W911KB-09-R-0026_AM2.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Warrior in Transition Complex (FTW350), Fort Wainwright, Alaska Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911KB-09-R-0026
About this file
Amendment 0002 for W911KB-09-R-0026 FTW350 Warrior in Transition Complex Fort Wainwright Alaska.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W911KB-09-R-0026_AM1.pdf | ||
| RFP-FTW350 Phase 1.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
PROJECT TITLE: FTW350 Warrior In Transition Complex, Fort Wainw right, Alaska
PHASE 1 PROPOSAL DUE DATE IS UNCHANGED and remains 3 September 2009, 12:00 PM Alaska Time.
This amendment provides changes to the solicitation as indicated on page 2 of this document.
PLEASE MARK THE OUTSIDE OF ENVELOPE IN WHICH PROPOSAL IS SUBMITTED TO SHOW AMENDMENTS RECEIVED. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS AMENDMENT ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THE STANDARD FORM 1442.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
1 2
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 26-Aug-2009
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB-09-R-0026
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
03-Aug-2009
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
26-Aug-2009
CODE
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK
CEPOA-CT (W911KB)
PO BOX 6898
ELMENDORF AFB AK 99506-0898
W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
W911KB-09-R-0026
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
AMEND 2
a. The following drawings are substituted for the superseded drawings.
NONE.
b. The following revised documents are substituted for the superseded documents. The identifier “AM#2” appears before and after new and/or revised material, except as noted below.
SECTION 00 22 10, Phase 1 of 2 Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures Revised paragraphs 5.1.2.1, 5.2.1 and 6.1.1 (Issuing page 4 through 6 only)
NOTE: Revisions within the following documents do not contain the above referenced identifiers.
c. The following section (including submittal registers) is deleted
d. The following documents are added.
WT Soldier & Family Assistance Center Standard Design (Drawings SF-1 and SF-2)* WT Small Company Headquarters Standard Design (Drawing SH-3)* WT Barracks Standard Design (Drawing SB-1 through SB-4)*
*Note: These drawings will be reissued with the Phase 2 documents.
e. The following revisions are incorporated.
f. Other:
(End of Summary of Changes)
SECTION 00 22 10 W911KB-09-R-0026
R0002 FTW350
Section 00 22 10 Page 4
4.1. Submit the SF 1442, completed and signed by a person authorized by the Offeror. Include the completed proposal data sheet (See attachment 1, provided at the end of this Section). Also include joint venture agreement or LLC Certificate of Organization, Articles of Organization and the Operating Agreement, if applicable (see Section 00 21 00, paragraph 1.12).
5.0 TAB B – FACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE
5.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
5.1.1. The prime contractor and the design firm(s) (or prime contractor if design is to be self-performed) shall each demonstrate recent, relevant experience on similar projects, using Construction – Specialized Experience form – (Attachment 2), and Designer – Specialized Experience Form – (Attachment 3) at the end of the section. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements. If the offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Submit projects AM#1…deleted text …AM#1 that are currently well underway (designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer that five (5) years preceding the date of this Solicitation. Design firms may list prime contractors they have worked for or government, private or commercial customers. The offeror shall select the design firm(s). If projects were design-build, so identify them.
AM#1…The prime contractor and the design firm(s) shall each submit no more than a total of five (5) projects to demonstrate experience on the following Warrior in Transition facility types or their equivalent or similar commercial or institutional type:…AM#1
Warriors in Transition Complex
• Warriors in Transition (WT) Barracks - Apartment Building
• Warriors in Transition Unit Administration Services - Office Building
• Warriors in Transition Soldier & Family Assistance Center - Community Center
5.1.2. The offeror may provide a supplemental narrative (not project lists), not to exceed two pages, explaining how any corporate experience that is not directly related to the specific projects above is applicable to this project and how the Government will benefit. The following information may be considered.
5.1.2.1. The offeror should describe any previous teaming experience between current team members, if not described in the project AM#2…experience sheets …AM#2. Describe team members’ experience on LEED projects, if not included on the project AM#2…experience sheets …AM#2. Offeror may describe design-build experience on other type projects. The above information is limited to projects that are well underway or that have been completed and turned over no longer than the past five years preceding the date of this solicitation.
5.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:
5.2.1. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related experience of the prime contractor and design firms in design, construction or design-build, as relevant to their role on this project. If the design will be accomplished in-house, rather than by subcontract, then the design element of specialized experience will still be evaluated, realizing that the work is being done in-house. Experience on the similar projects identified in the
Section 00 22 10 Page 5 project AM#2…experience sheets …AM#2 will receive more consideration than experience provided in the supplemental narrative. The Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations. Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience.
5.2.2. The Offeror must submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience in both design and construction, for the facility types (which may include similar state or local government or private counterparts) included in this contract, as described in Section 00 22 10. Recent experience includes projects well underway (see above criteria) or those completed and turned over within five (5) years of the proposal issue date for this RFP for design or construction experience. Joint Venture partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project.
5.2.3. The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Corps of Engineers Construction Contractor (or Architect-Engineer) Appraisal Support System (CCASS/ACASS), other DOD or Government appraisal systems or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.
5.2.4. To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Offeror and its proposed design firm(s) shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project. However, a firm may receive credit for relevant experience of a parent or affiliate company if the firm’s proposal demonstrates that the resources of the parent or affiliate will affect performance of the offeror.
5.2.5. The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:
(1) Number, size, type work, complexity, location
(2) Dates (well under way or completed no more than 5 years preceding date of Solicitation)
(3) Firm's role and extent of work self-performed (brokering out all work and simply “pouring the sidewalks” on a cited project are examples of less relevant experience)
5.2.6. Previous design-build experience is not necessary for an acceptable rating. The Government may consider previous D-B experience a strength, even if the experience is on different type projects than this project. Similarly, the Government may consider previous recent teaming experience among the team members as value added, even if on different type design and/or construction projects than this project. The more relevant the experience, the more credit will be given.
5.2.7. The firm(s) preparing the design must demonstrate qualifications and experience in sustainable design and development and design, based on project experience on projects that have achieved US Green Building Council’s LEED certification or were certifiable at LEED silver or better or project experience on completed Corps of Engineers design-build projects that were validated as having achieving LEED silver rating for an acceptable
Section 00 22 10 Page 6 rating. Additional consideration will be given if both the constructor and the design firm(s) demonstrate qualifications and experience on LEED.
6.0 TAB B – FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE
6.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
6.1.1. Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner's perspective. The Offeror and its design firm(s) (or prime contractor if design is to be self-performed) shall provide customer reference name(s), company affiliation and current phone numbers on the specific project experience sheets in AM#2…TAB B, Factor 1…AM#2. The Government will use the specific project experience sheets submitted for specialized experience in AM#2…TAB B, Factor 1…AM#2 that were completed or well underway (as defined above) within five (5) years preceding the date of the solicitation. (no separate submittal for past performance for those projects, here). Include the performance rating by the owner on the form, if the Offeror was rated. Additional past performance examples may be submitted for consideration on any member of a Teaming Arrangement that will perform a major or critical aspect of the project. Projects cited shall be currently well underway (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or construction substantially completed within five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation. The Government may contact and interview the points of contact and reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the listed reference, if the listed reference is not available.
See the Interview form at the end of this Section (attachment 4). The team members may also briefly provide information on problems encountered on identified contracts and the team member’s corrective action.
6.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:
6.2.1. The Government will perform a risk assessment, considering the degree of success of the D-B team's recent (well under way or turned over no longer than 5 years preceding the date of this solicitation), relevant experience.
See explanation of “well underway” and relevancy under the Factor “Specialized Experience”. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of design or construction, timeliness, management of the work subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and designer or contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, correcting design or construction errors, warranty work, etc. (see the interview form at attachment 4). The Government will target areas covered in the requirements of this proposal including records of conforming to quality, schedule, cost control, customer satisfaction, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, problem resolution for design or construction errors, warranty work, and safety. The Government will not release the Interview Forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased interview comments. The Government also places a higher value on projects, which document successful outcomes and are supported by outside source confirmation, for example, but not limited to telephone interviews with points of contact identified in the proposal, CCASS/ACASS or other agency performance databases, offeror furnished references, or personal knowledge. The Government also places a higher value on projects, which provided particularly difficult or unique challenges and the innovative methods the contractor used to resolve problems successfully. The Government’s evaluation is not limited to past performance information on the cited example projects.
SFAC_small.dgn 10/8/2008 8:50:24 AM
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Rectangle
Rectangle
SFAC_small_EP1.dgn 10/8/2008 12:26:13 PM
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
Polygon
WT FP SM HQ.dgn 10/8/2008 9:52:09 AM
Polygon
675MODULE_Floorplan.dgn 10/8/2008 8:36:47 AM
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Rectangle
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
530MODULE_Floorplan.dgn 10/8/2008 8:35:09 AM
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
675MODULE_IntElevs.dgn 10/8/2008 8:40:55 AM
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
530MODULE_IntElevs.dgn 10/8/2008 8:48:09 AM
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
M2EDTRJR
Polygon
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .