Attachment_0009_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Questionnaire_18_May_2017.doc

DOC document 148 KB Posted

Attached to
CENTCOM Acquisition Support Services (CASS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9124J-17-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Sam Houston

About this file

Attachment 0009 Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to CENTCOM Acquisition Support Services (CASS), newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_0002_CASS_Pricing_Matrix_19_May_2017Rev1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0003_CASS_Pricing_Matrix-Task_Order_0001_19_May_2017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0001_PWS_18_May_2017_.docx DOCX document
W9124J-17-R-0002,_Amendment_0002.docx DOCX document
20170518_Solicitation_Q__A.docx DOCX document
I-B-7_Attachment_0009_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Questionnaire_5_May_2017.doc DOC document
I-B-7_Attachment_0005_FY-17_CENTCOM_CASS_Recomp_Solicitation_DD254_Pkg_27_APRIL_2017.pdf PDF
I-B-7_Attachment_0001_PWS_1_May_2017.docx DOCX document
W9124J-17-R-0002-0001_4_May_2017.docx DOCX document
I-B-7_Attachment_0002_CASS_Pricing_Matrix_26_APRIL_2017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
I-B-7_Attachment_0003_CASS__Pricing_Matrix-Task_Order_0001_26_April_2017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
I-B-7_Attachment_0010_CASS_Ordering_Guide_25_April_2017.docx DOCX document
I-B-7_Attachment_0009_Past__Performance_Evaluation_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
W9124J-17-R-0002_25_APRIL_2017.docx DOCX document
I-B-7_Attachment_0007_Specific_Relevant_Contracts_Sheet.doc DOC document
I-B-7_Attachment_0006_General_Order_1_go1c.pdf PDF
I-B-7_Attachment_0008_Letter_of_Consent.docx DOCX document
I-B-7_Attachment_0001_PWS_18_April_2017.docx DOCX document
I-B-7_Attachment_0004_TSIRT_Training_(002)_Afghanistan_BAF.pdf PDF
I-B-7_Attachment_0005_DD254_and__Attachments_for_Solicitation,_Signed.pdf PDF
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

W9124J-17-R-0002 Dear Sir or Madam:

1. The Mission Installation Contracting Command (MICC)- Fort Sam Houston, will be evaluating proposals for CENTCOM Acquisition Support Services (CASS) under RFP W9124J-17-R-0002. This requirement is for the contractor to provide six (6) different labor categories: Contract Specialist, Procurement Technician, Procurement Analyst, Information Technology Specialist, Industrial Property Management Specialist, and Quality Assurance Specialist. The scope of coverage is the CENTCOM AOR; however, the primary locations to be covered are Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, and Qatar.

2. As part of the source selection process, potential offerors’ past performance is being evaluated. The Past Performance Evaluation Team (PPET) would greatly appreciate your time and effort in completing the attached questionnaire. Please return completed questionnaires to Patrick Devastey at patrick.s.devastey.civ@mail.mil AND Maria Cachola at maria.d.cachola.civ@mail.mil no later than 26 May 2017, Subject line: “CASS Contractor Past Performance.”

3. Please use the following rating system and definitions to complete the Past Performance Questionnaire.

Rating
Description
Outstanding
Performance meets all contractual requirements and exceeds several contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished at a very high level. The contractor may have encountered a few minor performance issues for which immediate corrective actions were taken by the contractor and was highly effective.
Good
Performance meets all contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished at a noteworthy level. The contractor may have encountered a few performance issues for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were reasonably effective.
Acceptable
Performance meets all contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished at the minimum acceptable level. The contractor may have encountered performance issues for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were only minimally effective.
Marginal
Performance does not meets some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished at a level below the minimum acceptable level. The contractor encountered performance issues for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were not minimally effective.
Unacceptable
Performance does not meet many or most contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was either not accomplished or accomplished at a level far below the minimum acceptable level. The contractor encountered performance issues for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were not effective.

4. Comment freely in the spaces below the questions or on a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Both favorable and unfavorable comments are welcome.

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Past Performance Questionnaire

Instructions: Sections I through VII are to be completed by the assessor (Government/non-Government personnel that had experience with the Offeror on a previous relevant contract).

Message to the Assessor: Your assistance is requested by the MICC Contracting Office to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please email the completed questionnaire(s) to patrick.s.devastey.civ@mail.mil and maria.d.cachola.civ@mail.mil.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort).

Solicitation Number:
W9124J-17-R-0002
Project/Requirement:
CASS
Customer/Agency:
MICC

II. Current or Historical Contract Information.

FILLIN \* MERGEFORMAT

CONTRACTOR

NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract No

Type of Contract

Contract Value

Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role
FORMCHECKBOX

PRIME

SUB CONTRACTOR

Termination History (if applicable)

Convenience

Default Unknown

III. Assessor Information.

Assessor Name

Title

Organization

Phone Number

Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

(
Role
Period of Involvement

FORMCHECKBOX

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

FORMCHECKBOX

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

FORMCHECKBOX

Contract Specialist

FORMCHECKBOX

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

FORMCHECKBOX

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

FORMCHECKBOX

Quality Assurance Specialist

FORMCHECKBOX

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

FORMCHECKBOX

Other (describe):

IV. Performance Evaluation.

1. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to recruit the required number of employees on time to perform the requirement?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating:

If applicable, did the Government contribute in any way to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain:

2. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to recruit employees with the required technical competence?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

Please provide rationale for assigned rating:

If applicable, did the Government contribute in any way to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain:

3. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to mobilize at least 15 employees within one (1) year into the Middle East in 60 days or less?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

If applicable, did the Government contribute in any way to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain:

4. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to manage and renew employees SECRET security clearances?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

If applicable, did the Government contribute in any way to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain:

5. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to motivate and retain employees (in efforts to reduce employee turnover)?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

If applicable, did the Government contribute in any way to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain:

6. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to coordinate/lease appropriate employee housing and vehicles on time?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

If applicable, did the Government contribute, in any way, to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain:

7. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability in gaining business sponsorship and coordinating employee sponsorship in the Middle East?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating:

If applicable, did the Government contribute in any way to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain:

8. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability in working with, and process employees through, the CONUS Replacement Center (CRC) or equivalent center, for deploying civilian contractors?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

If applicable, did the Government contribute in any way to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain:

9. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s conformance to the terms and conditions of its contract?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

If applicable, did the Government contribute in any way to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain:

10. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s employees conforming to local and Government rules and regulations (i.e. International Agreements, SOFAs, and General Agreements)?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

If applicable, did the Government contribute in any way to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

11. Rate the overall effectiveness of the contractor’s quality control procedures?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

If applicable, did the Government contribute in any way to any of the problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain:

12. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to submit deliverables/CDRLs on time and in accordance with the contract?

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

VI. What is the overall rating of Contractor’s performance on the contract being assessed:

Rating:
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unacceptable
Response:
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

VII. General Comments:

Assessor’s Signature

Date

Please address questions regarding the use of this form to patrick.s.devastey.civ@mail.mil and maria.d.cachola.civ@mail.mil. Thank you so much for taking time from your busy schedule to complete this questionnaire.

Are you aware of other references that we could contact to find additional past performance information for this firm? If so, please provide any available contact information below.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .