W912BU-10-T-0027.pdf

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, PHILADELPHIA

CONTRACTING DIVISION

WANAMAKER BUILDING

100 PENN SQUARE EAST

PHILADELPHIA PA 19107-3390

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

11. DELIVERY FOR FOB

RFQ

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

IFB RFP

CODE

SEE ADDENDUM

BLOCK IS MARKED

DESTINATION UNLESS

12. DISCOUNT TERMS

(No Collect Calls)

13b. RATING

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

X

CODE

W912BU-10-T-0027 15-Mar-2010

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

215-656-6786

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

03:00 PM 16 Apr 2010

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER) 31c. DATE SIGNED

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

22. UNIT 23. UNIT PRICE 24. AMOUNT21. QUANTITY

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

UNRESTRICTED

FAX: NAICS:

TEL:

CODE 18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYOFFEROR

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TEL.

W912BU

SIZE STD:

9. ISSUED BY

FACILITY

CODE

17a.CONTRACTOR/

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

15. DELIVER TO CODE E570000 16. ADMINISTERED BY

LOGISTICS MGMT OFFICE

USAED, PHILA DISTRICT WANAMAKER BUILDING

PHILADELPHIA PA 19107-3390

TEL: FAX:

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

EDWARD A BODDIE

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

0 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

SEE SCHEDULE

335314

TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND DELIVER ALL ITEMS

SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY ADDITIONAL SHEETS

SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED HEREIN.

SB

HUBZONE SB

SET ASIDE: 100 % FOR

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

W25PHS00689018

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

TEL: EMAIL:

3 COPIES

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

.OFFER DATED YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN 29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REFERENCE

X

8(A)

SVC-DISABLED VET-OWNED SB

EMERGING SB

X

X

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

SEE SCHEDULE

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES 21. QUANTITY 22. UNIT 24. AMOUNT

PAGE 2 OF

23. UNIT PRICE

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005) BACK

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

W912BU-10-T-0027

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Lump Sum

DREDGE EQUIPMENT IMPROVEMENTS

FFP

DREDGE EQUIPMENT IMPROVEMENTS - MDC 2802-0009: The contractor will provide new electrical equipment relating to the dredging systems aboard the Dredge McFarland as detailed in the attached statement of work. The Contractor shall provide a complete and functional system as described by the Contract Drawings. Period Of Performance: As stated in the statment of work.

FOB: Destination

MILSTRIP: W25PHS00689018

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: W25PHS00689018

NET AMT

LINE ITEMS

Provide and install equipment related to the acquisition of the following for the DREDGE MCFARLAND

CLIN SUPPLIES/SERVICES QNTY U/I U/I

PRICE

AMOUNT

0001 DREDGE EQUIPMENT IMPROVEMENTS -

MDC 2802-0009: The contractor will provide new electrical equipment relating to the dredging systems aboard the Dredge McFarland as detailed in the attached statement of work. The Contractor shall provide a complete and functional system as described by the Contract Drawings. Period Of Performance: As stated in the statment of work.

0001AA Dragarm Hoist System MDC 2802-0009 MCFARLAND DREDGE ELECTRICAL The Contractor shall provide and install two (2) dragarm hoist systems as described in the detailed designs contained in the Contract Drawings in the this solicitation. The Contractor shall build, test, deliver, install, and commission the system aboard the Dredge McFarland in accordance with the statement of work. The Government will be provide support to rig the equipment into the vessel, weld foundations, mount the equipment, and pull cabling as required.

2 SYSTEMS

AMOUNT

0001AB Uninterruptable Power Supply Cabinets MDC

2802-0009 MCFARLAND DREDGE

ELECTRICAL The Contractor shall provide Uninterruptable Power Supply Cabinets as described in the detailed designs contained in the Contract Drawings in the this solicitation. The Contractor shall build, test, deliver, install, and commission the system aboard the Dredge McFarland in accordance with the statement of work. The Government will be provide support to rig the equipment into the vessel, weld foundations, mount the equipment, and pull cabling as required.

1 JOB

0001AC Local Engine Panels MDC 2802-0009 MCFARLAND DREDGE ELECTRICAL The Contractor shall provide and install three (3) local engine panels as described in the detailed designs contained in the Contract Drawings in the this solicitation. The Contractor shall build, test, deliver, install, and commission the system aboard the Dredge McFarland in accordance with the statement of work. The Government will be provide support to rig the equipment into the vessel, weld foundations, mount the equipment, and pull cabling as required.

3 PANELS

0001AD Dredge Generator and Pump Controls MDC

2802-0009 MCFARLAND DREDGE

ELECTRICAL The Contractor shall provide and dredge generator and pump controls as described in the detailed designs contained in the Contract Drawings in the this solicitation. The Contractor shall build, test, deliver, install, and commission the system aboard the Dredge McFarland in accordance with the statement of work. The Government will be provide support to rig the equipment into the vessel, weld foundations, mount the equipment, and pull cabling as required.

1 JOB

0001AE Supervisory System (SCADA) MDC 2802-0009 MCFARLAND DREDGE ELECTRICAL The Contractor shall provide Supervisory System as described in the detailed designs contained in the Contract Drawings in the this solicitation. The Contractor shall build, test, deliver, install, and commission the system aboard the Dredge McFarland in accordance with the statement of work. The Government will be provide support to rig the equipment into the vessel, weld foundations, mount the equipment, and pull cabling as required.

1 JOB

AMOUNT

TOTAL VS

INSERT ADDRESS OF THE LOCATION WHERE THE WORK WILL BE PERFORMED:

The Government may reject an offer as non-responsive if it is materially and mathematically unbalanced as to price for any offered item or combination of offered items. An offer is unbalanced when it is based on prices significantly less than cost for some work and prices, which are significantly overstated for other work.

STATEMENT OF WORK

1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Marine Design Center (MDC) of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has issued this Request for Quotation to acquire new electrical equipment relating to the dredging systems aboard the Dredge McFarland. The Dredge McFarland is a 300’ long seagoing hopper dredge owned by the USACE Philadelphia District. The McFarland was built in 1967 and much of the electrical equipment is original. Over the years the condition of the equipment has deteriorated significantly and much of it needs to be replaced.

Each of the dredge’s two drag-arms is maneuvered by a hoist system comprised of three winches. Each set of three winches is driven by a common shaft connected to a single electric motor. The winches can be clutched and declutched from the shaft and the speed of the motor varied to give the operator complete control of each dragarm. This arrangement is shown on Reference Drawing 9-7-1191. The primary control station for each dragarm is the drag tender station just aft of the navigation bridge; one on each side. This Solicitation is for two complete winch hoist systems including motors, variable frequency drives, local control stations, drag tender control stations, and sensors. The shafts and winches themselves will be retained. The motors and drives provided shall be certificated by the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS).

The drag tender control stations shall also provide remote control of the dredge pumps so that speed may be adjusted remotely during the dredging operation.

The McFarland’s two dredge pumps are driven by two Westinghouse DC motors through two silicon controlled rectifiers (SCR). AC power to the rectifiers is supplied from a combination of three (3) ALCO diesel generator sets. The starboard generator can only run the starboard pump, the port generator can only run the port pump, and the center generator can run either pump. At any given time one generator is driving one pump, paralleling generators is not possible. The existing SCR will be retained. New bus work and four (4) new circuit breakers will be provided and installed by others. The Contractor shall provide 5 control sections: two (2) for the dredge pump motors and three (3) for the dredge generators to be located on the switchboard flat in place of the existing control cabinets. The generator control sections will also manage the four

(4) dredge circuit breakers described above and shown on Reference Drawing xxxx.

Additionally, the Contractor shall supply three (3) local engine control panels which will be located in the engine room and will interface with the engine’s existing Woodward governors mounted on the engines. These local engine panels will also communicate with the voltage regulators contained in the generator control sections of the switchgear described above.

In situations where dredged material is pumped ashore, the dredge pumps are controlled from a pump-out room on the main deck. This room has controls to allow for valve lineup and pump operation. The Contractor shall provide a new console for the pump-out room that will provide for remote operation of the dredge pumps as well as the jetting pumps.

The control power for the above equipment is provided through a redundant power scheme backed up by several uninterruptable power supplies (UPS). The Contractor shall provide a lineup of five (5) cabinets containing the various UPS’s, power converters, and DC distribution hardware as shown on the Contract Drawings. These cabinets will power the Contractor provided equipment as well as equipment provided by others.

The Government is providing a detailed design for all equipment described in this solicitation.

The detailed design is included as a series of Contract Drawings which are described in Section

3. The Contractor shall build, test, deliver, install, and commission the system aboard the Dredge McFarland. Support will be provided to the Contractor to rig the equipment into the vessel, weld foundations, mount the equipment, and pull cabling as required. The Contractor shall also provide the sensors described in Contract Drawing 333-F490-01 LIST OF SENSORS.

In order to minimize dredge downtime, the installation of all equipment will occur during the vessel’s maintenance period August 1, 2010 to October 31, 2010. Delivery of all equipment shall be no later than August 1, 2010 to the location specified in Section 10. This time will allow for the equipment to be rigged into the vessel and mounted so that the Contractor may begin wiring in mid August.

2 DESIGN STANDARDS

All designs, systems, and components shall meet the latest requirements of the following references:

- 46 CFR Parts, Subchapters I – Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels & J – Electrical Engineering

- American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), ‘Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels’

- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Std 45, ‘Recommended Practice for Electrical Installation on Shipboard’

- National Electric Code (NEC)

- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, EM-385-1-1, ‘Safety and Health Requirements Manual’

3 DRAWINGS

A. CONTRACT DRAWINGS - Drawings that, along with the specification, fully define the scope of work. All work shall be in accordance with the Contract Drawings listed below. The Contract Drawings and the specifications shall be considered as mutually explanatory and supplementary, and any feature shown by one and not the other shall have the same force and effect as if shown by both.

333-F040-01 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

333-F255-01 DREDGE TENDER CONSOLE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT

333-F506- DREDGE SYSTEM

o 03 DREDGE GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL o 04 PORT MOTOR CONTROL PANEL o 05 STBD MOTOR CONTROL PANEL o 06 CONTROL FLOW LOGIC DIAGRAM o 07 DREDGE PUMPOUT CONTROL STATION o 08 DREDGE PUMP TENDER CONTROL STATION

333-F510 DRAGARM HOIST SYSTEM

o 01 DRAGARM HOIST ONE-LINE DIAGRAM o 02 DRAGARM DRIVE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT o 03 DRAGARM HOIST LOCAL CONTROL PANEL o 04 DRAGARM HOIST TENDER CONTROL STATION

333-F735-01 LOCAL ENGINE PANELS

333-F780 SUPERVISORY SYSTEM (SCADA)

o 01 DRAGARM HOIST SCADA SYSTEM o 02 DRAGARM HOIST CONTROL FLOW LOGIC DIAGRAM

333-F798-01 UNITERUPTABLE POWER SUPPLIES (UPS)

B. REFERENCE DRAWINGS - The Reference Drawings listed below show the arrangement and details of the vessel as originally constructed and, to a limited extent, as modified over the years, but do not necessarily reflect with total accuracy the present existing conditions. They are furnished for correlative information only. The Government assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the reference drawings, and all work shall be measured or templated from the ship.

9-7-229 OUTBOARD AND INBOARD PROFILE

9-7-230 ARRANGEMENT OF HOLD AND MAIN DECK

9-7-231 ARRANGEMENT OF UPPER DECK FORECASTLE DECK

AND BOAT DECK

9-7-232 ARRANGEMENT OF BRIDGE DECK AND ABOVE

9-7-536 ARRANGEMENT OF DRAGTENDERS HOUSE

9-7-1112A ARRANGEMENT OF DRAGHEAD DAVIT

9-7-1114 ARRANGEMENT OF TRUNNION DAVIT

9-7-1173 DRAGARM HOISTING LAYOUT

9-7-1191 ARRANGEMENT OF DRAG PIPE WINCHES

9-7-1211 SCHEMATIC HYDRAULIC PIPING OF CLUTCH AND

BRAKE CONTROL FOR DRAG PIPE WINCHES

333-F720 ONE LINE DIAGRAMS

4 PRE-QUOTATION VESSEL INSPECTIONS

A pre-quotation inspection will be held to allow all prospective Offerors to inspect the vessel.

The inspection will assist the Offerors with assessing the scope of the job. In addition, it will allow Offerors to gauge the general condition of the vessel. While attendance is not mandatory, it is strongly recommended that prospective Offerors inspect the vessel.

A. LOCATION, DATE AND POINT OF CONTACT

The pre-quotation inspection will be held on March 19, 2010 from 8:00 am to 4:00 pm at Fort Mifflin; Philadelphia, PA. Representatives of prospective Offerors wishing to attend should contact Ian Enterline at (215) 656-6160 for the specifics of the exact location.

B. PRE-INSPECTION QUESTIONS

Prior to the pre-quotation inspection, Offerors may discover items in the plans and specifications which they believe require technical clarification or interpretation. Questions of this nature should be submitted in writing to the designated Government representative for response.

Questions that are submitted far enough in advance of the inspection to allow evaluation will be answered at the post-inspection meeting. In all cases, a copy of both questions and answers will be forwarded to all prospective Offerors after Government analysis.

C. PRE-QUOTATION INSPECTION

During the pre-quotation inspection, Offerors will be allowed unencumbered access throughout the entire vessel. Representatives of the Government will be available, but only to the extent necessary to escort Offerors and assist with access. Government Representatives on the vessel will not discuss the scope of the work or make any technical clarifications or interpretations.

D. POST-INSPECTION MEETING

After the inspection, a meeting will be held with all participants to allow for the presentation of any newly discovered questions. This meeting is not for the purpose of educating Offerors that have not carefully reviewed the plans and specifications and have come unprepared. Questions will not be answered at that time, but will be acknowledged and recorded. The Government will prepare answers to all questions and forward a copy of both the questions and answers to all prospective Offerors.

5 CONDITION OF EQUIPMENT

All materials and equipment furnished shall be new, unused, and free from defects or imperfections that might affect the serviceability of the finished product.

All equipment shall be suitable for a marine environment and capable of withstanding the unique operation conditions of a seagoing hopper dredge.

All equipment shall be calibrated prior to final acceptance by the Corps of Engineers.

Calibration should be capable of being achieved by the crew, in the future when necessary, using procedures described in the documentation provided by the manufacturer.

6 SCOPE OF WORK

The Contractor shall provide a complete and functional system as described by the Contract Drawings. The Contract Drawings call out specific manufacturers for many of the components in the system. Should the Contractor propose to provide similar components from another manufacturer, the Contractor shall bear full responsibility for all additional costs associated with the substitution. This includes but is not limited to additional engineering, materials, and labor required to integrate the substituted components into the system. Substitutions shall provide the same form, fit, function, and quality as the components specified. The degree to which a Contractor’s proposed system meets the requirements of this Solicitation will be weighed against price as part of the best-value procurement process.

A. FEATURES

The equipment provided shall provide all features described in the Contract Drawing 333-F040-

01 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.

The Contract Drawings show a SIEMENS brand variable frequency drive (VFD). The various drive cabinets have been carefully selected and arranged so as to fit in the existing winch rooms.

The design minimizes interference with existing piping, cabling, and equipment and has been refined based on multiple ship checks. The Contractor shall ensure that, regardless of the brand of VFD provided, all drive related equipment fits within the envelope of the cabinets shown on the Contract Drawings.

B. ENGINEERING

The Solicitation provides some flexibility in how the Contractor implements the Contract Design. The Contractor may propose to use a distributed I/O system with strategically placed subpanels to reduce wiring and ease in troubleshooting. The Contract Drawings show all sensor wires terminating in the local drive control cabinet, which is also an acceptable solution.

Designs that are robust, allow for easy maintenance and troubleshooting, and minimize the amount of installation support labor will be considered more desirable to the Government.

C. INSTALLATION

The installation of equipment will occur in an east coast shipyard to be determined later. It is the intent of the Government to handle all rigging, welding, mounting, and cabling under its contract with the shipyard. For all equipment, the Contractor shall provide arrangement drawings, foundation drawings, rigging procedures, cable collar locations, weights (with COGs) and overall dimensions, and cabling diagrams within 60 days of Contract award so that the Government may describe the support labor required.

Sensors to be installed on legacy equipment shall be provided by the Contractor but will be installed in the field by the Government. The Contractor will terminate sensor wiring after the cabling has been pulled. The sensors to be provided are described in Contract Drawing 333-

F490-01 LIST OF SENSORS.

Once all equipment is in place and cables have been pulled to the specified locations, the Contractor shall terminate and label wiring, commission, and fully test all the equipment.

7 TESTING

This Solicitation requires commissioning and two levels of testing: A Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) and a Site Acceptance Test (SAT). The Contractor shall demonstrate effective operation of as much equipment as possible at the factory acceptance test.

The Contractor shall commission and fully test the installed system on site. Representatives of USACE and US Coast Guard (USCG) will be onsite to witness the testing. Support from USACE will be provided during this phase of the project to start and stop equipment as necessary to verify proper operation of the provided systems.

Due to the nature of the system being provided, not all equipment can be tested dockside. The Government will hold a sea-trial for the purpose of testing the equipment in an operational scenario. The Contractor shall perform during sea-trials all testing that can not be performed dockside. The Contractor shall develop a comprehensive testing plan with procedures for all tests to be performed. The plan shall also indicate which tests will be performed at the factory, which will be performed dockside, and which will be performed at sea trials. The Contractor shall submit the testing plan to MDC for approval at least 15 days prior to the start of factory acceptance testing.

All equipment shall be fully tested to demonstrate the proper operation of all functions and features including safety devices and interlocks. Additional system specific testing requirements are included in Contract Drawing 333-F040-01 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.

8 DOCUMENTATION

Thirty (30) days prior to delivery, the following deliverables shall be provided to MDC for review and approval:

System wiring diagram showing point to point wiring between all major components, sensors, controls, and power. Physical drawings (3 copies) should be submitted as well as electronic drawings in AutoCAD format.

Complete operator and maintenance manuals (5 copies), complete with technical data, brochures, and drawings necessary for operating the drag-arms with the upgraded system and for maintaining the current USCG certificate of inspection (COI). Electronic copies shall also be provided

Terminal point index listing all I/O points, where the sensor wires are terminated, and the drawing and sheet number of the appropriate wiring diagram. Hard copies (3 copies) shall be provided as well as an electronic copy in Microsoft Excel format.

Complete bill of materials for the system and list of recommended spare parts.

Design Verification Test Procedure (DVTP), Periodical Safety Test Procedure

(PSTP), and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to meet the requirements of

46 CFR 62.

The Contractor shall submit the above documents to USCG Marine Safety Center for approval and perform the required tests in the presence of a USCG representative during the Site Acceptance Test (SAT).

9 TRAINING

The Contractor shall provide training as described in the Contract Drawing 333-F040-01 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. The instructors shall be native English speakers with a minimum of 10 years experience in shipboard automation and have expertise in the operational as well as technical workings of the system. The training shall include any software or special tools needed to maintain, test, modify, or troubleshoot the system.

11 RIDE ALONG

The Contractor shall provide the services of a factory technician to remain on the McFarland for five (5) days upon return to service. The technician shall have the tools and knowledge to fix any problems that may arise when the system is put into service for the first time.

12 WARRANTY

The Contractor shall provide a warranty on the winch hoist system for a minimum of one year after Final Acceptance. The warranty shall cover parts and labor as needed to remedy any failure of the winch hoist system within the warranty period.

Additionally, the Contractor shall assign, in writing, all commercial warranties for equipment provided under this contract to the Government. The effective date of all commercial warranties shall be the date of Final Acceptance.

13 SPARE PARTS

The contractor shall provide a recommended list of spare parts. The Government may procure spares from this list by issuing a contract modification.

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

G1 GOVERNMENT POINTS OF CONTACT

a. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICE:

U.S. Army Engineer District, Philadelphia, Attn: CENAP-CT-S (Edward A. Boddie), Wanamaker Building, Room 643, 100 Penn Square East, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-3390 Telephone: (215) 656-6786 Facsimile: (215) 656-6798 or 6780

b. GENERAL POINT OF CONTACT – TECHNICAL EXECUTION:

Marine Design Center, Corps of Engineers ATTN: Michael Kelley, PM MDC Project #2802-0007 Dwg MCFARLAND Wannamaker Bldg, 100 Penn Square East Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 Telephone: (215) 656-6170

G2 INVOICE SUBMISSION:

a. Invoices Must Contain The Following Information Or They Will Be Returned:

i. Company Name, Payment Address

ii. Invoice Number, Date, and Contract Number

iii. Tax ID Number,

iv. Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT) Information.

v. Point of contact with name and telephone number

b. SEND THE INVOICE TO BILLING OFFICE: Marine Design Center Physical Support Branch is the “designated billing office” for this action. Invoices must be properly received before payment will be made.

Marine Design Center, Corps of Engineers ATTN: Michael Kelley, PM MDC Project #2802-0007 Dwg MCFARLAND Wannamaker Bldg, 100 Penn Square East Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 Telephone: (215) 656-6165

d. An electronic copy of the invoice may also be sent to: Edward.a.Boddie@usace.army.mil

G3 Allowable Travel Cost:

a. FAR 31.205-46 addresses allowability of travel related expenses.

i. Information on per diem rates can be found at:

http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentType=GSA_BASIC&contentId=17943

4 CONTRACTOR’S POINTS OF CONTACT: The contractor/offeror must complete the following information:

a. The contractor’s contract primary point of contact info is (administrative functions will be performed at the following address/office):

POC NAME: ____________________________________________

CONTRACTOR: ____________________________________________

ADDRESS: ____________________________________________

Business: _________________________________________ Cell: _________________________________________ Fax: _________________________________________ Email: _________________________________________

b. GENERAL INFO

CEC/DUNS: _________________________________

CAGE: _________________________________

TAX ID: _________________________________

TABLE OF ATTACHMENTS

DOCUMENT # DRWNG TYPE DESCRIPTION

Attachment 1 Contract 333-F040-01 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Attachment 2 Contract 333-F255-01 DREDGE TENDER CONSOLE GENERAL

ARRANGEMENT

Attachment 3 Contract 333-F506- DREDGE SYSTEM Attachment 4 Contract 03 DREDGE GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL Attachment 5 Contract 04 PORT MOTOR CONTROL PANEL Attachment 6 Contract 05 STBD MOTOR CONTROL PANEL Attachment 7 Contract 06 CONTROL FLOW LOGIC DIAGRAM Attachment 8 Contract 07 DREDGE PUMPOUT CONTROL STATION Attachment 9 Contract 08 DREDGE PUMP TENDER CONTROL STATION

Attachment 10 Contract 333-F510 DRAGARM HOIST SYSTEM Attachment 11 Contract 01 DRAGARM HOIST ONE-LINE DIAGRAM Attachment 12 Contract 02 DRAGARM DRIVE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT Attachment 13 Contract 03 DRAGARM HOIST LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Attachment 14 Contract 04 DRAGARM HOIST TENDER CONTROL STATION Attachment 15 Contract 333-F735-01 LOCAL ENGINE PANELS Attachment 16 Contract 333-F780 SUPERVISORY SYSTEM (SCADA) Attachment 17 Contract 01 DRAGARM HOIST SCADA SYSTEM Attachment 18 Contract 02 DRAGARM HOIST CONTROL FLOW LOGIC DIAGRAM Attachment 19 Contract 333-F798-01 UNITERUPTABLE POWER SUPPLIES (UPS) Attachment 20 Contract 333-F490-01 LIST OF SENSORS Attachment 21 Reference 9-7-229 OUTBOARD AND INBOARD PROFILE Attachment 22 Reference 9-7-230 ARRANGEMENT OF HOLD AND MAIN DECK

TABLE OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 23 Reference 9-7-231 ARRANGEMENT OF UPPER DECK FORECASTLE DECK

AND BOAT DECK

Attachment 24 Reference 9-7-232 ARRANGEMENT OF BRIDGE DECK AND ABOVE Attachment 25 Reference 9-7-536 ARRANGEMENT OF DRAGTENDERS HOUSE Attachment 26 Reference 9-7-1112A ARRANGEMENT OF DRAGHEAD DAVIT Attachment 27 Reference 9-7-1114 ARRANGEMENT OF TRUNNION DAVIT Attachment 28 Reference 9-7-1173 DRAGARM HOISTING LAYOUT Attachment 29 Reference 9-7-1191 ARRANGEMENT OF DRAG PIPE WINCHES Attachment 30 Reference 9-7-1211 SCHEMATIC HYDRAULIC PIPING OF CLUTCH AND

BRAKE CONTROL FOR DRAG PIPE WINCHES

Attachment 31 Reference 333-F720 ONE LINE DIAGRAMS

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

REQUIRED TECHNICAL QUOTATION SUBMITTALS

The quoter shall insure that the technical quotation completely and adequately addresses all of the requirements listed below, and that each element or topic is addressed and presented in the same order as contained herewith.

The quoters may submit with their proposals, in addition to these minimum requirements, any content or description of features that may demonstrate increased efficiency, reduced maintenance, and increased durability.

As a minimum, the information listed below shall be included in each quotation submitted.

1. REQUIRED PRODUCT SUBMITTALS

a. Equipment Features

The quoter shall describe in detail the equipment being provided. Where equipment being provided is different than that called out in the Contract Drawings that quoter shall provide sufficient information to evaluate the substitution’s effectiveness for the intended application.

The quoter shall describe in detail the extent of the proposed commissioning, testing, training, and warranty. The quotation should provide a description of the extent of Factory Acceptance Testing and Site Acceptance Testing. Quoters shall describe in detail any shipyard or government support they will need to meet the requirements of this solicitation. Quoters shall comment on the availability of parts and service on the east coast. Catalog cut sheets shall be provided for the key pieces of equipment listed below. If various configurations or options are available, cut sheets shall be annotated to indicate which options are offered.

The Quoter shall specifically provide, at a minimum, a listing of the proposed major equipment, as follows:

Winch motor

Console Enclosure

Proximity Sensors

Winch Drive

Terminal block and relay system

PLCs, co-processors, and signal modules

Operator Panels

The list shall include the make and model number for each equipment offered, its performance characteristics and a catalog or vendor description that clearly describes the items to be provided. Additional items should be included as necessary to help clarify the quoter’s proposed system.

The quotation shall include a system diagram showing how the various components tie together, similar to Contract Drawing 333-F510-01 Sheet 5. The diagram should show location and size of distributed I/O blocks (if offered) as well as required cabling. The diagram shall also show any additional cabling or equipment included in the quoter’s proposed system.

b. List of Proposed Deliverables

The quoter shall provide a list of proposed deliverables (drawings, calculations, manuals, parts lists, etc.). The quoter shall submit, with the quotation, any limitations of Government rights in use of technical data.

2. REQUIRED MANAGEMENT SUBMITTALS

As a minimum the information listed below shall be included in each quotation submitted.

Additional data, which would serve to clarify the quotation, should also be submitted. Any other information deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer for a clear understanding of the quotation shall be furnished upon request.

The following lists the topics related to the quoter's Management performance capability, which must be addressed in narrative form. Sketches and/or other visual methods to convey the information are encouraged. Each topic shall be addressed to the degree necessary to provide Government reviewers with a clear understanding of what will be provided.

a. Quoter Organization

The quoter shall provide a clear identification of his organization including:

name and type of company brief history of company principal ownership, subsidiaries, and corporate affiliations any corporate certifications or credentials relevant to this work

b. Project Subcontracting Plan

If applicable, the quoter shall describe the extent of subcontracting contemplated at this time, and the specific areas to be subcontracted.

c. Project Planning / Schedule

The quoter shall submit a Project Schedule, including durations in calendar days.

The planning and scheduling information, shall demonstrate a logical, orderly and workable approach to the Project and the Contract. The schedule should show at a minimum manufacture, factory acceptance testing, delivery, installation, commissioning, and site acceptance testing.

The successful quoter will be required to perform according to his proposed Project Schedule.

d. Financial Condition

Describe why the Government should be confident that this project will be successfully completed from a financial standpoint. Report briefly on the quoter’s financial resources.

e. Payment Milestone Schedule

The quoter shall submit a milestone-based payment schedule, if performance payments are desired. The proposed payment schedule should be tied to clear milestone points in the schedule, and requested payments shall be commensurate with work performed. If the quoter does not want performance payments, they should state their intention to receive a single lump sum payment upon completion of all work.

f. Warranty

The quoter shall submit a detailed explanation of all warranties provided

3 REQUIRED SIMILAR PAST EXPERIENCE

The quoter shall provide a discussion of his past experience associated with the design and installation of similar equipment over the last five years, describing the work done, principal characteristics of the equipment, and the list of customers. The information shall include the customer name/organization, point of contact with phone numbers, contract number, approximate contract value, scope of work statement, dates of contract performance, and any additional pertinent information.

4 REQUIRED PAST PERFORMANCE SUBMITTALS

The quoter shall provide a discussion of his past performance, making reference to his rating in any formal Government or customer evaluations, as applicable. If applicable, list any contract that was terminated for the convenience of the Government within the past three years and any contract that was terminated for default in the last five years. Explain the circumstances. If none, please so indicate.

REQUIRED PRICE SUBMITTALS

1. PRICE QUOTATION

A price for the work outlined in the RFQ shall be provided with each quotation, by filling in pricing information (uint price and extended amount) for CLIN’s 0001AA through 0001AE and a total price of all CLIN’s. (pages 3,4) of this Solicitation. Note that this information must be returned with the quotation separately, or be separable from the rest of the Quotation.

Pricing must be reasonable and support a clear understanding of the requirements of this solicitation.

EVALUATION FACTORS

Evaluation Factors for Award

52.212-2 -- Evaluation -- Commercial Items

Evaluation -- Commercial Items (Jan 1999)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers and evaluation credit will be given for offers that exceed any mandatory minimums:

Technical Capability: a combined evaluation of Product, Management (risk management, organization, key personnel, safety and quality control) and Past Experience.

Past Performance: Review of relative submitted information regarding past performance of quoters and proposed subcontractors as related to probability of successfully performing solicitation requirements.

Price: Demonstrate and clearly describe an effective and efficient approach for accomplishing the stated requirements. Pricing must be competitive and reasonable against the probable cost of doing business with the Offeror, based on the merits of the “Technical

When combined Technical and Past Performance, are more important than price.

However, price will remain a significant factor.

(b) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of Clause)

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. Evaluation Factors And Sub-Factors And Their Relative Importance: Offers will be evaluated against the following factors to determine acceptability. NOTE: Evaluation credit will be given for technical solutions exceeding any mandatory minimums.

A. Proposals will be evaluated against the following factors and subfactors to determine acceptability.

i. Factor 1 Technical Capability

a. Subfactor: Product

b. Subfactor: Management

c. Subfactor: Past Experience

ii. Factor 2 Past Performance

iii. Factor 3 Price

B. Factor 1 is slightly more important than factor 2. When combined factors 1 and 2 are significantly more important than factor 3 (price). However, price will remain a significant factor.

2. Factor 1 Technical Capability: Offers that provide better detail to indicate feasibility of approach while demonstrating strengths and low risk will be considered more desirable.

A. Subfactor Product: The product will be evaluated against the criteria elements listed below: Therefore, the offer should clearly demonstrate:

i. Use of current technology

ii. Ease of maintenance and testing

iii. Availability of replacement parts

iv. Reliability

v. Durability

vi. Quality of materials

vii. Commonality of parts and manufacturers

B. Subfactor Management: Is a collective factor comprised of resource capability, quality and risk controls, and organization to successfully perform and respond to the requirements of this project. The offer that more clearly demonstrates lower risk and greater strength will be considered more favorable.

i. Availability of resources, and, as needed schedules, to satisfy the requirement within the period of performance

ii. Adequate levels of supervision, staff, employees, and or subcontractors to complete all work

iii. Quality Control and Risk Management measures that assures that materials and equipment will be available and compliant with statement of work

iv. Quality Controls measures that provide monitoring and reporting on applicable processes to ensure that all work complies with stated directives, statues, and certification requirements

v. offer , availability of resources, and organization to successfully perform and respond to the requirements of this project, in a timely manner

C. Subfactor Past Experience: The Offeror must provide information on past experience for similar work. The information should demonstrate the offeror’s experience with the design and fabrication of similar equipment within the past five years, both retrofit and new design systems.

i. Evaluation will be based on the significance and similarity of the experience to solicitation requirements. Ultimate decision on significance and similarity resides with the Government.

3. Factor 2 Past Performance Evaluation: Past Performance means the offeror’s rating on past or current contracts (including Federal, State, local government, and private) for efforts similar to the requirements over the past three (3) years. Ultimate decision on relevance resides with the Government for active, completed, and contracts terminated by the Government in the past three years, and/or any contracts defaulted in the past five years as applicable.

A. Evaluation of past performance as an indicator of an offeror’s ability to perform successfully will include:

i. Review of past performance on contracts identified in the offer

ii. Information obtained from references provided in the offer

iii. Review of offeror provided information relevant to problems encountered on the contracts identified in the offer.

B. Determination regarding the relevance of past performance to solicitation requirements will be:

i. Relevant: Past/Present effort involved much of the magnitude of effort as stated in requirements

ii. Somewhat Relevant Past/Present effort involved some of the magnitude of effort as stated in requirements.

iii. Not Relevant: Past/Present effort involved little to none of the magnitude of effort as stated in requirements.

4. Factor 3 Price: The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror’s initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary.

A. The offeror must demonstrate and effectively describe a price for each line item in section B of this solicitation. Additionally:

i. Pricing must be reasonable

ii. Support a clear understanding of the requirements of this solicitation

iii. Offerors should not submit offerors that contain unbalanced pricing.

Unbalanced pricing is considered an indicator of increased performance risk. Unbalanced pricing may cause an offer to be rejected.

DELIVERY INFO

REQUIRED DELIVERY DATE: All equipment shall be delivered by September 15, 2010

REQUIRED DELIVERY ADDRESS:

U.S. Army Corps Of Engineer Philadelphia District, Fort Mifflin – HOLD FOR MDC Project Office 6400 Hog Island Rd.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19153

For the purpose of quoting offerors may assume a Contract award date no later than April 30, 2010.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-6 Alt I Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government

(Sep 2006) -- Alternate I

OCT 1995

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Recycled Paper AUG 2000 52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic

Corporations--Representation

JUL 2009

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

SEP 2006

52.211-6 Brand Name or Equal AUG 1999 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items MAR 2009 52.215-23 Alt I Limitations on Pass-Through Charges OCT 2009 52.219-8 (DEV) Utilization of Small Business Concerns (DEVIATION) MAY 2004 52.219-25 (DEV) Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Program--

Disadvantaged Status and Reporting (DEVIATION)

APR 2008

52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003 52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities FEB 1999 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity MAR 2007 52.222-35 Equal Opportunity For Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans

SEP 2006

52.222-36 Affirmative Action For Workers With Disabilities JUN 1998 52.222-37 Employment Reports On Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans

Of The Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans

SEP 2006

52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons FEB 2009 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification JAN 2009 52.223-16 Alt I IEEE 1680 Standard for the Environmental Assessment of

Personal Computer Products (Dec 200&0 Alternate I

DEC 2007

52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008 52.225-18 Place of Manufacture SEP 2006 52.225-20 Prohibition on Conducting Restricted Business Operations in

Sudan--Certification

AUG 2009

52.227-2 Notice And Assistance Regarding Patent And Copyright Infringement

DEC 2007

52.232-28 Alt I Invitation to Propose Performance-Based Payments (Mar 2000) Alternate I

MAR 2000

52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--Central Contractor Registration

OCT 2003

52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.247-34 F.O.B. Destination NOV 1991 52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms JAN 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

JAN 2009

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights JAN 2009 252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7004 Alt A Central Contractor Registration (52.204-7) Alternate A SEP 2007 252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991 252.209-7001 Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a

Terrorist Country

JAN 2009

252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By The Government of a Terrorist Country

DEC 2006

252.225-7001 Buy American Act And Balance Of Payments Program JAN 2009 252.225-7002 Qualifying Country Sources As Subcontractors APR 2003 252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities DEC 2008 252.227-7033 Rights in Shop Drawings APR 1966 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

MAR 2008

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment MAR 1998 252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea MAY 2002 252.247-7024 Notification Of Transportation Of Supplies By Sea MAR 2000

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (DEC 2008)

(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that-

(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals-

(A) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;

(B) Have ( ) have not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property; and

(C) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision.; and

(D) Have [ballot], have not [ballot], within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,000 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.

(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:

(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.

(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.

(2) Examples. (i) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. Sec. 6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(ii) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. Sec. 6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(iii) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment.

(iv) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. 362 (the Bankruptcy Code).

(ii) The Offeror has ( ) has not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default by any Federal agency.

(2) Principal, for the purposes of this certification, means…