A.02.01_Solicitation-18-Q-0040.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

W912DR18Q0040 28-Mar-2018

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

410-962-2107

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

11:00 AM 30 Apr 2018

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA X ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

W912DR9. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

GENTIAN MULLA

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.X

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X

SMALL BUSINESSX

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

USACE, BALTIMORE DISTRICT

2 HOPKINS PLAZA

ROOM 03-G-01

BALTIMORE MD 21201

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BY

SEE SCHEDULE

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

FAX:

TEL: 410-962-2196 SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$15,000,000

NAICS:

238160

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF92

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

Section SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Offers shall be prepared in accordance with these instructions, providing all required information in the specified format. Official submission will be documented in accordance with the date and time stamp of the email submission.

Proposals shall be submitted via email ONLY to Mr. Gentian Mulla at Gentian.Mulla@usace.army.mil no later than due date listed in Box (8) of Solicitation.

The Government will honor Requests for Information (RFI) regarding this procurement. Should the Offeror choose to submit questions, they must be submitted by email to Gentian Mulla at Gentian.Mulla@usace.army.mil no later than 11:00AM EST on 17 April, 2018. This will allow responses to be posted on FBO prior to solicitation closing. Questions may not be accepted after the cutoff date/time above.

Site Visit - Offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost or contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after contract award.

Site location is: DLA Headquarters building (Bldg.2462, HQC) located at 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Ft. Belvoir, VA., 22060.

The scheduled site visit will be performed on 12 April, 2018.

To attend, please arrange for 9:30 am start time and arrive 15 minutes early.

This Project is located within a secure area of the Post. To arrange for a site visit, Contractors are limited to 2 (two) participants and are required to submit electronically, no later than two business days prior to the scheduled site visit, to: otto.m.spangler@usace.army.mil. Please include the date of the visit and company name on each request.

1. Full Name

2. Date of Birth

3. Social Security Number

4. Gender

Please bring acceptable government-issued photo ID, vehicle registration, documentation of vehicle insurance coverage, and a copy of a solicitation for verification purposes to the site visit.

Directions: Please see attached directions and map.

Submissions Criteria - The offer will be evaluated to ensure all the items below are provided:

Cover Letter on Offeror’s letterhead. Letter shall summarize the pricing total and include Offeror specific details such as Cage Code, Tax ID#, and DUNS #. Letter shall be signed by the representative managing the account.

Capability Statement. The proposed capabilities should include adequate documentation to illustrate the Offeror’s capabilities to successfully complete the work identified within the solicitation.

Two (2) Past Performance references for similar projects. Projects must have been completed within the previous five (5) years.

Two (2) Past Performance Questionnaires below.

Bid Schedule – Government template provided.

Directions to Defense Logistics Agency at Fort Belvoir Headquarters Building 2462

From Interstate 95:

1. Take exit 166A towards Newington/Ft. Belvoir

2. Merge onto VA-286 W/Fairfax County Pkwy

3. Travel 2.1 miles

4. Turn left onto John J. Kingman Road

5. Enter the second gate on the right.

6. After entering the second gate on the right, continue to first left turn.

7. You may park in gravel parking lot/former softball field

8. If gravel lot becomes full, you may park in the paved spaces.

9. After parking, continue by foot to front lobby of DLA HQC.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offer whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Offer shall submit technical proposals addressing the Evaluation Factors 1, 2, and 3 identified in paragraph below.

Offers will be evaluated for acceptability, but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors.

This procurement is being conducted utilizing a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process in accordance with FAR 15.101-2. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. There shall be no trade-offs.

Responsibility determination will be made in accordance with FAR 9.1. Note that offers that are not Technically Acceptable cannot be selected for award, regardless of Price.

Evaluation Factors for Award:

Factor 1 – Technical Acceptability of the item offered to meet the Government requirements

Factor 2 – Past Performance

Factor 3 – Cost/Price

Factors 1 and 2 will be evaluated as “Acceptable or Unacceptable.” The Government intends to make a single award to the lowest price technically acceptable offer. To receive an overall acceptable rating and be eligible for award, the offer must be technically acceptable for Factors 1, 2, and 3.

Factor 1 – Technical Acceptability: To be technically acceptable, the Offer must provide information as specified in the attached Scope of Work. Each submittal will be evaluated to ensure requirements are met. The responsiveness and quality of information delivered by the Technical Service Department contacts provided shall also be considered in evaluating technical acceptability.

Technical Rating Table A-1. Technical Acceptability

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the RFQ (Request for Quotation) Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the RFQ

Factor 2 – Past Performance: An acceptable rating is required to be considered for award.

The Offer must provide information demonstrating that they have already successfully performed as a prime contractor within the last five (5) years and (2) contracts of equal or greater complexity to this solicitation in the minimum price range. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

If applicable, include performance recognition documents received within the last (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluation past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System

(CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offers proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (ESRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offer.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offer.

Past Performance Rating

Table A-2. Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the Offers performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offer will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offers performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the Offers performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offer will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral No past performance submitted.*

*Note: In the case of an Offer without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offer may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offer shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “neutral”.

Factor 3 – Price: Offers shall insert proposed pricing in the Price Schedule, proposing a price on all proposed line items. The Government will evaluate quotes for award purposes by adding the total CLINs prices to ensure that pricing is not unbalanced. Offer must complete all line items in the price schedule to be considered for award. All line items must be priced. Quotes providing partial pricing shall be considered non-responsive.

Please complete the Questionnaire below:

USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the customer’s perspective.

The Offeror shall arrange for the reference customer point of contact for two projects to fill out the Questionnaire and return directly to Gentian Mulla, Purchasing Agent, e-mail at Gentian.Mulla@usace.army.mil. The questionnaires must be forwarded directly by the references. The Government will not release the questionnaire forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased responses and comments. Two (2) References from previously completed jobs must be submitted and include a point of contact and phone numbers. These references must be relevant to the work which will be performed in this contract and listed in the Statement Of work.

References must be recent within the past five (5) years.

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH

BEST REFLECTS

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced E VG S M U N cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E E

VG

VG

S S

M M

U U

N N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

PRICE SCHEDULE

PRICE SCHEDULE

DLA HQs Bldg. Fort Belvoir, VA

ITEM

NO.

DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT

BASIC ITEMS

0001 All work complete for the study of the DLA HQs to find all leaks on the exterior of the McNamara Building, Pods 1- 10 and submit the final Field Investigation Report. It is possible the leaks may be structural including leaks in the foundation. The leaks may be on the newly, installed roof or within the exterior wall and its many joints.

Job

TOTAL BASIC AMOUNT

(ITEMS 0001)

OPTION ITEMS

0002 All work complete for the uses of a nuclear roof moisture survey

Job

TOTAL AMOUNT (CLIN 0001 Plus CLIN 0002) $

Note: OFFEROR SHALL PROVIDE A QUOTE FOR EACH LINE ITEM ON THE “PRICE

SCHEDULE”. FAILURE TO ABIDE MAY RESULT IN QUOTE BEING CONSIDERED NON-

RESPONSIVE AND INELIGBLE FOR AWARD

STATEMENT OF WORK

STATEMENT OF WORK

Investigate Exterior Leaks Entire

DLA HQs Bldg.

Fort Belvoir, VA

1) BACKGROUND

The DLA Headquarters building (Bldg.2462, HQC) located at 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Ft. Belvoir, VA., 22060 has a requirement to find all leaks on the exterior of the McNamara Building, Pods 1-10. For the past year and longer the tenants within the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Headquarters Center (HQC) have been dealing with water leaking into the interior of the premises. The leaks may be on the newly, installed roof or within the exterior wall and its many joints. The leaks only occur after a rain event and could possibly come from multiple locations such as the Roof, Exterior Walls, Roof Penetrations, Skylights, Parapets, Elevator Rooms, and other locations. A roof replacement project was completed on

7 SEP 2016.

2) FIELD INVESTIGATION SCOPE/FEATURE/ELEMENTS/SERVICES

In general terms, the project consists of providing field investigation services to determine leak sources and recommended repairs to Bldg. 2462, Fort Belvoir, VA.

a) Certification—Firm must be certified with a torch applied, two-ply SBS modified Bitumen Membrane. Siplast certification is preferred but not required.

b) Conduct a Field Investigation—Assemble and review existing information. Research existing record documents for familiarization with the building layout and its systems. Field investigation Services to include:

i) Base Bid: Field Investigation—Ninety-one (91) calendar days visual inspection by the team including water testing of suspected areas of leaks. Schedule within 7 Calendar days after date of notice to proceed the on-site field investigation.

(1) Specific Building Areas and Systems to be Investigated—Investigation of the leak locations shall include but not be limited to:

(a) Flat Roof Area (approx.160,253 sq. ft.)

(b) Skylights

(c) Parapets and cast stone coping

(d) Scuppers

(e) Elevator rooms

(f) Vertical surfaces on the roof

(g) Pipe and any other penetrations

(h) Expansion joints on the roof

(i) Pre-cast panel sealant joints

(j) Damaged pre-cast panels (cracks)

(k) Hardscape to metal sealant joints

(l) Masonry sealant joints

(m) Deteriorated duct sealant joints

(n) Open duct wrap

(o) Open conditions/missing fasteners at duct work

(p) Open Penetration flashing above the new roof flashing

(q) Non-sealed wall penetrations

(r) Deteriorated EIFS finish

(s) Open flexible duct connectors

(t) Skylight fans

(u) Skylight glass gaskets/glazing

(v) Rust development to metal duct pans

(w) Penthouse roofs and their penetrations

(x) Junction wall between Pod 9 and Pod 10

(y) Exterior brick wall and its mortar joints

(z) Expansion joints in the brick wall

(aa) Control joints

(bb) Weep holes

(cc) Window connections to the brick wall

(dd) Connections of dissimilar materials

(ee) Roof and curbing over angled windows within exterior wall

(ff) Exterior sealant joints within curtain walls, aluminum panels and glazing

(gg) Exterior sealant joints between curtain walls and precast coping stone and brick face

(hh) Exterior sealant joints between brick wall and precast coping stone (outside face of building)

(ii) Interface of masonry membrane flashing at brick, soldiers row and curtain wall

(jj) Interface between "saw-tooth" curtain wall, expansion joint and flashing outside of parapet wall.

(kk) Exterior sealant joints at elevator machine room precast

(ll) Hairline cracks and/or porous surfaces at elevator machine room precast

(mm) All other related components necessary to bring a stop to leaks experience in the

HQC including the basement, sub-basement and foundation.

(nn) Water test all suspected leaks. Any leaks found shall be documented

(oo) If something is observed with the recent repairs whether on the roof or the walls that appears to be incorrect in its application but is not necessarily causing a leak, the application shall be noted for later correction.

(pp) Window cleaner equipment whether it is a motorized platform or a boatswain’s seat can be an option to be used on this job to inspect on the exterior brick and glass wall as there are davits/roof anchors available around the perimeter of the roof.

(2) Report Review—Submit report after ninety-one (91) calendar days of field investigation.

There will be fourteen (14) calendar days for the Government to review the written report and make comments. Submit the final Field Investigation Report within fourteen (14) calendar days after the Government Review.

ii) Option 1: Sixty (60) calendar days to take place within the ninety-one (91) calendar days for the Base Bid. Option may be awarded within 31 calendar days of award of base bid contract.

Provide one Nuclear Roof Moisture survey or similar survey. Convert data produced by the nuclear gauge into a map of identified moisture penetration inside the roof system. Identify locations of potential roof and exterior wall leakage. A vector mapping survey was performed and completed under the original re-roofing project.

(1) Specific Building Areas and Systems to be Investigated—Investigation of the leak locations shall include but not be limited to:

(a) Flat Roof Area (approx.160,253 sq. ft.)

3) SUBMIT REPORTS – a Final Report submission (for Government Review and Comment) is required. The report is to include but not be limited to:

a) Findings of the field investigation with a building locator plan and pictures indicating sources of leaks.

b) Recommended solutions for corrective repairs to eliminate leaks including preliminary quantity take offs for solutions but no estimates of probably costs. Solutions are to be listed in order of suggested repair priority in order of most-to-least impact.

c) Government Review (Dr. Checks) – upon submission of the Final Report, a 14-calendar day Government Review and Comment posting in Dr. Checks will commence. The Contractor will evaluate and post in Dr. Checks responses to each review comment. The Contractor will participate in a comment / evaluation resolution meeting for path forward agreement of report clarifications and corrections to be made for the final report submission

d) Information in the report will be used by the Government to prepare the scope of work for the follow on Design/Build Contract.

4) SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

a) Pictures: All photos must be taken with a designated Government escort. All photos must be reviewed by designated Government security representative. Follow Customer policies and complete in advance authorization form for taking pictures. Approval process may take up to one week.

b) Facility Security Clearance. The Prime Contractor must possess an active Facility Security

Clearance (FCL) at the Secret level.

c) Building Security. The Prime Contractor shall be responsible for safeguarding all Government property provided for Contractor use. At the close of each work period, Government facilities, equipment and materials shall be secured Contractor personnel that require access to POD 10 infrastructure shall possess at a minimum a SECRET level as verified through the Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS). Prior to commencement of work, the Prime Contractor shall provide Visit Authorization Requests in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Manual (DOD 5220.22-M) and any instructions contained in the DD Form 254 (Contract Security Classification Specification), on all personnel that will be required to have access to DTRA infrastructure.

d) Entrance into the facility is Access Controlled and all persons and vehicles are subject to search.

All Contractor or sub-Contractor personnel shall be required to sign-in upon entry into the building unless a badge has been issued to the Contractor personnel. All Contractor personnel who work in the HQC shall be required to fill out the necessary information to obtain a badge.

All Contractor employees must receive a favorable background investigation. If the background investigations are unfavorable, HQC Command Security will make the determination to allow access to the HQC. The cost of the background investigation shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. Once the Contractor’s personnel have passed the background investigation, the Security Divisions will issue appropriate badges

5) OPSEC

a) AT Level I Training. "All contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access to Army installations, facilities, controlled access areas, or require network access, shall complete AT Level I awareness training within 30 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable. Upon request, the contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if a COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel. AT Level I awareness training is available at the following website:

http://jko.jten.mil/courses/atl1/launch.html ; or it can be provided by the RA ATO in presentation form which will be documented via memorandum."

b) Access and General Protection/Security Policy and Procedures. Per Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12), Common Access Cards (CAC) are required for contractors working six months or more; background investigations are required prior to CAC credential issuance. Uncleared contractors working less than six months must submit to a background check, via the appropriate Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services or Security Office, and must abide by applicable identification and access control requirements. Proposed language: "All contractor and all associated sub-contractors employees shall comply with applicable installation, facility and area commander installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures (provided by government representative). The contractor shall also provide all information required for background checks or background investigation and to meet installation/facility access requirements to be accomplished by installation Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services or Security Office. Contractor workforce must comply with all personal identity verification requirements as directed by DOD, HQDA and/or local policy. In addition to the changes otherwise authorized by the changes clause of this contract, should the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) at any installation or facility change, the Government may require changes in contractor security matters or processes."

c) Suspicious Activity Reporting Training (e.g. iWATCH, CorpsWatch, or See Something, Say

Something). "The contractor and all associated sub-contractors shall receive a brief/training (provided by the RA) on the local suspicious activity reporting program. This locally developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the project manager, security representative or law enforcement entity. This training shall be completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 5 calendar days after the completion of the training."

d) For Contracts that Require OPSEC Training. Per AR 530-1, (Operations Security) contractor employees must complete Level I OPSEC Training within 30 calendar days of contract award.

"All new contractor employees will complete Level I OPSEC Training within 30 calendar days of their reporting for duty. Additionally, all contractor employees must complete annual OPSEC awareness training. The contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if a COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training. OPSEC awareness training is available at the following websites: https://www.iad.gov/ioss/ or http://www.cdse.edu/catalog/operations-security.html ; or it can be provided by the RA OPSEC Officer in presentation form which will be documented via memorandum."

e) For Contracts That Require Handling or Access to Classified Information. This clause involves access to classified information, i.e. “Confidential,” “Secret,” or “Top Secret”.

"Contractor shall comply with AR 380-67 (Personnel Security Program) and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors) as well as FAR 52.204-2, Security Requirements. Additionally, Contractors must comply with - (1) The Security Agreement (DD Form 441), including the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DoD 5220.22-M); any revisions to DOD 5220.22-M, notice of which has been furnished to the contractor. For classified contracts, the DD Form 254 will be attached with the contract."

f) Will be escorted in areas where they may be exposed to classified and/or sensitive materials and/or sensitive or restricted areas. The contractor will coordinate with the COR and/or the facility security office for access when required. (Use when security clearances are not required, i.e. facility repair or construction). "All contract employees, including subcontractor employees who are not in possession of the appropriate security clearance or access privileges, will be escorted in areas where they may be exposed to classified and/or sensitive materials and/or sensitive or restricted areas."

g) Contractor Company to obtain a Facility Clearance and individual clearances at the appropriate level. "The Prime Contractor Company must have a Facility Clearance (FCL) at the appropriate level (IAW the NISPOM DOD 5220.22-M and AR 380-49) prior to the start of the contract awarded period of performance. Contractor personnel performing work under this contract must have the required security clearance, per AR 380-67, at the appropriate level at the start of the period of performance. Security Clearances and FCL requirements are required to be maintained for the life of the contract IAW the DD Form 254 attached to the contract. If no FCL, the supporting Government Contracting Activity will sponsor the prime contract company in obtaining the FCL."

6) SUBMITTALS

a) The Contractor will provide the Project Manager (6) Copies and (2) CD’s (with electronic PDF report file) for the Final Report Submission for PM Distribution to Government stakeholders.

b) OPTION (if option is exercised): Written results from one (1) follow-on day of use of leak detection technology / equipment to pin point, as exact as possible, the locations of concealed leaks as deemed necessary by the investigation team.

7) GOVERNMENT FURNISHED DATA

a) ATTACHMENT 1: RECENT LIST OF LEAKS FROM DLA—17 OCT 17

b) ATTACHMENT 2: ROOF PHOTOS

c) ATTACHMENT 3: INTERIOR PHOTOS OF LEAK LOCATIONS

8) POINTS OF CONTACT:

Baltimore District Project Manager (PM): O. M. “Chuck” Spangler, Jr. RA Phone: (703) 806-3208

Stakeholder Point-of-Contact: Tamberly Averett Phone: (703) 625-9653

9) SUBMISSION OF INVOICE

Original invoices for services performed under the contract will be submitted to and payment will be made by:

USPS:

ATTN: O. M. SPANGLER, JR.

CAPITAL AREA OFFICE, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

P. O. BOX 89

FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060

HAND-DELIVERED, FED EX, UPS, ETC:

ATTN: O. M. SPANGLER, JR.

CAPITAL AREA OFFICE, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

6050 1ST STREET

FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060

ATTACHMENT 1

RECENT LIST OF LEAKS FROM DLA 17

OCT 17

Leak buckets to empty:

1. 4235: 42L-D6

2. 4330: 43L-D5

3. 4300 Main Hall

4. 4530: DTRA language lab conference room ( fills a 50 gallon trash can when it rains even less than an inch)

5. 4539: Mickey Freeland’s office (lot side)

6. 4617: 46P-K6

7. 4629: 46P-A10

8. 4630: 46P-D5

9. 4630: hall outside of door, near access panel

10. 4729: 47P-A7

11. 4800/4900 round stairwell skylight (still leaking)

12. 4900 main hall

ATTACHMENT 2

ROOF PHOTOS

Void between original sealant and newly applied sealant at cast stone to brick connection

Parapet wall being prepared for new material. Parapet wall in final state.

Typical curtain wall to brick connection on wedge indent on “Pond Side” of headquarters.

Trash can collecting water above ceiling.

Stains on concrete slab from constant water leaks.

Cast stone parapet connection to curtain wall construction.

Recent sealant work on parapet connection to curtain wall construction.

“Wedge” roof construction.

Typical parapet wall. Typical parapet wall with scuppers.

Parapet wall with lightning protection. Roof of bow section

Typical skylight. Typical fan at skylights

Samples of wedges at expansion joints.

ATTACHMENT 3

INTERIOR PHOTOS OF LEAK LOCATIONS

QASP

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

Title II Service in support of DLA Investigate Leaks Entire Building

1. PURPOSE.

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

What will be monitored.

How monitoring will take place.

Who will conduct the monitoring.

How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen and uncontrollable situations may occur.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Updates shall ensure that the QASP remains a valid, useful, and enforceable document. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

a. Contracting Officer (KO) - The KO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The KO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The KO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned KO: Colette Day Organization or Agency: USACE Baltimore District Telephone: 410-962-2187 Email: Colette.B.Day@usace.army.mil

b. Contract Specialist (KS) - The contract specialist acts as an acquisition consultant and serves as liaison between the USACE and the requesting program office.

Assigned Contract Specialist: Gentian Mulla Telephone: (410) 962-2107 Email: Gentian.Mulla@usace.army.mil

c. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. At the conclusion of the contract or when requested by the KO, the

COR shall provide documentation to the KO. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. The contractor shall refer any changes they deem may affect contract price, terms, or conditions to the KO for action.

Assigned COR: O. M. “Chuck” Spangler, Jr.

Telephone: 703-806-3208 Email: Otto.m.spangler@usace.army.mil

O. M. “Chuck” Spangler, Jr. Title:

Project Manager Telephone: 703- 806-3208 Email: Otto.m.spangler@usace.army.mil

3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES:

The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s Program Manager TBD Telephone: TBD Email:

TBD

4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.

Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.

Reference Base Contract.

5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE.

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

Regardless of the surveillance method, the COR shall always contact the contractor's task manager or on- site representative when a defect is identified and inform the manager of the specifics of the problem.

The COR, with assistance from the Project Manager shall be responsible for monitoring the contractor’s performance in meeting a specific performance standards.

a. DIRECT OBSERVATION. This can be performed periodically or through 100% completion of tasks.

b. VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. Relies on the user of the service to identify deficiencies.

Complaints are then investigated and validated. Highly applicable to services provided in quantity and where quality is highly subjective.

d. Progress or status meetings.

8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE.

Documentation must be accurate and thorough. Completeness, currency, and accuracy support both satisfactory and unsatisfactory performance.

a. ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE.

The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for fixed fee payments, award fee payments, or other actions.

b. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE.

When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.

When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's task manager or on-site representative. A CDR template is attached to this QASP.

The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.

Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for contract payment deductions, fixed fee deductions, award fee nonpayment, or other actions deemed necessary by the KO.

W912DR18Q0040

CONTRACT DISCREPANCY REPORT (CDR)

1. Contract Number: <insert number>

2. TO: (Contractor Task Manager or on-site representative) <insert name>

3. FROM: (Name of COR)

4. Date and time observed discrepancy:

5. DISCREPANCY OR PROBLEM:

<Describe in detail. Identify any attachments.>

5. Corrective action plan:

A written corrective action plan < is / is not > required.

If a written corrective action plan is required include the following. The written Corrective Action Plan will be provided to the undersigned not later than 5 days after receipt of this

CDR.

Prepared by: <Enter COR’s name>

Signature – Contracting Officer’s Representative Date

Received by:

Signature –Contractor Program Manager or on-site representative Date

< The COR may initiate a CDR at any time, including whenever the number of monthly recorded defects for a performance standard exceeds the allowable number of defects;

anytime unacceptable performance is determined critical in nature and requires formal corrective action; and whenever an unfavorable trend is detected in contractor performance.>

PRIMARY CONTRACTING OFFICER

"The Primary Contracting Officer for this action is Colette Day, however, any Contracting Officer holding the appropriate warrant authority in the Baltimore District can serve as the Contracting Officer for this contract.

Also, please note that any time the primary KO changes, it will be incorporated into the contract via unilateral modification to the contract."

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2016 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and

Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.208-9 Contractor Use of Mandatory Sources of Supply or Services MAY 2014 52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic

Corporations

NOV 2015

52.209-11 Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law

FEB 2016

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items JAN 2017 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items JAN 2017 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting JAN 2017 52.223-2 Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts

SEP 2013

52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information MAY 2011 52.225-25 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain

Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran-- Representation and Certifications.

OCT 2015

52.229-3 Federal, State And Local Taxes FEB 2013 52.232-1 Payments APR 1984 52.232-18 Availability Of Funds APR 1984 52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014 52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And

Vegetation

APR 1984

52.237-3 Continuity Of Services JAN 1991 52.243-1 Changes--Fixed Price AUG 1987 52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Items NOV 2017 52.246-20 Warranty Of Services MAY 2001 252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7004 Alt A System for Award Management Alternate A FEB 2014 252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation

Support

MAY 2016

252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or Hazardous Materials

SEP 2014

252.223-7008 Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium JUN 2013 252.225-7001 Buy American And Balance Of Payments Program-- Basic

(Dec 2017)

DEC 2017

252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports

JUN 2012

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013 252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea APR 2014

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (NOV 2017)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 238160.

(2) The small business size standard is $15,000,000.

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b)(1) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (d) of this provision applies.

(2) If the provision at 52.204-7 is not included in this solicitation, and the offeror is currently…