Amendment_0002_-_W58RGZ-19-R-0178.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

W58RGZ

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-REDSTONE

REDSTONE ARSENAL AL 35898-5280

LATONYA L. ROBINSON

EMAIL: LATONYA.L.ROBINSON.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W58RGZ-19-R-0178

2019FEB26

X

X 2019APR12 04:30pm

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 6

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: LATONYA L. ROBINSON

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCAM-NS-A/(256)842-3407

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Service Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

The purpose of this Amendment 0002 to Request for Proposal (RFP) W58RGZ-19-R-0178 are as follows: (1) to update the evaluation ratings contained in Section M, (2) update clause H-8, (3) update Attachment 0003 - Pricing Table, (4) update Performance Work Statement (PWS) paragraphs C.5.9.1 and C.5.9.7 and (5) respond to questions asked by offerors as follows:

(1) Name and address of Issuing Activity: Army Contracting Command, Building 5303 Martin Road, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5000.

(2) Solicitation number and date: W58RGZ-19-R-0178

(3) Amendment number and date: 0002, March 27, 2019

(4) Number of Pages: 6

(5) Description of the change being made: (1) The evaluation ratings have been updated in paragraph G (3) in Section M, (2) updated clause H-8, (3) updated Attachment 0003- Pricing table, (4) updated PWS paragraphs C.5.9.1 and C.5.9.7 and (5) Attachment 0004 are the responses to the questions asked by offerors.

(6) Government point of contact and phone number: Contract Specialist, Ms. LaTonya L. Robinson at latonya.l.robinson.civ@mail.mil and

Contracting Officer, Mr. Charles E. Julian at charles.e.julian.civ@mail.mil.

(7) Revision to solicitation closing date, if applicable: The closing date on this solicitation has changed to Friday, April 12, 2019 at 4:30 PM CDT.

(8) All other terms and conditions remain the same.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0003 ***

2 6

W58RGZ-19-R-0178

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION H - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

H-8 PERFORMANCE MILESTONES

The performance milestones are as follows:

Overhaul

Milestone 1- Induction Report. This is CLIN XXX1AA for each aircraft.

Milestone 2- In progress inspection

Milestone 3- Repair of aggregates

Milestone 4- System assembly

Milestone 5- Inspection

Milestone 6- System Testing

Milestone 7- Ground and Flight Testing

Milestone 8- Delivery

Heavy Repair

Milestone 1- Assessment Completion

Milestone 2- Completion of all Heavy Repair Works

SLE

Milestone 1- Assessment Completion

Milestone 2- Completion of all SLE Works

With award of each aircraft, identification of the individual payment events/ CLINS to which each even applies, evidence of completion, and amount of payment due upon completion of event will be indicated at time of option exercise.

*** END OF NARRATIVE H0006 ***

3 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Number List of Number

Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________

Attachment 0001 PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) (REVISED) 22-MAR-2019 024 EMAIL

Attachment 0003 PRICING TABLE (REVISED) 22-MAR-2019 001 EMAIL

Attachment 0004 RESPONSES TO OFFERORS QUESTIONS 22-MAR-2019 004 EMAIL

4 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M-1 Evaluation Factors

A. Basis for Contract Award.

(1) This is a best value source selection conducted as set forth below in accordance with FAR Subpart 15.3, as supplemented by DFARS

Subpart 215.3 and AFARS Subpart 5115.3 and the DoD Source Selection Guide dated 31 March 2016. The Governments intent is to award a single contract. The Government anticipates awarding to the responsible offeror whose proposal, as determined by the Source Selection

Authority, represents the best value to the Government. At its discretion, the Government also reserves the right to make no contract award at all.

(2) The Government will evaluate each offerors' proposal using a two-step process as described in paragraph D below. All entry gate criteria will be evaluated as Acceptable/Unacceptable, whereas best value trade off will be evaluated using the following factors:

Technical, and Price. The Technical factor is more important than Price. To be eligible for award, the offeror must be deemed responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104, as supplemented by DFARS 209.104; meet all requirements of the solicitation; conform to all required terms and conditions; and include all required certifications.

B. Number of Contracts to Be Awarded. Reference FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors - Competitive Acquisitions. The Government intends to award one prime contract. However, the Government reserves the right not to award a contract at all, depending on the quality of the proposals and prices submitted and the availability of funds.

C. Evaluation of Proposals. Proposals must conform to or exceed solicitation requirements and will be judged by an integrated assessment as being most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. Offerors are expected to ensure their proposals are complete, address all requirements of Section L, are reflective of the evaluation criteria set forth in Section M, and are submitted on the most favorable terms to reflect their best offer.

D. Competitive Range Determination. During the evaluation process multiple competitive range determinations may be made that eliminate offerors from the competition. A competitive range determination may eliminate offerors based on their initial proposal evaluation results, after discussions (if necessary), prior to issuance of the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) request or for efficiency.

If offerors are excluded from the competitive range they may request a debriefing IAW FAR 15.505.

E. Solicitation Requirements (Terms and Conditions). Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and Statement of Work (SOW) requirements, in addition to those identified as factors and subfactors in this document. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable, and the proposal, therefore, ineligible for award.

F. Evaluation Criteria and Process. Competition will be established using a two-step evaluation process utilizing entry gate and best-value trade off criteria as set forth below.

(1) Step One. The basic proposal will be evaluated utilizing the following entry gate criteria on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

An unacceptable rating on any one criteria will result in the entire proposal being unacceptable and, as a result, will no longer be considered for award.

a. MMHP/IAC Certifications. The certification/documentation shall be current or in the process of renewal/extension at the time of the proposal submission.

b. Facility availability. A facility with adequate space to safely perform overhauls for up to three Mi-8/Mi-17 variant aircraft simultaneously and within the defined confines of HKIA Kabul, Afghanistan. Proof of (1) ownership and/or lease, or (2) proof of immediate lease move-in documentation, in order to meet the 30-day induction timeline, is required.

(2) Step two. The offerors whose proposals meet the entry gate criteria at step one are deemed acceptable and will then have their proposals, submitted in response to the instructions in Section L of this solicitation, evaluated. The proposal will be evaluated utilizing two factors: Technical and Price as set forth below. Evaluations of the technical subfactors will be combined into a single rating for the technical factor

a. Factor 1 - Technical. Subfactor 1 will be more important than Subfactor 2.

- Subfactor 1: The Government will evaluate the Offerors process of induction through overhead to determine sufficiency in meeting the requirements as stated in Section L.

- Subfactor 2: The Government will evaluate the Risk Level Assessment Report of the Pre-award Site Survey conducted at the contractors facility.

b. Factor 2 - Price. The offeror's price will be assessed, as appropriate, for fairness, reasonableness, and compliance.

5 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

G. Evaluation Ratings.

(1) Combined Technical/Risk Rating. The combined technical/risk rating includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings.

(2) Price Evaluation. The Government will fully evaluate the proposed FFP Contract price. The Government will evaluate offers for fairness, reasonableness, and compliance.

(3) For establishing the total contract value for price evaluation purposes the following will be used:

Aircraft 1 - Overhaul (From Base Period - CLIN XXXXAA[TT&E] + XXXXAB[Overhaul]

Aircraft 2 - Overhaul (From Base Period - CLIN XXXXAA[TT&E] + XXXXAB[Overhaul]

Aircraft 3 - Overhaul (From Base Period - CLIN XXXXAA[TT&E] + XXXXAB[Overhaul]

Aircraft 4 - Overhaul (From Ordering Period 1- CLIN XXXXAA[TT&E] + XXXXAB [Overhaul]

Aircraft 5 - SLE (From Ordering Period 1- CLIN XXXXAA[TT&E] + XXXXAB[Overhaul]+ XXXXAC[SLE])

Aircraft 6 - Heavy Repair (From Ordering Period 1- CLIN XXXXAA[TT&E] + XXXXAB [Overhaul]+ XXXXAD[Heavy Repair])

Aircraft 7 - Overhaul (From Ordering Period 2- CLIN XXXXAA[TT&E] + XXXXAB [Overhaul]

Aircraft 8 - Overhaul (From Ordering Period 2- CLIN XXXXAA[TT&E] + XXXXAB[Overhaul]

Aircraft 9 - Overhaul (From Ordering Period 2- CLIN XXXXAA[TT&E] + XXXXAB [Overhaul]

Aircraft 10 - Overhaul (From Ordering Period 3- CLIN XXXXAA[TT&E] + XXXXAB [Overhaul]

The contract value will be sum of the cost of each of the ten aircraft listed above plus $1,150,000 for over and above for each aircraft.

The proposed FFP CLINs will be evaluated for the following:

i. Fairness and Reasonableness. For a price to be fair and reasonable, it must represent a price to the Government that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. The offeror's FFP pricing, will be evaluated, using one or more of the techniques described in FAR Subpart 15.4 in order to determine if it is fair and reasonable.

ii. Compliance. The FFP CLINs will be reviewed for compliance with the requirements specified in Section L of the solicitation.

H. Award Without Discussions. As set forth in FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer determines them to be necessary. In the event that discussions are held, a competitive range determination will be made. If the

Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals received exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

*** END OF NARRATIVE M0001 ***

6 6