B.08.02 Amended Park Attendant Services Soliciation 24Q0025.pdf

PDF 387 KB Posted

Attached to
Park Attendant Services at Jennings Randolph Lake Park
Solicitation number
W912DR24Q0025
Issued by

About this file

This document is an amendment to a solicitation (Request for Quotation) for Park Attendant Services at Jennings Randolph Lake Park in West Virginia. The amendment updates the evaluation criteria, extends the closing date from April 16, 2024 to April 23, 2024, and provides details on the evaluation process.

The solicitation is a 100% small business set-aside, with a NAICS code of 721211 and a size standard of $10,000,000. The contract will be a firm-fixed-price award based on the lowest-priced, technically acceptable offer. The evaluation factors are Technical, Past Performance, and Price, with Past Performance being the most important factor. Offerors must provide three references for similar, recent projects performed within the last five years. Pricing must be provided for all line items, and the government may request additional pricing information to determine fair and reasonable pricing. The contract period of performance is from date of award to April 31, 2025.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to update the evaluation criteria for this solicitation and to update the closing date from Tuesday April 16, 2024 at 2:00 PM to Tuesday April 23, 2024 at 2:00 PM. All other terms and requirment remains unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 18-Apr-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912DR24Q0025

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Mar-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-Apr-2024

CODE

USACE, BALTIMORE

2 HOPKINS PLAZA

BALTIMORE MD 21201

W912DR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DR24Q0025

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

The Government will award a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the requirements as stated in this request for quotation (RFQ). The award will be made based on the following three (3) evaluation factors: Technical, Past Performance, and Price.

The Government intends to evaluate quotes and make award without questions to offerors. Therefore, the Offeror's initial quote should contain the Offeror's best terms from a Technical and Cost standpoint. Unclear quotes may not result in questions for clarifications. Offers with an omission or unclear quote may be judged to mean the contractor does not fully understand the requirements or understand what it takes to meet the requirements, regardless ofthe proposed cost/price, and will be rated unacceptable. In that case, the Offeror may be found unacceptable, and ineligible for award. The Government reserves the right to ask questions ofofferors ifthe

Contracting Officer determines them to be necessary.

1. PAST PERFORMANCE

Past performance refers to the quality ofrecent project experience from the customer's perspective. The Offeror shall arrange for the reference customer point ofcontact for three projects to fill out the Past Performance Questionnaire and return directly to Nastashia Willoughby , Contract Specialist, e-mail at Nastashia.d.willoughby@usace.army.mil

The questionnaires must be forwarded directly by the references. Ensure that the reference is clearly marked for the applicable Offeror when submitted. The Government will not release the questionnaire forms to the Offeror at any time, for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased responses and comments.

The Offeror shall provide three (3) references for previously completed jobs. References shall include a point of contact and contact information. These references must be relevant to the work which will be performed in this contract and recent (within the past five (5) years). of work self-performed (subcontracting out all work is an examples of less relevant experience).

In addition, The Offeror shall demonstrate recent, relevant experience on similar projects as specified in the performance work statement. If the Offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall demonstrate experience on similar projects.

1.A. Past Performance Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate how well the Offeror demonstrated their recent (within three years of the issue date of the RFQ), relevant experience with similar projects. Similar projects are projects that include previous park attendant services at local, state, or federal parks. If the Offeror is

W912DR24Q0025

a joint venture, each entity must demonstrate qualifying experience comparable to its role on the project. The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects or to interview owners or references. The Government reserves the right to check any or all cited references to verify supplied information. A rating of Unacceptable will be given to an Offeror who cannot demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relevance of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with similar sites and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to: (1) Number, size, type work, location; (2) Dates (completion within last 10 years); and (3) Firm's role and extent of work self-performed (subcontracting out all work is an examples ofless relevant experience).

Past Performance Rating Definition

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING DEFINITION

ACCEPTABLE Past performance references and /or PPQ has satisfactory ratings and clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

UNNACEPTABLE ast performance references and/ or PPQ has nsatisfactory ratings and clearly does not meet the inimum requirements of the solicitation.

NEUTRAL No past performance submitted.

2. PRICE

Quote Sheet must be filled out completely. Government template provided. All line items must be priced. Quotes providing partial pricing shall be considered non-responsive.

Pricing will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.402. The government may require additional pricing information to assist in determining the extent to which the price is fair, and reasonableness and the pricing information shall be provide if requested. The Government will evaluate quotes for award purposes by adding the total of all CUN prices to ensure that pricing is not unbalanced. Offeror must complete all line items to be considered for award. This submission item is not rated. Award will be made for the lowest-price, technically acceptable offer.

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .