Solicitation.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
Army Mechanical MATOC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9127S18R6029
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Little Rock

About this file

This document is a request for proposals for an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity multiple award task order contract for mechanical infrastructure repairs for the Army Medical Command. The contract will have a shared capacity of $45 million over a three-year base ordering period. Projects will typically involve restoration and modernization of HVAC, medical gas, plumbing, electrical, elevators, building envelope, fire protection, and interior and exterior site systems in existing patient care facilities ranging in size from 10,000 square feet or more. Project costs will typically range from $300,000 to $5 million. The solicitation will utilize a two-phase design-build selection process and is set aside for small businesses. Phase one proposals are due by March 16, 2018 and should demonstrate experience, qualifications, and past performance. Phase two will require technical and price proposals for an initial seed task order. The contract will be awarded on a best value basis to responsible offerors.

Solicitation W9127S18R6029

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Army Mechanical MATOC, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_2.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Proposal_Data_Sheet_W9127S18R6029.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ARMY MECHANICAL INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIRS (MIR), Multiple Aw ard Task Order Contract (MATOC)

$45 Million shared capacity.

Guaranteed Minimum is $10,000 at the end of the three year performance period.

Bidder Inquiry Key for questions is 2XYFW2-GMWP8X.

PHASE ONE PROPOSAL DUE DATE IS FRIDAY, MARCH 16, 2018. 2:00pm CST

VICKEY J POLSON 501-340-1279

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

14-Feb-2018

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________0 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________5 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

W9127S

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

(hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

(501) 324-5196FAX:TEL: (501) 340-5720 TEL: FAX:

W9127S18R6029 93

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00 01 10 - Table of Contents

Section 00 11 00 CLIN Schedule

Section 00 21 00 Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors

Section 00 22 10 Phase 1 Proposal Submission Requirements, Evaluation Criteria and Selection Criteria

Section 00 22 20 Phase 2 Proposal Submission Requirements, Evaluation Criteria and Basis of Award

Section 00 45 00 Representations and Certifications

Section 00 72 00 Contract Clauses

Section 00 73 10 Supplemental Contract Requirements

Section 00 73 46 Wage Determination Schedule (Phase 2 based on location)

Section 01 10 00 Performance Work Schedule (Phase 2)

Attachments:

1 – Proposal Data Sheet

Section 00 11 00 - SF1442 and CLIN Schedule

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 Job 3-Year Base Period MATOC

FFP

Work multiple building infrastructure restoration, repair and replacement projects concurrently in existing Army Medical facilities in CONUS, efficiently and complete these projects on schedule. Work may include restoration and/or modernization of HVAC, medical gas, plumbing, electrical, elevators, building envelope, fire protection, interior renovation, terrorism/force protection, and exterior site and systems work such as utilities infrastructure, roadways, sidewalks, parking lots, landscaping, irrigation, etc. Period of Performance for the base period is 36 months.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions, Conditions & Notices to Offerors

INSTRUCTIONS & NOTICES

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, & NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.0 DECRIPTION OF THE PROGRAM

2.0 GENERAL PROCEDURES/REQUIREMENTS

3.0 INTRODUCTION NOTICE TO OFFERORS

4.0 PREPARING PROPOSALS

5.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

6.0 SUMMARY

1.0 DECRIPTION OF THE PROGRAM

This acquisition is a 100% Small Business (SB) set-aside firm-fixed price (FFP) indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ), multiple award task order contract (MATOC), for design-build (DB) construction services. This MATOC is for various facilities in support of US Army Medical Command (MEDCOM) medical sustainment, restoration and modernization (MSRM) program with capacity of $45 million. The contract duration will be for a base ordering period of three (3) years. Projects under this MATOC will typically be in existing patient care facilities. This often requires design and construction in coordination with existing utilities, facility systems, facility functions and patient care.

Typical project requirements will provide 1) mechanical, 2) electrical, 3) plumbing infrastructure support, and/or 4) ancillary support systems for healthcare related facilities with a square footage size in excess of 10,000 sq. ft. Project costs will typically range between $300,000 to $5 million. The NAICS code is 238220 and the small business size standard is $15 million.

This Small Business (SB) Design Build (DB) construction MIR MATOC will be procured through a two phase design-build selection procedures as a request for proposal (RFP) with a total small business (SB) set aside will be limited to eligible SB firms capable of participating in the CONUS, AK and HI locations, US Territories and US Possessions.

2.0 GENERAL PROCEDURES/REQUIREMENTS

PRELIMINARY REVIEW

Proposals shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform the requirements of the Solicitation.

Proposals should be specific and complete in every detail; and should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the requirements. Proposals should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. The price proposals will be separated from the technical proposals. Technical proposals will be provided to the designated Technical Evaluation Team and price proposals will be provided to the designated Price Evaluation Advisors, with both teams under the direct guidance and oversight of the Contracting Officer. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror's evaluation.

3.0 INTRODUCTION NOTICE TO OFFERORS

This section is designed to provide the offeror with instructions to complete and deliver a complete competitive proposal in response to this request for proposals (RFP). Oral proposals are not solicited for

Phase one (1). The selection procedures to be used will be a two-phase approached IAW FAR Subpart

36.3. The two-phase selection procedure authorized under 10 U.S.C. 2305a allows Offerors to submit information related to specialized experience, technical competence, capability to perform, past performance, teaming arrangements and/or other information requested in Phase 1. Based on information submitted in Phase 1, the Source Selection Authority (SSA) will select Three (3) to Five (5) (unlessw more offerors are justified) of the most qualified Offerors to advance onto Phase two (2) in the competition and are subsequently invited to submit technical design products as part of the technical proposals for evaluation during Phase 2. All proposals must be complete and timely to be considered.

W9127S18R6029

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Acquisition Method:

The method of acquisition for this procurement considers the “Best Value” continuum, wherein a Best Value source selection process will be utilized in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 15.101.

Award will be made to the proposal that represents the best value to the Government as determined by the Source Selection Official. In this acquisition method, evaluation and price trade off, if conducted, are highly subjective in nature. The proposal determined to be the Best Value may not be the lowest price or the highest technically rated proposal. The decision will involve a comparison and trade-off analysis of the combination of non-cost strengths, weaknesses, and risks, the evaluated cost/price offered in each proposal, and judgment as to which proposal provides the best combination. As a result Offerors must provide their best proposal with all required information in the required format. Information provided must be complete, clear and legible to obtain the best evaluation rating possible.

Contract Cost Ceiling Limitation for Design and Construction Costs:

The design and construction costs will be subject to the funds available for each Task Order. The current capacity for the design and construction cost for this three (3) year base MATOC is $45M.

The total MATOC award shall not exceed the anticipated capacity amount of $45M for this contract. Offerors are notified that they are under no obligation to approach this ceiling. The Government will track capacity availability in order not to exceed the $45M.

The solicitation process is known as the “Request for Proposals” or the acronym: “RFP”. Interested firms or joint venture entities (referred to as “Offerors”) may submit certain specified performance capability proposals, demonstrating their capability to successfully execute the contract resulting from this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein.

The Government will evaluate the proposals, in accordance with the criteria described in Section 00 21 00 in the solicitation (and below, Evaluating Factors for Award), and award a firm-fixed-price design-build MIR construction contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government considering all factors and price. Price will not be rated, but will be evaluated for reasonableness.

The proposal must describe the capability of the Offeror to perform the work, describe the Offeror’s understanding of the requirements contained in the solicitation and set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by the Request for Proposals (RFP). The proposal should be prepared simply and economically in the prescribed format and be complete, legible, clear and coherent.

The Government included Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors, in this RFP. This clause states that the Government intends to make award based on initial offers, but reserves the right to conduct discussions with all Offerors determined to be part of the competitive range or those being selected to continue to Phase 2, should the Source Selection Authority deem discussions necessary.

Oral Presentations:

The Government may conduct oral presentations after selection of Phase 2 Offerors. Location, assigned dates and times for each potential offeror will be provided at a later date if it is determined oral presentations are necessary.

Offerors will not be participating in a sealed bid procurement process under this acquisition method. Issuance of this Request for Proposal does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government.

Contract Type:

An award of a firm-fixed-price design-build construction contract requiring delivery and installation is contemplated for this Acquisition.

4.0 PREPARING PROPOSALS

Proposal submittal information is located in each phase section (00 22 10 & 00 22 20).

5.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

Submit proposals initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that firms will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals. Submit proposals in tabbed, three-ring binders. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

6.0 SUMMARY

6.1 Project Title: Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), US Army MEDCOM Medical Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (MSRM) Program

6.2 Location: Contiguous United States (CONUS), Alaska (AK) and Hawaii (HI), US Territories and US Possessions

6.3 Proposed Contract Type: Multiple Award Task Order Contract Firm Fixed price.

6.4 Design-Build: Yes

6.5 Source Selection Process: Best Value, Trade-Off, IAW FAR 15.101-1

6.6 Firms Which Can Submit Proposals: The RFP is Small Business Set-Aside

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES are to be sent to the Contract Specialist identified as:

Vickey Polson U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Email: vickey.j.polson@usace.army.mil Address: P.O. Box 867, Room 7315, Little Rock, AR 72203-0867

BIDDER INQUIRIES: Offerors may submit written bidder inquiries in the web-based system ProjNet. Formal responses to ProjNet will be provided in the form of an amendment. Any question or response not answered in the form of an amendment is not considered part of the contract. ProjNet for this project will be closed 10 calendar days prior to proposal due date. The Bidder Inquiry Key is 2XYFW2-GMWP8X.

BID GUARANTEE: The provision at FAR 52.228-1 does not apply to the submission of Phase 1 Proposals. Bid guarantees will only be required of those most highly qualified firms submitting Phase 2 Proposals.

SITE VISIT: A formal site visit will be scheduled and communicated to those most highly qualified offerors selected to submit Phase 2 Proposals.

EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE: In accordance with the provisions of Subpart 36.201 (Evaluation of Contractor Performance) of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), construction contractor’s performance shall be evaluated throughout the performance of the contract. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) follows the procedures outlined in Engineering Regulation 415-1-17 to fulfill this FAR requirement.

For construction contracts awarded at or above $100,000.00, the USACE will evaluate contractor’s performance and prepare a performance report using the Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS), which is now a web-based system.

After an evaluation (interim or final) is written up by the USACE, the contractor will have the ability to access, review and comment on the evaluation for a period of 30 days.

Accessing and using CCASS requires specific software, called PKI certification, which is installed on the user’s computer. The certification is a Department of Defense requirement and was implemented to provide security in electronic transactions. The certification software could cost approximately $110 - $125 per certificate per year and is purchased from an External Certificate Authorities (ECA) vendor. Current information about the PKI certification process and for contacting vendors can be found on the web site: http://www.cpars.csd.disa.mil/. If the Contractor wishes to participate in the performance evaluation process, access to CCASS and PKI certification is the sole responsibility of the Contractor.

CONTRACT OMBUDSMAN: In accordance with FAR 16.505(b)(6) and AFARS 5116.505(b)(6) the following is identified as Task Order Ombudsman:

Ms. Jacqueline C. Woodson Acquisition Support Division U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 7701 Telegraph Road, Casey Building, Room 2115 Alexandria, VA 22315 Phone: 703-428-6323 Email: jacqueline.c.woodson@usace.army.mil

INSTRUCTIONS- As-built drawings and verifications:

Government will provide as-built drawings that are available on the various systems to aide in preparation of proposals, but during the engineering design post award, contractor must validate the accuracy of the government provided drawings and technical documents. The contractor’s final design shall be developed primarily on the actual conditions found during the designer’s post award investigative site visits.

The testing and confirmation of all materials to be disturbed, prior to disturbing the material shall be the responsibility of the contractor. The government shall make available any available past test reports and findings concerning potentially hazardous materials and any abatements performed. Asbestos, lead-based paint, mercury or any other health hazards or environmentally unsafe chemicals which require abatement, will be the responsibility of the contractor. And any required abatement will be incorporated in the contractors’ proposal.

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 3 yrs. ADC CONTRACTING DIVISION

VICKEY J POLSON

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

501-340-1279 FOB: Destination

W9127S

Section 00 22 10 - Phase 1 of a 2 Phase Design Build Selection Process

PHASE 1

PHASE 1 - SUBMISSION FORMAT

COVER SHEET & TABLE OF CONTENTS. Phase 1 Proposals shall consist of one volume. A cover sheet identifying the Offeror (name, address, point of contact) and solicitation number shall be provided. The second sheet shall be a table of contents. The proposals shall contain a detailed table of contents. Offers that violate these rules unnecessarily delay the evaluation process and may be rejected by the Government after the initial evaluation without receiving any further consideration. Neither the cover sheet nor the table of contents count toward the page limitations.

TABS. Written proposal materials shall be submitted in standard three ring loose-leaf binders. Proposals shall be tabbed and labeled as specified in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents.

FONT SIZE. Shall not be less than 10 point font size.

SHEET SIZE. Shall be 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches; however, if drawings, charts, or other graphics are submitted, sheets no larger than 11 inches x 17 inches and folded to 8- 1/2 inches x 11 inches shall be used. Sheets that are 11 x 17 inch will be counted as two 8-1/2 inch x 11-inch sheets. All sheets shall be dated and numbered.

A sheet refers to a physical piece of paper for printed hard copies. A double sided sheet refers to paper that is printed on front side and back side. Page refers to a unit of content that may be shown on a monitor electronically or printed for hard copy on a sheet of paper. An 8 ½ x11 sheet of paper contains one (1) page of content if printed only on one side, or two (2) pages of content if printed front and back. An 11x17 sheet of paper may be printed on one side only and counts as 2 pages of content.

PAGE LIMITS. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page.

The proposal shall not exceed the specified page limits. The Government may not review any information in excess of the page limits or information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the proposal. The Offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of this solicitation as part of their proposal. Offers that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection.

NUMBER OF COPIES. Offerors shall submit an original hard copy in a binder and five (5) electronic copies (CDs) for the proposal.

Proposal Submission Requirements, Evaluation Criteria and Basis of Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple-Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC) for Mechanical Repairs for Army Medical Command (MEDCOM)

PHASE 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform the program requirements. The proposal should be specific and complete in every detail; and should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the requirements. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government.

Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror's evaluation.

Proposals in Phase 1 shall not include any cost information and shall not exceed the page limits described. Provide all information in tabbed sections. Neither appendices nor attachments are permitted and will not be evaluated. The program requirements reflect the disciplines that are historically common in projects throughout the Mechanical

MEDCOM

MSRM program but vary from project to project.

No technical designs, prices/costs or detailed technical illustrations are required or requested and will not be evaluated.

Technical Proposal

TAB A - FACTOR 1: Management Plan

TAB B - FACTOR 2: Specialized Experience

TAB C - FACTOR 3: Personnel Qualifications

TAB D – FACTOR 4: Past Performance

Factor 1: Management Plan

Offeror’s Submission Requirements: Total max of 12-pages, for all information provided in this factor. This maximum includes photos, drawings, schematics, and narrative.

11x17, fold-in drawings are allowed but single-side only and counts as two pages.

Management Plan - The offeror will demonstrate the approach to managing the MEDCOM Mechanical design-build program Contiguous United States (CONUS), Alaska (AK) and Hawaii (HI), US Territories and US Possessions. The narrative will describe how your company will manage multiple subcontractors/consultants/projects at various geographically separate/remote locations, concurrently issued under the contract. Narrative shall include a description of the team’s structure to include organizational flow chart, responsibilities and lines of authority established for the contract, and how the design and construction process and quality control shall be managed including the coordination of designers, trade subcontractors and construction personnel.

Considerations may include construction schedule, cost control, administrative processes and risk management. The following description is provided as a Prototypical Mechanical Repairs Project Scenario.

Prototypical Mechanical Repairs Project Scenario Existing hospital is experiencing problems providing proper temperature, ventilation, and humidity for their Pharmacy, Laboratory, and Radiology Areas. These areas are on the first floor of a three story wing of the hospital that was partially renovated 10 years ago. AHU-1 serves the Pharmacy and some adjacent administrative areas and is 20 years old. The ductwork distribution system was replaced in the prior renovation 10 years ago along with some pneumatic controls, but the AHU was not. AHU-2 serves the Laboratory, six adjacent Exam Rooms and ancillary spaces, and the Medical Records Area. It also is 20 years old and was not replaced in prior renovation, but duct distribution, DDC controls and new chilled water piping was added. AHU-3 serves the Radiology Area and the Hospital Logistics Suite. This unit is 10 years old and is rooftop mounted on the single story portion of this wing that was added during the renovations 10 years ago. The ductwork distribution for AHU-3 and DDC controls for the Radiology and Logistics were installed with the new building addition 10 years ago.

All HVAC systems are medium pressure ducts with VAV boxes and hot water reheat coils. Chilled water and hot water are supplied to all AHU’s from a central plant. AHU- 1 and AHU-2 are centrally located in a Mechanical Room on the second floor. This Mechanical Room is directly above first floor Admin Areas and below Central Sterile on third floor.

The Offerors shall describe in a narrative form, for this specific scenario, what factors and risks they would consider in analyzing the problems, designing proposed solutions, and implementing these solutions while maintaining uninterrupted hospital operations.

Evaluation Criteria – This factor will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it:

Demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of team structure and approach required for management and execution of infrastructure renovations/repairs in active healthcare facilities during continuous hospital/clinical operations.

Demonstrates the ability and capacity to effectively manage multiple projects, on-going projects with multiple subcontractors/consultants at various geographically separate/remote locations, including design effort and how effective control, safety, quality, timeliness and oversight will be maintained, simultaneously.

Describes the integration of the design and construction firms, the staff during design and construction and the effectiveness of the configuration management system to control and track revisions to the design, both before and during construction.

Describes the process for identification and evaluation of risks within the offeror’s control and the plan for mitigating each risk which may include but not limited to, cost control, schedule and administrative processes.

Demonstrates understanding of contractually required lines of authority and responsibilities for quality control personnel and the quality control processes for both design and construction.

Factor 2: Specialized Experience

Offeror’s Submission Requirements: Total max of 14- pages, for all information provided in this factor. This maximum includes photos, drawings, schematics, and narrative.

11x17, fold-in drawings are allowed but single-side only and counts as two pages.

Provide a narrative listing four (4) projects, with a minimum of three in an active inpatient Healthcare facility that were completed within the last six years. The narrative should address these Salient Characteristics for each project:

Type of facility to include:

The functions of the space within the project area or served by the mechanical systems.

Any facility operational issues that effected design and construction and how you addressed them.

Scope of mechanical work, including:

a) Extent of design, demolition, and refit.

b) Specific mechanical issues to be addressed and/or specific HVAC concerns regarding scope or space served by equipment.

a) The constructed solution to those issues.

b) Required coordination and integration with other facility utilities and systems, especially electrical and fire protection.

c) Project HVAC Controls and communications requirements, tie to a-d above as appropriate.

d) Any commissioning requirements.

All projects referenced shall provide location and description, owner contact information, project cost, scope, award amount and final price, and major departments affected by the renovation. The projects provided in the narrative must demonstrate performance throughout the entire project value range from $300K to $5M. Where the Offeror is coming together as a Joint Venture or teaming arrangement and has not worked together, provide a narrative listing of four (4) projects completed within the last six years for each firm. They shall have been involved in the project from design through project closeout. The projects provided in the narrative must demonstrate performance throughout the entire project value range from $300K to $5M. However, at least one (1) project must be in value in excess of $2M. Information can include narratives, drawings, photos etc.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The proposal will be evaluated for the overall team’s specialized experience. The Offeror shall demonstrate the ability to have:

Experience in performing the Salient Characteristics as outlined in above description.

Experience in active healthcare facilities during continuous hospital/clinical operations of similar size and complexity to those which will be performed under this contract.

Experience in projects throughout the entire value range from $300K to $5M, with at least one project at a value of greater than $2M.

Experience in managing multiple projects simultaneously at active healthcare facilities.

Factor 3: Personnel Qualifications

Offeror’s Submission Requirements: Total max of 12 pages for all information provided in this factor. This maximum includes photos, drawings, schematics, and narrative.

11x17, fold-in drawings are allowed but single-side only and counts as two pages.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Provide a narrative listing of key personnel required for a typical project and why they are qualified to manage the program. The proposal shall include the information below. Provide a resume (no more than one page each, no SF330s) for the following key personnel:

Program Manager. This individual shall have a minimum of 15-years’ experience in the construction industry with a minimum of 5 years’ of this experience in healthcare design and construction. The individual shall be familiar and conversant with the various codes and standards applicable to medical facilities and the tasks covered under this scope of work. The Contractor shall execute the work under the direction of a Contractor’s Program Manager approved by the CO. All work shall be accomplished with adequate internal controls and review procedures with a goal to eliminate conflicts, errors and omissions, and ensure the technical accuracy of all output. The Program Manager shall serve as the single Point of Contact and liaison between the Contracting Officer and the Prime Contractor for all on‐going work, and shall oversee the program/project(s) from project conception through acceptance. The individual has direct responsibility for all the projects awarded to his/her company under the contract. They shall remain engaged on the project for the duration.

Project Managers (provide a resume for 2 project managers). This individual shall have a minimum of 10-years’ experience in the construction industry with a minimum of 5 years of this experience in healthcare design and construction industry. The Project Manager shall have supervisory experience in government contract project work, and shall be able to conclusively demonstrate these qualifications. The Project Manager shall be able to demonstrate experience in healthcare renovation projects from commencement of design to project close out. The Contractor shall execute the work under the direction of a Contractor’s Project Manager (PM) who will report to the Program Manager. The Project Manager shall be responsible for the overall management and coordination of the task order and shall be the central point of daily contact with the Government for performance of all work under the task order including warranty requirements. They shall have an intimate working knowledge of the project requirements and design and construction issues. The Project Manager shall oversee delivery accomplishment, administer all instructions and answer all questions from the Contracting Officer during the life of the contract.

Architect/Engineer of Record. This individual shall be responsible for the overall preparation of design plans and specifications for the project and responsible for completing all design work. This individual shall have a minimum of 5‐years’ experience in the healthcare design and construction industry, and a minimum of 10‐years in the general industry. They shall have performed in the capacity as “Designer of Record” for a minimum of 5-years. They shall be an expert healthcare design professional, knowledgeable and experienced in project sequencing and understand how sophisticated medical systems are integrated. These individuals shall also have a demonstrated, relevant, understanding and experience in healthcare codes, criteria, guidelines, and standards related to their discipline. Knowledge of and experience with Anti- Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) is required. Individuals shall have a complete understanding of work typical of the MATOC’s scope and shall be able to effectively coordinate all subordinate design elements in the preparation of detailed and compliant plans and specifications. Design shall be accomplished with adequate internal controls and review procedures that will eliminate conflicts, errors and omissions, and ensure the technical accuracy of all designs. All contractor-completed drawings and specifications shall be properly stamped and sealed.

The Designer of Record shall be either a Registered Architect or Registered Engineer.

Civil/Structural Engineer. This individual shall have a minimum of 3‐years’ experience in the healthcare design and construction industry, and a minimum of 5‐years in the general industry. The engineer shall be licensed and/or registered in their discipline.

They shall be knowledgeable and experienced in project sequencing and have a background in existing site/structure investigation, building and design codes, and renovation work as well as new construction. These individuals shall also have a demonstrated understanding and experience in healthcare codes, criteria, guidelines, and standards related to their discipline. Knowledge of and experience with Anti‐ Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) is required Individuals shall have a complete understanding of their disciplines, specifically:

Civil and site systems design & installation – site planning, parking, storm water runoff, site utilities, grading, landscaping, and other factors influencing the design of medical and campuses.

Structural systems design & installation – foundation and framing design, lateral reinforcing, AT/FP requirements, support for major pieces of medical equipment and other aspects of structura design.

Electrical Engineer. This individual shall have a minimum of 3-years’ experience in the healthcare design and construction industry, and a minimum of 5-years in the general industry. They shall be knowledgeable and experienced in project sequencing and understand design and construction requirements pertinent to medical facility-related electrical and low voltage systems and their integration. The engineer shall be licensed and/or registered in their discipline. These individuals shall also have a demonstrated understanding and experience in healthcare codes, criteria, guidelines, and standards related to their discipline. Knowledge of and experience with Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) is required. Individuals shall have a complete understanding of their disciplines, specifically: Electrical systems design & installation – normal and emergency interior and exterior lightning, normal and emergency interior and exterior power systems, electrical equipment, powered medical equipment, cathodic and lightning protection, and their interface within and with other systems.

Mechanical Engineer. This individual shall have a minimum of 3-years’ experience in the healthcare design and construction industry, and a minimum of 5-years in the general industry. These individuals shall also have a demonstrated understanding and experience in healthcare codes, criteria, guidelines, and standards related to their discipline. The engineer shall be licensed and/or registered in their discipline.

Knowledge of and experience with Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) is required. They shall be knowledgeable and experienced in project sequencing and understand design and construction requirements pertinent to medical facility-related work, specifically:

Mechanical system design & installation, testing and certification - heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration, direct digital controls, building energy use simulation, major energy plant equipment, and their interface with other systems.

Plumbing systems design and installation – medical & dental gas, compressed air, vacuum, high pressure/clean steam, domestic water, sanitary drainage systems, storm water systems, fuel gas systems, fire suppression systems and their interface with other systems.

Fire Protection Engineer (FPE). This individual shall have a minimum of 3-years’ experience in the healthcare design and construction industry, and a minimum of 5‐ years in the general industry. The FPE is an integral part of the design team and shall be actively involved in every aspect of the design as it relates to fire protection as opposed to just consulting/reviewing. The FPE shall be a Registered Professional Engineer who has passed the Fire Protection Engineering written examination administered by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveys (NCEES), or a Registered PE in a related Engineering discipline. The FPE shall have experience in Fire protection, detection and suppression design & installation – alarms, digital controls, sprinkler ring, NFPA, alarms, mass notification and monitoring.

Safety Manager. This individual shall be directly responsible for the safety program and site safety. This individual shall also have a minimum of 5-years’ experience in the construction industry with a minimum of 3 years ‘of this experience in positions with a specific Safety component of performance. A working knowledge of Federal and Army safety requirements including OSHA and Corps of Engineers Safety Manual EM385-1- 1 shall be demonstrated. In addition, see Section 6.0 Safety below for further requirements and limitations on staffing. Task Order-specific Safety Officer Requirements (if any) will be stated in Attachment A – Performance Objectives and shall take precedence over the PWS. Specific training requirements for the Safety Representative are contained in the Safety Manual EM385-1-1 and may be dependent upon the project scope. Many Task Orders are expected to permit dual-hatting the Safety Officer with another position.

However, in order to do so, specific safety training requirements from EM385-1-1, which are based on project scope, shall be complied with.

QA/QC Manager. The QC staff shall be of sufficient size to ensure adequate QC coverage of all work phases, work shifts, and work crews involved with the construction.

In addition to the following, see Attachment A – Performance Objectives and Section

5.0 Quality Control below for further QC staffing requirements and limitations.

Requirements in Attachment A – Performance Objectives take precedence over the PWS. The appointed Quality Control Manager shall possess the ASHE Healthcare Construction Certificate prior to commencing any task order work. Information regarding the ASHE Healthcare Construction Certificate may be obtained at:

http://www.hospitalconnect.com/. This individual shall also have a minimum of 5-years’ experience in the construction industry with a minimum of 3 years of this experience in healthcare design or construction industry.

NOTE: Team requirements for the team required for the seed task order may be evaluated further in Phase 2 to include the team members from Phase 1 that are specifically required for the task order. The experience/qualifications of your key personnel set out in the resumes provide in response to Phase 1 if accepted by the Government will become a specific requirement of the contract. The personnel experience contained in the Phase 1 submittal will set the contract baseline for experience of the above listed key personnel for all future task orders for the life of the MATOC. If, after award, the contractor should chose to substitute an individual team member, the contractor will be required to provide a substitute which meets or exceeds the minimum qualifications as defined by their Phase 1 proposal. This requirement extends to all future task orders (including Phase 2 of this RFP) for the life of contract.

Resumes must include the following information:

Name and title of key personnel

Number of years with this firm/with other firms (including specific title and role) Specialized experience, especially those that relates to the Salient Characteristics in Factor 2, like infection control and life safety, are of particular significance.

Active registration: number/state/year registered, if applicable

List three (3) completed projects and include project title, POC, dates, location and specific role and responsibilities for the infrastructure renovations/repairs in active healthcare facilities.

The proposal will be evaluated to deterrmine the extent to which Key Personnel meet the minimum requirements outlined in the position descriptions above.

Factor 4: Past Performance

Offeror’s Submission Requirements: Total max of 8 pages, for all information provided in this factor. This maximum includes photos, drawings, schematics, and narrative.

11x17, fold-in drawings are allowed but single-side only and counts as two pages.

Submit project information for four (4) completed projects of at least $300, 000 to $5M each, with at least one completed project over $2M, and all must have been completed within the last five years. Typically, MEDCOM Mechanical MSRM project address work in the 1) Mechanical Infrastructure, 2) Electrical Infrastructure, 3) Plumbing Infrastructure,

4) Ancillary Support Systems. At least one of the four submitted projects must have a scope of work that includes work in all four categories, and the others can be projects that include work in fewer categories. Information can include narratives, drawings, photos etc. All projects referenced shall provide location and description, owner contact information, project cost, scope, award amount and final price, and major departments affected by the renovation.

Offerors may provide details on past performance problems and corrective actions taken as a part of the proposal. When an Offeror’s firm is divided into severable segments (e.g., division, group, unit) the Government will evaluate only the past performance of those segments of the firm that will actually perform the work.

Other Sources: The Government may contact sources other than those provided by the Offeror for information with respect to past performance on projects completed, or at least 50% complete. These other sources may include, but are not limited to, CPARS, telephone interviews with organizations familiar with the Offeror’s performance, and Government personnel with personal knowledge of the Offeror’s performance capability. The Government may be unable to obtain any qualitative information under subcontracts due to the Government’s lack of privity with subcontractors. Unless otherwise requested by the subcontractor, adverse subcontractor performance information will be provided to the Offeror if discussions are held and/or during a requested debriefing.

The Government will evaluate how well the contractor performed on these contracts (See Performance Confidence Assessment below).

Rating Performance Confidence Assessments

Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence

See Performance Relevancy Rating definitions below.

Past Performance Relevancy Rating Definitions In performing the past performance factor evaluation, evaluators will apply the following relevance levels to assess the relevance of the prior contract effort(s) of offerors.

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitudwe of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Section 00 22 20 - Phase 2 Design-Build Selection Procedures and Basis of Award

PHASE 2

PHASE 2

Proposal Submission Requirements, Evaluation Criteria and Basis of Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple-Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC) for Mechanical Repairs for Army Medical Command (MEDCOM)

Phase 2 Proposals shall consist of two (2) volumes.

VOLUME 1 – Price/Cost Proposal and VOLUME 2 – Technical Proposal and shall be prepared as follows. A cover sheet identifying the Offeror (name, address, point of contact), project description, and solicitation number shall be provided. The second sheet shall be a table of contents. The proposals shall contain a detailed table of contents. If more than one binder is used, the complete table of contents shall be included in each. Offers that violate these rules unnecessarily delay the evaluation process and may be rejected by the Government after the initial evaluation without receiving any further consideration. Neither the cover sheet nor the table of contents count toward the page limitations.

DEVIATIONS. Any proposed exceptions/deviations to statement of work, codes, criteria and standards shall be clearly identified. Enumerate as separate and distinct page(s) in the proposal and reference in the table of contents.

TABS. Written proposal materials shall be submitted in standard three ring loose-leaf binders.

Proposals shall be tabbed and labeled as specified in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents.

FONT SIZE. Shall not be less than 10 point normal spacing required.

SHEET SIZE. Shall be 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches; however, if drawings, charts, or other graphics are submitted, sheets no larger than 11 inches x 17 inches and folded to 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches shall be used. Sheets that are 11 x 17 inch will be counted as two 8-1/2 inch x 11-inch sheets. All sheets shall be dated and numbered.

A sheet refers to a physical piece of paper for printed hard copies. A double sided sheet refers to paper that is printed on front side and back side. Page refers to a unit of content that may be shown on a monitor electronically or printed for hard copy on a sheet of paper. An 8 ½ x11 sheet of paper contains one (1) page of content if printed only on one side, or two (2) pages of content if printed front and back. An 11x17 sheet of paper may be printed on one side only and counts as 2 pages of content.

The proposal shall not exceed the specified page limits. The Government may not review any information in excess of the page limits or information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the proposal. The Offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of this solicitation as part of their proposal. Offers that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection.

NUMBER OF COPIES. Offerors shall submit an original hard copy in a binder and five (5) electronic copies (CDs).

PHASE 2

VOLUME I – PRICE/COST…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .