W9127S20R0008 - IDC SATOC for Minor Construction Little Rock District.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- IDC SATOC for Minor Constructions, Little Rock District Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W9127S20R0008
About this file
This solicitation seeks proposals for an Indefinite Delivery Contract (IDC) Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) to provide minor construction services to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock District. Services may include mechanical, electrical, structural, and facility repairs as well as concrete work, asphalt paving, interior remodeling, roof and window replacements, and maintenance of recreational facilities. The contract has a maximum value of $72.5 million over a five-year period including options. Proposals are due by August 5, 2020. The solicitation is set aside for eligible 8(a) small businesses and utilizes RSMeans cost estimating software with cost coefficients. The selected contractor must purchase licenses for the software and provide training. Task orders will be issued on a firm-fixed-price basis against a seed project price schedule.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amend 0003 - 00_Bid Schedule (20R0008 - IDC SATOC for Minor Constructions).xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Amend 0003 - Price-Bid Schedule.pdf | ||
| W9127S20R0008 - IDC SATOC - Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002 - TR Roadway and Bridge Rehabilitation.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 2 - NAVFAC-USACE Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| ProjNet Questions and Responses 29Jul2020.pdf | ||
| W9127S20R0008 - IDC SATOC - Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Drawing 1422105 for catwalk.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 1 - Proposal Data Sheet.pdf | ||
| W9127S20R0008 - Table Rock Roadway Repair Drawings (Seed Project).pdf | ||
| W9127S20R0008 - Table Rock Roadway Repair Specs (Seed Project).pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Title: Indefinite Delivery Contract (IDC) Single Aw ard Task Order Contract (SATOC) for various minor construction, renovation, repair, and alteration of structural and non-structural projects.
Project Location: Work w ill be restricted to SBA regions VI and VII w hich cover the geographic boundary of the Little Rock District Corps of Engineers.
The solicitation is set-aside for eligible 8(a) concerns.
The aw ard w ill be for a 24 month base period and three 12 month option periods. The aw ard amount for this requirement is NTE $72,500,000.00 for the duration of the contract including the option years.
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS
NEGOTIATED
06-Jul-2020
(RFP)
(IFB)
X
CALL:
B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
See Item 7
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
SEALED BID
3. DATE ISSUED
9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME
SOLICITATION
NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________720 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________See 00 73 00
12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
X YES NO
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________05 Aug 2020 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.
shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.
B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.
C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
1. SOLICITATION NO.
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
4. CONTRACT NO.
7. ISSUED BY CODE
CONTRACTING DIVISION
USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)
700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM 7315
LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225
W9127S
PAGE OF PAGES
1 OF
CODE
(Title, identifying no., date):
12B. CALENDAR DAYS
02:00 PM (hour)
Sealed envelopes containing offers
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)
(501) 324-5196FAX:TEL: (501) 340-5720 TEL: FAX:
W9127S20R0008 87
20B. SIGNATURE
(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK
TO SIGN
NSN 7540-01-155-3212
SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
CODE FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)
AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)
AMENDMENT NO.
DATE
20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
OFFER (Type or print)
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
CODE
(Insert any number equal to or greater than
20C. OFFER DATE
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)
CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY
(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)
See Item 14
(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
30B. SIGNATURE
29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .
gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.
30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
30C. DATE
(Type or print)
TEL: EMAIL:
31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE
BY
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER
[Type here]
Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
00 10 00 Solicitation, Table of Contents, CLIN & Pricing Schedule, Delivery Information, Coefficient Factor & Section 00 21 11
00 21 00 Instructions
00 70 00 Conditions of the Contract
00 72 00 General Conditions
00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions, SOW dated June2020 (28 Pages), Wage Determination
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
0001 1 Job Base Year - IDC SATOC
FFP
Little Rock District IDC SATOC - Contract Period: August 1, 2020 through July 31, 2022 FOB: Destination
PSC CD: Y1QA
NET AMT
1001 1 Job OPTION Option Year 1 - IDC SATOC
FFP
Little Rock District IDC SATOC - Contract Period: August 1, 2022 through July 31, 2023
2001 1 Job OPTION Option Year 2 - IDC SATOC
FFP
Little Rock District IDC SATOC - Contract Period: August 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024
3001 1 Job OPTION Option Year 3 - IDC SATOC
FFP
Little Rock District IDC SATOC - Contract Period: August 1, 2024 through July 31, 2025
DELIVERY INFORMATION
CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /
CAGE
0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A
1001 N/A N/A N/A N/A
2001 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3001 N/A N/A N/A N/A
COEFFICIENT FACTOR
Little Rock District Indefinite Delivery Contract (IDC) Single Award Task Order Contract
(SATOC)
Coefficient Factor Pricing Schedule
ITEM NUMBER COEFFICIENT DESCRIPTION COEFFICIENT
0001 Normal Working Hours ________
0002 Other than Normal Working Hours ________
0003 Non-Prepriced Percent Factor ________
RS MEANS ESTIMATING SOFTWARE:
a. The Estimating Software for use under this contract is the facility construction and maintenance estimating system “ RS Means CostWorks” (RS Means). The RS Means estimating system is a windows XP or later operating system. Under the terms of this contract the Contractor will be required to purchase the RS Means estimating system software and provide two (2) copies of the license agreement to the Government. Additionally, the contractor will be required to pay for software training on the RS Means estimating system.
Contractor/Government Training will be conducted at the Little Rock Corps of Engineers District Office subsequent to contract award. Further information may be obtained by contacting RS Means CostWorks, 700 Longwater Drive, Norwell, MA 02061, 1-800-334-3509, www.rsmeans.com.
b. The Contractor will also be required to purchase and provide five (5) copies of annual updates to RS Means to the Government on January 01 of each calendar year, commencing on January 01, 2021 through January 01, 2026, during the active term of the contract. Cost of all software license agreements and training will be factored into the offeror’s coefficient.
c. Throughout the life of this contract the most current RS Means software shall be used in pricing the work to be performed. This eliminates the need for annual adjustments to the contractor coefficients to adjust for inflation. Contractor coefficients shall remain the same for the duration of this contract (Base period and all option periods). Pricing for all “pre-priced” line items will be based on the bare cost for the task from the RS Means estimating system multiplied by the Weighted Average City Cost Code applicable to a given task order, multiplied by the Contractor’s coefficient. City cost codes for locations not specifically stated in the RS Means estimating system will be determined by mutual agreement between the contractor and the Contracting Officer.
COEFFICIENTS:
a. “Coefficient” means a numerical factor that represents costs (generally indirect costs) not considered to be included in RS Means cost data (e.g. general and administrative and other overhead costs, insurance costs, protective clothing, and also Contractor’s profit). Contingencies such as changes in wage rates and the effect of inflation in option years are NOT TO BE INCLUDED in the coefficient. Coefficients proposed by the Offeror are multiplied by the sum of all applicable unit prices in the RS Means estimating software multiplied by the weighted average city code to price each individual Task Order.
Example: Total RS Means cost X Weigted City Average X Coefficient
The coefficients proposed by the offeror and accepted by the Government are incorporated in to the IDC SATOC.
Updated versions of the RS Means estimating software will be incorporated on January 01 of each calendar year eliminating the requirement to make annual adjustments to the contractor’s coefficients.
b. The coefficient factors should include, but not be limited to, the items listed below, and all contingencies in connection therewith.
field and home office overhead for prime and subcontractors profit for prime and subcontractors taxes and workman’s compensation insurance costs all costs associated with bonding and alternative payment protection, including the bond premiums employee payroll taxes, insurance and fringe benefits protective clothing / equipment mobilization and close out for the total contract and each task order compliance with environmental laws (overhead {indirect} costs associated with performing work in compliance with EPA/OSHA regulations, including obtaining any necessary licenses and permits, reporting requirements, etc.)
compliance with protection and safety laws (i.e., safety rails, face and clothing protection, etc.)
project signs, traffic and work site signs and barriers daily and final cleanup daily quality control and reports operation and maintenance manuals (4 copies required on major equipment) moving furniture barricades for work site electricity, water, and restroom facilities not readily available at the project site.
all waste and excess material CAD and as-built drawings project management and supervision protection of and/or moving of government property quality control office management and equipment depreciation of mobile offices(s) interest associated with funding of equipment and payroll submittal preparation permits, licenses, and fees (Cost of RS Means software and Updates) other risks of doing business (i.e., risk of a lower than expected contract dollar value; risk of poor subcontractor performance and reperformance
c. All costs included in the Offeror’s coefficients should be fully identified in their cost proposal, as no allowance for change will be made after contract award.
d. Coefficients shall be carried out no further than two decimal places.
COEFFICIENT FACTORS:
a. Normal Working Hours - Offerors shall perform any or all functions during normal working hours, not in excess of 40 hours per week, in the quantities specified in individual task orders against this contract for the unit price sum specified in RS Means, multiplied by the applicable weighted average city cost code, multiplied by the coefficient factor.
b. Other Than Normal Working Hours - Offerors shall perform any or all functions called out in RS Means, during other than normal working hours which requires work to be performed in excess of 40 hours per week in quantities specified in individual task orders against this contract for the unit price sum specified in RS Means, multiplied by the applicable weighted average city cost code, multiplied by the coefficient factor.
c. "Non-prepriced" items - Items of work not supported by any RS Means pre-priced line items, but within the scope of work of an individual Task Order, may be incorporated into the task order cost as a non-prepriced (NPP) Line Item. Proposed NPP Item costs shall be reflected as raw Material/Equipment and/or, if applicable, installation cost only. NPP line items, as required by the contracting officer, shall be supported by a minimum of two competitive and verifiable written price quotes obtained from independent sources. NPP items shall also meet the regulatory requirements of AFARS 5117.9004-3(e)(2) and (3). Proposed cost of NPP line items are subject to negotiation by the Contracting Officer or his designated representative. NPP line items accepted by the Government will be paid at the raw material cost multiplied by a fixed rate not to exceed 10% in lieu of a coefficient or any other allowance for overhead or profit for the NPP item. Because the contractor’s NPP item cost reflects the raw material cost of the item it will not be subject to the weighted average city cost index. Repetitive NPP items may be negotiated and incorporated by modification to the contract, executed by the Contracting Officer.
NOTE: The contractor shall include in the price proposal a detailed description of the types of costs included in the coefficient factors.
SECTION 00 21 11
The following section describes the procedures for submittal of proposals in response to this Request for Proposal.
This project is will be solicited as a competitive 8(a) solicitation. The NAICS for this project is 237990, with a size standard of $39.5M, as determined by the U.S. Small Business Administration.
Where to Submit Bidder Inquiries:
A Request for Information (RFI) Review will be set up for this RFP in ProjNet.org. The Bidder Inquiry Key is XG8985-BCHY7Z. The review is open from 13 July 2020 – 23 July 2020. All questions and inquiries will be accepted only via the ProjNet website.
Where to Submit Proposals:
US Army Corps of Engineers ATTN: Contracting Division (Vonda S. Rogers) CESWL-CT 700 W. Capitol Avenue, RM 7315 Little Rock, AR 72201
All proposals must be marked on the outside as follows:
W9127S20R0008, SWL IDC SATOC Minor Construction Projects
“DO NOT OPEN”
Submission Deadline: Proposals shall be received by the Corps of Engineers no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of the Standard Form 1442 which is 05 Aug, 2020 2:00 PM Central.
Offeror is required to submit a bid guarantee with its proposal in the amount of 20% or $3,000,000.00, whichever is less.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform the requirements of the Statement of Work. The proposal should be specific and complete in every detail; and should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the requirements. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affects an Offeror's evaluation.
Proposals shall not exceed the page limits described. Provide all information in tabbed sections.
Appendices and/or attachments are not permitted and will not be evaluated.
SUBMISSION FORMAT
COVER SHEET & TABLE OF CONTENTS. Proposals shall consist of two (2) volumes. A cover sheet identifying the Offeror (name, address, point of contact) and solicitation number shall be provided. The second sheet shall be a table of contents. The proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents. Offers that violate these rules unnecessarily delay the evaluation process and may be rejected by the Government after the initial evaluation without receiving any further consideration. Neither the cover sheet nor the table of contents count toward the page limitations.
TABS. Written proposal materials shall be submitted in standard three ring loose-leaf binders.
Proposals shall be tabbed and labeled as specified in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents.
FONT SIZE. Shall not be less than 10 point. Pages will be double-sided and each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page.
SHEET SIZE. Shall be 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches; however, if drawings, charts, or other graphics are submitted, sheets no larger than 11 inches x 17 inches and folded to 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches shall be used. Sheets that are 11 x 17 inch will be counted as two 8-1/2 inch x 11-inch sheets. All sheets shall be dated and numbered.
PAGE LIMITS. The proposal shall not exceed the specified page limits. The Government will not review any information in excess of the page limits or information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the proposal. The Offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of this solicitation as part of their proposal. Offers that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection.
NUMBER OF COPIES. Offerors shall submit one (1) electronic copy (CD) of their non-price proposal (Volume 1); and one (1) electronic copy of their price proposal (Volume 2).
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Offerors shall submit their proposals in accordance with the following:
VOLUME 1:
TAB A - Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Data Sheet. (See the format provided as Attachment 1.) Proposal must include offeror’s telephone number, FAX number, email address, and DUNS number. DUNS number will be used to access CPARS Data.
TAB B - Factor 1 - Project Management TAB C - Factor 2 - Personnel Qualifications TAB D - Factor 3 - Experience TAB E - Factor 4 - Past Performance
VOLUME 2:
TAB A - Price Schedule TAB B - Offer Guarantee
FACTOR 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT (VOL 1, TAB B)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Page Limit - Twenty-four (24) Pages. Describe (via illustration and/or narrative) how your company will manage the contract and administer task orders. The proposal shall address the information below.
a) Management Plan. Describe how the contract and task orders will be implemented and managed. Describe simultaneous coordination of multiple subcontractors on concurrent projects at various locations, and of varying degrees of complexity. Describe procedures for providing sketches, plans, working drawings, and calculations.
b) Resourcing/Staffing Plan. Describe how the Offeror's corporate and on-site staff will interface with the Government. Describe the measures that will be taken by the Offeror's staff to ensure that response times and critical deadlines are met. Address how staff levels will adjust to accommodate variations in workload at different locations. Include type and number of staff positions to be utilized and responsibilities and contractual authority of proposed personnel.
c) Subcontractor Work Plan. Describe how the Offeror will utilize subcontractors/small business in performance of the contract while complying with FAR Clause 52.219-14 – Limitations on Subcontracting (Jan 2017). The Offeror shall describe its current capacity (or the workforce the Offeror intends to hire) and discuss why the prime cannot perform any work proposed to be subcontracted. The offeror shall state the percentage of work and dollar value of work to be performed by the prime and all proposed subcontractors as measured against 100% of the work as it applies to labor costs only. The offeror may also discuss previous successful performance of compliance with FAR Clause 52.219-14 and the use of subcontractors/small businesses.
d) Quality Control and Safety Plan. Describe quality control requirements and how the requirements of Occupational Safety Health Administration (OSHA) and EM 385-1-1 will be implemented and met. Describe what will be included in the Quality Control and Safety Plans, and how the Offeror proposes to insure that Quality Control and Safety Measures will be enforced. Describe the positions required to implement the Quality Control and Safety plans and the educational requirements, experience, and specialized training required for these positions.
NOTE: The Offeror is not required to submit a Quality Control Plan or Safety Plan as part of the proposal; but to describe how these plans will be implemented. The Quality Control Plan and the Safety Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Contracting Officer prior to issuance of the first task order.
EVALUATION CRITERIA - The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it:
a) Demonstrates the ability to coordinate multiple subcontractors on multiple projects at various locations, simultaneously.
b) Demonstrates the offeror has applied the right skill sets during the course of a given project in order to meet the requirements outlined in the Statement of Work.
c) Demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of internal and external communication protocols, roles and responsibilities.
d) Demonstrates the offeror has a formal process in place to control quality and safety throughout the course of the project; whether the offeror has implemented a process of checks and balances to meet the desired result.
FACTOR 2 - PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS (VOL 1, TAB C)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Page Limit - Eighteen (18) Pages. Provide a narrative listing the personnel required to administer the contract and subsequent task orders. Submit an organizational chart showing the relationship of project staff to corporate staff and clearly define the lines of responsibility of key personnel. Positions listed in the Offeror's proposal for required staffing must list the qualifying factors determined by the Offeror for the selection of employees filling the position. The proposal shall include the information below.
a) Key Personnel. Describe the key personnel required to administer the contract and subsequent task orders. Key personnel must be experienced with Job Order Contracting, or other indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract vehicles which utilize the issuance of multiple, concurrent task orders. Key personnel must be experienced with the development of cost proposals using RS Means Software. List the educational requirements, experience, and any specialized training required for each position. Provide a resume for each person proposed to fill the position, including the name, education, experience, and specialized training for that person.
b) Project Management Staff. Describe the project management staff required to implement the requirements the contract and subsequent task orders (other than the Quality Control and Safety Staff and Administrative Support Staff listed below). List the educational requirements, experience, and any specialized training required for each position. Provide a resume for each person proposed to fill the position, including the name, education, experience, and specialized training for that person.
c) Quality Control and Safety Staff. Describe the positions required to implement the Quality Control and Safety Plans. List the educational requirements, experience, and any specialized training required for each position. Provide a resume for each person proposed to fill the position, including the name, education, experience, and specialized training for that person.
d) Administrative Support Staff. Describe the Administrative Support Staff required to administer the contract and subsequent task orders. List the educational requirements, experience, and any specialized training required for each position. Provide a resume for each person proposed to fill the position, including the name, education, experience, and specialized training for that person.
NOTE: Substitution of the personnel submitted in the technical proposal after award must be approved by the Contracting Officer.
EVALUATION CRITERIA - The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it:
Evaluation of staffing will be performed on qualifying factors, not on the content of personal resumes. Resumes submitted for positions described in the Offeror's proposal will be reviewed only to verify that the qualifying factors are met. Failure of a personal resume to meet the Offeror’s qualifying factors for the position may result in an Unsatisfactory rating.
FACTOR 3 – EXPERIENCE (VOL 1, TAB D)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Page Limit - Eighteen (18) Pages. Submit project information for five (5) projects/task orders completed within the last five years that are similar in scope, costs, complexity, and duration to the task orders anticipated on this contract.
Information can include narratives, drawings, photos etc. Government and/or private sector projects may be included. All projects referenced shall provide location and description, point of contact information, project cost, and scope.
The Government will use the Offeror’s relevant experience to assess the Offeror’s probability of successfully performing the scope of work described in this solicitation. If the JV or teaming arrangement has little or no recent, relevant projects performed by the JV, then each member of the JV may provide a combined total of five projects. An Offeror representing the combining of two or more companies for the purpose of this RFP, must describe the nature of the association;
indicate whether the firms have experience working together in construction ventures, including how long and how many projects.
The Government will consider the experience of a parent/divisional office and/or an affiliate company, provided that the offeror submits a letter or memorandum detailing the resources (workforce, management, facilities, or other resources) that will be provided for this contract, and which demonstrates how said resources will be provided or relied upon by the offeror in its contract performance.
EVALUATION CRITERIA - Proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it:
a) Demonstrates the offeror has utilized Job Order or other IDIQ contracting processes utilizing the issuance of multiple/concurrent task orders in the last five years.
b) Demonstrates the offeror has the capability to accomplish multiple, concurrent projects being performed at multiple geographic locations.
c) Demonstrates the offeror has successfully completed projects of similar scope and complexity.
d) Demonstrates that the Offeror can manage multiple subcontractors.
FACTOR 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE (VOL 1, TAB E)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Page Limit - Twenty-five (25) Pages. Submit completed Past Performance Questionnaires (Form PPQ-O) (Attachment 2) from at least three (3) customers demonstrating past performance completed within the past five (5) years. The Government will use the information to determine the Offeror’s probability of successfully performing the scope of work described in this solicitation.
NOTE: Teaming arrangements and Joint Ventures. Provide a copy of the teaming/joint venture agreement. If required, JV approval must be obtained in accordance with Small Business Administration policy.
The Government will consider the past performance of a parent/divisional office and/or an affiliate company, provided that the offeror submits a letter or memorandum detailing the resources (workforce, management, facilities, or other resources) that will be provided for this contract, and which demonstrates how said resources will be provided or relied upon by the offeror in its contract performance.
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
The Government will evaluate how well the contractor performed on these contracts (See Past Performance Relevancy Ratings and Rating and Performance Confidence Assessments below).
The Government may contact sources other than those provided by the Offeror for information with respect to past performance. These other sources may include, but are not limited to, Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other databases; telephone interviews with organizations familiar with the Offeror’s performance, and Government personnel with personal knowledge of the Offeror’s performance capability.
COEFFICIENT FACTOR (VOL 2, TAB A)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Submit the required Coefficient Factor; submit a detailed description of the types of costs included in the proposed coefficient factors; provide aggregate construction bonding capacity.
EVALUATION CRITERIA: The Government will perform a price analysis after completion of technical evaluations. Price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, to determine completeness, reasonableness, and understanding of the work. The evaluation will determine the adequacy of the offer in fulfilling the requirements of the proposal. Completeness addresses the extent to which the elements of the price proposal are consistent with the requirements of the RFP. Reasonableness will be established using historical price information, price competition information, the IGE, and any other pricing tools necessary. A clear audit trail must be evident as to the conversion of costs to the coefficients to accomplish the tasks described herein. Price will not be rated, but will be a factor in making the final best value determination for award.
PRICE SCHEDULE (VOL 2, TAB A)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Submit the required Price Schedule for the seed project in RSMeans CostWorks format.
EVALUATION CRITERIA: The Government will perform a price analysis after completion of technical evaluations. Price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, to determine completeness, reasonableness, and understanding of the work. The evaluation will determine the adequacy of the offer in fulfilling the requirements of the proposal. Completeness addresses the extent to which the elements of the price proposal are consistent with the requirements of the RFP. Reasonableness will be established using historical price information, price competition information, the IGE, and any other pricing tools necessary. A clear audit trail must be evident as to the conversion of costs to the coefficients to accomplish the tasks described herein. Price will not be rated, but will be a factor in making the final best value determination for award.
RATING ADJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS
RATING ADJECTIVES
Outstanding - Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Good - Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
Acceptable - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Marginal - Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Unacceptable - Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable.
Proposal is unawardable.
DEFINITIONS
Clarifications. Limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated.
Communications. Exchanges, between the Government and offerors, after receipt of proposals, leading to establishment of the competitive range.
a. Offerors whose past performance information is the determining factor preventing them from being included in the competitive range. Such communications will address adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not had a prior opportunity to respond; and
b. Offerors (other than those discussed above) whose exclusion from or inclusion in the competitive range is uncertain.
c. Communications may be conducted to enhance Government understanding of proposals; allow reasonable interpretation of the proposal; or facilitate the Government’s evaluation process. Communications cannot be used to cure proposal deficiencies or material omissions, materially alter the technical or price elements of the proposal, and/or otherwise revise the technical or price elements of the proposal. Such communications may be considered in rating proposals for the purpose of establishing the competitive range, if required. Communications shall not provide an opportunity for the Offeror to revise their proposal, but may address ambiguities in the proposal or other concerns (e.g.
perceived deficiencies, weaknesses, errors, omissions, or mistakes and information relating to relevant past performance).
Discussions. Negotiations conducted in a competitive acquisition. Discussions take place after establishment of the competitive range.
Deficiency - A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.
Strength - An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.
Significant Strength - A significant strength appreciably enhances the merit of a proposal or appreciably increases the probability of successful contract performance.
Weakness - A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.
Significant Weakness - A significant weakness in a proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.
Uncertainty - Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission or mistake).
Clarification - Limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated.
PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS
In performing the past performance evaluation, evaluators will apply the following relevance levels to assess the relevance of the prior contract effort(s) of offerors.
Very Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant - Present /past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
RATING AND PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS
The government will evaluate past performance information to determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance confidence assessment. Each offeror will be assigned one of the ratings below for past performance.
Substantial Confidence - Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence - Base on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Limited Confidence - Base on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence -Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown Confidence (Neutral) - No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offero may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past perfomance.
TECHNICAL EVALUATION WEIGHTS
For the purpose of this evaluation, the following terms will be used to establish the relative importance of the technical factors:
More Important: The criterion is greater in value than another criterion.
Equal: The criterion is of the same value or nearly the same as another criterion.
Less Important: The criterion is less in value than another criterion.
Weight among technical factors:
Factor 1 - Project Management -This Factor is Equal in Importance to Factor 4, and More Important than Factors 2 and 3, and Price.
Factor 2 - Personnel Qualifications - This Factor is Less Important than Factors 1 and 4, and more important than Factor 3 and Price.
Factor 3 - Experience - This Factor is Less Important than Factors 1, 2, and 4, and more important than Price.
Factor 4 - Past Performance - This Factor is Equal in Importance to Factor 1, and More Important than Factors 2 and 3, and Price.
Price - Price is less important than Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Section 00 21 00 - Instructions
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996)
(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.
(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier's check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States.
The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds, (1) to unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids, and (2) to the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.-
(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20% or $3,000,000.00, or whichever is less.
(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.-
(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.
(End of provision)
Section 00 70 00 - Conditions of the Contract
CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE
The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.
MINIMUM
QUANTITY
MINIMUM
AMOUNT
MAXIMUM
QUANTITY
MAXIMUM
AMOUNT
15,000.00 $15,000.00 4,000,000.00 $72,500,000.00
DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE
The minimum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.
MINIMUM
QUANTITY
MINIMUM
AMOUNT
MAXIMUM
QUANTITY
MAXIMUM
15,000.00 $15,000.00 4,000,000.00 $72,500,000.00
CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE
The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.
CLIN
MINIMUM
QUANTITY
MINIMUM
AMOUNT
MAXIMUM
QUANTITY
MAXIMUM
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS
Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:
CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY
0001 Destination Government Destination Government 1001 Destination Government Destination Government 2001 Destination Government Destination Government 3001 Destination Government Destination Government
Section 00 72 00 - General Conditions
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees MAY 2014 52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government SEP 2006 52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures MAY 2014 52.203-8 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or
Improper Activity
MAY 2014
52.203-10 Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity MAY 2014 52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal
Transactions
OCT 2010
52.203-13 Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct OCT 2015 52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement
To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights
APR 2014
52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper
MAY 2011
52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2016 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and
Certifications.
DEC 2014
52.204-21 Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems
JUN 2016
52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.
DEC 2019
52.204-25 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.
AUG 2019
52.204-26 Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services-- Representation.
DEC 2019
52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment
OCT 2015
52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters
OCT 2018
52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations
NOV 2015
52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.215-2 Audit and Records--Negotiation OCT 2010 52.215-10 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data AUG 2011 52.215-11 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data--
Modifications
AUG 2011
52.215-12 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data OCT 2010 52.215-13 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data--Modifications OCT 2010 52.215-15 Pension Adjustments and Asset Reversions OCT 2010 52.215-19 Notification of Ownership Changes OCT 1997 52.215-21 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data
Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data -- Modifications
OCT 2010
52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns OCT 2018 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting JAN 2017 52.222-1 Notice To The Government Of Labor Disputes FEB 1997 52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003
52.222-4 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards - Overtime Compensation
MAY 2018
52.222-6 Construction Wage Rate Requirements AUG 2018 52.222-7 Withholding of Funds MAY 2014 52.222-8 Payrolls and Basic Records AUG 2018 52.222-9 Apprentices and Trainees JUL 2005 52.222-10 Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements FEB 1988 52.222-11 Subcontracts (Labor Standards) MAY 2014 52.222-12 Contract Termination-Debarment MAY 2014 52.222-13 Compliance With Construction Wage Rate Requirements and
Related Regulations
MAY 2014
52.222-14 Disputes Concerning Labor Standards FEB 1988 52.222-15 Certification of Eligibility MAY 2014 52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities APR 2015 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity SEP 2016 52.222-27 Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for
Construction
APR 2015
52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans OCT 2015 52.222-36 Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities JUL 2014 52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans FEB 2016 52.222-40 Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor
Relations Act
DEC 2010
52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons JAN 2019 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification OCT 2015 52.222-55 Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 DEC 2015 52.223-1 Biobased Product Certification MAY 2012 52.223-2 Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts
SEP 2013
52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information MAY 2011 52.223-6 Drug-Free Workplace MAY 2001 52.223-15 Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming Products DEC 2007 52.223-17 Affirmative Procurement of EPA-Designated Items in Service and Construction Contracts
AUG 2018
52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While Driving
AUG 2011
52.223-20 Aerosols JUN 2016 52.223-21 Foams JUN 2016 52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008 52.226-1 Utilization Of Indian Organizations And Indian-Owned
Economic Enterprises
JUN 2000
52.227-1 Authorization and Consent DEC 2007 52.227-2 Notice And Assistance Regarding Patent And Copyright
Infringement
DEC 2007
52.227-4 Patent Indemnity-Construction Contracts DEC 2007 52.228-2 Additional Bond Security OCT 1997 52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.228-11 Pledges Of Assets AUG 2018 52.228-12 Prospective Subcontractor Requests for Bonds MAY 2014 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds--Construction OCT 2010 52.229-3 Federal, State And Local Taxes FEB 2013 52.229-4 Federal, State, And Local Taxes (State and Local
Adjustments)
FEB 2013
52.232-5 Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts MAY 2014 52.232-17 Interest MAY 2014 52.232-23 Assignment Of Claims MAY 2014 52.232-27 Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts JAN 2017
52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award Management
OCT 2018
52.232-36 Payment by Third Party MAY 2014 52.232-37 Multiple Payment Arrangements MAY 1999 52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business
Subcontractors
DEC 2013
52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014 52.236-2 Differing Site Conditions APR 1984 52.236-3 Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work APR 1984 52.236-4 Physical Data APR 1984 52.236-5 Material and Workmanship APR 1984 52.236-6 Superintendence by the Contractor APR 1984 52.236-7 Permits and Responsibilities NOV 1991 52.236-8 Other Contracts APR 1984 52.236-9 Protection of Existing Vegetation, Structures, Equipment, Utilities, and Improvements
APR 1984
52.236-10 Operations and Storage Areas APR 1984 52.236-11 Use and Possession Prior to Completion APR 1984 52.236-12 Cleaning Up APR 1984 52.236-13 Accident Prevention NOV 1991 52.236-14 Availability and Use of Utility Services APR 1984 52.236-16 Quantity Surveys APR 1984 52.236-17 Layout of Work APR 1984 52.236-21 Alt I Specifications and Drawings for Construction (Feb 1997) -
Alternate I
APR 1984
52.236-26 Preconstruction Conference FEB 1995 52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.242-14 Suspension of Work APR 1984 52.243-4 Changes JUN 2007 52.243-6 Change Order Accounting APR 1984 52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Items AUG 2019 52.246-12 Inspection of Construction AUG 1996 52.246-21 Warranty of Construction MAR 1994 52.248-3 Value Engineering-Construction OCT 2015 52.249-1 Alt I Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed-price) (Short Form) (Apr 1984) - Alternate I
APR 1984
52.249-2 Alt I Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed- Price) (Apr 2012) - Alternate I
SEP 1996
52.249-10 Default (Fixed-Price Construction) APR 1984 52.251-1 Government Supply Sources APR 2012 252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD
Officials
SEP 2011
252.203-7001 Prohibition On Persons Convicted of Fraud or Other Defense- Contract-Related Felonies
DEC 2008
252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7003 Agency Office of the Inspector General AUG 2019 252.203-7004 Display of Hotline Posters AUG 2019 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD
Officials
NOV 2011
252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information OCT 2016 252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber
Incident Reporting
DEC 2019
252.204-7018 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services
DEC 2019
252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991 252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By
The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism
MAY 2019
252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities DEC 2017 252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013 252.236-7000 Modification Proposals-Price Breakdown DEC 1991 252.236-7002 Obstruction of Navigable Waterways DEC 1991 252.236-7006 Cost Limitation JAN 1997 252.236-7007 Additive or Deductive Items DEC 1991 252.236-7008 Contract Prices-Bidding Schedules DEC 1991 252.236-7013 Requirement for Competition Opportunity for American Steel
Producers, Fabricators,…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .