W9128F24R0013_Amd 0003_Issued 11 Apr 2024.pdf
PDF 621 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Aircraft Maintenance Facility Bldg. 649
- Solicitation number
- W9128F24R0013
About this file
This document is an amendment to a solicitation for the DRP Aircraft Maintenance Facility Bldg. 649 contract (Solicitation Number W9128F24R0013). The key details are:
The purpose of this amendment is to: 1) Correct the number of performance days and the maximum number of pages for the technical approach, 2) Extend the proposal due date to 15 May 2024, 3) Add site visit information for 01 May 2024, and 4) Update the specifications, drawings, and Appendix D. The total integrated contract duration shall not exceed 730 calendar days. Offerors must submit a technical approach (10-page limit), organizational approach (6-page limit), and small business participation plan (no page limit). Pricing is required to be submitted as a firm-fixed-price. The magnitude of construction costs is between $25-100 million. This is an unrestricted solicitation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is as follow s:
1. Correct the number of performance days and the maximum number of pages for the technical approach, section 00 22 16.
2. Extending proposal date to 15 May 24.
3. Add site visit information. Site visit scheduled for 01 May.
4. Updated specs, draw ings, and Appendix D.
Government POC: Michele Renkema - michele.a.renkema@usace.army.mil
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 11
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 11-Apr-2024
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W9128F24R0013
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
01-Nov-2023
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
11-Apr-2024
CODE
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DIST
CONTRACTING OFFICE
1616 CAPITOL AVENUE
OMAHA NE 68102-4901
W9128F 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
W9128F24R0013
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION, CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE
The required response date/time has changed from 15-Apr-2024 02:00 PM to 15-May-2024 02:00 PM.
SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS
The following have been modified:
52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995)
(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.
(b) Site visits may on 01 May 2024, meeting at 0900 CST at the Visitor Center.
(End of provision)
SECTION 00 22 16 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
The following have been modified:
SECTION 00 22 16 - PHASE 2
INSTRUCTIONS PHASE 2
00 22 16
Instructions to Offerors Phase 2 Volume II & III
*NOTE: DO NOT SUBMIT PHASE 2: VOLUME II UNTIL AFTER THE AMENDMENT IS ISSUED ONLY
TO THOSE OFFERORS SELECTED FOR PHASE 2.
7. VOLUME II – FACTOR 3 –TECHNICAL APPROACH AND SUMMARY SCHEDULE
7.1. Submission Requirements (The page limit for this factor is ten (10) pages total, summary schedule not included in the ten (10) page total).
7.2. Provide information that describes the offeror’s intended technical approach to executing the design and construction of this project. The narrative for the technical approach of this factor must be no longer than ten (10) pages, including any explanatory diagrams. If more than ten (10) pages are submitted, only the first ten pages will be evaluated. At a minimum, the narrative MUST address the Technical Approach for Design and Construction as described below.
7.3. Technical Approach for Design and Construction: Describe the technical approach to design and construction of the DRP Aircraft Maintenance Facility Bldg. 649. Include considerations for phasing of the facilities. Explain the rational for the order of construction. Include any considerations of innovative design concepts and construction processes and products.
7.4. Describe your technical approach for designing and constructing/renovating the secured spaces within the DRP Aircraft Maintenance Facility Bldg. 649.
7.5. Proposed contract duration: the offeror must propose the contract duration in the appropriate contract line-item number in the CLIN schedule.
7.6. Summary schedule: Submit a summary level schedule for integrated design and construction. Schedules or diagrams, in a size that is easily read, but not exceeding 11” x 17”.
This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by section 01 32 01.00 10: Project Schedule. The schedules must be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved.
Provide a schedule to complete all work based on an arbitrary estimated, non-binding notice to proceed date of 10 July 2024. Offeror may use a critical path or other method of (h)is/er choice;
however, schedules must be graphically represented. The proposed project schedule must reflect the proposed contract duration. Give attention to the following features:
7.6.1. Provide a narrative respective to the summary schedule, describing the design packaging plan for separate design packages, if applicable. If long lead item equipment must be ordered prior to completion of a design phase, describe the requirement in the narrative and show the required ordering date in the schedule.
7.6.2. The Offeror shall propose a total integrated contract duration in number of calendar days after the Notice to Proceed (NTP) is received by the Contractor. The total number of proposed calendar days for construction through completion, ready for turnover shall not exceed the benchmark duration of 730 calendar days. The proposed duration shall be negotiated on the required contract duration. The Government may issue the NTP via e-mail or Facsimile (FAX) or by other means. Day number 1 is the day after the date of receipt of the NTP. See Section 00 72 00, 52.211-10.
COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK.
7.6.3. Limit this narrative to five (5) pages. The summary schedule is not included in the page limitation.
7.6.4. Schedule must include:
(a) Show design schedule to include each milestone of submittal, review, review conference, corrected and issue for construction set.
(b) Show the overall construction phase for the facilities, the site work and the utilities. Include any long lead items and any fast-tracking starts. It isn’t necessary to show the detailed breakdown construction (e.g., by trades) of each facility, site work and utilities.
(c) Show schedule line items for environmental permits and notifications and utility connection permits.
(d) Show turnover of facility. The duration to complete the facility and turnover to include Red Zone, Government walk-through and final turnover. the government must consider the requirement for the Contractor Quality Control (CQC) completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspection.
(e) Show as-built submissions (See section 01 78 39.00 24 AS-BUILT
DRAWINGS).
(f) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period.
Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.
7.7 Evaluation Criteria
Strengths may be given for each the following criteria:
• Proposals that demonstrate a detailed and coherent plan and provides logical methodology to execute the entire scope of work for both design and construction.
• Proposals that offer methods to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints in an effort to reduce costs and support a schedule to completion.
• Proposals with schedules that demonstrate an understanding of processes inherent to
USACE.
• Proposals that demonstrate a clear and executable understanding of the order of work, construction phasing, and access management procedures defined in the RFP drawings and specifications in context of the offeror’s plan to perform the work communicated by their technical approach for construction.
• Proposals that illustrate an understanding of construction practices inherent to northern climates.
• Self-performance of major construction tasks by the Prime Contractor.
• Any other aspect of a proposal that the evaluators and/or the SSA believe enhances the merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.
Weaknesses may be given for each of the following criteria:
• A technical approach to either design or construction that does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the solicitation requirements associated with the specification.
• A proposed schedule whose duration is greater than that stated in the subject solicitation (without discussion for exceeding duration).
• A proposed schedule that unreasonably condenses contract duration well below the period of performance (without discussion) which as determined by the government may increases cost or create a risk of contract/performance failure.
• A proposed schedule which does not address the five (5) features as described under Para 7.6.4 Summary Schedule (a) through (e).
• Any other aspect of a proposal that the Government identifies as a flaw that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.
Deficiencies shall be given for each of the following criteria:
• A technical approach that does not demonstrate the Prime Offeror as the lead entity for this project.
• Omission of either of the two (2) items in this element as stated above, Technical Approach, and Summary Schedule. Any other material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.
• Any other material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level
8.VOLUME II – FACTOR 4 – ORGANIZATIONAL APPROACH
8.1. Submission Requirements (The page limit for this factor is six (6) pages total)
8.2. Provide information that describes the offeror’s Project Management approach to executing the design-build contract per the detailed requirements herein. Clearly and concisely describe the organizational and technical approaches to project management and execution, and contract duration. The Government will not evaluate any information more than the page limit.
8.3. Organization. List the design and construction entities and describe their resources and how the offeror will utilize their resources, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each entity’s roles and responsibilities on the project. Include a simple organizational chart, illustrating the organization, including the proposed quality control group(s).
Identify the design firm(s) chosen for the project, if not to be self-performed. The offeror must document unequivocal teaming arrangements with its lead design entity(ies) and key subcontractors. Describe the proposed management structure for the team, how the offeror will manage the design and construction process and the authorities, and the delegations of authority within the team. Include a key personnel organization chart that clearly depicts the key positions and the names of the personnel, their firm affiliations and their job locations and their job/position title within the organization. The key personnel organization chart must be consistent with the corporate organization chart, with the matrix of responsibilities assigned to the D-B team entities, and with the list of key personnel to under Factor 2.
8.4. General Approach for Design and Construction. Describe the general approach to design and construction of this project. This section should demonstrate the roles of the design and construction entities.
8.5. Evaluation Criteria
• Proposals that demonstrate a detailed and coherent organizational plan and provides logical methodology to execute the entire scope of work. Joint Venture/Subcontractors participants’ contribution to the organization should be commensurate with their skills and background.
• Proposals that demonstrate a clear understanding and/or usage of local subcontractors, the subcontractor market, and economy and/or how it will impact this project.
• Self-performance of major construction tasks by the Prime Contractor
• Any other aspect of a proposal that the evaluators and/or the SSA believe enhances merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.
• An organization plan that does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the solicitation requirements associated with the specification.
• Proposals that do not demonstrate a clear understanding and/or usage of local subcontractors, the subcontractor market, and/or economy and how it will impact this project.
• Any other aspect of a proposal that the Government identifies as a flaw that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.
• An organizational plan that does not demonstrate the Prime Offeror as the lead entity for this project.
• Omission of Organization Approach items such as table, stated responsibilities or clearly stated in paragraph 8.3.
• Any other material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level
9. VOLUME II – FACTOR 5 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN (REQUIRED FOR ALL
OFFERORS)
9.1. Submission Requirements (There is no page limitation for Small Business Participation Plan)
9.2. This factor requires all Offerors, regardless of size status to address their planned small business usage for this project. All Offerors are required to provide a Small Business Participation Plan (SBPP). It should address their corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting, and using small businesses in the performance of this contract. All documentation for this factor should address the Offeror's commitments to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and /or continued outreach efforts to encourage and use small businesses. This plan should include a breakdown of small business subcategories to be used as shown in (d) and (e) below.
9.3. The SBPP should describe the efforts the Offeror will make to ensure small business participation of the following categories: Small Businesses (SBs), Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSBs), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs) HUBZone Small Businesses (HUB), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs), and Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSBs).
9.4. Offerors should propose the level of participation of small businesses (as a small business prime, joint venture, teaming arrangement, and/or small business subcontractors) in the performance of the acquisition relative to the objectives/goals set forth in the evaluation of this area. The SBPP should identify all categories for participation as part of the Offeror's team. This should include a general description of the type of work, product or service anticipated to be supplied via a small business concern.
9.5. A specific format is not required, however, items stated below (a) through (f) must be provided as a minimum.
9.5.1. Provide a Narrative addressing the corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting, and using small businesses in the performance of this contract.
The Narrative should address the Offeror's commitment to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and /or continued outreach efforts to encourage and use small businesses. The Narrative should provide detailed supporting documentation regarding the individual commitment expressed in percentages for evaluators to determine the goals stated are realistic.
9.5.2. Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror for this procurement –
Check all applicable boxes:
{ } Large Prime
- or - { } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a:
{ } Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) { } Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) { } Historically Underutilized Zone (HUB Zone) Small Business { } Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB) { } Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)
9.5.3. Submit the total percentages of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (include the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime, joint venture, teaming arrangement, and subcontractors). Percentages are based on Total Contract Value. For this project, the small business participation goal is 25% of the Total Contract Value performed by the Small Business Community.
Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es): =______% Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es): =______% (Small Business Prime Contractors – Include yourselves in the above percentage.)
For example: If you are a Small Business Prime Contractor and will be doing 40% of the work and you will be subcontracting another 20% of the Total Contract Value to other small business firms, then your Total Percentage planned for Small Business will equal 60%.
9.5.4. Indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of subcategory small business. The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:
For example: Firm A (WOSB and SDVOSB) performing 2%; and Firm B (SDB, HubZ and WOSB) performing 3%. Results equate to: SB 5%; SDB 3%; HubZone 3%; WOSB 5%;
SDVOSB 2%; VOSB 2%;). SDVOSBs are also VOSBs automatically; however, VOSBs are not automatically SDVOSBs.
Percentage
Small Business Small Disadvantaged Business HUB Zone Small Business Woman Owned Small Business Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned SB Veteran-Owned Small Business
9.5.5. Identify the Prime Offeror and type of service/supply that the Prime Offeror will provide. Then list each of the intended subcontractors and principal supplies/services to be provided by that subcontractor. Provide the Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code for the Prime and each intended subcontractor. Also, provide the anticipated NAICS codes(s) that the Prime Offeror believes best describes the product or services being acquired by its subcontracts with each intended subcontractor. Small business Primes and small business subcontractors that qualify as small businesses in multiple small business categories should be listed in each applicable small business category.
Firm Name CAGE Code NAICS code Type of Service
Prime Offeror
Large Business
Small Business
SDB
WOSB
HUBZone
VOSB
SDVOSB
Note: Pursuant to Sections 8(d) of the Small Business Act, a business is considered small for Government procurements if it does not exceed the size standard for the NAICS code that the prime contractor believes best describes the product or services being acquired. In other words, the size of the prime’s suppliers is determined by the applicable NAICS code of their joint venture, teaming partner, or subcontract, which may or may not be the same NAICS code as the one for your prime contract with the Government.
9.5.6. Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (e.g., what types of commitments, if any, are in place for this specific acquisition either – small business prime, written contract, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.) Provide documentation regarding commitments to small business for this effort. Copies of such agreements should be provided as part of your small business participation plan and will not count against the page limitation for this volume.
9.5.7. Other than U.S. Small Business offerors should submit the Individual Subcontracting Report (ISR) from eSRS for each project submitted under Factor 1 – Past Performance. An equivalent report can be provided for non-Government/DoD projects submitted, which will show past performance in subcontracting to small businesses.
9.6 The Small Business Participation Commitment Document shall be consistent with the resultant Subcontracting Plan (if submitting a proposal as an Other-Than-Small-Business) and will be evaluated as follows:
• Offerors that propose a Total Small Business Participation percentage exceeding 25%.
• A proposal that indicates a realistic and thorough approach and understanding of the small business objectives in respect to this project.
• A SBPCD that provides clear detail of the services/supplies that small business firms are to perform
• Copies of agreements regarding commitments with all small business firms who are identified in the SBPCD.
• Any other aspect of a proposal that the evaluators and/or the SSA believe enhances the merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.
• A proposed Total Small Business Participation percentage less than the stated goal of 25%.
• Information submitted for items as stated above that is general or ambiguous language.
• Omission or incompleteness of any requested information that is not otherwise a deficiency
• Any other aspect of a proposal that the Government identifies as a flaw that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.
• Omission of any item as stated in paragraphs 9.1 thru 9.5.7.
• Any other material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.
* NOTE: DO NOT SUBMIT PHASE 2: VOLUME III UNTIL AFTER THE AMENDMENT IS
ISSUED ONLY TO THOSE OFFERORS SELECTED FOR PHASE 2
10. VOLUME III – FACTOR 6 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION
10.1. Submission Requirements (There is no page limitation for Factor 6)
10.2. Price: This volume must consist of all information required to support proposed prices.
Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. The information submitted in this volume must comply with the submission requirements set forth below. The Offeror must ensure that the information submitted in this volume is consistent with and fully supports the amounts set forth in the price schedule, SF1442 and continuation sheets.
10.3. Your proposed price for this project must be in the form of the Proposal/Price Schedule provided in this solicitation and contained in Section 00 10 00. Offerors may not modify the price schedule wording or format. As this is a firm fixed-price contract, price proposals will not be considered which provide for subsequent increases in price. No qualified price proposal of any type will be accepted; therefore, all offers containing such qualifications will be considered unacceptable. If the Offeror does not comply with all requirements of the proposal format, the proposal may be considered non-compliant and eliminated from consideration.
10.4. Prices must be entered for all items of the schedule. Total amounts submitted without prices being entered on individual items will be rejected. Additions will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the Job (lump-sum) prices and the total amount, the lump-sum prices will be considered the price submitted.
10.5. Supplemental Price Breakdown. After Volume III submission and if deemed necessary to analyze cost/price elements of the price proposals further, the Government may request a price breakdown of the Contract Line Items in an Excel format. If this were to occur, the Government will provide details on where and how to send the breakdown. If requested, this information will not be needed sooner than three working days after the proposal submission due date.
10.6. Bond Ability: Submit information showing offeror's bond ability in the amount of the proposal. Include the name, address, and telephone number of the prime contractor's bonding agent. No formal bond is requested at this time.
10.7 Evaluation Criteria:
The contract will be a Firm Fixed Priced (FFP) contract. The Government will evaluate price reasonableness for the fixed priced effort. The base and all options shall be included in the price evaluation.
The RFP requires Firm-Fixed-Price contract line items. A price reasonableness approach will be utilized by the Government to determine that the proposed prices offered are fair and reasonable and that unbalanced pricing between CLINs or Options is not occurring. Price reasonableness will be determined by using proposal price analysis techniques as detailed in FAR 15.
Offerors are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor, equipment, subcontracts, etc. and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. If deemed necessary, the supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price analysis described above.
Bond Ability: This item is not rated. Bonding information will be reviewed to determine the offeror's ability to obtain the required Performance and Payment Bonds. The successful offeror will be required upon award to be able to obtain the level of bonding required by the solicitation from an acceptable surety.
11. Subpart 5122.13 – Equal Opportunity for Veterans
UAI 5122.1302-100 Scope of subpart. For contracts that require the inclusion of FAR clause 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans, the requiring activity shall incorporate the following text in the general requirements section of the specification/performance work statement/statement of work/statement of objectives.
Veterans Employment Emphasis for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contracts In addition to complying with the requirements outlined in FAR Part 22.13, FAR Provision 52.222-38, FAR Clause 52.222-35, FAR Clause 52.222-37, DFARS
222.13 and Department of Labor regulations, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) contractors and subcontractors at all tiers are encouraged to promote the training and employment of U.S. veterans while performing under a USACE contract. While no set-aside, evaluation preference, or incentive applies to the solicitation or performance under the resultant contract, USACE contractors are encouraged to seek out highly qualified veterans to perform services under this contract. The following resources are available to assist USACE contractors in their outreach efforts:
-U.S. Department of Labor Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS):
https://www.dol.gov/vets/ -Federal Veteran Employment Information:
https://www.fedshirevets.gov/ -Veterans Opportunity to Work (VOW) Program:
https://www.benefits.va.gov/vow/ -U.S. Army Warrior Transition Command Employment Index:
https://wct.army.mil/modules/employers/index.html -Hiring Our Heroes:
https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/hiring-our-heroes (End of special contract requirement)
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .