SF-30 Amendment 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this solicitation amendment is to:

(see Amendment 0001 Continuation Page for details).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 20

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Jan-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W900KK21R0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Jan-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Jan-2021

CODE

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ORLANDO

ATTN: BRAVO DIVISION

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

W900KK 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W900KK21R0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 01 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following changes were made to the solicitation on Amendment 0001:

1. The following clauses were added:

‐ 52.245-9 – USE AND CHARGES

‐ 252.211-7003 – ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION

‐ 252.204-7019 - NOTICE OF NIST SP 800-171 DOD ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS

‐ 252.204-7020 - NIST SP 800-171 DOD ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS

2. The Performance Work Statement (Attachment 01) was revised on pages 12-13 to incorporate recommended changes in regards to property management.

3. A Property Management Plan (PMP) review checklist was added as Attachment 08.

4. Section H was deleted.

5. The industry questions and answers from the initial solicitation are attached for further guidance to offerors.

6. Revised proposal due date to 17 FEB 2021/1400 EST.

7. Added a revised CDRL packet as Exhibit A, incorporating CDRL A023 – Government Furnished Property Inventory and Forecasting Report.

All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0005

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Year 1: The contractor shall report manpower data for contract performance during Year 1 of the contract into the System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) IAW FAR 52.204-14 - Service Contract Reporting Requirements.

This CLIN is Not Separately Priced.

To:

Year 1: The contractor shall report manpower data for contract performance during Year 1 of the contract into the System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) IAW FAR 52.204-14 - Service Contract Reporting Requirements and PWS 2.5.5. This CLIN is Not Separately Priced.

CLIN 1005

Year 2: The contractor shall report manpower data for contract performance during Year 2 of the contract into the System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) IAW FAR 52.204-14 - Service Contract Reporting Requirements.

Year 2: The contractor shall report manpower data for contract performance during Year 2 of the contract into the System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) IAW FAR 52.204-14 - Service Contract Reporting Requirements

CLIN 2005

Year 3: The contractor shall report manpower data for contract performance during Year 3 of the contract into the System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) IAW FAR 52.204-14 - Service Contract Reporting Requirements.

Year 3: The contractor shall report manpower data for contract performance during Year 3 of the contract into the System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) IAW FAR 52.204-14 - Service Contract Reporting Requirements

CLIN 3005

Year 4: The contractor shall report manpower data for contract performance during Year 4 of the contract into the System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) IAW FAR 52.204-14 - Service Contract Reporting Requirements.

Year 4: The contractor shall report manpower data for contract performance during Year 4 of the contract into the System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) IAW FAR 52.204-14 - Service Contract Reporting Requirements

CLIN 4005

Year 5: The contractor shall report manpower data for contract performance during Year 5 of the contract into the System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) IAW FAR 52.204-14 - Service Contract Reporting Requirements.

Year 5: The contractor shall report manpower data for contract performance during Year 5 of the contract into the System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) IAW FAR 52.204-14 - Service Contract Reporting Requirements

SECTION H - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

The following have been deleted:

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been added by reference:

52.245-9 Use And Charges APR 2012 252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements NOV 2020 252.204-7020 NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements NOV 2020 252.211-7003 Item Unique Identification and Valuation MAR 2016

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Attachment 1 - ATFS-4

PWS

100 23-SEP-2020

Attachment 2 Exhibit A - ATFS-4 CDRL's

13 19-MAY-2020

Attachment 3 Attachment 3 - Government Furnished Property Listing

28 28-SEP-2020

Attachment 5 Attachment 5 - Collective Bargaining Agreement

40 28-MAR-2019

Attachment 6 Attachment 4 - ATFS Past Performance Questionnaire

4 29-OCT-2020

Attachment 7 Attachment 2 - ATFS-4

DD 254

4 04-JUN-2020

Attachment 8 Attachemnt 6 - Wage Rate Determination

12 11-DEC-2020

Attachment 9 Attachement 7 - Traceability Matrix

1 11-DEC-2020

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Attachment 1 - ATFS-4

PWS

97 04-JAN-2021

Attachment 10 Exhibit A - ATFS-4 CDRL's

15 19-MAY-2020

Attachment 2 Attachment 2 - ATFS-4

DD 254

4 04-JUN-2020

Attachment 3 Attachment 3 - Government Furnished Property Listing

28 28-SEP-2020

Attachment 4 Attachment 4 - ATFS Past Performance Questionnaire

4 29-OCT-2020

Attachment 5 Attachment 5 - Collective Bargaining Agreement

39 28-MAR-2019

Attachment 6 Attachment 6 - Wage Rate Determination

12 11-DEC-2020

Attachment 7 Attachment 7 - Traceability Matrix

1 11-DEC-2020

Attachment 8 Attachment 8 - ATFS-4 Property Management Plan Review

2 22-JAN-2021

Attachment 9 Attachment 9 - Questions from Industry

1 25-JAN-2021

The following have been modified:

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS

EXHIBITS

ATTACHMENTS

Exhibit # Description No. of Pages

Document Date

Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List - CDRLs (A001 – A0023) 10 26 JAN 2021

Attachment # Description Number of Pages

Document Date

01 ATFS Performance Work Statement (PWS) - revised 97 26 JAN 2021 02 DD 254 – DoD Contract Security Classification Specification 4 (At Award)

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS-CONDITIONS-NOTICE

L.1 Introduction. The Aerial Target Field Services (ATFS) will be a full and open competition under primary North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 541990 – All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services. The Government intends to award a standard non-commercial C-Type contract with 60 months of performance broken out into a 12-month base period and four 12-month optional periods of performance.

Proposals are due no later than 1400 EST on 17 FEB 2021. The required method of proposal delivery is via the DoD Secure Access File exchange (SAFE) located at https://safe.apps.mil/. Hard copy proposals will not be accepted.

Offerors shall ensure the recipients receiving the proposal submitted via DoD SAFE are the Points of Contact (POC) identified in this solicitation.

Offerors are encouraged to test the DoD SAFE proposal exchange methodology at least 72 hours prior to the proposal due date/time. The Government will confirm receipt, via email, within one business day. If confirmation email is not received, please coordinate directly with the PCO to resolve issue.

If there are any technical difficulties with DoD SAFE, the Offeror shall coordinate an alternate method for proposal submittal with the Primary POC, no less than 24 hours prior to the due date and time. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the entire proposal is received by the Government prior to the proposal due date and time. The date/time stamp of the last file submitted on SAFE is the official submittal time, all late proposals will not be opened. All proposals submitted must be in compliance with the full solicitation

The Offeror’s proposal shall consist of five (5) volumes.

Volume I – Factor 1 Technical Volume II – Factor 2 Past Performance Volume III – Factor 3 Small Business Particpation Volume IV – Factor 4 Cost/Price Volume V – Contracting Information.

Files shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited.

Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Technical requirements or the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

Offerors are encouraged to use quantitative terms wherever possible and avoid the use of qualitative and subjective terms to the maximum extent practicable. Offerors are cautioned that while the Government will not evaluate every

03 Government Furnished Property/Equipment Listing 28 28 SEP 2020

04 Past Performance Worksheet 4 28 SEP 2020

05 Collective Bargaining Agreement 39 28 MAR 2019 06 Area Wage Rate Determinations 12 6 JUN 2020 07 Cross-Reference Matrix 1 11 DEC 2020 08 Property Management Plan Review 2 22 JAN 2021 09 Questions and Answers from Industry (Amend 01) 1 25 JAN 2021

PWS requirement for the purposes of the source selection evaluation, the awardee/Contractor will be required to comply with all PWS requirements during performance of the contract.

L.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

L.2.1 Failure to submit in the correct format is grounds for non-compliance determination, at the sole discretion of the PCO.

L.2.2 It is the sole responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that the electronic files submitted are virus free and can be opened and read by the Government. Proposal submissions shall not be locked, encrypted, or otherwise contain barriers to opening. All files shall be clearly identified with a filename appropriate to the content (e.g., Volume- I_Technical_Appendix-A). Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including exhibits, annexes, and attachments, if any. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

When submitting their proposal, Offerors shall follow these instructions.

L.2.3 File Packaging. All of the proposal files shall be separate documents in their native format; i.e. xls, doc, ppt.

An Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) version of all Microsoft Word documents shall also be included as a copy. All price breakdown information to aid in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format and viewable in Microsoft Excel 2013. Please note – Self extracting .exe files are not acceptable. PDF documents shall use Adobe Acrobat 9.0 or later. Do NOT submit main documents in the PDF “image.” Teaming Agreements or Letters of Commitment may be in the image format.

L.2.4 All proposal files shall be verified to be free of any virus or malware.

L.2.5 All submitted files (MS Office and PDF) shall be created with textual search and copy functions enabled. Non-searchable signature pages are acceptable, but other submitted materials that are not searchable may not be evaluated, and the Offeror may be determined non-compliant, at the sole discretion of the PCO.

L.2.6 The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

Volume/Factor/Title Page Limit Vol. I – Factor 1 Technical 75 Vol. II –Factor 2 Past Performance Unlimited Vol. III – Factor 3 Small Business Participation Unlimited Vol. IV – Factor 4 Cost/Price Unlimited Vol. V – Contracting Information Unlimited

Note: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government. Documents submitted in their native format will be the control document and take precedence over PDF copies (e.g. difference in page count and/or content).

L.2.7 Acronym lists, cover pages, resumes, title pages, table of contents, cross reference matrices, dividers, index tabs, and lists of tables or figures will not be counted as part of the page count, so long as they are inserted solely for the purpose of reading ease and locating sections of the proposal. Pages marked: "This page is intentionally left blank" will not be counted nor evaluated. Additionally, teaming agreements, letters of commitment, the listing of known materials and ODCs, attached to their respective volume, will not be counted as part of the page count.

L.2.8 Points of Contact:

Contract Specialist Branch Chief / Procuring Contracting Officer

Thomas Halverson Army Contracting Command-Orlando 12211 Science Drive Orlando, FL 32826-3276 Telephone number: 407-208-5654 E-mail: thomas.l.halverson.civ@mail.mil

Jason Jerome Army Contracting Command-Orlando 12211 Science Drive Orlando, FL 32826-3276 Telephone number: 407-208-5868 E-mail: jason.jerome3.civ@mail.mil

L.2.9 Beneficial features offered beyond the requirements of this solicitation will be incorporated into the awardee’s contract. The Offeror will be expected to perform based on the entire proposed approach, including any over-and above features and/or merits contained within its proposal.

L.2.10 All questions/comments pertaining to this solicitation and its attachments shall be submitted in writing via e-mail to the contracting personnel listed above within 7 calendar days after the RFP issue date. Late questions may be answered at the Government’s discretion. The Government will answer questions via BetaSam.Gov Website (https://beta.sam.gov/). Changes in the solicitation as a result of the questions will result in the issuance of a solicitation amendment prior to the deadline for final proposal submissions. The Government requires that the proposal, in its entirety, be valid for at least one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days. The Offeror shall insert the validity date in Block 12 of the SF33.

L.2.11 Information previously submitted to the Government should be assumed unavailable during this proposal evaluation and source selection process. Proposal data shall not be incorporated into the proposal by referring to another proposal volume or other source (i.e., Volume I making reference to Volume II). For Volume I – Factor 1 – Technical, the Offerors may refer to another element within the Factor itself. Proposals submitted will not be returned. Alternate proposals will not be evaluated or accepted.

L.2.12 Pursuant to FAR Subpart 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions at the sole discretion of the PCO if it is later determined to be in the best interest of the Government. If discussions are to be conducted, a competitive range will be established and be comprised of only the most highly rated proposals, based upon the ratings of each proposal against all evaluation factors and elements of this solicitation. The decision to establish a competitive range will be made at the sole discretion of the PCO. If the Government proceeds with exchanges with Offerors after the establishment of a competitive range, the PCO will schedule the discussion sessions, and notify each Offeror within the competitive range and provide additional instructions.

L.2.13 If the PCO determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the PCO may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. At the end of discussions (if conducted), the Government will request Final Proposal Revisions (FPRs) from all Offerors still within the competitive range.

All or part of the successful offeror's technical proposal may be incorporated in the contract resulting from this solicitation into Section J. Nothing contained in the successful offeror's technical proposal shall constitute a waiver to any other requirement of the contract. In the event of any conflict between the successful offeror's technical proposal and any other requirement of the contract, the conflict shall be resolved in accordance with FAR 52.215-8 Order of Precedence.

If, after contract award, it is discovered that changes made during discussions were not incorporated in the PWS and/or technical proposal, such changes to the PWS and/or technical proposal shall be considered administrative in nature and shall be made by unilateral modification to the contract, at no change in contract cost or price or other terms and conditions.

L.2.14 Clarifications are not discussions. Offerors may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of the proposal or resolve minor or clerical errors (see FAR 15.306(a)(1) and (2)). Clarifications shall be documented on, and conducted via transmittal of, Evaluation Notices (EN) to the applicable Offeror.

L.2.15 Any proprietary information submitted separately for major subcontractors shall be furnished in the same format, level of detail, and submission due date as prescribed for the prime Offeror. Major subcontractors are defined as those subcontractors who will be providing critical services or whose subcontract is expected to exceed ten (10) percent of the total proposed contract price. Subcontractor proposals submitted separately are considered part of the Offeror’s proposal, including the page count. All subcontractor proposals submitted separately must identify the prime contractor and be clearly marked IAW L.2 and L.3. If subcontractor proposals are late or not in accordance with the other submission requirements, the entire proposal may be considered non-compliant.

L.2.16 Anticipated Award: The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose proposal represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with Section M of this solicitation. The Government anticipates that the award will be made in the 3rd quarter of the FY 2021. This information is provided for use as a basis for schedules and burden (labor, overhead, etc.) calculations.

L.3 PROPOSAL FILES

L.3.1 Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled, including the attached Cross- Reference Matrix within Volume I – Factor 1 – Technical proposal. A Cross-Reference Matrix is not required for any other Volume; however, Offerors may submit their own Cross-Reference Matrix for Volume II, III, and/or IV.

A Table of Contents should be created to delineate the paragraphs and subparagraphs within that volume. As annotated above, each Volume’s Cross-Reference Matrix and Table of Contents does not count against that Volume’s respective page limitations. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections. Standard proposal text format shall be 12 point Arial or Times New Roman font.

All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered (X of Y) and shall contain the company name, date and solicitation number in the header and/or footer. Pages shall be numbered sequentially within each volume. All pages shall be marked: “SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION -- SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104” in the footer.

Additional data use restrictions shall be located in the header/footer area of each page where applicable. The signed Standard Form (SF) 33, each SF30 – as applicable – and Section K – Certifications and Representations may be submitted in Adobe.pdf file format. Microsoft Word and PDF files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – no less than 1” Gutter – 0” From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5” Page Size, Width – 8.5” Page Size, Height – 11” Page Orientation – Portrait or Landscape

Legible tables, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, and alike. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible and can utilize an alternate paper size of 11x17, if necessary. For page-count purposes, each side of an 11x17 page with content will count as two pages. Font size for tables, graphs and figures shall be no smaller than 8-point Times New Roman or Arial font.

Format requirements provided in this section do not apply to Government provided documents, such as: Standard Forms, Section K, DD254 (Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification), Pricing, et cetera.

Additionally, attachments to the Offeror’s proposal, such as: Teaming agreements, verification documents for Vol. I, et cetera, are not required to be compliant with the format requirements.

L.3.2 Cross-Reference Matrix –The intent of the Cross-Reference Matrix (Attachment 07) is to ensure that all requirements for Volume I – Technical Factor 1 are addressed and easily accessible to evaluators. The Cross- Reference Matrix must provide a single integrated index for the corresponding proposal Volume/Factor. The Cross-

Reference Matrix is to assist evaluators during the evaluation; however, the Cross-Reference Matrix will not be evaluated.

L.3.3 Compliancy Screening. The proposal volumes will be evaluated in accordance with the Instruction to Offerors and Evaluation Criteria provided in Section L and M, respectively. Failure of an Offeror to provide all requested proposal information may render the Offeror's proposal non-compliant, and as such, the Offeror's proposal will not be evaluated, at the sole discretion of the PCO. If determined to be non-compliant, the PCO will notify the Offeror as soon as practicable.

L.3.4 All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The Offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. The Offerors shall ensure that each proposal volume submitted contains only the information relevant to that specific volume. The Offerors are cautioned that each volume of the proposal is evaluated standalone against the criteria set forth in Section M and the evaluators for one volume may be different than the evaluators of another volume. It is incumbent upon the Offerors to ensure they properly submit their proposals. If the data is not contained in the appropriate volume of the proposal, it will not be evaluated. For example, if Technical information is submitted under the Price Volume rather than the volume specified, the proposal will be evaluated as if the information was not submitted at all.

L.4 Volume I – Factor 1 Technical Approach

L.4.1 The offeror shall provide its technical approach to satisfy the requirements listed in PWS sections 3.2 through

3.11. The Technical Approach shall include the following:

L.4.1.1 Provide an Organizational chart for all personnel required to execute the entire PWS. The Organizational chart must identify the structure, qualifications, and certifications for each proposed position to include if the proposed position is exempt or not exempt to the Service Contract Labor Standards. Organizational charts may reference a specific location in the Volume I – Factor 1 Technical. Organizational Charts are not included in the page count. Contractors are encouraged to label the Organizational Charts similar to the PWS sections.

L.4.1.2 Identification of all subcontractors, teaming partners, committed distributers and joint ventures. Teaming Agreements, Letters of Commitment, Resumes, Distribution agreements and other legal agreements are required for team members identified. A group of potential subcontractors or vendors can be utilized but an agreement or verifiable proof of an agreement must be submitted. Identify what services or percentage of a service each subcontractor will perform. All partners will be identified as a large or small business in conjunction with the contractor determined North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code.

L.4.1.3 Identify labor categories for each position (ensure consistency with the categories proposed in Volume IV, Cost/Price - do NOT include pricing in Volume I). Discuss back-up rationale and provide calculations showing the staffing build-up that clearly identifies the methodology used to arrive at the labor categories designated for each service category listed in the PWS section 3.2 through 3.11.

L.4.1.4 Provide how the offeror Technical Approach accommodates fluctuating workloads, specifically the ability to surge amount of employees to meet training requirements. Include a discussion of the factors considered in determining your proposed approach.

L.4.1.5 Provide a rationale that supports the benefits of the offeror’s employee recruitment, retention, and development programs. The rationale should focus on maintaining a stable, trained, and flexible workforce.

L.5. Volume II - Factor 2 Past Performance Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to cost or price aspects of the offer.

L.5.1 Past Performance General Instructions

a. Identified Past Performance Contracts: The Offeror shall identify up to three (3) of the Offeror’s most relevant contracts, and up to three (3) of the most relevant contracts for each major subcontractor.

If an offeror proposes the resources of a corporate parent, division, subsidiary, or affiliate the offeror will not receive past performance credit of the proposed corporate parent, division, subsidiary, or affiliate unless the offeror’s proposal demonstrates how the resources of the corporate parent, division, subsidiary, or affiliate – its workforce, management, facilities or other resources – will in fact be provided for meaningful involvement in contract performance. Merely stating that the offeror has access to the resources of a corporate parent, division, subsidiary, or affiliate is insufficient and will not be considered relevant to the past performance evaluation.

Any identified contract must contain performance within three (3) years of this proposal submission date as specified in Block 9 of Standard Form 33 of the RFP (any active portion of performance within three years) to be considered relevant. Identified contracts without performance within this specified period will not be considered by the Government. Offerors shall not identify an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract without referencing the appropriate orders containing the effort similar in nature to this requirement. For purposes of this effort, identified orders will be considered standalone contracts and the Offeror is advised, with regard to this effort, to choose the most relevant specific orders only. Commercial contracts may be included. List the identified contracts or orders from the most relevant to the least relevant. In general, recent performance will be considered more relevant than older performance.

b. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) - For contracts or orders that have CPARS reports that are more than six months old, e.g., the date the Assessing Official completed the assessment is more than six months before the due date for this Past Performance Volume, or contracts or orders identified which do not have CPARS Reports, the Offeror will forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 04) to that contract customer’s Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO), Program Manager or Point of Contact. All questionnaires shall be forwarded in a timely manner after the RFP release date to ensure sufficient lead-time so that responses can be received by the Government concurrent or prior to the Government's receipt of the Offeror's proposal. The Offeror shall include instructions for the customers to send completed questionnaires prior to the RFP closing date and time via e-mail to thomas.l.halverson.civ@mail.mil, while allowing the customer adequate lead time to complete their response. The Offeror shall conduct follow-up actions with regard to this questionnaire to ensure that the customers have received and will respond to the questionnaires. The Government may send any other questionnaires as necessary. The Offeror shall provide written consent from their major subcontractors that will allow the Government to coordinate their Past Performance issue(s) with the Offeror. If the Offeror does not submit such written consent, then the Government will address any past performance issues directly with the major subcontractor and the Offeror will forfeit the opportunity to participate in any related discussions. Consequently, for any major subcontractors that do not provide such written consent, provide a point of contact (name, address, phone number, and email address) with which the Government may coordinate these issues and obtain any responses as needed.

c. Other Past Performance Information: The Government may use information other than that provided by the Offeror in their proposals to evaluate past performance. The Government may use Past Performance information obtained from sources other than those identified by the Offeror. The Past Performance Information Reporting System (PPIRS) will be the primary method used to evaluate Past Performance. It is incumbent upon the Offeror to explain the relevance of the data provided. The Government has no duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds in the information provided by the Offeror. The Offeror has the burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information.

L.5.2 Past Performance Volume Content

a. For each contract or order identified, the offeror shall provide a narrative with the contract data, relevancy, past performance, systemic improvement Information, and notice information as required below. The narrative shall demonstrate the relevancy of the Offeror’s, and if applicable, the Offeror’s major subcontractors’ past performance, specifically, demonstrate the relevancy in the following areas:

1. Aerial target / unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operator and support services.

2. Efforts involving aerial target operators’ support, aerial target operational testing, UAV logistics, and aerial target or UAV maintenance.

b. Contract Data: The offeror shall provide all the information identified below for each contract identified in accordance with L.5.1 (a) of Offeror’s Past Performance proposal in the table format depicted below:

Relevant Contract Data

Prime (P), or Major Sub (S) P1 P2 S1

1 Contractor Name

2 Title of contract

3 Contract number/type (identify order# if applicable)

4 Procuring agency

5 Description of product or service

6 Period of performance

7 Place of performance

8 Dollar value of contract/order

9 CPARs (yes/no)? - CPARS completion date - on DOD PPIRS?

10 Recency (state POP/start and delivery date)**

11 PCO/ACO, Prog Manager or POC and Program Name

12 Point of Contact Info – phone number and email address

** Recency-Efforts performed within the last three years

(c) Past Performance Information: The Offeror shall provide a brief description of performance of the services relevant to the requirements of this solicitation in each of the following areas:

1) Operating aerial targets / UAV.

2) Providing logistical support required to conduct aerial targets / UAV’s missions.

3) Conducting maintenance and pre-flight operations for aerial targets / UAVs.

4) Performing quality assurance with aerial target / UAV pre-flight / flight / post flight operations.

5) Obtaining and training an aerial target / UAV support staff (operators / mechanics / avionics / engineers)

(d) Systemic improvement Information: Identify those systemic improvement actions taken to resolve past problems. Describe the techniques, elements, and tools used to correct problems and, if applicable, how these techniques, elements, and tools will be used during this contract. For each past performance problem identified, describe the status of the systemic improvement efforts and, where applicable, demonstrate the impact that the systemic improvement effort had on resolving the problem such that it would not reoccur.

L.6 Volume III –Factor 3 Small Business Participation

The Offeror shall prepare and submit a standalone Small Business Participation Volume in accordance with the following criteria:

L.6.1. The Small Business Participation Commitment Document, required from both Small and Large Business Offerors, shall be completely stand-alone, and not require any reference to another source, volume, or proposal. The information provided should assume that no cross-reference will be checked, and that all claims, approaches, and statements must be clearly articulated in their entirety within the proposal volume being submitted. The Small Business Participation Commitment Document will be incorporated by attachment into any resulting contract award.

All Offerors, both large and small businesses, are required to submit a Small Business Participation Commitment Document that clearly demonstrates a viable plan for meeting or exceeding the small business participation requirement of no less than 15% of the Total Contract Value. The Small Business Participation Commitment Document shall delineate each 12-month performance period during the BASE PERIOD, and each OPTION. The Small Business Participation Commitment Document shall contain representation from small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), woman-owned small business (WOSB), or Historically Underutilized Business Zone small business (HUBZone). For example, if the total funded amount within a 12-month performance period is $1,000,000.00, the contractor should satisfy the 15% Small Business Participation requirement of at least $150,000.00 over this 12-month performance period. A small business Offeror can meet the Small Business Participation requirement through performance as a small business, or a combination of performance and small business subcontracting.

Offerors shall submit a single Small Business Participation Commitment Document in accordance with DFARS

215.304. The commitment document shall include the following:

a. Type of Business of prime contractor (Check all applicable boxes):

{ } Large (Other Than Small) { } Small (also check type of small business below):

{ } Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) { } Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) { } Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) { } Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) { } Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone)

b. Total Evaluated Price: $_____________

c. Dollar Value performed by Offeror as Prime Contractor: $_____________

d. Dollar Value and Percentage of Total Contract Value awarded to both large and small businesses. All percentages should use Total Contract Value as a baseline. Include only first tier subcontractors. Fill in all applicable sections of the table below.

Dollar Value Percentage of Total Contract Value Large: $ % Small (*See Note 1): $ % Total: $ 100% (*See Note 2)

*NOTE 1: Small includes: Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Veteran-Owned Small

Business (VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB), and Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone). Only include once regardless if represented in multiple groups.

*NOTE 2: Include the Prime Offeror’s dollars and percentage(s). When combined, Large and Small Business totals must equal 100% of the Total Contract Value.

e. The Offeror shall populate the tables below to identify all anticipated prime Offeror and subcontracted supplies/services. When combined, prime Offeror and anticipated subcontracted totals must equal 100% of the Total Contract Value. The sum of the Estimated Total Dollars for Each Service/Supply for the stated small business subcontractors should ultimately lead to achieving the Small Business Participation requirement of no less than 15% for each 12-month performance period during the BASE PERIOD, and each OPTION. The Offeror shall create as many rows and tables as necessary to adequately identify all first tier subcontractors for each 12-month performance period during the BASE PERIOD, and each OPTION.

Pursuant to Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act, a subcontractor is considered a “small business” if it does not exceed the size standard for the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code that the prime Offeror determines for the services or supplies being acquired by the subcontract. It should be noted that the NAICS code determined for the subcontract may or may not be the same NAICS code as the one for prime Offeror’s contract with the Government.

The prime Offeror shall provide written representation (signed letter/memorandum) of the size status as a “small business” for each first tier subcontractor listed as a small business in the tables below; the written representation shall be provided as part of the prime Offeror’s Small Business Participation Volume, and include the following: (1) a statement showing the NAICS code determined by the prime Offeror for the services or supplied being acquired by the subcontract, and confirming the subcontractor does not exceed the size standard for the NAICS code; (2) a statement confirming that this certification is current, accurate, and complete; (3) full company name, mailing address, and DUNS or CAGE code; (4) dated and signed by senior company representative. In lieu of the written representation, the prime Offeror may instead provide the subcontractor’s System for Award Management (SAM) profile, with FAR 52.219-1 (Small Business Program Representations) expanded to display the full text of the clause, if the SAM profile includes the NAICS code determined by the prime Offeror for the services or supplied being acquired by the subcontract; and the subcontractor represents to the prime Offeror that the SAM profile is current, accurate and complete.

BASE PERIOD

Name of Company (Include CAGE Code)

Anticipated NAICS Code for Each Subcontractor

Type of Service/Supply

Estimated Total Dollars for Each Service/Supply

Prime Offeror:

N/A $

Large: $ Small: $ Total: N/A N/A N/A $

OPTION 01

(Include CAGE Code)

Anticipated NAICS Code for Each Subcontractor

Type of Service/Supply

Estimated Total Dollars for Each Service/Supply

Prime Offeror:

N/A $

Large: $

OPTION 02

(Include CAGE Code)

Anticipated NAICS Code for Each Subcontractor

Type of Service/Supply

Estimated Total Dollars for Each Service/Supply

Prime Offeror:

N/A $

Large: $

OPTION 03

(Include CAGE Code)

Anticipated NAICS Code for Each Subcontractor

Type of Service/Supply

Estimated Total Dollars for Each Service/Supply

Prime Offeror:

N/A $

Large: $

OPTION 04

(Include CAGE Code)

Anticipated NAICS Code for Each Subcontractor

Type of Service/Supply

Estimated Total Dollars for Each Service/Supply

Prime Offeror:

N/A $

Large: $

L.6.2. Complexity and Variety of Small Business Work

The Offeror shall provide a short description of the specific services/supplies to be provided and the nature of complexity by each small business, the rationale supporting small business selection(s), and the estimated total dollar value for each service/supply. Complexity is defined as the level of involvement for performance of functions provided by the small business concerns. Increased complexity and variety of involvement for the performance of functions that support the growth of the small business capabilities will be rated more favorably and weighted more heavily than lower complexity or variety approaches.

L.6.3. Role of Small Business Firms and Processes

The Offeror shall provide an explanation pertaining to the process the Offeror uses for identifying, competing, and selecting small businesses for subcontracted work, and how the process will be used to meet or exceed the Offeror’s small business participation requirement.

L.6.4. Commitment to Use Small Business Firms:

The Offeror shall provide documentation regarding individual and enforceable commitments (i.e. signed letter of intent or teaming agreement signed by both parties) to utilize any Small Business firms, as defined in FAR Part 19, as subcontractors. Copies of such commitments shall be provided as part of Offeror’s Small Business Participation Volume.

L.6.5. Compliance with FAR 52.219-8 Requirements

L.6.5.1. All Offerors shall submit evidence of compliance with FAR clause 52.219-8, entitled “Utilization of Small Business Concerns,” for the past three (3) calendar years, from the release date of this solicitation, under three (3) separate relevant contracts. Relevancy is defined as efforts of the same scope of the PWS/Specification associated with this RFP. Evidence of compliance includes, but is not limited to the following: identification of small businesses previously utilized; description of the specific services/supplies provided by those small businesses;

description of the complexity of the work performed by the small businesses; reporting of small business performance in CPARS; and history of prompt payments to small business. A small business Offeror shall include its own performance in the documentation. Any information concerning long-term relationships with Small

Business subcontractors, such as mentor-protégé relationships, supporting the Offeror's past utilization of Small Business on relevant contracts, should be reported.

L.6.5.2. If an Offeror has not supported contracts with FAR 52.219-8 requirements, the Offeror shall so state.

L.6.5.3. Offerors consisting of a joint venture (JV) shall satisfy the above requirements by submitting the information of that of the managing partner of the joint venture.

L.6.6. Compliance with FAR 52.219-9 Requirements

L.6.6.1. Large Business Offerors shall provide evidence of compliance with the requirements of FAR clause 52.219- 9, entitled “Small Business Subcontracting Plan,” for the past three (3) calendar years, from the release date of this solicitation, under three (3) separate relevant contracts. Relevancy is defined as efforts of the same scope of the PWS/Specification associated with this RFP.

L.6.6.2. Documentation of how FAR 52.219-9 requirements were met shall include copies of Individual Subcontract Report (ISR) from the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS); or Summary Subcontract Report (SSR), if the Offeror has a Comprehensive Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Test Program). If SSR’s are provided as a result of a Comprehensive Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Test Program), provide actual achievements that correlate with the past three (3) calendar years under the three (3) separate relevant Government or commercial contracts identified. Large Businesses that have never held a contract incorporating FAR 52.219-9 shall so state.

L.6.6.3. Information on any awards received within the past three (3) calendar years, from the release date of this solicitation, for outstanding support to Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB), and Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges and Universities / Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI).

L.6.6.4. Past Performance evaluation ratings, in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), obtained on management of your subcontracting program, including utilization of small businesses on three (3) prior or current DoD contracts. It is the Government’s intent to receive a narrative from Offerors in response to how they’ve achieved a history of compliance with FAR 52.219-9 within the Small Business Participation Commitment Document, not the actual CPARS report.

L.6.6.5. Offerors not having relevant Government or commercial contracts for the past three calendar years, that are members of a JV, can satisfy the requirements to provide proof of compliance with FAR 52.219-9 by submitting substantiating ISR or SSR documentation from the managing partner of the Joint Venture.

L.7 Volume IV – Factor 4 – Cost/Price.

This volume shall consist of all information, required to support proposed costs and prices. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. The information submitted in this volume shall comply with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, and the requirements set forth below. There are no page limitations for this volume. The Offeror and major subcontractors shall provide their Cage Code in this volume. The specific direct labor rates utilized to price the proposal must be identified in the cost and pricing proposal only.

L.7.1 The Offeror and Major Subcontractors shall submit contact information (name, telephone number and email address) for their cognizant Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) ACO and cognizant DCAA supervisory auditor. If the Offeror is not assigned to DCMA for contract administration or is not assigned to DCAA for contract audit, the Offeror will identify their cognizant federal auditing agency or agencies (and include the individual contact information). The Offeror shall submit a copy of the most recent DCAA or DCMA review letter regarding the status of their accounting system. If the Offeror’s accounting system was disapproved or deemed to be not adequate, the Offeror shall identify all deficiencies along with steps taken, or to be taken, to correct the deficiencies and a timeline to include audit by the cognizant audit agency after corrective action has been implemented. If the Offeror’s accounting system has never been audited by their cognizant federal audit agency, the Offeror shall so state. If the Prime or Major Subcontractor does not have an approved accounting system, the Offeror shall complete SF1408 - Pre-award Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Checklist. If that letter is more than a year old and the Offeror has a more current DCAA audit report commenting on the status of their accounting system, a copy of that report will also be submitted and included in the Proposal Volume IV– Cost/Price.

L.7.2 If applicable, the Offeror(s) shall disclose information pertaining to any proposed Joint Venture (JV), JV mentor-protégé or mentor-protégé agreement. If a subsidiary or JV, then the Offeror shall provide information identifying all affiliates and provide a copy of the binding documentation (e.g. Contract, Agreement, Evidence) validating the legally binding business relationship. A properly executed Corporate Guaranty Agreement should also be provided. DCMA Form 1620 is provided in Section J, and shall be completed and submitted where applicable.

L.7.3 (reserved)

L.7.4 The offeror shall ensure that the information submitted in this volume is consistent with and fully supports the amounts set forth in the SF33 and continuation sheets.