RFP W912DW20R0003 AMD 0003.pdf

W912DW20R0003

W68MD991490443

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Please see Amendment 0003 changes to W912DW20R0003 on the continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 21

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 28-Feb-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW20R0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11-Feb-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Feb-2020

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 3 CHANGES

Amendment 0003 makes the following changes to the following:

Performance Work Statement (PWS) Sections:

- 1.1 Description of Services/Introduction

- 1.16.17 Phase In

- 1.6.18 Phase out Periods

- 1.10 Permits

- 5.0.6 Analytical Quality Control

- Table 5.5 Task 4 – Cultural Resources Management (Archeology): Deliverable, Quantity, Frequency, and Deliverable,

- 5.14 Task 14 – (OPTIONAL) EPCRA and HM Sustainable Acquisition Compliance

- Attachment 4 Program Area Technical Staff Experience & Qualifications

- Attachment 7 Estimated Travel Requirements

Provisions and Clauses

- 52.219-1 Alt 1Small Business Program Representations – Alternate I

Additional Sections:

- Section L Instructions to Offerors

- Section M Evaluation Factors.

The Performance Work Statement and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan have been removed from “Section C” and added as an attachment.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been deleted:

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

QASP

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The below Table of Contents has been added

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement

108 28-FEB-2020

Attachment 2 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

11 27-FEB-2020

SECTION K - REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

The following have been modified:

52.219-1 SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REPRESENTATIONS (OCT 2014) - ALTERNATE I (SEPT 2015)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) concern means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States and who are economically disadvantaged in accordance with 13 CFR part 127. It automatically qualifies as a women-owned small business concern eligible under the WOSB Program.

Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern--

(1) Means a small business concern--

(i) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans; and

(ii) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of a service-disabled veteran with permanent and severe disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such veteran.

(2) Service-disabled veteran means a veteran, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(2), with a disability that is service-connected, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(16).

Small business concern means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on Government contracts, and qualified as a small business under the criteria in 13 CFR Part 121 and the size standard in paragraph (b) of this provision.

Small disadvantaged business concern, consistent with 13 CFR 124.1002, means a small business concern under the size standard applicable to the acquisition, that--

(1) Is at least 51 percent unconditionally and directly owned (as defined at 13 CFR 124.105) by--

(i) One or more socially disadvantaged (as defined at 13 CFR 124.103) and economically disadvantaged (as defined at 13 CFR 124.104) individuals who are citizens of the United States, and

(ii) Each individual claiming economic disadvantage has a net worth not exceeding $750,000 after taking into account the applicable exclusions set forth at 13 CFR 124.104(c)(2); and

(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled (as defined at 13 CFR 124.106) by individuals who meet the criteria in paragraphs (1)(i) and (ii) of this definition.

Veteran-owned small business concern means a small business concern--

(1) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more veterans (as defined at 38 U.S.C. 101(2)) or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more veterans; and

(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more veterans.

Women-owned small business concern means a small business concern--

(1) That is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women; or, in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more women; and

(2) Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more women.

Women-owned small business (WOSB) concern eligible under the WOSB Program (in accordance with 13 CFR part 127), means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States.

(b)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 541620.

(2) The small business size standard is $15M $16.5M.

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(c) Representations. (1) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a small business concern. (2) [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.] The offeror represents that it [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not, a small disadvantaged business concern as defined in 13 CFR 124.1002.

(3) [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that it [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a women-owned small business concern.

(4) Women-owned small business (WOSB) concern eligible under the WOSB Program. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a women-owned small business concern in paragraph (c)(3) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that--

(i) It [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program, has provided all the required documents to the WOSB Repository, and no change in circumstances or adverse decisions have been issued that affects its eligibility; and

(ii) It [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 127, and the representation in paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this provision is accurate for each WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program participating in the joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the name or names of the WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program and other small businesses that are participating in the joint venture: ___ --.] Each WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the WOSB representation.

(5) Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) concern. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a women-owned small business concern eligible under the WOSB Program in (c)(4) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that--

(i) It [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not an EDWOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program, has provided all the required documents to the WOSB Repository, and no change in circumstances or adverse decisions have been issued that affects its eligibility; and

(ii) It [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 127, and the representation in paragraph (c)(5)(i) of this provision is accurate for each EDWOSB concern participating in the joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the name or names of the EDWOSB concern and other small businesses that are participating in the joint venture: ___ --.] Each EDWOSB concern participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the EDWOSB representation.

(6) [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that it [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a veteran-owned small business concern.

(7) [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a veteran-owned small business concern in paragraph (c)(6) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that it [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern.

(8) [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.] The offeror represents, as part of its offer, that--

(i) It [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a HUBZone small business concern listed, on the date of this representation, on the List of Qualified HUBZone Small Business Concerns maintained by the Small Business Administration, and no material changes in ownership and control, principal office, or HUBZone employee percentage have occurred since it was certified in accordance with 13 CFR Part 126; and

(ii) It [ ___ ] is, [ ___ ] is not a HUBZone joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR Part 126, and the representation in paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this provision is accurate for each HUBZone small business concern participating in the HUBZone joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the names of each of the HUBZone small business concerns participating in the HUBZone joint venture: ___ --.] Each HUBZone small business concern participating in the HUBZone joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the HUBZone representation.

(d) Notice.

(1) If this solicitation is for supplies and has been set aside, in whole or in part, for small business concerns, then the clause in this solicitation providing notice of the set-aside contains restrictions on the source of the end items to be furnished.

(2) Under 15 U.S.C. 645(d), any person who misrepresents a firm's status as a business concern that is small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, service-disabled veteran-owned small, economically disadvantaged women-owned small, or women-owned small eligible under the WOSB Program in order to obtain a contract to be awarded under the preference programs established pursuant to section 8, 9, 15, 31, and 36 of the Small Business Act or any other provision of Federal law that specifically references section 8(d) for a definition of program eligibility, shall—

(i) Be punished by imposition of fine, imprisonment, or both;

(ii) Be subject to administrative remedies, including suspension and debarment; and

(iii) Be ineligible for participation in programs conducted under the authority of the Act.

(9) [Complete if offeror represented itself as disadvantaged in paragraph (c)(2) of this provision.] The offeror shall check the category in which its ownership falls:

___ Black American.

___ Hispanic American.

___ Native American (American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts, or Native Hawaiians).

___ Asian-Pacific American (persons with origins from Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, Japan, China, Taiwan, Laos, Cambodia (Kampuchea), Vietnam, Korea, The Philippines, Republic of Palau, Republic of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, Samoa, Macao, Hong Kong, Fiji, Tonga, Kiribati, Tuvalu, or Nauru).

___ Subcontinent Asian (Asian-Indian) American (persons with origins from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, the Maldives Islands, or Nepal).

___ Individual/concern, other than one of the preceding.

(End of provision)

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

Section L - Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

SITE VISIT INFORMATION

There will be no Site Visit for this solicitation. All inquiries regarding this solicitation are to be submitted via ProjNet, a web-based program that allows Offerors to post questions regarding the solicitation and to view all questions by other Offerors and answers by USACE.

OFFEROR QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS – Bidder Inquiry All inquiries regarding this solicitation are to be submitted via ProjNet-BID. Telephone and email inquiries will not be accepted. ProjNet-BID is a web-based program that allows bidders to post questions regarding the solicitation and to view all questions by other bidders and answers by USACE. ProjNet-BID can be accessed at https://www.projnet.org. To access the ProjNet-BID website the first time:

1. Click the Quick Add menu in the upper right.

2. Enter the following information for access:

- Select USACE as the Agency.

- ProjNet-BID Review: W912DW20R0003

- Input BID Key: 96J984-QJDSDX

- Your email address.

3. Enter valid business contact information

4. Establish Secret Question and Answer which will be used as a password

5. For subsequent access use your email address, the Key and response to the

Secret Question to access the ProjNet-BID Module.

6. Submit technical questions by clicking Post a New Inquiry. When an answer is posted to a question, the question and answer is then available for all other bidders to review.

7. For questions about ProjNet-BID, please contact the Call Center help desk toll free at 1-800-428- HELP (4357), which operates from 8AM to 5PM (Central US time zone). No response will be posted to inquiries submitted after the Close of Business on the third business day preceding the solicitation due date. All bidders will be held to have reviewed the questions and responses in ProjNet- BID prior to bid submission. Nothing in the solicitation is changed unless an amendment is sent out.

PROPOSAL COMPOSITION AND SUBMISSION

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this Request for Task Order Proposal (RFP). Absence of information demonstrates lack of support for a criterion. Proposals shall contain only data essential for evaluation of proposals to expedite both proposal preparation and evaluation. Data submitted must reflect the Offeror’s interpretation of criteria contained in the RFP.

Offerors are required to meet ALL solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. The Offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this section and the RFP at or before the exact time specified in the RFP letter. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award.

PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS

Proposals must be received no later than the date and time identified in the RFP letter.

Proposals shall be sent via email to darrell.d.hutchens@usace.army.mil. A full and complete proposal via email must be or received by the date and time identified in the RFP letter or it will not be considered.

When submitting the proposal please label the proposal “Proposals for Solicitation Number:

"W912DW20P0030”

Due to heightened security at Government installations, those Offerors who have their proposals hand-delivered shall contact Procurement Technician, Sonia Frees at 206-764-3516 or Darrell Hutchens at 206-316-3877 prior to delivering to the address shown below. At the time specified on the solicitation, it will be announced that receipt of proposals is closed.

Recent heightened security at federal facilities have resulted in more time-consuming sign-in and escort procedures and may impact the timely delivery of offers. See FAR 52.215-1 for rules concerning late proposals.

EMAIL: Emailed Proposal will NOT be accepted. FAX: Faxed Proposal will NOT be accepted.

FED-EX/UPS

or other carrier: Darrell Hutchens, Contract Specialist, Building 1202

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District CECT-NWS 4735 East Marginal Way S., Bldg.

#1202 Seattle, WA 98134-2385 Note: Commercial carriers will not deliver to PO Boxes

MAIL: Darrell Hutchens, Contract Specialist, Building 1202

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District CECT-NWS PO Box 3755

Seattle, WA 98124-3755

HAND

DELIVERY: Darrell Hutchens, Contract Specialist, Building 1202 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District CECT-NWS 4735 East Marginal Way S., Bldg.

#1202 Seattle, WA 98134-2385

The method of hand delivery has changed and takes longer than the previous method of arriving at the Federal Center South building (#1201) lobby to deliver your Offer, Bid or Proposal. Please allow sufficient time to allow for heightened security at Government installations and to get to our new location in Oxbow Building #1202. Allow time to park, pass through a metal detector, sign in, and receive a building pass at the Federal Center South Building (#1201). From there, you will be directed to the USACE Oxbow Building (#1202), which sits behind the Federal Center South Building (#1201). Allow additional time.

Report to the Security Desk in the lobby of the USACE Oxbow Building and call Sonia Frees, Procurement Technician, at 206-764-3516 or Darrell Hutchens at 206-316-3877. A Contracting representative will come down and accept your Offer, Bid or Proposal.

Note: If delivery is by any means other than Hand Delivery, please check prior to the due date and time to ensure that your Offer, Bid, or Proposal has arrived on time.

The Packaging that contains the Proposals shall be marked:

“Proposal for Solicitation Number: W912DW20R0003 - DO NOT OPEN”

PROPOSAL FORMAT

2.3.3. Number pages consecutively, from beginning to end. Do not repeat numbering for new sections.

The offeror shall submit all required hard copies and one electronic copy on a CD (do not submit electronic copy on USB device) of their proposal in the format shown below, using tabs/section dividers as indicated. All pages of each tab/section shall be sequentially numbered. Page count limits are provided below in Table L-1, below. Please use Arial, Times New Roman or similar font, size 11, 8.5 x 11 paper for proposal submissions.

Table L-1 - Proposal Format Proposal Document Page Count Limit Volume I – Technical Proposal Title page, Table of contents, List of acronyms, Proposal Cover, Tabs Letters of Commitment

Excluded from limit.

Tab 1 - Executive Summary 1 page Tab 2 - Factor A: Relevant Experience 20 Pages

Tab 3 - Factor B: Past Performance Submit one (1) but not more than three (3) PPQ’s (CPARS may be submitted in lieu of PPQ’s)

Volume II – Price Proposal Cover Letter, Table of contents Excluded from limit.

Tab 1 - Factor E: Price information Not to exceed 10 pages

Tab 2 - SF 33 – Cover Letter, Solicitation, Offer, and Award and Corporate Certificate and any Amendments

Excluded from limit.

At a minimum, the proposal should include a description of the following;

1. Cover Letter

2. Table of Contents: Include all sections contained in the Proposal. Provide a separate section for each Evaluation Factor. Any additions or revisions to the proposal shall include an updated Table of Contents for each set.

PRICE PROPOSAL FORMAT

Cover Letter: The Price Proposal cover letter should be the first page of the price proposal and include:

Solicitation Number Vendor Legal Name List any alternate business names or d/b/a (doing business as) CAGE Code and DUNS Number Mailing Address Principal Office Location (City, State, Zip) Acknowledgement of all “Amendments” by number and date of issue Statement the offeror is acceptable for period of 90 calendar days from the date of submission Person or persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the

Government for this solicitation Acknowledge all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors are updated in offeror’s System for Award Management (SAM) registration at www.sam.gov.

Acknowledge and submit completed Provision 52.204-24 in the RFP letter.

RELEASE OF INFORMATION

After receipt of proposals, no source selection information will be available to any Offeror until contract award. This includes, but is not limited to, the relative standing of the Offeror’s proposal or the number or identity of the participating Offerors.

PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

The Government is in no way responsible for costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal or for any other costs incurred prior to the execution of a contract.

AWARD AND POST-AWARD PROCEDURES

SELECTION AND AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

It is the intent of the Government to make award based upon initial offers, without further discussions or additional information. Therefore, submit your proposal on the most favorable terms from a technical standpoint. Do not assume you will have an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise your proposal.

SELECTION AND AWARD

Award of this Contract will be made to the technically acceptable responsible Offeror submitting the lowest priced offer (based on the total of all line items on the Bid Schedule) – Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable Offer (LPTA). This acquisition will result in the award of a firm-fixed price, service contract. The award of this task order contract be made to the Offeror who presents the Acceptable proposal (Factors A) with the overall lowest fair and reasonable price (based on total of all line items).

DEBRIEFINGS

PRE-AWARD

Offerors excluded from the competition before award will receive a notice and may request a debriefing before award by submitting a written request for a debriefing to the Contracting

Officer within three (3) calendar days after receipt of the notice of exclusion from the competition.

POST-AWARD

Unsuccessful Offerors may request a post-award debriefing within three (3) calendar days after the date on which the Offeror received notification of contract award. There will be no point-by-point comparisons with other Offerors’ proposals and debriefings will not reveal any information that is not releasable under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

End of Section L

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor A - Relevant Experience

Definitions for Factor A (Definitions for the purposes of this factor):

Project means work conducted under a single Task Order or stand-alone contract; projects may involve activities on more than one installation site.

Project Portfolio means the compilation of all projects submitted by the Offeror to demonstrate relevant experience.

Relevant Experience means the Offeror’s project portfolio demonstrates the requirements of all eleven (11) relevancy attributes. Relevant experience may include federal and commercial work. Multiple projects may be used to cumulatively demonstrate all requirements of a relevancy attribute.

Relevancy attributes follow:

1. Facility cradle-to-grave management of hazardous waste for large quantity generator to include:

characterization and profiling of hazardous waste; packaging, storing, transporting and disposing hazardous waste; and 90-day accumulation area site management.

2. Facility wastewater management or consulting services to include: compliance monitoring and reporting for wastewater treatment plants; pre-treatment and industrial process effluent monitoring; facility sanitary sewer system engineering analyses, inspections, and reviews as related to maintenance, operations, alterations, development, or capacity.

3. Cultural resource management or consulting services to include: field and archival research to monitor, inventory, and document historic properties; technical review of facility operations and maintenance to minimize adverse effect and advise compliance or treatment for cultural resources.

4. National Environmental Policy Act services for facility operations and maintenance as related to environmental impacts.

5. Toxic substances management or consulting services to include: technical review of facility operations and maintenance to advise toxic substances compliance and mitigation in the areas of asbestos, polychorinated biphenyls, and lead.

6. Facility air quality compliance management or consulting services to include: compliance monitoring, inventories, and reporting for emission sources such as New Source Performance Standard boilers; technical review of facility operations and maintenance to advise compliance and treatment for air quality; administer air quality compliance training.

7. Facility environmental compliance monitoring management or consulting services to include: development and implementation of environmental audits and; compliance training and; corrective action support.

8. Facility stormwater management or consulting services to include: stormwater system permit monitoring and reporting; inspection of potential operational discharge sources; stormwater system mapping and maintenance on geographic information systems; inspections, and reviews as related to operations and maintenance.

9. Facility pollution prevention (P2) and hazardous materials management or consulting services to include:

implementing and tracking P2 opportunities; implementing Environmental Management Systems (EMS) initiatives; authorizing, inventorying, and tracking hazardous materials usage; toxic release inventory management and reporting; hazardous material substitution; and Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act reporting.

10. Environmental cleanup management and consulting services such as: engineering review, analysis, and comment for on-going environmental monitoring at remediation sites.

11. Facility drinking water management or consulting services to include: water quality compliance sampling and analyses for drinking water systems; facility drinking water system inspections, and reviews as related to operation and maintenance.

Submission Requirements for Factor A:

The Offeror shall submit no more than 20 pages, front and back, to demonstrate all relevancy attributes for Relevant Experience under Factor A. If the Offeror submits more than 20 pages, the Government shall only evaluate the first 20 pages. The Offeror may submit as many projects as they choose within the 20 pages to demonstrate relevant experience. Each submitted project shall be at least 75% complete within the last seven (7) years from the original proposal due date of this solicitation. Example projects can include projects from the Team (Prime or Sub-Contractor) and for which a Letter of Commitment for a Sub-Contractor (see Attachment 1) is provided. Any substitution of the Team after contract award will be subject to the approval of the Contracting Officer and must have qualifications and experience equal to or greater than those of the proposed Team.

See the following “Relevant Experience Matrix” example for presentation of projects. It is recommended that Offerors use this format to clearly identify the relevancy attribute (1-11) represented by project examples submitted as Relevant Experience under Factor A. When combined, the number of examples submitted shall demonstrate relevant experience for all 11 relevancy attributes.

The Offeror shall submit at least one (1) project example, but no more than twelve (12) project examples, which demonstrate the Offeror’s relevant experience. Each submitted project shall be at least 75% complete within the last seven (7) years from the original proposal due date of this solicitation. If the Offeror submits more than 12 project examples, the Government shall only evaluate the first 12 submitted projects. Example projects can include projects from the Team (Prime or Sub-Contractor) and in the area of experience that the project(s) are intended to demonstrate and for which a Letter of Commitment for a Sub-Contractor (see Attachment 1) is provided. Any substitution of the Team after contract award will be subject to the approval of the Contracting Officer and must have qualifications and experience equal to or greater than those of the proposed Team.

See the following “Relevant Experience Matrix” example for presentation of projects. It is recommended that Offerors use this format to clearly identify the areas of experience (1-12) represented by project examples that your firm is proposing for Relevant Experience under Factor A. When combined, the number of examples submitted shall demonstrate relevant experience in all 14 relevancy attributes.

Submittal Requirements for Evaluation:

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE MATRIX

Factor A

PROJECT

TITLE H

az ar d ou s W as te

M gt

W as te w at er

C u lt ur al R es ou rc e

N E

P A

S er vi ce s

T ox ic S u bs ta n ce s

A ir

Q ua lit y

C om p lia n ce

A u di ti n g

S to rm w at er

P 2/

H az ar do us M at er ia ls

E n vi ro nm en ta l C le an up

D ri nk in g W at er

PROJECT 1 X X

PROJECT 2 X X

PROJECT 3 X

PROJECT 4 X X

PROJECT 5 X

PROJECT 6 X X

PROJECT 7 X X

PROJECT 8 X

PROJECT 9 X

For each project, provide Project Specific Information using the Table 2 format:

Table 2 - Project Specific Information shall not exceed two (2) one-sided pages per project. If an example project exceeds two (2) one-sided pages, only the first two (2) one-sided pages will be evaluated.

Table 2 – PROJECT SPECIFIC INFORMATION

1. Project title and location

2. Project start and completion dates (Month/Year) and percentage of completion, if incomplete.

3. Dollar Value of the Contract.

4. Project scope & Offeror/team member role on project. At a minimum, indicate whether the Offeror/team member was the prime contractor or subcontractor on each project and describe the Offeror/team member's role and scope duties in execution of the work (i.e., the major components of the project completed by the prime’s staff and the major components that were subcontracted).

5. Project relevance description. Using the numbered areas of relevant experience (1 through 11 14), indicate which areas of experience are addressed by this project. Provide a description of the project and how it is relevant to each identified area of experience. The Offeror is encouraged to ensure ALL aspects of the relevant experience attribute are demonstrated in the narrative.

6. Current primary point of contact for customer: At a minimum, provide name, relationship to the project, agency/firm, phone number, and email address.

Relevant experience examples may include both federal and commercial work. All Factor A relevant experience projects submitted must be at least 75% complete, or have been completed within the last 7 years from the proposal due date of this solicitation.

FACTOR B - Past Performance for the Prime Contractor

Submittal Requirements for Evaluation:

The project examples submitted for Paragraph 5.2, Submission Requirements for Factor A, will be used for evaluation of Past Performance of the Prime. DO NOT provide Past Performance references for projects other than those project examples provided for Factor A. Submit at least one (1) and up to three (3) projects total for evaluation under this factor. If the Offeror submits more than three (3) project examples, the Government shall only evaluate the first three submitted projects.

The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 2) included in the back of this Section M is provided for the Offeror to submit to the client of projects the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor A in paragraph

5.2. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client’s point of contact (POC).

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Mr. Darrell Hutchens, Darrell.D.Hutchens@usace.army.mil, via email prior to proposal closing date and time.

The Government will accept previously submitted PPQs on Form PPQ-0. Please ensure all information is up to date and meets the requirements of the evaluation factor.

Note: You may submit CCASS ratings in lieu of the PPQ forms included in Attachment 2 if you completely fill in blocks 1 - 5 of the Contract Information portion of the NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) and submit with the Final CCASS report. Be sure to include the POC’s information of the Client and the Contract Number of the project.

Evaluation Method for Factor B: The method of rating for Factor B shall be as follows:

The Government will evaluate an Offeror’s past performance based on a demonstrated record of performance.

Past performance information is an indicator of an Offeror’s ability to perform the contract successfully. The Government will evaluate the successful completion of all project examples submitted in the proposal for Factor A. The Government reserves the right to check any or all cited references to verify supplied information and to assess owner satisfaction.

The Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System

(CPARS).

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

FACTOR B – PAST PERFORMANCE OF OFFEROR EVALUATION RATING

Rating: Description:

Acceptable

Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the O fferor’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable

Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE: In the case of an Offeror without a record of past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror’s past performance may not be evaluated as favorable or unfavorable. [Ref: FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)]. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

ATTACHMENT 1

LETTER OF COMMITMENT OF KEY SUB-CONTRACTOR

(USE SUB-CONTRACTOR’S COMPANY LETTERHEAD)

TO: Contracting Officer:

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for:

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby indicate my commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), (insert name of subcontractor) will fulfill the duties of (state role on project).

Sincerely, (Signed by Authorized Official) Date:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information:

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy): Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.):

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information:

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

ATTACHMENT 2: CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY NAVFAC/USACE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information:

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact’s Phone Number:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE

TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE

SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT

QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED

DIRECTLY TO USACE. [PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT EVALUATION

(E) Exceptional:

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good:

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory:

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal:

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory:

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable:

No information or did not apply to your contract.

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT EVALUATION

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel

E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk. (Please attach additional pages if necessary)

(End of Summary of Changes)

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PROGRAM SERVICES

JOINT BASE LEWIS-McCHORD (JBLM), WASHINGTON

January 2020

February 2020

General Information

1 General: This is a non-personal services Firm-Fixed Price Contract to provide Environmental Quality

(EQ) Services at JBLM, Washington. The Government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein.

1.1 Description of Services/Introduction: The Contractor shall provide all trained personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to provide environmental compliance support activities necessary to support JBLM Public Works

Environmental Department (PW-ED) as defined within this Performance Work Statement (PWS) which requires conformance with federal, state, and local statutes and regulation; Executive Orders, Department of

Defense (DoD)/Army policies, and FC/PCMS PW-ED requirements, including installation Activity

Management Plans (AMPs), Environmental Action Plans (EAPs), and Integrated Management Plans. The

Contractor shall perform to the standards in this contract to include Attachment 1, Performance

Requirements Summary; approval of work and/or deliverables involves review and acceptance or concurrence from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), JBLM PW-ED, applicable regulatory authorities, and/or other project stakeholders as deemed appropriate by the Government.

1.2 Background: JBLM consists of the former Fort Lewis and the former McChord Air Force Base which were combined in 2010. Approximately 78 Active, Guard and Reserve Military units, 40 Contractors, and 25

Military Support Organizations are located on JBLM. The Base encompasses an area of 90,837 acres within

Pierce and Thurston Counties in Washington State. Yakima Training Center (YTC) is a sub-installation of

JBLM and is located approximately 100 miles east of JBLM and is about 10 miles north of the city of

Yakima. It encompasses 327,231 acres within Yakima and Kittitas Counties in central Washington State.

JBLM PW-ED is responsible to ensure environmental compliance at the additional sub-installations:

Fort Stevens State Park, Hammond, Oregon

Fort Worden State Park, Port Townsend, Washington

Hamilton Army Airfield, Novato, California

Grant County International Airport, Moses Lake, Washington

SEATAC International Airport, SeaTac, Washington

Umatilla Army Depot, Umatilla, Oregon

Yakima Training Center, Yakima, Washington

Army Regulation 200-1, Environmental Protection and Enhancement, establishes the framework for execution of the

Army EQ). The Army EQ Program includes three program areas: Compliance, Conservation, and Pollution

Prevention (P2), and PW-ED is responsible for managing and executing requirements in these EQ Program areas at

JBLM.

1.3 Objectives: The…