to SAM website at https://www.SAM.gov at Contract Opportunities under the solicitation number. It is the offerors’ responsibility to monitor the web site for posting of amendments, answers to questions, and other instructions, if any.

At this time, a site visit is not scheudled, but can be provided, if requested.

ALL OFFERS SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION:

- A cover letter with signatures of a corporate officer authorized to negotiate for the company. Include name of the company, phone, fax numbers, and email address(es).

- Submit proposed CLIN (Contract Line Item Number) prices for each CLIN, to include all Option CLINs.

Offerors shall include a UNIT price and AMOUNT. The AMOUNT price is determined by multiplying the QUANTITY by the UNIT price.

- Acknowledged and signed copies of amendment(s), if applicable. The number of copies required will be shown on the SF 30.

- Provide Unique Entity ID (as indicated in SAM), CAGE, DUNs and Tax Identification Number. Offerors are required to be fully registered in SAM at the time an offer is submitted. Offers from offerors who are not fully registered in SAM will not be evaluated and will not be eligible for award. There are no exceptions.

Evaluation Criteria:

FACTOR 1 – Technical

- Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) Commercial Applicator License –

Submission: In accordance with PWS Paragraphs 6.1 & 6.5, the offeror shall submit documentation demonstrating that at least one employee, employed by the offeror, has a current and valid WSDA Commercial Applicator License.

- Experience –

Submission: The offer shall submit supporting documentation demonstrating that either the offeror or subcontractor(s) have a minimum of three (3) years of “relevant” experience within six (6) years preceding the issuance of this solicitation.

FACTOR 2 – Past Performance for the Prime Contractor –

The offeror shall submit a MINIMUM of one (1), MAXIMUM of three (3) recent (recent is defined as within six (6) years of the date on this solicitation) past performance with same/similar services. For each project/contract, each offeror shall submit a description to include the place of performance, period of performance, value of contract of effort, and a point of contact. The Contracting Officer may request additional past performance information at any time prior to contract award.

FACTOR 3 – Price –

The offeror shall submit proposed pricing for the base period and each option period; this is applicable to all Contract Line Item Numbers.

Offerors shall enter the total price in each line item. Proposals shall be provided with only 2-digits after the decimal point. Prices provided shall be fully loaded, inclusive of all fees, overheads, G&A, insurance, profits, or any other markups. Failure to do so may be a cause for the proposal to not be considered for award. In the event there is a difference between a unit price and the total amount, the unit price will be held to be the intended proposal and the total of the CLIN will be recomputed accordingly.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)

Paragraph (a) is hereby replaced with the following:

The Government will award a Requirements contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation is the best value to the Government, price and other factors considered. Award will be made in accordance-with FAR Part 13 – Simplified Acquisition Procedures and using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process.

Except communications conducted for the purpose of minor clarifications, the Government intends to evaluate offers and issue a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Requirements contract, without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a technical and pricing standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary.

EVALUATION FACTORS. The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations:

Factor 1. Technical Evaluation Factor 2. Past Performance Factor 3. Price

FACTOR 1: Technical Evaluation–

- Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) Commercial Applicator License –

Evaluation: This factor is met when the offeror provides documentation demonstrating that at least one employee, employed by the offeror, has a current and valid WSDA Commercial Applicator License in-accordance with PWS Paragraphs 6.1 & 6.5.

- Experience–

Evaluation: This factor is met when the offeror provides supporting documentation demonstrating that either the offeror or subcontractor(s) have a minimum of three (3) years of “relevant” experience within six (6) years preceding the issuance of this solicitation.

“Relevant” experience is defined as performance of efforts involving requirements that are similar or greater in:

Scope (types of services identified and defined in the PWS requirements) and Magnitude of Effort (a contract or aggregated contracts during the 6-year time period totaling at least $200,000). At a minimum, the offeror shall provide the following information for each contract that it relies upon to meet the relevant professional experience requirements:

a) Project title and customer name;

b) Contract number (if such a designation exists);

c) A narrative explaining the requirement and how it is relevant to the requirements of this solicitation;

d) Contract performance

ADJECTIVE DEFINITION

Acceptable

Offeror provides a current and valid copy of at least one employee(s) WSDA Commercial Applicator License and supporting documentation demonstrating the offeror or subcontractor(s) have a minimum of three (3) years of relevant experience within the six (6) years preceding the issuance of the solicitation.

Unacceptable

Offeror does not provide a current and valid copy of at least one employee(s) WSDA Commercial Applicator License and supporting documentation demonstrating the offeror or subcontractor(s) have a minimum of three (3) years of relevant experience within the six (6) years preceding the issuance of the solicitation.

Factor 2: Past Performance for the Prime Contractor –

The Past Performance rating will be based on an “Acceptable” / “Unacceptable” basis. The following definitions will be used in evaluating the degree the offeror will satisfactorily provide the required services based on past and current performance records. An Acceptable or Unacceptable rating will be determined as follows:

ADJECTIVE DESCRIPTION

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

a. Past Performance Information: The information presented in the Past Performance References and information obtained from other available sources other than those identified by the Offeror (such as past performance information obtained from Federal, State and local Government agencies, better business bureaus, published media, and electronic data bases available to the Government) will be the basis for evaluation of this factor.

b. Past Performance Evaluation: The Government will consider the offeror’s previous and current record of contractual performance. The Government assessment will focus on recent contracts that are relevant to the effort required by this solicitation. Recent is defined for this action to be contracts that were performed within the last three (3) calendar years from the issuance date of the Request for Quote (RFQ). Relevant contracts include individual contracts that are similar, in whole or in part, to this solicitation, including contracts performed by a teaming partner or subcontractor.

c. The Government may reject a proposal if it is found that any information that has a negative impact on the offeror’s past performance record has been deleted, misrepresented, or withheld.

d. It is at the Government’s discretion to determine whether past performance information furnished is or is not considered similar to the size and scope of the present requirement. Should the offeror have no past performance information the Government will assign a rating of “Acceptable.”

e. Offerors are cautioned that, in conducting the past performance assessment, the Government may use data provided in the offeror's proposal and data obtained from other sources. Since the Government may not necessarily interview all of the sources provided by the offeror’s, it is incumbent upon the offeror’s to explain the relevance of the data provided. Offerors are reminded that while the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of proving an “acceptable” past performance rests with the offeror’s.

f. Offerors may provide information on problems encountered on the contracts identified in their past performance submissions and the offeror’s corrective actions.

Factor 3: Price –

Price will not be rated. Price analysis will be conducted to determine reasonableness.

Price will be evaluated using various price analysis techniques and procedures IAW FAR 13.106-2(b) including but not limited to, comparison of the proposed price received in response to the solicitation with a comparison to the Independent Government Estimate (IGE) and Market Research.

In order to be considered for award, the Offeror must receive an acceptable rating for Factors 1 & 2 and a fair and reasonable determination for Factor 3. Under Factor 1, both WSDA Applicator License and Experience must be acceptable to receive an overall rating of acceptable for Factor 1, no exceptions.

Factor 1 Technical Evaluation – Acceptable Factor 2 Past Performance – Acceptable Factor 3 Price – Price is determined to be fair and reasonable

(b) Options: The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. To account for the option period(s) possible under Clause 52.217-8 (maximum six months), Option to Extend Services, the Government will take the price for all CLINS of the final option period, prorate it to a six-month value, and add it to the sum of all CLINS (base plus all option periods). This amount will be the total evaluated price. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer, whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-6 Alt I Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government

(JUN 2020) -- Alternate I

NOV 2021

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions

JUN 2020

52.203-15 Whistleblower Protections Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

JUN 2010

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier

Subcontract Awards

JUN 2020

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting AUG 2020 52.204-17 Ownership or Control of Offeror AUG 2020 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance AUG 2020 52.204-20 Predecessor of Offeror AUG 2020 52.204-21 Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information

Systems

NOV 2021

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

NOV 2021

52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters OCT 2018 52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding

Responsibility Matters

OCT 2018

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations

NOV 2015

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Products and Commercial Services

NOV 2021

52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.219-6 Notice Of Total Small Business Set-Aside NOV 2020 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting OCT 2022 52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003 52.222-22 Previous Contracts And Compliance Reports FEB 1999 52.222-25 Affirmative Action Compliance APR 1984 52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging

While Driving

JUN 2020

52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award Management

OCT 2018

52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

NOV 2021

52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004

252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7003 Agency Office of the Inspector General AUG 2019 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2022

252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7004 Antiterrorism Awareness Training for Contractors. FEB 2019 252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation

Support

MAY 2016

252.204-7016 Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services -- Representation

DEC 2019

252.204-7017 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services -- Representation

MAY 2021

252.204-7018 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services

JAN 2021

252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements MAR 2022 252.204-7020 NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements MAR 2022 252.215-7008 Only One Offer JUL 2019 252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013 252.226-7001 Utilization of Indian Organizations and Indian-Owned

Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns

APR 2019

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports

DEC 2018

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor

Personnel

JUN 2013

252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JAN 2021 252.247-7022 Representation of Extent of Transportation by Sea. JUN 2019

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO

SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (NOV 2021)

The Offeror shall not complete the representation at paragraph (d)(1) of this provision if the Offeror has represented that it "does not provide covered telecommunications equipment or services as a part of its offered products or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract, or other contractual instrument" in paragraph (c)(1) in the provision at 52.204-26, Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services-- Representation, or in paragraph (v)(2)(i) of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications- Commercial Products and Commercial Services. The Offeror shall not complete the representation in paragraph (d)(2) of this provision if the Offeror has represented that it "does not use covered telecommunications equipment or services, or any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services" in paragraph (c)(2) of the provision at 52.204-26, or in paragraph (v)(2)(ii) of the provision at 52.212-3.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision-

Backhaul, covered telecommunications equipment or services, critical technology, interconnection arrangements, reasonable inquiry, roaming, and substantial or essential component have the meanings provided in the clause 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

(b) Prohibition.

(1) Section 889(a)(1)(A) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L.

115-232) prohibits the head of an executive agency on or after August 13, 2019, from procuring or obtaining, or extending or renewing a contract to procure or obtain, any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. Nothing in the prohibition shall be construed to--

(i) Prohibit the head of an executive agency from procuring with an entity to provide a service that connects to the facilities of a third-party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements; or

(ii) Cover telecommunications equipment that cannot route or redirect user data traffic or cannot permit visibility into any user data or packets that such equipment transmits or otherwise handles.

(2) Section 889(a)(1)(B) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L.

115-232) prohibits the head of an executive agency on or after August 13, 2020, from entering into a contract or extending or renewing a contract with an entity that uses any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. This prohibition applies to the use of covered telecommunications equipment or services, regardless of whether that use is in performance of work under a Federal contract. Nothing in the prohibition shall be construed to--

(i) Prohibit the head of an executive agency from procuring with an entity to provide a service that connects to the facilities of a third-party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements; or

(ii) Cover telecommunications equipment that cannot route or redirect user data traffic or cannot permit visibility into any user data or packets that such equipment transmits or otherwise handles.

(c) Procedures. The Offeror shall review the list of excluded parties in the System for Award Management (SAM) (https://www.sam.gov) for entities excluded from receiving federal awards for "covered telecommunications equipment or services."

(d) Representations. The Offeror represents that--

(1) It [ ___ ] will, [ ___ ] will not provide covered telecommunications equipment or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract or other contractual instrument resulting from this solicitation. The Offeror shall provide the additional disclosure information required at paragraph (e)(1) of this section if the Offeror responds "will" in paragraph (d)(1) of this section; and

(2) After conducting a reasonable inquiry, for purposes of this representation, the Offeror represents that--

It [ ___ ] does, [ ___ ] does not use covered telecommunications equipment or services, or use any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services.