OCT2026_NCSRM_IndusrtyDaySlides_PH1A SATOC FINAL.pdf

Industry Day Focus: Phase 1A FLOODWALL SATOC 29 October 2026

Norfolk District

NORFOLK COASTAL STORM

RISK MANAGEMENT

AGENDA

Opening Remarks MAJ Warner, Norfolk District Deputy Commander

Program Overview Chrissie Figueroa, Program Manager

City of Norfolk and USACE Partnership Kyle Spencer, City of Norfolk, Chief Resilience Officer

Phase 1A Floodwall and Pump Stations Phase 1A Floodwalls overview and status

Phase 1A SATOC Phase 1A Pump stations

Jenny Britt, Project Manager

Phase 1A Engineering Technical requirements by sub-phase

Stephen Reed, CSRM Design Team Lead, Engineering Division

Contracting Overview and Requirements Acquisition Planning and Strategy

Project Labor Agreement Pre-Solicitation Process and Procedures

Small Business Summary of Upcoming Contracts and Task Orders

Candace Lotomau, Contracting Officer, Chief of Contracting

Environmental Considerations and Constraints Chrissie Figueroa, Program Manager

Question and Answer Questions from Industry

Feedback, thoughts?

All

Closing Remarks

NORFOLK CSRM

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Chrissie Figueroa Program Manager

USACE

$6.2 Billion Project Storm-surge barriers Nearly 8 miles of floodwalls Nearly 1 mile of levees Nature Based Features Mitigation 11 tide gates 10 pump stations Home elevations Basement fills Commercial floodproofing

OVERALL PROGRAM OVERVIEW

BACKGROUND: FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT (FWOP)

Without Project

1.4% AEP

Note: Assumes USACE Intermediate RSLR increase of 1.45 ft. from 2016

AEP = Annual Exceedance Probability NACCS = North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study RSLR = Relative Sea Level Rise

With Project 2075

1.4% AEP

Note: Assumes USACE Intermediate RSLR increase of 1.45 ft. from 2016

AEP = Annual Exceedance Probability NACCS = North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study RSLR = Relative Sea Level Rise

BACKGROUND: FUTURE WITH PROJECT (FWP)

DESIGN STATUS STRATEGY BY PHASE

Phase 1A Berkley Bridge to

Campostella 1A Water Street

Contract May 2027 In-House Design

SATOC

for remaining floodwall FY28 In-House Design, Non-Federal Sponsor Design, and AE

Design

Phase 1A Pump

Stations Harbor Park:

City of Norfolk Award DB

Construction Contract 2026

Newton's Creek:

AE Design-Bid- Build

Phase 1B Town Point

Park/ Waterside

AE Design-Bid- Build

Phase 1C/D Ghent to Town

Point Park/ Downtown

AE Design-Bid- Build

Phase 2 Pretty Lake

Surge Barrier

AE Design-Bid- Build

Phase 3 Lafayette

Outer Surge Barrier

AE Design-Bid- Build

Phase 4 Broad Creek Surge Barrier

AE Design-Bid- Build

OVERALL PROJECT SCHEDULE

FUTURE PHASE CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE AWARD YEARS

Phase 5 – Non-Structural $500M – $600M FY27

Phase 1A – Newton's Creek Pump Station $100M – $150M FY29

Phase 1B – Town Point Park/Waterside $500M – $600M FY29-FY31

Phase 1C/D - West Ghent through Freemason $1B – $1.5B FY33-FY35

Phase 3 – Lafayette Surge Barrier $1B – $1.5B FY33-FY39

Phase 2 – Pretty Lake Surge Barrier $400M – $500M FY36

Phase 4 – Broad Creek Surge Barrier $500M – $600M FY37

Last Industry Day, February 2025

Feedback from Industry informed same scope contract benefits; Pump Stations are stand-alone and floodwall are separate scopes.

Smaller scope TOs/contracts are more acceptable.

Long lead times for significant utility relocations.

Phasing the floodwall construction allows for construction to start sooner.

Project Labor Agreement Considerations

Other Real Estate requirements

WHAT WE LEARNED SINCE LAST INDUSTRY DAY

PARTNERSHIP

Kyle Spencer Chief Resilience Officer

City of Norfolk

CITY OF NORFOLK PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS

NORFOLK CSRM PHASE 1A

OVERVIEW AND STATUS

Jenny Britt Project Manager

Overview:

6 Floodwall Segments Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Water Street standalone construction contract Harbor Park Floodwall: City design; SATOC with a seed project

PHASE 1A FLOODWALLS

PHASE 1A - FLOODWALL SATOC

USACE will administer the contract.

Acquisition will begin prior to utility relocations.

4-6 task orders planned.

SATOC Cost: $200-$300M Task Orders: $15M-$60M Award Seed Project – Harbor Park: June 2028

PHASE 1A PUMP STATIONS

Project Element Advertisement Scheduled

Award Cost Est

Harbor Park Pump Station (Design Build) City Contract

September 2026 January 2027 $40M-$50M

Newton’s Creek Pump Station and Tide Gate

(Design-Bid-Build) April 2028 October 2028 $100-$150M

Harbor Park Pump

Station

Newton’s Creek Pump

Station

Clay Ave. Bridge (Designed and

Constructed by City of Norfolk)

NORFOLK CSRM PHASE 1A

ENGINEERING ELEMENTS

Stephen Reed CSRM Design Team Lead

Engineering Division

PHASE 1A - WATER STREET

DRAFT

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAFT

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

PHASE 1A - HARBOR PARK PUMP STATION

PHASE 1A - FERRY DOCK

DRAFT

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

PHASE 1A - HARBOR PARK

PHASE 1A - HARBOR PARK

PHASE 1A - RAILROAD

PHASE 1A – NEWTONS CREEK PUMP STATION

PHASE 1A – SUBSTATION

DRAFT

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

PHASE 1A – SOUTH BRAMBLETON

PHASE 1A - SATOC

CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

Candace Lotomau Contracting Officer

District Contracting Chief

A SATOC was selected to ensure consistency throughout the Phase 1A Floodwall.

Starting construction soonest on the segments that ready for construction.

ACQUISITION PLANNING AND STRATEGY

Scope Phase 1A Floodwall SATOC

Contract Capacity $200-$300M

Contract Awards 4 to 6 TO’s

Task Orders $15M-$60M

SB Subcontracting Goal MR is ongoing.

Ordering Period 5yr base

Special Consideration(s) PLA

Acquisition Lead Time 12-24 mos

In accordance with EO 14063, Use of Project Labor Agreement for Federal Construction Projects, dated 22 January 2024, mandates PLAs for large construction projects within the United States, with an estimated contract cost of $35M or more.

What is a PLA?

- A pre-hire collective bargaining agreement with one or more labor organizations that establishes the terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction project and is an agreement described in 29 U.S.C. 158(f).

- Establishes terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction project, including:

• Provisions that bind all contractors and subcontractors to the agreement;

• No-strike, no-lockout clauses included; and

• Grievance/arbitration procedures.

- USACE will neither negotiate nor become signatory to a PLA.

- The Solicitation will require all prospective offerors to submit a fully negotiated PLA with its price proposal offer (RFO 52.222-33).

- The PLA would be incorporated into the contract at time of award.

PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT

The Solicitation will contain RFO 52.222-33 and the following language will be included:

Synopsis: Offerors shall submit an offer subject to Project Labor Agreement (PLA) requirements in accordance with RFO 22.502-2, General requirements for project labor agreements. Any PLA reached pursuant to the PLA requirements in the solicitation does not change the terms of the contract or provide for any price adjustment by the Government.

Solicitation: Supplementary Conditions Section 00 73 00: “Offerors shall submit a copy of a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) with its offer as set forth in [insert section] of this solicitation. Any PLA reached pursuant to the PLA requirements in this solicitation does not change the terms of the contract or provide for any price adjustment by the Government.

See RFO provision 52.222-33, Notice of Requirement for Project Labor Agreement, and RFO clause 52.222-34, Project Labor Agreement, for definitions and requirements pertaining to the use of a PLA on this contract.”

Submitted PLAs shall be reviewed for compliance with all statutes, regulations, Executive Orders, and agency/contract requirements as part of the responsibility determination, in accordance with RFO Subpart 9.1. Identified areas of non-compliance will be addressed with the offeror and corrected during discussions, if discussions are opened.

Please respond to Sources Sought questions regarding PLA. If more than 1 offeror, PLA will be required.

Award will only be made to an offeror with a compliant PLA

PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT CONTINUED…

ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

Submissions:

Pre-solicitation and solicitation publicized through…

Proposals must be submitted through the PIEE Solicitation module for consideration.

*Alternate forms of submission approved on case-by-case basis upon approval of KO.

Potential Evaluation Criteria:*

Factor 1 – Past Performance Factor 2 – Management Approach Factor 3 – Technical Approach Factor 4 – Small Business Participation Plan Factor 5 – Seed Project Price or Price Schedule

*Subject to change

SMALL BUSINESS

Size Standards http://www.sba.gov/size

SystemAward Management

(SAM)

http://www.sam.gov

Small BusinessAdministration http://www.sba.gov

KEY RESOURCES

MARKET RESEARCH:

SOURCES SOUGHT POST: 2nd QTR FY27

-Respond Not Later Than: 2 weeks from posted date

-PLEASE respond regardless of your socioeconomic category!

-ALL information you provide is considered when making any set-aside decisions, subcontracting goals, etc.

Deputy for Small Business Programs:

Stormie Wicks Stormie.B.Wicks@USACE.Army.Mil http://www.sba.gov/size http://www.sam.gov/ http://www.sba.gov/ mailto:Stormie.B.Wicks@USACE.Army.Mil

Project Element Scheduled Award Date

Cost Estimate Additional Notes

Phase 4 – AE TO Contract 2026 $3-7M 35% Design of Broad Creek Surge Barrier

Phase 1A East – AE TO Contract 2026 $3-7M 100% Design Campostella, Brambleton, and

Railroad portions of Phase 1A Phase 1A Harbor Park

Pump Station Construction 2027 $40-60M Design-Build contract by City of Norfolk

NCSRM Reviews – AE Contract 2027 $2-4M Complete Reviews for design on all phases of

NCSRM

Phase 1A Water Street -

Construction 2027 $50-75M Stand-alone Contract

Phase 1A Floodwall - SATOC Construction 2027/2028 $15-60M/task order SATOC w/Seed Project

Task Order #1 - PH 1A Harbor Park

SUMMARY OF SCHEDULED CONTRACTS AND TASK

ORDERS (NEXT 2 YEARS)

*Estimated based on timeline for utility relocations and real estate certification

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS AND

CONSTRAINTS

Chrissie Figueroa Program Manager

37ENVIRONMENTAL & CULTURAL RESOURCES PERMITS

NEEDED FOR PHASE 1A

- Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ) Water Protection Permit/Section 401 Water Quality Certification

– For impacts to waters of the US, including wetlands

- USACE Regulatory – Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 88-05 – USACE does not issue permits to itself for Civil Works Projects. USACE would need to be applicant/co-applicant

- VADEQ General Construction Permit/SWPP – Contractor requirement issued by City of Norfolk since DEQ has delegated their authority to the localities

- Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC) –The Attorney General’s office has confirmed that no permit is required for the flood control project and related measures. However, Baylor Grounds in future phases must be reviewed by VMRC

- Local Wetlands Board Permit – Permit is not required. Exempt from City of Norfolk

- Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act (CBPA) – Will need clearance and is issued by City and currently working with the city

- Land Disturbance Permit from City of Norfolk – Contractor obtains before start of construction

- Coast Guard – Permit or waiver, for bridge over navigable waters at Newtons Creek

- State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPO) - Submittal of Phase 1 Survey

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS SESSION

1. Please confirm whether USACE intends to award the SATOC to a single prime contractor who would then receive all anticipated Phase 1A task orders (currently identified as approximately 4 to 6 task orders), or whether individual construction segments and task orders may be separately competed and awarded to other contractors outside of the SATOC.

Answer: Single Prime Contractor. There is a separate action being solicited for PH1A Water Street which is procured as a stand-alone contract.

2. Please provide the anticipated procurement and construction schedule for the Phase 1A Floodwall SATOC, including the anticipated dates for issuance of the Phase One solicitation, Phase One submissions and shortlisting, Phase Two solicitation, proposal due date, SATOC award, issuance of the first task order, and anticipated construction

NTP.

Answer: There will be one Phase for the SATOC. See overall schedule provided with next question.

QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM INDUSTRY

3. Additionally, please provide the anticipated sequencing and approximate timing of the remaining 4 to 6 task orders over the five-year ordering period, to the extent currently known.

Answer:

QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM INDUSTRY CONTINUED…

4. What portion of the approximately $250 million shared SATOC capacity is currently authorized and funded, and is funding available for the anticipated first task order?

Answer: All is authorized and funded.

5. What type of procurement and source-selection method does USACE anticipate using for the base SATOC award? Specifically, will the procurement use sealed bidding or negotiated procedures, and will award be based on low bid, lowest-price technically acceptable, or a best-value? Are qualifications comparatively valuable, or are they only a pass/fail before price?

Answer: Negotiated procedures using Best-Value Trade Off.

6. Please provide the status of utility relocations within the SATOC limits of Phase 1A.

Which relocations are expected to be completed by utility owners or the City before each task order, and which utility relocations or installations are expected remain within the scope?

Answer: Utility conflicts will be relocated or removed before construction.

Stormwater rerouting to Ph1 pump stations are in scope. Also, any extension of services to the project area is in scope, and in some cases there are utility penetrations during or after construction.

7. What is the anticipated scope, magnitude, and construction duration of the first task order, and what are the current target dates for release of the base solicitation, proposal due date, SATOC award, and first task-order notice to proceed?

Answer: Information forthcoming in sources sought.

Q & A SESSION

CLOSING REMARKS

Michael Darrow, PE, PMP Deputy District Engineer for Programs and Project Management Michael.R.Darrow@usace.army.mil

(757) 201-7112

Brandon Harris, PE Chief, Engineering Division Brandon.K.Harris@usace.army.mil

(757) 603-7014

Sarah Taylor, PE Deputy Chief, Engineering Division Sarah.m.taylor@usace.army.mil

(757) 284-1524

Christopher Adams Chief, Construction Division Christopher.G.Adams@usace.army.mil

(434) 484-2887

Stephen Reed, PE CSRM Design Team Lead, Engineering Division Stephen.W.Reed@usace.army.mil

(757) 201-7740

CONTACT INFORMATION

Candace Lotomau District Contracting Chief Candace.c.lotomau@usace.army.mil

(757) 201-7131

Stormie Wicks, MBA Deputy for Small Business Programs Stormie.B.Wicks@usace.army.mil

(757) 201-7077

Jennifer Britt (Jenny), PMP Project Manager Jennifer.m.britt@usace.army.mil

(757) 201-7455

Christyn Figueroa, PE, PMP Coastal Storm Risk Program Manager Christyn.D.Wiederhold@usace.army.mil

(904) 616-6593

Raven Sasser, MBA Senior Contract Specialist Raven.D.Sasser@usace.army.mil

(757) 201-7136 mailto:Michael.R.Darrow@usace.army.mil mailto:Brandon.K.Harris@usace.army.mil mailto:Sarah.m.taylor@usace.army.mil mailto:Christopher.G.Adams@usace.army.mil mailto:Stephen.W.Reed@usace.army.mil mailto:Candace.c.lotomau@usace.army.mil mailto:Stormie.B.Wicks@usace.army.mil mailto:Jennifer.m.britt@usace.army.mil mailto:Christyn.D.Wiederhold@usace.army.mil mailto:Raven.D.Sasser@usace.army.mil