W911SA25Q3029 - Amendment 1 - Vendor Questions and Answers.pdf

PDF 146 KB Posted

Attached to
Facility Coordinator and Site Commander Course Training for the 63rd RD
Solicitation number
W911SA25Q3029
Issued by

About this file

This is Amendment 1 to solicitation W911SA25Q3029, which extends the offer due date to January 14, 2025 at 2:00 PM CST and provides answers to 32 vendor questions issued by MICC Fort McCoy.

The Q&A provides key details about training requirements for Facility Coordinator Course (FCC) and Site Commander Course (SCC) for the 63rd RD. The training does not need to follow TRADOC or ADDIE standards, but must incorporate Army Reserve branding to be provided after award. The contractor must develop learning objectives and course content, with videos being mandatory but not interactive. The SCC requires full development as there is no existing framework, while the FCC materials are aligned with Army Reserve Facilities Management Standards. The courses will be hosted on the 63d RD DPW Sharepoint site. FCC sessions will be delivered at various locations including Grand Prairie, TX and Glendale, AZ, with alternate locations possible upon government approval. The SCC development and material creation costs should be included under CLIN 0006 as a one-time cost.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

0012152303-0002

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of Amendment One (1) is to provide anw ers to vendor questions and to extend the offers due date to 2:00pm CST on Tuesday 1/14/2025. All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.

POC for this action is Christopher Brow n, christopher.m.brow n67.civ@army.mil

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 08-Jan-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911SA25Q3029

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-Dec-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-Jan-2024

CODE

MICC - FT MCCOY

BLDG 1108 SOUTH R ST

FORT MCCOY WI 54656-5153

W911SA 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911SA25Q3029

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 10-Jan-2025 12:00 PM to 14-Jan-2025 02:00 PM.

The following have been added by full text:

RESPONSE TO VENDOR QUESTIONS

Vendor Questions and Answers Solicitation W911SA25Q3029

Q1. Does the training need to follow TRADOC Regulation 350-70, the ADDIE process, or any other Army instructional development standards?

A1. No training does not need to follow TRADOC Regulation 350-70, the ADDIE process, or any other Army instructional development standards

Q2. Are pre-determined Terminal and Enabling Learning Objectives (TLOs/ELOs) available, or will the contractor need to develop them?

A2. Yes, the contractor shall develop the TLOs/ELOs.

Q3. Is a Critical Task Site Selection Board (CTSSB) or equivalent process required to validate training objectives and content?

A3. No, a Critical Task Site Selection Board (CTSSB) or equivalent process is not required to validate training objectives and content

Q4. Are there specific skill gaps, knowledge areas, or challenges identified for Facility Coordinators and Site Commanders that the training should address?

A4. No, there are no specific skill gaps, knowledge areas, or challenges identified for Facility Coordinators and Site Commanders that the training should address.

Q5. What is the expected baseline knowledge or experience level of participants for both the Facility Coordinator Course (FCC) and Site Commander Course (SCC)?

A5. Basic Military Education for the position assigned is the minimum requirement.

Q6. Are current FCC materials aligned with Army standards, or will significant revisions be required (e.g., modernization or compliance updates)?

A6. Yes, they are aligned with the Army Reserve Facilities Management Standards.

Periodic updates will be required if changes have occurred.

Q7. Will contractors have access to historical participant feedback, evaluation reports, or lessons learned from previous FCC sessions to inform updates or improvements?

Q7. No, these are not currently available.

Q8. Is there an existing framework or content for the SCC, or does this course require full development?

A8. No, there no existing framework or content for the SCC, and will required full development by the contractor.

Q9. Are there specific critical tasks or job performance requirements identified for Facility Coordinators and Site Commanders that must be incorporated into the training?

A9. No, there no specific critical tasks or job performance requirements identified for Facility Coordinators and Site Commanders that must be incorporated into the training.

Q10. Should training materials follow Army-specific instructional design templates, branding, or presentation standards?

A10. Yes, the training material shall contain Army Reserve Branding which is not available to the public. It will be provided following contract award in a PowerPoint format.

Q11. Are there expected benchmarks or metrics from previous training programs that this effort should aim to improve upon?

A11. No, there are no expected benchmarks or metrics from previous training programs available.

Q12. Is there a government-preferred LMS for hosting SCC, or should contractors propose and implement their own system?

A12. No. The SCC Course this will be hosted on the 63d RD DPW Sharepoint site, it shall be developed and updated by the contractor and provided to the COR.

Q13. Are there specific LMS compliance requirements, such as SCORM compatibility, reporting features, or cybersecurity standards, that the system must meet?

A13. No, because the course content will be hosted on the 63d RD DPW Sharepoint.

Q14. Are there specific expectations for multimedia content in the SCC, such as videos, animations, or interactive simulations?

A14. Yes, video will be mandatory and shall be submitted to the COR in accordance with the PWS. Videos are not required to be interactive.

Q15. Should multimedia content align with Army branding, accessibility standards (e.g., Section 508), or design templates?

A15. Yes, to Army Reserve branding which is not available to the public. It will be provided following contract award in a PowerPoint format.

Q16. Will the government provide classroom facilities, AV equipment, and other resources for FCC sessions, or will these need to be arranged by the contractor?

A16. The answer to the question can be found within the solicitation. Please see PWS Part 3 Government Property (GFP) and Services and PWS Part 4 Contractor Furnished Items and Services.

Q17. Are the listed FCC delivery locations (e.g., Grand Prairie, TX; Glendale, AZ) fixed, or can alternative locations be proposed to optimize training delivery?

A17. Alternate training locations are identified in the PWS Table Tentative Course Location and Schedule in Part 5.3. The FCC alternate delivery locations may be utilized after award with prior government approval.

Q18. Are there specific guidelines or restrictions for instructor travel, lodging, or per diem expenses?

A18. The answer to the question can be found within the solicitation. Please see PWS

1.12 Contractor Travel Requirements.

Q19. What is the expected start date for delivering the FCC and SCC?

A19. Please see PWS Part 5, Subtask 2.2 for FCC course development; and PWS Part 5, Subtask 3.1 for SCC.

Q20. Are there specific deadlines for completing course development and delivering the first training sessions?

A20. The answer to the question can be found within the solicitation. Please see PWS Part 5, Task 2 for FCC training schedule; PWS Part 5, Subtask 2.2 for FCC course development; and PWS Part 5, Subtask 3.1 for SCC.

Q21. Are the seven annual FCC sessions evenly spaced throughout the year, or is scheduling flexible?

A21. Please see PWS 5.1 Tasks, Task 1 – Kick-Off Meeting, Project Plan, QA/QC Plan, Kick-Off Meeting for details.

Q22. Are there expectations for providing participants with post-training resources, such as refresher modules or help desks?

A22. No, there are no expectations for providing participants with post-training resources, such as refresher modules or help desks.

Q23. Will the contractor need to monitor participant performance after training or provide follow-up reports on the application of training knowledge in their roles?

A23. No.

Q24. What specific antiterrorism (AT), operations security (OPSEC), and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) compliance requirements must be incorporated into the training?

A24. The answer to the question can be found within the solicitation. Please see PWS Part 1.19.

Q25. Are background checks or security clearances required for contractor personnel accessing facilities or delivering FCC sessions?

A25. The answer to the question can be found within the solicitation. Please see PWS Part 1.6.1 Installation Access and PWS Part 1.6.3 Background Checks.

Q26. What metrics will the government use to evaluate the success of the training programs?

A26. Please see PWS, Part 1, 1.5.2 Quality Assurance.

Q27. Are there specific templates or formats required for post-training evaluations, attendance data, and course completion reports?

A27. Please see PWS, Part 5, Specific Tasks, Task 2 – Facility Coordinator Course, Subtask 2.1 Training Material.

Q28. Will After-Action Reviews (AARs) be required, and if so, what format and timeline should be followed for submission?

A28. The answer to the question can be found within the solicitation. Please see PWS Part 5.4 TASK 4 Training After Action Meetings for timeline to be followed. AARs shall be submitted in a PDF format.

Q29. Is there a budget ceiling or government cost estimate for this effort to guide the development of cost proposals?

A29. This information is proprietary to the government and will not be provided to potential offerors.

Q30. Will additional funding be available for comprehensive course development, such as multimedia content creation or expanded task analysis?

A30. The answer to the question can be found within the solicitation. The SCC course development and material creation will be included in the one-time cost of CLIN 0006 of the award.

Q31. After the formal question submission deadline (January 3, 2025), will there be opportunities for follow-up clarifications during the proposal evaluation period?

A31. There will be no addition question periods following the initial 3 January 2025 question deadline. All question received prior to the deadline will be addressed via a Solicitation Amendment posted to SAM.gov.

Q32. Is there a preferred format or process for submitting additional inquiries or updates as the solicitation progresses?

A32. Additional inquiries will not permitted at this time, after the initial question period has closed.

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .