A.09.01_Presolicitation_Questions_-_Government_Responses_051517.pdf

Document Pg # Para # Question Answer

Exhibit E

During the Pre-Proposal Conference, the Government stated that they were actively reducing the number of line items on its property book in this region. Will this attachment be revised to reflect the anticipated quantity of property required after the number of line items is reduced?

No.

Exhibit F

Is the Government taking similar measures to reduce the number of accountable property line items and quantities at

Fort Gordon? If so, will this attachment be revised to reflect anticipated quantity changes?

No.

Exhibit G

Is the Government taking similar measures to reduce the number of accountable property line items and quantities at

Fort McCoy? If so, will this attachment be revised to reflect anticipated quantity changes?

No.

Exhibit B

Exhibit B provides limited information about training requirements by performance location. In order to enable non-incumbent offerors to accurately estimate labor requirements, will the Government provide a corresponding number of historical training events by course and by location for at least the last 12 months?

Yes.

Draft Solicitation 60 1.10

What key control system technology platform(s) are currently in use at each performance location?

There are no technology solutions for key control at the sites.

Attachment 1

Is the level of effort consistent across all three regions in terms of major exercise support, collective training, and individual training support required? Can the Government quantify, by performance location, the number of Army and non-Army customers that each RTS-MED Site Director supports in each region? Can the Government quantify the number of on-site and MTT requirements supported by region over the last 12 months? Can the Government quantify the number of TSRs supported by region? Can the

Government quantify the throughput of students by region?

Will be included in final solicitation.

W81K04-17-R-0006 Government Responses 05/15/17

Draft Solicitation 126 6.a

Please confirm that the percentages listed in this section are incorrect and should show the same numbers as the corresponding chart on Page 111.

They are incorrect and will be corrected on final solicitation.

Draft Solicitation 106 Table 1.k

Please confirm that Table 1.k, as presently stated, presides over the PowerPoint slides shown for the Pre-Proposal

Conference.

The final solicitation, when released, is the governing document.

Draft Solicitation 110 d.(1)

Please provide the format for the Small Business

Participation Plan as the Attachment is not presently defined or provided. Attachment will be included in final solicitation.

Draft Solicitation 110 d.(2)

In this paragraph, the Government states that it "will evaulate the proposals to determine which offeror(s) propose the best value in terms of meeting all the Small

Business Participation goals listed." However, the evaluation criteria for small business participation (Page

126) is listed only as Acceptable or Unacceptable. Please clarify the Government's position, as the evaluation criteria definitions for this item as worded presently does not allow for this type of "best value" assessment related to small business participation.

Small Business Participation Plan evaluation criteria will be updated in final solicitation.

Draft Solicitation

Instructions and

Evaluation

Criteria

Current instructions and evaluation criteria listed within the draft solicitation do not contain a structure to provide an offerors management or staffing approach. Currently, the government will only receive a FFP by CLIN / Location with no details of what that cost / approach entails. Will the government consider adding instructions with associated page count for offerors to submit a Management and

Staffing Approach?

A management and staffing approach would be necessary for hiring/staffing qualified personnel

(PWS Section 4) and managing personnel (PWS

Section 5). The final solicitation will include evaluation of PWS Section 4 (Personnel

Qualifications) which the offeror will "provide specific narrative details and/or descriptions of its technical approach with actual methods, processes, and procedures that demonstrate the offeror's compliance and understanding of PWS 4.3 and

Exhibit C;" those methods, processes, and procedures should clearly indicate the offeror's approach (e.g., staffing, hiring, recruiting, etc) for meeting PWS 4.3 and Exhibit C requirements. For

PWS Section 5, the offeror will provide "specific narrative details and/or descriptions of its technical approach with actual methods, processes, and procedures" for meeting the specific task requirements; those methods, processes, and procedures clearly indicate the offeror's approach

(e.g., management, HR, training, etc) to meeting the specific task requirements.