Amendment00006W911SF13R0004USTWashRackFBGA7Mar16.pdf

MISSION & INSTALLATION CONTRACTING CMD

WILLIE RICHARDSON

CONTRACT SPECIALIST, 706-545-8055

WILLIE.D.RICHARDSON2.CIV@MAIL.MIL

FT BENNING GA 31905

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

It is deem necessary and in the best interest of the Government to amend the solicitation as follow s:

a. Amendment is issued to reopen Solicitation No. W911SF-15-R-0004, revise section L & M and extend date and time for revised proposals, including including pricing to 30 March 2016, 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard Time).

b. Sections L & M are revised as follow s: Section L – Proposal Preparation Instructions A. Proposal Submittal and Inquiries.

Proposals shall be submitted prior to the closing date and time identif ied on the SF 33, to the follow ing address:

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-Mar-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911SF-13-R-0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Jun-2014

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Mar-2016

CODE

MISSION & INSTALLATION CONTRACTING CMD

MICC - FORT BENNING

6600 MELOY DRIVE

BUILDING 6, SUITE 250

FT BENNING GA 31905

W911SF 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE W911SF

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911SF-13-R-0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

MICC-Fort Benning ATTN: Mr. Willie Richardson (Solicitation #: W911SF-13-R-0004)

6650 Meloy Drive Bldg 6 Suite 250 Fort Benning, GA 31905-1300

1. The point of contact responsible for supplying additional information and answering all inquiries is the Contracting Officer via the Contract Specialist. All proposals regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing via email no later than 30 March 2016 11:00 a.m.

Eastern Time to usarmy.benning.hqda-aca.mbx.doc-offer@mail.mil, please include the solicitation number W911SF-13-R-0004 – UST/Wash Rack (in this format) in the subject line of the email, (ATTN: Willie D. Richardson). The Government will provide answers in writing via amendment.

1. The selection of a source for award purposes will be conducted utilizing source selection (negotiated) procedures as delineated in FAR Part 15.3. Offers will be evaluated using the criteria under revised Section M, “Evaluation Factors for Award.” Noncompliance with the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements may hamper the Government's ability to properly evaluate the proposal and may result in elimination of the proposal from further consideration for contract award.

2. The Offer. The submission of the documentation specified below will constitute the offeror's acceptance of the terms and conditions of the RFP, concurrence with the Performance Work Statement, and contract type.

3. It is the Government’s intention to award without discussions. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and prices in their revised proposal submission.

However, in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold discussions. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined and offerors notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency IAW FAR Part 15.306 (c)(2).

4. Instructions outlined in paragraph C below, prescribe the format for the proposal and describe the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. These instructions are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals.

5. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise deemed unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the mailto:usarmy.benning.hqda-aca.mbx.doc-offer@mail.mil

KO in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

6. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

C. Proposal Preparation Instructions

1. Offeror’s proposal shall consist of four (4) volumes: Volume I- General Contract Documents, Volume II- Technical Proposal, Volume III - Past Performance and Volume IV- Price Submission.

2. Proposal Format

a. Offerors shall submit an original and the number of copies listed in paragraph (c) below of their proposal.

b. Exceptions. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors and sub-factors (Sections A through M). Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. If the offeror finds it necessary to take exception to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly identify the applicable Volume and exceptions with a complete explanation of why the exception was taken, what benefit accrues to the Government (if any), and its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Offerors are cautioned that taking an exception may render the offer ineligible for award. This information shall be provided in the format below.

Table 1 – Solicitation Exceptions

Solicitation Document

Page/Paragraph Requirement/Portion Rationale & Impact

Section B, PWS, Section L&M etc.

Applicable Page & Paragraph Numbers

Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken

Describe the rationale and impact of the exception

c. The proposals shall be organized into four (4) volumes: each volume of the proposal should be separately bound in a three-ring loose leaf binder which shall permit the volume to lie flat when open. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked with volume number, title, copy number, solicitation number and the offeror’s name. The same identifying data shall be placed on the spine on each binder. All text shall be single spaced and printed black on white paper. Cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections; however, other proposal volumes shall not be cross referenced to the price volume. In additions to submitting hard copies of the proposals, digital copies shall be provided on CD-ROM disk in Microsoft Word, PowerPoint and/or Excel (2007 versions), as outlined in Table 2. The file name shall be “Company Name- Initial” for the first submission.

The file name of later submissions (if necessary), shall be “Company Name- Revision X” with X indicating the number of the revision. Page limitations are as follows:

Table 2

Volume

Title

No. Hard Copies No. Digital

Copies (CD)

Page Limit

I General

1 3 30

II Technical 1 3 25

III Past Performance 1 3 10

IV Price or Cost 1 3 13

(d) Proposal Limitation. The proposal shall not exceed the limits stated above. If the page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit shall be removed and returned, unread, to the offeror. The Government will not accept any changes to the contractor’s proposal after the closing date of the solicitation (See FAR 15.208 for further information regarding late proposals). If discussions become necessary, page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors.

(e) Page Limit Includes: All appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, drawings, etc.

(f) Page Limit does not include covers for volumes, tables of contents, glossary of abbreviations and acronyms, indices, title pages, cross reference indices, and section dividers/tables if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal. Pages will be counted if they contain any other information, i.e., diagrams, extraneous data, etc. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted.

(g) What Counts As A Page? A page shall be an 8 ½ X 11” sheet of paper. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Letter size and spacing requirements for illustrations and tables can be at the discretion of the offeror but must be easily readable. Fold-outs will be counted as the appropriate number of pages based on an 8 ½” X 11” sheet of paper. Margins shall be at least 1 inch on the top and bottom and 3/4 inch on the side.

The Contractor shall number each page in order to eliminate any confusion. In the event contractor creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages. In the event contractor creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

(h) Indexing. Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.

(i) Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with a definition for each.

3. Proposal Content

(a) Volume I – General. Offerors are required to submit a completed SF 33, (Solicitation, Offer and Award) (including acknowledgment of Amendments), Section B, and Section K. All final monetary extensions shall be in whole dollars only. Failure to follow the below Contract Proposal preparation instructions may cause your proposal to be deemed unacceptable by the Government. The General Volume shall be organized as follows and contain the identified information.

TAB A, Exceptions/Assumptions (if required) - Identification and explanation of any exceptions or deviations. Additionally, any assumptions used in the proposal preparation must be identified.

TAB B, Solicitation, Offer and Award - The SF 33 shall be submitted fully completed.

The offeror is cautioned that the SF 33 must contain an original signature in block 17 of the form. The contractor shall acknowledge any amendments to the RFP in accordance with the instructions on the SF 33 and with Section L, FAR 52.215-1(b), Instruction to Offerors— Competitive Acquisition. The offeror shall provide the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.

TAB C, Section B (Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs) - Section B shall be submitted fully completed and error free. It shall contain the offeror’s prices for the established Contract Line Items Numbers (CLINS).

TAB D, Section K (Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors) – The offeror shall ensure that Section K is submitted thoroughly completed with all blocks in each certification/representation completed truthfully and completely.

(b) Volume II – Technical Volume

(1) The Technical Volume shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims in the Offeror’s proposals. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. Your response will be evaluated against the Technical factors defined in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the PWS (including referenced publications, technical data etc.); statements paraphrasing the PWS or parts thereof (including applicable publications, technical data, etc.); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used, etc., will be considered unacceptable. The Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of its facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired. Oral presentation will not be accepted for this requirement.

(2) The Technical Volume shall, at a minimum, be prepared in a form consistent with the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and the evaluation criteria for award set forth in Section M of this solicitation. The section shall be prepared in an orderly format and in sufficient detail to enable the Government to make a thorough evaluation of the contractor’s technical competence and ability to comply with the contract task requirements specified in the PWS. The offeror shall address as specifically as possible the actual methodology it will use for accomplishing the PWS tasks. The volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

-Table of Contents -Exceptions/Assumptions If Applicable (Identification and explanation of any exceptions or deviations). Additionally, identify any assumptions used in preparing the proposal.

-Evaluation Criteria

(c) Volume III –Past Performance. The Past Performance evaluation will be accomplished by reviewing aspects of an Offeror’s recent and relevant Past Performance.

(1) The offeror shall include documentation regarding their relevant past performance as it directly relates to the work being procured under this solicitation. The offeror SHALL NOT go back any farther than three (3) years for the submitted data. The past performance data shall document a successful history of past contract performance.

(2) In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offeror’s Past Performance Volume and information obtained from other sources, such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) or similar systems, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and commercial sources. Offerors are reminded that both independent data and data provided by offerors in their proposals may be used by the Government to evaluate offeror past performance. However, the burden of providing thorough, complete, and current past performance information as requested in this paragraph remains with the offerors. Proposals that do not contain the information requested by this paragraph risk rejection or a less than acceptable performance rating by the Government. All past performance comments received will be taken into account and could affect the overall rating. The overall past performance evaluation is a subjective decision based on the whole of all data received. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

(3) The Government will provide a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment B) for Offerors to forward to its clients. The completed questionnaire shall be sent directly to Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist. The return address for the questionnaire is annotated on the form. Any questionnaire not returned directly to the Contracting Officer/Specialist will not be reviewed or evaluated.

(d) Volume IV – Price - The offeror shall complete Section B of the solicitation. It shall contain the offeror’s prices for the established Contract Line Items Numbers (CLINs). The offeror shall provide all data required to make assessments of fairness and reasonableness. The price proposal shall consist of the offeror’s costs to successfully complete the proposed work identified in the PWS. All final monetary extensions shall be in whole dollars only.

Attachments (A1-A5) shall also be submitted fully completed and error free with the aggregate sums of the respective CLINs for the Base Period and all Option Years.

The Government reserves the right to require the submission of Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data as it is deemed necessary to arrive at a determination of a fair and reasonable price.

The offeror shall ensure that no pricing information is displayed in other volumes of their proposal.

M-I EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

a. Basis for Contract Award

(1) This is a best value source selection and will be conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12 and Part 15. On the continuum of best value the resulting award will be based on Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA). Award will be made to a single offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements, and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, represents the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable offer.

(2) Trade-offs between cost/price and non-cost/price factors is not permitted. Unreasonably high/unrealistically low, unbalanced, inaccurate or incomplete price proposals may be the grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition. Proposed prices evaluated as unreasonable may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition.

(3) Offerors are advised that the Government may make award without discussions. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals. For a proposal to result in an awardable contract, the proposal must meet all PWS requirements, conform to all required terms and conditions and include all required certifications.

(3) Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations, certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors/sub factors to be eligible for award. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being removed from consideration for award.

(4) Award for all of the Work. The Government intends to award one (1) contract as a result of this solicitation. Offers received for less than the stated number of items listed in the Pricing Schedule will be considered ineligible for award. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions with offerors.

The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer determines discussions to be necessary.

(5) NOTE: Award cannot be made from a proposal that contains deviations from or exceptions to the Performance Work Statement terms and conditions or a proposal that fails to provide material information.

c. Evaluation Criteria

(1) EVALUATION FACTORS:

Proposals will be evaluated under the following factors and subfactors:

Factor I: Technical Capability Subfactor 1: Technical Expertise Subfactor 2: Staffing Approach

Factor II: Past Performance

Factor III: Price

Factor I: Technical Capability

The Government’s technical evaluation team will evaluate proposals to determine each offeror’s technical acceptability. The proposal must demonstrate a practical/functional approach that meets the requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Failure to meet the criteria will render the proposal technically unacceptable and the proposal will not receive further consideration for award.

Subfactor 1: Technical Expertise – The Offeror’s technical expertise will be evaluated to assess its technical capability, approach to successful contract performance. Offerors shall demonstrate mission capability by providing evidence of at least 3 (three) years of experience in the past 5 (five) years in performing services of similar type, size and complexity to those contained in this requirement. If the experience of a key subcontractor, Joint Venture partner, or team member in a teaming arrangement is submitted for evaluation purposes, clearly address the experience of those entities on previous and/or ongoing projects. In addition to experience, each proposal will be evaluated to determine whether it is feasible. The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s methods, resources and approach in meeting the requirements stated in the PWS can be performed in a timely manner and whether it provides the Government with a high level of confidence of successful completion.

Subfactor 2: Staffing Approach - The Government will evaluate the offeror’s staffing approach to determine whether it is feasible in terms of providing the required support set forth in the PWS and level of work specified in the PWS. The offeror’s staffing approach will be evaluated to determine the offeror's ability to recruit, hire, retain and manage personnel required to perform the services and whether it is feasible in terms of providing the required support as stated in the PWS. The Government will evaluate the proposed staffing plan to assess the offeror’s understanding of the requirement. The Government will also evaluate any innovative organizational or teaming arrangements; for its ability to provide personnel with the required knowledge, skills, and experience to fulfill the requirements of the PWS. The staffing approach will also be evaluated to determine the offeror’s ability to retain a workforce sufficient to satisfy the requirements stated in the PWS.

The Technical Capability factor will be assigned an overall adjectival rating at the factor level.

The technical factor will receive one of the adjectival ratings defined below

Ratings Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror performance is unknown

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Factor II: Past Performance

Provide information on past performance to include recent and relevant contracts (within the past five (5) years) for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers, and other relevant information).

Using information provided in the proposal, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and information from other sources such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, the Government will assess the quality of the Offeror’s performance on contracts of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the required services within the past five years. Offerors with no relevant present or past performance history shall receive the rating of “acceptable.” If adverse past performance Information is obtained, the offeror will have an opportunity to respond in writing to explain the adverse past performance information. This information will be considered in the evaluation.

The evaluation process of Past Performance will result in an overall past performance based on the information submitted from the Past Performance Survey. The following is a description of the ratings:

Ratings Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror performance is unknown

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Factor III: Price

The offeror’s price shall represent the offeror’s best efforts to respond to the solicitation. Any inconsistency between performance and price shall be explained in the submission. For example, if unique, innovative approaches are the basis for an unusually low price, the nature of these approaches and their impact on price shall be explained.

If an offeror proposes to absorb a portion of price, the offeror must also explain the impact on the estimated price.

Any significant inconsistency, left unexplained, may raise a fundamental question of the offeror’s ability to perform the task within the fiscal constraints thereof, may be cause for rejection of the submission. The burden of proof for price credibility rests with the offeror.

The offeror’s price submission will be evaluated considering the offer to the solicitation in the Pricing Schedule by adding the basic requirement plus all options for the total price. An offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the Pricing Schedule by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line Item Number to confirm the extended amount for each. The techniques and procedures described under FAR Part 15.404 will be the primary means of assessing price submission reasonableness. To be viable for award, offeror’s price must be determined fair and reasonable.

In addition, offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing exist when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items including the Basic ordering period and out-year ordering periods, is significantly overstated or understand as indicated by the application of analysis techniques. The Government will analyze offers to determine whether there are unbalanced separately priced line items or sub-line items. Prices submitted will be compared and evaluated to assure that a logical progression exits as related to price and quantity changes within each offeror’s response to the pricing structure in the line items Offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected if they lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (see FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding six (6) months of the offeror's final option period price to the offeror's total price. Offerors are required only to price the base and option periods. Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential six month extension of services period. The Government may choose to exercise the Extension of Services at the end of any performance period (base or option periods), utilizing the rates of that performance period.

Definitions:

Fair and Reasonable – A price is fair and reasonable if in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business.

Completeness/Accuracy – A determination will be made as to whether the Offerors have properly understood the proposal instructions and properly completed the price schedules. The proposals will also be checked for mathematical accuracy.

TAB B, Solicitation, Offer and Award - The SF 33 shall be submitted fully completed. The offeror is cautioned that the SF 33 must contain an original signature in block 17 of the form. The contractor shall acknowledge any amendments to the RFP...