W9127S-18-R-6000_EIR_Amend_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to change the solicitation close date, incorporate Projnet inquiries and response, and section administrative changes. The folow ing changes are hereby incoroporated into this solicitation:

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 19-Jul-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9127S18R6000

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Jun-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-Jul-2018

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

W9127S 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9127S18R6000

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SECTION 00 11 00 - SF1442 AND CLIN SCHEDULE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 01 10 - TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following have been added by full text:

Requirement additions denoted in RED font.

The following Sections have been modified:

Section 00 01 10 – Table of Contents

Section 00 22 10 – Phase 1 of a 2 Phase Design Build Selection Process

The following Attachments have been modified:

Attachment 1 – Proposal Data Sheet W9127S-18-R-6000.pdf

The following Attachments have been added:

Attachment 4 – Closed Bidder Inquiry Responses (18Jul28).pdf

The following have been modified:

SECTION

Section 00 11 00 - CLIN Schedule

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

Section 00 22 10 - Phase 1 of a 2 Phase Design Build Selection Process

Section 00 22 20 - Phase 2 Proposal Submission Requirements, Evaluation Criteria and Basis of Award

Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications

Section 00 72 00 - Contract Clauses

Section 00 73 10 - Supplemental Contract Requirements

Section 00 73 46 - Wage Determination Schedule

Section 01 10 00 - Statement of Work

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Requirement additions denoted in RED font.

The following Sections have been modified:

Section 00 22 10 – Phase 1 of a 2 Phase Design Build Selection Process in its entirety

The following Attachments have been modified:

Attachment 1 – Proposal Data Sheet W9127S-18-R-6000.pdf

The following Attachments have been added:

Attachment 4 – Closed Bidder Inquiry Responses (18Jul28).pdf

(End of Summary of Changes)

SECTION 00 01 10 - TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following in RED font have been modified:

Section 00 11 00 - CLIN Schedule

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

Section 00 22 10 - Phase 1 of a 2 Phase Design Build Selection Process

Section 00 22 20 - Phase 2 Proposal Submission Requirements, Evaluation Criteria and Basis of Award

Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications

Section 00 72 00 - Contract Clauses

Section 00 73 10 - Supplemental Contract Requirements

Section 00 73 46 - Wage Determination Schedule

Section 01 10 00 - Statement of Work

Attachments:

1 – Proposal Data Sheet

2 – AFMSA Quality Standards and Design Principles (Rev 9.0 - 01Nov17)

3 – Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0)

4 – Bidder Inquiries and Responses

SECTION 00 11 00 - SF1442 AND CLIN SCHEDULE

The required response date/time has changed from 23-Jul-2018 02:00 PM to 31-Jul-2018 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS & NOTICES TO OFFERORS

The following have been modified:

CONTRACT OMBUDSMAN: In accordance with FAR 16.505(b)(6) and AFARS 5116.505(b)(6) the following is identified as Task Order Ombudsman:

Colleen J. O'Keefe

Department of the Army

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

441 G Street NW

Washington, D.C. 20314-1000

Phone: 202-761-4707

Email: Colleen.J.O'Keefe@usace.army.mil

SECTION 00 22 10 – PHASE 1 OF A 2 PHASE DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCESS

The following has been revised in its entirety:

PAGE LIMITS. Each page side shall be identified with the appropriate page number. The proposal shall not exceed the specified page limits. The Government may not review any information in excess of the page limits or information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the proposal. The offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of this solicitation as part of their proposal. Offers that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection.

NUMBER OF COPIES. Offerors shall submit six (6) copies of their proposal in CD format.

PHASE 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The Air Force Medical Support Agency (AFMSA) is responsible for managing the programming, planning, design, construction, outfitting and sustainment for the Air Force Surgeon General’s health facility program.

AFMSA/Health Facilities Division relies on the support of the US Army Corps of Engineers – Little Rock District

(CESWL) to execute its health facility program. A means to manage this program is via Indefinite

Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC). The Health Facilities

Division of AFMSA provides sustainment, repair and modernization support to facility physical plant and infrastructure systems that are installed in Air Force medical treatment facilities worldwide. The physical plant is best defined as any and all major building system(s) that provide a safe, comfortable interior environment conducive to healing. Typically, there are three predominant infrastructure systems which comprise the facility physical plant;

the Building Envelope, the Mechanical Infrastructure and the Electrical Infrastructure. In order to ensure the United

States’ military men and women, and their families, receive healthcare in properly-maintained buildings that meet all healthcare requirements, and Federal, State and Local laws the AFMSA requires experienced contractors that are dedicated and able to fulfill fast-tracked timelines. Timely, swift completion of upgrades and renovations is paramount to maintain quality, safe, infection-free facilities. Work may also include restoration, initial outfitting and/or modernization of HVAC, medical gas, plumbing, electrical, elevators, building envelope, fire protection, interior renovation, terrorism/force protection, and exterior site and systems work such as utilities infrastructure, roadways, sidewalks, parking lots, landscaping, irrigation, etc.

This acquisition will be a firm-fixed price (FFP), indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ), multiple award task order contract (MATOC) utilizing a competitive (8a) set-aside. The estimated dollar amount of the MATOC is

$240,000,000 for a base ordering period of 5 years and no option years.

This is a Two-Phase acquisition. A target pool of five (5) contractors will be selected to provide project support for

EIR healthcare projects.

It is anticipated that on average thirteen (13) task orders will be awarded during the fiscal year. The minimum task order amount is proposed at $100,000. The maximum task order is projected at $12,000,000.00. The guaranteed minimum is $10,000.00 per contractor if no task order is awarded within one year.

Preliminary Review:

The proposal shall describe the capability of the offeror to perform the program requirements. The proposal should be specific and complete in every detail; and should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the requirements. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the contracting officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an offeror's evaluation.

Technical proposals shall not include any cost information and shall not exceed the page limits described and provide all information in tabbed sections. Neither appendices nor attachments are permitted and will not be evaluated.

The program requirements reflect the disciplines that are historically common in projects throughout the EIR program but vary from project to project.

No technical designs, prices/costs or detailed technical illustrations are required or requested and will not be evaluated.

Phase 1 - Technical Proposal

Volume 1 - FACTOR 1: Management Approach

Volume 1 - FACTOR 2: Technical Qualifications

Volume 1 - FACTOR 3: Past Performance

Factor 1: Management Approach

Offeror’s Submission Requirements: Total max of 12 (twelve) pages for all information provided in this factor. This maximum includes photos, drawings, schematics, and narrative.

Management Plan - The offeror will demonstrate the approach to managing the EIR design-build program

CONUS-wide to include, AK, HI and the U.S. territories. The narrative will describe how your company will manage multiple subcontractors/consultants/projects at various geographically separate/remote locations, concurrently issued under the contract. The narrative shall include a description of the team’s structure to include organizational flow chart, responsibilities and lines of authority established for the contract and how the design and construction process and quality control shall be managed including the coordination of trade subcontractors and construction personnel. Considerations may include, construction schedule, cost control, administrative processes and risk management.

Evaluation Criteria – This factor will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it:

a) Demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of team structure and approach required for management and execution of infrastructure renovations/repairs in active healthcare facilities during continuous hospital/clinical operations.

b) Demonstrates the ability to effectively manage multiple projects with multiple subcontractors/ consultants at various geographically separate/remote locations, simultaneously.

c) Describes risks within the offeror’s control and the plan for mitigating each risk which may include cost control and administrative processes.

d) Demonstrates scheduling capabilities which allows start of construction at 65% design.

e) Demonstrates understanding of required lines of authority and responsibilities for quality control personnel.

Factor 2: Technical Qualifications

Offeror’s Submission Requirements: Total max of thirty (30) - pages for all information provided in this factor.

This maximum includes photos, drawings, schematics, and narrative. Offerors representing the combining of two or more companies for the purpose of this RFP must describe the nature of the association; indicate whether the firms have experience working together in design-build-outfitting ventures, including how long and how many projects. If the Joint Venture (JV), or teaming arrangement, has little or no recent and/or relevant projects performed, then each member of the teaming arrangement and/or JV may provide a combined total of four (4) projects. Experience by other corporate entities or JVs not named on the Proposal Data Sheet (Attachment 1) is prohibited and will not be evaluated. Joint Ventures (JVs) should also be included on the SF 1442.

Subfactor 1, Offeror’s Experience - SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Typically, there are three predominant infrastructure systems which comprise the facility physical plant; 1) the Building Envelope, 2) the Mechanical

Infrastructure and 3) the Electrical Infrastructure. Provide a narrative of four (4) projects completed within the last four (4) years with a value of at least $4 million. Information can include narratives, drawings, photos etc. Each project narrative should include at minimum:

1. Location

2. Description

3. Owner contact information

4. Project cost and scope

5. Contract award amount and final price

6. Major departments affected by renovation

7. A listing of the team members who worked on the project to include a description of their overall role and responsibility for each project.

Additionally, the following experience must be demonstrated:

1. Each of the predominant infrastructure systems must be represented in at least 1 of the 4 submitted projects.

2. Experience in active healthcare facilities during continuous hospital/clinical operations of similar size and complexity to those which will be performed under this contract.

Evaluation Criteria:

The proposal will be evaluated for the overall team’s specialized experience. The offeror shall demonstrate:

a) Team’s experience in performing the three (3) predominant infrastructure systems: 1) the Building

Envelope, 2) the Mechanical Infrastructure and 3) the Electrical Infrastructure as defined in Phase 1 –

General Requirements above

b) Team’s experience in active healthcare facilities during continuous hospital/clinical operations of similar size and complexity to those which will be performed under this contract.

Subfactor 2, Key Personnel - SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Provide a narrative listing of key personnel and key subcontractors/team arrangements required for a typical project and why they are qualified to manage the program. The proposal shall include the information below. Provide a resume (no more than a one (1) page each, no Architect-Engineering Qualifications SF330s required) for the following key personnel:

1. Program Manager

2. Project Managers (provide a resume for two (2) project managers)

3. Architect of Record

4. Electrical Engineer

5. Mechanical Engineer

6. Fire Protection Engineer

Resume must include the following information:

a) Name and title of key personnel/sub-contractor key personnel (include firm’s name)

b) Number of years with this firm/with other firms (including specific title and role)

c) Specialized experience

d) Active registration: number/state/year registered

e) List three (3) completed projects and include project title, POC, dates, location, specific role and responsibilities for the infrastructure renovations/repairs in active healthcare facilities.

The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which Key Personnel meet or exceed the minimum requirements outlined in the Program Requirements.

Factor 3: Past Performance

Offeror’s Submission Requirements: Total max of twenty four (24) - pages for all information provided in this factor. This maximum includes photos, drawings, schematics, and narrative.

a) For the projects submitted in Factor 2, Subfactor 1, Offeror’s experience, submit past performance information for four (4) projects of at least $4M each all completed within the last four (4) years.

Offerors may provide details on past performance problems and corrective actions taken as a part of the proposal. When an Offeror’s firm is divided into severable segments (e.g., division, group, unit) the Government will evaluate only the past performance of those segments of the firm that will actually perform the work.

b) Past Performance References: For the projects submitted in Factor 2, Subfactor 1, the government will query the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) to validate past performance ratings. For each project that does not have a final CPARS evaluation, offerors shall provide a NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) to the point of contact, clearly identifying the project to be evaluated. A NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire

(Form PPQ-0) is included at the end of the RFP. When completed, these forms shall be mailed, faxed or emailed to the Little Rock District Contract Specialist identified in the RFP. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that the reference documentation is provided as the Government may not make additional requests for past performance information from the references. Past performance questionnaires must reflect contracts that were 100% completed and at least $4M each in value.

c) Other Sources: The Government may contact sources other than those provided by the offeror for information with respect to past performance on projects completed, or at least 50% complete. These other sources may include, but are not limited to CPARS, telephone interviews with organizations familiar with the offeror’s performance, and Government personnel with personal knowledge of the offeror’s performance capability. The Government may be unable to obtain any qualitative information under subcontracts due to the Government’s lack of privity with subcontractors. Unless otherwise requested by the subcontractor, adverse subcontractor performance information will be provided to the offeror if discussions are held and/or during a requested debriefing.

The Government will evaluate how well the contractor performed on these contracts (See Performance

Confidence Assessment below).

Rating Performance Confidence Assessments

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

See Performance Relevancy Rating definitions below.

Past Performance Relevancy Rating Definitions In performing the past performance factor evaluation, evaluators will apply the following relevance levels to assess the relevance of the prior contract effort(s) of offerors.

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present /past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.