Amendment 0001 to Solicitation W912DW20R0008_20200710.pdf

Amendment 0001

SOLICITATION

Request for Proposals

Solicitation No. W912DW20R0008

Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Multi-Disciplinary

Maintenance, Repair, Minor Construction, and Incidental Design Work in support of Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM) Public Works and

Other Customers Supported by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers.

Service Disabled Veteran-

Owned Small Business

(SDVOSB) Set-Aside

July 2020

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Seattle District

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment to Solicitation W912DW20R0008 for this $45M Single Aw ard Task Order Contract entitled: "Single Aw ard Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Multi-Disciplinary Maintenance, Repair, Minor Construction, and Incidental Design Work in support of Joint Base Lew is McChord (JBLM) Public Works and Other Customers Supported by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers"

Refer to the Information Page for details regarding the purpose of this Amendment.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 10-Jul-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW20R0008

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

26-Jun-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-Jul-2020

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DW20R0008

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

Amendment 0001 to Solicitation W912DW20R0008 for this $45M Single Award Task Order Contract entitled:

"Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Multi-Disciplinary Maintenance, Repair, Minor Construction, and Incidental Design Work in support of Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM) Public Works and Other Customers Supported by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers", is hereby issued.

1. The purpose of this Amendment is to revise and update the following:

a. Incorporate the briefing slides and attendance roster (enclosed) from the Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit conducted on 8 July 2020 at 10:00 am local time.

b. Incorporate a revised Section 00 21 00, Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors, (enclosed), which supersedes and replaces the Section 00 21 00 included in the original solicitation. Revisions to this section are shown via track changes.

c. Incorporate a revised Section 00 22 16, Proposal Submission and Evaluation, (enclosed), which supersedes and replaces the Section 00 22 16 included in the original solicitation. Revisions to this section are shown via track changes.

2. The proposal due date/time for this solicitation remains unchanged.

3. NOTICE TO OFFERORS: Offerors must acknowledge receipt of this amendment by number and date on the Standard Form 1442, Back, Block 19.

Enclosures:

- Briefing slides and attendance roster from pre-proposal conference/site visit

- Revised Section 00 21 00, Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

- Revised Section 00 22 16, Proposal Submission and Evaluation

US Army Corps of Engineers

BUILDING STRONG®

Pre-Proposal

Conference & Site Visit

Request for Proposal (RFP)

RFP Number – W912DW20R0008

$45M SDVOSB SATOC Multi-Disciplinary Maintenance, Repair, Minor Construction and Incidental Design Work for Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM) Public Works and

Other Customers Supported within the USACE Seattle

District.

Introduction

The slides from this conference will be posted to the

RFP by Amendment on the beta.sam.gov website.

This conference is for informational purposes only.

Comments/clarifications made today WILL NOT change the RFP in any way.

Changes to the RFP shall ONLY be made by written

Amendments.

Questions

Any and all questions from this Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit should be submitted to www.ProjNet.org using the Bidder Inquiry Key and instructions provided in the RFP.

No technical-specific questions will be answered today.

Instead, all questions should be submitted to www.ProjNet.org.

The cutoff for submitting questions in www.ProjNet.org is five (5) calendar days prior to the Offer due date. The current cut-off date is 22 July 2020.

http://www.projnet.org/ http://www.projnet.org/ http://www.projnet.org/

Questions During

Proposal Stage

Contracting Web Address for RFP Documents:

beta.SAM.gov https://beta.sam.gov for RFP number:

► W912DW20R0008

Technical Questions: www.ProjNet.org

For Any Other Administrative Questions, please contact Cathleen Moreno (Contract Specialist) at:

► Email: cathleen.r.moreno@usace.army.mil

Federal Acquisition Regulation: http://farsite.hill.af.mil https://beta.sam.gov/ http://www.projnet.org/ mailto:cathleen.r.moreno@usace.army.mil http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

Classification

This RFP is a SDVOSB Set-Aside Opportunity only.

NAICS Code: 236220 (Commercial and Institutional

Building Construction).

SDVOSB Size Standard is $39.5M.

For specific small business related questions, please contact the Deputy, Office of Small Business Programs at:

► Phone: (206) 316-3990

► Email: john.s.solomon@usace.army.mil mailto:john.s.solomon@usace.army.mil

RFP

General Information

RFP Number: W912DW20R0008

A single IDIQ contract will be awarded.

Three year base period.

Amendments will be issued when changes to RFP are necessary.

Bid Guarantee: A Bid Guarantee is required in the amount of 20 percent (20%) of the Bid price or $3 Million, whichever is less.

► Please see FAR 52.228-1 for more details.

RFP

General Information (continued) Please read Section 00 21 00 and 00 22 16 for required documents for submittal with your Proposal.

The signed Proposals are required to be delivered electronically to the Contract Specialist at cathleen.r.moreno@usace.army.mil and Contracting

Officer at jeffrey.a.ross@usace.army.mil, no later than

2:00:00 PM (Seattle Time) on 27 July 2020.

► Please refer to Block 13 on SF1442.

NO offers will be accepted after the noted time and date.

PLEASE DON’T BE LATE.

mailto:jeffrey.a.ross@usace.army.mil

BUILDING STRONG®9

Summary of Proposal Submission Requirements (Section 00 22 16)

NON-PRICE PROPOSAL (Volume 1)

► Cover Letter

► Table of Contents

► Response to Non-Price Factor 1, 2, and 3 requirements

• PRICE PROPOSAL (Volume 2)

– SF1442 Front & Back

– Authority to Bind

– Completed Schedule for ICF Factors

– Completed Pricing Schedule for Seed Project (include Alternate Structured Approach form for determining profit)

– Section 00 45 00

• Reps & Certs

• Pre-Award Information

– Bank & Bonding POCs

– Bid Bond

– Letter from federally approved bonding corporate surety certifying bonding capacity at a minimum of $2.5M single project and $20M in the aggregate

– Joint Venture Agreement/Information (if applicable)

Wage Determination Davis-Bacon wage rates shall be used for the Seed

Project:

► WA20200013, Building, Pierce County

The Department of Labor (DoL) establishes minimum monetary wages/fringe benefits to be paid in performance of this contract.

The Wage Determination (WD) incorporated into this RFP may be updated/modified during the RFP period.

The most current version of the WD will be incorporated into the Task Order at time of award.

Your offer for the Seed Project must always reflect the latest update to the WD.

Conclusion

Continue to check your emails or beta.sam.gov website for new amendments to the RFP. Check regularly up until the due date and time for your Offer.

Ensure you have completed ALL information required by the RFP and submit those items with your Offer.

Ensure compliance with the RFP requirements.

This RFP shall ONLY be changed by written Amendment.

Again, Don’t be late.

Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Vist Attendance Sheet

W912DW20R0008 8 July 2020

LAST NAME FIRST NAME NAME OF FIRM CONTACT INFO (email) CONTACT INFO (phone)

Roach Mark 2Twenty2 Electric 222electric.co@gmail.com Phone: 253-222-4605

Van Valin Vernon Advanced Technology Construction estimator@atcbuilder.com Direct: 253.203.7008 Cell: 206.510.3368

Wiliams Bruce Ahearn Electric bruce@ahearnelectric.net Cell: 360-265-5667 Office: 360-373-1900

Huerto Sammuel Apollo Mechanical Contractors samm.huerto@apollomech.com Cell: 206-735-2717 Phone: 253-872-5151

Dayton Nick Auburn Mechanical nickdayton@auburnmechanical.com Phone: 253-838-9780 Cell: 206-730-0068

Hilt Kelsey Avalon Contracting, Inc. Kelsey.Hilt@gov-contracting.com O: (253) 383-4559 C: (253) 381-5512

Thompson Michael Avalon Contracting, Inc.

Olson James Avalon Contracting, Inc.

Richardson Jeffrey Avalon Contracting, Inc.

Sherman Matthew Avalon Contracting, Inc.

Morales Daniel Biz4Vets dmorales@biz4vets.us Phone: 916-235-4033

Sharp Cody Blue Mountain Mechanical, Inc. cody@bluemountainmechanical.net Phone: 360-459-4498 Cell: 360-280-6342

Roland Kevin Blythe Mechanical, Inc. kevin.roland@blythemechanical.com Office: 360-389-5500 Mobile: 360-303-6036

Schmidtke Bill Capital Heating & Cooling bill@capitalheatingandcooling.com Main: 360-359-4555 Cell: 360-359-4545

Birdsall Jesse Cascade Power, Inc. jess@cascadepowerinc.com Phone: 360-480-9508

Gwartney Dan Cascade Power, Inc. dan@cascadepowerinc.com Phone: 360-402-0249

Ligtenberg Michel Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc. mligtenberg@cce-inc.com Phone 253 912-1910 Mobile 253 377-6440

Barry Will Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc.

Logan Daniel Centennial Contractors Enterprises, Inc.

Morris Jarrett Code Mechanical Inc. jarrett@codemechanicalinc.com Office: 253-377-2787

Legere Vernon D Square Construction, LLC jasonl@dsquarellc.com Direct: 520.849.4723 Office: 520.748.9371 ext. 100

Sorenson Gage DTS P&L JV mari@pnlgencon.com Office: 360-675-6674 Cell: 360-914-7544

Wallin Ryan DTS P&L JV

Byers Jerry General Mechanical, Inc. jbyers@generalmechanical.com Cell: 206-234-6152

Mack David Hilger Construction, Inc. david.mack@hilgerconstruction.com Phone: 253-584-4766 Cell: 360-213-9557

Yaggi Michael Iron Mike Construction MYaggi@ironmikeconstruction.com Ph: (303) 407-8690 C: (720) 474-4653

Veach Darin LONG dveach@long.com Mobile (206) 423-1604

Stewart Nile Macnak Construction nstewart@macnak.com Office: 253-212-2378 Cell: 253-514-7446

Thompson Dave NCS Corporation davet@ncs-corp.com Cell: 253-301-7577

Wade Mike NCS Corporation mwade@ncs-corp.com Cell: 253-229-7751

Ayala Michael NCSG michael.ayala@ncsginc.com 360-463-9223

Rogers Charles NCSG

Stephens Christopher Northwest Abatement Services, Inc. chriss@nwabatement.com Phone: 253-588-0440 Cell: 253-495-4831

Roland Tony Sabelhaus West troland@sabelhauswest.com Mobile: 360-204-0955

Hall Shaun Safari Electric LLC shaun.hall@safarielectric.com Cell: 360-990-3569 Direct: 360-633-3908

Togioka Peggy Saybr Contractors, Inc. ptogioka@saybr.com Direct: 253-533-2439 Cell: 206-730-8305

Pallotta John Saybr Contractors, Inc. jpallotta@saybr.com Direct: 253-533-2421 Cell: 253-961-0490

Wulf Kristin Schuchart kristin.wulf@schuchart.com Mobile: 253-405-7785 Main: 206-682-3030

Rutkowski Dan Schuchart

Behnen Nick Schuchart

Gibson Jim Sound Energy Systems j.gibson@soundenergysystems.com Office: 253-475-3525 Cell: 253-426-2048 mailto:222electric.co@gmail.com mailto:estimator@atcbuilder.com mailto:bruce@ahearnelectric.net mailto:samm.huerto@apollomech.com mailto:nickdayton@auburnmechanical.com mailto:dmorales@biz4vets.us mailto:cody@bluemountainmechanical.net mailto:kevin.roland@blythemechanical.com mailto:bill@capitalheatingandcooling.com mailto:jess@cascadepowerinc.com mailto:dan@cascadepowerinc.com mailto:mligtenberg@cce-inc.com mailto:jarrett@codemechanicalinc.com mailto:jasonl@dsquarellc.com mailto:mari@pnlgencon.com mailto:jbyers@generalmechanical.com mailto:david.mack@hilgerconstruction.com mailto:MYaggi@ironmikeconstruction.com mailto:nstewart@macnak.com mailto:davet@ncs-corp.com mailto:mwade@ncs-corp.com mailto:michael.ayala@ncsginc.com mailto:chriss@nwabatement.com mailto:troland@sabelhauswest.com mailto:shaun.hall@safarielectric.com mailto:ptogioka@saybr.com mailto:jpallotta@saybr.com mailto:kristin.wulf@schuchart.com mailto:j.gibson@soundenergysystems.com

Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Vist Attendance Sheet

W912DW20R0008 8 July 2020

Darin Walters Sygnos, Inc. dwalters@sygnosinc.com Office: 858-552-0314 Mobile: 858-539-5998

Ware Matthew Tacoma Abatement Company, LLC matt@tacomaabatementcompany.com Cell: 253-985-0165 Office: 253-830-5945 ext 102

Blowers Brad Tacoma Abatement Company, LLC bblowers@tacomaabatementcompany.com Cell: 253-961-0442 Office: 253-830-5945 ext 102

Holmes Ike Vet Industrial ike@vetindustrial.com Phone: 360-377-2955

Wortman Steve Veterans NW Construction stevew@veteransnw.com Phone: 206-324-9777 ext 111 Cell: 206-276-0953 mailto:dwalters@sygnosinc.com mailto:matt@tacomaabatementcompany.com mailto:bblowers@tacomaabatementcompany.com mailto:ike@vetindustrial.com mailto:stevew@veteransnw.com

SECTION 00 21 00

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

Table of Contents

1. General Information

2. General Description of Work

3. Copies of Solicitation Documents and Amendments

4. Inquiries and Comments

5. Small Business Size Standard / NAICS Code

6. Proposal Expenses and Pre-Award Costs

7. Access Requirements and Directions

8. Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit

9. Accuracy in Proposals

10. Proposal Submittals

11. Joint Venture Proposal Requirements

12. Bid Guarantee

13. Subcontracting Goals Regarding the Utilization of Small Business Concerns

14. Solicitation Provisions

1. General Information

Competition for this solicitation is set aside for all eligible Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small

Business (SDVOSB) concerns only.

2. General Description of Work

Contract Title: Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Multi-Disciplinary Maintenance, Repair, Minor Construction, and Incidental Design Work in support of Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM) Public

Works and Other Customers Supported by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers

The purpose of this $45,000,000 SATOC is to provide multi-disciplinary maintenance, repair, minor construction, and incidental design work, primarily in support of JBLM Public Works and other

Customers supported by the Seattle District US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This SATOC will be an Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) type contract. The individual Task Orders negotiated and awarded under this Contract will be firm-fixed price with an anticipated range of $250,000 to $2,000,000. The majority of work under this Contract will be performed at JBLM. A small amount of work may be performed at the Yakima Training Center (YTC) in Yakima. There is a possibility that work may also be performed in Oregon, Idaho, Montana and other areas of Washington for other customers supported by USACE.

Task Orders will involve a broad range of multi-disciplinary maintenance and repair, and minor construction work and may include a variety of trades such as carpentry, road repair, roofing, excavation, interior/exterior elements, mechanical, electrical, steam welding, asbestos, and lead paint abatement incidental to construction. The Contract may also be used for task orders expected to require some incidental design effort by the Contractor. Examples of typical incidental designs include, but are not limited to, fire alarm systems, fire sprinkler systems, HVAC system installation and balancing, communications systems, structural design of minor facilities or components and licensed professional engineer certification of site adaptation of pre-engineered structures. Task Orders issued under this contract may also include the following types of work incidental to the project: environmental abatement, erosion control, earthwork, interior/exterior elements, steam welding, mechanical work, plumbing work, system testing, requirements for anti-terrorism and force protection (ATFP), LEED, LID, EISA, EPACT, historical building renovations, or incidental design.

The Contractor shall provide all plant, labor, tools, equipment and materials (unless indicated otherwise in the specifications) to perform all work in strict accordance with the Base Contract and individual Task

Order requirements. The Contractor is required to maintain a local management office within 1 hour of

JBLM in order to receive Request for Proposals (RFPs), sign Task Orders, Notices to Proceed (NTP), process modifications, receive and initiate various contract correspondence, and to provide other engineering and construction management services related to accomplishing individual Task Orders.

3. Copies of Solicitation Documents and Amendments

Copies of the solicitation and amendments are available by INTERNET ACCESS ONLY. All solicitation documents will be posted to the Contract Opportunities (formerly known as FBO) website at:

https://beta.sam.gov/ under solicitation number W912DW20R0008. Registration is required to download documents from the Contract Opportunities website. It is the responsibly of all offerors to check the

Contract Opportunities website for any amendments. The offeror shall submit all requested information specified in this solicitation when submitting a proposal. There will be no public opening of the https://beta.sam.gov/ proposals received in response to this solicitation. A list of interested vendors (potential offerors and subcontractors) is available on the Contract Opportunities website.

4. Inquiries and Comments

ALL inquiries and comments regarding this solicitation are to be submitted via ProjNet Suite. Telephone and email inquiries will not be accepted. ProjNet Suite is a web-based program that allows offerors to post all inquiries regarding the solicitation, to view all inquiries by other offerors, and view all responses to those inquiries released by USACE. ProjNet can be accessed through ProjNet Suite at https://www.projnet.org

To access the ProjNet for the first time:

1. Click the ‘Quick Add’ link in the upper right menu

2. Enter the following information for access:

a. Agency: Select USACE

b. Key: 2XTNE9-VXY33Z

c. Email: enter your email address

d. Read ‘Privacy & Security Notice’, then check ‘I agree’

e. Click ‘Continue’

3. Enter valid business contact information (e.g. First and Last Name, Company name, city and state, phone number, email address).

4. Establish ‘Secret Question’ answer which will be used for access login.

Access to ProjNet after first login and setup / posting an inquiry:

1. Enter ‘Managing Agency’: Select USACE

2. Enter the following:

a. Email: enter your email address

b. Key: 2XTNE9-VXY33Z

c. ‘Secret Question’ (answer you chose during initial setup)

3. Click ‘Login’

4. Submit technical questions by clicking ‘Post a new inquiry.

5. Submit technical questions.

When a response is posted to an inquiry, the inquiry and response is available for all offerors to review.

For questions about the ProjNet Suite, please contact the ProjNet help desk at 1-833-389-1097 or 217-

367-3273, which operates from 8 am to 5 pm (Central time zone).

No response will be posted to inquiries after the Close of Business on the third business day preceding the solicitation due date. All offerors will be held to have reviewed the inquiries and responses in ProjNet prior to proposal submission. Nothing in the solicitation is changed unless an amendment is sent out. All amendments must be acknowledged in the proposal.

5. Small Business Size Standard / NAICS Code

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code for this acquisition is 236220. The small business size standard is $39.5M.

https://www.projnet.org/

6. Proposal Expenses and Pre-Award Costs

This Request for Proposals (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal.

7. Access Requirements and Directions

JBLM is a controlled access installation. In order to gain access to attend the pre-proposal conference and site-visit, a temporary one (1) day vehicle pass is required to drive on JBLM. The pass may be obtained from the Visitor Center at the JBLM Main Gate. Due to heightened security, the following procedures describe how to gain access for yourself and any subcontractors attending (if they or you do not have current access to the military installation): All attendees must have valid picture identification*. All attendees driving privately-owned vehicles (POVs) must have a valid driver’s license, proof of vehicle insurance and vehicle registration. For rental vehicle access, you must have a rental agreement.

* REAL ID Act: On 1 May 2016, JBLM began enforcing the provisions of the REAL ID Act, passed by

Congress in 2005. Under the provisions of this Act, a standard driver’s license or ID card issued by any of the following states is not accepted for unescorted access on JBLM: Minnesota, Missouri and

Washington. Persons requesting unescorted access on JBLM and who present a standard license or ID from one of those states will be required to present additional documentation to verify their identity prior to being allowed access on JBLM. The list of acceptable documents to present, along with a standard driver’s license or ID Card issued by one of those states, include: DoD CAC, DoD Uniformed Services

Identification and Privileges Cards, U.S. Passport or U.S. Passport Card, VA Issued Health Card, U.S.

Coast Guard Merchant Mariner Card, Transportation Worker ID Card (TWIC) issued by DHS, U.S.

Government issued, authenticated Federal PIV credentials. US Military or Draft Record containing name and DOB, etc. A full list acceptable identification verification documents accepted can be found at http://www.lewis-mcchord.army.mil/ under ‘Access to JBLM’/’Visitors center’/”Visitor Information”. A state Enhanced Driver’s License (EDL) from Washington State and Minnesota are acceptable for access.

Please visit the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) website at https://www.dhs.gov/real-id-frequently-asked-questions for more information regarding REAL ID and frequently asked questions.

DIRECTIONS to Visitor Center / Liberty Gate (Main Gate): From I-5, take Exit 120 (JBLM - Lewis

Main) and proceed to the Visitor Center. The Visitor Center is on the far right just before the Main Gate.

DIRECTIONS to Building 2015: From I-5, take Exit 120 (JBLM - Lewis Main) and proceed through

Main Gate. Turn right at the 3rd stop light onto Pendleton Avenue. Building 2015 will be on the left, at the corner of North 4th Street and Pendleton Avenue, next to the Fire Station. Parking is available across the street or at the back or side of the building.

8. Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit

A one-time pre-proposal conference and site visit for the Seed Project will be conducted on 08 July 2020 at 10:00 am local time, at the parking lot in front of Building 3096, JBLM, WA. Offerors and any subcontractors desiring to attend should arrive no later than 10:00 am local time for the pre-proposal conference. The site visit for the Seed Project will immediately follow. Briefing slides will be provided via e-mail to all registered participants the day prior to the pre-proposal conference. Responses to all

RFIs, questions, and inquiries will be provided to registered participants following the pre-proposal conference. Please submit, in writing, the names of attendees by e-mail to http://www.lewis-mcchord.army.mil/ https://www.dhs.gov/real-id-frequently-asked-questions https://www.dhs.gov/real-id-frequently-asked-questions robert.d.paulson@usace.army.mil and cathleen.r.moreno@usace.army.mil “ATTN: Bob Paulson –

W912DW20R0008” prior to 10:00AM PST 06 July 2020.

OFFERORS ARE URGED AND EXPECTED to inspect the site where construction is to be performed and to satisfy themselves as to all general and local conditions which may affect the cost of performance of the Contract, to the extent such information is reasonably obtainable. In no event will a failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for withdrawal of an offer after opening or for a claim after award of the Contract.

9. Accuracy in Proposals

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

10. Proposal Submittals

Reference Section 00 22 16 for proposal submittal requirements. Due to the COVID 19 crisis proposals shall be submitted via electronic means only to cathleen.r.moreno@usace.army.mil and jeffrey.a.ross@usace.army.mil. The email system is limited to 158MB per email, therefore if your proposal is greater than 158 MB, the file(s) must be split into multiple emails to stay within the size limitation. Electronically submitted Email Proposals must be received no later than the time specified on the Standard Form (SF) 1442, Page 1, Item 13a or as amended under an amendment to this solicitation.

The email(s) containing the Proposals shall be contain the subject: “Proposals for Solicitation Number:

W912DW20R0008”. If multiple emails are used to provide the proposal, each subject line will include the number of total emails, and which email that specific one is (i.e. 1 of 2) after the above stated email subject.

Hand-Delivery Instructions and Common Carrier Delivery Instructions are not applicable to this solicitation.

11. Joint Venture Proposal Requirements

When proposing as a Joint Venture, all members of the Joint Venture shall sign the SF 1442, Authority to

Bind and the Bid Bond unless a written agreement by the Joint Venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the Joint venture. In addition, a copy of the Joint Venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. Refer to Section 00 22 16 for information pertaining to proposal submission requirements for Joint Ventures.

12. Bid Guarantee

In accordance with Section 00 21 00, FAR 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee, a bid bond for the Seed Project must accompany your offer in response to this solicitation and shall be 20 percent of the proposed price for the

Seed Project, or $3,000,000, whichever is less. The Standard Form (SF) 24, dated 08/2016, shall be used for the submission of your bid bond and can be obtained from http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/SF.

Refer to Section 00 22 16 for additional information pertaining to Bid Bond submission requirements.

Facsimile bonds are not acceptable. *Contractors are advised that in response to the COVID 19 crisis, mailto:robert.d.paulson@usace.army.mil mailto:cathleen.r.moreno@usace.army.mil mailto:cathleen.r.moreno@usace.army.mil mailto:jeffrey.a.ross@usace.army.mil http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/SF

Bid Bonds, Payment Bonds, and Performance Bonds are no longer required to have a raised corporate seal nor are required to be notarized and may be submitted electronically, hard copies are no longer required at this time. This change in policy is in accordance with (IAW) class deviation 2020-O0016. For purposes of FAR Part 28.106-1 (Bonds and bond-related forms) bond forms shall be used as indicated except that a seal is not required and IAW FAR Part 28.002 (Policy) electronic signatures and electronic, mechanically-applied, or printed dates may be used and shall be considered original signatures and dates.

In addition to these changes, an electronic copy of SF 28 “Affidavit of Individual Surety” must accompany all bonds. Sureties are to submit the SF28 with corrected verbiage that changes the words from “being duly sworn, depose and say” to the word “affirm.” Refer to 28.203 under class deviation

2020-O0016 for further guidance found at the following link:

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA000941-20-DPC.pdf

13. Subcontracting Goals Regarding the Utilization of Small Business Concerns

The clauses listed below apply to all offerors submitting proposals and special attention should be directed to these as incorporated into the Solicitation:

52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns

252.226-7001, Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises, and

Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns

14. Solicitation Provisions

See the following Provisions applicable to this Solicitation in Section 00 21 00 and Section 00 45 00.

SECTION 00 22 16

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION

Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Multi-Disciplinary Maintenance, Repair and Minor

Construction Work in Support of Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) Public Works and Other Customers

Supported by the Seattle District US Army Corps of Engineers

Amendment 0001

1. Introduction.

1.1. Your firm is invited to submit a proposal in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Contract entitled “Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Multi-Disciplinary Maintenance, Repair and Minor

Construction Work in Support of Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) Public Works and Other Customers Supported by the Seattle District US Army Corps of Engineers.” The majority of work under the resulting Contract will be performed at JBLM, Washington. A small amount of work may be performed at the Yakima Training Center in

Yakima, Washington. There is a possibility that work may also be performed in Oregon, Montana, Idaho and other areas of Washington for other customers supported by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers. This RFP establishes project requirements and provides procedures, format, and other data to assist Offerors in preparing their proposals.

1.2. One Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) type Contract will be awarded to the offeror submitting a proposal that (a) conforms to this Request for Proposals (RFP), (b) is considered to offer the best value to the

Government in terms of the evaluation factors, including price, and (c) is determined to be in the best interest of the

Government.

1.3. The IDIQ Contract to be awarded under this solicitation will include a three-year Base Period, for a total

Contract period not-to-exceed three years. The total capacity of the Base Period shall not exceed $45 million.

While the overall capacity of $45 million is not subdivided between base periods years, it is noted that in no instance will the total amount of Task Order awards exceed $25 million in any given base period year of the Contract.

Individual Task Orders to be negotiated and awarded under this expected Contract will be firm-fixed price with an anticipated range of $250,000 to $2, 000,000. The solicitation for this requirement is set aside for eligible Service

Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) concerns only.

2. Basis of Award.

2.1. Award of the IDIQ Contract will be made based on the best-value, tradeoff source selection process, as outlined in FAR 15.101-1. The Government will consider awarding to other than the lowest priced offeror or to other than the highest technically rated offeror. The Government will consider tradeoffs among price and non-price factors.

The non-price factors, when combined, are considered more important than price. The closer the total evaluated non-price ratings are to one another, the greater the importance of the price evaluation in making the best value determination. The closer the final price evaluations are to one another, the greater the importance of the total evaluated non-price ratings in making the best value determination. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a Contract without discussions. However, if discussions are necessary, the Contracting Officer wi ll establish a competitive range of the most highly rated proposals and conduct discussions with those offerors whose proposals have been determined to be within the competitive range. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. For these reasons, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

2.1.1. Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

Factor 1 – Construction Experience of the Prime Offeror

Factor 2 – Past Performance of the Prime Offeror

Factor 3 – Technical Approach

2.1.2. Price Evaluation Factor:

Factor 4 – Price (includes two Subfactors, as follows):

- Subfactor 4a – Proposed Indirect Cost Factors

- Subfactor 4b – Proposed Seed Project Price

2.2. Summary of Order of Importance for Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

Factor 1 is more important than Factor 2; Factor 2 is more important than Factor 3. When combined, all non-price evaluation factors are more important than price.

2.3. Rating Scheme for Non-Price Evaluation Factor 1 (Construction Experience of the Prime Offeror) and

Non-Price Evaluation Factor 3 (Technical Approach):

Non-Price Evaluation Factors 1 and 3 will be rated using Methodology 2 as outlined in the DoD Source Selection

Procedures. Methodology 2 is a combined Technical/Risk Rating and includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Combined technical/risk evaluations will utilize the ratings listed below in “Table 1 – Combined Technical/Risk Ratings,” considering also the risk descriptions listed below in “Table 2 – Risk Descriptions.”

Table 1 – Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Color

Rating

Adjectival

Rating

Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

Table 2 – Risk Descriptions

Risk

Low Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule or degradation of performance. Normal Contractor effort and normal

Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule or degradation of performance. Special

Contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special Contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

Unacceptable Proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

2.4. Rating Scheme for Non-Price Evaluation Factor 2 (Past Performance of the Prime Offeror): There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy (including context of data), and quality

(including trends in Contractor performance and source of information). In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2), the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in

Contractor’s performance shall be considered, which are combined to establish one performance confidence assessment rating for each offeror. The rating scheme for past performance is thus broken down as follows:

First is to evaluate the recency of the offeror’s past performance information. For purposes of this solicitation, each project will be reviewed to determine if the project is recent or not recent, using the definitions at “Table 3 –

Recency,” below.

Table 3 – Recency

Second is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. For purposes of this solicitation, each recent project will be evaluated on a relevant or not relevant basis using the definitions at “Table 4 – Relevancy,” below:

Table 4 - Relevancy

Third is to establish the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance (see FAR 15.304(c)(2)). The past performance evaluation conducted in support of this source selection does not establish, create or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past Contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed on those past Contracts.

All collected past performance information will be reviewed and used to determine the quality of the offeror’s performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information and incorporate these into the performance

Recent The project is substantially underway or has been completed (Beneficial Occupancy

Date established) within the last six years from the date this solicitation was issued.

Not Recent The project was not completed (Beneficial Occupancy Date established) within the last six years from the date this solicitation was issued.

Definition

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

confidence assessment. A separate quality assessment rating is not required but the past performance confidence assessment rating is based on the offeror’s overall record of recency, relevancy and quality of performance. As such, for those projects that have been determined to be both recent and relevant, the Government will evaluate the quality of the firm’s performance under those projects and assign a rating to the offeror’s overall record of quality of performance, based on the definitions at “Table 5 – Performance Confidence Assessment,” below:

Table 5 – Performance Confidence Assessment

Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

2.5. Definition of Key Evaluation Terms (Strength, Weakness, & Deficiency): During evaluations, technical proposals will receive acknowledgment of any strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses and deficiencies.

When applying these terms to an aspect(s) of an offeror’s proposal, evaluators will use the following definitions:

Term Definition

Strength An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the

Government during Contract performance.

Weakness A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful Contract performance.

Significant Weakness A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful Contract performance.

Deficiency A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful Contract performance to an unacceptable level.

3. General Submittal Requirements.

3.1. Offerors submitting proposals for this solicitation should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein.

Elaborate artwork, expensive paper and bindings, and expensive/extensive visual and other presentation aids are unnecessary. The Government is specifically interested in the substance of an offeror’s response.

3.2. Proposals shall be submitted via electronic means only. The email system is limited to 15MB per email, therefore if a volume is greater than 15MB, the file(s) must be split into multiple emails to stay within the size limitation. Proposals shall be submitted as in two separate volumes: (a) Volume 1 – Non-Price Proposal (original and four copies required) and (b) Volume 2 - Price Proposal (original and one copy required). Each page of each volume shall be presented on standard sized 8 ½ x 11-inch paper (to the maximum extent practicable). Volume 1 shall not exceed a total of 30 pages. Should additional pages be submitted, only the first 30 pages will be evaluated.

Double sided pages count as 2 pages. Past Performance Questionnaire’s submitted in relation to the Past

Performance Factor are not included in the page count. Each Volume shall be submitted in separate, standard letter-size, loose-leaf binders. Contents of bindersProposals shall be tabbed and labeled with a Table of Contents for easy identification. The Table of Contents page, cover letter and tab dividers are not included in the page count. Do not incorporate any material by reference. Material presented as such will not be considered for evaluation. In addition, one electronic copy (i.e. CD, in pdf format) which includes the complete submitted proposal of both Volume 1 and

Volume 2 (excluding any PPQs which were submitted directly to the Contracting Office), shall be submitted with the paper copy of the proposal.

4. Volume 1 – Non-Price Proposal Submittal Requirements (submit one original and four copies).

4.1. Cover Letter. Submit a cover letter as the first page of this volume. The cover letter shall reflect the following information:

(a) Solicitation number.

(b) Name, address, e-mail address, and telephone numbers of the firm signing the SF 1442.

(c) Names, titles, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the firm's behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.

(d) Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal.

(e) A statement specifying agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any and all items upon which prices are offered at the proposed item prices.

(f) A statement indicating compliance with all insurance requirements stated herein and that evidence of such will be provided after Contract award.

(g) Final Proposal Revisions: If required to submit a Final Proposal Revision following evaluation of initial proposals, the accompanying cover letter must identify all changes made to the firm's initial proposal.

4.2. Non-Price Evaluation Factors

4.2.1. Definitions: The following definitions are provided to aid in the preparation of your proposal:

“Construction Renovation, Repair, Alteration, or Upgrade” is defined as construction to, on, or within an existing building, plant, utility, or other structure. Note that the words “Renovation, Repair, Alteration, or Upgrade” may be used interchangeably within this solicitation. Construction where an existing, below-ground structure was demolished and either removed or abandoned in place, and a new below-ground structure was built in its place is considered “construction renovation, repair, alteration, or upgrade”.

“New Construction” is defined as construction of a building, plant, utility, or other structure in a location where no other building, plant, utility, or other structure exists. Construction where an existing, above-ground structure was demolished and a new above-ground structure was built in its place is considered

“new construction.” Building, structure, or utility expansions, where the work only “ties into” an existing building, structure, or utility is considered “new construction.”

“Project” is defined as a single, stand-alone, site-specific Contract effort. In the case of an Indefinite-

Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Contract, work performed on ONE SPECIFIC TASK ORDER would be considered a project. An IDIQ type Contract, in and of itself, is NOT considered a project.

“Relevant Experience” is defined as experience on RENOVATION projects that are similar in size, scope and complexity to those that may be ordered under this Contract. Relevant Experience is further defined as follows:

Relevant Size:

For evaluation purposes, a renovation project with a total dollar value that falls close to or within the dollar value range of orders anticipated to be executed under the resulting Contract ($250K -

$2M) is considered relevant, provided the project meets the other relevant criteria for scope and complexity. Projects less than $250K will not be considered relevant. Projects somewhat more than $2M may be considered relevant if they clearly reflect almost entirely work that is similar to the work expected to be awarded under this solicitation. Projects significantly more than $2M

(more than $4M) will not be considered relevant.

Relevant Scope and Complexity:

Experience with multi-disciplinary construction activities for renovations, repairs, upgrades, and alterations of real property. Examples include the following: Renovation, repairs, upgrades, or alterations to building or plant structural systems, mechanical systems, HVAC systems, fire suppression systems, fire alarm systems, electrical systems, communication line systems;

Renovations, repairs, upgrades, or alterations to infrastructure projects, such as roadways, airfields, underground utilities, overhead utilities, and electrical distribution systems.

Task Orders issued under this Contract may also include the following types of work incidental to the project: environmental abatement, erosion control, earthwork, interior/exterior elements, steam welding, mechanical work, plumbing work, system testing, requirements for Anti-Terrorism and

Force Protection (ATFP), Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Low Impact

Development (LID), Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA), Energy Policy Act (EPAct), historical building renovations or incidental design. Examples of typical incidental designs include fire alarm systems, fire sprinkler systems, HVAC system installation and balancing, communications systems, structural design of minor facilities or components and licensed professional engineer certification of site adaptation of pre-engineered structures.

4.2.2. Factor 1 – Construction Experience of the Prime Offeror

Submittal Requirements:

For this criterion, the Offeror shall submit up to five projects for the Prime Offeror to demonstrate relevant experience.