SOLICITATION_AMENDMENT_1_-_W911SG-18-R-0068.pdf

0011148631

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The reason for this amendment is to:

1. Change the site visit date from 20 August 2018 to 21 August 2018 @0730.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911SG18R0068

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Aug-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Aug-2018

CODE

MICC- FT BLISS

ISSUING OFFICE

FORT BLISS TX 79916-6812

W911SG 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911SG18R0068

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The 'issued by' organization has changed from

W6QM MICC-FT BLISS

111 BLDG 2021

1733 PLEASONTON ROAD

FORT BLISS TX 79916-6812

to

MICC- FT BLISS

ISSUING OFFICE

FORT BLISS TX 79916-6812

The organization for offers to be sent to has changed from

W6QM MICC-FT BLISS

111 BLDG 2021

1733 PLEASONTON ROAD

FORT BLISS TX 79916-6812

to

MICC- FT BLISS

ISSUING OFFICE

FORT BLISS TX 79916-6812

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. POINT OF CONTACT (POC):

SSG Rafael g. Alamedapabon, Contract Specialist Tel: 915-568-1484 Email:rafael.g.alamedapabon.mil@mail.mil

2. COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS: This procurement is a 100% Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses set-aside acquisition.

3. SITE VISIT: The Government has scheduled a one day site visit on 21 August 2018 at 7:30 am.

a. We will meet at the parking lot of BLDG 102, located at Headquarters Ave and Springfield Street. The flag pole in front of building 100, Building 102 is just north of Building 100. Please arrive early enough to facilitate going through either access control point (El Paso or Las Cruces/Alamogordo Gate) to receive a vehicle pass. You will need to provide a driver's license, vehicle registration and proof of insurance in order to receive a vehicle security pass, the purpose of the site visit is to provide the contractor insight into the job requirements.

(http://www.wsmr.army.mil/testcenter/Pages/WhereWeAre.aspx)

b. Firms who wish to attend the site visit shall provide the name(s), company name, position title, telephone number, email address and mailing address of all attendees via e-mail to rafael.g.alamedapabon.mil@mail.mil no later than 1:00 pm MST on 17 August 2018.

c. The site visit is limited to a maximum of two (2) attendees per company. Contractor representatives should be prepared to furnish identification if requested.

d. Individual or group questions will not be answered during the site visit. Potential offerors may submit written questions in accordance with number 4 (below) of this instructions to bidders section.

e. Potential offerors are not allowed to take pictures at the site visit. If pictures are required, the offeror may ask the designated Government representative to take any pictures requested.

Pictures will subsequently be cleared by the WSMR Security Office and then incorporated into the solicitation as an amendment.

Note: Remarks and explanations made by the Government representatives during the course of the site visit, whether orally or in writing, shall not change or qualify any of the terms or conditions of this solicitation. The solicitation can only be changed by a formal written amendment issued by the Contracting Officer (KO).

4. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI): All offeror inquiries or questions shall be submitted in writing electronically to SSG Rafael g. Alamedapabon at rafael.g.alamedapabon.mil@mail.mil no later than 24 August 2018 at 16:00 MST. An amendment will then be issued with all questions and answers. **After the due date no additional RFI’s will be answered**

5. PROPOSAL DUE DATE: Proposals are due no later than 09:00 MST on 10 September 2018. Proposals shall be emailed to rafael.g.alamedapabon.mil@mail.mil. Proposals SHALL include the following in order to be considered (failure to include all line items shall be cause for rejection of the offer):

a. Cover sheet on company letterhead with your DUNS number, CAGE code, Tax ID, and primary point of contact information;

b. Signed and completed Standard Form 1442 along with any amendments;

c. Letter from bonding company indicating offeror’s ability to obtain performance and payment bonds in the amount of their offer;

d. Technical approach, managerial approach, and quality control plan per Evaluation factors; and

e. Past Performance per Evaluation Factors.

Please note that all correspondence via e-mail shall contain a subject line that reads, “WSMR Mar Wel W911SG-18-R-0068, Company Name”. If sending attachments via e-mail, ensure only .pdf, .doc or .xls documents are sent. In the body of the email please ensure to list the number of attachments submitted. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to verify all emails along with all attachments are received by the Contract Specialist listed above.

6. BONDING REQUIREMENTS:

a. Performance and Payment Bonds:

(1) The penal amount of the bonds shall be 100 percent of the awarded price.

(2) The Government may require additional bond protection when a contract price is increased. The increase in protection shall generally equal 100 percent of the increase in contract price. The Government may secure additional protection by directing the contractor to increase the penal amount of the existing bond or obtain an additional bond.

b. Offer Guarantee:

(1) An Offer Guarantee is not required. Instead of submitting an Offer Guarantee, offerors are to submit a letter from their bonding company indicating the offerors ability to obtain performance and payment bonds in the amount of their proposal price.

7. SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM): Offeror must be registered in the database IAW FAR 52.204-7 in order to be awarded a contract and have the applicable NAICS code listed in FAR 52.219-1(c), Small Business Program Representations (Alternate I), Representations.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation using the evaluation method “Lowest Price Technically Acceptable.” This method is appropriate when best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable offer with the lowest evaluated reasonable price. Offers will be evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-price factors. Evaluation factors and significant sub factors that establish the requirements of acceptability are set forth below. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated reasonable price of proposals meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors (FAR 15.101-2). The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from price, technical and past performance. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. The Government reserves the right to waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received. If a minor clerical error has occurred, then the offeror may be given an opportunity to correct the minor error within the constraints of the "clarifications" process.

This solicitation is for a firm, fixed price construction contract. Award shall be made to the technically acceptable offer that provides the lowest reasonable price. The Government intends to award a contract to one offeror deemed responsible in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 9.1).

Offerors are required to submit technical proposals addressing the Evaluation Factors and Sub- Factors identified. The procurement is being conducted utilizing the Lowest Price Technically

Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process in accordance with FAR 15.101-2. Proposal will be evaluated for acceptability, but not ranked, using the non-price evaluation factors. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated reasonable price of proposals meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors. There shall be no trade-offs. Offers evaluated as not Technically Acceptable will not be eligible for award, regardless of price.

The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by the solicitation. The Government will rely on such information for the award of the contract. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions will require prior Contracting Officer's approval.

The offeror shall be held responsible for the validity of all information supplied in the proposal, including the information provided by potential subcontractors. Should subsequent investigation disclose that the facts and conditions were not as stated, the proposal may be rejected.

To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub-factors. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of two (2) separate parts; Part I –Technical Proposal - Part II - Price Proposal.

The Government’s technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each sub-factor. Any factor or sub-factor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable.

Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, at time of award, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

Part I – Technical Proposal

This solicitation requires the evaluation of technical factors and past performance.

Factor 1: Technical Approach – Technical Approach will be evaluated as “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”. To be acceptable the offeror’s submission must adequately address the

TABLE 1 - TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

technical requirements of the SOW and Construction Drawings. Adequately addressing the technical requirements of the SOW and Construction Drawings means that the offeror’s submission if executed as written, will result in the final product detailed in the SOW and Construction Drawing.

Factor 2: Management Approach – Management will be evaluated as “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”. To be acceptable, the offeror’s submission must detail their plan to comply with the following requirements detailed in the SOW: timelines, installation access and security requirements, safety requirements, environmental quality program requirements, and employee training requirements.

Factor 3: Quality Control – Quality Control will be evaluated as “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”. To be acceptable, the offeror’s submission must include a quality control plan that meets or exceeds the standard as described in the SOW. There will be no tradeoff for any submission which exceeds the standards established in the SOW.

Factor 4: Past Performance – Past Performance will be evaluated as “Acceptable or “Unacceptable”. To be acceptable, offerors must provide information demonstrating they have successfully performed as prime contractor within the last three (3) years* on at least one (1) construction project of equal or greater size and complexity and magnitude within the same or similar scope of work as identified in this solicitation. Past performance information shall be obtained by the Contract Specialist from any other sources available to the Government to include, but not limited to, PPIRS or other databases.

*The three (3) years shall be calculated from the solicitation issue date.

**Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.” Aspects of Past Performance Evaluation: The past performance evaluation results are an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertains to the requirements outlined in the solicitation.

Part II – Price

Prices will be evaluated for reasonableness as required by FAR 15.402. A price that is unreasonably low or high may endanger the proposal's opportunity for award of a contract.

Each proposal shall be evaluated to ensure that all information provided in the RFP has been addressed, is accurate and complete.

(End of Summary of Changes)