W911SA24Q3078 SN KS032 Multi Site Performance Checklist.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Snow Removal Services at KS032 - Topeka, Kansas
- Solicitation number
- W911SA-24-Q-3078
About this file
This document contains a contractor performance inspection checklist and summary report for snow removal services at multiple Army Reserve facilities locations in Kansas. The inspection checklist evaluates contractor adherence to 30 performance standards across 8 categories of snow removal tasks, including plowing, salting, and cleanup. Performance is rated as satisfactory or unsatisfactory at each location for each standard, with an overall compliance rate of 100% found for all contractors and locations based on a periodic inspection conducted between October-September.
The related federal contract opportunity notice is for snow removal services at one Army Reserve facility location in Topeka, Kansas, with a performance period from March 2024 to October 2024 and four 12-month option periods. Quotes are due by the date and time listed on the solicitation to be issued on February 20, 2024 via SAM.gov. The contractor must provide all required documents including a signed SF1449 and price schedule with their quote submission. Written questions about the solicitation are due by February 23, 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 - Price Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 - Drawing.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Sample Service Ticket.docx | DOCX document | |
| W911SA24Q3078 SN KS032 Types (8).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 - AT OPSEC.pdf | ||
| W911SA24Q3078 SN KS032 Solicitation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FACID CHECKLIST
| CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST & SUMMARY REPORT V 1.5 | Method of Surveillance: Periodic Surveillance |
| Service Provided: Snow Removal Services | |
| Contractor Name: | |
| Contract Number: Contractor email: | |
| FAC ID: | |
| Building Number(s): | |
| Contracting Officer Representative: | Meeting Contract Requirements |
| Designated Representative: | |
| Contracting Officer: | |
| Contract Specialist: |
| Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | Fac ID: XX000 | ||||||||||
| PWS PART 1 General, Yes, No, or n/a | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| 1 | PWS # 1.6.6.1 ID OF EMPLOYEE'S: Are contractor personnel wearing ID badges in a conspicuous place on the front exterior clothing above the waist and are the contractor personnel wearing the ID badges on the employee list provided by the contractor? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Snow Removal, 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 2 | PWS 5.1 GENERAL: Did snow plowing operations begin within two (2) hours after notification from the COR or Designated Representative or as otherwise coordinated? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 1 Snow Removal, 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 3 | PWS 5.2 TYPE 1: Was the snow and ice plowed and cleared from roads, sidewalks, parking lots and Military Equipment Park (MEP) lot(s) down to the bare surface as indicated on the drawings? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 4 | PWS 5.2 TYPE 1: Were the dumpsters cleared of snow so they may be serviced? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 5 | PWS 5.2 TYPE 1: Were all fire hydrants kept free of snow with a minimum 5 foot diameter and a clear pathway free of ice and snow to the hydrant? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 6 | PWS 5.2 TYPE 1: Did the Contractor treat plowed and cleaned surfaces skid free by applying a contractor furnished sand, salt or approved chemical? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 7 | PWS 5.2 TYPE 1: Did the Contractor keep sidewalks in a slip free condition? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 2 Snow Removal, 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 8 | PWS 5.3 TYPE 2: Was the snow and ice plowed and cleared from roads, sidewalks, and parking lots down to the bare surface as indicated on the drawings? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 9 | PWS 5.3 TYPE 2: Were the dumpsters cleared of snow so they may be serviced? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 10 | PWS 5.3 TYPE 2: Were all fire hydrants kept free of snow with a minimum 5 foot diameter and a clear pathway free of ice and snow to the hydrant? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 11 | PWS 5.3 TYPE 2: Did the Contractor treat plowed and cleaned surfaces skid free by applying a contractor furnished sand, salt or approved chemical? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 12 | PWS 5.3 TYPE 2: Did the Contractor keep sidewalks in a slip free condition? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 3 Snow Removal (MEP Lots), 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 13 | PWS 5.4 TYPE 3: Was the snow and ice plowed and cleared from roads, sidewalks, and parking lots down to the bare surface as indicated on the drawings? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 14 | PWS 5.4 TYPE 3: Were the parked military vehicles cleared of snow so as to be accessable? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 15 | PWS 5.4 TYPE 3: Were all fire hydrants kept free of snow with a minimum 5 foot diameter and a clear pathway free of ice and snow to the hydrant? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 4 Snow Removal (Sidewalks), 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 16 | PWS 5.5 TYPE 4: Was the snow and ice plowed and cleared from sidewalks down to the bare surface as indicated on the drawings? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 17 | PWS 5.5 TYPE 4: Were all fire hydrants kept free of snow with a minimum 5 foot diameter and a clear pathway free of ice and snow to the hydrant? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 18 | PWS 5.5 TYPE 4: Did the Contractor treat surfaces skid free by applying a contractor furnished sand, salt or approved chemical? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 19 | PWS 5.5 TYPE 4: Did the Contractor keep sidewalks in a slip free condition? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 5 Salting and Sanding, 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 20 | PWS 5.6 TYPE 5: Were all fire hydrants kept free of snow with a minimum 5 foot diameter and a clear pathway free of ice and snow to the hydrant? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 21 | PWS 5.6 TYPE 5: Did the Contractor treat plowed and cleaned surfaces skid free by applying a contractor furnished sand, salt or approved chemical? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 22 | PWS 5.6 TYPE 5: Did the Contractor keep sidewalks in a slip free condition? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 6 Snow Removal (Hauling), 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 23 | PWS 5.7 TYPE 6: Was the snow moved from the designated areas to dumping sites as directed by the COR or as shown on the attached drawings? | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 5 Specific Tasks: Type 8 Snow Removal (Cleanup), 1, 0, n/a, n/o | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | SAT | UNSAT | |
| 24 | PWS 5.9 TYPE 8: Did the Contractor provide adequate End of Season Cleanup that was ordered within 15 business days of being notified? | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| PWS PART 7 Deliverables, Yes, No, or n/a | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| 25 | PWS 1.6.14. Key Personnel: Did the contractor provide contact information of the designated and alternate POC 5 days after contract award and update this contact information as changes occur? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 26 | PWS 1.7.1. AT Level 1 Training: Did Contractor provide the COR certificates verifying all employees completed AT Level 1 Training within 30 days of the contract start date or new hire start date? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 27 | PWS 1.7.5. iWATCH Training: Was this training to be completed within 30 calendar days of Notice to Proceed and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the Contracting Officer no later than 60 calendar days after Notice to Proceed? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 28 | PWS 5.10. Did the Contractor submit a service ticket NLT at end of the month after the service occurred? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 29 | PWS 5.11. Did the contractor invoice in the appropriate invoicing system? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| 30 | PWS 5.12. Did the Contractor provide required annual CMRA data NLT 31 October? | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| COMMENTS: | |||||||||||||||||
| Total: | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | |
| 100.00% Found Acceptable | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||||||||
| 0.0% - 99.99% Found Unacceptable | |||||||||||||||||
| All tasks have been inspected in accordance with this checklist per method of surveillance | Cumulative percentage: | 100.00% | |||||||||||||||
| Summary Report (Required): | |||||||||||||||||
| Designated Representative name and date of inspection: | |||||||||||||||||
| NAME: DATE: | |||||||||||||||||
| COR Name and date of reviewed and accepted inspection results: | |||||||||||||||||
| NAME: DATE: |
W911SAXXXXXXX LOG
| W911SAXXXXXXX Performance FYXX | ||||||||||||||
| # | Month | Contract Number | Contractor Name | Contracting Office | Customer | Contract Value | Type Contract | KO Name | COR Supervisor Name | COR Name | Total PRS Factors | Compliant PRS Factors | Noncompliant PRS Factors | Compliant Rate |
| 1 | October | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 2 | November | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 3 | December | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 4 | January | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 5 | February | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 6 | March | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 7 | April | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 8 | May | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 9 | June | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 10 | July | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 11 | August | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| 12 | September | McCoy | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| Totals | 0 | 0 | 0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
W911SAXXXXXXX Performance FYXX W911SAXXXXXXX Performance FYXX October November December January February March April May June July August September 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W911SAXXXXXXX Performance
| Contractor Performance Inspection Checklist | FYXX | TOTALS | |||||||||||
| Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep |
| PERFORMANCE STANDARD | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | SAT | USAT |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOTALS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
USAT Factors
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W911SAXXXXXXX Compliance Rates
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .