WOSB Attachment 2 Past Performance Projects Table 17Dec20.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Vertical Construction Multiple Award Task Order Contract - Women Owned Small Business Set-Aside
Solicitation number
W9126G20R0046
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance projects table and details of a federal contract opportunity for vertical construction multiple award task order contracts set aside for woman-owned small businesses. The past performance table requests information on up to 10 past construction and design projects for evaluation under the past performance factor. The federal contract opportunity is solicitation number W9126G20R0046 to award approximately four competitive MATOCs for vertical construction services to woman-owned small businesses. The Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers intends to use the contracts primarily for facilities in Texas, Louisiana and New Mexico with a maximum task order value of $16 million and minimum of $75,000, for an overall capacity of $116 million. Task orders will support sustainment, restoration and maintenance programs and a high percentage of projects are expected to be design-build in nature.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
NIST INFORMATION.docx DOCX document
am_1_20R0046.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 IDIQ Experience Table 4Dec20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 Past Performance Projects Table 6Jan21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MATOC Section 00 22 10 attachments 1 3 and 4 17Dec20.docx DOCX document
Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
W9126G20R0046 WOSB Vertical MATOC Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 Projects Table 4Dec20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1

Past Performance Projects Table - Attachment 2
Factor: Past Performance
Page 1 of 2
For each construction project listed below, provide a Construction Past Performance Worksheet (Attachment 3).
CONSTRUCTIONFacility TypeProject Value (*See Note)Project TypeProject Attributes

(Check all that apply)

Project NumberProject TitleContract NumberDormitory / BarracksDining FacilityClassroom / Instructional Bldg / LaboratoriesChapelOperations CenterWarehouse / Supply Support FacilityHeadquarter Building / Office BuildingVehicle Maintenance ShopVehicle Access Control Point / CheckpointChild / Youth Development CenterOther$1 million - $5 million$5 million - $10 million$10 million - $16 millionNew Vertical ConstructionRenovationSCIF construction - new or renovationNew HVAC /
HVAC RenovationNew Roof /
Roof ReplacementNew interior buildout / Interior RenovationLife Safety /
Fire ProtectionDesign-BuildContract completion datePercent complete

Proposal Page Number

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
* Note: Projects submitted outside of the specified project value ranges will not be considered relevant for project value but can be considered for other aspects of relevancy.
Past Performance Projects Table - Attachment 2
Factor: Past Performance
Page 2 of 2
For each design project listed below, provide a Design Past Performance Worksheet (Attachment 4).
DESIGNFacility TypeProject Value (*See Note)Project TypeProject Attributes

(Check all that apply)

Project NumberProject TitleContract NumberDormitory / BarracksDining FacilityClassroom / Instructional Bldg / LaboratoriesChapelOperations CenterWarehouse / Supply Support FacilityHeadquarter Building / Office BuildingVehicle Maintenance ShopVehicle Access Control Point / CheckpointChild / Youth Development CenterOther$1 million - $5 million$5 million - $10 million$10 million - $16 millionNew Vertical ConstructionRenovationSCIF construction - new or renovationNew HVAC /
HVAC RenovationNew Roof /
Roof ReplacementNew interior buildout / Interior RenovationLife Safety /
Fire ProtectionDesign-BuildContract completion date (provide design completion date for ongoing DB contracts)

Proposal Page Number

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
* Note: Projects submitted outside of the specified project value ranges will not be considered relevant for project value but can be considered for other aspects of relevancy.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .