VOL2.PDF

VOLUME 2 OF 3

THIS IS A TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SETASIDE

SOLICITATION NO: W9127821R0026

CADD NO: MEF20007

SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

MAIN GATE RELOCATION

PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA

(BREVARD COUNTY)

“GOOD ENGINEERING RESULTS IN A BETTER ENVIRONMENT”

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, MOBILE

109 St. Joseph St

Mobile, Alabama 36602

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

RELOCATE MAIN GATE W9127821R0026

PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA MEF20007

Table of Contents Page 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

VOLUME 1 OF 3

CHECKLIST FOR PREPARATION OF OFFERS

BIDDING REQUIREMENTS

STANDARD FORM 1442 - SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD

BIDDING SCHEDULE

EXPLANATION OF BID ITEMS

STANDARD FORM 24 - BID BOND

STANDARD FORM 28 - AFFIDAVIT OF INDIVIDUAL SURETY

STANDARD FORM LLL - DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES

00 11 00 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

00 12 00 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

00 21 16 INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

00 70 00 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

SPECIFICATIONS

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 00 00 ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

PROJECT SIGNS

DD FORM 1354

DD FORM 1354 CHECKLIST

WAGE RATES

CESAM FORM 1151, PROMPT PAYMENT CERTIFICATION AND

SUPPORTING DATA FOR CONTRACTOR PROGRESS PAYMENT INVOICE

01 10 10 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

01 10 12 DESIGN AFTER AWARD

01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE

01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

SUBMITTAL REGISTER

FORM 4025

01 33 29 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL

01 45 00.15 10 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE (RMS CM)

SAM FORM 696

01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITES AND CONTROLS

01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS

01 74 19 CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL

01 78 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA

01 78 24.00 10 FACILITY DATA REQUIREMENTS

01 91 00.15 TOTAL BUILDING COMMISSIONING

DIVISION 02 – EXISTING CONDITIONS

02 41 00 DEMOLITION

02 82 00 ASBESTOS REMEDIATION PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE

RELOCATE MAIN GATE W9127821R0026

Table of Contents Page 2

02 83 00 LEAD REMEDIATION PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE

02 84 16 HANDLING OF LIGHTING BALLASTS AND LAMPS CONTAINING PCBS AND

MERCURY PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE

DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK

31 31 16.13 CHEMICAL TERMITE CONTROL

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A NOT USED

APPENDIX B PATRICK AFB MAIN GATE SID

APPENDIX C FIRE HYDRANT DATA

APPENDIX D PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION AND GEOTECH

ENGINEERING EVALUATION

VOLUME 2 OF 3

APPENDIX E HAZMAT REPORT

APPENDIX F NOT USED

APPENDIX G UFGS 34 71 13.19 CRASH RATED ACTIVE VEHICLE BARRIERS &

CONTROLS

APPENDIX H 45 SWI 32-7001 042318

APPENDIX I AF SUSTAINABILITY REQUIREMENTS SCORESHEET

APPENDIX J SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL TRACKING FORM

APPENDIX K 45 SWI 32-7001 (2008) EXTERIOR LIGHTING MANAGEMENT

APPENDIX L FLORIDA STATUTE CHAPTER 62B-55 MODEL LIGHTING ORDINANCE FOR

MARINE TURTLE PROTECTION

APPENDIX M 45 SW PLAN 32-1052 (2009) ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX N OPLAN 19-14 (2015) PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND HAZARDOUS

VOLUME 3 OF 3

APPENDIX O 45 SW LEAD PLAN (2009) LEAD MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX P OPLAN 19-16 (2009) PCB ITEMS CONTROL PLAN

APPENDIX Q AF131-101 GM (AFGM 2015-01)

APPENDIX R NON NUCLEAR IDS APPROVAL LETTER 30 JAN 19

APPENDIX S NOT USED

APPENDIX T GEOTECH REPORT 18-6376 REPORT 07-09-18

APPENDIX U PATRICK AFB HAZMAT REPORT/ACM REPORT

--End of Project Table of Contents--

RELOCATE MAIN GATE W9127819SFHZ0004

APPENDIX E

HAZMAT REPORT

January 11, 2019

Mrs. Shannon Bailey-Partlow Tetra Tech, Inc.

200 West Side Square, Suite 912 Huntsville, Alabama 35801

Subject: Pre-Demolition Hazardous Materials Survey Report Building 264 Patrick Air Force Base, Brevard County, Florida

103IG6122

Dear Mrs. Bailey-Partlow:

Tetra Tech, Inc. is pleased to submit the enclosed pre-demolition hazardous materials survey report of Building 264 located at Patrick Air Force Base (PAFB), Brevard County, Florida.

The survey was conducted on December 18 through 20, 2018.

The project area was evaluated for the presence, locations, and quantity of suspected asbestos-containing materials (ACM) that may require pre-demolition abatement in accordance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) as adopted by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The intent of the asbestos NESHAP regulation is to protect the public (and workers) by minimizing the release of asbestos fibers during activities that involve processing, handling, and disposing of ACMs.

Tetra Tech’s survey also included a similar evaluation of the structure for the presence, locations, and quantity of damaged or intact lead-based paint (LBP) or glazed tiles that contain lead at levels that exceed hazard thresholds and that would require Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) worker safety precautions during demolition. Bulk samples of representative materials were collected during the survey.

A hazardous materials inventory was also conducted during the asbestos and LBP survey. The inventory was limited to materials easily observed during the walk-through inspection of the structure. These areas were evaluated for hazardous materials such as thermostats and fluorescent light bulbs possibly containing mercury, fluorescent light ballasts potentially containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), emergency lighting and exit signs that house batteries containing heavy metals, containers holding hazardous materials (such as cleaning supplies and paint), refrigeration appliances, and any other household hazardous waste items that may need to be removed before demolition.

TETRA TECH INC.

2000 Warrington Way, Suite 245, Louisville, Kentucky 40222 www.Tetratech.com

Mrs. Shannon Bailey-Partlow January 11, 2019

2000 Warrington Way, Suite 245, Louisville, Kentucky, 40222 www.Tetratech.com

This letter summarizes the survey findings. Detailed findings are provided in the enclosed survey report.

Asbestos-Containing Materials

Forty-two samples of suspected ACM were collected from the site structure, totaling 50 individual analyzed sample layers. One sample representing one homogenous material tested positive for asbestos. Asbestos was not detected in the other samples collected. ACM identified during the survey was black tar associated with white sealant on the roof.

Fire doors suspected to contain asbestos (assumed asbestos) were observed throughout the building. Approximately 8 fire doors were observed.

Lead-Based Paint

Tetra Tech collected three tile samples from representative building components and six bulk paint chip samples from representative damaged paint on building components throughout the structure that were suspected to contain lead. Two paint chip samples contained detectable lead concentrations above the laboratory reporting limit. One sample with concentrations of 0.19 percent by weight (1,900 parts per million [ppm]), and one sample containing 0.0049 percent by weight (49 ppm). Lead was not detected in the other paint or in tile samples collected.

Other Hazardous Materials

Tetra Tech searched for other hazardous building components such as fluorescent light fixtures with mercury-containing light tubes and light ballasts possibly containing PCBs, mercury-containing thermostat, hazardous and household chemicals, transformers, air conditioners and refrigeration units, and emergency exit lighting housing batteries.

An inventory summary of materials counted per building wing, is summarized in the table below.

SUMMARY OF MATERIALS INVENTORIED

MATERIAL TOTAL

Miscellaneous liquid cleaners (janitorial supplies etc.) variety of sizes Approx. 1 gallon Compact fluorescent bulb Approx. 14 Fluorescent tubes Approx. 10 each Fluorescent light ballasts Approx.10 each Smoke detectors Approx. 20 each Emergency lights/exits (batteries) 3 each Refrigeration /air conditioning (AC) units 30 AC wall units

1 outside AC unit Refrigerators (rooms) 10 each Ice Machine 1 each Lead vent flashing caps (roof) 11 each

We appreciate the opportunity to serve to you. Please call us at (502) 569-9067 if you have any questions or if we can be of further service.

January 11, 2019

2000 Warrington Way, Suite 245, Louisville, Kentucky, 40222 www.Tetratech.com

Sincerely, Tetra Tech, Inc.

Sherry Weedman, R. S.

Senior Environmental Scientist Sherry.Weedman@tetratech.com

Enclosure

PRE-DEMOLITION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

SURVEY REPORT

For:

Building 264

Patrick Air Force Base

Cocoa Beach, Florida

Prepared by:

Tetra Tech, Inc.

2000 Warrington Way, Suite 245

Louisville, Kentucky 40222

Tetra Tech Project No.

103IG6122

January 2019 i

Table of Contents

Section Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 SITE STRUCTURE

3.0 FIELD SURVEY AND ANALYTICAL PROTOCOLS

3.1 ACM Field Survey and Analytical Protocols

3.2 LBP Field Survey and Analytical Protocols

4.0 FINDINGS

4.1 ACM Findings

4.2 LBP Findings

4.3 Hazardous Building Components

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Confirmed Asbestos

5.2 Presumed ACM/ Assumed ACM

5.3 LBP

6.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW

6.1 Regulatory Overview for Asbestos

6.2 Regulatory Overview for Lead-Based Paint

7.0 ABATEMENT COST ESTIMATES

8.0 LIMITATIONS

Tables

Table 1. PLM Results for ACM Samples

Table 2. AAS Results for Lead in Paint Samples

Table 3 Hazardous Materials Inventoried

Table 4 ACM Abatement Estimates

Table 5 Lead Containing Paint Stabilization / Lead Cost Estimate ii

Figures

Figure 1. 1st Floor Sampling Locations

Figure 2. 2nd Floor Sampling Locations

Figure 3. Roof Sampling Locations

Appendices

A Survey Team Certifications

B Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Forms for Suspect Asbestos Samples

C Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Forms for Suspect Paint Samples

D Photographic Log of Selected Photographs

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Tetra Tech, Inc., conducted a pre-demolition hazardous materials survey of Building 264, located in Cocoa Beach, Florida. The survey was a prerequisite to demolition of the structure and involved collecting and analyzing suspected asbestos-containing material (ACM), collecting and analyzing damaged and intact suspect lead-based paint (LBP) and coatings, and inventorying other hazardous materials observed during the walk-through inspection of the building

Tetra Tech’s Ms. Lona Pearson and Ms. Amanda Dones conducted this survey, overseen by Ashby Hoover, a licensed State of Florida Asbestos Consultant, on December 18 through December 20, 2018. Ms. Pearson is an EPA accredited; Asbestos Hazard Environmental Response Act (AHERA) asbestos building inspector licensed by the state of Florida, and EPA certified lead-based paint inspector. Ms. Dones is an EPA accredited AHERA building inspector. The survey team’s credentials are provided in Appendix A.

The survey evaluated the interior and exterior of the structure for the presence, locations, quantity, and characterization of ACM that may require pre-demolition abatement in accordance with National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations, as adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The intent of the asbestos NESHAP regulations is to protect the public (and workers) by minimizing the release of asbestos fibers during activities that involve processing, handling, and disposing of ACM.

Tetra Tech’s survey also included a similar evaluation of the interior and exterior areas of the structure for the presence, locations, and quantity of LBP or coatings with lead at concentrations that exceed hazard levels, which would necessitate Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) worker safety precautions during demolition. Therefore, Tetra Tech also collected paint samples from damaged and intact painted surfaces and glazed materials for analysis of lead.

A hazardous materials inventory was also conducted during the asbestos and lead-based paint survey. The inventory was limited to materials easily observed during the walk-through inspection of the structure.

Tetra Tech provided these services consistent with the level and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. The scope of services performed in executing this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use of this document, the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user. Although a reasonable attempt has been made to identify suspect ACM and LBP in all parts of the building, the inspection techniques used are inherently limited in the sense that only full demolition procedures can reveal all building materials of a structure and therefore all areas of potential ACM or LBP. This survey report does not warrant against future operations or conditions that may not be consistent with its recommendations. Moreover, completion of the survey does not guarantee identification of all hazardous materials, ACM, or LBP because of some limitations on destructive sampling during the survey. Hazardous materials may be present in voids of walls or ceilings.

This survey report presents the survey findings for ACM, LBP, and hazardous materials inventory.

Section 2.0 of the report describes the site structure. Section 3.0 discusses field survey and analytical protocols. Section 4.0 presents findings. Section 5.0 provides recommendations based on the survey findings. Section 6.0 presents a regulatory overview. Section 7.0 presents abatement cost estimates. Section 8.0 presents limitations of the survey.

2.0 SITE STRUCTURE

Building 264 was evaluated during this survey effort. The structure is approximately 8,330-square-foot (ft2) and consists of a two-story building with a pair of one-story suites used as visiting officers’ quarters lodging. The structure was partially occupied at the time of the survey. The building is constructed of concrete masonry unit (CMU) and concrete with steel frame on concrete slab. The structure exterior is finished with painted stucco siding and painted CMU. Roofing on Building 264 is flat asphaltic rolled roofing on a wood deck.

Interior finishes include painted and textured drywall walls and ceilings, ceramic tile walls and floors, vinyl sheet flooring remnants, and carpet flooring.

3.0 FIELD SURVEY AND ANALYTICAL PROTOCOLS

The field survey and analytical protocols for the ACM and LBP surveys are discussed below.

3.1 ACM Field Survey and Analytical Protocols

Tetra Tech made every effort to inspect all areas of the structure. Minor demolition of materials was required during the survey effort. The inspector took care to ensure that the areas remained unoccupied during sample collection. A total of 42 bulk samples of suspected ACM were collected from the site structure, which totaled 50 analyzed sample layers. Bulk samples were collected of suspected ACM identified during the visual inspection. Suspected ACMs were grouped as homogeneous areas if the material was similar in appearance and texture. However, if the inspector decided that a material (for example, wall texturing) was not similar in appearance and texture to other materials in the building, the inspector would distinguish the material as unique and collect samples of each unique material. The classifications of suspected ACMs were assigned in accordance with the protocol recommended in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 763, “Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools; Final Rule and Notice.” Representative bulk samples were collected from each homogeneous and unique material identified.

Bulk samples of suspected ACM were obtained to ensure that each distinct layer of material would be collected. Tetra Tech attempted to obtain material from each individual layer. A wetting agent was applied to friable surfaces before the sample was collected to reduce the potential for fiber release. All samples were placed in plastic bags, labeled, and sealed immediately after they were collected. After each sample was collected, the sampling instruments were wiped clean using a wet, lint-free cloth to prevent cross-contamination between samples. A unique identification number was assigned to each sample.

Sample identification numbers identify each sample collected. The sample numbers nomenclature is described below:

For example, sample: 264-DWJC-01

264 = location Building 264

DWJC = drywall and joint compound homogenous material group

01 = sample number one in material group

The samples remained in the inspector’s custody until they were sent to the laboratory. When sampling was complete, the bulk samples were sent, along with chain-of-custody documentation to Eurofins CEI, Inc (ECEI) in Cary, North Carolina. ECEI is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and is a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)-certified laboratory, certification number 101768-0. Bulk asbestos samples were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the EPA-recommended test method described in 40 CFR 763, Subpart F, Appendix A.

Appendix B of this report provides the ACM analytical results and chain-of-custody forms for the bulk samples.

3.2 LBP Field Survey and Analytical Protocols

Tetra Tech made every effort to inspect all areas of the structures for damaged paint and tile. The inspector took care to ensure that the immediate areas in the structure remained unoccupied when samples were collected. Bulk paint chip and tile samples of suspected LBP were collected during the visual inspection. Before samples were collected, a wetting agent was applied to surfaces to reduce the potential for release of dust. All suspect lead samples were placed in clean sample containers, labeled, and sealed. The samples remained in the inspector’s custody until they were sent to the laboratory. After each sample was collected, the sampling instruments were wiped clean using a wet, lint-free cloth to prevent cross-contamination between samples.

A unique sample identification number was assigned to each sample. After the sampling was completed, the samples were sent, along with Tetra Tech’s chain-of-custody documentation, to ECEI, who forwarded the samples under chain-of-custody to Environmental Hazards Services, LLC (EHS) in Richmond, Virginia. EHS is an AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Program accredited laboratory, laboratory ID number 100420. Samples were analyzed using flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).

Appendix C of this report provides AAS analytical results and chain-of-custody forms for the paint chip and tile samples.

4.0 FINDINGS

Survey and analytical findings for the samples collected are summarized below. Sample collection locations are provided on Figures 1, 2, and 3. Appendix B present the PLM laboratory results, Appendix C the AAS laboratory results, and Appendix D provides a photograph log of selected photograph collected during the inspection.

4.1 ACM Findings

The PLM results for the ACM samples are summarized in Tables 1 below; the complete results are provided in the laboratory reports included as Appendix B. Bold results in each table indicate that asbestos was detected.

Table 1 provides PLM results for Building 264.

TABLE 1

PLM RESULTS FOR ACM SAMPLES BUILDING 264

Figure ID Sample ID Material Description Material Locations Analytical Result % 1

1 264-DWJC-01 Drywall and joint compound Room and corridor walls ND

2 264-DWJC-02 Drywall and joint compound Room and corridor walls ND

3 264-DWJC-03 Drywall and joint compound Room and corridor walls ND

264-CTX-01 Ceiling texture popcorn Rooms, ceilings and 1st floor corridor ceilings

ND

264-CTX-02 Ceiling texture on drywall Rooms, ceilings and 1st floor corridor ceilings

ND

264-CTX-03 Ceiling texture on drywall Rooms, ceilings and 1st floor corridor ceilings

ND

264-CTX-04 Ceiling texture on drywall Rooms, ceilings and 1st floor corridor ceilings

ND

264-CTX-05 Ceiling texture on drywall Rooms, ceilings and 1st floor corridor ceilings

ND

264-DWTX-01 Drywall joint compound with texture Restroom walls and ceilings

ND

264-DWTX-02 Drywall joint compound with texture Restroom walls and ceilings

ND

264-DWTX-03 Drywall joint compound with texture Restroom walls and ceilings

ND

12 264-ST-1 Stair tread Stairwells ND

264 -FR-01 Flooring remnant Housekeeping closet and janitor room

ND

264 -FR-02 Flooring remnant Housekeeping closet and janitor room

ND

264-CFT-1 12” x 12” ceramic floor tile bed and grout Ice machine rooms ND

264-CFT2-01 6” x 6” gray ceramic floor tile bed and grout Restrooms ND

264-CFT2-02 6” x 6” gray ceramic floor tile bed and grout Restrooms ND

264-CFT3-01 6” x 6” tan ceramic floor tile bed and grout Corridors ND

264-CFT3-02 6” x 6” tan ceramic floor tile bed and grout Corridors ND

20 264-CA-01 Carpet adhesive Rooms ND

21 264-CA-02 Carpet adhesive Rooms ND

22 264-CA-03 Carpet adhesive Rooms ND

23 264-CA2-1 Carpet adhesive 2 Housekeeping closet ND

264-CMU-01 CMU grout Throughout under stucco and drywall

ND

264-CMU-02 CMU grout Throughout under stucco and drywall

ND

264-CMU-03 CMU grout Throughout under stucco and drywall

ND

27 264-STU-01 Stucco Exterior siding finish ND

28 264-STU-02 Stucco Exterior siding finish ND

29 264-STU-03 Stucco Exterior siding finish ND

R1 264-RM-01 Rolled roofing Lower level ND

R2 264-RM-02 Rolled roofing Upper level ND

PLM RESULTS FOR ACM SAMPLES BUILDING 264

Figure ID Sample ID Material Description Material Locations Analytical Result % 1

R3 264-RM-03 Rolled roofing Upper level ND

R4 264-BF-01 Base flashings Lower level ND

R5 264-BF-02 Base flashings Lower level ND

R6 264-CF-01 Curb flashings Lower level ND

R7 264-CF-02 Curb flashings Upper level ND

R8 264-CF-03 Curb flashings Upper level ND

R9 264-PS-01 Penetration sealant Lower level ND

R10 264-PS-02 Penetration sealant Upper level ND

R11 264-PS-03 Penetration sealant Upper level ND

R12 264-PP-1 Pitch pot Upper level ND

R13 264-WS-1 White sealant over tar Upper level center fan ND – White sealant 10% Chrys. – Black tar

Notes:

Bold values indicate asbestos was detected 1 Result includes all layers unless otherwise specified “ Inch

Chrys. Chrysotile asbestos % Percent

ND Asbestos not detected ACM Asbestos-containing material PLM Polarized light microscopy

4.2 LBP Findings

The AAS results for painted surfaces and tile are summarized in Table 2 below; the laboratory reports are provided in Appendix C. Results in bold indicate that lead was detected.

TABLE 2

AAS RESULTS FOR LEAD IN PAINT SAMPLES

Figure

ID

Sample No.

Material Description Material Locations Lead

Concentration

Lead Concentration

(ppm)

P1 264-P-1 Paint, beige on drywall Stairwell corridor <0.0035 <35

P2 264-P-2 Paint, tan on metal Stair rail 0.0049 49

P3 264-P-3 Paint, tan on metal Metal doors <0.0048 <48

P4 264-P-4 Paint, white on wood/metal

Wood doors and metal frames

0.19 1,900

P5 264-P-5 Paint, white on CMU Janitor closet <0.0042 <42

P6 264-P-6 Paint, tan on stucco Stucco exterior walls <0.38 <38

T1 264-T-1 Tan 6” x 6” ceramic floor tile

Entry corridors <0.0061 <61

T2 264-T-2 Cream 12” x12” ceramic floor tile

Ice machine room <0.0038 <38

T3 264-T-3 Gray 6” x 6” ceramic floor tile

Room restrooms <0.0048 <48

Notes:

Bold value indicate lead was detected in sample.

“ inch

< less than laboratory detection limit for sample

% Percent by weight

AAS Flame atomic absorption spectrometry ppm parts per million

4.3 Hazardous Building Components

Tetra Tech searched for other hazardous building components such as fluorescent light fixtures with mercury-containing light tubes and light ballasts possibly containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury-containing thermostats, hazardous and household chemicals, transformers, and emergency exit lighting. The inventory was limited to materials easily observed during the walk-through inspection of the structure. Fluorescent light ballasts observed were marked non-PCB; however, not all ballasts were inspected, and PCB containing ballasts may be present.

Heating ventilation and air conditioning equipment and appliances containing Freon were observed within the interior and exterior of the structure. Each appliance and equipment planned for removal should be properly evacuated of gases before it is disturbed, removed, or disassembled from the structure.

Tables 3 below provides a summary of the hazardous materials inventoried.

TABLE 3

SUMMARY OF MATERIALS INVENTORIED

MATERIAL TOTAL

Miscellaneous liquid cleaners (janitorial supplies etc.) variety of sizes Approx. 1 gallon Compact fluorescent bulb Approx. 14 Fluorescent tubes Approx. 10 each Fluorescent light ballasts Approx.10 each Smoke detectors Approx. 20 each Emergency lights/exits (batteries) 3 each Refrigeration /air conditioning units 30 AC wall units

1 outside AC unit Refrigerators (rooms) 10 each Ice Machine 1 each Lead plate vent flashing caps (roof) 11 each

Notes 1 Lead plate penetration flashing is located on roof top vent caps. Approximately 11 vent caps were observed. The vent caps observed were in good condition. If not planned for reuse, the roof caps should be removed intact during demolition activities and disposed or recycled according to local regulations.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations are provided below for asbestos building materials and lead-containing paint coatings.

5.1 Confirmed Asbestos

Forty-two samples of suspected ACM were collected from the site structure, totaling 50 individual analyzed sample layers. One sample representing one homogenous material tested positive. This sample was confirmed to contain more than 1 percent asbestos in at least one sample. Asbestos was not detected in the other samples collected. ACM identified during the survey are summarized below.

• An estimated 12 square feet of white sealant over tar is located on the upper roof center fan. The tar associated with the white sealant contains 10 percent chrysotile and is represented by sample 264-WS-1. The tar should be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor before renovation disturbs the ACM. The removed waste must be transported to a disposal site able to accept Category I non-friable ACM.

5.2 Assumed ACM

During the survey, Tetra Tech observed approximately 8 fire doors in the structure. Typically, it is less costly to assume fire doors contain asbestos and dispose of them, than to open and sample them in an asbestos-regulated enclosure. Tetra Tech recommends that the suspect fire doors on site be handled and disposed of as potentially friable ACM if demolition plans will disturb the materials.

5.3 LBP

Three suspect lead-containing tile samples and six suspect lead-containing paint chip samples were collected throughout the structure. Two paint chip sample collected contained detectable lead concentrations. LCP identified during the survey are summarized below.

• Tan paint (0.0049 percent lead by weight) on interior metal stair rail was noted in intact condition. Damaged LCP should be stabilized prior to disturbance by renovation activities or demolition. Stabilization waste (chips, dust, rags, etc.) should be characterized to determine appropriate waste stream disposal. All work must follow OSHA guidelines for LCP disturbance.

• White paint (0.19 percent lead by weight) on interior metal and wood door frames was noted in intact condition. Damaged LCP should be stabilized prior to disturbance by renovation activities or demolition. Stabilization waste (chips, dust, rags, etc.) should be characterized to determine appropriate waste stream disposal. All work must follow OSHA guidelines for LCP disturbance.

6.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW

Regulatory oversight of management, removal, and disposal of ACM and LBP is provided by a variety of federal, state, and local agencies. Section 6.1 overviews regulations regarding ACM, and Section 6.2 overviews regulations regarding LBP.

6.1 Regulatory Overview for Asbestos

Regulatory oversight of management, removal, and disposal of ACM is provided by a variety of federal, state, and local agencies.

Regulatory agencies enforce the following three primary regulations pertaining to various activities (inspection, assessment, and abatement) relating to ACM: AHERA, NESHAP, and the Asbestos Construction Safety Standard (as codified in federal OSHA). EPA regulations regarding identification, handling, management, and abatement of ACM (as specified in AHERA and NESHAP) are implemented by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP).

Federal OSHA and FDEP regulate asbestos as a worker health and safety issue. Transportation and disposal of asbestos-containing wastes are overseen by the EPA and FDEP. The federal OSHA, EPA, and FDEP define ACM as materials containing greater than 1 percent asbestos.

The following are brief descriptions of the three major regulations relating to ACM:

Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)

AHERA, as implemented by EPA (40 CFR Part 763), primarily pertains to assessment and management of ACM in kindergarten through 12, public, private, and nonprofit schools. However, many of the procedures, training requirements, and certifications specified by AHERA have become the industry standard for all other facilities. During this survey, AHERA protocols were generally used in efforts to identify, assess, and sample building materials suspected to contain asbestos.

National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)

NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61) is an asbestos standard that protects the public from exposure to asbestos that would result from renovation or demolition. NESHAP requires surveying for suspect materials (as defined above), notifying of intent to renovate or demolish, removing regulated ACM (RACM) before renovation or demolition, and properly managing asbestos containing wastes. A RACM is defined by NESHAP as follows:

• Any friable ACM

• A Category I non-friable ACM (such as floor tiles and asphalt roofing products) that has become friable or will be subject to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading during renovation or demolition

• A Category II non-friable ACM (all other non-friable ACMs) that has a high probability of becoming friable during demolition or renovation.

Note that while NESHAP regulates renovation and demolition, it does not protect individual workers conducting asbestos abatement or provide instructions for how asbestos abatement projects should proceed.

Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry

The Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry (federal OSHA, 29 CFR 1926.1101) regulates asbestos exposure in the work place. This standard includes both persons working in a building containing ACMs and asbestos abatement workers and contractors. The Asbestos Standard for Construction (Construction Standard) regulates the following for abatement workers and contractors:

• Protection of workers and the public during the removal

• Medical surveillance requirements for workers

• Detailed requirements for how asbestos is to be removed

• Training requirements for abatement personnel.

6.2 Regulatory Overview for Lead-Based Paint

EPA, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), define LBPs as paints containing greater than 0.5 percent lead by weight or 5,000 ppm or 1 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2) total lead. Federal OSHA (Lead Construction Standard) regulations define “lead-based paint,” and refer to the EPA and HUD numbers cited above.

The federal OSHA Lead Construction Standard specifies a Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for worker exposure to airborne lead particles of 50 mg/cm3 of air for an 8-hour, time-weighted average. The federal OSHA Lead Construction Standard also lists an action level of 30 mg/cm3 for an 8-hour, time-weighted average. Therefore, demolition activities that include materials with lead at any concentration could, under certain circumstances, trigger federal OSHA regulations.

7.0 ABATEMENT COST ESTIMATES

Estimated costs asbestos abatement are summarized in Table 4. Estimated costs for paint stabilization are summarized in Table 5.

TABLE 4

ACM ABATEMENT COST ESTIMATES

Material Location Unit Rate1 Quantity2 Abatement Cost Estimate

White sealant over tar Upper roof, center fan $5.00 to $15.00/ft2 12 ft2 $60 to $180

Fire door (assumed) Corridor entry doors throughout $20 each 8 count $160

Notes ACM Asbestos-containing material

1 Rate and cost estimate is based on nondescript contractor solicitation. Fees may not be inclusive of all costs associated with material removal, including; labor rates, materials, or equipment. Rates may also vary based on means and methods used by contractor.

2 Estimated quantity requires field verification ft2 Square feet

Estimated costs for stabilization of LCP are summarized in Table 5.

TABLE 5

LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT STABILIZATION / LEAD COST ESTIMATE

Material Location Unit Rate1 Quantity Damaged2

Stabilization Cost Estimate

Paint, Tan over metal Stair hand rail $6.00 to 12.00/ft2 <2 ft2 $12 to $24

Paint, white over metal and wood

Interior door jambs and frames

$6.00 to 12.00/ft2 <5 ft2 $30 to $60

Notes:

1 Rate and cost estimate is based on nondescript contractor solicitation. Fees may not be inclusive of all costs associated with material removal, including; labor rates, materials, or equipment. Rates may also vary based on means and methods used by contractor.

2 Estimated quantity requires field verification ft2 Square feett

8.0 LIMITATIONS

Only minor demolition of materials (destructive sampling) was employed during the demolition survey, which limited the inspection for suspect materials. Thus, additional suspect materials could be present in walls, voids, attics, equipment chases, subsurface utilities, and in other concealed areas. Specifically, hot water supply and return piping originates from adjacent structure (Building 265) in a subsurface chase and services the site structure. Although not observed, suspect asbestos pipe insulation and hard joints are expected to be present within the subsurface chase and in plumbing walls of the structure.

If any suspected ACM/LBP are identified during the demolition processes that are not listed in the ACM summary table (Table 1) or represented on the LCP summary table (Table 2), the owner or contractor should employ Florida accredited asbestos/lead-paint building inspector to obtain representative analytical results, or as an alternative, should handle and dispose of these materials as assumed ACM/LBP and follow all OSHA requirements for protecting workers and building occupants.

Site Figures

P6 27

28 P3 P4

17T3

T1

ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATION

LEAD-BASED PAINT SAMPLE LOCATIONP#

T# TILE SAMPLE LOCATION

C

C A

D D

\I \G

\P a tr ic k _A

FB

_A

C M

.d w g /8

/2

:1

:1

P

M d a le

.v o n b u sc h

P5

T2

P2

P1

16 9

ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATION

LEAD-BASED PAINT SAMPLE LOCATIONP#

T# TILE SAMPLE LOCATION

C

C A

D D

\I \G

\P a tr ic k _A

FB

_A

C M

.d w g /8

/2

:2

:0

P

M d a le

.v o n b u

UPPER LOWER

R3

R8

R13

R11

R12

R10

R2

R7

R5

R4

R9

R1

R6

ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATION#

C

C A

D D

\I \G

\P a tr ic k _A

FB

_A

C M

.d w g /3

/2

:3

:1

A

M d a le

.v o n b u

Appendix A Survey Team Certificates

JONATHAN ZACHEM, SECRETARYRICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR

STATE OF FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION

ASBESTOS LICENSING UNIT

THE ASBESTOS BUSINESS ORGANIZATION HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE

PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 469, FLORIDA STATUTES

ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Do not alter this document in any form.

ASHBY BEE HOOVER

LICENSE NUMBER: ZA0000029

EXPIRATION DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2019

This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.

8008 SOUTH ORANGE AVENUE

ORLANDO FL 32801

Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=abe2d9aebc921d7606e535f973e941e2

Appendix B Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Forms for ACM Samples

December 31, 2018

Tetra Tech 2969 Prospect Park Drive Ste 100 Rancho Cordova , CA 95670

CLIENT PROJECT: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122

CEI LAB CODE: A1817553

Dear Customer:

Enclosed are asbestos analysis results for PLM Bulk samples received at our laboratory on December 26, 2018. The samples were analyzed for asbestos using polarizing light microscopy (PLM) per the EPA 600 Method.

Sample results containing >1% asbestos are considered asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) per EPA regulatory requirements. The detection limit for the EPA 600 Method is <1% asbestos by weight as determined by visual estimation.

Thank you for your business and we look forward to continuing good relations.

730 SE Maynard Road • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413

Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIH Laboratory Director

Kind Regards, ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL REPORT

By: Polarized Light Microscopy

Prepared for

Tetra Tech

CLIENT PROJECT:

LAB CODE:

TEST METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020

REPORT DATE:

TOTAL SAMPLES ANALYZED:

# SAMPLES >1% ASBESTOS:

PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122

A1817553

12/31/18

Asbestos Report Summary By: POLARIZING LIGHT MICROSCOPY

PROJECT: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122 LAB CODE: A1817553

Client ID Lab ID Color Sample Description

ASBESTOS

%Layer

METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020

A223676 White Drywall/Joint Compound None Detected264-DWJC-01

A223677 White Drywall/Joint Compound None Detected264-DWJC-02

A223678 White Drywall/Joint Compound None Detected264-DWJC-03

A223679 White Popcorn Ceiling Texture None Detected264-CTX-01

A223680 White Popcorn Ceiling Texture None Detected264-CTX-02

A223681 White Popcorn Ceiling Texture None Detected264-CTX-03

A223682 White Popcorn Ceiling Texture None Detected264-CTX-04

A223683 White Popcorn Ceiling Texture None Detected264-CTX-05

Layer 1 A223684 White Texture None Detected264-DWTX-01

Layer 2 A223684 White Drywall/Joint Compound None Detected

Layer 1 A223685 White Texture None Detected264-DWTX-02

Layer 2 A223685 White Drywall/Joint Compound None Detected

Layer 1 A223686 White Texture None Detected264-DWTX-03

Layer 2 A223686 White Drywall/Joint Compound None Detected

A223687A Brown Stair Tread None Detected264-ST-01

A223687B Clear Mastic None Detected

A223688 Brown,Black Flooring Remnant None Detected264-FR-01

A223689 Brown,Black Flooring Remnant None Detected264-FR-02

A223690 Gray Ceramic Floor Tile None Detected264-CFT-1

A223691 Gray Ceramic Floor Tile None Detected264-CFT2-01

A223692 Gray Ceramic Floor Tile None Detected264-CFT2-02

A223693 Gray Ceramic Floor Tile None Detected264-CFT3-01

A223694 Gray Ceramic Floor Tile None Detected264-CFT3-02

A223695 Yellow Carpet Adhesive None Detected264-CA-01

A223696 Yellow Carpet Adhesive None Detected264-CA-02

A223697 Yellow Carpet Adhesive None Detected264-CA-03

A223698 Tan,Brown Carpet Adhesive None Detected264-CA2-1

A223699 White Cmu Grout None Detected264-CMU-01

A223700 White Cmu Grout None Detected264-CMU-02

A223701 White Cmu Grout None Detected264-CMU-03

Layer 1 A223702 Beige,White Stucco Skim Coat None Detected264-STU-01

Asbestos Report Summary

PROJECT: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122 LAB CODE: A1817553

Client ID Lab ID Color Sample Description

ASBESTOS

%Layer

METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020

Layer 2 A223702 Gray Stucco Base Coat None Detected

Layer 1 A223703 Beige,White Stucco Skim Coat None Detected264-STU-02

Layer 2 A223703 Gray Stucco Base Coat None Detected

Layer 1 A223704 Beige,White Stucco Skim Coat None Detected264-STU-03

Layer 2 A223704 Gray Stucco Base Coat None Detected

A223705 Black,Brown Rolled Roofing None Detected264-RM-01

A223706 Black Rolled Roofing None Detected264-RM-02

A223707 Black Rolled Roofing None Detected264-RM-03

A223708 Silver,Black Base Flashing None Detected264-BF-01

A223709 Silver,Black Base Flashing None Detected264-BF-02

A223710 Black Curb Flashing None Detected264-CF-01

A223711 Black Curb Flashing None Detected264-CF-02

A223712 Black Curb Flashing None Detected264-CF-03

A223713 Black Penetration Sealant None Detected264-PS-01

A223714 Black Penetration Sealant None Detected264-PS-02

A223715 Black Penetration Sealant None Detected264-PS-03

A223716 Silver,Gray Pitch Pot None Detected264-PP-1

Layer 1 A223717 White Sealant None Detected264-WS-1

Layer 2 A223717 Black Tar Chrysotile 10%

ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSIS

Lab Code: A1817553 Date Received: 12-26-18 Date Analyzed: 12-31-18 Date Reported: 12-31-18

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: Tetra Tech 2969 Prospect Park Drive Ste 100 Rancho Cordova , CA 95670

Project: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122

Fibrous

White Drywall/Joint Compound

264-DWJC

-01 A223676

10% 5%

Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

5% 10% 70%

Cellulose Fiberglass

Paint Calc Carb Gypsum

None Detected

White Drywall/Joint Compound

264-DWJC

-02 A223677

10% 5%

Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

5% 10% 70%

Cellulose Fiberglass

Paint Calc Carb Gypsum

None Detected

White Drywall/Joint Compound

264-DWJC

-03 A223678

10% 5%

Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

5% 10% 70%

Cellulose Fiberglass

Paint Calc Carb Gypsum

None Detected

White Popcorn Ceiling Texture

264-CTX-01

A223679

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

10% 15% 75%

Paint Foam Binder

None Detected

White Popcorn Ceiling Texture

264-CTX-02

A223680

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

10% 15% 75%

Paint Foam Binder

None Detected

White Popcorn Ceiling Texture

264-CTX-03

A223681

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

10% 15% 75%

Paint Foam Binder

None Detected

White Popcorn Ceiling Texture

264-CTX-04

A223682

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

10% 15% 75%

Paint Foam Binder

None Detected

Lab Code: A1817553 Date Received: 12-26-18 Date Analyzed: 12-31-18 Date Reported: 12-31-18

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: Tetra Tech 2969 Prospect Park Drive Ste 100 Rancho Cordova , CA 95670

Project: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122

Fibrous

White Popcorn Ceiling Texture

264-CTX-05

A223683

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

10% 15% 75%

Paint Foam Binder

None Detected

White

264-DWTX

-01

A223684

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

5% 40% 55%

Paint Binder Calc Carb

None Detected

Layer 1

Texture

White Drywall/Joint CompoundA223684

10%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

10% 80%

Cellulose Calc Carb Gypsum

None DetectedLayer 2

White

264-DWTX

-02

A223685

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

5% 40% 55%

Paint Binder Calc Carb

None Detected

Layer 1

Texture

White Drywall/Joint CompoundA223685

10%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

10% 80%

Cellulose Calc Carb Gypsum

None DetectedLayer 2

White

264-DWTX

-03

A223686

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

5% 40% 55%

Paint Binder Calc Carb

None Detected

Layer 1

Texture

White Drywall/Joint CompoundA223686

10%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

10% 80%

Cellulose Calc Carb Gypsum

None DetectedLayer 2

Lab Code: A1817553 Date Received: 12-26-18 Date Analyzed: 12-31-18 Date Reported: 12-31-18

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: Tetra Tech 2969 Prospect Park Drive Ste 100 Rancho Cordova , CA 95670

Project: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122

Fibrous

Brown Stair Tread264-ST-01

A223687A Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

100% Vinyl None Detected

Clear MasticA223687B Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

100% Mastic None Detected

Brown,Black Flooring Remnant264-FR-01

A223688 25% 5%

Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

50% 20% <1%

Cellulose Fiberglass

Vinyl Binder Mastic

None Detected

Brown,Black Flooring Remnant264-FR-02

A223689 25% 5%

Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

50% 20% <1%

Cellulose Fiberglass

Vinyl Binder Mastic

None Detected

Gray Ceramic Floor Tile264-CFT-1

A223690 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Tightly Bound

85% 15%

Binder Silicates

None Detected

Gray Ceramic Floor Tile264-CFT2-01

A223691 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Tightly Bound

70% 30%

Binder Silicates

None Detected

Gray Ceramic Floor Tile264-CFT2-02

A223692 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Tightly Bound

70% 30%

Binder Silicates

Lab Code: A1817553 Date Received: 12-26-18 Date Analyzed: 12-31-18 Date Reported: 12-31-18

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: Tetra Tech 2969 Prospect Park Drive Ste 100 Rancho Cordova , CA 95670

Project: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122

Fibrous

Gray Ceramic Floor Tile264-CFT3-01

A223693 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Tightly Bound

90% 10%

Binder Silicates

None Detected

Gray Ceramic Floor Tile264-CFT3-02

A223694 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Tightly Bound

40% 60%

Binder Silicates

None Detected

Yellow Carpet Adhesive264-CA-01

A223695 5%Homogeneous

Fibrous Bound

95%Synthetic Fiber Mastic None Detected

Yellow Carpet Adhesive264-CA-02

A223696 5%Homogeneous

Fibrous Bound

95%Synthetic Fiber Mastic None Detected

Yellow Carpet Adhesive264-CA-03

A223697 5%Homogeneous

Fibrous Bound

95%Synthetic Fiber Mastic None Detected

Tan,Brown Carpet Adhesive264-CA2-1

A223698 Homogeneous

Fibrous Bound

100% Mastic None Detected

White Cmu Grout264-CMU-01

A223699 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

5% 55% 40%

Paint Binder Silicates

Lab Code: A1817553 Date Received: 12-26-18 Date Analyzed: 12-31-18 Date Reported: 12-31-18

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: Tetra Tech 2969 Prospect Park Drive Ste 100 Rancho Cordova , CA 95670

Project: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122

Fibrous

White Cmu Grout264-CMU-02

A223700 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

5% 55% 40%

Paint Binder Silicates

None Detected

White Cmu Grout264-CMU-03

A223701 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

5% 55% 40%

Paint Binder Silicates

None Detected

Beige,White

264-STU-01

A223702

Homogeneous

Fibrous Bound

15% 45% 40%

Paint Binder Silicates

None Detected Layer 1

Stucco Skim Coat

Gray Stucco Base Coat

A223702 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

40% 60%

Binder Silicates

None DetectedLayer 2

Beige,White

264-STU-02

A223703

Homogeneous

Fibrous Bound

15% 45% 40%

Paint Binder Silicates

None Detected Layer 1

Stucco Skim Coat

Gray Stucco Base Coat

A223703 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

40% 60%

Binder Silicates

None DetectedLayer 2

Beige,White

264-STU-03

A223704

Homogeneous

Fibrous Bound

15% 45% 40%

Paint Binder Silicates

None Detected Layer 1

Stucco Skim Coat

Lab Code: A1817553 Date Received: 12-26-18 Date Analyzed: 12-31-18 Date Reported: 12-31-18

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: Tetra Tech 2969 Prospect Park Drive Ste 100 Rancho Cordova , CA 95670

Project: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122

Fibrous

Gray Stucco Base Coat

A223704 Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

40% 60%

Binder Silicates

None DetectedLayer 2

Black,Brown Rolled Roofing264-RM-01

A223705 30% 10% 10%

Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

30% 5% 15%

Cellulose Synthetic Fiber Fiberglass

Tar Silicates Foam

None Detected

Black Rolled Roofing264-RM-02

A223706 10% 10% 10%

Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

65% 5%

Cellulose Synthetic Fiber Fiberglass

Tar Silicates

None Detected

Black Rolled Roofing264-RM-03

A223707 10% 10% 10%

Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

65% 5%

Cellulose Synthetic Fiber Fiberglass

Tar Silicates

None Detected

Silver,Black Base Flashing264-BF-01

A223708 25%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

60% 10% 5%

Synthetic Fiber Tar Silicates Paint

None Detected

Silver,Black Base Flashing264-BF-02

A223709 25%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

60% 10% 5%

Synthetic Fiber Tar Silicates Paint

None Detected

Black Curb Flashing264-CF-01

A223710 25%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

60% 15%

Synthetic Fiber Tar Silicates

Lab Code: A1817553 Date Received: 12-26-18 Date Analyzed: 12-31-18 Date Reported: 12-31-18

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: Tetra Tech 2969 Prospect Park Drive Ste 100 Rancho Cordova , CA 95670

Project: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122

Fibrous

Black Curb Flashing264-CF-02

A223711 25%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

60% 15%

Synthetic Fiber Tar Silicates

None Detected

Black Curb Flashing264-CF-03

A223712 25%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

60% 15%

Synthetic Fiber Tar Silicates

None Detected

Black Penetration Sealant264-PS-01

A223713 20%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

65% 15%

Synthetic Fiber Tar Silicates

None Detected

Black Penetration Sealant264-PS-02

A223714 20%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

65% 15%

Synthetic Fiber Tar Silicates

None Detected

Black Penetration Sealant264-PS-03

A223715 20%Heterogeneous

Fibrous Bound

65% 15%

Synthetic Fiber Tar Silicates

None Detected

Silver,Gray Pitch Pot264-PP-1

A223716 Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous Tightly Bound

5% 95%

Paint Binder

None Detected

White

264-WS-1

A223717

Homogeneous

Non-fibrous Bound

100% Binder None Detected Layer 1

Sealant

Lab Code: A1817553 Date Received: 12-26-18 Date Analyzed: 12-31-18 Date Reported: 12-31-18

Client ID Lab ID

Lab Attributes

Lab Description

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHOD

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: Tetra Tech 2969 Prospect Park Drive Ste 100 Rancho Cordova , CA 95670

Project: PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122

Fibrous

Black Tar

A223717 Homogeneous

Fibrous Bound

90% Tar 10% ChrysotileLayer 2

LEGEND: Non-Anth = Non-Asbestiform Anthophyllite Non-Trem = Non-Asbestiform Tremolite Calc Carb = Calcium Carbonate

METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020

REPORTING LIMIT: <1% by visual estimation

REPORTING LIMIT FOR POINT COUNTS: 0.25% by 400 Points or 0.1% by 1,000 Points

REGULATORY LIMIT: >1% by weight

Due to the limitations of the EPA 600 method, nonfriable organically bound materials (NOBs) such as vinyl floor tiles can be difficult to analyze via polarized light microscopy (PLM). EPA recommends that all NOBs analyzed by PLM, and found not to contain asbestos, be further analyzed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Please note that PLM analysis of dust and soil samples for asbestos is not covered under NVLAP accreditation. Estimated measurement of uncertainty is available on request.

This report relates only to the samples tested or analyzed and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by Eurofins CEI. Eurofins CEI makes no warranty representation regarding the accuracy of client submitted information in preparing and presenting analytical results.

Interpretation of the analytical results is the sole responsibility of the client. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government.

Information provided by customer includes customer sample ID, location, volume and area as well as date and time of sampling.

ANALYST: APPROVED BY:

Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIH Laboratory Director

Greg Ruff

Appendix C Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Forms for LBP Samples

2969 Prospect Park Drive Ste 100 Rancho Cordova , CA 95670

12-26-18 12-31-18Analyzed:

LABORATORY REPORT

LEAD IN PAINT

Lab Code: C181061

LAB ID

Received:

CLIENT ID

PAFB - Building 264, 103IG6122Project:

Client:

PPM (µg/g) CONCENTRATION

% BY WEIGHT

Eurofins CEI 730 SE Maynard Road, Cary, NC 27511 Phone: (919) 481-1413 Fax: (919) 481-1442

ANALYSIS METHOD: EPA SW846 7000B

12-31-18Reported:

264-P-1 CA68118 <0.0035<35

264-P-2 CA68119 0.004949

264-P-3…