Attachment J12 - FSTSS Traceability Matrix_Amend 0002.pdf
PDF 107 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-22-R-0003
About this file
This document outlines the requirements for a federal solicitation seeking flight school training support services. The U.S. Army is soliciting proposals to provide contractor-operated and maintained training simulation services including high and medium fidelity flight simulators for rotary wing aircraft. Key capabilities required include UH-72A, UH-60L, UH-60M, CH-47F and AH-64E instrument and operational flight simulators as well as reconfigurable collective training devices. The contractor will also provide a training support and management oversight function. All simulators will be contractor owned and operated. Proposals are due no later than February 2nd, 2022 with the contract supporting the Army Aviation Center of Excellence's individual, crew and collective training programs. The document provides details on the required response format and points of contact for any questions.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Relevant PWS paragraphs include:
Section L Section M
1.3., 2.1., 2.2., 2.3., 2.4., 3.3, 3.7., 3.8., 3.9., 3.10., 3.11., 3.15., IMS in 1.3. and 3.3.
Factor 1‐ Subfactor 1. The Offeror shall describe their approach to meeting the simulation training capability of the PWS by describing their training system solution(s) used to develop, integrate, test, produce, install, manage, operate and maintain a simulation training capability that meets the FSTSS Simulation requirements as defined in the PWS. The Offeror shall provide their timeline to achieve the required start date of 01 April 2023 with Services Accreditation and declaration of RFT, with the exception of the AH‐64E Individual/Crew training requirements. The Offeror shall provide their approach, including timeline, to achieving their proposed Services Accreditation and declaration of RFT for the AH‐64E requirements.
The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s approach to meeting the simulation training capability of the PWS by describing their training system solution(s) used to develop, integrate, test, produce, install, manage, operate, and maintain a simulation training capability that meets the FSTSS Simulation requirements as defined in the PWS. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s plan to meet Services Accreditation to achieve RFT on 01 April 2023, and the plan to meet the Offeror’s proposed timeline for Services Accreditation and declaration of RFT for the AH‐64E requirements.
2.1.1. Factor 1‐ Subfactor 2. The Offeror shall describe their approach to using existing Fort Rucker on‐post facilities and proposed off post facilities.
... the Government will evaluate the Offeror’s approach to using existing Fort Rucker on‐post facilities and proposed off post facilities.
5 Factor 1‐ Subfactor 2. The Offeror shall describe their transportation plan to and from any off post facilities.
The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s transportation plan to and from any off post facilities.
4 Factor 1‐ Subfactor 2. The Offeror shall describe their telephone service, internet service, NIPR support, and LAN and WAN connection plans for the capability to support classified and unclassified operations, training, and device interoperability.
The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s telephone service, internet service, NIPR support, and LAN and WAN connection plans for the capability to support classified and unclassified operations, training, and device interoperability.
4 Factor 1‐ Subfactor 2. The Offeror shall describe their plan to support and expand, as necessary, the existing USAACE networks to fully support all FSTSS requirements.
The Government will assess the Offeror’s plan to support and expand, as necessary, the existing USAACE networks to fully support all FSTSS networking requirements.
3.8.1, 3.8.2, 3.9.1., 3.10.2. Factor 1‐ Subfactor 3. The Offeror shall describe their approach to identifying the proposed quantities of each VS and AAVS simulator that the Offeror intends to provide to support normal and increased student loads (10% surge) if necessary, based on mobilization or other training requirements.
...the Government will evaluate the Offeror’s effectiveness in supporting student training loads using the identified proposed quantities of each VS and AAVS simulator. The Government will assess the Offeror’s capability to accommodate normal and increased student loads (10% surge if necessary), based on mobilization or other training requirements.
3.8.1, 3.8.2, 3.9.1., 3.10.2. Factor 1‐ Subfactor 3. The Offeror shall describe how training surge and device availability have been factored into the device quantity.
The Government will evaluate how training surge and device availability have been factored into the device quantity.
3.12., 3.13., 3.14., 3.15., 3.17. Factor 1‐ Subfactor 3. The Offeror shall describe how they intend to meet device requirements for functionality and fidelity; the visual system; command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, cyber, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C5ISR); Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS), and High Level Architecture (HLA) compliance; networkability; concurrency; technology upgrades; terrain data bases; Ready For Training (RFT) accreditation; and configuration management.
The Government will evaluate how the Offeror will meet device requirements for functionality and fidelity; the visual system;
command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, cyber, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C5ISR); Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS), and High Level Architecture (HLA) compliance; networkability; concurrency; technology upgrades;
terrain data bases; Ready For Training (RFT) accreditation; and configuration management.
1.3, 3.3, 3.5 Factor 2‐ Subfactor 1. The Offeror shall describe their overall Program Management Plan (PMP) to include the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the Integrated Master Plan (IMP) to include schedule and performance information throughout the life cycle of the program.
..the Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the Offeror's PMP to include the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the Integrated Master Plan (IMP) to include schedule and performance information throughout the life cycle of the program. The evaluation will be based on the contractors proposed events planned in the IMP to support successful completion of the activities as detailed in the submitted IMS to meet program requirements for services start date.
1.3., 3.3, 3.5 Factor 2 ‐ Subfactor 1. The Contractor shall prepare a Program Management Plan (PMP). The PMP shall include an IMS, IMP, equipment/ facilities management plans, and detailed organization data to include a program organization diagram & program/functional organization relationship charts.
The Government will evaluate the PMP, IMS, IMP, equipment/ facilities management plans, and detailed organization data to include a program organization diagram & program/functional organization relationship charts.
3.6. Factor 2‐ Subfactor 2. The Offeror shall describe their approach to providing a scheduling capability and provide a Student Training Scheduling Plan for overall training support requests from the supported organizations on Fort Rucker, including NG and Reserve units.
...the Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the Offeror's Student Training Scheduling Plan to support requesting organizations on Fort Rucker, including NG and Reserve units.
3.6. Factor 2‐ Subfactor 2. The Offeror must include their proposed solution to support manual and automated requests.
The Government will assess the Offeror's proposed solution to support manual and automated requests.
3.6. Factor 2‐ Subfactor 2. The Offeror must include their plan to manage assets during scheduling conflicts and maintenance issues and their plan to schedule and prioritize any make‐up training time missed by the student due to schedule conflicts and/ or maintenance.
The Government will evaluate the Offeror's plan to manage assets during scheduling conflicts and maintenance issues and their plan to schedule and prioritize any make‐up training time missed by the student due to schedule conflicts and unscheduled maintenance.
6.8. Factor 2‐ Subfactor 3. The Offeror shall provide documentation verifying their capability to receive accreditation for a Secret Security Clearance prior to the declared RFT date of 01 April 2023, and the Offeror’s proposed RFT date for the
AH‐64E.
The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s documentation verifying the capability of the Offeror to receive accreditation for a Secret security clearance prior to the declarations of RFT.
6.8. Factor 2‐ Subfactor 3. The Offeror shall describe their plan to maintain the accreditation at the Secret level for the life cycle of the program.
The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s plan to maintain the accreditation at the Secret level for the life cycle of the program.
6.8. Factor 2‐ Subfactor 3. The Offeror shall describe their reaccreditation plan should any security inspection result in the loss of their security clearance.
The Government will review and assess the Offeror’s reaccreditation plan should any security inspection result in the loss of the Offeror’s security clearance.
6.8. Factor 2‐ Subfactor 3. The Offeror shall include physical security program and credentials of their Facility Security Officer (FSO).
The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s physical security program and assess the credentials of the Offeror’s Facility Security Officer (FSO).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .