Attachment_1_Haz_Bldg_Matl_Survey_578.pdf

HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY

Renovation Specific

Repair Child Development Center, Building 578 Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington 98433

Prepared for

Ms. Elise Hanson Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

33301 Ninth Avenue South, Suite 300 Tacoma, Washington 98003-2600

Telephone: 206-431-2318

Prepared by

Med-Tox Northwest Post Office Box 1446

Auburn, Washington 98071-1446 Telephone: 253-351-0677

Project No. A-7760.7

Anthony Fullerton AHERA BI #148565 Exp. 10/1/2015

Hazardous Building Materials Survey — Child Development Center, Building 578

December 5, 2014 i Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Table of Contents

Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ iii Survey Summary

Structure and Site Information General and Structural Heating and Mechanical Systems Architectural Finishes

Asbestos Summary Surfacing Materials Thermal System Insulation Miscellaneous Materials

Coatings Survey Summary Coatings Survey Waste Designation Survey

Other Hazardous Building Materials Mold PCB Light Ballasts and Fluorescent Light Tubes

Laboratory Analytical Methods

Asbestos-Containing Materials Lead-Based Paint

Comments and Recommendations

Asbestos-Containing Materials Lead-Based Paint PCBs Mold Other Hazardous Building Materials

Limitations

Appendix A AHERA Building Inspector and WDOC Lead-Based Paint Inspector Certificates ................................................................................................................ A

Appendix B Building and Asbestos Materials Photographic Documentation ................... B

Appendix C Summary of Materials Sampled for Asbestos .............................................. C

Appendix D National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program Certificate ................ D

Appendix E Analytical Report – Asbestos ....................................................................... E

Appendix F Analytical Report – Lead .............................................................................. F

Appendix G EMSL Laboratories, Inc. Certification ......................................................... G

Appendix H Sample Locations Drawings ........................................................................ H

December 5, 2014 ii Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Tables

Table 1. Summary of Asbestos-Containing Materials

Table 2. Summary of Suspect Materials Determined Non-Asbestos

Table 3. Summary of Paint Chip (coatings) Sampling

Table 4. Summary of Fluorescent, HID, and Exit Lights

December 5, 2014 iii Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Acronyms

AAS atomic absorption spectroscopy ACM asbestos-containing materials AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act ASHARA Asbestos Schools Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act ASTM American Society of Testing and Materials CFR Code of Federal Regulation CMU concrete masonry unit DEHP Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate DOSH Department of Occupational Safety and Health EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency HM homogeneous material HGA homogeneous area LBP lead-based paint LF lineal feet mg/cm2 milligrams per square centimeter mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mg/L milligrams per Liter MTNW Med-Tox Northwest NVLAP National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PCB polychlorinated biphenyl Pb Lead PLM polarized light microscopy ppm parts per million PSCAA Puget Sound Clean Air Agency PVC poly vinyl chlorinated RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act SF square feet TCLP toxicity characteristic leaching procedure TSI thermal system insulation WAC Washington Administration Code WDOC State of Washington Department of Commerce WISHA Washington Industrial Safety and Health Administration XRF X-ray fluorescence

December 5, 2014 1 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Survey Summary

On October 28, 2014, Anthony Fullerton of Med-Tox Northwest (MTNW) conducted a renovation specific hazardous building materials (HBM) survey of Building 578 located at McChord Field at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), Washington. The survey included asbestos, lead-based paint (LBP), and other potential HBM such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFC), polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) light ballasts and mercury-containing fluorescent tubes and/or thermostats that will be impacted by replacement or repair of the existing fire suppression system. This survey was performed for the following renovation items:

“Prepare a facility renovation/restoration design to include finishes, HVAC, EMCS, plumbing, electrical, communication, life/safety, fire alarm/mass notification and fire suppression, ABA/ADA accessibility standards, Anti- Terrorism/Force Protection improvements including glass block and window replacement, evaluate exterior lighting levels and exterior signage and repair to meet current requirements, perform energy modeling. As a part of the renovation, correct all deficiencies identified in FY13 Risk Management checklist and CY14 Corrective Action Report.”

This survey consisted of a visual inspection, touching of suspect materials and sample collection with analysis. As-built drawings were available and reviewed as part of this survey report; no existing hazardous material survey reports were available. Copies of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) building inspector certificates and State of Washington Department of Commerce (WDOC) lead-based paint accreditation for Region 10 are included in Appendix A.

Structure and Site Information General and Structural

Building 578 is a one story structure constructed in 1994 that is approximately 22,000 square feet in size. The building is constructed slab-on grade with brick exterior walls and cement panels. Floors are bare concrete. The roof of the building is pitched and is covered with three-tab composition shingles and black tar paper. The exterior windows are metal framed as are the doors. Exterior surfaces are painted beige (yellowish color) with various colors of brown trim.

The facility is set-up with multiple modules, or classrooms. There is a front administration area with offices and a receiving desk. The facility has its own kitchen and laundry areas.

Photographic documentation of the building and its major systems described herein are provided in Appendix B.

December 5, 2014 2 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Heating and Mechanical Systems

Heat exchangers and hot water tanks in the mechanical room supply hot water throughout the building. Med-Tox Northwest inspected pipe systems throughout and was determined that all water pipes are insulated with fiberglass pipe insulation and PVC fittings. Pipe chases and areas above suspended ceiling tile systems had the same materials. All of the insulation in the mechanical room is fiberglass.

Architectural Finishes

Walls: Finishes on interior walls is primarily painted gypsum drywall systems throughout the building. Bathrooms and laundry facilities have the similar finishes. The kitchen also has gypsum drywall systems. The kitchen, storage area, laundry room and restrooms have wall laminate glued down over the gypsum wallboard system.

Ceilings: The main ceiling throughout most of the building consists of suspended 2-x 4-foot or 2-x 2-foot acoustical ceiling tiles (ACT) in a metal t-grid system. There were several ceiling types observed that include random crater and pin holes pattern and solid gypsum.

Floor Systems

The flooring throughout the building consists of carpet squares glued down to the concrete substrate in most spaces. The exception to this is a small section in each classroom, kitchen, laundry room, restrooms and storage room which have sheet vinyl flooring.

Asbestos Summary The AHERA regulation, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 763, is the primary governing regulation when performing asbestos surveys. This regulation was originally enacted for school buildings, but has since been applied to public and commercial buildings by the Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA) in 1994 and by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) worker protection regulations in 1995, specifically 29 CFR 1926.1101(k).

PSCAA also requires compliance with AHERA’s survey and sampling requirements.

This applies to any renovation or demolition activities where suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) may be disturbed. PSCAA is a local agency that receives statutory authority from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to enforce environmental regulations.

AHERA divides suspect ACM into three categories; “surfacing materials” (i.e., sprayed fireproofing, popcorn ceiling texture, etc.), “thermal system insulation” (TSI) (i.e., pipe or building insulation, etc.), and “miscellaneous materials” (i.e., flooring material, roofing, construction mastics, etc.). Building 578 was surveyed for these materials and sampled

December 5, 2014 3 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

as required (total of 53 samples). For a complete listing of suspect materials sampled, see Appendix C.

Table 1 below provides a summary of asbestos materials identified in Building 578 from the results of sampling by MTNW.

Table 1. Summary of Asbestos-Containing Materials

Material Location Friable Quantity Building 578 There were no asbestos-containing materials identified.

Note: This table is not to be used without the complete survey document including appendices for additional information.

Homogeneous material (HM) descriptions in the following text are provided to help correlate material descriptions provided in Appendix C.

There are no asbestos-containing materials as defined by PSCAA and AHERA found in the building. All materials were analyzed to be negative for asbestos.

Surfacing Materials There were two surfacing materials observed in the building, as defined by 40

CFR 763.86

§ Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wall board system HM01. This material was located on the interior walls of the building. Med-Tox Northwest collected nine samples of this material and analyzed them for asbestos content; asbestos was not detected in any of the samples.

§ Light orange peel textured gypsum wall board system HM02. This material was located on some of the interior walls of the kitchen and laundry room. Med-Tox Northwest collected three samples of this material and analyzed them for asbestos content; asbestos was not detected in any of the samples.

Thermal System Insulation § Insulation on hot water storage tanks and heat exchangers in the mechanical room was observed as fiberglass insulation.

§ All pipe work observed was either void of insulation or had fiberglass wrap and fittings. Three samples of the pipe fitting and duct wrap sealant HM10 was collected and analyzed for asbestos content; all samples were determined to be negative by laboratory analysis.

December 5, 2014 4 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Miscellaneous Materials § Blue 4-inch cove base and white adhesive HM03. This material is located throughout the facility. Three samples were collected of this material and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected.

§ White 4-inch cove base and white adhesive HM04. This material is located in the classroom and is typically associated with the sheet vinyl flooring in the building.

Three samples were collected of this material and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected.

§ White sheet vinyl flooring with blue and pink speckles HM05. This material was identified in the restrooms, classrooms, kitchen and laundry room of the facility.

Three samples were collected of this material and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected.

§ Carpet mastic HM06. This material was identified under the carpet throughout the facility. Three samples were collected of this material and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected.

§ 2- x 4-foot ACT in 2-x 2-foot pattern with random crater and pinholes HM07. This ceiling tile was observed throughout most of the building. Three samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected.

§ 2-x 2-foot ACT smooth finish, heavy gypsum HM08. This ceiling tile was observed throughout most of the building. Three samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected.

§ Gray duct sealant HM09. The ductwork for the building runs primarily above the drop ceiling. This material was observed on some of the seams of the ducting.

Three samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected.

§ Exterior window and door frame caulk HM11. This material is located around the aluminum exterior window and door frames. Three samples were collected of this material and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected.

§ Exterior brick mortar HM12. The lower exterior walls are constructed of brick and mortar. Three samples were collected of the brick mortar and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected.

§ Three-tab composition roofing HM13. This material is found on the roof of the building. Three samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected in any of the samples collected.

§ Vapor Barrier HM14. This material is found on the roof of the building under the three-tab composition roofing. Three samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected in any of the samples collected.

December 5, 2014 5 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

§ Drivit panels HM15. Located on the exterior above the red brick. Three samples were collected of this material and analyzed for asbestos content; no asbestos was detected.

§ Gray sink undercoat HM16. Most of the sinks located in building are part of cabinet systems that are locked. There were several unlocked so sampling sink undercoating was permissible. These sinks were observed to have gray undercoating on them. Samples of the undercoating on the sinks located in room 220 and the storage room were collected and analyzed for asbestos content; both samples were determined to be negative for asbestos. The scope of work identifies the replacement of child sink faucets in the classrooms. Although not expected to contain asbestos, if the sink is to be removed, additional sampling by an AHERA building inspector will be required.

Table 2 below lists all suspect materials that have been determined non-asbestos.

Table 2. Summary of Suspect Materials Determined Non-Asbestos

Building 578 Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

4-inch blue cove base and mastic

Light orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

White sheet vinyl flooring with blue and pink speckles

4-inch white cove base and mastic Carpet mastic Pipe and duct wrap mastic 2-x 2-foot ACT smooth finish, heavy gypsum Gray duct sealant Drivit panels Exterior brick mortar Vapor barrier Three-tab composition roofing 2-x-4 foot ACT in 2-x 2- foot random crater and pin hole pattern Exterior window and door frame sealant Gray sink undercoat Note: This table is not to be used without the complete survey document including appendices for additional information.

Coatings Survey Summary Lead was commonly used in most paint products until 1978, when it was banned from residential paints at concentrations greater than 600 parts per million (ppm); however, commercial applications with lead were still utilized and available. Lead is poisonous to the human body and presents a potential health hazard during any kind of disturbance (such as maintenance, including grinding, welding, and cutting) and if improperly disposed, where lead can enter drinking water supplies.

EPA defines lead-based paint (LBP) as a concentration of 1.0 milligram per centimeter squared (mg/cm2) or greater by X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) or 0.5 percent by weight or greater by total lead analysis (equivalent to 5,000 ppm). This EPA action level triggers

December 5, 2014 6 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

requirements for protection of the environment, maintenance workers, and building occupants. It also triggers training and certification requirements for inspectors, project designers, contractors, supervisors, and workers. Although the training requirements only apply to certain residential structures at this time, they could apply to this type of property sometime in the future.

The OSHA construction standard (worker protection regulations) however, has not defined a minimum level for regulating lead, and has clarified that lead at any detectable level shall be considered regulated. The specific OSHA regulation that pertains to lead exposure in construction is 29 CFR 1926.62 Lead. The Washington Industrial Safety and Health Administration (WISHA) worker protection regulations, WAC 296-155-176, are virtually the same as 29 CFR 1926.62. The presence of lead in paint at any level triggers these worker protection requirements.

Coatings Survey Building 578 paint coatings were surveyed for the presence of lead. During the survey, areas of coatings with homogenous color, texture, and apparent age were identified.

One to three coating samples were collected from each homogenous area (HGA) for analytical analysis (lead only).

1. Exterior paint is gray with dark brown trim.

2. Interior paint is primarily white throughout. Doors are painted an off-white beige color. The metal door frames are painted in a variety of colors.

For a list of all materials sampled for lead, refer to Table 3 below:

Table 3. Summary of Paint Chip (coatings) Sampling

Sample Location Color Substrate Component Results in % Wt

7760.7-578-01PB Mechanical room

White GWB Wall <0.012

7760.7-578-02PB Hallway White Textured

GWB

Wall <0.010

7760.7-578-03PB Laundry Pink GWB Wall <0.012 7760.7-578-04PB Staff office Pink Textured

GWB

Wall <0.014

7760.7-578-05PB Exterior Beige Drivit Wall <0.010 GWB= gypsum wallboard, %wt= percent in weight. Bolded values – bulk paint chip samples with lead detected above the laboratory reporting limit have been bolded. OSHA worker protection regulations have stated that lead at any detectable concentration shall be considered regulated per 29 CFR 1926.62.

December 5, 2014 7 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Waste Designation Survey Waste designation sampling has not been performed due to the limited nature of demolition associated with this project; however, bulk paint chip sampling results indicate that paint in the building has low levels of lead content and most likely would not fail waste designation even if removed as a single waste stream. Based on Table 3 results above, MTNW does not anticipate dangerous waste associated with painted surfaces in the building; rather, the debris will designate as construction debris.

WAC 173-303 Dangerous Waste Regulations defines hazardous waste as it relates to lead by toxicity as 5.0 milligrams per Liter (mg/L) by Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).

Other Hazardous Building Materials

Mold

MTNW observed water intrusion in multiple locations around the exterior of the building along the soffit and drivit wall panels. Based on this type of construction and from documented issues with similar type structures, there is a high probability that fungi growth is present on the GWB layer behind it.

Throughout the hallways, there are multiple indications of leaking pipes mainly from water stained acoustical ceiling tiles, but no visible mold colonization. MTNW recommends repair of the failing pipe systems and replacement of any damaged building materials. If mold colonization is discovered during the repair/replacement process, remediate as required.

PCB Light Ballasts and Fluorescent Light Tubes

All of the light fixtures in the building were installed in 1994 or later. Nearly all ballasts manufactured after 1979 do not contain PCBs. Ballasts manufactured after 1978 may contain a PCB replacement called Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a probable human carcinogen. Light fixture ballasts scheduled for replacement should be collected and sent to a certified recycling/disposal facility.

All fluorescent light fixtures scheduled for replacement should be assumed to contain mercury-containing light tubes and recycled as a universal waste. Table 4 provides a summary of these items in the building:

December 5, 2014 8 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Table 4. Summary of Fluorescent, HID, and Exit Lights.

Location Exit signs 8-foot, 1-bulb

4-foot, 3-bulb

4-foot, 2-bulb

4-foot, 1-bulb

2-foot, 3-bulb

Building 578 Interior 6 4 94 22 8 2 Total 6 4 94 22 8 2

Typically, there is one ballast for every two light tubes in a fluorescent light fixture;

accordingly, there are approximately 226 ballasts in the light fixtures requiring recycling or PCB hazardous waste disposal. There are also approximately 334, four-foot light tubes, six (6), two-foot light tubes and four (4), eight-foot light tubes that will need to be recycled.

Laboratory Analytical Methods

Asbestos-Containing Materials

Fifty three (53) suspect asbestos bulk samples were collected as part of this survey.

Bulk samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) dispersion staining EPA Method 600/R-93/116 by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC. Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC is accredited through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) of the U. S. Department of Commerce. This accreditation does not constitute endorsement, but rather a finding of laboratory competence. Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC participant number is 200768-0 (certifications in Appendix D). A copy of the laboratory analytical report is provided in Appendix E.

Lead-Based Paint Bulk paint chip samples were submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. for analysis. A total of five (5) paint chip samples were analyzed for lead using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) to determine the presence and percentage of lead. Procedures for analyzing metals are found in the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) D-3335-78 and EPA Method Manual SW-846, Method 6010B (EMSL Analytical Inc. used Method

SW-846 3050B/7000B).

Analytical results are provided in Appendix F. EMSL Laboratories, Inc., laboratory certifications are provided in Appendix G.

Sample locations drawings are provided in Appendix H.

December 5, 2014 9 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Comments and Recommendations

Asbestos-Containing Materials There were no asbestos-containing materials identified during the survey.

We recommend that this survey report be placed on-site during renovation and/or selective demolition and copies provided to the contractor(s) bidding and performing work. Washington Industrial Safety and Health Administration (WISHA), OSHA and PSCAA require that the report be on-site and available for review during the entire project duration.

Additional destructive investigation and sampling will be required prior to and during renovation activities including, but not limited to the following:

1. Due to current occupancy, extensive destructive investigation could not be performed; however, due to the type of building construction there are minimal locations where suspect asbestos materials may be present. If additional suspect materials are observed during the course of the renovation they will require sampling by an AHERA inspector and laboratory analysis.

2. Any door and door frames impacted as part of this project are assumed asbestos-containing and will require inspection by an accredited AHERA building inspector or abatement contractor before disturbance.

3. This investigation did not include subsurface materials that may contain asbestos.

4. The wall laminate located in various locations of the building was in good condition so access to the mastic adhering it to the wall was not possible without damaging the finish. Although this material is not expected or assumed to contain asbestos it must be sampled prior to any action that will impact it.

5. Due to occupancy, electrical systems were not tested. Based on year of construction and visual observations, it is unlikely that asbestos is present; however, testing and verification by an AHERA building inspector will be required for any electrical components scheduled for modification or demolition.

§ The scope of work identifies the replacement of child sink faucets in the classrooms.

Although not expected to contain asbestos, if the sink is to be removed, additional sampling by an AHERA building inspector will be required.

December 5, 2014 10 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Lead-Based Paint

All painted surfaces were tested and found to contain levels of lead in paint less than the level of detection for the analytical method. It is, however; best work practice to comply with 29 CFR 1926.62 and WAC 296-155-176 during any disturbance of painted surfaces. This recommendation applies to all construction trades impacting painted surfaces.

Based on paint chip sampling it is highly unlikely that construction debris will designate as dangerous or hazardous waste. MTNW recommends sampling construction debris by TCLP during construction and once the waste stream has been determined.

PCBs

Light fixtures in the building were installed in 1994 or later and will not have PCB light ballasts. The scope of work did not include testing caulking, paints, or other building materials for PCB content but considering the year of construction for both the original and additions, it is unlikely that PCBs are present in these materials.

Fluorescent light fixtures scheduled for replacement should have ballasts and light tubes removed and recycled accordingly.

Mold

Moisture intrusion is present at multiple locations on the exterior of the building associated with the drivit soffits and wall panels. Visible mold colonization was not observed; however, based on knowledge gained from similarly constructed buildings there is a high probability that fungi growth is present behind these components.

MTNW recommends correction of all moisture intrusion areas and remediating mold colonization in a controlled manner in accordance with industry standards.

Other Hazardous Building Materials No other suspect hazardous building materials were observed that will affect the scope of this renovation.

December 5, 2014 11 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Limitations

A good faith effort has been made to identify ACM, LBP, and other HBM for the renovation project. This survey was performed for a specific renovation and not for complete demolition of the building. Additionally, the building was occupied during the survey. Additional destructive investigation and sampling will be required depending on inaccessible building systems including mechanical spaces and/or mechanical/electrical system routing.

Sampling was performed consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professionals currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

and its’ designates for this project only. The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are based on conditions encountered at the time of our study and our experience and judgment. MTNW cannot be held responsible for interpretation by others of the data contained in this report; any use of this report shall include the entire document. This survey is not intended for use as abatement plans and/or specifications which MTNW recommends for regulatory compliance.

December 5, 2014 A Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Appendix A AHERA Building Inspector and WDOC Lead-

Based Paint Inspector Certificates

December 5, 2014 B Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Appendix B Building and Asbestos Materials

Photographic Documentation

Photo 1: Exterior of Building 578

Photo 2: Typical exterior finishes include brick and mortar walls with drivit panel soffits.

Photo 3: Example of water intrusion on the soffit. The paint has delaminated from the substrate.

Photo 4: Mildew and staining on exterior finishes.

Photo 5: Typical finishes found in the mechanical room. The pipes are insulated with Non asbestos-containing fiberglass lagging and PVC fittings.

Photo 6: Typical finishes found in the hallway. All suspect materials were determined to be non asbestos-containing.

Photo 7: Staining on ACT in the hallways. This was observed in many locations.

Photo 8: Typical finishes observed in the kitchen area. All materials sampled were determined to be negative for asbestos.

Photo 9: Typical pipe systems and mechanical units located above the drop ceiling in the hallways. The pipes are insulated with fiberglass lagging and the fittings covered with fiberglass and PVC.

December 5, 2014 C Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Appendix C Summary of Materials Sampled for Asbestos

Hazardous Building Materials Survey — McChord Field Child Development Center Building 578

October 2014 Appendix C-1 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Table C-1. Summary of Materials Sampled for Asbestos

Sample Material Location AHERA Type HM Result 7760.7-578-01 Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Hall to the north of room 228 by ext door

Surfacing 01 ND

7760.7-578-02 Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Room 220 Surfacing 01 ND

7760.7-578-03 Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Hallway outside of Room 219

Surfacing 01 ND

7760.7-578-04 Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Room 218-storage

Surfacing 01 ND

7760.7-578-05 Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Hall outside of kitchen

Surfacing 01 ND

7760.7-578-06 Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Room 203 Surfacing 01 ND

7760.7-578-07 Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Room 211 Surfacing 01 ND

7760.7-578-08 Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Office Surfacing 01 ND

7760.7-578-09 Heavy orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Hall by east exit Surfacing 01 ND

7760.7-578-10 Light orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Kitchen Surfacing 02 ND

7760.7-578-11 Light orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Kitchen Surfacing 02 ND

7760.7-578-12 Light orange peel textured gypsum wallboard system

Laundry Surfacing 02 ND

7760.7-578-13 4-inch blue cove base and mastic

Hallway by northwest exit

Misc. 03 ND

7760.7-578-14 4-inch blue cove base and mastic

Hall outside of Room 219

Misc. 03 ND

7760.7-578-15 4-inch blue cove base and mastic

Hallway by southeast exit

Misc. 03 ND

7760.7-578-16 4-inch white cove base and mastic

Office Misc. 04 ND

October 2014 Appendix C-2 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

7760.7-578-17 4-inch white cove base and mastic Room 204 Misc. 04 ND

7760.7-578-18 4-inch white cove base and mastic

Room 220 Misc. 04 ND

7760.7-578-19 White sheet vinyl flooring with blue and pink speckle

Room 220 Misc. 05 ND

7760.7-578-20 White sheet vinyl flooring with blue and pink speckle

Room 205 Misc. 05 ND

7760.7-578-21 White sheet vinyl flooring with blue and pink speckle

Storage Misc. 05 ND

7760.7-578-22 Carpet mastic North hallway Misc. 06 ND 7760.7-578-23 Carpet mastic Office Misc. 06 ND 7760.7-578-24 Carpet mastic Administrators office/hallway Misc. 06 ND

7760.7-578-25 2-x 4-foot ACT in 2-x 2-foot pattern with random crater and pin holes

Conference room

Misc. 07 ND

7760.7-578-26 2-x 4-foot ACT in 2-x 2-foot pattern with random crater and pin holes

North hall Misc. 07 ND

7760.7-578-27 2-x 4-foot ACT in 2-x 2-foot pattern with random crater and pin holes

South hall Misc. 07 ND

7760.7-578-28 2-x 2-foot ACT smooth finish heavy gypsum

Kitchen Misc. 08 ND

7760.7-578-29 2-x 2-foot ACT smooth finish heavy gypsum

Kitchen Misc. 08 ND

7760.7-578-30 2-x 2-foot ACT smooth finish heavy gypsum

Laundry Misc. 08 ND

7760.7-578-31 Gray duct sealant Hallway Misc. 09 ND 7760.7-578-32 Gray duct sealant Mechanical Misc. 09 ND 7760.7-578-33 Gray duct sealant Mechanical Misc. 09 ND 7760.7-578-34 Pipe and duct wrap mastic Mechanical TSI 10 ND

7760.7-578-35 Pipe and duct wrap mastic

Mechanical TSI 10 ND

7760.7-578-36 Pipe and duct wrap mastic

Mechanical TSI 10 ND

7760.7-578-37 Exterior window and door frame caulk

Exterior Misc. 11 ND

7760.7-578-38 Exterior window and door frame caulk

Exterior Misc. 11 ND

October 2014 Appendix C-3 Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

7760.7-578-39 Exterior window and door frame caulk Exterior Misc. 11 ND

7760.7-578-40 Exterior brick mortar Exterior Misc. 12 ND 7760.7-578-41 Exterior brick mortar Exterior Misc. 12 ND 7760.7-578-42 Exterior brick mortar Exterior Misc. 12 ND 7760.7-578-43 3-tab composition roofing Exterior Misc. 13 ND 7760.7-578-44 3-tab composition roofing Exterior Misc. 13 ND 7760.7-578-45 3-tab composition roofing Exterior Misc. 13 ND 7760.7-578-46 Vapor barrier Exterior Misc. 14 ND 7760.7-578-47 Vapor barrier Exterior Misc. 14 ND 7760.7-578-48 Vapor barrier Exterior Misc. 14 ND 7760.7-578-49 Drivit panels Exterior Misc. 15 ND 7760.7-578-50 Drivit panels Exterior Misc. 15 ND 7760.7-578-51 Drivit panels Exterior Misc. 15 ND 7760.7-578-52 Gray sink under coat Room 220 Misc. 16 ND 7760.7-578-53 Gray sink under coat Storage Misc. 16 ND HM = homogeneous material, Misc. = miscellaneous, ND = none detected, TSI = thermal system insulation

December 5, 2014 G Berger/ABAM Engineers, Inc.

Appendix D National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation

Program Certificate

Appendix E Analytical Report – Asbestos

Appendix F Analytical Report – Lead

ConcentrationAnalyzed RDL LeadClient SampleDescription Collected

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

2001 East 52nd St., Indianapolis, IN 46205

Phone/Fax: (317) 803-2997 / (317) 803-3047 http://www.EMSL.com indianapolislab@emsl.com

Attn: Anthony Fullerton Med-Tox Northwest PO Box 1446 Auburn, WA 98071

Received: 10/30/14 10:10 AM

7760.7 Bldg. 578

Fax: (253) 351-0688 Phone: (253) 351-0677

Project:

10/28/2014Collected:

161416735 CustomerID: MEDT50 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Site: Mechanical Rm -White On GWB Wall <0.012 % wt10/31/2014

161416735-0001 0.01210/28/20147760.7-578-01Pb % wt

Site: Hallway - White On TXT GWB Wall <0.010 % wt10/31/2014

161416735-0002 0.01010/28/20147760.7-578-02Pb % wt

Site: Laundry - Pink On GWB Wall <0.012 % wt10/31/2014

161416735-0003 0.01210/28/20147760.7-578-03Pb % wt

Site: Staff Office - Pink On TXT GWB Wall <0.014 % wt10/31/2014

161416735-0004 0.01410/28/20147760.7-578-04Pb % wt

Site: Exterior - Beige On Drivit Wall <0.010 % wt10/31/2014

161416735-0005 0.01010/28/20147760.7-578-05Pb % wt

Page 1 of 1Test Report PB w/RDL-7.32.3 Printed: 11/6/2014 8:22:34 AM

Doug Wiegand, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements established by the AIHA-LAP, unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Indianapolis, IN AIHA-LAP, LLC--ELLAP 157245, OH E10040

Initial report from 11/06/2014 08:22:34 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:indianapolislab@emsl.com

OrderID: 161416735

Appendix G EMSL Laboratories, Inc. Certification

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC acknowledges that

EMSL Analytical, Inc 2235 Polvorosa Ave., Suite 230, San Leandro, CA 94577

Laboratory ID: 101748 along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirements of the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs (AIHA-LAP), LLC accreditation to the ISO/IEC 17025:2005 international standard, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories in the following:

LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Accreditation Expires:

ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD Accreditation Expires:

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Accreditation Expires: 11/01/2015 FOOD Accreditation Expires:

UNIQUE SCOPES Accreditation Expires:

Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/Method(s) within each Accreditation Program for which the above named laboratory maintains accreditation is outlined on the attached Scope of Accreditation. Continued accreditation is contingent upon successful on-going compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and AIHA-LAP, LLC requirements. This certificate is not valid without the attached Scope of Accreditation. Please review the AIHA- LAP, LLC website (www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org) for the most current Scope.

Larry S. Pierce Chairperson, Analytical Accreditation Board

Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC

Revision 13: 03/12/2013 Date Issued: 09/30/2013 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org/

Effective: 03/12/2013 101748_Scope_EMLAP_2013_09_30

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION

EMSL Analytical, Inc Laboratory ID: 101748 2235 Polvorosa Ave., Suite 230, San Leandro, CA 94577 Issue Date: 09/30/2013

The laboratory is approved for those specific field(s) of testing/methods listed in the table below. Clients are urged to verify the laboratory’s current accreditation status for the particular field(s) of testing/Methods, since these can change due to proficiency status, suspension and/or withdrawal of accreditation.

Environmental Microbiology Laboratory Accreditation Program (EMLAP)

Initial Accreditation Date: 04/01/2005

EMLAP Category Field of Testing (FoT) Method Method Description

(for internal methods only)

Fungal

Air - Direct Examination SOP 05-TP-003.5

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Airborne Fungal Spores, Hyphal Fragments, Pollen, Insect Fragments, Skin Fragments and Fibrous

Particulate by Optical Microscopy of Spore Trap Samples

Bulk - Direct Examination SOP M041

Standard Operating Procedure for the Microscopic Examination of Fungal

Spores, Fungal Structures, Hyphae, Pollen, Insect Fragments and Fibrous Material

From Surface Samples

Surface - Direct Examination SOP M041

Standard Operating Procedure for the Microscopic Examination of Fungal

Spores, Fungal Structures, Hyphae, Pollen, Insect Fragments and Fibrous Material

From Surface Samples

A complete listing of currently accredited Environmental Microbiology laboratories is available on the AIHA-LAP, LLC website at: http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org/

Appendix H Sample Locations Drawings

E D

-T O

X