AMENDMENT_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Change ProjNet information

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 12

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Apr-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9127S-17-R-6030

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Mar-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Apr-2017

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

W9127S 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9127S-17-R-6030

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

A. Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items

1. Submission of Offers. Submit signed and dated offer at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Failure to provide all required documents or information may exclude the offeror(s) from further consideration. Both the electronic copy and paper/hard copy offer will be accepted at the address identified below. Only signed offers submitted on the SF 1449 will be accepted. Emailed and faxed proposals will not be considered.

Submit proposals to:

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK

(W9127S) ATTN: TIMOTHY

PIGHEE

700 W. CAPITOL AVENUE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

The Packaging:

The Proposals shall be marked:

“Proposals for Solicitation Number: W9127S-17-R-6030, Walter Reed Medical Center Swing Space IO, “DO NOT OPEN”

a. Electronic submissions via email or fax will not be accepted. Offers should be mailed through a commercial/Government carrier or hand carried.

b. This is an electronic solicitation release. No hard copies will be mailed.

Amendments to the solicitation will be posted through the Federal Business Opportunities www.fbo.gov website. It is the responsibility of each Offeror to review the webpage for notice of amendments, updates, or changes to current information.

c. All interested offerors must contact Mr. Timothy Pighee for access to all solicitation attachments at Timothy.A.Pighee@usace.army.mil. All offerors shall include the following information with request:

Company Name Employee Name Email Address Telephone Number

d. Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via e-mail to the Contract Specialist who is the primary point of contact Mr. Timothy Pighee at Timothy.A.Pighee@usace.army.mil.

e. Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures are to be submitted via ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet . To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page identified above please use the following directions:

Click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE; enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login.

Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue.

From this page you may view all proposal inquiries or add inquiry.

Offerors will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Solicitation Number is: W9127S-17-R-6030 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: Q246PX-FZ94N6 The Review will be open from April 6, 2017 through April 14, 2017

Offerors are requested to review the solicitation in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals

Oral explanations or instructions are not binding. Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

As this is a competitive negotiation acquisition, there is no public bid opening and no information will be given out as to the number of Offerors or the results of the competition until an award is made.

2. General Instructions. These instructions are designed to provide general guidance for preparing proposals as well as providing specific instructions on proposal organization, format, and content. Offerors shall include all documents and information requested and should be submitted in accordance with the instructions. The Offeror is cautioned to follow the instructions carefully, as the Government reserves the right to make an award based on initial proposals received without discussion. However, the Government reserves the right to request clarifications if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

a. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the PCO in writing with supporting rationale prior to the close of the Solicitation.

b. The proposal must be presented in a manner that clearly addresses the requirements, as set forth in the Statement of Work. Proposals that are overly verbose or include marketing material may distract from the evaluators’ ability to ascertain compliance with the solicitation.

3. Team/Team Member(s)/Teaming Partner(s). The Government will consider the offeror and all subcontractors a “team” when evidence of a signed Teaming Arrangement or Letter of Intent is provided. This RFP will refer to the offeror and all identified teaming subcontractors as a “team.” This RFP will refer to all identified teaming subcontractors as “team members” or “teaming partners.” The offeror shall identify any Team/Team Members in their Executive Summary and briefly describe how the Teaming Arrangement will be support this requirement.

4. Proposal Preparation Instructions. Offeror’s proposal will consist of two (2) separate volumes: Price and Technical.

Proposal Format. All pages of each offer must be appropriately numbered and identified with the solicitation number W9127S-17-6030 in the header and/or footer of each page. If the RFP page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit will be removed and not evaluated.

Hard Copy format and electronic copies on CDs are required in this submission, please see table below for specific numbers. Volume I and Volume II shall be submitted on two (2) separate CD-ROMs. Page limitations are also annotated.

Volume Contents Format Number Of

Copies Maximum Page

Limit

Volume I

Price Proposal

Executive Summary Signed SF 1449 Price Schedule Cut sheets and specifications for all commodities

Attachment 1, Bid Schedule Worksheet

Preaward Information

Representations and Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors

Adobe PDF for all documents.

MS Excel

2007 or Later for

Attachment 1, Bid

Schedule Worksheet

2 CD ROM

1 Hard Copy

None

Volume II

Technical Proposal

Past

Performance

Technical Approach Past Performance

Information

Adobe PDF

6 CD ROMs

26 page count for the technical approach only and shall be: 8.5 x 11 inch paper, 12 pt.

font or larger, with the exception of the IO Master Schedule. The IO Master Schedule may be 11 x 17 inch paper and font size as required;

There is no page limitation for Tab B, Past Performance.

Volume Labels. All original volumes and copies will have cover sheets that identify volume number, title, copy number or “Original,” solicitation number, and Offeror’s name

What Counts As A Page? A page shall be an 8 ½ X 11” sheet of paper, with the exception of the sample integrated master schedule which can 11” X 17” paper size.

When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages (For paper/hard copies). Letter size and spacing requirements for illustrations and tables can be at the discretion of the offeror but must be easily readable. Margins shall be at least 1 inch on the top and bottom and 3/4 inch on the side. The Contractor shall number each page in order to eliminate any confusion. In the event contractor creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

Page Limit Includes: All Appendices, Charts, Graphs, Diagrams, Tables, Photographs, Drawings, etc.

Page Limit Does Not Include (For Paper/Hard Copies): Title Page, Table of Contents, Lists of tables and drawings and/or Cross Reference Matrix’s, covers for Volumes, Glossary of Terms/Abbreviations and Acronyms, Indices, and section dividers. Cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections.

Copies. Volume I and Volume II shall each have their own CD-ROM.

Proposal Labels. The exterior of the envelope or box containing proposal Volumes, either mailed or hand delivered, shall be labeled with Offeror’s name, title, solicitation number, and marked “ Package X of X” (with “X” indicating the number of packages) and “To be Delivered Unopened to the Contracting Officer.”

Electronic Copies.

a. All electronic copies of volumes shall be submitted on its own CD-ROM disk with a separate file for each Tab in Volumes I and II.

b. Volume I will be submitted using Adobe PDF and Microsoft Office Excel 2007 for Attachment 1, Bid Schedule Worksheet. Volume II shall be submitted using Adobe PDF.

c. Sound or video (e.g. MPEG) files should not be embedded into the proposal files.

d. The CD-ROM and protective sleeve will be clearly marked as to volume number, Offeror's name, solicitation title, solicitation number, and marked as “Initial” or “Revision X,” with “X” indicating the number of the revision.

Elaborate CD-ROM disk labels are not required or desired.

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each volume will contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each.

No pricing information is to be presented in any part of the proposal outside of the Volume I.

Change Pages After Initial Proposal Submission. If the Government opens discussions and requests the offeror submit proposal revisions, during or after discussions, any changed pages that are submitted will be a different color from the original proposal pages, and will have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page identifying the changed content. The date of the revision and revision number will be reflected on each changed page (preferably on, or next to, the vertical change line).

Make spreadsheet revisions obvious by highlighting cells that changed. Page limitations may also be placed on responses to Evaluation Notice (ENs). The Government will identify specified page limits for ENs responses in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offeror.

a. Volume I – Price Proposal

TAB A – Executive Summary. Provide an executive summary that describes the significant attributes and theme of its proposal and introduces the contractor’s team.

This should also include a contact list (with phone numbers, fax numbers, mailing addresses, e-mail addresses, etc.) to include personnel authorized to sign for and to negotiate on behalf of their company.

TAB B – Completed and Signed SF 1449 and acknowledgement of all amendments.

The SF 1449 shall be submitted fully completed. The offeror is cautioned that the SF 1449 must contain a signature in block 30a. of the form. The contractor will acknowledge all amendments to the RFP in accordance with the instructions on the SF 1449 and with Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instruction to Offerors Commercial Items.

TAB C –Contract Pricing Schedule, to include all supporting data. The pricing schedule shall be submitted fully completed and error free. It shall contain the Offeror’s prices for the established Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs). Please submit the following information to support your IO pricing and understanding:

CLIN 0001 – IO-T: Includes planning services, commodity validation, project management, transition, move planning, inventory, and space development of commodities, lists and requirements in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW).

CLIN 0002 – IO-C: This includes the procurement, delivery, installation, transition, disposition, and warranting of commodities planned during IO-T in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW).

TAB D – This tab shall include the cut sheets or specifications of all commodities that are being priced in the offerors. Cut sheets shall include all product specifications.

TAB E – Pre Award Information (e.g. Bank and Supplier References). In accordance with FAR 9.103(a), “Purchases shall be made from, and contracts awarded to, responsible prospective contractors only.” So that the Government can make a determination of Contractor responsibility, a prospective contractor must meet the standards as set forth in FAR 9.104 that requires a contractor to have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them.

As an aid in assessing responsibility, the offeror shall notify their banks/suppliers that the Corps of Engineers may be contracting them, and shall authorize the banks/suppliers to release the following information regarding the Offeror’s account. If a written authorization is required by the Offeror’s bank. Offeror’s shall provide that written authorization with their proposal. The following information shall be provided:

Name and Telephone Number of Bank’s Point of Contact Number of Years business has been conducted with each bank Types of open accounts (checking, savings, loans, etc.)

Balance of current accounts (the banks will provide a “range of figures” for this information such as medium five-figures range) Means by which loans are secured and if paid as agreed Point of Contact and Telephone Number for three (3) different Suppliers

Pre-award survey data will be used as it relates to the probability of the offeror successfully accomplishing the proposed effort. The Government will use pre-ward survey data provided by the Offeror and data obtained by other sources to perform this assessment.

TAB F - Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors. The offeror will ensure that Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements are submitted thoroughly completed with all blocks in each certification/representation completed truthfully and completely.

b. Volume II – Technical Proposal. The Technical proposal shall not exceed the specified page limits listed in the table above (26 page count). The Government will not review any information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the proposal in excess of the establish limits. The offeror shall comply with the page limitations. The Offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of the solicitation or SOW as part of their technical proposal. Offerors that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection. The Technical proposal shall not include any cost or price information.

(1) TAB A Table of Contents

(2) TAB B Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

(3) TAB C Technical Approach

TAB C1 – Company/Team Qualifications and Experience TAB C2 – Transition Planning and Execution TAB C3 – Master Schedule and Approach

(4) TAB D Past Performance

The Technical Proposal should include, at a minimum, the following information.

TAB C1 – Company/Team Qualifications and Experience. The Company/Team Qualifications and Experience must reflect a clear understanding of the program’s objectives, operating environment, and the demands and constraints in regards to the customer supported.

The Offerors approach shall include:

A narrative that reflects the Offeror’s overall understanding of the Initial Outfitting program requirement as required by the Statement of Work to include corporate experience that is relevant and recent, as it relates to the Statement of Work in executing Initial Outfitting Work.

Offerors shall include not more than four 1 page project information sheets (included in the 26 page count) each for the prime and each major sub-contractor. Each page shall contain only one project. Offerors shall not include a listing of projects. Projects must be recent (completed or at least 50% complete within 3 years from the issue date of this RFP) and relevant (IO for medical facilities) to be considered for evaluation. The following information shall be included on each project information sheet:

The team member submitting the project

Role/Description of responsibilities for the project

Project description to include at minimum customer, location, general scope, size, dollar value, percent complete or date completed and any problems encounter and how, those problems were overcome

Customer POC with telephone number

Offerors shall include a description of the relationship to each of its teaming members to include any major sub-contractors as well as the roles and responsibilities of each teaming member and major sub-contractor for which corporate experience is submitted for consideration.

Offerors shall provide a staffing matrix which identifies all personnel on their team and the qualifications that they possess in order to satisfy the minimum requirements of Section VI in the Statement of Work.

TAB C2 – Transition Planning and Execution. Offerors shall submit a sample Transition Plan (1-Page), using the Statement of Work, demonstrating a methodology for transition planning and an understanding of key milestones and coordination details involved in moving staff and departments. Provide a level of detail that indicates an understanding of the requirements for meeting and fulfilling the SOW. The evaluation will focus on the Offeror’s:

Ability to develop a complete, accurate and concise transition plan;

Provide narrative explaining methods, processes and approaches to plan development;

Provide narrative explaining methods, processes and approaches to coordinating key milestones with dynamic Construction schedule; and

Understanding of risks associated and mitigation strategies required for IO transition planning.

TAB C3 – Master Schedule and Approach. Offeror’s shall submit a sample IO Master Schedule (1 page), using the Statement of Work, focusing on the Offeror’s ability to schedule and coordinate critical aspects of the IO process. The evaluation will focus on the Offeror’s:

Ability to develop a complete, accurate and concise IO Master Schedule;

Provide a Departmental/room level relocation schedule, showing original and proposed location;

Provide narrative explaining methods, processes and approaches to schedule development;

Provide a narrative explaining the Offeror’s understanding of the risks associated and mitigation strategies required when it comes to the approach to the master schedule.

TAB D – Past Performance. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 3 of all relevant (same or similar items) health- care/IO contracts of the Prime Contractor that are complete or at least 50% complete within the last 3 years. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 1), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Mr. Timothy Pighee via email at timothy.a.pighee@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Offerors may provide details on past performance problems and corrective actions taken as a part of the proposal. When an Offeror’s firm is divided into severable segments (e.g., division, group, unit) the Government will evaluate only the past performance of those segments of the firm that will actually perform the work. Additionally, if Offeror has no relevant past performance, information may be provided for key subcontractors.

The offeror shall submit, along with the information required in this paragraph, a consent letter, executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter, authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the Offeror's performance.

Recency Assessment. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of this RFP. Information that fails the recency assessment will not be evaluated.

Relevancy Assessment. To be relevant, the effort must be similar to the nature of work, size, magnitude, complexity and scope to the work required by this RFP. The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information provided to determine if it is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services/products being procured under this RFP. In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. Relevant experience information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance data from other sources than those identified by the offeror in evaluating past performance. This includes, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency. Offerors are reminded that both independent data and data provided by Offerors in their proposals may be used by the Government to evaluate offeror past performance. However, the burden of providing thorough, complete, and current past performance information as requested in this paragraph remains with the Offerors. Proposals that do not contain the information requested by this paragraph risk rejection or a less than acceptable performance rating by the Government. All past performance comments received will be taken into account and could affect the overall rating. The overall past performance evaluation is a subjective decision based on the whole of all data received. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)).

Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

(End of Summary of Changes)