W911S8-17-R-0002_Pavement_Markings_Solicitation.pdf

The resulting contract w ill be an INDEFINITE DELIVERY / INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) Contract for construction.

A. This acquisition is restricted to Woman Ow ned Small Business concerns.

B. The assigned NAICS Code is 237310, "Highw ay, Street, and Bridge Construction” w ith a small business size standard of $36.5M.

C. The IDIQ is to be based on a general Statement of Work (SOW) further defined in individual Task Orders.

D. The estimated program value for all task orders to be placed over the f ive (5) year ordering period of the resulting contract w ill be $9,000,000.00. How ever, if the Government's requirements do not meet the program amount, it shall not constitute the basis for an equitable adjustment under this contract.

E. The minimum dollar value of each task order is $2,000.00.

F. The maximum dollar value of each task order is $750,000.00 G. Bonding w ill be determined at the task order level..

H. Blocks 11, 12, and 13B on this SF Form 1442 (and the resulting contract) apply to individual Task Orders.

SCOTT BYRD (253) 477-5435

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

09-Feb-2017

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______ calendar days and complete it w ithin ________ calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________FAR 52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________2 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________10 Mar 2017 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

MICC- JB LEWIS-MC CHORD

BUILDING 2015

JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD WA 98433-9500

W911S8

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: (253) 966-3505 TEL: FAX:

W911S8-17-R-0002 45

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Each JBLM Base Year

FFP

Pavement marking and rubber removal performed at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) as described in each task order. Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List, will be used as the unit price guide and the appropriate coefficient multiplier will be used to determine individual task order pricing.

Base Period: 1 April 2017 - 31 March 2018 FOB: Destination

NET AMT

0002 1 Each YTC Base Year

FFP

Pavement marking and rubber removal performed at Yakima Training Center (YTC). Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List, will be used as the unit price guide and the appropriate coefficient multiplier will be used to determine individual task order pricing.

Base Period: 1 April 2017 - 31 March 2018

1001 1 Each OPTION JBLM Option Year 1

FFP

Pavement marking and rubber removal performed at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) as described in each task order. Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List, will be used as the unit price guide and the appropriate coefficient multiplier will be used to determine individual task order pricing.

Base Period: 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019

1002 1 Each OPTION YTC Option Year 1

FFP

Pavement marking and rubber removal performed at Yakima Training Center (YTC). Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List, will be used as the unit price guide and the appropriate coefficient multiplier will be used to determine individual task order pricing.

Base Period: 1 April 2018 - 31 March 2019

2001 1 Each OPTION JBLM Option Year 2

FFP

Pavement marking and rubber removal performed at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) as described in each task order. Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List, will be used as the unit price guide and the appropriate coefficient multiplier will be used to determine individual task order pricing.

Base Period: 1 April 2019 - 31 March 2020

2002 1 Each OPTION YTC Option Year 2

FFP

Pavement marking and rubber removal performed at Yakima Training Center (YTC). Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List, will be used as the unit price guide and the appropriate coefficient multiplier will be used to determine individual task order pricing.

Base Period: 1 April 2019 - 31 March 2020

3001 1 Each OPTION JBLM Option Year 3

FFP

Pavement marking and rubber removal performed at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) as described in each task order. Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List, will be used as the unit price guide and the appropriate coefficient multiplier will be used to determine individual task order pricing.

Base Period: 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2021

3002 1 Each OPTION YTC Option Year 3

FFP

Pavement marking and rubber removal performed at Yakima Training Center (YTC). Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List, will be used as the unit price guide and the appropriate coefficient multiplier will be used to determine individual task order pricing.

Base Period: 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2021

4001 1 Each OPTION JBLM Option Year 4

FFP

Pavement marking and rubber removal performed at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) as described in each task order. Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List, will be used as the unit price guide and the appropriate coefficient multiplier will be used to determine individual task order pricing.

Base Period: 1 April 2021 - 31 March 2022

4002 1 Each OPTION YTC Option Year 4

FFP

Pavement marking and rubber removal performed at Yakima Training Center (YTC). Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List, will be used as the unit price guide and the appropriate coefficient multiplier will be used to determine individual task order pricing.

Base Period: 1 April 2021 - 31 March 2022

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC

0001 POP 01-APR-2017 TO

31-MAR-2018

N/A JBLM PUBLIC WORKS IMLM-PW MS17

JBLM PUBLIC WORKS IMLM-PW MS17

BOX 339500

JBLM, WA 98433-9500

W68NE6

0002 POP 01-APR-2017 TO

31-MAR-2018

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1001 POP 01-APR-2018 TO

31-MAR-2019

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1002 POP 01-APR-2018 TO

31-MAR-2019

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2001 POP 01-APR-2019 TO

31-MAR-2020

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2002 POP 01-APR-2019 TO

31-MAR-2020

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3001 POP 01-APR-2020 TO

31-MAR-2021

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3002 POP 01-APR-2020 TO

31-MAR-2021

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4001 POP 01-APR-2021 TO

31-MAR-2022

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4002 POP 01-APR-2021 TO

31-MAR-2022

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

SCHEDULE OF COEFFICIENTS

SCHEDULE OF PROPOSED COEFFICIENTS

Provide all plant, labor, logistics, tools, equipment and materials necessary to perform all work as required for Painting Roadway, Parking Lot and Airfield Markings in accordance with the attached specifications for Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) and the Yakima Training Center (YTC) calculated by multiplying the following coefficients by items in Technical Exhibit 1, Work Item Price List. Contractor’s coefficient will be adjusted for option periods in accordance with Section 01 11 00.

In the spaces below provide the coefficient to be utilized for awarding Task Orders:

ITEM DESCRIPTION CONTRACTOR’S

NO. COEFFICIENT

Base Period 0001 All work on JBLM ________________

0002 All work on YTC ________________

Section 00 21 13 - Instructions to Bidders

SECTION L AND M

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

A. Proposal Submittal and Inquiries.

1. Proposals shall be submitted by email to Scott Byrd, Contract Specialist (CS), scott.a.byrd.civ@mail.mil and Ralph Chavez, Contracting Officer (KO), ralph.c.chavez.civ@mail.mil prior to the closing date and time identified in the solicitation (10 March 2017, 2:00 P.M.,PST). No other means of submission is allowed.

Offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) under NAICS code 237310 (Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction) in order to be considered for award.

Any proposal, modification, or revision, received after the exact time specified for receipt of submission is “late” and will not be considered. Late proposals will be processed under a late proposals rule as indicated in the FAR 52.212-1(f).

2. The KO and CS are the sole points of contact for this acquisition. Address all written questions or concerns you may have to the KO and CS. Please identify the applicable Statement of Work (SOW) paragraph number or solicitation reference with each question. All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing via email to the POCs identified below.

The deadline for submission of questions is 3:00 PM, PST, 17 February 2017.

Scott Byrd (CS), scott.a.byrd.civ@mail.mil

Ralph Chavez (KO), ralph.c.chavez.civ@mail.mil

3. Site Visit. The Government will not be conducting a site visit due to the nature of the entitled requirement. However, if industry dictates that a site visit is needed to adequately assess the requirement at hand, then proposers have 5 calendar days from solicitation release on FBO to request a site visit be conducted. If a site visit is to be conducted, all questions incorporated from the site visit are to be submitted in writing no later than one business day following the site visit. Answers and clarification of contract requirements will be incorporated into an amendment to the solicitation and posted to FBO for viewing by all potential offerors. Industry questions and answers may or may not have a bearing on the substantive content of the solicitation or the contract requirements, and it should not be assumed that the date set for receipt of proposals will be extended.

B. General Instructions

1. The basis of award for this requirement is Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable.

Offers will be evaluated using the criteria under Addendum to FAR Clause 52.215-1, Instruction to Offerors. Noncompliance with the RFP requirements will raise serious questions regarding an offeror’s technical ability to perform the contracted services and may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from further consideration for contract award.

W911S8-17-R-0002

2. The Offer - The submission of the documentation specified below will constitute the offeror's acceptance of the terms and conditions of the RFP, concurrence with the Statement of Work (SOW), and contract type.

3. It is the Government’s intention to award without discussions. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission. However, in accordance with (IAW) FAR 15.306 (Exchanges with Offerors After Receipt of Proposals), should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them.

4. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

5. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise deemed unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the KO in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

C. Proposal Preparation Instructions

1. Offeror’s proposal shall consist of three volumes as shown in paragraph 2 below.

2. Proposal Format

The proposals shall be organized into three volumes: Volume I, Contract/Price;

Volume II, Quality/Technical Capability; and Volume III, Past Performance. A cover sheet should also be provided at the beginning of each volume and clearly marked as to volume number, title, solicitation identification and the offeror’s name. All text shall be single spaced and printed black on white paper (Black and white requirement does not apply to graphics, photos, Company stationary and logos are acceptable). Printing shall be easily readable (12-pitch type or 10 point proportional spacing). Cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections. Page limitations are as follows:

VOLUME TITLE NO. OF COPIES PAGE LIMITS

I Technical Capability

- Management

- Experience

Original + 1 electronic copy

Total 20 pages (Management – 10 Pages; Experience – 10 pages)

II Past Performance Original + 1 electronic copy

No Limit

III Contract/TE1/Price Original + 1 electronic copy

No Limit

3. Proposal Content

a) Volume I - Technical Capability - (Limited to no more than 20 pages total.)

(1) The Technical Capability Volumes shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important.

Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory.

By your proposal submission, you are representing that your firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation. It is not necessary or desirable for you to tell us so in your quote.

Technical Capability factor. The contractor must have a minimum of 6 years’ experience in related industry. Each offeror shall provide documented evidence that demonstrates it meets the required experience. Provide an overview of the organization's management experience in providing pavement marking and rubber removal services similar to those contained in the SOW.

Provide a list of the contracts that your firm has/had with customers for the past 6 years and associated dollar amounts ($1M minimum). The list shall contain your customer’s organization name, address, POC, telephone number and email address for each contract.

(1a) SUBFACTOR A: MANAGEMENT APPROACH

For this subfactor, the Offeror shall submit a management approach for successful execution of the contract. The management approach shall include, at a minimum, the following:

1. Offerors shall provide a detailed narrative on its management approach. The Offeror shall include discussions on the home office and on-site management, to include on-site management’s interaction with its home office, as well as any other management aspects specific to the solicited work such as roles and responsibilities of dedicated management staff assigned (Project Manager, Superintendent, etc.).

2. The Offer shall demonstrate its ability to be responsive to the requirement of the contract.

Offeror shall explain how it will respond to task order Requests for Proposals, warranty work, and Daily Report as well proposal preparation, subcontract management, surveillance of work, acceptance, rejection, documentation, and resolution of deficiencies, trend analysis and shall include corrective actions, and interface with Government inspectors and engineers at each stage of construction. Offeror shall identify those individuals responsible for those actions. The Offerer shall explain and demonstrate its ability to respond to warranty work within a two hour time limit, its ability to respond to a task order RFP site visit within 24 hours with an indication as to who would attend, and its ability to prepare and submit a task order RFP within 3 days with an explanation as to how they would accomplish the RFP requirements.

3. The Offeror shall provide a Staffing Plan that addresses the organizational structure of the Offeror's proposed team, including key personnel, “in house” workforce, major subcontractors, teaming partners, joint ventures, quality control personnel, for this project. The staffing plan shall be outlined through a narrative and a diagrammed organizational chart. The staffing plan for the on-site staff shall include the identification of proposed key personnel positions with regards to this contract. The offeror’s narrative shall provide the proposed job title, specific duties, responsibilities, experience, education, and qualifications for each key personnel position. The Offeror shall detail the levels of authority granted to each of the key personnel at the site office.

The Offeror shall explain and demonstrate its ability to provide a Project Manager with at least five years of demonstrated experience with the type of work found in this requirement. This includes experience with the disciplines and managing multiple projects concurrently found in this requirement.

(1b) SUBFACTOR B: EXPERIENCE

1. The Government requires a contractor capable of performing a variety of the different work expected under this contract. The Contractor must be capable of handling multiple projects simultaneously that are comparable in magnitude of construction of what is expected under this contract. The purpose is to demonstrate the Offeror’s experience completing multiple projects with concurrent periods of performance utilizing multiple construction disciplines.

2. The Offeror, or offering entity in the case of a joint venture, shall provide evidence of no more than five (5) relevant contracts, projects, or task orders completed within the past six years from the date this RFP was issued. If more than five (5) projects are submitted only the first five (5) projects will be evaluated. Projects should demonstrate ability to perform or manage multiple construction disciplines and the ability to manage concurrent periods of performance. Provide evidence of a minimum of two instances where a minimum of two or more projects were performed with overlapping periods of performance.

3. Experience shall be performed as a prime contractor, subcontractor, or as the offering entity. If the offering entity does not have the requisite experience, then submit experience as a prime contractor for each individual partner.

4. For each project, submit the following information:

Project Title & Location State whether work was performed as the Prime or subcontractor Dollar Value of Work and Percentage of Overall Project your firm was responsible for

(include your firm’s work and your subcontractor’s work) Start & Completion Dates (Month/Year) Brief Description of Project and its relevancy to work that may be ordered under any resulting contract Customer Point of Contact (i.e., name, relationship to project, agency/firm, city, state, current phone no., and email address) Percentage of project self-performed, dollar value, and specific types of work self-performed.

Percentage, dollar value, and specific types of trades performed by your subcontractors.

5. Projects provided for experience should show the Offeror’s ability to manage/perform multiple projects performed simultaneously, and in the following categories of work:

6. The similarity of the scope, magnitude, and complexity of Offeror’s previous experience to the scope and complexity of the requirements for this contract;

7. The Offeror’s experience in performing/managing multiple projects being executed either simultaneously or on an overlapping basis;

8. The Offeror’s experience in performing multiple disciplines simultaneously and separately

b) Volume II - Past Performance - (Limited to no more than 5 contracts. Limited to no more than 2 pages per contract listed). Must have consent letters for subcontractors or client authorization letters for commercial customers authorizing release of information.

(1) The Past Performance rating will focus on whether the offerors receive overall acceptable performance ratings from offerors’ customers. The documentation shall include the name and address of the organization receiving services, Administrative Contracting Officer, Government or commercial technical representative or COR, period of performance, telephone number, email address (if known), the point of contact and dollar value for services. The information provided in the proposal is subject for verification with the receiver of said services.

The submittal shall include rationale on how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Non-Government contracts may be used if Government contracts are not available.

(2) Offerors must not have a “Termination for Cause or Default” on any

Government contract termination or on any private sector contract for unsatisfactory performance within the last six years. Offerors shall obtain documentation for past performance ratings from their customers. The Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 1) shall be returned directly to the Contract Specialist and KO. Any questionnaires not returned directly to the Contract Specialist and KO will not be reviewed and evaluated. The information contained in the questionnaires will be used to evaluate the offerors’ past performance.

(3) Past Performance Questionnaires must be submitted by the references via e-mail to scott.a.byrd.civ@mail.mil and ralph.c.chavez.civ@mail.mil. Past Performance Questionnaires received directly from the offerors will not be accepted.

(4) Evaluation of past performance will often be subjective based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances. It will include a determination of the offerors’ commitment to customer satisfaction and will include conclusions of informed judgment.

(5) The burden of providing valid past performance information rests with the

Offerors. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to verify the email addresses and telephone numbers of references when requesting past performance information from them. If the Government is unable to reach the POC from the information provided, past performance will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably. The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information from sources other than those provided by the offerors.

(6) In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offerors’ Past Performance Volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to: the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) or similar systems, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and commercial sources.

c) Volume III - Contract/Price. Offerors are required to submit a completed SF 1442 (Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items) including acknowledgement of Amendments, the Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule, and the applicable Fill-in Provisions/Clauses. Failure to follow the below Contract Proposal preparation instructions may cause your proposal to be deemed unacceptable by the Government. This volume shall be organized as follows and contain the identified information:

(1) SF 1442 - The SF 1442 shall be submitted fully completed. The contractor shall acknowledge any amendments to the RFP in accordance with the instructions on the SF1442 and with the addendum to FAR Provision 52.215-1. The offeror shall provide the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.

(2) Pricing Instruction – The completed Technical Exhibit 1 shall be returned with your proposal. Failure to provide a completed Technical Exhibit 1 with the proposal may result in rejection of your proposal. The offeror is not required to submit cost or pricing data.

However, the Contracting Officer may require the offeror to submit information other than cost or pricing data after receipt of its proposal to support its proposed price in accordance with FAR 15.403-3. The specific nature, and detail, of this information will be specified at the time it is requested.

(3) Fill-in Provisions/Clauses - The offeror shall provide all information and all fill-ins required in the below clause and provisions:

52.209-7 -- Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (Jul 2013)

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. Basis for Contract Award

a. This is a best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS). Award will be made to a single offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements, and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, represents the Lowest Priced offer with an Acceptable or neutral past performance evaluation rating.

b. Trade-offs between cost/price and non-cost/price factors are not permitted. Unreasonably high, unbalanced, inaccurate or incomplete price proposals, may be the grounds for eliminating a proposal from the competition. The Government will evaluate proposed prices for reasonableness using price analysis techniques. Proposed prices evaluated as unreasonable may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from the competition.

c. Award for All of the Work. The Government intends to award one (1) contract as a result of this solicitation. Offers received for less than the stated number of items listed in the Schedule of Proposed Coefficients (Section B-Supplies or Services and Prices of this solicitation) will be considered ineligible for award. As set forth in FAR 52.215-1 (f)(4), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a), Clarifications and award without discussions). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In the event that discussions are held, a competitive range determination will be made. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2. Evaluation Criteria

a. Evaluation criteria consist of factors. The proposals will be evaluated under three (3) evaluation factors:

Factor 1: Technical

Subfactor A - Management Approach Subfactor B - Experience

Factor 2: Past Performance Factor 3: Price

b. FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL

The Government’s technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each subfactor. Any subfactor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire Technical proposal “Unacceptable” and, therefore, in eligible for award. The Government will consider for award only those proposals determined to be technically “Acceptable”.

TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum standards and requirements of the technical factors and subfactors as stipulated within the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum standards and requirements of ALL the technical factors and subfactors within the solicitation.

b.1 SUBFACTOR A – MANAGEMENT APPROACH

The Offeror must demonstrate the ability to manage multiple work efforts of relevant size and complexity at multiple sites often with different subcontractors. The Offeror’s proposal must demonstrate management processes addressing selecting subcontractors, awarding contracts, subcontract administration, management, and performance of services, scheduling, and correction of defects prior to, and after Government review. Proposal must address Offeror’s plan to provide a Program Manager and Project Managers for each TO.

SUBFACTOR A – MANAGEMENT APPROACH

Acceptable

1. Proposal clearly demonstrated the Offeror’s ability to structure its organization to allow for successful performance and demonstrates that the Offeror has the requisite qualifications and experience to perform under the contract and on future task orders.

2. Proposal clearly demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to successfully respond to Requests for Proposals (RFP), warranty work, and Daily Report as well proposal preparation, subcontract management, surveillance of work, acceptance, rejection, documentation, and resolution of deficiencies, trend analysis and shall include corrective actions, and interface with Government inspectors and engineers at each stage of construction.

3. Proposal clearly demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to respond to warranty work within the Governments two hour time limit of notifying the contractor of this issue.

4. Proposal clearly demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to respond to a task order site visit within 24 hours and task order RFP issuance.

5. Proposal clearly demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to submit a proposal within 3 days of task order RFP issuance.

6. Proposal clearly demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to staff, manage and maintain an “in house” workforce, recruit and retain a qualified, licensed, certified, and trained workforce throughout the duration of the contract.

7. Proposal clearly demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to manage and maintain a comprehensive subcontractor base and ensure timely compensation for subcontractor services.

8. Proposal clearly demonstrated the Offeror’s ability to provide a Project Manager with at least five years of demonstrated experience with the type of work found in this requirement to include experience managing the disciplines and multiple projects simultaneously.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly demonstrate all items (1-8) in above Acceptable criteria.

b.2 SUBFACTOR B – EXPERIENCE

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s experience on an acceptable/unacceptable basis and assign one of the ratings described below based on the criteria listed.

SUBFACTOR B – EXPERIENCE RATINGS

Proposal clearly demonstrates the Offeror has experience in completing multiple projects simultaneously utilizing a variety of construction disciplines that are comparable in magnitude of construction to those projects expected under this contract.

Unacceptable

Proposal does not clearly demonstrates the Offeror has experience in completing multiple projects simultaneously utilizing a variety of construction disciplines that are comparable in magnitude of construction to those projects expected under this contract.

c. Factor 2 - Past Performance. The Past Performance evaluation will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation’s requirements as indicated by that offeror’s record of past performance. Past Performance is assessed at the factor level after evaluating aspects of the offeror’s recent past performance and focusing on performance that is relevant to the services being procured under this solicitation. Offerors are cautioned that in conducting the performance risk assessment, the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources, such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) or similar systems and State Department Watch Lists. Past performance areas of evaluation include:

- Business Relations

- Quality of Service

- Schedule

- Cost Control

- Customer Satisfaction

(1) Each offeror will receive a performance confidence assessment rating based on the Offeror’s recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the Contract requirements.

(2) Recency Assessment. An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past 6 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

(3) Relevancy Assessment. To be relevant, the effort must be similar in nature of work, size, and complexity. The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine if it is the same or similar in nature of work, size, and complexity to the services/products being procured under this solicitation. A relevancy determination of the offeror’s (including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s)) past performance will be made. In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration should be given to what aspects of an offeror’s contract history would give the most confidence that the offeror will satisfy the current procurement. The past performance information provided in the proposal and obtained from other sources will be used to establish the relevancy of past performance.

(4) The Past Performance Evaluation Team will review this past performance information and determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to the performance confidence assessment.

(5) Assigning Ratings. The Past Performance Factor will be assigned one of the ratings defined below.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

Rating Definition

Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable

Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(6) Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

d. Factor 3 – Price. Price will not be scored or rated. Evaluation of price will be performed using one or more of the price analysis techniques in FAR 15.404-1(b). Through these techniques the Government will determine whether prices are reasonable, complete and balanced.

(1) Options. Since the option year coefficient is determined by a preset formula, offerors are not required to propose a coefficient for the option years. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(2) The Government will calculate and evaluate each offeror’s Base Year Total Evaluated Price (BYTEP) for award purposes as shown in paragraph (3) below. Since option year coefficients are determined by a preset formula, all offerors’ coefficients would increase or decrease by the same amount from one option period to the next. Thus, the evaluation of the BYTEP (determined as a function of the proposed base year coefficient) results in the same outcome as evaluating the total price consisting of the base year, all the option years, and the ½ of the fourth option period since each option year price would equal the base year price. Therefore, evaluating the BYTEP satisfies the requirement to evaluate all of the option periods and the Government’s evaluation of its option to extend services. (FAR clause 52.217-8.).

(3) The BYTEP will be calculated as follows:

BYTEP = BYP JBLM + BYP YTC

Where:

BYTEP = Base Year Total Evaluated Price BYP JBLM = Base Year Price JBLM BYP YTC = Base Year Price YTC BYP JBLM is calculated as follows:

Multiply the prices of Line Items 1-39 in Technical Exhibit #1, Work Price List (Section J, List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments) by the quantities as listed in Section L, Table 3 Estimated Base Year Quantities Line Items 1 – 39, Column Estimated Quantities JBLM

Add the extended totals for Line Items 1 – 39

Multiply the total by the proposed coefficient for JBLM

BYP YTC is calculated as follows:

Multiply the prices of Line Items 1-39 in Technical Exhibit #1, Work Price List (Section J, List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments) by the quantities as listed in Section L, Table 3 Estimated Base Year Quantities Line Items 1 – 39, Column Estimated Quantities YTC

Add the extended totals for Line Items 1 – 39 Multiply the total by the proposed coefficient for YTC

(4) The BYTEP is to evaluate offers for award purposes and shall not obligate the Government to place orders totaling this amount.

(5) Unbalanced Pricing may be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g), as applicable, to assess potential performance risk which could result in unreasonably high prices.

Definitions.

Reasonableness. A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business.

Completeness/Accuracy. The offeror’s proposal is in compliance with the Price

Volume instructions in the solicitation.

CONTRACTOR LINE ITEM TOTALS

Contractor shall fill in the total of the contract line items for Technical Exhibit 1 for each individual period, as appropriate.

Base year

1st Option Period

1 Apr 2017

1 Apr 2018

– 31 Mar 2018

– 31 Mar 2019

2nd Option Period 3rd Option Period 4th Option Period

1 Apr 2019

1 Apr 2020

1 Apr 2021

– 31 Mar 2020

– 31 Mar 2021

– 31 Mar 2022

GRAND TOTAL $

Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-3 Taxpayer Identification OCT 1998

Section 00 61 00 - Bond Forms

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.228-15 PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS--CONSTRUCTION (OCT 2010)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

Original contract price means the award price of the contract; or, for requirements contracts, the price payable for the estimated total quantity; or, for indefinite-quantity contracts, the price payable for the specified minimum quantity. Original contract price does not include the price of any options, except those options exercised at the time of contract award.

(b) Amount of required bonds. Unless the resulting contract price is $150,000 or less, the successful offeror shall furnish performance and payment bonds to the Contracting Officer as follows:

(1) Performance bonds (Standard Form 25). The penal amount of performance bonds at the time of contract award shall be 100 percent of the original contract price.

(2) Payment Bonds (Standard Form 25-A). The penal amount of payment bonds at the time of contract award shall be 100 percent of the original contract price.

(3) Additional bond protection. (i) The Government may require additional performance and payment bond protection if the contract price is increased. The increase in protection generally will equal 100 percent of the increase in contract price.

(ii) The Government may secure the additional protection by directing the Contractor to increase the penal amount of the existing bond or to obtain an additional bond.

(c) Furnishing executed bonds. The Contractor shall furnish all executed bonds, including any necessary reinsurance agreements, to the Contracting Officer, within the time period specified in the Bid Guarantee provision of the solicitation, or otherwise specified by the Contracting Officer, but in any event, before starting work.

(d) Surety or other security for bonds. The bonds shall be in the form of firm commitment, supported by corporate sureties whose names appear on the list contained in Treasury Department Circular 570, individual sureties, or by other acceptable security such as postal money order, certified check, cashier's check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, in accordance with Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States. Treasury Circular 570 is published in the Federal Register or may be obtained from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782. Or via the internet at http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/.

(e) Notice of subcontractor waiver of protection (40 U.S.C. 3133(c)). Any waiver of the right to sue on the payment bond is void unless it is in writing, signed by the person whose right is waived, and executed after such person has first furnished labor or material for use in the performance of the contract.

(End of clause)

Section 00 70 00 - Conditions of the Contract

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

$2,500.00 $9,000,000.00

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

$2,500.00 $750,000.00

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

CLIN

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A N/A Government 0002 N/A N/A N/A Government 1001 N/A N/A N/A Government 1002 N/A N/A N/A Government 2001 N/A N/A N/A Government 2002 N/A N/A N/A Government 3001 N/A N/A N/A Government 3002 N/A N/A N/A Government 4001 N/A N/A N/A Government 4002 N/A N/A N/A Government

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees MAY 2014 52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government SEP 2006 52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures MAY 2014 52.203-8 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or

Improper Activity

MAY 2014

52.203-10 Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity MAY 2014 52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal

Transactions

OCT 2010

52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

APR 2014

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2016

52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards

OCT 2016

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

OCT 2015

52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters

JUL 2013

52.209-11 Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under and Federal Law

FEB 2016

52.211-13 Time Extensions SEP 2000 52.215-2 Audit and Records--Negotiation OCT 2010 52.215-13 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data--Modifications OCT 2010 52.215-14 Integrity of Unit Prices OCT 2010 52.215-21 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data

Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data -- Modifications

OCT 2010

52.215-23 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges OCT 2009 52.216-22 Indefinite Quantity OCT 1995 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns NOV 2016 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting JAN 2017 52.219-28 Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation JUL 2013 52.219-30 Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole Source Award to, Women-

Owned Small Business Concerns Eligible Under the Women- Owned Small Business Program

DEC 2015

52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003 52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities APR 2015 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity SEP 2016 52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans OCT 2015 52.222-36 Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities JUL 2014 52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans FEB 2016 52.222-40 Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor

Relations Act

DEC 2010

52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons MAR 2015 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification OCT 2015 52.223-4 Recovered Material Certification MAY 2008 52.223-6 Drug-Free Workplace MAY 2001 52.223-9 Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for

EPA-Designated Items

MAY 2008

52.223-16 Acquisition of EPEAT (R) - Registered Personal Computer Products

OCT 2015

52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While Driving

AUG 2011

52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008 52.227-1 Authorization and Consent DEC 2007 52.227-2 Notice And Assistance Regarding Patent And Copyright

Infringement

DEC 2007

52.229-3 Federal, State And Local Taxes FEB 2013 52.230-3 Disclosure And Consistency Of Cost Accounting Practices OCT 2015 52.232-9 Limitation On Withholding Of Payments APR 1984 52.232-23 Alt I Assignment of Claims (May 2014) - Alternate I APR 1984 52.232-25 Prompt Payment JAN 2017 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award

Management

JUL 2013

52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014 52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996

52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004 52.236-2 Differing Site Conditions APR 1984 52.236-3 Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work APR 1984 52.236-4 Physical Data APR 1984 52.236-5 Material and Workmanship APR 1984 52.236-6…