Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 72 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cranes and Hoists Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912D0-17-R-0005
About this file
Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Response_to_Industry_Questions.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_Performance_Work_Statement_Cranes_and_Hoists_(13_MAR_2017).pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_CLIN_Structure_Bid_Sheet_v2_(13_MAR_2017).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_4_-_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Combined_Synopsis_for_Cranes_and_Hoists_(13_March_2017).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer, Raymond Padgett III at raymond.padegtt5.civ@mail.mil within 3 days of receipt.
Adjectival Rating Definitions:
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division: _______________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________________ Program Identification/Title: _______________________________________________ Contract Number: _______________________________________________________ Contract Type: _________________________________________________________ Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): __________ Contract Award Date: ____________________________________________________ Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: _______________________________ Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased: ____________________________ mailto:raymond.padegtt5.civ@mail.mil
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name: ________________________________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________________ E-mail Address: ________________________________________________________
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Acceptable
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Acceptable
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
Acceptable
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Acceptable
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company? ____________ If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization: __________________________________________________________ Name: ________________________________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________________ E-mail Address: ________________________________________________________
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer at raymond.padgett5.civ@mail.mil.
Thank you for your assistance.
mailto:raymond.padgett5.civ@mail.mil
| A CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION: |
| ContractorCompany NameDivision: |
| Address: |
| Program IdentificationTitle: |
| Contract Number: |
| Contract Type: |
| Prime Contractor Name if different from the contractor name cited above: |
| Contract Award Date: |
| Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: |
| Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased: |
| Name: |
| Date: |
| Telephone Number: |
| Address_2: |
| Email Address: |
| Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company: |
| Organization: |
| Name_2: |
| Title: |
| Date_2: |
| Telephone Number_2: |
| Address_3: |
| Email Address_2: |
| Text1: |
| Text2: |
| Text3: |
| Text4: |
| Text5: |
| Text6: |
| Text7: |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Check Box34: Off |
| Check Box35: Off |
| Check Box36: Off |
| Check Box37: Off |
| Check Box38: Off |
| Check Box39: Off |
| Check Box40: Off |
| Check Box41: Off |
| Check Box42: Off |
| Check Box43: Off |
| Check Box44: Off |
| Check Box45: Off |
| Check Box46: Off |
| Check Box47: Off |
| Check Box48: Off |
| Check Box49: Off |
| Check Box50: Off |
| Check Box51: Off |
| Check Box52: Off |
| Check Box53: Off |
| Check Box54: Off |
| Check Box55: Off |
| Check Box56: Off |
| Check Box57: Off |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .