12r8-am1.pdf
PDF 202 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9128A12R0008
About this file
Original AM-0001
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 12r8-am29.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am28.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am27.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am26.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am25_28jan15.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am24-10dec14.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am23-28oct14.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am22.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am21.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am20.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am19.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am18.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am17.pdf | ||
| sf30-12r8-am16.pdf | ||
| sf30-12r8-am15.pdf | ||
| sf30-12r8-am14.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am13.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am12.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am11.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am10.pdf | ||
| 12r8-am9.pdf | ||
| sf30-12r8-am8.pdf | ||
| sf30-12r8-am7.pdf | ||
| sf30-12r8-am6.pdf | ||
| sf30-12r8-am5.pdf | ||
| sf30-12r8-am4.pdf | ||
| 12r8.pdf | ||
| 12r8-sf1449-am2.pdf |
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1 2
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)
AM-0001 6 Aug 12
6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
Contracting Division USAED, Honolulu, Bldg 230 Ft Shafter, HI 96858-5440
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State, and Zip Code) (x) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
W9128A-12-R-0008
X
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10 Jul 2012
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
CODE FACILITY CODE
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
[ X ]The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ X ] is extended, [ ] is not extended.
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __1__ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
(x) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ ] is not, [ ] is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) for Cultural Resources and Related Investigations and Studies in the Pacific Ocean Region
(Continued on the next page)
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED
BY
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
NSN 7540-01-152-8070
PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE
30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Am-0001 Standard Form 30 RFP No. W9128A-12-R-0008 Page 2 of 2 Pages Item 14 (Continued)
1. CHANGES TO SOLICITATION. Attached is the revised page to the solicitation..
Revised page replace like-numbered page. The revision mark “(Am-0001)” is shown on the bottom of the revised page.
Standard Form 1449 Block 8
2. The receipt of proposals date IS EXTENDED (See SF 1449, Page 1, Block 8).
CECT - CONTRACTING DIVISION
USACE, HONOLULU
BLDG 230, ROOM 103
FT. SHAFTER HI 96858-5440
808-835-4386 808-835-4396
UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)
11. DELIVERY FOR FOB
RFQ
SEE SCHEDULE
14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION
IFB RFP
CODE
SEE ADDENDUM
BLOCK IS MARKED
DESTINATION UNLESS
12. DISCOUNT TERMS
(No Collect Calls)
19M
13b. RATING
13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER
X
CODE
W9128A-12-R-0008
b. TELEPHONE NUMBER 808-835-4388
8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME
5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.212
(TYPE OR PRINT)
(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER) 31c. DATE SIGNED
ADDENDA X ARE
26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Govt. Use Only)
22. UNIT 23. UNIT PRICE 24. AMOUNT
21. QUANTITY
CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS
UNRESTRICTED
FAX: NAICS:
TEL:
CODE 18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY OFFEROR
SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER
17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT
BELOW IS CHECKED
TEL.
W9128A
SIZE STD:
9. ISSUED BY
FACILITY
CODE
17a.CONTRACTOR/
18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK
15. DELIVER TO CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BY
SEE SCHEDULE
7. FOR SOLICITATION
INFORMATION CALL:
a. NAME
TIMOTHY GRIFFIN
2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER
(TYPE OR PRINT)
30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
1 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED. X
25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
1. REQUISITION NUMBER
19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES
SEE SCHEDULE
541720
TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND DELIVER ALL ITEMS
SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY ADDITIONAL SHEETS
SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED HEREIN.
SB
HUBZONE SB
SET ASIDE: 100 % FOR
OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
ARE NOT ATTACHED
27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED
TEL: EMAIL:
2 COPIES
(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE
SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:
. OFFER DATED YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION
28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN 29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REFERENCE X
8(A)
SVC-DISABLED VET-OWNED SB
EMERGING SB
j3ct9kat Typewritten Text j3ct9kat Typewritten Text j3ct9kat Typewritten Text j3ct9kat Typewritten Text j3ct9kat Typewritten Text j3ct9kat Typewritten Text j3ct9kat Typewritten Text j3ct9kat Typewritten Text 7/10/12 j3ct9kat Typewritten Text j3ct9kat Typewritten Text j3ct9kat Typewritten Text
(AM-0001)
j3ct9kat Typewritten Text j3ct9kat Typewritten Text 11/15/12,1400hrs
| 12r8-sf1449-am1.pdf |
| 12r8-sample proj-Proposal Schedule.pdf |
| PROPOSAL SCHEDULE |
| PAYMENT(S) |
| 12r8-sample project.pdf |
| 12r8-sample proj-QASP.pdf |
| 1 INTRODUCTION |
| This quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP) is pursuant to the requirements listed in the scope of work (SOW) entitled “Cultural Resources Support for MEC Actions and Activities, Formerly-Used Defense Sites, Hawaii”. This plan sets forth the procedures and guidelines the Corps of Engineers will use in ensuring the required performance standards or services levels are achieved by the contractor. |
| 1.1 Purpose |
| 1.1.1 The purpose of the QASP is to describe the systematic methods used to monitor performance and to identify the required documentation and the resources to be employed. The QASP provides a means for evaluating whether the contractor is meeting the performance standards/quality levels identified in the PWS and the contractor’s quality control plan (QCP), and to ensure that the government pays only for the level of services received. |
| 1.1.2 This QASP defines the roles and responsibilities of all members of the integrated project team (IPT), identifies the performance objectives, defines the methodologies used to monitor and evaluate the contractor’s performance, describes quality assurance documentation requirements, and describes the analysis of quality assurance monitoring results. |
| 1.2 Performance Management Approach |
| 1.2.1 The PWS structures the acquisition around “what” service or quality level is required, as opposed to “how” the contractor should perform the work (i.e., results, not compliance). This QASP will define the performance management approach taken by CEPOH-PP-E to monitor and manage the contractor’s performance to ensure the expected outcomes or performance objectives communicated in the PWS are achieved. Performance management rests on developing a capability to review and analyze information generated through performance assessment. The ability to make decisions based on the analysis of performance data is the cornerstone of performance management; this analysis yields information that indicates whether expected outcomes for the project are being achieved by the contractor. |
| 1.2.2 Performance management represents a significant shift from the more traditional quality assurance (QA) concepts in several ways. Performance management focuses on assessing whether outcomes are being achieved and to what extent. This approach migrates away from scrutiny of compliance with the processes and practices used to achieve the outcome. A performance-based approach enables the contractor to play a large role in how the work is performed, as long as the proposed processes are within the stated constraints. The only exceptions to process reviews are those required by law (federal, state, and local) and compelling business situations, such as safety and health. A “results” focus provides the contractor flexibility to continuously improve and innovate over the course of the contract as long as the critical outcomes expected are being achieved and/or the desired performance levels are being met. |
| 1.3 Performance Management Strategy |
| 1.3.1 The contractor is responsible for the quality of all work performed. The contractor measures that quality through the contractor’s own quality control (QC) program. QC is work output, not workers, and therefore includes all work performed under this contract regardless of whether the work is performed by contractor employees or by subcontractors. The contractor’s QCP will set forth the staffing and procedures for self-inspecting the quality, timeliness, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and other performance requirements in the PWS. The contractor will develop and implement a performance management system with processes to assess and report its performance to the designated government representative. The contractor’s QCP will set forth the staffing and procedures for self-inspecting the quality, timeliness, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and other performance requirements in the PWS. This QASP enables the government to take advantage of the contractor’s QC program. |
| 2 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES |
| 2.1 The Contracting Officer |
| 2.2 The Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative |
| 3 IDENTIFICATION OF REQUIRED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS/QUALITY LEVELS |
| 4 METHODOLOGIES TO MONITOR PERFORMANCE |
| 4.1 Surveillance Techniques |
| 4.2 Customer Feedback |
| 4.3 Acceptable Quality Levels |
| 5 QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION |
| 5.1 The Performance Management Feedback Loop |
| 5.2 Monitoring Forms |
| 5.2.1 The PM will retain a copy of all completed QA surveillance forms. |
| 6 ANALYSIS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENT |
| 6.1 Determining Performance |
| 6.1.1 Government shall use the monitoring methods cited to determine whether the performance standards/service levels/AQLs have been met. If the contractor has not met the minimum requirements, it may be asked to develop a corrective action plan to show how and by what date it intends to bring performance up to the required levels. |
| 6.2 Reporting |
| 6.2.1 At the beginning of each month, the PM will prepare a written report for the COR summarizing the overall results of the quality assurance surveillance of the contractor’s performance. This written report, which includes the contractor’s submitted monthly report and the completed quality assurance monitoring forms, will become part of the QA documentation. It will enable the government to demonstrate whether the contractor is meeting the stated objectives and/or performance standards, including cost/technical/scheduling objectives. |
| 6.3 Reviews and Resolution |
| 6.3.1 The PM may require the contractor’s project manager, or a designated alternate, to meet with the PM and other government IPT personnel as deemed necessary to discuss performance evaluation. The PM will define a frequency of in-depth reviews with the contractor, including appropriate self-assessments by the contractor; however, if the need arises, the contractor will meet with the PM as often as required or per the contractor’s request. The agenda of the reviews may include: |
| 6.3.2 The QAR must coordinate and communicate with the contractor to resolve issues and concerns regarding marginal or unacceptable performance. |
| 6.3.3 The PM and contractor should jointly formulate tactical and long-term courses of action. Decisions regarding changes to metrics, thresholds, or service levels should be clearly documented. Changes to service levels, procedures, and metrics will be incorporated as a contract modification at the convenience of the PCO/ACO. |
ATTACHMENT 1: PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
| 12r8-Ordering Schedule.pdf |
| ORDERING SCHEDULE |
| 12r8-Ordering Schedule.pdf |
| ORDERING SCHEDULE |
| 12r8-sample proj-Proposal Schedule.pdf |
| SAMPLE |
| PROPOSAL SCHEDULE |
| PAYMENT(S) |
| 12r8-matoc proposal schedule-8jun12.pdf |
| Sheet1 |
| 12r8-sf1449-am1.pdf |
| 12r8-sample proj-Proposal Schedule.pdf |
| PROPOSAL SCHEDULE |
| PAYMENT(S) |
| 12r8-sample project.pdf |
| 12r8-sample proj-QASP.pdf |
| 1 INTRODUCTION |
| This quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP) is pursuant to the requirements listed in the scope of work (SOW) entitled “Cultural Resources Support for MEC Actions and Activities, Formerly-Used Defense Sites, Hawaii”. This plan sets forth the procedures and guidelines the Corps of Engineers will use in ensuring the required performance standards or services levels are achieved by the contractor. |
| 1.1 Purpose |
| 1.1.1 The purpose of the QASP is to describe the systematic methods used to monitor performance and to identify the required documentation and the resources to be employed. The QASP provides a means for evaluating whether the contractor is meeting the performance standards/quality levels identified in the PWS and the contractor’s quality control plan (QCP), and to ensure that the government pays only for the level of services received. |
| 1.1.2 This QASP defines the roles and responsibilities of all members of the integrated project team (IPT), identifies the performance objectives, defines the methodologies used to monitor and evaluate the contractor’s performance, describes quality assurance documentation requirements, and describes the analysis of quality assurance monitoring results. |
| 1.2 Performance Management Approach |
| 1.2.1 The PWS structures the acquisition around “what” service or quality level is required, as opposed to “how” the contractor should perform the work (i.e., results, not compliance). This QASP will define the performance management approach taken by CEPOH-PP-E to monitor and manage the contractor’s performance to ensure the expected outcomes or performance objectives communicated in the PWS are achieved. Performance management rests on developing a capability to review and analyze information generated through performance assessment. The ability to make decisions based on the analysis of performance data is the cornerstone of performance management; this analysis yields information that indicates whether expected outcomes for the project are being achieved by the contractor. |
| 1.2.2 Performance management represents a significant shift from the more traditional quality assurance (QA) concepts in several ways. Performance management focuses on assessing whether outcomes are being achieved and to what extent. This approach migrates away from scrutiny of compliance with the processes and practices used to achieve the outcome. A performance-based approach enables the contractor to play a large role in how the work is performed, as long as the proposed processes are within the stated constraints. The only exceptions to process reviews are those required by law (federal, state, and local) and compelling business situations, such as safety and health. A “results” focus provides the contractor flexibility to continuously improve and innovate over the course of the contract as long as the critical outcomes expected are being achieved and/or the desired performance levels are being met. |
| 1.3 Performance Management Strategy |
| 1.3.1 The contractor is responsible for the quality of all work performed. The contractor measures that quality through the contractor’s own quality control (QC) program. QC is work output, not workers, and therefore includes all work performed under this contract regardless of whether the work is performed by contractor employees or by subcontractors. The contractor’s QCP will set forth the staffing and procedures for self-inspecting the quality, timeliness, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and other performance requirements in the PWS. The contractor will develop and implement a performance management system with processes to assess and report its performance to the designated government representative. The contractor’s QCP will set forth the staffing and procedures for self-inspecting the quality, timeliness, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and other performance requirements in the PWS. This QASP enables the government to take advantage of the contractor’s QC program. |
| 2 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES |
| 2.1 The Contracting Officer |
| 2.2 The Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative |
| 3 IDENTIFICATION OF REQUIRED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS/QUALITY LEVELS |
| 4 METHODOLOGIES TO MONITOR PERFORMANCE |
| 4.1 Surveillance Techniques |
| 4.2 Customer Feedback |
| 4.3 Acceptable Quality Levels |
| 5 QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION |
| 5.1 The Performance Management Feedback Loop |
| 5.2 Monitoring Forms |
| 5.2.1 The PM will retain a copy of all completed QA surveillance forms. |
| 6 ANALYSIS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENT |
| 6.1 Determining Performance |
| 6.1.1 Government shall use the monitoring methods cited to determine whether the performance standards/service levels/AQLs have been met. If the contractor has not met the minimum requirements, it may be asked to develop a corrective action plan to show how and by what date it intends to bring performance up to the required levels. |
| 6.2 Reporting |
| 6.2.1 At the beginning of each month, the PM will prepare a written report for the COR summarizing the overall results of the quality assurance surveillance of the contractor’s performance. This written report, which includes the contractor’s submitted monthly report and the completed quality assurance monitoring forms, will become part of the QA documentation. It will enable the government to demonstrate whether the contractor is meeting the stated objectives and/or performance standards, including cost/technical/scheduling objectives. |
| 6.3 Reviews and Resolution |
| 6.3.1 The PM may require the contractor’s project manager, or a designated alternate, to meet with the PM and other government IPT personnel as deemed necessary to discuss performance evaluation. The PM will define a frequency of in-depth reviews with the contractor, including appropriate self-assessments by the contractor; however, if the need arises, the contractor will meet with the PM as often as required or per the contractor’s request. The agenda of the reviews may include: |
| 6.3.2 The QAR must coordinate and communicate with the contractor to resolve issues and concerns regarding marginal or unacceptable performance. |
| 6.3.3 The PM and contractor should jointly formulate tactical and long-term courses of action. Decisions regarding changes to metrics, thresholds, or service levels should be clearly documented. Changes to service levels, procedures, and metrics will be incorporated as a contract modification at the convenience of the PCO/ACO. |
ATTACHMENT 1: PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
| 12r8-Ordering Schedule.pdf |
| ORDERING SCHEDULE |
| 12r8-Ordering Schedule.pdf |
| ORDERING SCHEDULE |
| 12r8-sample proj-Proposal Schedule.pdf |
| SAMPLE |
| PROPOSAL SCHEDULE |
| PAYMENT(S) |
| 12r8-matoc proposal schedule-8jun12.pdf |
| Sheet1 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .