Sect_J_Attach_G_PP_QUES_FORM_19Apr2016.docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
TUAS Shadow RQ-7B Technical Services and Field Support
Solicitation number
W911QY-16-R-0009
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Form

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sect_J_Attach_H_Cost_Price_WB_14June2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Government_Responses_to_Additional_Industry_Questions_(14June2016).pdf PDF
SOLICITATION_AMENDMENT_W911QY-16-R-0009_(15June2016).pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_H_Cost_Price_WB_7June2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SOLICITATION_W911QY-16-R-0009_(7June2016).pdf PDF
Government_Responses_to_Industry_Questions_(7June2016).pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_N_Table1NotionalRQ-7BFieldingNETSchedule.pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_C_Tech_Svs_Labor_Cats_25MAY2016.pdf PDF
SOLICITATION_AMENDMENT_W911QY-16-R-0009_(7June2016).pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_G_PP_QUES_FORM_25MAY2016.docx DOCX document
Sect_J_Attach_L_Non_Disclosure_13May2016_REVISED.pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_L_Non_Disclosure_29Apr2016.pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_J_DSL_19Apr2016.pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_A_PWS_19Apr2016.pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_D_CDRLS_19Apr2016.pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_C_Labor_Cats_19Apr2016.pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_M_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_I_SEP_19Apr2016.pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_F_CSDR_ENG_SVCS_(2)_Procurement.xls XLS spreadsheet
Sect_J_Attach_H_Cost_Price_WB_2May2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Sect_J_Attach_E_Labor_Cat_19Apr2016.pdf PDF
Solicitation_W911QY-16-R-0009_TUAS_TSAFS.pdf PDF
Sect_J_Attach_F_CSDR_ENG_SVCS_(3)_OM.xls XLS spreadsheet
Sect_J_Attach_F_CSDR_ENG_SVCS_(1)_RDTE.xls XLS spreadsheet
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________

POC:________________________Title:________________________
(Name)(E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .