Attach_12-Technical_Evaluation_Plan.pdf

TECHNICAL EVALUATION PLAN

AAP# AN190039

Repair of 1790 Test Cells by Installation of DOC/DPF Opacity Reduction Systems

This project will be evaluated as described herein.

1. Technical Requirements.

1.1 The technical requirements portion of the offer will be rated by the government on a ‘met’ or ‘not met’ basis.

1.2 The technical requirements portion of the offer should discuss the offeror’s proposed solution to meet the requirements of the statement of work (SOW), including any technical and system performance literature, specification sheets, certifications, available test or performance data, narrative descriptions, historical information, analytical support, design documentation, or other such data as required to clearly support conformance of the proposed system solution to the requirements of the statement of work (SOW). BIDS THAT ONLY RESPOND IN THE AFFIRMATIVE (IE. WILL

COMPLY) WITH NO EXPLANATION OF HOW THE SOW REQUIREMENT WILL

BE MET WILL BE CONSIDERED NON-RESPONSIVE.

2. Past Performance.

2.1 The government will conduct a performance risk evaluation based upon the past performance of offerors and proposed major subcontractors as it relates to the probability of successfully performing the solicitation requirements.

2.2 The offeror shall submit with proposal the information listed below for RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE ON THREE (3) CONTRACTS performed within the past three (3) years prior to closing of this solicitation. For services, contractor shall have performed under each contract for a minimum of one (1) year within the past three

(3) years. Each contract cited may be ongoing or complete provided it meets the one year performance criteria. For equipment or supplies, contractor shall have completed each contract within the past three (3) years.

2.3 For each contract, provide:

a. A description of your contract or subcontract (government or commercial).

Government contracts are defined as those with the Federal government and agencies of state and local governments.

b. Name of contracting activity/commercial firm.

c. Contract Number.

d. Contract type (fixed price or cost reimbursable).

e. Total contract value.

f. Description of work/NSN, Part Number, Nomenclature.

g. Contracting officer/contract manager, telephone number, and email address.

h. Administrative contracting officer, if different from g. above, telephone number, and email address.

i. A brief summary of work performed under each contract cited.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION PLAN

AAP# AN190039

Repair of 1790 Test Cells by Installation of DOC/DPF Opacity Reduction Systems

j. Explanation of why contract or subcontract is considered relevant to proposed acquisition. If only a portion of cited contract is relevant, include in your explanation.

k. Information on problems encountered on the contract and actions taken to correct problems identified.

2.4 If offeror proposes use of major subcontractor(s) in performance of resultant contract, provide a description of the work to be performed (supplies or services) by each major subcontractor and the information specified above for each subcontractor identified as relevant to the work to be performed by the subcontractor. A significant or major subcontractor is that subcontractor expected to provide over 20 percent of the work effort or critical hardware, software, or services.

3. Relative Importance. “Technical Requirements” is slightly more important than “Past Performance.”

Attach 12