Attachment 2 Past Performance Projects Table 6Jan21.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Vertical Construction Multiple Award Task Order Contract - Women Owned Small Business Set-Aside
Solicitation number
W9126G20R0046
Issued by

About this file

This document contains an attachment and federal contract opportunity related to construction and design services. The attachment provides a table for offerors to list relevant past performance projects for construction and design work. It requests information such as project value, type, attributes, and completion dates. The federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for multiple award task order contracts for vertical construction services set aside for woman-owned small businesses. The estimated total value for all task orders is $116 million, with a minimum of $75,000 and maximum of $16 million per task order. Services will primarily support facilities in Texas, Louisiana and New Mexico, including dormitories, dining halls, offices and other building types. Historically over half of task orders are for sustainment, restoration and maintenance projects through the design-build approach.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
NIST INFORMATION.docx DOCX document
am_1_20R0046.pdf PDF
WOSB Attachment 2 Past Performance Projects Table 17Dec20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 IDIQ Experience Table 4Dec20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MATOC Section 00 22 10 attachments 1 3 and 4 17Dec20.docx DOCX document
Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
W9126G20R0046 WOSB Vertical MATOC Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 Projects Table 4Dec20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1

Past Performance Projects Table - Attachment 2
Factor: Past Performance
Page 1 of 2
For each construction project listed below, provide a Construction Past Performance Worksheet (Attachment 3).
CONSTRUCTIONFacility TypeProject Value (*See Note)Project TypeProject Attributes

(Check all that apply)

Project NumberProject TitleContract NumberDormitory / BarracksDining FacilityClassroom / Instructional Bldg / LaboratoriesChapelOperations CenterWarehouse / Supply Support FacilityHeadquarter Building / Office BuildingVehicle Maintenance ShopVehicle Access Control Point / CheckpointChild / Youth Development CenterOther$1 million - $6.5 million$6.5 million - $13 million$13 million - $20 millionNew Vertical ConstructionRenovationSCIF construction - new or renovationNew HVAC /
HVAC RenovationNew Roof /
Roof ReplacementNew interior buildout / Interior RenovationLife Safety /
Fire ProtectionDesign-BuildContract completion datePercent complete

Proposal Page Number

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
* Note: Projects submitted outside of the specified project value ranges will not be considered relevant for project value but can be considered for other aspects of relevancy.
Past Performance Projects Table - Attachment 2
Factor: Past Performance
Page 2 of 2
For each design project listed below, provide a Design Past Performance Worksheet (Attachment 4).
DESIGNFacility TypeProject Value (*See Note)Project TypeProject Attributes

(Check all that apply)

Project NumberProject TitleContract NumberDormitory / BarracksDining FacilityClassroom / Instructional Bldg / LaboratoriesChapelOperations CenterWarehouse / Supply Support FacilityHeadquarter Building / Office BuildingVehicle Maintenance ShopVehicle Access Control Point / CheckpointChild / Youth Development CenterOther$1 million - $6.5 million$6.5 million - $13 million$13 million - $20 millionNew Vertical ConstructionRenovationSCIF construction - new or renovationNew HVAC /
HVAC RenovationNew Roof /
Roof ReplacementNew interior buildout / Interior RenovationLife Safety /
Fire ProtectionDesign-BuildContract completion date (provide design completion date for ongoing DB contracts)

Proposal Page Number

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
* Note: Projects submitted outside of the specified project value ranges will not be considered relevant for project value but can be considered for other aspects of relevancy.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .