Amd__0001 _W912BV-16-R-0055 _Parcel_3_Ft_Wingate.pdf
PDF 668 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FWDA Parcel 3 Closure & Corrective Action at Fort Wingate Depot Activity, McKinley County, New Mexico
- Solicitation number
- W912BV-16-R-0055
About this file
Amendment 0001 to Solicitation W912BV-16-R-0055 Parcel 3 Fort Wingate
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Parcel 3 Closure & Corrective Action for Fort Wingate Depot Activity, New Mexico
This Amendment is being issued to replace the Performance Work Statement (PWS); Section L, Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents; and the Bidder's Inquiry Info Section . The Bidder Inquiry System w ill be unavailable for new inquiries 14 days prior to the proposal due date.
The proposal due date is hereby extended to 8 March 2016, 3:00pm (CST). Point of contact for this action is Brenda Anderson, 918-669-7274.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
1 116
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 03-Feb-2016
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912BV-16-R-0055
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
13-Jan-2016
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
03-Feb-2016
CODE
CONTRACTING DIV
USACE, TULSA 1645 S 101 E AVE
TULSA OK 74128-4609
W912BV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
W912BV-16-R-0055
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been added by full text:
AMD #0001 BIDDERS INQUIRY SHEE
AMENDMENT NO. 0001
INQUIRIES – OFFEROR’S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
USE OF BIDDER’S INQUIRY
Prospective offerors should submit questions and inquiries related to this solicitation in accordance with the following (collect calls will not be accepted):
a. For information related to amendments, and the dates set for receipt of proposals, please check http://www.fedbizopps.gov
b. Contractual and Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at https://www.projnet.org/projnet.
1. To submit and review bid inquiry items, offerors will need to be a current registered user or self-register into the system. To self-register go to the aforementioned web page and click on the BID tab. Select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, and enter the Bidder Inquiry Key for this solicitation listed below, your e-mail address, and then click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue.
2. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add an inquiry.
3. Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via e-mail, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed.
4. The Solicitation Number is: W912BV-16-R-0055 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: AHN5GT-HGU3U4
c. The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquiries 4:00pm (Central) Wednesday, 3 February 2016 14 days prior to the proposal due date in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.
d. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, and review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.
e. The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.
f. Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.
g. The point of contact for this solicitation is:
Contract Specialist: Brenda Anderson Telephone: 918-669-7274 E-MAIL: Brenda.K.Anderson@usace.army.mil
AMD #0001 PWS
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT
FOR
FWDA PARCEL 3 CLOSURE & CORRECTIVE ACTION
AT
FORT WINGATE DEPOT ACTIVITY
McKINLEY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
Solicitation Number W912BV-16-R-0055 Contract Number TBD
USACE Tulsa District Oklahoma
January 13, 2016
Amendment #0001 2 February 2016
1. General: This is a non-personal services contract to perform a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Closure, Corrective Action (including removal) environmental remediation activities at Fort Wingate Depot Activity (FWDA) located in McKinley County, New Mexico. The Government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein.
Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the Contractor who, in turn is responsible to the Government.
This Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the scope of a full range of performance based environmental remediation activities to achieve significant milestones towards the goal of completing environmental remediation of FWDA and the eventual return of the property to the Navajo and Zuni peoples. The work to be performed under this PWS will be executed as a performance-based, firm fixed-price Type “C” Contract. The contractor is ultimately responsible for meeting all performance objectives within the contract Period of Performance (PoP). Performance Objectives and Standards are presented in Table 1 below. Reference the map under Attachment 1 for the location of designated Areas, Management Units, Areas of Concern, etc.
TABLE 1 -PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS
Parcel 3 Closure and Corrective Action
Task/Option Performance Objective Performance Standard
Inner Fence Area Task 2 Corrective Action Complete
NMED Approved Final Completion Report
CAMU Closure Task 5 Site Closure NMED Approved Final Closure Report, Class III Permit Modification, and NMED approval of removing the CAMU from the Permit
HWMU Closure Task 6 Site Closure NMED Approved Final Closure Report, Class III Permit Modification, and NMED approval of removing the HWMU from the Permit
North Arroyo Area Interim MEC Removal
Task 8 Corrective Action Complete
NMED Approved Final Completion Report
Parcel 3 - SWMUs and AOCs Permit Class III Modification
Task 9 Corrective Action Complete and Conduct Class III mod, documentation, meetings and notices
NMED Approved Final Completion Report and Class III Permit Modification
2. Introduction: The FWDA is located in McKinley County, New Mexico, approximately eight miles east of Gallup, NM. The inactive Depot currently occupies approximately 15,277 acres. The FWDA was originally established by the U.S. Army in 1862 as a frontier outpost. In 1918, the Depot’s mission changed from tribal issues to support activities for the nation’s involvement in World War I. Beginning in 1940, FWDA was charged primarily with receiving, storage and shipping explosives and military munitions to Allied Forces, as well as disassembly and disposing of unserviceable or obsolete explosives and military munitions. In January 1993, the active mission of the FWDA was curtailed and the installation closed as a result of the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Act of 1990 (BRAC). In 2005, environmental activities began under Permit EPA ID No. NM 6213820974 (FWDA RCRA Permit) which was finalized in December 2005. In 2014, Permit NM 6213820974 was modified to allow for operation of the Corrective Actions Management Unit (CAMU) located in Parcel 3. The Permit will be renewed in the fourth quarter 2015/third quarter 2016 thus all references are to the existing Permit. Once the government receives a copy of the new Permit, it will be distributed to the offer. The contractor shall comply with the new Permit once it has been issued. The government does not anticipate the new Permit will change project requirements. FWDA is currently undergoing final environmental characterization and restoration activities prior to the property’s ultimate transfer and reuse outside the Department of Defense. The government’s overall and end state objective of this contract is to achieve no further action status for all project areas within Parcel 3. In conjunction with the government’s end state objective;
ALL PARCEL 3 RELATED FIELD WORK must be completed on or before September 30, 2022 or earlier. All references to Closure in this contract refers to Closure completed without controls as defined in the Permit. Permit Section III does state that the Permittee may seek a determination from NMED that removal or decontamination of soils is not practicable using the procedures in Permit Attachment 7, Section 7.7.2. However the government (and contractor) will (shall) not seek such a determination. The contractor is responsible for attaining the performance standards and cleanup levels for this contract. The remaining tasks are summarized below. All documents will be reviewed by the Army prior to submission to the Navajo Nation, Pueblo of Zuni, NMED and EPA.
The contractor is not responsible for interim groundwater monitoring, groundwater monitoring in Section V of the Permit or Groundwater Investigation or Corrective Action under Section VI. Closure requirements under this contract shall not involve groundwater.
Multiple plans are required under this contract in order to meet all NMED requirements under the RCRA Permit and the BRAC Office’s requirement for accelerated closure and corrective action at Parcel 3 prior to September 30, 2022.
Removal of the Hazardous Waste Management Unit (HWMU) per the RCRA Permit and NMED approved HWMU Removal Work Plan dated December 2012 to continue the removal work initiated by others. The contractor shall also implement the requirements specified in the NMED approval WITH MODIFICATIONS (letter dated January 24, 2013) which approved the work plan. Removal of the HWMU involves excavation, sifting, stockpiling, testing, and disposal of massive amounts of debris, soil, munitions, and improved conventional munitions. Clean soil (as determined by testing) shall be placed back in the excavation in areas with clean excavation bottoms. This task will include the construction, operation, and maintenance of sifting plant(s) to process all excavated material, the disposal of MEC, and inspection, certification, explosive safety characterization and recycling of all material potentially presenting an explosive hazard (MPPEH) and range related debris (RRD) removed. Contractor shall use and amend the current approved HWMU Removal work plan (2012). Amendment(s) will not change NMED specifications such as size of material to be removed, sampling requirements, soil stockpile size, Thermal Flashing Unit (TFU) procedures, etc. Contractor will submit work plan amendments to be performed in parallel with mobilization efforts and implementation of the NMED approved HWMU Work Plan. Note: NMED approved HWMU Removal Work Plan dated December 2012 is NOT the HWMU Closure Plan, but was prepared in an effort to initiate work quickly. This effort accomplishes a significant portion of the Closure requirements of section III of the Permit, but is not the official closure of the HWMU.
Prepare and implement the RCRA HWMU Closure Plan for the HWMU per the Permit. Most of the effort for the RCRA Closure is accomplished in the above task, however the Closure Plan shall cover all the remaining efforts required in Permit Section III not addressed in the above referenced work plan. The Closure Plan shall address all contaminated soil not covered in the existing HWMU work plan, namely soils above cleanup levels in the base of the excavation as mentioned in the HWMU work plan. The Closure Plan shall also address all contaminated soil adjacent to but beyond the 32 acre HWMU boundary. The Closure Plan shall include areas adjacent to the HWMU as mentioned in Permit Section III.B. Note: Area of Concern (AOC) 92 MEC Removal is being addressed by others. Soil removal at AOC 92 shall not be addressed under the HWMU Closure Plan, but under the Corrective Action under Task 9. The NMED approved work plan shall be referenced in the Closure Plan. The contractor shall perform all Permit modifications, documents, public notices, and public meetings required for the Closure of the HWMU. The government will lead coordination of all Permit modifications and stakeholder interactions and the contractor shall provide all technical, support personnel, documenting, research, and provide and pay for all meeting venues and notices. Implementation of the Closure Plan shall include all excavation, permitting (i.e. 401/404, SWPPP), disposal, testing, backfilling, maintaining the arroyo, wetlands mitigation if required, grading, and seeding/re-vegetation.
Prepare a HWMU Closure Report in accordance with the Permit. The contractor shall perform all Permit modifications, documents, public notices, and public meetings required for the Closure of the HWMU and removal of the HWMU from the Permit. The government will lead coordination of all Permit modifications and stakeholder interactions and the contractor shall provide all technical, support personnel, documenting, research, and provide and pay for all meeting venues and notices.
Prepare an After Action Report (AAR) ESS for the HWMU as required by DoD 6055.9, Volume 7, Para V7.E4.7
The contractor shall prepare and implement a Work Plan to perform subsurface MEC and debris removal within the ‘inner fence’ inside Parcel 3 in accordance with (IAW) Permit sections IV.C and IV.F. The work plan shall incorporate all applicable elements of the NMED approved Final Work Plan Munitions and Explosives of Concern Removal and Surface Clearance Kickout Area dated February 6, 2015. A surface removal inside the inner fence will be done by others and is estimated to be completed by September 2016.
Prepare a Kick-Out Area Report summarizing the removal action IAW Permit section IV.D.
Prepare an After Action Report (AAR) ESS for the KOA as required by DoD 6055.9, Volume 7, Para V7.E4.7 Operate the Corrective Action Management Unit (CAMU) IAW the Permit especially section IX.
Implement the NMED approved Corrective Action Management Unit (CAMU) Closure Plan
(Attachment 9) in the Permit. The contractor shall prepare any and all amendments to the CAMU Closure Plan, if needed, as required by NMED.
Prepare a CAMU Closure Report in accordance with the Permit. The contractor shall perform all Permit modifications, documents, public notices, and public meetings required for the Closure of the CAMU and removal of the CAMU from the Permit. The government will lead coordination of all Permit modifications and stakeholder interactions and the contractor shall provide all technical, support personnel, documenting, research, and provide and pay for all meeting venues and notices.
Prepare an After Action Report (AAR) ESS for the CAMU as required by DoD 6055.9, Volume 7, Para V7.E4.7
The contractor shall prepare and implement a permittee-initiated interim measures soil removal work plan for any Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) or AOC associated with Parcel 3 in the Permit where soil exceeds cleanup levels. This includes Area of Concern (AOC) 92 which is approximately 20 acres. An RFI report for Parcel 3 AOCs and SWMUs will be completed by others in 2018 and will be provided by the Army upon completion. The contractor shall use this RFI in the development of the permittee-initiated interim measures work plan IAW Permit Section VII.G.3. The work plan shall be similar to those supplied as GFI and will describe all required efforts including sampling, testing, removal, disposal, backfill, site restoration activities. Soil removal quantities will be included in the bid schedule as options. The contractor shall prepare a completion report summarizing all activities of the removal actions IAW Permit Section VII.G.7.
The contractor shall perform all Permit modifications, documents, public notices, and public meetings required for removing all SWMUs and AOCs from the Permit. The government will lead coordination of all Permit modifications and stakeholder interactions and the contractor shall provide all technical, support personnel, documenting, research, and provide and pay for all meeting venues and notices.
3. General Conditions: The contractor shall use the Government furnished information as applicable. The Contractor shall follow section 5 of the latest version of NMED’s Risk Assessment Guidance for Investigations and Remediation for determining if cleanup levels of contaminates are exceeded. The Army Depot Manager will sign all waste shipping documentation as the generator. This information shall be included in work plans, as applicable, under this contract.
3.1 Borrow: The contractor shall be responsible for locating a source for borrow material.
Contractor shall provide the borrow location(s) in all Work Plans. Borrowed fill materials shall be from sources that do not have soil contaminant concentration levels exceeding FWDA’s cleanup levels. The contractor shall test borrow sources for the specific constituent list used for confirmation samples. There is a potential borrow source located within the boundaries of FWDA. It is the contractor’s responsibility for determining whether the source located on-post has sufficient volume to backfill an excavated area. The backfill shall be compacted as detailed in specific tasks to minimize settlement and graded to allow for drainage. No density measurements are needed. After the site(s) has been backfilled and graded to drain, the Contractor shall hydro-seed ALL disturbed areas (including staging areas and haul routes) with native vegetation with a 65% survival rate until FY 2024 A re-seeding plan shall be a part of the work plan.
3.2 Investigative Derived Waste (IDW) Management: The Contractor shall develop Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the management of FWDA IDW. A description of IDW management shall be included as an appendix to the body of work plans. The Contractor shall describe IDW Management and Disposal procedures only for the IDW that will be generated from the investigation activities described in the Work Plans. All cuttings shall be disposed by the contractor in accordance with (IAW) all local, state and federal regulations. Excess soil from surface sample locations, small diameter hand augers (<2”), and geoprobes can be reintroduced to their original extraction points. Deep geoprobe holes (10 feet or more) or holes that penetrate below the water table, shall be backfilled with bentonite to prevent caving. All waste containers shall be labeled IAW local, state, and federal regulations, including non-hazardous containers pending analysis. Labels shall be legible, with names and phone numbers of the contractor’s POC. Containers shall be covered and maintained (remove rain water, re-cover) while at FWDA.
All containers and waste shall be removed and properly disposed prior to contractor’s departure from FWDA. Additionally, all waste operations must be coordinated with the on-site Army.
3.3 Sample Identification: Sample ID’s shall consist of a combination of Parcel, AOC, Site identifier, source of sample, increment number for sub sample identification, type of sample, and matrix and shall be limited to 20 characters. Example sample ID’s are provided in the bidder package. The contractor shall coordinate with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Ft Worth District, on the sample ID’s prior to completion of work plans.
3.4 Chemical Analyses: Analyses methods and quality assurance program must generate data suitable for use in both Human Health Risk assessment (HHRA) and Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) for the parcel under this PWS.
Test Methods and Performance Standards: Chemical analytical tests shall conform to the site-specific Work Plan/ Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plan (UFP-QAPP) and the most current version of the Department of Defense Quality Systems Manual (DOD QSM). All methods must comply with USEPA SW-846 approved sampling methods following the Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods (USEPA 2007) to provide definitive level quantitative analytical data. All test methods must meet the reporting limit required by Human Health Risk assessment (HHRA) for soil and groundwater and Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) criteria for soil using USEPA SW-846 test methods producing the lowest reporting limits. The laboratory shall be certified for project analytical methods within 6 months of publication of any new method.
UFP-QAPP: The UFP-QAPP will include field QC, analytical methods, holding times, laboratory preparation methods and techniques, and quantitation limits for each parameter to be analyzed for the project such that data meet the performance standards for human health or ecological risk assessment, whichever is lower. The UFP-QAPP should follow the Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans, Final, Version 1, March 2005 using the optimized UFP-QAPP worksheets (or the most recently published version) and the most recent version of the DoD
QSM.
Laboratory Quality Control (QC): Systematic QC checks include replicates, standards, surrogates, or spiked samples and are incorporated into the analyses to show results remain reproducible and that the analytical method is actually measuring the quantity of target analytes without unacceptable bias. For each method performed, the lab shall maintain documentation that demonstrates the lab's performance of the method within sensitivity and precision/bias as stated in the published method to include a detection limit (DL) study for each matrix, determine an appropriate limit of quantitation (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) for each compound and matrix based upon the calculated DL, demonstrate precision and bias of the method by analyzing laboratory control samples and other QC check samples; and the laboratory shall have, in-house, the appropriate standards for all target analytes.
Analytical Deliverables: All laboratory analysis/reports shall be organized and submitted as a full data package in Adobe Acrobat format to include original completed COC. All electronic data submitted by the laboratory is required to be error-free using the latest version of the project specific automated data review (ADR) library (eQAPP) and the latest version of the ADR software. EDDs shall be verified to be in complete agreement with the hardcopy data reports.
The contract laboratory, at their cost, will correct any data errors in EDD files identified by the contractor. Results shall be submitted as an electronic data deliverable (EDD) in the Staged Electronic Data Delivery (SEDD) format. Results shall be subjected to 100% stage 2b validation which includes results, method, and instrument quality control data. Ten percent of the laboratory data packages shall be subjected to stage 3 validation. The stages of validation are defined in section 7.0 of the DoD QSM, v5.0, dated July 2013. The validation stage determines the type of data package required. Submission of the validated electronic output in SEDD format is required along with the eQAPP. The Contractor shall prepare a Data Quality Summary Report (DQSR) that discusses the quality of the data, its usability, flagged data, rejected data, and an overall assessment of the laboratory’s(s) performance. The DQSR shall be an appendix of the project reports under this PWS and shall be of sufficient quality to meet the requirements of the Permit.
Additionally, an appendix shall contain all laboratory data, specifically the Case Narratives, and the DQSR. All chemical data received from the laboratory shall be submitted to USACE, Fort Worth District for archiving. In addition, an excel file of the chemical data shall be provided by the contractor after data validation so the validation qualifiers are included along with the laboratory qualifiers. These data shall NOT be submitted on paper. All laboratory reports and data shall be submitted on disk and labeled such that the data are identifiable by the project.
3.5 Survey: Discrete sample locations, sample decision units and BIP locations shall be surveyed to within 1 foot. Soil volume surveys shall be to the nearest 0.1 foot horizontally and vertically. All survey coordinate data collected during the execution of the PWS shall be recorded in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) and State Plane, New Mexico West, formats, using the World Geodetic System (WGS) 84 and (North American Vertical Datum) NAVD 88 datum, in U.S feet for State Plane coordinates and meters for UTM coordinates. The contractor shall use a New Mexico State licensed surveyor. The contractor shall provide survey data to the government for verification of volumes for payment. All cubic yard quantities under this contract shall be bank cubic yards (as measured by survey in place).
3.6 Field Work Coordination: The Contractor shall inform the USACE COR and PM of upcoming field work 45 calendar days prior to field mobilization so the USACE can provide NMED their 30 day notice per the permit. In addition, through coordination with the USACE COR, the Contractor shall notify (by email) the BRAC Environmental Coordinator (BEC) and FWDA staff, 10 working days prior to mobilization to the site. A conference call between the Contractor and USACE shall be held to review all the sample quantities, locations, and test methods of sufficient sensitivity and rigor to meet human health and ecological risk screening values for this parcel well in advance of the field effort. All test methods must meet the reporting limit required by Human Health Risk assessment (HHRA) for soil and groundwater and Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) criteria for soil using USEPA SW-846 test methods producing the lowest reporting limits.
See section 3.4. Additionally, the Contractor shall submit Weekly and Monthly Reports per the
PMP.
The contractor will hold an on-site kick-off meeting(s) with the Army representatives (Project Delivery Team) prior to starting any field operations. The purpose of the meeting(s) will be to review all aspects of the upcoming work including lines of communication, access control, emergency response, health and safety procedures, traffic control, etc. All questions and concerns of the attendees will be satisfactorily addressed during or within 5 work days following the meeting(s). During the field effort at FWDA, the Contractor’s field leader shall coordinate daily with the FWDA Caretakers and on-site USACE representative. Coordination shall include a brief discussion on daily work, health/safety issues, if any, work progress, potential problems, deliveries, and any other job-related issues.
3.7 Utility Clearance: The Contractor shall be responsible for locating all utilities in the area.
Active utilities shall be avoided. If abandoned utilities are excavated during this work they shall be disposed along with the soil IAW landfill requirements and applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. The contractor shall coordinate with the FWDA BRAC Onsite Manager to locate utilities and provide utility maps. Before any excavation occurs, the Contractor shall have approval from the BRAC Onsite Manager, or his designee, and signed approval clearance documentation.
3.8 Cultural Resources: The Army, Navajo Nation, Pueblo of Zuni and the New Mexico State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) have entered into a “Programmatic Agreement” (PA) which addresses FWDA’s Section 106 Cultural requirements. Prior to initiating soil removal outside the HWMU boundary the Army will coordinate with the Tribes and SHPO as done in the past. See cultural files in bidder’s information. Avoidance of cultural sites is the first choice for all Permit actions. NMED understands the Tribal concerns for cultural sites and will work with the Army on locations of sampling and corrective actions under the FWDA RCRA Permit if needed.
The Contractor shall not disturb any suspected cultural resource, artifact, pottery shard, or ant hill (ant hills have cultural significance to the Pueblo Zuni) unless specifically given permission by the USACE Cultural POC. If cultural resources are encountered during the project, the Contractor shall immediately notify their USACE on site representative and follow the cultural resource management plan reporting protocols. USACE will notify the Army, and the Army will immediately notify the Tribal cultural points of contact for consultation per section 1.8 of the PA.
3.9 Government Furnished Equipment (GFE): USACE will (based on availability) issue a FWDA radio and work area keys to the Contractor’s field leader for use while on FWDA to communicate with Army and USACE personnel only. The Contractor shall supply their own internal communications capability. The Contractor shall return the government radio and keys to FWDA or Corps staff before demobilizing. The Contractor shall repair/ replace any GFE if it becomes damaged or broken while in the Contractor’s possession.
3.10 Cleanup Levels. Cleanup levels for soil shall be based on the lower of the human health, groundwater protection standard, and ecological risk based cleanup levels IAW Risk Assessment Guidance for Site Investigations and Remediation, current version. These cleanup levels are presently undergoing revisions which will not be completed until after proposals are submitted to the government. The contract will be modified to incorporate the new cleanup levels. Cleanup levels have been developed based on cleanup criteria as described in Attachment 7 of the FWDA RCRA permit.
The exception to the above is the screening level for arsenic. A site-specific concentration for arsenic shall be applied per directions described in NMED’s December 2013 arsenic assessment for arsenic levels. Current NMED FWDA cleanup levels shall be included in all tables in the Work Plan.
NMED has combined its remedial action guidance into a single document titled Risk Assessment Guidance for Site Investigations and Remediation which shall be used by the contractor.
Consistent with NMED risk assessment guidance, potential risks from individual contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) will be evaluated on a sample-by-sample basis by comparing the concentrations of detected compounds to the values provided in the most recent version of the guidance. Cumulative (additive) risks shall also be evaluated per NMED guidance and shall be evaluated by summing the risk ratios of detected compounds in a sample and comparing the sums to the appropriate target level as determined in the guidance. Risk ratios for carcinogenic compounds will be summed separately from the risk ratios of non-carcinogenic compounds. The Army will provide documents with additional guidance, example data table formats, and cumulative risk tables.
3.11 Material Documented as Safe (MDAS). Contractor shall inspect all MDAS and all MDAS shall be thermally flashed IAW HWMU Removal Work Plan 2013. The contractor shall maintain all MDAS under a chain-of-custody as described in EM 385-1-97 and shall certify and dispose of all MDAS IAW DoDI 4140.62, EM 385-1-97 and EM 200-1-15. Contractors shall use a qualified receiver IAW DoDI 4140.62 recycler that uses smelting as part of their recycling process. It is the contractor’s responsibility to obtain a qualified recycler. MDAS being transported to the recycler will be accompanied by a DD Form 1348-1A completed as described in EM 385-1-97 and a chain of custody form. Contractors shall be required to provide a letter of proof verifying that the MDAS was smelted along with a date and time. All documents will be given to the FWDA document repository and USACE PM and OESS for record keeping and incorporated into the Final Report as an attachment.
3.12 Document Versions. The Work Plan(s)/Report(s) shall be prepared in accordance with this PWS, and the FWDA RCRA Permit in Army Draft and Final versions. All required deliverables are listed under TABLE 2 – PERFORMANCE MILESTONES. A UFP-QAPP shall be prepared as an appendix to the Work Plan(s) under this PWS which contains a description of all requirements and procedures for analysis of soil, water, and investigative-derived waste (IDW), and will specify the DoD Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) accredited laboratory that will conduct the analysis. The UFP-QAPP will include requirements for quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC). The UFP-QAPP will also include analytical methods, holding times, laboratory preparation methods and techniques, and quantitation limits for each parameter to be analyzed for the project such that data meet the performance standards for human health or ecological risk assessment, whichever is lower (Section 3.4). The UFP-QAPP should follow the Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans, Final, Version 1, March 2005 using the optimized UFP-QAPP worksheets (or the most recently published version) and the most recent version of the DoD QSM.
The Work Plan(s)/UFP-QAPP shall specify that laboratory services be provided by laboratories that are DoD ELAP accredited for the methods required under this PWS. In addition to DoD ELAP accreditation, the laboratory shall hold current accreditation for all appropriate fields-of-testing in the State of New Mexico. Proof of current accreditation / certification for the applicable fields-of-testing is required prior to the laboratory acceptance of any samples for the project. The contractor will assume a 30-day turn-around-time for all analytical data. If there is the potential for limited analytical capability of performing all the requested analyses, subcontracting to another certified laboratory is permitted. Before performing environmental testing for USACE, the laboratory shall have access to the approved UFP-QAPP.
All documents shall meet the latest version of the FWDA Document Format Guidelines, a copy of which will be provided to the contractor. If a discrepancy exists between the latest version of the FWDA Document Format Guidelines and NMED requests, then NMED requests supersede the guidelines. Documents shall be written from the perspective of the Army writing to the stakeholders and not the Contractor writing to the Army. The Permit is the critical guidance under this project. Contractors shall abide by the most recent RCRA Permit and applicable Sections.
The Final versions will be reviewed concurrently by both the Pueblo of Zuni and the Navajo Nation representatives, and New Mexico Environmental Department (NMED). Based on the comments and direction from the COR, the Contractor shall prepare a Revised Final Work Plan and any subsequent versions. The Tribes have 60 calendar days review period for work plans and 90 calendar days for reports. NMED typically has much longer review times for work plans and reports. Please note that the Army is unable to commit to review times for another Agency.
However, historical NMED Regulatory review times have ranged from 90 calendar days for low complexity documents and 120 – 180 calendar days for higher complexity documents. Therefore, contractors should review available information and form their own independent conclusions as to the time necessary, as well as risks and appropriate mitigation and contingency measures, to achieve the proposed performance and schedule objectives with their technical approach. Each version of the documents will be reviewed and accepted by the Army prior to proceeding to the next version. The Contractor shall prepare written responses to address comments received from the Army reviewers. The Army will have up to 30 day review of each version. Once accepted/approved, the Contractor shall make changes and submit the corrected version of the documents. The Final version requires NMED approval. The format of the document(s) shall follow the FWDA Document Format Guidance (including Section 508 compliance) that will be provided to the contractor as part of the GFI package prior to bidding. Section 508 compliance is only required for Final documents. The Draft and Final versions of the Work Plan(s)/Report(s) shall include a page with a Permittee Signature Block to comply with permit section I.I.9.g.
3.13 Supplies, Deliveries, and Office: The Contractor shall supply their own office space, restrooms, tap water, waste disposal from office, electricity (power lines are only located in the admin area), drinking water, storage, telephone, fax, and internet communication on post.
There are no utilities in Parcel 3. The contractor shall coordinate with Army personnel in locating storage and trailer locations. A siting plan consisting of map showing approximate location of temporary office(s), photographs or renderings of all sides of the proposed office(s) and a floor-plan with square footage along with a short narrative describing purpose of temporary office space hall be provided 60 calendar days prior to proposed delivery of office unit(s). Contractor’s siting plan will be submitted by the COR to Garrison Command, White Sands Missile Range, for acceptance.
The FedEx address to use for your deliveries is:
Fort Wingate Army Depot 7 miles East of Gallup, NM
USACE Site Trailer Fort Wingate, NM 87316
3.14 Points of Contact (POC):
Contract Specialist: Brenda Anderson, Office: 918-669-7274 Fax: 918-669-7495
Other pertinent POCs will be identified during development of the Contractor’s Project Management Plan/Work Plan.
4. Description of Services: The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, Permits including permits required to comply with Clean Water Act requirements, and other items and non-personal services necessary to perform the work as defined in this Performance Work Statement (PWS) except for those items specified as Government furnished property and services. The Contractor will conduct all land surveys using a New Mexico State licensed surveyor (surveying boundaries, grid stakes, field surveys, etc.). The Contractor shall perform to the standards in this contract.
The Contractor shall perform all work in compliance with the current version of the RCRA Permit EPA ID No. NM 6213820974 (Permit) for FWDA.
5. Tribal Coordination: In each of the Work Plan(s) discussed throughout this PWS, the contractor shall include the methods of cultural resource monitoring in conjunction with the Zuni and Navajo Cultural Resource experts in accordance with the Programmatic Agreement. The Contractor shall coordinate with and contract with as necessary the Zuni Tribe and the Navajo Historic Preservation Office for all cultural monitoring. The contractor shall provide a cultural resource management plan (CRMP) that includes but is not limited to reporting and recordation of human remains and inadvertently discovered archeological sites (prehistoric and historic) and completion of all required documentation per the USACE cultural resource POC. The contractor is encouraged to contact the Zuni Cultural Resource Enterprise at https://www.zuniculturalresourceenterprise.com/ and phone numbers: (505) 782-4814 or (505) 782-5558.
Also contact the Navajo Historic Preservation Department at (928) 871-7198.
If cultural resources are encountered during the project, the contractor shall immediately notify the USACE on site representative and follow the cultural resource management plan reporting protocols.
The Army will immediately notify the Tribal cultural points of contact for consultation per section 1.8 of the PA. As stated in Section 1.4 of the PA, avoidance of historic properties and potential Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) cultural items will be the first choice for FWDA RCRA permit activities. Electronic files showing cultural sites will be provided by the COR to the contractor. The files shall be used on a ‘need to know basis’ and not be made available to the public. All associated files shall be destroyed upon project completion.
6. Scope:
Task 1 – Project Management: The contractor shall provide Contract Management for the overall effort and scope involved with this Contract. The contractor shall provide Contract management including prime and subcontract support as required, internal project controls and Quality Control (QC), status reports on work being performed under this contract, invoicing and pay requests, and other coordination and personnel support for the individuals assigned to this contract. A contract project manager will be designated by the Contractor as the POC for all support under this Contract.
Project Kick-Off Meeting (DELIVERABLE) The Contractor shall participate in a kick off meeting at Fort Wingate Depot Activity, New Mexico within 21 calendar days of contract award. The Contractor shall prepare meeting minutes and provide them to all meeting participants within seven business days of the kick off meeting. All contractor key personnel will attend this meeting (See Section 8.10).
Project Management Plan (DELIVERABLE) The Contractor shall prepare and maintain a Project Management Plan (PMP) that is based on the Contractor’s proposal that at a minimum includes technical approach, management organization and integration of the contractor’s project team, their responsibilities and authorities, schedule and schedule management, transitional activities (if any), risk management, milestone payment schedule (MPS), Sub-CLIN management, quality management, health and safety management, project communications and stakeholders, and security management. In addition, access procedures and Points of Contact (POCs) for FWDA shall be included in the PMP.
Considering the level of project complexity and importance of all communications, The PMP shall also present a detailed discussion of lines of communication. The contractor shall coordinate and receive approval from the Army prior to communicating with regulatory and tribal stakeholders (NMED, tribes, EPA, etc.) with the exception of the Contractors’ tribal subcontractors and emergency response agencies during an incident. All written correspondence (except for email) from the Army to any stakeholder will be signed by an Army representative unless otherwise directed. For other communications, the Contractor shall coordinate with the USACE COR or the QAR (Quality Assurance Representative). The USACE COR or QAR will direct the Contractor on communications with upper level management such as the BEC, PM or PgM. If conference calls are required to adequately address concerns, issues, and/or questions, the Contractor shall be responsible for setting up conference call lines. Contractual issues will be directed to the USACE COR or contracting officer (KO). In some cases, the contractor is allowed to communicate directly with the FWDA Manager. Such cases include the entrance and exit of security gates, and other issues directly related to the security of FWDA.
As part of the PMP, the Contractor shall, 1) develop and maintain a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). The Contractor shall submit a WBS in the PMP. The WBS shall be prepared in hard copy and electronic copy in Microsoft Project version 2007 or 2010. The WBS shall be provided to USACE monthly and upon request, and updated as required. The WBS shall include 100% of the work defined by this PWS and capture all deliverables, and cost associated with each deliverable and 2) the PMP shall describe the process by which the contractor will deliver weekly and monthly progress reports. Weekly and monthly progress report shall be submitted during all fieldwork activities. During no fieldwork, or during demobilizations, the contractor shall submit monthly progress reports.
The WBS shall fully support the technical approach and outlines activities and milestones defined at the appropriate level of detail; logically sequenced to support and manage completion of the performance objectives in the PWS and which allows for sufficient review time of deliverables.
Additionally, the due dates for all payable deliverables shall be identified. Activities identified in the respective QASPs should be appropriately coded to allow for planning of QA inspections. The Army will make all payments after verification of milestone completion in accordance with the approved MPS. Invoices for the work performed shall be in accordance with the activities and milestones as approved in the schedule submittal described above. Contractor will submit monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation no later than the 10th day of each month. Partial or bi-monthly invoicing is not allowed. All performance objectives must be completed within the allowable period of performance for the contract. The Contractor shall need to take into account the existing or future schedules developed under the applicable objectives listed in Section 1.0 of this PWS. The Contractor shall also need to coordinate activities with the COR to ensure that the proposed project task schedules do not conflict with other contractor activities on site, or interrupt other environmental restoration activities.
The PMP shall be submitted to the COR, and as shown in the submittal schedule as draft. The Army will review and comment on the document. All comments shall be addressed. Once the contractor has addressed comments, the Contractor shall submit the Final PMP.
Project Milestones (Part of the PMP deliverable) The Contractor shall propose pricing for the performance milestones presented in Table 2 - Performance Milestones on the following page within Schedule B of the solicitation package. The Contractor may propose interim milestones to the Major Milestones presented in Table 2. Interim milestones will only be accepted if they represent significant progress toward milestone completion, and completion of these interim steps can be measured and demonstrated. Payments will be tied to the successful completion of the following milestones or an interim milestone plan approved by the Army, through the COR. To that end, all proposed interim milestones should be associated with required deliverables. All milestones must have a defined means for demonstrating completion in order to facilitate certification and approval. Days shall be calendar days unless noted otherwise.
TABLE 2 -PERFORMANCE MILESTONES
TABLE 2 - PERFORMANCE MILESTONES
CLIN Milestone Task
Performance Acceptance Standards and Approval
Authority
Deliverable
TASK 1
0001 Project Kick-Off Meeting at FWDA within 21 days of contract award
Government
Project Kick-off Meeting Minutes
0002 Consolidated PMP for Parcel 3.
Draft PMP within 30 calendar days of Project Kick-Off meeting, Army review within 30 calendar days of after receipt of Draft Final PMP within 30 calendar days of receipt of Army comments on the drafts
Government Final PMP
0003 Accident Prevention Plan for Parcel 3.
Draft Plans within 30 calendar days from date of award, Army review within 30 calendar days of after receipt of Draft Final Plans within 30 calendar days of receipt of Army comments on the drafts.
Government Final Accident and Prevention Plan
0004 Waste Management Plan for Parcel 3.
Draft Plans within 30 calendar days from date of award, Army review within 30 calendar days of after receipt of Draft Final Plans within 30 calendar days of receipt of Army comments on the drafts.
Government Final WMP
0005 Deviation Approval and Risk Acceptance Document (DARAD) DA Form 7632 for Parcel 3.
Draft Plans within 30 calendar days from date of award, Army review within 30 calendar days of after receipt of Draft
Final Plans within 30 calendar days of receipt of Army comments on the drafts.
Government Final DARAD
Authority
Deliverable
0006 Environmental Protection Plan for Parcel 3 Draft Plans within 60 calendar days from date of award, Army review within 30 calendar days of after receipt of Draft Final Plans within 30 calendar days of receipt of Army comments on the drafts.
Government Final EPP
0007 Hazardous Waste Management…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .