A.02.01_Solicitation-Amendment-18-Q-0040-0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to include a revised Statement of Work, revised Instruction to Offerors and to extend the solicitation response date from April 30, 2018, 11:00 AM EST to May 31, 2018, 11:00 AM EST. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 19

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-May-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DR18Q0040

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

28-Mar-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-May-2018

CODE

USACE, BALTIMORE DISTRICT

2 HOPKINS PLAZA

ROOM 03-G-01

BALTIMORE MD 21201

W912DR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DR18Q0040

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

2ND REVISED STATEMENT OF WORK

REVISED STATEMENT OF WORK

05/14/2018

Investigate Exterior Leaks Entire DLA HQs Bldg.

Fort Belvoir, VA

1. BACKGROUND

The DLA Headquarters building (Bldg.2462, HQC) located at 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Ft. Belvoir, VA., 22060 has a requirement to find all leaks on the exterior of the McNamara Building, Pods 1-10. For the past year and longer the tenants within the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Headquarters Center (HQC) have been dealing with water leaking into the interior of the premises. The leaks may be on the newly, installed roof or within the exterior wall and its many joints. The leaks only occur after a rain event and could possibly come from multiple locations such as the Roof, Exterior Walls, Roof Penetrations, Skylights, Parapets, Elevator Rooms, and other locations. A roof replacement project was completed on

7 SEP 2016.

2. FIELD INVESTIGATION SCOPE/FEATURE/ELEMENTS/SERVICES

In general terms, the project consists of providing field investigation services to determine leak sources and recommended repairs to Bldg. 2462, Fort Belvoir, VA.

a. Certification—Firm must be certified with a torch applied, two-ply SBS modified Bitumen Membrane in case investigative demolition is performed to track down a leak. The contractor making the repair or alterations on or adjacent to the Siplast product needs to be a Siplast certified installer to maintain warranty. Siplast certification is required.

1- SUPPLY VERIFICATION OF A CURRENT, TORCH-APPLIED, TWO-PLY SBS MODIFIED

BITUMEN MEMBRANE CERTIFICATION. IF YOU ARE PLANNING TO USE A

SUBCONTRACTOR TO MEET THIS LEVEL, SUPPLY THEIR VERIFICATION AND A TEAMING

AGREEMENT.

2- SUPPLY VERIFICATION OF A CURRENT, SIPLAST CERTIFICATION. IF YOU ARE

PLANNING TO USE A SUBCONTRACTOR TO MEET THIS LEVEL, SUPPLY THEIR

VERIFICATION AND A TEAMING AGREEMENT.

b. Conduct a Field Investigation—Assemble and review existing information. Research existing record documents for familiarization with the building layout and its systems. Field investigation Services to include:

i. Base Bid: Field Investigation—Ninety-one (91) calendar days visual inspection by the team including water testing of suspected areas of leaks. Schedule within 7 Calendar days after date of notice to proceed the on-site field investigation.

1. Specific Building Areas and Systems to be Investigated—Investigation of the leak locations shall include but not be limited to:

a. Flat Roof Area (approx.160,253 sq. ft.)

b. Skylights

c. Parapets and cast stone coping

d. Scuppers

e. Elevator rooms

f. Vertical surfaces on the roof

g. Pipe and any other penetrations

h. Expansion joints on the roof

i. Pre-cast panel sealant joints

j. Damaged pre-cast panels (cracks)

k. Hardscape to metal sealant joints

l. Masonry sealant joints

m. Deteriorated duct sealant joints

n. Open duct wrap

o. Open conditions/missing fasteners at duct work

p. Open Penetration flashing above the new roof flashing

q. Non-sealed wall penetrations

r. Deteriorated EIFS finish

s. Open flexible duct connectors

t. Skylight fans

u. Skylight glass gaskets/glazing

v. Rust development to metal duct pans

w. Penthouse roofs and their penetrations

x. Junction wall between Pod 9 and Pod 10

y. Exterior brick wall and its mortar joints

z. Expansion joints in the brick wall

aa. Control joints

bb. Weep holes

cc. Window connections to the brick wall

dd. Connections of dissimilar materials

ee. Roof and curbing over angled windows within exterior wall

ff. Exterior sealant joints within curtain walls, aluminum panels and glazing

gg. Exterior sealant joints between curtain walls and precast coping stone and brick face

hh. Exterior sealant joints between brick wall and precast coping stone (outside face of building)

ii. Interface of masonry membrane flashing at brick, soldiers row and curtain wall

jj. Interface between "saw-tooth" curtain wall, expansion joint and flashing outside of parapet wall.

kk. Exterior sealant joints at elevator machine room precast

ll. Hairline cracks and/or porous surfaces at elevator machine room precast

mm. All other related components necessary to bring a stop to leaks experience in the

HQC including the basement, sub-basement and foundation.

nn. Water test all suspected leaks. Any leaks found shall be documented

oo. If something is observed with the recent repairs whether on the roof or the walls that appears to be incorrect in its application but is not necessarily causing a leak, the application shall be noted for later correction.

pp. Window cleaner equipment whether it is a motorized platform or a boatswain’s seat can be an option to be used on this job to inspect on the exterior brick and glass wall as there are davits/roof anchors available around the perimeter of the roof.

2. Report Review—Submit report after ninety-one (91) calendar days of field investigation.

There will be fourteen (14) calendar days for the Government to review the written report and make comments. Submit the final Field Investigation Report within fourteen (14) calendar days after the Government Review.

ii. Option 1: Sixty (60) calendar days to take place within the ninety-one (91) calendar days for the Base Bid. Option may be awarded within 31 calendar days of award of base bid contract.

Provide one Nuclear Roof Moisture survey or similar survey. Convert data produced by the nuclear gauge into a map of identified moisture penetration inside the roof system. Identify locations of potential roof and exterior wall leakage. A vector mapping survey was performed and completed under the original re-roofing project.

1. Specific Building Areas and Systems to be Investigated—Investigation of the leak locations shall include but not be limited to:

a. Flat Roof Area (approx.160,253 sq. ft.)

3. SUBMIT REPORTS – a Final Report submission (for Government Review and Comment) is required. The report is to include but not be limited to:

a. Findings of the field investigation with a building locator plan and pictures indicating sources of leaks.

b. Recommended solutions for corrective repairs to eliminate leaks including preliminary quantity take offs for solutions but no estimates of probably costs. Solutions are to be listed in order of suggested repair priority in order of most-to-least impact.

c. Government Review (Dr. Checks) – upon submission of the Final Report, a 14-calendar day Government Review and Comment posting in Dr. Checks will commence. The Contractor will evaluate and post in Dr. Checks responses to each review comment. The Contractor will participate in a comment / evaluation resolution meeting for path forward agreement of report clarifications and corrections to be made for the final report submission

d. Information in the report will be used by the Government to prepare the scope of work for the follow on Design/Build Contract.

4. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

a. Pictures: All photos must be taken with a designated Government escort. All photos must be reviewed by designated Government security representative. Follow Customer policies and complete in advance authorization form for taking pictures. Approval process may take up to one week.

b. Facility Security Clearance. The Prime Contractor must possess an active Facility Security

Clearance (FCL) at the Secret level.

c. Building Security. The Prime Contractor shall be responsible for safeguarding all Government property provided for Contractor use. At the close of each work period, Government facilities, equipment and materials shall be secured Contractor personnel that require access to POD 10 infrastructure shall possess at a minimum a SECRET level as verified through the Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS). Prior to commencement of work, the Prime Contractor shall provide Visit Authorization Requests in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Manual (DOD 5220.22-M) and any instructions contained in the DD Form 254 (Contract Security Classification Specification), on all personnel that will be required to have access to DTRA infrastructure.

d. Entrance into the facility is Access Controlled and all persons and vehicles are subject to search.

All Contractor or sub-Contractor personnel shall be required to sign-in upon entry into the building unless a badge has been issued to the Contractor personnel. All Contractor personnel who work in the HQC shall be required to fill out the necessary information to obtain a badge.

All Contractor employees must receive a favorable background investigation. If the background investigations are unfavorable, HQC Command Security will make the determination to allow access to the HQC. The cost of the background investigation shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. Once the Contractor’s personnel have passed the background investigation, the Security Divisions will issue appropriate badges.

e. SUPPLY VERIFICATION OF AN ACTIVE FACILITY SECURITY CLEARANCE (FCL) AT THE

SECRET LEVEL. IF YOU ARE PLANNING TO USE A SUBCONTRACTOR TO MEET THIS

LEVEL, SUPPLY THEIR VERIFICATION AND A TEAMING AGREEMENT.

f. FOR POD 10, SUPPLY VERIFICATION OF AN ACTIVE JOINT PERSONNEL ADJUDICATION

SYSTEM (JPAS) CLEARANCE AT THE MINIMUM OF A SECRET LEVEL. IF YOU ARE

PLANNING TO USE A SUBCONTRACTOR TO MEET THIS LEVEL, SUPPLY THEIR

VERIFICATION AND A TEAMING AGREEMENT.

5. OPSEC

a. AT Level I Training. "All contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access to Army installations, facilities, controlled access areas, or require network access, shall complete AT Level I awareness training within 30 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable. Upon request, the contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if a COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel. AT Level I awareness training is available at the following website:

http://jko.jten.mil/courses/atl1/launch.html ; or it can be provided by the RA ATO in presentation form which will be documented via memorandum."

b. Access and General Protection/Security Policy and Procedures. Per Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12), Common Access Cards (CAC) are required for contractors working six months or more; background investigations are required prior to CAC credential issuance. Uncleared contractors working less than six months must submit to a background check, via the appropriate Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services or Security Office, and must abide by applicable identification and access control requirements. Proposed language: "All contractor and all associated sub-contractors employees shall comply with applicable installation, facility and area commander installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures (provided by government representative). The contractor shall also provide all information required for background checks or background investigation and to meet installation/facility access requirements to be accomplished by installation Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services or Security Office. Contractor workforce must comply with all personal identity verification requirements as directed by DOD, HQDA and/or local policy. In addition to the changes otherwise authorized by the changes clause of this contract, should the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) at any installation or facility change, the Government may require changes in contractor security matters or processes."

c. Suspicious Activity Reporting Training (e.g. iWATCH, CorpsWatch, or See Something, Say

Something). "The contractor and all associated sub-contractors shall receive a brief/training (provided by the RA) on the local suspicious activity reporting program. This locally developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the project manager, security representative or law enforcement entity. This training shall be completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 5 calendar days after the completion of the training."

d. For Contracts that Require OPSEC Training. Per AR 530-1, (Operations Security) contractor employees must complete Level I OPSEC Training within 30 calendar days of contract award.

"All new contractor employees will complete Level I OPSEC Training within 30 calendar days of their reporting for duty. Additionally, all contractor employees must complete annual OPSEC awareness training. The contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if a COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training. OPSEC awareness training is available at the following websites: https://www.iad.gov/ioss/ or http://www.cdse.edu/catalog/operations-security.html ; or it can be provided by the RA OPSEC Officer in presentation form which will be documented via memorandum."

e. For Contracts That Require Handling or Access to Classified Information. This clause involves access to classified information, i.e. “Confidential,” “Secret,” or “Top Secret”.

"Contractor shall comply with AR 380-67 (Personnel Security Program) and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors) as well as FAR 52.204-2, Security Requirements. Additionally, Contractors must comply with - (1) The Security Agreement (DD Form 441), including the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DoD 5220.22-M); any revisions to DOD 5220.22-M, notice of which has been furnished to the contractor. For classified contracts, the DD Form 254 will be attached with the contract."

f. Will be escorted in areas where they may be exposed to classified and/or sensitive materials and/or sensitive or restricted areas. The contractor will coordinate with the COR and/or the facility security office for access when required. (Use when security clearances are not required, i.e. facility repair or construction). "All contract employees, including subcontractor employees who are not in possession of the appropriate security clearance or access privileges, will be escorted in areas where they may be exposed to classified and/or sensitive materials and/or sensitive or restricted areas."

g. Contractor Company to obtain a Facility Clearance and individual clearances at the appropriate level. "The Prime Contractor Company must have a Facility Clearance (FCL) at the appropriate level (IAW the NISPOM DOD 5220.22-M and AR 380-49) prior to the start of the contract awarded period of performance. Contractor personnel performing work under this contract must have the required security clearance, per AR 380-67, at the appropriate level at the start of the period of performance. Security Clearances and FCL requirements are required to be maintained for the life of the contract IAW the DD Form 254 attached to the contract. If no FCL, the supporting Government Contracting Activity will sponsor the prime contract company in obtaining the FCL."

6. SUBMITTALS

a. The Contractor will provide the Project Manager (6) Copies and (2) CD’s (with electronic PDF report file) for the Final Report Submission for PM Distribution to Government stakeholders.

b. OPTION (if option is exercised): Written results from one (1) follow-on day of use of leak detection technology / equipment to pin point, as exact as possible, the locations of concealed leaks as deemed necessary by the investigation team.

7. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED DATA

a. ATTACHMENT 1: RECENT LIST OF LEAKS FROM DLA—17 OCT 17

b. ATTACHMENT 2: ROOF PHOTOS

c. ATTACHMENT 3: INTERIOR PHOTOS OF LEAK LOCATIONS

8. POINTS OF CONTACT:

Baltimore District Project Manager (PM): O. M. “Chuck” Spangler, Jr. RA Phone: (703) 806-3208

Stakeholder Point-of-Contact: Tamberly Averett Phone: (703) 625-9653

9. SUBMISSION OF INVOICE

Original invoices for services performed under the contract will be submitted to and payment will be made by:

USPS:

ATTN: O. M. SPANGLER, JR.

CAPITAL AREA OFFICE, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

P. O. BOX 89

FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060

HAND-DELIVERED, FED EX, UPS, ETC:

ATTN: O. M. SPANGLER, JR.

CAPITAL AREA OFFICE, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

6050 1ST STREET

FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Revised Instruction to Offerors 05/14/2018

Offers shall be prepared in accordance with these instructions, providing all required information in the specified format. Official submission will be documented in accordance with the date and time stamp of the email submission.

Proposals shall be submitted via email ONLY to Mr. Gentian Mulla at Gentian.Mulla@usace.army.mil no later than due date listed in Box (8) of Solicitation. 31 May, 2018 at 11:00 AM EST.

The Government will honor Requests for Information (RFI) regarding this procurement. Should the Offeror choose to submit questions, they must be submitted by email to Gentian Mulla at Gentian.Mulla@usace.army.mil no later than 11:00AM EST on 17 April, 2018 23 May, 2018. This will allow responses to be posted on FBO prior to solicitation closing. Questions may not be accepted after the cutoff date/time above.

Site Visit - Offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost or contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after contract award.

Site location is: DLA Headquarters building (Bldg.2462, HQC) located at 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Ft. Belvoir, VA., 22060.

The scheduled site visit will be performed on 12 April, 2018 21 May, 2018.

To attend, please arrange for 9:30 am start time and arrive 15 minutes early.

This Project is located within a secure area of the Post. To arrange for a site visit, Contractors are limited to 2 (two) participants and are required to submit electronically, no later than two business days prior to the scheduled site visit, to: otto.m.spangler@usace.army.mil. Please include the date of the visit and company name on each request.

1. Full Name

2. Date of Birth

3. Social Security Number

4. Gender

Please bring acceptable government-issued photo ID, vehicle registration, documentation of vehicle insurance coverage, and a copy of a solicitation for verification purposes to the site visit.

Directions: Please see attached directions and map.

Submissions Criteria Requirements - The offer will be evaluated to ensure all the items below are provided:

Cover Letter on Offeror’s letterhead. Letter shall summarize the pricing total and include Offeror specific details such as Cage Code, Tax ID#, and DUNS #. Letter shall be signed by the representative managing the account.

Capability Statement. The proposed capabilities should include adequate documentation to illustrate the Offeror’s capabilities to successfully complete the work identified within the solicitation.

Two (2) Past Performance references for similar projects. Projects must have been completed within the previous five (5) years.

Two (2) Past Performance Questionnaires below.

Bid Schedule – Government template provided.

Verification for the following certifications:

1- Torch applied, two-ply SBS modified Bitumen Membrane 2- Siplast 3- Security Please see Revised Statement of Work for more details.

Directions to Defense Logistics Agency at Fort Belvoir

Headquarters Building 2462

From Interstate 95:

1. Take exit 166A towards Newington/Ft. Belvoir

2. Merge onto VA-286 W/Fairfax County Pkwy

3. Travel 2.1 miles

4. Turn left onto John J. Kingman Road

5. Enter the second gate on the right.

6. After entering the second gate on the right, continue to first left turn.

7. You may park in gravel parking lot/former softball field

8. If gravel lot becomes full, you may park in the paved spaces.

9. After parking, continue by foot to front lobby of DLA HQC.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offer whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Offer shall submit technical proposals addressing the Evaluation Factors 1, 2, and 3 identified in paragraph below.

Offers will be evaluated for acceptability, but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors.

This procurement is being conducted utilizing a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process in accordance with FAR 15.101-2. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. There shall be no trade-offs.

Responsibility determination will be made in accordance with FAR 9.1. Note that offers that are not Technically Acceptable cannot be selected for award, regardless of Price. When combined Technical and Past Performance factors are approximately equal to cost or price. Therefore, the initial quote should contain the contractor's best terms from a Technical and Cost standpoint.

Evaluation Factors for Award:

Factor 1 – Technical Acceptability of the item offered to meet the Government requirements

Factor 2 – Past Performance

Factor 3 – Cost/Price

Factors 1 and 2 will be evaluated as “Acceptable or Unacceptable.” The Government intends to make a single award to the lowest price technically acceptable offer. To receive an overall acceptable rating and be eligible for award, the offer must be technically acceptable for Factors 1, 2, and 3.

Factor 1 – Technical Acceptability: To be technically acceptable, the Offer must provide information as specified in the attached Scope of Work. Each submittal will be evaluated to ensure requirements are met. The responsiveness and quality of information delivered by the Technical Service Department contacts provided shall also be considered in evaluating technical acceptability.

Technical Rating Table A-1. Technical Acceptability

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the RFQ (Request for Quotation) Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the RFQ

Factor 2 – Past Performance: An acceptable rating is required to be considered for award.

The Offer must provide information demonstrating that they have already successfully performed as a prime contractor within the last five (5) years and (2) contracts of equal or greater complexity to this solicitation in the minimum price range. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

If applicable, include performance recognition documents received within the last (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluation past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offers proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (ESRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offer.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offer.

Past Performance Rating

Table A-2. Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the Offers performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offer will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offers performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the Offers performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offer will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral No past performance submitted.*

*Note: In the case of an Offer without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offer may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offer shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “neutral”.

Factor 3 – Price: Offers shall insert proposed pricing in the Price Schedule, proposing a price on all proposed line items. The Government will evaluate quotes for award purposes by adding the total CLINs prices to ensure that pricing is not unbalanced. Offer must complete all line items in the price schedule to be considered for award. All line items must be priced. Quotes providing partial pricing shall be considered non-responsive.

Please complete the Questionnaire below:

USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the customer’s perspective.

The Offeror shall arrange for the reference customer point of contact for two projects to fill out the Questionnaire and return directly to Gentian Mulla, Purchasing Agent, e-mail at Gentian.Mulla@usace.army.mil. The questionnaires must be forwarded directly by the references. The Government will not release the questionnaire forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased responses and comments. Two (2) References from previously completed jobs must be submitted and include a point of contact and phone numbers. These references must be relevant to the work which will be performed in this contract and listed in the Statement Of work.

References must be recent within the past five (5) years.

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST

REFLECTS

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced E VG S M U N cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E E

VG

VG

S S

M M

U U

N N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

(End of Summary of Changes)