Amendment 0001 W912DW20B0009 SFAB Phase 1.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0001 to W912DW20B0009, Repair Security Forces Assistance Brigade (SFAB), Phase 1 at Joint Base Lew is-McChord (JBLM), Washington.

See Continuation Page for Amendment details.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 12

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Jul-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW20B0009

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25-Jun-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Jul-2020

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DW20B0009

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

Amendment 0001 to Solicitation W912DW20B0009 for project entitled, “Repair Security Forces Assistance Brigade, Phase 1” at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), Washington, is hereby issued.

1. The purpose of this Amendment is to accomplish the following:

a. Incorporate a revised Section 00 22 00, Supplementary Instructions – Step One Technical Proposal Submission Requirements and Evaluation Criteria, which supersedes and replaces the Section 00 22 00 included with the original solicitation. Revisions to this section are shown via highlight.

b. Incorporate the attendance roster from the site visit conducted on 7 July 2020.

2. The proposal due date/time for Step One technical proposal submittals in response to this solicitation remains unchanged.

3. All other terms and conditions of this solicitation remain unchanged.

4. NOTICE TO OFFERORS: Offerors must acknowledge receipt of this amendment, and any previous amendments, by number and date on the Standard Form 1442, Back, Block 19 and on Attachment A, Proposal Cover Sheet from Section 00 22 00.

Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instructions

STEP ONE EVALUATION CRITERIA

STEP ONE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND

EVALUATION CRITERIA

A. BASIS OF AWARD

Those offerors who submit “Acceptable” technical proposals in response to Step One will be issued an amendment to the solicitation and will move on to Step Two of the Two-Step Sealed Bidding process. After bid opening in Step Two, the Contracting Officer will award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsive and responsible bidder, whose bid conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and provides the lowest overall price to the Government.

Note that this Section includes the submission requirements and evaluation criteria for the Step One technical proposal ONLY. The technical proposal, with the required information noted herein, is the only item that must be submitted in response to Step One.

B. ELIGBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the requirements of Part 9 of the FAR, no contract shall be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective prime contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

C. GENERAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION

1. An offeror’s proposal shall consist of all information and material submitted in writing for evaluation in response to the solicitation. The submission of false or misleading information shall be grounds for disqualification of the proposal. Offerors must organize their proposals as described and outlined in Paragraph E below. The offeror’s name, solicitation number, and date must be affixed to the outside of each submission. Each submission must have a table of contents. Pages may be single-sided or double-sided (double-sided pages count as two pages) and must be numbered. Any prescribed page and formatting limitations will be strictly adhered to and enforced by the Government. The Government will not evaluate any excess information resulting from the offeror’s failure to comply with the submission instructions.

2. The evaluation shall be conducted in accordance with FAR Subpart 14.5, Two-

Step Sealed Bidding. For this procurement, only one technical proposal may be submitted by each offeror. Step One proposals are evaluated for technical acceptability. The technical proposal shall not include prices or pricing information.

Offerors should submit a proposal that is complete without the need for additional explanation or information. The Government may make a final determination regarding a proposal’s acceptability solely on the basis of the proposal as submitted.

The Government may proceed with the second step without requesting further information from any offeror; however, the Government may request additional information from offerors of proposals that it considers reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable and may discuss proposals with their offerors. Clarifications or discussions may be held, if necessary and if determined by the Contracting Officer to be in the best interest of the Government. A notice of unacceptability will be forwarded to the offeror upon completion of the proposal evaluation and final determination of unacceptability.

3. Technical proposals will be read at the factor level. If any factor is found unacceptable, the proposal will be determined unacceptable. The initial technical proposal may have limited errors, omissions, weaknesses and/or deficiencies and still be considered reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable, and therefore eligible for discussions, if the Contracting Officer determines that discussions are in the best interest of the Government. However, an initial proposal that contains one or more unacceptable factors will be considered unacceptable and will be eliminated from further consideration.

4. Technical proposals which do not provide the specified information in the specified location in accordance with the submission instructions may be determined unacceptable. The Government is under no obligation to search for information that is not in the specified location.

5. If discussions are held with offerors whose proposals are considered reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable and a revised proposal is requested, the revised proposal will be reevaluated in accordance with the evaluation factors and the standards set forth for the evaluation factors in this solicitation. After completion of discussions and evaluation of any revised proposals, the proposal shall be determined as acceptable or unacceptable. If a proposal, either during initial evaluations or during subsequent evaluations if discussions are conducted, is determined unacceptable, a notice of unacceptability will be forwarded to the offeror upon completion of the proposal evaluation and final determination of unacceptability.

6. The offerors’ conformance with the specified format and submission requirements will be considered during the technical evaluation. Failure to comply with the formatting and/or submission requirements may be seen as indicative of the type of problems that could be expected during contract performance. Lack of conformance and material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable.

7. The proposal submission instructions are written to give prospective offerors, where feasible, an indication of the level of detail desired by the Government. The offerors’ failure to include information that the Government has indicated must be included will result in the proposal being found deficient and therefore unacceptable.

D. TECHNICAL FACTOR EVALUATION

1. The Government’s Technical Evaluation Team will evaluate each offeror’s technical proposal received in response to this Step One solicitation based on the standard of each evaluation factor set forth in this Step One solicitation. Each proposal will be evaluated solely against the standards set forth for each technical evaluation factor in this Step One Solicitation. The Technical Evaluation Team will not compare proposals against each other. In accordance with FAR Subpart 14.503- 1(e)(1) and (2), proposals will be rated as Acceptable, Reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable or Unacceptable, as defined in Table 1, below, and as determined by consensus of the Government’s Technical Evaluation Team. There are no relative weights assigned to the factors.

2. The evaluation factors correlate directly to the main organizational tabs identified in the proposal submission instructions in Paragraph E below. However, any information contained in the technical proposal can nonetheless be considered by the Government in its evaluation under any factor.

Table 1 – Technical Ratings

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Offeror has met the Standard indicated by the Evaluation Factor.

Reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable

Offeror has not met the Standard indicated by the Evaluation Factor, due to error(s), omissions(s), weakness

(es) or deficiency (ies), which are capable of being corrected without a major rewrite or revision of the proposal.

Unacceptable Offeror has not met the Standard indicated by the Evaluation Factor.

3. The Government’s Technical Evaluation Team will assign a rating to each evaluation factor within each offeror’s Step One technical proposal. If any factor is categorized as Unacceptable, then the Step One proposal will be categorized as Unacceptable and therefore ineligible to move on to Step Two. If any of the factors is categorized as Reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable, the Contracting Officers reserves the right to enter into discussions in accordance with FAR 14.501(a) and 14.503. However, the Contracting Officer is not required to enter into discussions with offerors whose proposals are categorized as Reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable if the Contracting Officer determines that it is in the Government’s best interest not to enter into discussions. Note that any proposal which modifies, or fails to conform to the essential requirements or specifications of the Step One Solicitation will be considered nonresponsive and categorized as Unacceptable.

E. STEP ONE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: GENERAL SUBMISSION

INSTRUCTIONS

a. Format, Media, Contents, and List of Tabs for the Technical Proposal

i. Use the attached cover sheet (Attachment A) when submitting the

Step One Technical Proposal.

ii. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, etc. Do not include links to information on websites in lieu of incorporating the information physically into the proposal.

Except where another size is specifically authorized for a specific submission, use only 8.5” x 11” paper. Use at least 1 inch margins, which may include headers and footers. Do not justify the right margin. Ensure that all text and graphics are clearly legible. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, or unusual font styles such as script, or condensed fonts. Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a “Table of Contents” or divider tabs, are excluded from page limitations.

iii. There is a 24-page limit for the overall technical proposal. The

Proposal Cover Sheet (Attachment A) and the completed Standard Form1442 do not count towards the 24-page limit. In the case of a Joint Venture Proposal, the Proposal Cover Sheet (Attachment A), the completed Standard Form 1442, copy of Joint Venture Agreement and certificate signed by each participant in the Joint Venture do not count towards the 24-page limit (see SECTION 00 21 16 Paragraph 16. Joint Venture Proposal Requirements).

Organize your technical proposal as indicated below. The tabs directly correlate to the technical evaluation factors as listed below.

Although the Government may use information contained anywhere within the technical proposal in its evaluation of any technical evaluation factor, the Government is not obligated to search for or to consider information that is not located in the specified location. Start the information for each example project on a new page. Number the pages. Do NOT include information pertaining to your proposed pricing for this project in the technical proposal. Limit your submittals to the information specified; excess information and pages will not be evaluated.

STEP ONE PROPOSAL CONTENTS ORGANIZATION:

Proposal Cover Sheet (Attachment A)

In the case of a Joint Venture, the copy of the Joint Venture Agreement and certificate signed by each participant in the Joint Venture (as required by Section 00 21 16, Paragraph 16. Joint Venture Proposal Requirements) Standard Form 1442 TAB 1 – Factor 1 – Relevant Renovation and Repair Experience (Attachment B) TAB 2 – Factor 2 – Qualification of Proposed Key Team Members (Attachment B) TAB 3 – Factor 3 – Experience Working on Military Installations (Attachment B) TAB 4 – Factor 4 – Experience with Incidental Design (Attachment B)

b. Conditioning of Proposal or Bid

Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or bid price submissions. Inclusion of any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in a determination that the proposal/bid is unacceptable and thus ineligible for award.

Resolve questions about the terms and conditions or technical requirements of the solicitation prior to submission of the proposal/bid. Please refer to Section 00 21 00 of the solicitation, Inquiries, for instructions on submitting inquiries.

c. Restrictions on Offeror – Provided Information

“Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include information in their proposals and bid information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must clearly mark such information in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”. Files shall not include classified data.

F. STEP ONE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: TECHNICAL EVALUATION

FACTOR SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS/STANDARDS

*** TECHNICAL PROPOSALS SHALL NOT INCLUDE PRICES OR

PRICING ***

1. General

The information provided in this section will be used in evaluating the offeror’s technical proposals in response to the evaluation factors specific to this solicitation.

The information that is required for Factors 1, 3 & 4 are identified in Attachment B, “TECHNICAL EXPERIENCE”, which can be extended to two pages. Offerors are not required to use the form itself as part of their proposal, but the information requested on the form must be in the offeror’s proposal and should be in the same format as the form.

For factors 1 through 4, the project descriptions and relevancy narratives must clearly articulate the relevancy in sufficient detail to determine technical capability. Projects that meet multiple requirements can be submitted under multiple factors; however, the relevancy discussions must be specific to each factor.

Note to Offerors: Projects submitted under Factors 1, 3 and 4 must have been performed by the firm submitting an offer for this solicitation (same CAGE Codes and DUNS numbers) and must have been performed as the prime contractor (not as a subcontractor). Projects performed by a parent company, sister company, teaming partner, affiliate or business other than the specific firm submitting an offer for this solicitation will not be evaluated.

For Factors 1, 3 and 4, projects submitted by Joint Ventures (J-V): Offerors must include at least one project completed by each of the companies representing the J-V agreement. These projects must have been performed by a member of the J-V submitting an offer for this solicitation (i.e., same CAGE codes and DUNS numbers) and must have been performed as the prime contractor (not as a subcontractor).

Projects submitted that were completed by the J-V firm count as a project for each firm within the J-V agreement.

2. Submission Requirements and Technical Evaluation Factors. The following technical evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal submitted in response to Step One:

Factor 1. Relevant Renovation and Repair Experience.

Standard: Offeror shall submit three (3) projects (no more, no less) that have been completed within the past seven (7) years from the date proposals are due, or are substantially complete. Projects outside of this time frame will not be considered. The projects shall involve substantial/complete renovation and repair of multiple buildings. Two of the three projects submitted shall be in the $20 million or greater price range. The remaining project may be of any dollar value. Each project shall have a title and location, a detailed description of the work performed, and the total dollar value of the project, and shall show beginning and end dates for the project. Please note that if the project is in progress, the offeror must demonstrate in the detailed description that the project is substantially complete. Additionally, the Government will ascertain whether or not the project involved renovation and repair of multiple buildings solely from the detailed descriptions; therefore, offerors are advised to provide sufficient information to make this determination.

Factor 2. Qualification of Proposed Key Team Members.

Standard: Offerors shall submit resumes for the following two (2) identified key positions. The individuals submitted shall meet either the required number of years of experience stated or the combined experience and education stated.

Construction Program Manager: The Construction Project

Manager shall have a baccalaureate degree in engineering, architecture, construction management or equivalent and a minimum of five (5) years of experience managing construction projects of similar size, scope, and complexity as the work under this solicitation or have a minimum of ten (10) years of experience managing construction projects of similar size, scope, and complexity as the work under this solicitation.

Project Superintendent: The Project Superintendent shall have a minimum of five (5) years of experience as a project superintendent on construction projects of similar size, scope, and complexity as the work under this solicitation.

The resumes submitted for each of these key personnel must include all relevant education and a list of projects that demonstrate the minimum number of years of relevant experience. Each project shall have a title and location, a detailed description of the work performed, and the total dollar value of the project, and shall show beginning and end dates for the project. The Government will ascertain whether or not the project is similar in size, scope and complexity solely from the detailed descriptions; therefore, offerors are advised to provide sufficient information to make this determination. Offerors are further advised that the projects submitted to demonstrate the relevant experience of each key individual must add up to the minimum number of years of experience as indicated in the standard for each position (e.g. a resume for a Project Superintendent claiming five years of experience but having only

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Offeror has met the Standard indicated by the Evaluation Factor.

Reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable

Offeror has not met the Standard indicated by the Evaluation Factor, due to error(s), omissions(s), weakness

(es) or deficiency (ies), which are capable of being corrected without a major rewrite or revision of the proposal.

one project that took place in 2018-2019 does not meet the standard.).

NOTE: It is expected that the key team members proposed herein will be the individuals who perform these positions under the resulting contract.

Any changes to these proposed key team members after award MUST be accepted by the Contracting Officer.

Factor 3. Experience Working on Military Installations.

Standard: The offeror shall submit two (2) projects (no more, no less) that have been performed on military installations that have been completed within the past seven (7) years from the date proposals are due or are substantially complete. Projects outside of this time frame will not be considered. The projects may be of any size and scope. Each project shall have a title and location, a detailed description of the work performed, and the total dollar value of the project, and shall show beginning and end dates for the project. Please note that if the project is in progress, the offeror must demonstrate in the detailed description that the project is substantially complete.

Acceptable Offeror has met the Standard indicated by the Evaluation Factor.

Reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable

Offeror has not met the Standard indicated by the Evaluation Factor, due to error(s), omissions(s), weakness

(es) or deficiency (ies), which are capable of being corrected without a major rewrite or revision of the proposal.

Factor 4. Experience with Incidental Design.

Factor.

Reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable

Offeror has not met the Standard indicated by the Evaluation Factor, due to error(s), omissions(s), weakness

(es) or deficiency (ies), which are capable of being corrected without a major rewrite or revision of the proposal.

Standard: The offeror shall submit two (2) projects (no more, no less) that have included application and adaptation of design template to different sites, and/or incidental design to include design-build that have been completed within the past seven (7) years from the date proposals are due or are substantially complete. Projects outside of this time frame will not be considered. The projects may be of any size and scope. Each project shall have a title and location, a detailed description of the work performed, and the total dollar value of the project, and shall show beginning and end dates for the project. Please note that if the project is in progress, the offeror must demonstrate in the detailed description that the project is substantially complete.

Factor.

Reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable

Offeror has not met the Standard indicated by the Evaluation Factor, due to error(s), omissions(s), weakness

(es) or deficiency (ies), which are capable of being corrected without a major rewrite or revision of the proposal.

G. EVALUATION OF THE BID, STEP TWO

In Step Two, the normal sealed bidding procedures will be followed. However, Step Two will be issued only to those offerors who submitted acceptable technical proposals in Step One. Each bid in the second step must be based on the bidder’s own technical proposal and must comply with the specifications. Information required to be submitted in addition to the bid price in Step Two (i.e. executed SF1442 with acknowledgment of all amendments, representations and certifications, bid guarantee, bidder’s pre-award survey information, etc.) will be fully outlined in an Amendment to the solicitation incorporating Step Two and will be used to determine the bidder’s eligibility for contract award.

The following have been modified:

ATTACHMENT A

ATTACHMENT A

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Name, Address, and DUNS Number of Prime Contractor:

2. Telephone Number:

3. Solicitation Number:

4. Title of Project:

5. Name and Title of Person Authorized to Sign Proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent's authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office:

6. Names, titles, and telephone and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror's behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

7. For Joint Ventures: Provide the complete names, addresses, and phone number of the companies comprising the Joint Venture/Mentor-Protégé:

8. Statement that offeror agrees with all terms, conditions and provisions included in this solicitation:

9. Signature:

10. Proposal Date:

11. Amendments (Acknowledged by Number & Date):