R0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

RFP W912DW18R0009

Amendment R0001

(Please see continuation page for more details)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 36

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 26-Jul-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW18R0009

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12-Jul-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

26-Jul-2018

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DW18R0009

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been added by full text: R0001

1. This amendment one (0001) provides for the following:

Revisions to Table of Contents Revisions to Section 00 21 16 Revisions to Section 00 22 16 The site visit slides and roster are provided for informational purposes only.

2. 52.204-8, “Annual Representation and Certifications” has been revised.

252.203-7004, “Display of Hotline Posters” has been revised.

3. The proposal submittal time and date of 1:00:00 PM LOCAL TIME, 14 August 2018 remains the same.

4. The attached revised sections are to be replaced in their entirety. Specifications changes are generally identified, for convenience, either by strikeout for deletions, and double underlining of text for additions or a single dark line in the margin. All portions of the revised sections shall apply whether or not changes have been indicated.

5. NOTICE TO OFFERORS: Offerors must acknowledge receipt of all amendments including this amendment by number and date on bid.

Encl:

Table of Contents (Revised) Section 00 21 16 (Revised) Section 00 22 16 (Revised) Site Visit Slides and Roster (New)

W912DW18R0009 R0001

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

SF1442 Solicitation, Offer and Award

Section 00 01 10 Table of Contents

Section 00 10 00 Caution to Offerors, Corporate Certificate, Price Schedule, Contract Rate Pricing Schedule and CLINs

Section 00 21 00 Instructions (Provisions)

Section 00 21 16 Supplementary Instructions to OfferorsProposers

00 22 16 Supplementary Instructions to OfferorsProposers (Evaluation Factors)

00 45 00 Representations and Certifications and Pre-Award Information

00 72 00 General Conditions (Contract Clauses)

00 73 00 Special Clauses, which include the following:

1) Profit – Alternate Structured Approach

2) Davis-Bacon General Wage Decision No.: WA97

01 00 00 Technical Specifications for both MATOC and Seed Project:

01 11 00 (SOW) thru 33 82 00 and Drawings

RETURN THE FOLLOWING WITH YOUR PROPOSAL:

SF1442 Pages 00 11 00-1 thru 00 11 00-6 (00 11 00-3 is reserved for use at a later time);

Section 00 45 00 Representations and Certifications and include the Pre-Award information pages 00 45 00-A and B.

20% Bid Bond - Bid Bonds must be accompanied by a Power of Attorney containing an original signature from the surety, which must be affixed to the Power of Attorney after the Power of Attorney has been generated. Computer generated and signed Powers of Attorney will only be accepted if accompanied by an original certification from a current officer of the surety attesting to its authenticity and continuing validity. Additionally, ensure the dates, names, and addresses are correct.

Current SF24 forms are available at the following website: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/TOP.

Unless specified, the following information does not need to be submitted with your Offer, BUT it is required to be completed before the contract can be awarded:

Contractors are required, before receipt of contract award to ensure that their firm is registered in the government web site entitled System for Award Management (SAM) and that all required information is current and up to date.

https://www.sam.gov

W912DW18R0009 Page 1 R0001

SECTION 00 21 16

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFEROR PROPOSER

1. General Information

2. General Description of Work

3. Subject to Availability of Funds

3.4. Disclosure of the Magnitude of the Seed Project

4.5. General Security Requirements

5.6. Copies of Solicitation Documents and Amendments

6.7. Offeror’s Questions and Comments

7.8. Small Business Size Standard / NAICS Code:

8.9. Proposal Expenses and Pre-Award Costs

9.10. Access Requirements and Directions

10.11. Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit

11.12. Accuracy in Proposals

12.13. Proposal Submittals

13.14. Proposal Format

14.15. Joint Venture Proposal Requirements

15.16. Bid Guarantee

16.17. Subcontracting Goals Regarding the Utilization of Small Business Concerns

17.18. Solicitation Provisions

W912DW18R0009 Page 2 R0001

1. General Information:

Competition for this solicitation is set aside for eligible 8(a) Small Business concerns only.

2. General Description of Work:

Contract Title: Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for; Multi-Disciplinary Maintenance, Repair, Construction and Incidental Design Work for Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM) Its Sub-Installations and Other Customers Supported within the USACE Seattle District. (the other customers are located in Washington, Idaho, Montana and Oregon).

The purpose of this $175,000,000 MATOC is to is to support primarily general construction activities at JBLM and its sub-installations, including but not limited to, renovation, repairs, minor building expansions and pre-engineered buildings (not to exceed the statutory limit for new construction), preventative maintenance, environmental abatement, erosion control and earthwork. Similarly, the task orders under this MATOC are primarily intended to provide a timely procurement response to general construction work such as remediation of facilities, e.g., maintenance, repair, asbestos and lead-based paint abatement, and minor construction situations relating to but not limited to civil, mechanical, plumbing, structural, electrical, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), and anti-terrorism and force protection.

The MATOC may also be used for Task Orders expected to require some incidental design effort by the Contractor, to include, but not be limited to, fire alarm systems, fire sprinkler systems, HVAC system installation and balancing, communications systems, structural design of minor facilities or components and licensed professional engineer certification of site adaptation of pre-engineered structures.

Task Orders issued under this MATOC may also include the following types of work incidental to the project:

environmental abatement, erosion control, earthwork, mechanical work, plumbing work, system testing, requirements for anti-terrorism and force protection (ATFP), LEED, LID, EISA, EPAct, and historical building renovations.

The Contractor shall provide all plant, labor, tools, equipment and materials (unless indicated otherwise in the specifications) to perform all work in strict accordance with the Base Contract and individual Task Order requirements. The Contractor is required to maintain a local management office in order to receive Request for Proposals (RFPs), sign Task Orders, Notices to Proceed (NTP), process modifications, receive and initiate various contract correspondence, and to provide other engineering and construction management services related to accomplishing individual Task Orders.

3. Subject to Availability of Funds:

FAR Clause 52.232-18 “Availability of Funds,” (APR 1984) Funds are not presently available for this contract. The Government’s obligation under this contract is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for contract purposes can be made. No legal liability on the part of the Government for any payment may arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer for this contract and until the Contractor receives notice of such availability, to be confirmed in writing by the Contracting Officer.

4. Disclosure of the Magnitude of the Seed Project:

In accordance with FAR 36.204 “Disclosure of the Magnitude of Construction Projects,” the magnitude of the Seed Project is estimated between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.

4.5. Government Security Requirements:

The Offeror(s) must ensure that ALL mail sent to the Seattle District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, either pre-contract or post-contract award, has a return mailing address on the outside of the envelope, package, box, etc. ANY MAIL addressed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, including but not limited to; bids, modifications to bids, proposals, revised proposals, bonds, correspondence, etc., will be REJECTED by the US Army Corps of Engineers

W912DW18R0009 Page 3 R0001 mail room facility located in Building 1202, at 4735 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98134 if it does not contain a return mailing address. THERE WILL BE NO EXCEPTIONS.

5.6. Copies of Solicitation Documents and Amendments:

Copies of the solicitation and amendments are available by INTERNET ACCESS ONLY. All solicitation documents will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website at http://www.fbo.gov under solicitation number W912DW18R0009.

It shall be the contractor’s responsibility to check the websites for any amendments. The Offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation.

A list of interested vendors (potential Offerors and subcontractors) is available on the federal business opportunities web site (registration required) is available at: http://www.fbo.gov via Quick Search (Solicitation No.

W912DW18R0009).

Additional information regarding this solicitation and potential Offerors and/or subcontractors is available at http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/BusinessWithUs/Contracting.aspx.

6.7. Offeror’s Questions and Comments:

Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via e-mail or mailed to:

Contract Specialist:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District ATTN: John Scola Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755 Email: John.P.Scola@usace.army.mil

[ATTENTION: I prefer to be contacted by email because I’m hearing impaired]

Contracting Officer:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District ATTN: Martin J. Hansen Phone: (206) 316-3089 Email: Martin.J.Hansen2@usace.army.mil

Note: All questions and/or comments should reach the above referenced Contracting Office no later than three (3) calendar days after the pre-proposal conference, in order that they may be given consideration or actions taken prior to receipt of offers.

Bidder Inquiry

I. Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via

Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet.

a. To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and then click continue.

b. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry.

W912DW18R0009 Page 4 R0001

c. Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

d. The Solicitation Number is: W912DW18R0009.

e. The Bidder Inquiry Key is: EJ3G8V-38U6B9.

II. The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquires 5 calendar days prior to proposal submission in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

III. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

IV. The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

V. Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

7.8. Small Business Size Standard / NAICS Code:

See Section 00 45 00, Provision 52.204-8 for the NAICS code and small business size standard.

8.9. Proposal Expenses and Pre-Award Costs:

This Request for Proposals (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal.

9.10. Access Requirements and Directions:

JBLM is a controlled access installation. In order to gain access to attend the pre-proposal conference and site-visit, a temporary one (1) day vehicle pass is required to drive on JBLM. The pass may be obtained from the Visitor Center at the JBLM Main Gate. Due to heightened security, the following procedures describe how to gain access for yourself and any subcontractors attending (if they or you do not have current access to the military installation):

All attendees must have valid picture identification*. All attendees driving privately-owned vehicles (POVs) must have a valid driver’s license, proof of vehicle insurance and vehicle registration. For rental vehicle access, you must have a rental agreement.

* REAL ID Act: On 1 May 2016, JBLM began enforcing the provisions of the REAL ID Act, passed by Congress in 2005. Under the provisions of this Act, a standard driver’s license or ID card issued by any of the following states is not accepted for unescorted access on JBLM: Minnesota, Missouri and Washington. Persons requesting unescorted access on JBLM and who present a standard license or ID from one of those states will be required to present additional documentation to verify their identity prior to being allowed access on JBLM. The list of acceptable documents to present, along with a standard driver’s license or ID Card issued by one of those states, include: DoD CAC, DoD Uniformed Services Identification and Privileges Cards, U.S. Passport or U.S. Passport Card, VA Issued Health Card, U.S. Coast Guard Merchant Mariner Card, Transportation Worker ID Card (TWIC) issued by DHS, U.S. Government issued, authenticated Federal PIV credentials. US Military or Draft Record containing name and DOB, etc. A full list acceptable identification verification documents accepted can be found at http://www.lewis-mcchord.army.mil/ under ‘Access to JBLM’/’Visitors center’/”Visitor Information”. A state Enhanced Driver’s License (EDL) from Washington State and Minnesota are acceptable for access. Please visit the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) website at https://www.dhs.gov/real-id-frequently-asked-questions for more information regarding REAL ID and frequently asked questions.

W912DW18R0009 Page 5 R0001

DIRECTIONS to Visitor Center / Liberty Gate (Main Gate): From I-5, take Exit 120 (JBLM - Lewis Main) and proceed to the Visitor Center. The Visitor Center is on the far right just before the Main Gate.

DIRECTIONS to Building 2015: From I-5, take Exit 120 (JBLM - Lewis Main) and proceed through Main Gate.

Turn right at the 3rd stop light onto Pendleton Avenue. Building 2015 will be on the left, at the corner of North 4th Street and Pendleton Avenue, next to the Fire Station. Parking is available across the street or at the back or side of the building.

10.11. Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit:

1) Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit: a one-time, pre-proposal conference and site visit for the Seed Project will be conducted on 24 July 2018 at 10:00 am local time, at Building 2015, Conference Room 343, North 4th and Pendleton, JBLM, WA. Offerors and any subcontractors desiring to attend should arrive no later than 10:00 am local time for the pre-proposal conference. The site visit for the Seed Project will immediately follow.

OFFERORS ARE URGED AND EXPECTED to inspect the site where construction is to be performed and to satisfy themselves as to all general and local conditions which may affect the cost of performance of the Contract, to the extent such information is reasonably obtainable. In no event will a failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for withdrawal of an offer after opening or for a claim after award of the Contract.

11.12. Accuracy in Proposals:

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP (including attachments).

The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

12.13. Proposal Submittals

Due to heightened security at Government installations, those Offerors who have their proposals hand-delivered shall contact Procurement Technician, Sonia Frees at 206-764-3516 prior to delivering to the address shown below. At the time specified on the SF1442, it will be announced that receipt of proposals is closed.

Note that the official receipt of a bid shall be in accordance with FAR 52.214-7. Recent terrorist threats have resulted in more time-consuming sign-in and escort procedures and may impact the timely delivery of offers.

See FAR 52.215-1 for rules concerning late proposals.

See Box 13 of the Standard Form 1442 for the time and date your proposal is due.

EMAIL: Emailed Proposal will NOT be accepted.

FAX: Faxed Proposal will NOT be accepted.

FED-EX/UPS: John Scola, Contract Specialist, Building 1202 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District

CECT-NWS

4735 East Marginal Way S., Bldg. #1202 Seattle, WA 98134-2385 Note: Commercial Carriers will not deliver to PO Boxes

MAIL: John Scola, Contract Specialist, Building 1202 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District

CECT-NWS

PO Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755

HAND

W912DW18R0009 Page 6 R0001

DELIVERY: John Scola, Contract Specialist, Building 1202 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District

CECT-NWS

4735 East Marginal Way S., Bldg. #1202 Seattle, WA 98134-2385

The method of Hand Delivery has changed and takes longer than the previous method of arriving at the Federal Center South building (#1201) lobby to deliver your Offer, Bid or Proposal. Please allow sufficient time to allow for heightened security at Government installations and to get to our new location in Oxbow Building #1202. Allow time to park, pass through a metal detector, sign in, and receive a building pass at the Federal Center South Building (#1201). From there, you will be directed to the new USACE Oxbow Building (#1202) which sits behind the Federal Center South Building (#1201). Allow additional time.

Report to the Security Desk in the lobby of the USACE Oxbow Building and call Sonia Frees, Procurement Technician, at 206-674-3516. A Contracting representative will come down and accept your Offer, Bid or Proposal.

Note: If delivery is by any means other than Hand Delivery, please check prior to the due date and time to ensure that your Offer, Bid, or Proposal has arrived on time.

The Packaging that contains the Proposals shall be marked:

“Proposal for Solicitation Number: W912DW18R0009, DO NOT OPEN”

13.14. Proposal Format:

a. Please refer to Section 00 22 16 for Submission Format requirements.

b. Volume 1 - Technical Proposal: Submit one (1) Original printed volume, one copy of printed volume and one (1) Electronic Copy in PDF on a CD (Please combine into one file). Both printed and CD volumes must be identical.

c. Volume 2 - Price proposal and Pro Forma information: Submit one (1) Original printed volume, one copy of printed volume and one (1) Electronic Copy in PDF on a CD. Both must be identical.

d. Volume 3 – Technical Proposal for Seed Project: Submit one (1) Original printed volume, one copy of printed volume and (1) Electronic Copy in PDF on a CD (Please combine into one file). Both printed and CD volumes must be identical.

14.15. Joint Venture Proposal Requirements

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 and the bid bond unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. In addition, a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. If this is an 8(a), SDVOSB or HubZone joint venture, the Offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124, 13 CFR Part 125 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively.

Any of the Joint Venture partners identified in the JV agreement can submit project(s) to meet the requirement in Section 00 22 16 for evaluation.

15.16. Bid Guarantee:

The Standard Form (SF) 24, dated 08/2016, shall be used for the submission of your bid bond and can be obtained from https://www.gsa.gov/reference/forms#SF. Refer to Section 00 22 16 for additional information pertaining to

W912DW18R0009 Page 7 R0001

Bid Bond submission requirements. Submit the original bid bonds with signatures with your proposal.

Facsimile/photocopies of the bonds will be rejected as not acceptable.

16.17. Subcontracting Goals Regarding the Utilization of Small Business Concerns

The clauses listed below apply to all offerors submitting proposals and special attention should be directed to these as incorporated into the Solicitation:

52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns

252.226-7001, Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns

17.18. Solicitation Provisions

See the applicable Provisions for this Solicitation in Section 00 21 00 and Section 00 45 00.

End of Section 00 21 16

W912DW18R0009 Page 1 R0001

EVALUATION FACTORS

SECTION 00 22 16

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARDS

MATOC Multi-Disciplinary Maintenance, Repair, Construction and Incidental Design Work for Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM) Its Sub-Installations and Other Customers Supported within the USACE Seattle

District

1. Introduction.

1.1. Your firm is invited to submit a proposal in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Contract entitled “MATOC Multi-Disciplinary Maintenance, Repair, Construction and Incidental Design Work for Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM), Washington Its Sub-Installations and Other Customers Supported within the USACE Seattle District.” This RFP establishes seed project requirements and provides procedures, format, and other data to assist Offerors in preparing their proposals.

1.2. A target of five (5) Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) type Contracts will be awarded to the offeror(s) submitting a proposal that (a) conforms to this Request for Proposal (RFP), (b) is considered to offer the best value to the Government in terms of the evaluation factors, including price, and (c) is determined to be in the best interest of the Government.

1.3. The IDIQ Contracts to be awarded under this RFP will include a five (5) year Base Period and a two-years Option Period, for a total possible Contract period not-to-exceed seven (7) years. The total capacity of the Base Period plus Option Period shall not exceed $175 million. While the overall capacity of $175 million is not subdivided between Contract periods. Individual Task Orders to be negotiated and awarded under this expected Contract will be firm-fixed price with an anticipated range of $250,000 to $7,000,000 (Please see FAR Clause 52.216-19 within this RFP). The RFP for this requirement is set aside for eligible 8(a) Small Business concerns only. Please see provision 52.204-8 for the NAICS and Small Business Size.

2. Basis of Award.

2.1. Award of the IDIQ Contracts will be made based on the best-value, trade-off source selection process, as outlined in FAR 15.101-1. The Government may award to other than the lowest priced offeror(s) or to other than the highest technically rated offeror(s). The Government will consider trade-offs among price and non-price factors. The non-price factors, when combined, are considered more important than price. The closer the total evaluated non-price ratings are to one another, the greater the importance of the price evaluation in making the best value determination. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award the Contract(s) without discussions.

However, if discussions are necessary, the Contracting Officer will establish a competitive range of the most highly rated proposals and conduct discussions with those Offerors whose proposals have been determined to be within the competitive range. If the Contracting Officer determines the number of proposals which would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. For these reasons, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

2.1.1. Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

• Factor 1 – Relevant Experience of the Prime Offeror

• Factor 2 – Key Personnel

• Factor 3 – Past Performance of the Prime Offeror

2.1.2. Price Evaluation Factor:

• Factor 4 – Price (includes two Sub-factors, as follows):

- Sub-factor 4a – Proposed Field Management Binding Labor Rate Schedule, Binding Capped Indirect Rate Schedule and Binding Maximum Profit Rate.

W912DW18R0009 Page 2 R0001

- Sub-factor 4b – Proposed Seed Project Price

2.2. Summary of Order of Importance for Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

Factor 1 is more important than Factor 2; Factor 2 is more important than Factor 3. When combined, all non-price evaluation factors are more important than price.

2.3. Rating Methodology for Non-Price Evaluation Factor 1 (Relevant Experience of the Prime Offeror) and Non-Price Evaluation Factor 2 (Key Personnel):

Non-Price Evaluation Factors 1 and 2 will be rated using Methodology 2 as outlined in the DoD Source Selection Procedures. Methodology 2 is a combined Technical/Risk Rating and includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Combined technical/risk evaluations will utilize the ratings listed below in “Table 1 – Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method,” and the risk descriptions listed below in “Table 2 – Technical Risk Rating Method.”

Table 1 – Combined Technical/Risk Ratings Method:

Color Rating Adjectival Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the RFP, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is un-awardable.

Table 2 – Technical Risk Rating Method:

Risk Description

Low Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule or degradation of performance. Normal Contractor effort and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule or degradation of performance. Special Contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High

Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special Contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

Unacceptable Proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

W912DW18R0009 Page 3 R0001

2.4. Rating Methodology for Non-Price Evaluation Factor 3 (Past Performance of the Prime Offeror):

Past Performance evaluation will be evaluated using Tables 4 – Past Performance Confidence Rating and Table 5 – Past Performance Relevancy Ratings found below at paragraph 4.2.4.

2.5. Definition of Key Evaluation Terms (Strength, Weakness, & Deficiency):

During evaluations, technical proposals will receive acknowledgment of any significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses and deficiencies. When applying these terms to an aspect(s) of an Offeror’s proposal, evaluators will use the following definitions:

Table 3 – Definitions:

Term Definition

Significant Strength

An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Strength An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during Contract performance.

Weakness A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful Contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

Significant Weakness

A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful Contract performance.

Deficiency A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

3. General Submittal Requirements.

3.1. Offerors submitting proposals for this RFP should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper and bindings, and expensive/extensive visual and other presentation aids are unnecessary.

The Government is specifically interested in the substance of an Offeror’s response.

3.2. Please refer to paragraph 13 of Section 00 21 16 for number of technical and price volumes to submit with your proposal package. Proposals shall be submitted in two separate volumes: (a) Volume 1 – Non-Price Proposal and (b) Volume 2 - Price Proposal. Each page of each volume shall be presented on standard sized 8 ½ x 11-inch paper (to the maximum extent practicable), use font ‘Times New Roman’ or ‘Arial’ (or like font) and be font size 10 or larger.

Volume 1 shall not exceed a total of 40 pages. Should additional pages be submitted, only the first 40 pages will be evaluated. Double sided pages count as 2 pages. If a page is submitted on larger than 8 ½ x 11-inch paper, one side will be counted as two pages. Past Performance Questionnaires and finalized contract performance assessment reports (CPARS) submitted in relation to the Past Performance Factor 3 is not included in the page count. Each Volume shall be submitted in separate, standard letter-size, loose-leaf binders. Contents of binders shall be tabbed and labeled with a Table of Contents for easy identification. The Table of Contents page, cover letter and tab dividers are not included in the page count. Do not incorporate any material by reference. Material presented as such will not be considered for evaluation.

4. Volume 1 – Non-Price Proposal Submittal Requirements:

4.1. Cover Letter: Submit a cover letter as the first page of this volume. The cover letter shall reflect the following information:

a. RFP number.

b. Name, address, e-mail address, and telephone numbers of the firm signing the SF 1442.

W912DW18R0009 Page 4 R0001

c. Names, titles, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers of person(s) authorized to negotiate on the firm's behalf with the Government in connection with this RFP.

d. Name, title, and signature of the person(s) authorized to sign the proposal.

e. A statement specifying agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the RFP and agreement to furnish any and all items upon which prices are offered at the proposed item prices.

f. A statement indicating compliance with all insurance requirements stated herein and that evidence of such will be provided after Contract award.

g. Final Proposal Revisions: If required to submit a Final Proposal Revision following evaluation of initial proposals, the accompanying cover letter must identify all changes made to the firm's initial proposal.

h. Prime Offeror: If the Offeror is submitting as a Joint Venture (JV), the DUNS and CAGE Code for each firm representing the JV must be included.

4.2. Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

4.2.1. Definitions: The following definitions are provided to aid in the preparation of your proposal:

“Construction Renovation, Repair, Alteration, or Upgrade” is defined as construction to, on, or within an existing building, plant, utility, or other structure. Note that the words “Renovation, Repair, Alteration, or Upgrade” may be used interchangeably within this RFP. Construction where an existing, below-ground structure was demolished and either removed or abandoned in place, and a new below-ground structure was built in its place is considered to be “construction renovation, repair, alteration, or upgrade.”

“New Construction” is defined as construction of a building, plant, utility, or other structure in a location where no other building, plant, utility, or other structure exists. Construction where an existing, above-ground structure was demolished and a new above-ground structure was built in its place is considered “new construction.” Building, structure, or utility expansions, where the work only “ties into” an existing building, structure, or utility is considered “new construction.”

“Magnitude” is defined as a project total dollar value. Note that the words “Magnitude or Relevant Size” may be used interchangeably within this RFP. See definition of Relevant Size.

“Project” is defined as a single, stand-alone, site-specific Contract effort. In the case of an Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Contract, work performed on ONE SPECIFIC TASK ORDER would be considered a project. An IDIQ type Contract, in and of itself, is NOT considered a project. NOTE: FOR RÉSUMÉ PURPOSES ONLY under Factor 2, offerors may choose to include an IDIQ Contract as a “project” to demonstrate experience, without describing every Task Order. HOWEVER, the offeror is responsible for ensuring the Government understands each Key Personnel’s overall experience. The Government will not make assumptions. Accordingly, the Offeror is highly encouraged to provide enough detail for the government to understand that experience, to include specific roles performed over the duration of the IDIQ, types and sizes of projects worked on, and any other pertinent information related to the Evaluation Criteria/Method for Factor 2. The Offeror is strongly urged to expand upon key projects/Task Orders worked on to demonstrate specific experience as it relates to the Evaluation Criteria/Method for Factor 2.

“Relevant Experience” Please refer to item 0001 on page 12 for the definition of relevant project experience which is similar in size, scope and complexity to those that may be ordered under this Contract. Relevant Experience is further defined as follows:

Relevant Size:

W912DW18R0009 Page 5 R0001

For evaluation purposes, a relevant project with a total dollar value that falls close to or within the dollar value range of task orders anticipated to be executed under the resulting Contract ($250K - $7M) is considered relevant, provided the project meets the other relevant criteria for scope and complexity. Projects less than $250K will not be considered relevant. Relevant projects valued between $5M and $7M will be considered a strength.

Relevant Scope and Complexity:

Experience with multi-disciplinary construction activities for renovations, repairs, upgrades, and alterations of real property. Examples include the following: Renovation, repairs, upgrades, or alterations to building or plant structural systems, mechanical systems, HVAC systems, fire suppression systems, fire alarm systems, electrical systems, communication line systems; Renovations, repairs, upgrades, or alterations to infrastructure projects, such as roadways, airfields, underground utilities, overhead utilities, and electrical distribution systems.

4.2.2. Factor 1 – Relevant Experience of the Prime Offeror:

Submittal Requirements:

For this criterion, the Offeror shall submit a minimum of four (4) and up to six (6) projects for the Prime Offeror to demonstrate relevant experience. If more than six projects are submitted, only the first six will be evaluated, starting with the most recently completed and working backwards in time. Each project example shall demonstrate relevant experience to the proposed acquisition, with “relevant experience” as defined above. All projects submitted for this criterion must have been completed (Beneficial Occupancy Date established) within the last six years from the date this solicitation was issued. In addition, offerors should clearly explain how the information provided demonstrates relevant experience to the proposed acquisition. Please refer to Evaluation Method below for more details.

NOTE TO OFFEROR: Projects submitted under this Factor 1 must have been performed by the firm submitting an offer for this solicitation (same CAGE Codes and DUNS numbers). Projects performed by a parent company, sister company, teaming partner, affiliate or business other than the specific firm submitting an offer for this solicitation will not be evaluated.

PROJECTS SUBMITTED BY JOINT VENTURES (J-V): Offerors must include at least one project completed by each of the companies representing the JV agreement. These projects must have been performed by a member of the JV submitting an offer for this solicitation (i.e., same CAGE codes and DUNS numbers). Projects submitted by an entity of the JV must be performed by that entity and not part of another JV agreement between that entity and a different firm other than the other entity proposed in the JV. Projects submitted that were completed by the JV firm count as a project for each firm within the JV agreement, but would only count as one project toward the overall five project maximum for this factor.

Offerors are advised that very little “new construction” will be performed under the resulting Contract. Instead, as much as 95% of the projects executed against this Contract will be for the renovation, repair, or upgrade to existing structures/facilities. Accordingly, for purposes of this evaluation, PROJECTS DEMONSTRATING NEW CONSTRUCTION ONLY, as defined above, WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR EVALUATION.

Offerors are advised to submit RENOVATION projects that demonstrate relevant experience to the proposed acquisition. Any project submitted that contains both Renovation AND New Construction elements must include a detailed explanation of the extent of renovation work, to include how the project meets the definition of “relevant experience”. In these cases, the Government may consider a project to demonstrate relevant experience if the offeror can demonstrate that the majority of work on that project was for renovation; however, it is the Offeror’s responsibility to provide enough detail for the Government to make that determination.

For each project provided to demonstrate the above experience, provide the following information:

a) Project Title, Location, and Customer

b) Project Type (e.g. Renovation/Repair or Renovation with New Construction)

c) Total Dollar Value of Entire Project

W912DW18R0009 Page 6 R0001

d) Start & Completion Dates (Month/Year)

e) Description of Project - Describe the specific elements of work performed and how this work is relevant to

Task Orders to be awarded as a result of this RFP. For any project submitted that contains any element of new construction, the offeror must include a detailed explanation of the extent of renovation work, to include how the project meets the definition of “relevant experience.”

f) Role of Prime Offeror (Prime or Subcontractor) - If you performed the project as a subcontractor, you must address the elements of work performed, as well as the dollar value and percentage performed of the total project.

g) Awards or recognition received (if applicable).

h) Customer Point of Contact - Name, relationship to project, agency/firm, city, state, and current phone number and email. If you performed as a subcontractor, the Prime Contractor can serve as your ‘Customer.’

Evaluation Method:

Offerors will be evaluated based on the extent of their experience in performing relevant renovation projects, as defined above. Note that these are NOT minimum requirements; however, the more experience demonstrated in each of the following, the higher the rating that may be assigned during evaluations:

a) Experience executing a variety of types of construction renovation/repair projects including work on the following: building or plant structural systems, mechanical systems, HVAC systems, fire suppression systems, fire alarm systems, electrical systems, communication line systems, infrastructure projects, such as roadways, airfields, underground utilities, overhead utilities, electrical distribution systems, and incidental design.

b) Experience managing multiple, concurrent projects.

c) Experience with multiple projects working on a military installation. (Note: VA or other buildings not located within the confinement/borders of a Department of Defense Compound are not considered a ‘military installation’).

d) Experience with projects containing historical building renovations

e) Experience with projects containing Anti-Terrorism and Force Protection (ATFP).

f) Experience with projects which include experience in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design

(LEED), Low Impact Development (LID), Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA), Energy Policy Act (EPAct). Additional credit will be given to projects with LEED certification.

g) Multiple project experience with incidental design to include design-build projects.

Based on the Government’s evaluation of the Offeror’s submission in response to this factor, the Offeror will be assigned a rating for this factor based on Table 1 above.

4.2.3. Factor 2 – Key Personnel:

Submittal Requirements:

Provide the names and resume(s) of key construction personnel that will be assigned to this contract in the required format shown at the end of this factor for each of the key personnel listed below. The Offeror should provide a summary of the roles and responsibilities of these individuals for each key construction personnel. The years stated are the minimum requirement. Include a resume for each of the following key personnel:

1. The Project General Manager (the individual or individuals in YOUR COMPANY who will lead all the personnel under the resulting Contract) shall possess either of the following qualifications:

i. A Baccalaureate or higher degree in engineering, architecture, or construction management and ten years of experience as a General Project Manager or Project Manager simultaneously managing multiple construction projects.

OR

W912DW18R0009 Page 7 R0001

ii. Fifteen years of experience as a General Project Manager or Project Manager simultaneously managing multiple construction projects.

2. The Project Manager (the individual or individuals in YOUR COMPANY who will lead the effort on individual Task Orders) shall possess either of the following qualifications:

i. A Baccalaureate or higher degree in engineering, architecture, or construction management and five years of experience as a Project Manager simultaneously managing multiple construction projects.

ii. Ten years of experience as a Project Manager simultaneously managing multiple construction projects.

3. The Corporate Safety Manager (the individual or individuals in YOUR COMPANY responsible for Safety on a Corporate level) shall possess either of the following qualifications:

i. A Baccalaureate or higher degree in engineering, architecture, construction management, or construction safety related and five years of experience working as a project safety officer (or in a position with equivalent responsibilities) simultaneously managing multiple construction projects.

ii. Ten years of experience working as a project safety officer (or in a position with equivalent responsibilities) simultaneously managing multiple construction projects.

4. The On-Site Quality Control (QC) Manager (the individual or individuals in YOUR COMPANY responsible for QC performance under the resulting Contract) shall possess either of the following qualifications:

i. A Baccalaureate or higher degree in engineering, architecture, construction management, or construction industry and five years of experience working as a quality control manager (or in a position with equivalent responsibilities) simultaneously managing multiple construction projects.

ii. Ten years of experience working as a quality control manager (or in a position with equivalent responsibilities) simultaneously managing multiple construction projects.

5. The On-Site Construction Superintendent (the individual or individuals in YOUR COMPANY assigned to Task Orders under the resulting Contract) shall possess either of the following qualifications:

i. A degree or certificate in architecture, engineering, or construction management and four years of experience as a Construction Superintendent.

ii. Ten years construction experience in which at least five years were experience as a Construction Superintendent.

REQUIRED RESUME FORMAT:

a) Name and Title

b) Proposed Duties/Function for this project

c) Affiliation with Offeror and Years Affiliated with Offeror

d) Months/Years of Experience performing duties/functions as proposed for this project

e) Education – School attended, Degree, Certification, Year, and Specialization

f) List Active Registrations (Professional or Technical Licenses/Certifications)

W912DW18R0009 Page 8 R0001

g) Describe Specific Qualifications for this project and how they meet the required qualifications

h) List Projects worked on to include:

1. Project Title and Location

2. Date of project (month/year project began and ended)

3. Name of firm performing the project (and employing this individual)

4. Brief description of project, to include size, scope, and Complexity (be sure to identify relevancy to the work to be ordered under this resultant Contract, if applicable)

5. Duties/Functions/Areas of responsibility (e.g. trade, discipline, features, etc.)

6. Current Point of Contact for the firm performing the project and employing this individual. If unavailable, indicate why.

The Contractor agrees to assign those key persons whose resumes were submitted with their proposal to Task Orders issued under this Contract. No substitutions shall be made except in accordance with this paragraph.