Bid_Inquiry_Contracting_Officers_Report_Flightline.pdf

Bid Inquiry Contracting Officers Report Closed Inquiries

Project: DLA - Replace Flight Line Aviation POL Yard at JBLE Review: W91236-19-B- 0020 (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 34 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec

8131558 Mechanical G-009 33 52 43 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sheet G-009, Note 2 requires stainless steel piping downstream of the issue Filter Separators.

Other drawings and spec 33 52 43 require int/ext coated carbon steel. Which piping is required downstream of the issue Filter Separators?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Potential Cost Impact. Interior coated carbon steel is required downstream of the filter separators. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 16 2019

1-1 Government Response. Interior coated carbon steel is required downstream of the filter separators. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757- 201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8131563 Mechanical 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Spec paragraph 2.5.1 requires pressure indicating transmitters, but none are shown on the dwg's. Are they required?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Pressure indicating transmitters are not required. Spec paragraph 2.5.1. will be updated in amendment. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 16 2019

1-1 Government Response. Pressure indicating transmitters are not required. Spec paragraph 2.5.1. will be updated in amendment. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO- CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strReportType=AllCOR&RequestTimeout=1000&pagStrRowSort=CommentID https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strReportType=AllCOR&RequestTimeout=1000&pagStrRowSort=Discipline https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strReportType=AllCOR&RequestTimeout=1000&pagStrRowSort=Sheet https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strReportType=AllCOR&RequestTimeout=1000&pagStrRowSort=Detail https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedReport&strReportType=AllCOR&RequestTimeout=1000&pagStrRowSort=SpecText mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131558 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131563 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131558 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131563

8131568 Mechanical 33 52 43.11, 33 57 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specs include duplicate requirements for several items. I.E. Flow Switches, Pressure gauges, Meters, collection tank and accessories, Truck Offload System, etc. Which spec is required to be followed?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Thanks for the inquiry. Specifications amendment will entail:

33 52 43.11:

* Replace paragraph 2.7.1.9 with the following verbiage: Valve must be of the two stage, float-activated, shutoff type that is an integral part of the drop tube used for pressurized fill systems. The valve must completely stop the flow of fuel into the tank, when the liquid level rises above 96.5 percent of the tank capacity.

Valve must be constructed of the same material as the fill tube.

33 57 00:

* Remove paragraph 2.15 thru 2.16

* Paragraph 2.6 FUEL METER: Remove following statement "Meter shall be equipped with a digital readout register mounted on the meter housing. Meter register shall contain a seven-figure nonsetback totalizer and a five-figure setback flow indicator without the tenth-of-gallon indicator.

** Replace with the following "Meter shall be equipped with a readout register mounted on the meter housing. Meters shall be provided with a two-stage set stop counter register, with seven-figure nonsetback totalizer and five-figure setback run indicator without the tenth-of-gallon indicator. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 16 2019

1-1 Government Response. * Replace paragraph 2.7.1.9 with the following verbiage: Valve must be of the two stage, float-activated, shutoff type that is an integral part of the drop tube used for pressurized fill systems. The valve must completely stop the flow of fuel into the tank, when the liquid level rises above

96.5 percent of the tank capacity. Valve must be constructed of the same material as the fill tube.

33 57 00:

* Remove paragraph 2.15 thru 2.16

* Paragraph 2.6 FUEL METER: Remove following statement "Meter shall be equipped with a digital readout register mounted on the meter housing. Meter register shall contain a seven-figure nonsetback totalizer and a five-figure setback flow indicator without the tenth-of-gallon indicator.

** Replace with the following "Meter shall be equipped with a readout register mounted on the meter housing. Meters shall be provided with a two-stage set stop counter register, with seven-figure nonsetback totalizer and five-figure setback mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131568 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131568 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131568 run indicator without the tenth-of-gallon indicator. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO- CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8131572 Mechanical 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 2.5.3 requires pressure sensors, but none are shown on the dwg's. Are they required?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Pressure sensors are not required. Spec paragraph 2.5.3 will be updated. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 16 2019

1-1 Government Response. Pressure sensors are not required. Spec paragraph 2.5.3 will be updated By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201- 7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8131581 Mechanical 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 2.7.1.6 requires a float switch assembly for the waste tank, but none is shown on the dwg's. Is the float switch assembly required?

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Overfill Prevention valve shall be provided for the collection tank, which has a manual float, however there is no dedicated float switch assembly required. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM

1-1 Government Response. Overfill Prevention valve shall be provided for the collection tank, which has a manual float, however there is no dedicated float switch assembly required. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8131592 Mechanical M-402 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131572 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131581 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131581 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131572 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131581

Drawings and specs for offload system do not require the typical 2" control valve and 2" globe valve for low flow offloading when A/E level is below the middle level switch. The truck offloading system will not operate correctly without the 2" offload control valve for offloading when the tanker truck is low on fuel. Will the 2" AB/CV be required to ensure the system operates correctly?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. 2" control valve and associated globe valve are required for correct operation (see forthcoming amendment). By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 16

1-1 Government Response. 2" control valve and associated globe valve are required for correct operation (see forthcoming amendment). By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8131596 Mechanical M-402 33 52 43.11, 33 52 43.14

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Spec 33 52 43.11, paragraph 2.9.3 references Spec 33 52 43.14, for the non-surge check/ Air Block Valve. Spec 33 52 43.14 does not include any requirements for the non-surge check/ Air Block Valves. Please provide requirements for CV/AB valves.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Refer Bidders to Non-Surge Check Valves are described in 33 52 43.13 paragraph 2.3.1. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 16 2019

1-1 Government Response. Refer Bidders to Non-Surge Check Valves are described in 33 52 43.13 paragraph 2.3.1. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8131602 Mechanical 33 52 43, 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131592 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131596 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131596 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131592 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131596

Specs include duplicate requirements for several items. I.E. Flow Switches, Pressure gauges, Meters, collection tank and accessories, Truck Offload System, etc. Which spec is required to be followed?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Please see response to bid inquiry 8131568. By:

Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On:

Aug 16 2019

1-1 Government Response. Please see response to bid inquiry 8131568. By: Kevin

8131613 Mechanical 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Spec 33 52 43.11 paragraph 2.9.6, requires a stainless steel flow meter with electronic register for the truck offload. This is not typical. Typically, an aluminum meter with mechanical register is required. What should be provided?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Provide a meter in accordance with 33 57 00 paragraph

2.6. See additional information in bid inquiry 8131568. By: Matthew

1-1 Government Response. Provide a meter in accordance with 33 57 00 paragraph

2.6. See additional information in bid inquiry 8131568. By: Kevin

8131629 Mechanical M-404, E-501, E-603 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 2.10 is written around a servo type Enraf ATG system for the operating tanks. Sheet M-404 shows a 4" nozzle for the ATG, which is typically required for a Veeder Root ATG system. The tanks do not have the required nozzles for an Enraf system, to include the servo https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131602 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131613 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131602 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131613 and separate water probe. The electrical drawings reference a Veeder Root ATG system. What type of ATG is required for the operating tanks? Veeder Root or Enraf?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Amendment forthcoming. Intent is for a Veeder Root

ATG.

33 52 43.11:

* Replace paragraph 2.10 with the following "Liquid-level indicator shall be the mechanically or electronically actuated type that can continuously monitor a tank's usable liquid level storage capacity. The system shall provide a digital readout of a tank's liquid level in terms of inches and gallons. The system shall be accurate to plus or minus 1/16 inch. The system shall measure water accumulation in inches from 3/4 to 5 inches off the bottom of a storage tank. Construct system components to be chemically compatible with the fuel to be handled. For each tank monitored, provide a sending unit that transmits the digital readout from a tank to the same electronic monitoring/alarm panel used for the leak detection system. Panel shall be a standard industrial SECTION 33 52 43.11 Page 4 Replace Fuel Distribution System DESC1501 enclosure. Panel doors shall swing left or right. The panel shall display the digital readout of each monitored tank on an LCD mounted exterior to the panel. The panel shall also have external controls to allow operators to toggle between information on the LCD without having to open the panel. Unit shall be Veeder-Root ATG TLS, or Government approved equal and compatible with the Base Fuels Automated System (FAS). By:

1-1 Government Response. * Replace paragraph 2.10 with the following "Liquid-level indicator shall be the mechanically or electronically actuated type that can continuously monitor a tank's usable liquid level storage capacity. The system shall provide a digital readout of a tank's liquid level in terms of inches and gallons. The system shall be accurate to plus or minus 1/16 inch. The system shall measure water accumulation in inches from 3/4 to 5 inches off the bottom of a storage tank. Construct system components to be chemically compatible with the fuel to be handled. For each tank monitored, provide a sending unit that transmits the digital readout from a tank to the same electronic monitoring/alarm panel used for the leak detection system. Panel shall be a standard industrial SECTION 33 52

43.11 Page 4 Replace Fuel Distribution System DESC1501 enclosure. Panel doors shall swing left or right. The panel shall display the digital readout of each monitored tank on an LCD mounted exterior to the panel. The panel shall also have external controls to allow operators to toggle between information on the LCD without having to open the panel. Unit shall be Veeder-Root ATG TLS, or Government approved equal and compatible with the Base Fuels Automated System (FAS). By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131629 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131629

8131692 Mechanical M-404, E-602A 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraphs 2.11 and 2.12 require independent level switches. 2.11 requires float type and 2.12 requires thermistor or optical type. Neither of these types of level switches are shown on the drawings. The electrical drawings shown the ATG is used to output the level alarms to the level alarm panel. Are separate independent level switches required as shown in the spec?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Independent level switches are not required.

Amendment forthcoming. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM

1-1 Government Response. Independent level switches are not required.

Amendment forthcoming. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting

8131730 Mechanical 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 2.13 requires a tightness monitoring system. The drawings do not show any requirements for a tightness monitoring system. Is one required?

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. A permanent tightness monitoring system is not required. A portable tightness monitoring system shall be used intermittently via lpd's and hpv's. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM

1-1 Government Response. A permanent tightness monitoring system is not required. A portable tightness monitoring system shall be used intermittently via lpd's and hpv's. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-

8131741 Mechanical M-403 33 52 43.14

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131692 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131730 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131730 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131692 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131730

Paragraph 2.3.4.1 requires a 4" truck fillstand control valve. The drawings require a 3". What size is required?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. 3" truck fillstand control valve is required. Amendment forthcoming. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM

1-1 Government Response. 3" truck fillstand control valve is required. Amendment forthcoming By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-

8131764 Mechanical 33 52 43.11, 33 57 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Spec 33 52 43.11, paragraph 2.14 and spec 33 57 00, paragraphs 2.13.3 and 2.13.3 both include requirements for Truck Fillstand overfill protection and ground verification units.

Which spec should be followed?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Follow specification 33 52 43.11 paragraph 2.14 33 57 00: Remove Paragraph's 2.13.3 thru 2.13.4 Amendment forthcoming. By:

1-1 Government Response. Follow specification 33 52 43.11 paragraph 2.14 33 57 00: Remove Paragraph's 2.13.3 thru 2.13.4 Amendment forthcoming. By:

Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27

8131803 Electrical E-601

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Drawings show the relay control panel and EFSO panel as part of the MCC. These components are not typically included in an MCC or provided by the MCC manufacturer.

Should a separate relay control panel and EFSO panel be included?

https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131741 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131764 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131741 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131764

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The controls provider will provide. They can get the bucket backplane from the MCC manufacturer and assemble in their shop and then field install the backplane and door-mounted devices. By: Matthew

1-1 Government Response. The controls provider will provide. They can get the bucket backplane from the MCC manufacturer and assemble in their shop and then field install the backplane and door-mounted devices. By: Kevin

8131845 Mechanical 33 52 43, 33 52 43.11

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Spec 33 52 43, paragraph 1.4.3 and spec 33 52 43.11 paragraph 2.2.2 both have requirements for a system supplier. Which spec should be followed?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 08 2019.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Amendment forthcoming. Follow specification 33 52 43 with minor clarifications for experience requirements.

* Remove sentence "Systems supplier shall have provided and installed at least three PLC-based, aviation pump control systems in the last six years all of which involved multiple pumps as well as automatic cycling of pumps based upon varying dispensing demands."

* Modify experience statement to read "Submit a letter listing at least three similar prior projects...." By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM

1-1 Government Response. Amendment forthcoming. Follow specification 33 52 43 with minor clarifications for experience requirements.

* Remove sentence "Systems supplier shall have provided and installed at least three PLC-based, aviation pump control systems in the last six years all of which involved multiple pumps as well as automatic cycling of pumps based upon varying dispensing demands."

* Modify experience statement to read "Submit a letter listing at least three similar prior projects...." By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131803 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131803 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131845 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131803 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131845

8131864 Mechanical 33 57 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 2.7.1.1 requires a hose end regulator. These are not typically used on a truck fillstand. Are they required?

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes, required. Base operators request to have D-3 nozzles at the new fillstands. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 16 2019

1-1 Government Response. Yes, required. Base operators request to have D-3 nozzles at the new fillstands By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting

8133165 Mechanical M-403, M-601 33 52 43.11, 33 57 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sheet M-601, Refueler Truck Fillstand Equipment Schedule requires a inlet-side strainer/air eliminator for the meters. Sheet M-403 does not show a inlet-side strainer/air eliminator for the meters. Specification 33 52 43.11, paragraph 2.6 does not include the requirements for a inlet-side strainer/air eliminator. Specification 33 57 00, paragraph 2.6 also includes requirements for meters, but does not include the requirements for inlet-side strainer/air eliminator. Do the meters require inlet-side strainers/air eliminators?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 09 2019. Forward request

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Meters do not require inlet-side strainers/air eliminators. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM

1-1 Government Response. Meters do not require inlet-side strainers/air eliminators. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-

8133205 Mechanical M-402, M-601 33 52 43.11, 33 57 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sheet M-601, Truck Offloading Equipment Schedule requires a inlet-side strainer/air eliminator for the meter. Sheet M-402 does not show a inlet-side strainer/air eliminator for the meter. Specification 33 52 43.11, paragraph 2.9.6 does not include the requirements for a inlet-https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131864 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131864 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:akyhn@bayfuel.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8133165 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8133165 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8131864 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8133165 side strainer/air eliminator. Specification 33 57 00, paragraph 2.6 also includes requirements for meters, but does not include the requirements for inlet-side strainer/air eliminator. Does the offload meter require a inlet-side strainer/air eliminator?

By: Andy Kyhn; Bay Associates; (757-422-0752). On: Aug 09 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Meters do not require inlet-side strainers/air eliminators. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM

1-1 Government Response. Meters do not require inlet-side strainers/air eliminators By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8147186 Electrical E-601 26 32 14.00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference Contract Drawing Sheet E-601. This sheet denotes a "100 kW" generator. However, Specification Section 26 32 14.00, Paragraph 1.2.1 states the service load as "80 kW". Please clarify the required kW rating of the generator.

By: Manny Gonzalez; Brite Electric; (7574523118). On: Aug 19 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Potential Scope Impact. Potential Cost Impact. 100 kW is the correct size. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. 100 kW is the correct size. By: Kevin

8147758 Electrical E-101

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Note 02 on Drawing E-101 indicates the electrical transformer, primary ductbank, secondary ductbank and conductors by Dominion Energy Virginia. Is the contractor responsible for the cost for this electrical work. If so please provide a contract person and phone number for Dominion Energy Virginia.

By: David Richter; Structural Associates, Inc. - Watertown, NY; (315-779-8878). On: Aug 19 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The contractor is not responsible for the cost of the work that is noted to be provided by Dominion Energy Virginia. By: Matthew https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8133205 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8133205 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:mgonzalez@briteelec.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147186 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147186 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:drichter@structuralassociates.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147758 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8133205 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147186 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147758

Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23

1-1 Government Response. The contractor is not responsible for the cost of the work that is noted to be provided by Dominion Energy Virginia. By: Kevin

8147785 Electrical E-101

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Notes 01 and 02 on drawing E-101 indicates Dominion Energy Virginia is responsible for the transformer, primary and secondary ductbank, conductors and site lighting. Please clarify the scope of work for Dominion Energy. Is the contractor responsible for the excavation, backfill, and/or pole bases for Dominion Energy Virginia's electrical work? Please clarify?

By: David Richter; Structural Associates, Inc. - Watertown, NY; (315-779-8878). On: Aug 19 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The contractor is not responsible for excavation, backfill, or pole bases for site lighting. Site lighting comprises only the lights shown on E-101. Area lighting or task lighting shown on other sheets is provided by the contractor. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. The contractor is not responsible for excavation, backfill, or pole bases for site lighting. Site lighting comprises only the lights shown on E-101. Area lighting or task lighting shown on other sheets is provided by the contractor. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757- 201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8152621 Contracting N/A N/A 00 10 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that the qualifying project data sheets and the price proposal are to be included together in one volume.

By: Bill Halsey; Structural Associates, Inc. - Watertown, NY; (315-463-0001). On: Aug 21 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes the qualifying project data sheets and the price proposal are to be included together in one volume. By: Kevin mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:drichter@structuralassociates.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147785 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:bhalsey@structuralassociates.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8152621 mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8147785 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8152621

1-1 Government Response. Yes the qualifying project data sheets and the price proposal are to be included together in one volume. By: Kevin

8152641 Structural N/A N/A 03 30 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 03 30 00 paragraphs 2.1.2 and 2.1.6.1 both state that the test results for the concrete may not exceed the specified compressive strength by more than 20%.

Specification 03 30 00,2.1.7 requires a maximum water-cement ratio of 0.45.

The local suppliers indicate that due to aggregate quality in the area most mixes average 5,000 psi with a higher water-cement ratio than that specified. Please clarify the maximum concrete strength requirement considering a maximum water cement ratio is also specified, meeting the maximum strength requirement may not be possible with the local materials. Either the water-cement ratio should be relaxed or the maximum strength requirement must be waived.

By: Bill Halsey; Structural Associates, Inc. - Watertown, NY; (315-463-0001). On: Aug 21

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Per ACI 318, the maximum water-cement ratio of 0.45 must be met given the exposure class of the concrete on this project. It is acceptable to deviate from the specified 20% over-strength limit requirement given the compressive strength of the concrete does not exceed strengths of approximately 6,000 psi. Anything exceeding that will be unacceptable. By:

Aug 28 2019

1-1 Government Response. Per ACI 318, the maximum water-cement ratio of 0.45 must be met given the exposure class of the concrete on this project. It is acceptable to deviate from the specified 20% over-strength limit requirement given the compressive strength of the concrete does not exceed strengths of approximately 6,000 psi. Anything exceeding that will be unacceptable. By:

Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 28

8155928 Mechanical 33 52 80

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Spec 33 52 80 calls for Internal Pipe Coating(Lining) to be fusion bonded epoxy, C213, with certification stating its suitable for immersion in aviation fuel. There is no manufacturer that will provide this certification. Can an epoxy coating system based on MIL-PRF-4556 be acceptable?

mailto:bhalsey@structuralassociates.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8152641 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8152641

By: Travis Arnn; Talon Industries, Inc; (817 265-5511). On: Aug 23 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. This is acceptable. MIL-PRF-4456 is now allowed in the latest UFGS [33 52 40 2.2.2 d. "Internal Pipe Coating (Epoxy Lining) for piping 90 mm 3.5 inches and larger must be internally coated with an epoxy coating in accordance with MIL-PRF-4556 and in accordance with Section 33 52 80 LIQUID FUELS PIPELINE COATING SYSTEMS."] By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402-995-2410) On: Aug 28

1-1 Government Response. This is acceptable. MIL-PRF-4456 is now allowed in the latest UFGS [33 52 40 2.2.2 d. "Internal Pipe Coating (Epoxy Lining) for piping 90 mm 3.5 inches and larger must be internally coated with an epoxy coating in accordance with MIL-PRF-4556 and in accordance with Section 33 52 80 LIQUID FUELS PIPELINE COATING SYSTEMS."] By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 28 2019

8156452 General 01 32 01 00 10

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) states that if the Contractor uses any scheduling program other than P6 that the Contractor must provide the Government with 2 computers and provide training for the schedule program.

Is this correct?

By: Kara Laskowski; Ocean Construction Services; (7572009590). On: Aug 23

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Primavera P6 is the preferred scheduling program. The contractor is allowed to use another scheduling program only if, "...Contractors must provide the Government with 2 computers and provide training for the schedule program...". Also the computers cannot use the Corps wide network so the computer will need to stand alone or the contractor will have to provide internet access. Note that the scheduling program used by the contractor needs to create a Standard Data Exchange Format (SDEF) file to import into RMS per requirements in Specification 01 45 00.15 10, paragraph 1.7.5. By: Matthew

1-1 Government Response. Primavera P6 is the preferred scheduling program. The contractor is allowed to use another scheduling program only if, "...Contractors must provide the Government with 2 computers and provide training for the schedule program...". Also the computers cannot use the Corps wide network so the computer will need to stand alone or the contractor will have to provide internet access. Note that the scheduling program used by the contractor needs to create a Standard Data Exchange Format (SDEF) file to import into RMS per mailto:tarnn@talon-industries.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8155928 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8155928 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156452 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8155928 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156452 requirements in Specification 01 45 00.15 10, paragraph 1.7.5. By: Kevin

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8156454 General 01 32 01 00 10 p 3.7

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that Progress Meetings will be weekly in lieu of bi-weekly

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Bids should be based on weekly progress meetings. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402- 995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. Bids should be based on weekly progress meetings. By:

8156455 General 01 35 29.13 p 1.5.1

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that the site SSHO must be an Industrial Hygienist certified by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The Industrial Hygienist requirement can be deleted.

However the SSHO must meet the requirements of EM 385-1-1 paragraph 01.A.17. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects Branch PPPM Division; (402- 995-2410) On: Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. The Industrial Hygienist requirement can be deleted.

However the SSHO must meet the requirements of EM 385-1-1 paragraph 01.A.17. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8156456 General 01 45 00.00 50

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156454 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156455 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156454 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156455

4. Section 01 45 00.00 50 states the QC Manager will have no other duties. Section 01 35

26.00 50 states the SSHO can't be the QC Manager. Can the Superintendent be the SSHO or will 3 people be required to fill the positions?

By: Kara Laskowski; Ocean Construction Services; (7572009590). On: Aug 23 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The SSHO may also serve as the superintendent. By:

Aug 23 2019

1-1 Government Response. The SSHO may also serve as the superintendent. By:

8156457 General 01 4500.15 10

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 01 45 00.15 10. Please confirm that this project will require using the RMS system.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. RMS system is required. By: Matthew

1-1 Government Response. RMS system is required. By: Kevin

8156459 General 01 45 35 p 3.1.2b

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

6. Section 01 45 35 Paragraph 3.1.2 b. Please confirm the Special Inspectors must attend all preparatory phase meetings related to the DFOW.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes. The special inspectors must attend all preparatory phase meetings related to the DFOW. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156456 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156457 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kevin.e.comegys@usace.army.mil mailto:kara.laskowski@ocsinc.us https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156459 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156456 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156457 https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156459

1-1 Government Response. Yes. The special inspectors must attend all preparatory phase meetings related to the DFOW. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 27 2019

8156872 Contracting 00 10 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference Bid Item No. 0007 for Contaminated Soils Removal in the bid schedule.

There are two price breakouts required for "Quantity 0 to 100 (estimated)" cubic yards and "Quantity 101 to 200 (estimated)" cubic yards. The quantities listed below that are 100 CY and 200 CY respectively. If a total is taken of the 100 CY and 200 CY, a total of 300 CY would be priced.

Shouldn't the maximum price be based on 200 CY total as "Quantity 101 to 200 (estimated)" suggests? Should Bid Item No. 0007 require pricing for the first 100 CY encountered and then an additional price for another 100 CY encountered for 200 CY total?

Please clarify

By: Brendan Hanna; Structural Associates, Inc.; (3157798878). On: Aug 23

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Stated a different way, the requested price breakdown structure is as follows: within the first 100 Cubic Yard(CY)s, what is the "unit price" for 1CY and what is the "extended price" for 100CYs. Within the second 100CYs, what is the "unit price" for 1CY and what is the "extended price" for 100CYs. Finally, what is the "total" price for 200CYs. By: Matthew

1-1 Government Response. Amendment 01 clarifies the quantity for CLIN 0007

0 to 100 CY Unit price _______ Extended price ______ Total price _______ By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757- 201-7310) On: Aug 28 2019

8156878 Contracting 00 10 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference Bid Item No. 0008 for Contaminated Soils Removal in the bid schedule, similar to Item No. 0007.

mailto:bhanna@structuralassociates.com https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156872 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156872

There are two price breakouts required for "Quantity 0 to 100 (estimated)" cubic yards and "Quantity 101 to 200 (estimated)" cubic yards. The quantities listed below that are 100 CY and 200 CY respectively. If a total is taken of the 100 CY and 200 CY, a total of 300 CY would be priced.

Shouldn't the maximum price be based on 200 CY total as "Quantity 101 to 200 (estimated)" suggests? Should Bid Item No. 0007 require pricing for the first 100 CY encountered and then an additional price for another 100 CY encountered for 200 CY total?

Please clarify

By: Brendan Hanna; Structural Associates, Inc.; (3157798878). On: Aug 23 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Stated a different way, the requested price breakdown structure is as follows: within the first 100 Cubic Yard(CY)s, what is the "unit price" for 1CY and what is the "extended price" for 100CYs. Within the second 100CYs, what is the "unit price" for 1CY and what is the "extended price" for 100CYs. Finally, what is the "total" price for 200CYs. By: Matthew

1-1 Government Response. Amendment 01 clarifies the quantities for pricing

0 to 100 CY Unit price ______ Extended price _______ Total price _______

101 to 200 CY Unit price ______ Extended Price ________ Total Price __________ By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757-201-7310) On: Aug 28 2019

8156901 Contracting 00 10 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference Bid Item No. 0009 for Contaminated Groundwater Removal in the bid schedule.

There are two price breakouts required for "First five (5) 5,000 gallon Frac Tanks 0 to 5 (estimated)" and "Over five (5) 5,000 gal Frac tanks 6 to 15 (estimated)". The quantities listed below that are 5 Frac tanks and 6 Frac tanks respectively. If a total is taken of the 5 Frac tanks and 6 Frac tanks, a total of 11 tanks would be priced.

https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156878 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156878

Should the pricing instead be based on the first 5 Frac tanks and then an additional 10 Frac Tanks for a total of 15 Frac tanks?

Please clarify

By: Brendan Hanna; Structural Associates, Inc.; (3157798878). On: Aug 23 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Maybe clarifying with the below text will clear up the confusion. The requested price breakdown structure is as follows: within the first five (qty 5) 5,000gal Frac Tanks (0-5 Frac Tanks), what is the "unit price" for one 5,000 Frac Tank (qty 1) and what is the "extended price" for five (qty 5) total 5,000gal Frac Tanks. Then, for more than five Frac Tanks, what is the "unit price" for one 5,000 Frac Tank (qty 1) and what is the "extended price" for ten (qty 10) total 5,000 Frac Tanks (6-10 Frac Tanks). Finally, what is the "total" price for fifteen (qty 15) 5,000gal Frac Tanks. By: Matthew Olijnek; Special Projects

1-1 Government Response. Amendment 01 clarifies the quantity for pricing, please see Amendment 01. By: Kevin Comegys; CENAO-CT Contracting Office; (757- 201-7310) On: Aug 28 2019

Report Complete https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156901 mailto:matthew.a.olijnek@usace.army.mil https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicCommentReportEmail&PKeyComment=8156901