A10_Solicitation_W912DR-16-T-0043.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

W912DR-16-T-0043 11-Jul-2016

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

410-962-0788

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

12:00 PM 09 Aug 2016

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

W912DR9. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

TAMARA C UDASCO

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

0 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED ORX

SMALL BUSINESS

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL

BUSINESS (WOSB)

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE

10 S. HOWARD STREET

ROOM 7000

BALTIMORE MD 21201

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BY

SEE SCHEDULE

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

FAX:

TEL: 410-962-2197 SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS

(EDWOSB)

SIZE STANDARD:

1,250 Employees

NAICS:

333132

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF33

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

Section SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERS/ SUBMISSION OF QUOTES:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Baltimore District has a requirement for a Track Mount Tilt Bed Drill Rig

The Government is using FAR Subparts 12 and 13 and will award a firm-fixed-priced contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible contractor whose quote conforms to the solicitation.

The Government anticipates award of a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Lowest Price (Cost) Technically Acceptable contractor, i.e. to the contractor with the lowest evaluated realistic price of quotes meeting the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than “Acceptable” must be achieved for the Technical factor. Award will be made with appropriate consideration given to the three evaluation factors: Factor 1-Technical, Factor 2 - Past Performance, and Factor 3-Cost/Price.

The Government intends to evaluate quotes and make award without questions to contractors. Therefore, the initial quote should contain the contractor's best terms from a Technical and Cost standpoint. Unclear quotes may not result in questions for clarifications. Offers with an omission or unclear quote may be judged to mean the contractor does not fully understand the requirements or understand what it takes to meet the requirements, regardless of the proposed cost/price and will be rated unacceptable. In that case, the contractor may be found unacceptable, and ineligible for award. The Government reserves the right to ask questions of contractors if the Contracting Officer determines them to be necessary.

Offerors must be registered on the System for Award Management (SAM) to be eligible for award. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. In order to be eligible for award, a contractor must be determined to be responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104.

Contractors shall submit their quotation with: one (1) electronic quote via email to Tamara Udasco at tamara.c.udasco@usace.army.mil, three (3) hard copies and two (2) CD-ROMs for the appendices, to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Tamara Udasco, 10 South Howard Street, Suite 7000, Baltimore, MD 21203-1715, no later than the time and date specified in the Submission of Quotes.

Quotes received after the required time and date deadline will not be evaluated.

QUESTIONS

Inquiries to end users or any personnel regarding this project are not permitted. Please direct any inquiries concerning this solicitation must be submitted by email no later than July 26th, 2016 at 12:00PM (EST). If you have any recommendations in accordance with the specifications and/or any portion of the Statement of Work (SOW), please state/ask them during this request for information (RFI) phase of this requirement. Email: tamara.c.udasco@usace.army.mil. No questions will be taken after that time.

No assumptions, conditions, caveats or exceptions submitted with quotes in response to this solicitation will be accepted or incorporated into the awarded contract. Any and all assumptions must be addressed and/or resolved through the use of the question and answer period specified above.

The offer shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. All pages shall be no smaller than 12 Point Font and in Times New Roman, appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and solicitation number in the header and/or footer. Factor 1 – Technical shall not exceed 25 pages;

Factor 2 – Past Performance: See Questionnaire for more instruction and not to exceed 10 pages; Factor 3

– Price – no page limit. All files shall be submitted with: one (1) electronic quote, three (3) hard copies and two (2) CD-ROMs for the appendices, as either a Microsoft Excel (.XLS) file, Microsoft Word, or Acrobat (PDF) file.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Quotes shall contain the following:

Cover letter on quoter’s letterhead, summarizing the pricing total and outlining quote terms and conditions, signed by the representative managing the project. Include Cage Code, DUNS # and Tax ID.

Price Schedule completed with all pricing.

Contractors shall submit their quotation with: one (1) electronic quote via email to Tamara Udasco at tamara.c.udasco@usace.army.mil, three (3) hard copies and two (2) CD-ROMs for the appendices, to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Tamara Udasco, 10 South Howard Street, Suite 7000, Baltimore, MD 21203-1715.

a) NOTE: Files shall not contain classified data or hyperlinks.

b) Each contractor is required to submit a quote consisting of three (3) volumes.

Volume 1 – Technical (no pricing information shall be included) – Technical submissions shall comply with Section 2.0 of the Statement of Work (SOW) and may include appendices to support the quote.

Volume II – Past Performance (No pricing information shall be included)

PAST PERFORMANCE SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Past performance information is required for this solicitation. Past performance information refers to the Contractor’s recent and relevant projects, as well as to the quality of the experience from the Customer’s perspective. In this solicitation, “recent” is considered to be within the past three (3) years, and “relevant” is considered to be “of similar size, scope and complexity” to the current requirement. If the Contractor does not have any relevant experience, a rating of “neutral” will be given and the Contractor will still be considered eligible for award.

The Contractor shall:

a) Send the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), provided as part of this solicitation, to each of the references identified and request that the reference complete the PPQ by the deadline stated in Box 8 of the solicitation. The completed PPQ’s must be returned by Customer directly to Tamara Udasco, Contract Specialist, e-mail at tamara.c.udasco@usace.army.mil. The Government will not release completed questionnaires to the contractor at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased responses and comments.

b) Contractors without recent or relevant past performance information should clearly state this in the quote.

Volume III – Cost/Pricing. No technical information shall be in the Cost/Pricing Volume submission.

Contractors shall include a Price Schedule complete with all pricing, inclusive of installation, material, project management and other cost. Note: Material and delivery should be for the total project as this will be a fixed-price contract.

Each contractor should also include a cover letter on company letterhead, summarizing the pricing total and outlining the contractors terms and conditions, signed by the representative managing the account. Include the contractor’s CAGE Code, TAX ID #, DUNS #, and SIN #.

The total price shall be equal to the sum of the total of all of the cost elements (Specified Items, Labor, and Materials). The Government will verify the contractor’s calculation of the total offered price.

Each volume shall be submitted via separate files. Any pages that are changed (as a result of quote revisions) shall be dated. Each volume shall be clearly named with its Title, Submission Date, Solicitation Number and copy number.

The following volumes of material shall be submitted Volume I- Technical, limit 25 pages via one (1) electronically, three (3) hard copies and two (2) CD-ROM for the appendices.

(No pricing information shall be listed). Volume II – Past Performance, limit 10 pages via email. Volume III – Price, No page limitation.

Specific Requirements: A quote will consist of all information and material submitted via email for evaluation in response to this solicitation. The submission of false or misleading information will be grounds for disqualification of the quote. Information requested that is missing may be ground of disqualification.

BASIS FOR AWARD

The Government anticipates award of a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Lowest Price Technically Acceptable offeror, i.e., to the offeror with the lowest evaluated realistic price of quotes meeting the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than “Acceptable” must be achieved for the Technical factor and all enumerated paragraphs there under.

Factor 1 – Technical, Factor 2 – Past Performance, Factor 3 – Cost/Price.

The Government intends to evaluate quotes and make award without questions to offerors. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial quote should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a Technical and Cost standpoint.

Unclear quotes may not result in questions for clarifications. Offers with an omission or unclear quote may be judged to mean the contractor does not fully understand the requirements or understand what it takes to me the requirements, regardless of the proposed cost/price and will be rated unacceptable. In that case, the Offeror may be found unacceptable, and ineligible for award. The Government reserves the right to ask questions if the Contracting Officer determines them to be necessary.

EVALUATION CRITIERIA

The following evaluation factors will be used. Award will be made with appropriate consideration based upon the evaluation factors described below:

FACTOR 1 –TECHNICAL

The offeror will be evaluated to ensure all items below were provided:

1. Technical submissions shall comply with Section 2.0 of the Statement of Work (SOW) and may include the appendices to support the quote.

2. Technical Ratings:

The following adjectival ratings will be assigned to the technical factor.

Adjectival Ratings Definitions

Acceptable Offer clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Offer does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE:

1. Past performance information is required for this solicitation. Past performance information refers to the Contractor’s recent and relevant projects, as well as to the quality of the experience from the Customer’s perspective. In this solicitation, “recent” is considered to be within the past three

(3) years, and “relevant” is considered to be “of similar size, scope and complexity” to the current requirement. If the Contractor does not have any relevant experience, a rating of “neutral” will be given and the Contractor will still be considered eligible for award.

Contractors without recent or relevant past performance information should clearly state this in the quote.

FACTOR 3 – COST/PRICE:

Contractors shall include a Price Schedule complete with all pricing, inclusive of installation, material, project management and other cost. Note: Material and delivery should be for the total project as this will be a fixed-price contract.

Each contractor should also include a cover letter on company letterhead, summarizing the pricing total and outlining the contractors terms and conditions, signed by the representative managing the account.

Include the contractor’s CAGE Code, TAX ID #, DUNS #, and SIN #.

The total price shall be equal to the sum of the total of all of the cost elements (Specified Items and Materials). The Government will verify the contractor’s calculation of the total offered price.

PAST PERFORMANCE

PAST PERFORMANCE SUBMISSION: (See Attached Past Performance Questionnaire)

Submission Requirements: Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the customer’s perspective. The Offeror shall arrange for the reference customer point of contact for two (2) projects to fill out the Questionnaire and return to Tamara Udasco, Contract Specialist, and e-mail tamara.c.udasco@usace.army.mil. The questionnaires must be forwarded directly by the references.

Ensure the reference is clearly marked for the applicable Offeror at submission. The Government will not release the questionnaire forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased responses and comments. Two (2) references from previously completed jobs must be submitted and include a point of contact and phone numbers. These references must be relevant to the work which will be performed in this contract. Relevant work is defined as providing fabrication of similar drill rigs per the Scope of Work (SOW). References must be recent within the past three (3) years.

Evaluation Criteria: The Government will assess the degree of success of Offeror’s recent, relevant past performance. Owners/references will be asked to comment on items such as, timeliness, management of subcontractor work, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between customer and contractor, level of support for such things as correcting errors. Any offeror who has demonstrated satisfactory past performance will be considered eligible for award. Any offeror who demonstrated unsatisfactory past performance will not be considered eligible for award. If the Government does not obtain past performance information for the projects identified by the offeror and cannot establish a past performance record for the offeror through other sources, or if the offeror has no past performance record and cannot tie significant, relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project to cited experience, past performance will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably

USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the customer’s perspective. The Offeror shall arrange for the reference customer point of contact for two (2) projects to fill out the Questionnaire and return directly to Tamara Udasco, Contract Specialist, e-mail at tamara.c.udasco@usace.army.mil. The questionnaires must be forwarded directly by the references.

Ensure the reference is clearly marked for the applicable Offeror when submitted. The Government will not release the questionnaire forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased responses and comments. Two (2) references from previously completed jobs must be submitted and include a point of contact and phone numbers. These references must be relevant to the work which will be performed in this contract. Relevant work is defined as fabricating drill rigs and on-site training . References must be recent within the past three (3) years.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced E VG S M U N

W912DR-16-T-0043

cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

STATEMENT OF WORK

STATEMENT OF WORK

Track Mount Tilt Bed Drill Rig

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Baltimore District

1.0 Introduction

This requirement is for supplies for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Baltimore District’s Field Exploration Unit (FEU). This a firm fixed-price purchase order for the purchase of commercial supplies to include:

Fabrication, 1-Year Warranty, and Training for a new Track Mount Tilt Bed Drill Rig

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District Field Exploration Unit (FEU) performs critical in-house drilling services, requires information on procuring a drill rig. The FEU is requesting a new Track-Mount Tilt-Bed Drill Rig be built to replace an aging track mount tilt bed drill rig. The track mount tilt bed rig will be utilized to perform drilling on steep embankments often associated with dam and levee evaluations. The ability to access locations along steep embankments is critical to performing in-house services within the North Atlantic Division as well as Corps-wide. The two features which make this rig ideal for steep embankment access are the track mounted and tilt bed capabilities. The track mounted capabilities allow the rig to easily maneuver over tough, rocky terrain.

2.0 Requirements and Technical Specifications

The vendor shall adhere to the specifications provided by USACE herein for the fabrication of track mount tilt bed drill rig. The unit shall be completely assembled and fully equipped in accordance with the specifications and ready for operation when delivered. The drill unit shall be thoroughly field tested and ready for immediate and continuous operation at time of delivery.

The drill rig shall meet the following Technical Specifications:

1) Integrated Track and Carrier System (from same designer)

2) On Rig Storage for Augers (racks should not impede approach angle ability), Rods (rod box and rod slide), and Drilling Tools (such as hammer pocket for handling 6” and 8” bits)

3) Independent Track Control and Wireless Remote Control

4) 4 Derrick Winches including 1 Mainline with jib, Wireline/Sandline Winches (Dynawinch

CA2-615 or equivalent), 1 hydraulic jib boom with hydraulic swing and extension and 4,000 lbs.

5) Steel Skid Pan

6) < = 8 foot width (maximum 8’ 6” width only if required due to rig load)

7) > = 24,500 lbs. pull back

8) > = 18,000 lbs. pull down

9) > 45 degree Tilt-bed Angle Drilling Ability with all braces and legs included (stowable in-place during movement), for work area uphill of rig

10) > = 15” in/out table movement -

11) > = 6” side table/head movement

12) > = 14,500 ft lbs. rotary torque

13) > = 600 RPM for coring operation

14) 140/300 lb Auto Hammer

15) >= 24 inch track width, steel track shoe with bolted rubber pads

16) >= 40,000 lbs tractive force

17) < = 3 psi ground bearing pressure

18) < = 11’ inside turning radius

19) Rotary drilling transmission 4 speed fwd, 1 speed rev., or hydrostatic

20) Carrier transmission 2-speed hydrostatic with forward and reverse

21) Rig corner anchor eyes (for anchoring while on slopes without brakes engaged)

22) 7.5” x 10” Duplex Hydraulic Mud Pump with gardner denver type valves with bolt down valve caps, and shear type relief valve (Centerline Manufacturing Co. CLM 7½" x 10" Duplex Hydraulic Mud Pump or equivalent)

23) 3-Stage Progressive Cavity Pump with > =100 gpm, 225psi, 15HP motor (Moyno 3L8 or equivalent)

24) > = 27 foot Derrick

25) 4 Jack Tubes > = 60 inches in length (outrigger H-style “out and down type” w/ min. 24” extension and residual release valves on cylinder) with valves built into cylinder no hose between cylinder and valve.

26) Mud plumbing all steel (Schedule. 80) with pressure fittings (boss fittings, hammer lock unions and whip checks) on the pressure side of pump, no cam locks overhead.

27) Complete set of chucks and table slips with hydraulic chuck system

28) 36", 48" and 60" break out wrenches

29) Anchor Point in Derrick Crown for Fall Protection and Derrick Ladder if Tubular Mast

30) Front and rear hydraulic winches (30,000 lbs. each) (Ramsey RPH 30,000 or equivalent), capable of full power while simultaneously fully powering the tracks.

31) All required subs and gimbal for augering

32) > = 23 foot stroke

33) onboard > =1050/350 air compressor and down the hole hammer line oiler (Doosan/Ingersoll

Rand HR2.5 or equivalent)

34) Water injection pump > = 15 gpm at 600 psi (Bean E0413 or equivalent)

35) Mast strength >= 50,000 lbs.

36) Bank of four open hydraulic valves for future applications

37) 3 x 2 x 11 inch centrifugal pump (Mission 1180 or equivalent)

38) 565 Horse Power Deck Engine (Caterpillar C15 or equivalent)

39) Low oil and high temperature shutdown sensors for compressor, engine, and hydraulic systems.

40) Fuel system capacity minimum of 12 hours at full load.

41) On-board removable vise for breaking split-spoon samplers.

42) All periodic maintenance items must be accessible and user serviceable.

43) Operation of all systems within an environmental temperature range of 10 to 120 degrees

Fahrenheit.

44) Six tool hangers on driller side, and six tool hangers on helper side.

45) Anchors on derrick to secure winch cables during transport.

Additional Requirements:

The drill rig is to be delivered in operating condition with acceptance subject to inspection and approval to the USACE Baltimore District’s Field Exploration Unit Warehouse located at Aberdeen Proving Ground – Edgewood Area, Edgewood, MD 21040.

The successful vendor shall provide manufacturer’s approved training to familiarize personnel with the correct operation and servicing procedures for the equipment delivered at a time and place agreed upon by the Government.

The successful vendor shall provide a minimum one year warranty on the drill rig.

All items which require periodic lubrication shall be provided with a suitable lubrication fitting.

Two hard copies and two CD-ROM electronic versions of the manufacturer's service manual containing operating instructions, maintenance instructions and a bill of material or parts list shall be furnished by the manufacturer.

All pressure systems shall be provided with suitable pressure relief valves. With the exception of the drilling tools, all moving parts that may present a potential hazard to personnel while operating or performing maintenance shall be fully enclosed or properly guarded to ensure the safety of personnel conducting operating and performing maintenance. Protective devices shall not impair the operating functions.

All water and mud pumps shall have easily accessible drain plugs. Exception allowed for water injection pump.

All pumps will be easily accessible for maintenance.

All valves on mud system will be designed for use on a mud rotary with controls at driller’s station. No ball valves or gate valves.

The equipment to be furnished under these specifications shall be warranted against defective design, materials and workmanship as standard with the manufacturer. Two hard copies and two CD-ROM electronic versions of the manufacturer's standard guaranty or warranty shall be furnished.

3.0 Period of Performance

This is a firm–fixed-price purchase order. The period of performance on this purchase order is eighteen (18) months from date of award.

QASP

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP) FOR

Track Mount Tilt Bed Drill Rig U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Baltimore District

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requires the fabrication, a one year warranty, and training for a new track mount tilt bed drill rig. The track mount tilt bed drill rig will be utilized to perform drilling on steep embankments often associated with dam and levee evaluations; the one year warranty will ensure that all the drill rig components are functioning properly; and the training is to ensure that all operators understand each drill rig component and the appropriate means to operator and maintain each component.

PROJECT PRODUCTS AND SURVEILLANCE:

The Vendor shall, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the referenced contract, furnish all services, materials, supplies, plant, labor, investigations, studies, superintendence, and travel as necessary for the performance of the project work products specified in the Scope of Work. The method of surveillance will be documented through the attached Quality Assurance Monitoring Form (QAMF) and/or Quality Assurance Report (QAR), as applicable.

PRODUCT Method of Surveillance 1 Track Mount Tilt Bed Drill Rig 100% USACE Inspection 2 1-Year Warranty 100% USACE Inspection 3 Training 100% USACE Inspection

AREAS OF EVALUATION:

The following issues will be evaluated through the course of the project. These factors will be evaluated through the use of the following qualifiers: satisfactory or unsatisfactory. These qualifiers are defined in Attachment A.

Performance Standard Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

Quality - The drill rig is delivered completely assembled and fully equipped in accordance with the specifications and ready for immediate operation.

- Training includes all aspects of correctly operating and servicing the drill rig.

- Drill rig is not delivered completely assembled and fully equipped in accordance with the specifications and ready for immediate operation.

- Training does not include all aspects of correctly operating and servicing the drill rig.

Schedule - The drill rig is delivered and - The drill rig and training are not training is completed within 18 months of notice to proceed.

- The vendor has technical personnel readily available to respond to one year warranty requests.

completed within 18 months.

- The vendor does not have technical personnel readily available to respond to one year warranty requests.

Resource Management The vendor ensures knowledgeable technical personnel manufacture the drill rig based on the specifications and provides knowledgeable technical personnel to train USACE personnel.

The vendor does not provide knowledgeable technical personnel to manufacture the drill rig based on the specifications and does not provide knowledgeable technical personnel to train USACE personnel.

QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORING:

QA monitoring of this project will occur through USACE oversight and feedback from the customer.

With appropriate input, the USACE Project Manager (PM) and Contracting Officer Representative (COR) will use the QAMF in Attachment A to document the observed quality, schedule, and resources management of the project and project deliverables. The QAMF will include information on delivery, maintenance and removal of equipment and payments to percent project completions by the vendor.

Other input to surveillance includes the Quality Assurance Record (QAR) included in Attachment B.

QARs should be completed by individuals completing review of project deliverables.

ATTACHMENT A

QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORING FORM

Date:

Milestone/Deliverable: Track Mount Tilt Bed Drill Rig

Survey Period: date – date

Project Manager: name

Corrective Action Required: Yes _____ No X

Narrative Discussion of Vendor Performance During Survey Period:

Evaluation Ratings Definitions

Satisfactory – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the vendor appear or were satisfactory. To justify a satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the vendor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD Policy, a fundamental principle assigning ratings is that vendors will not be assessed a rating lower than satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

Unsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the vendor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. To justify an unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the vendor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the vendor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety or environmental deficiency report or letter).

ATTACHMENT B

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD

VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

DATE OF EVALUATION: PROJECT MANAGER:

PROJECT NAME:

VENDOR:

PROJECT PRODUCT:

ATTRIBUTES RATINGS

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

Quality of product or service

Schedule

Resource Management

REMARKS:

Number of Final Submittals that were required due to poor performance:

Recommend Vendor for future projects:

(Yes, No, Conditional)

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees MAY 2014 52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures MAY 2014 52.203-8 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or

Improper Activity

MAY 2014

52.203-10 Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity MAY 2014 52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement

To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

APR 2014

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance JUL 2013 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and

Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items MAY 2015 52.222-20 Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment

Exceeding $15,000

MAY 2014

52.223-6 Drug-Free Workplace MAY 2001 52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging

While Driving

AUG 2011

52.229-3 Federal, State And Local Taxes FEB 2013 52.232-1 Payments APR 1984 52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004 52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.242-15 Stop-Work Order AUG 1989 52.243-1 Changes--Fixed Price AUG 1987 52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Items FEB 2016 52.246-2 Inspection Of Supplies--Fixed Price AUG 1996 52.249-2 Termination For Convenience Of The Government (Fixed-

Price)

APR 2012

52.249-8 Default (Fixed-Price Supply & Service) APR 1984 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.204-7004 Alt A System for Award Management Alternate A FEB 2014 252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

Controls

DEC 2015

252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting.

DEC 2015

252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or Hazardous Materials

SEP 2014

252.223-7008 Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium JUN 2013 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR

EXECUTIVE ORDERS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (MAR 2016)

(a) The Contractor shall comply with the following Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, which are incorporated in this contract by reference, to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items:

(1) 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (Nov 2015).

(2) 52.233-3, Protest After Award (AUG 1996) (31 U.S.C. 3553).

(3) 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (OCT 2004) (Public Laws 108-77 and 108-78 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note)).

(b) The Contractor shall comply with the FAR clauses in this paragraph (b) that the Contracting Officer has indicated as being incorporated in this contract by reference to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items: (Contracting Officer check as appropriate.)

X (1) 52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (Sept 2006), with Alternate I (Oct 1995) (41 U.S.C. 4704 and 10 U.S.C. 2402).

____ (2) 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (Oct 2015) (41 U.S.C. 3509).

____ (3) 52.203-15, Whistleblower Protections under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (June 2010) (Section 1553 of Pub. L. 111-5). (Applies to contracts funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.)

X (4) 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Oct 2015) (Pub. L. 109-

282) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note).

___ (5) [Reserved]

___ (6) 52.204-14, Service Contract Reporting Requirements (JAN 2014) (Pub. L. 111-117, section 743 of Div. C).

___ (7) 52.204-15, Service Contract Reporting Requirements for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts (JAN 2014) (Pub. L.

111-117, section 743 of Div. C).

X (8) 52.209-6, Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (Oct 2015) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note).

X (9) 52.209-9, Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (July 2013) (41 U.S.C. 2313).

____ (10) [Reserved]

____ (11)(i) 52.219-3, Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or Sole-Source Award (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 657a).

____ (ii) Alternate I (NOV 2011) of 52.219-3.

____ (12) (i) 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns (OCT 2014) (if the offeror elects to waive the preference, it shall so indicate in its offer) (15 U.S.C. 657a).

____ (ii) Alternate I (JAN 2011) of 52.219-4.

____ (13) [Reserved]

____ (14)(i) 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644).

____ (ii) Alternate I (NOV 2011).

____ (iii) Alternate II (NOV 2011).

____ (15)(i) 52.219-7, Notice of Partial Small Business Set-Aside (June 2003) (15 U.S.C. 644).

____ (ii) Alternate I (Oct 1995) of 52.219-7.

____ (iii) Alternate II (Mar 2004) of 52.219-7.

____ (16) 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (OCT 2014) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3)).

____ (17)(i) 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Oct 2015) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)).

____ (ii) Alternate I (Oct 2001) of 52.219-9.

____ (iii) Alternate II (Oct 2001) of 52.219-9.

____ (iv) Alternate III (Oct 2015) of 52.219-9.

____ (18) 52.219-13, Notice of Set-Aside of Orders (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644(r)).

____ (19) 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(14)).

____ (20) 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages—Subcon-tracting Plan (Jan 1999) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(F)(i)).

____ (21) 52.219-27, Notice of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C.

657f).

____ (22) 52.219-28, Post Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation (July 2013) (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)).

____ (23) 52.219-29, Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole Source Award to, Economically Disadvantaged Women- Owned Small Business Concerns (Dec 2015) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).

____(24) 52.219-30, Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole Source Award to, Women-Owned Small Business Concerns Eligible Under the Women-Owned Small Business Program (Dec 2015) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).

X (25) 52.222-3, Convict Labor (June 2003) (E.O. 11755).

X (26) 52.222-19, Child Labor--Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (FEB 2016) (E.O. 13126).

X (27) 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Apr 2015).

X (28) 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (Apr 2015) (E.O. 11246).

X (29) 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (Oct 2015) (38 U.S.C. 4212).

X (30) 52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities (July 2014) (29 U.S.C. 793).

X (31) 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (FEB 2016) (38 U.S.C. 4212).

X (32) 52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act (Dec 2010) (E.O.

13496).

X (33)(i) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (March 2, 2015) (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).

____ (ii) Alternate I (March 2, 2015) of 52.222-50 (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).

X (34) 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification (Oct 2015). (E. O. 12989). (Not applicable to the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items or certain other types of commercial items as prescribed in 22.1803.)

____ (35)(i) 52.223-9, Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA–Designated Items (May 2008) (42 U.S.C. 6962(c)(3)(A)(ii)). (Not applicable to the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items.)

____ (ii) Alternate I (May 2008) of 52.223-9 (42 U.S.C. 6962(i)(2)(C)). (Not applicable to the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items.)

____ (36) (i) 52.223-13, Acquisition of EPEAT® Registered Imaging Equipment (Jun 2014) (E.O.s 13423 and 13514).

____ (ii) Alternate I (OCT 2015) of 52.223-13.

____ (37)(i) 52.223-14, Acquisition of EPEAT® Registered Televisions (Jun 2014) (E.O.s 13423 and 13514).

____ (ii) Alternate I (Jun 2014) of 52.223-14.

____ (38) 52.223-15, Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming Products (Dec 2007) (42 U.S.C. 8259b).

____ (39)(i) 52.223-16, Acquisition of EPEAT[supreg]-Registered Personal Computer Products (OCT 2015) (E.O.s 13423 and 13514).

____ (ii) Alternate I (Jun 2014) of 52.223-16.

____ (40) 52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving (Aug 2011) (E.O.

13513).

____ (41) 52.225-1, Buy American--Supplies (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 83).

____(42) (i) 52.225-3, Buy American--Free Trade Agreements--Israeli Trade Act (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 83, 19 U.S.C. 3301 note, 19 U.S.C. 2112 note, 19 U.S.C. 3805 note, 19 U.S.C. 4001 note, Pub. L.

103-182, 108-77, 108-78, 108-286, 108-302, 109-53, 109-169, 109-283, 110-138, 112-41, 112-42, and 112-43.

____ (ii) Alternate I (May 2014) of 52.225-3.

____ (iii) Alternate II (May 2014) of 52.225-3.

____ (iv) Alternate III (May 2014) of 52.225-3.

____ (43) 52.225-5, Trade Agreements (FEB 2016) (19 U.S.C. 2501, et seq., 19 U.S.C. 3301 note).

X (44) 52.225-13, Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases (June 2008) (E.O.’s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury).

____ (45) 52.225-26, Contractors Performing Private Security Functions Outside the United States (Jul 2013) (Section 862, as amended, of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008; 10 U.S.C. 2302 Note).

____ (46) 52.226-4, Notice of Disaster or Emergency Area Set-Aside (Nov 2007) (42 U.S.C. 5150

____ (47) 52.226-5, Restrictions on Subcontracting Outside Disaster or Emergency Area (Nov 2007) (42 U.S.C.

5150).

____ (48) 52.232-29, Terms for Financing of Purchases of Commercial Items (Feb 2002) (41 U.S.C. 4505, 10 U.S.C. 2307(f)).

____ (49) 52.232-30, Installment Payments for Commercial Items (Oct 1995) (41 U.S.C. 4505, 10 U.S.C. 2307(f)).

____ (50) 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer—System for Award Management (July 2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332).

X (51) 52.232-34, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer—Other than System for Award Management (July 2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332).

____ (52) 52.232-36, Payment by Third Party (MAY 2014) (31 U.S.C. 3332).

____ (53) 52.239-1, Privacy or Security Safeguards (Aug 1996) (5 U.