W56HZV-20-R-0101_Amend 0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

W56HZV

ACC-DTA

6501 E. 11 MILE RD.

DETROIT ARSENAL, MI 48397-5000

ELENA HUNT

EMAIL: ELENA.HUNT.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W56HZV-20-R-0101

2021MAY21

X

X 2021AUG06 01:00pm

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 27

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: ELENA HUNT

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCTA-HDT-E/(586)282-8517

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Service Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

1. The purpose of Amendment 0004 to Solicitation W56HZV-20-R-0101 is as follows:

a. Change Section A.4.2 System for Award Management (SAM), Size Standards, and NAICS Codes:

FROM:

Failure to register in SAM for the corresponding NAICS code identified in paragraph A.4.1 prior to submitting a proposal against the ERS contract may preclude an award being made to your company. If the offeror is a joint venture (JV), each concern in the JV shall be registered in SAM for the type of work it does and shall meet the small business size standard for the corresponding NAICS code identified in paragraph A.4.1. A Mentor-Protege JV, as recognized by the Small Business Administration (SBA), is considered a small business if the Protege meets the small business size standard for the NAICS code identified in paragraph A.4.1. Offerors should be aware of how U.S. SB concerns are defined in FAR Part 19, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Part 19, and 13 CFR

121, Small Business Size Regulations. Offerors are advised to review 13 CFR 121.103, "How Does SBA Determine Affiliation."

See Section A.11 for additional requirements applicable to offerors submitting a proposal as a JV.

TO:

Offerors who are not self-certified in SAM for the corresponding NAICS code identified in paragraph A.4.1 as a small business concern prior to submitting a proposal against the ERS contract may preclude that Offeror from being considered in the restricted pool comprised only of small business contractors (See H.3.1). If the offeror is a joint venture (JV), each concern in the JV shall be registered in

SAM for the type of work it does and shall meet the small business size standard for the corresponding NAICS code identified in paragraph A.4.1. A Mentor-Protege JV, as recognized by the Small Business Administration (SBA), is considered a small business if the

Protege meets the small business size standard for the NAICS code identified in paragraph A.4.1. Offerors should be aware of how U.S. SB concerns are defined in FAR Part 19, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Part 19, and 13 CFR 121, Small Business

Size Regulations. Offerors are advised to review 13 CFR 121.103, "How Does SBA Determine Affiliation."

See Section A.10 for additional requirements applicable to offerors submitting a proposal as a JV.

b. Change section A.4.3 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS:

FROM:

The evaluation of proposals submitted in response to the ERS MA IDIQ solicitation will be conducted on a Best Value basis under FAR Part 15, Source Selection Processes and

Techniques. Each individual TO will continue to follow FAR 16.505(b), fair opportunity ordering procedures to award requirements.

TO:

The evaluation of proposals submitted in response to the ERS MA IDIQ solicitation will be conducted on a Best Value basis under FAR Part

15, Source Selection Processes and Techniques. Cost or Price will not be evaluated in this source selection, under the exception authorized by FAR 15 (c) (1)(ii)(A). The Government intends to award Multiple-Award, Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (MA IDIQ) contracts to each and all qualifying Offerors, as set forth in Section M. Each individual TO will continue to follow FAR 16.505(b), fair opportunity ordering procedures to award requirements, which will include evaluation of Cost or Price.

c. Delete Section A.8 ADEQUACY OF ACCOUNTING SYSTEM

In order to be considered for award of an MA IDIQ contract and for subsequent cost-type task orders, the offeror shall provide evidence that it has an adequate financial management and accounting system and fund tracking procedures IAW FAR 16.301-3(a)(3). Providing evidence of an adequate accounting system is a matter of contractor responsibility IAW FAR 9.103 and 9.104-1(e). The offeror shall complete and submit a Defense Audit Agency (DCAA) Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Checklist

(http://www.dcaa.mil/checklist_and_tools.html ) at the time of proposal submission. Offerors having applicable and current information from DCAA or DCMA shall also submit that documentation. Offerors who have not had Accounting System Reviews by DCAA or DCMA may, at the offerors expense, submit information from an Independent Certified Public Accountant (CPA) verifying that the CPA audited the offerors accounting system and that the offerors accounting system complies with the requirements stated within the DCAA Contract

Audit Manual (DCAAM) Chapter 5-202, Preaward Survey of a Prospective Contractors Accounting System and Standard Form (SF) 1408, Preaward

Survey of Prospective Contractors Accounting System. The Government reserves the right to request that an offeror provide clarification of information submitted by the offeror regarding the adequacy of the offerors accounting system. Any such request will not constitute communications as described at FAR 15.306(b) or discussions as described at FAR 15.306(d), and will not entitle the offeror to submit a revised proposal.

2 27

W56HZV-20-R-0101

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

d. Add Section L.5.5 which states: Cost Accounting System. In order to be considered for award, the offeror must provide evidence that it has adequate financial management and fund tracking procedures to accommodate a cost-reimbursement type contract at the time of proposal submittal. This evidence may include a letter from either DCMA or DCAA that states that the offeror has an adequate accounting system.

e. Change section L.2.3 Single Proposal Submission

FROM:

Offerors are limited to submitting one proposal with one approach to meeting the requirements of this solicitation. An offeror is defined as an entity competing independently that does not share a common parent with any other offeror or , does not have a parent/subsidiary relationship with any other offeror, or is not affiliated with any other offeror (as defined in Federal Acquisition

Regulation (FAR) 2.101).

TO:

Offerors are limited to submitting one proposal with one approach to meeting the requirements of this solicitation. An offeror is defined as an entity competing independently that does not share a common parent with any other offeror or , does not have a parent/subsidiary relationship with any other offeror, or is not affiliated with any other offeror. For this solicitation the

Government will consider Affiliation to exist if associated business concerns or individuals, directly or indirectly, either controls the other or can control the other (control can exist through common ownership, common management, or a contractual relationship such as a joint venture, where members have the power to control performance of the contract); or a third party controls or can control both.

f. Change from Section L.4.1 Volume 1 Technical Experience Factor Proposal

FROM:

L.4.1.1 For the Technical Experience Factor, the offeror shall substantiate recent and comparable experience by providing the requested information below. The offeror may provide up to one recent Contract. The Contract must have been performed by the offeror as the prime contractor. In this context, prime contractor is the party that executes an agreement with another party to perform work. A Contract may include foreign, federal, state, local and private industry Contracts. The Government will not consider the experience of individuals, key personnel, or subcontractors; only corporate experience will be considered.

NOTE: Submission of a Contract that requires issuance of a separate contractual ordering instrument to complete task(s), such as

Indefinite Delivery Contracts (FAR 16.5), Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA), Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA), and Federal Supply

Schedules (FSS)) will not be considered to demonstrate experience without also submitting the relevant contractual ordering instrument(s) to substantiate what task(s) were performed.

L.4.1.2 The Government will only consider recent experience limited to (up to) one Recent Contract. Recent experience is defined as tasks completed on a Contract, or (if applicable) an executed contractual ordering instrument under the Contract, that is determined to be recent. Recent Contract(s) are those performed within three years of the date of issuance of this Request for Proposal (RFP). If a

Contract involved issuance of a contractual ordering instrument to complete task(s) (such as Indefinite Delivery Contracts (FAR 16.5), Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA), Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA), and Federal Supply Schedules (FSS)), offerors should submit ordering instruments that are recent and comparable to the proposed Task outlined in the criteria below. Each contractual ordering instruments period of performance (such as a single task or delivery order, a single work directive/technical instruction, etc.) will be evaluated to determine recency. Contracts, and any associated contractual ordering instruments (if applicable), that are not recent will not be considered in the evaluation.

L.4.1.3 Offeror must propose to one experience Task, which can be from any Category. The offeror is limited to propose to only one experience task. If more than one task is proposed or more than one contract is provided, the offerors proposal may be rejected in accordance with M.2.1(a). Proposed recent experience will be assessed for comparability in scope and complexity against the Task to which the offeror proposes:

Category A - Product Assurance and Test Services

Task A1 - Government support contract that provided test support to US Army vehicles (manned or unmanned); or

Task A2 - Government support contract that provided product assurance on US Army vehicles (manned or unmanned) production lines

Category B - Logistics Management

Task B1- Fleet management support of US Army vehicles (manned or unmanned); or

Task B2 - Publications and software support of US Army vehicles (manned or unmanned); or

Task B3 - Supply chain management of US Army vehicles (manned or unmanned)

Category C - Industrial Base Operations

Task C1 - Operation and management of supply support to include receiving, inventory/storage management, and shipping for US Army's

3 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

operations; or

Task C2 - RESET of US Army vehicles (manned or unmanned; or

Task C3 - Engineering support for a production line of US Army vehicles (manned or unmanned)

L.4.1.4.4 Contract Information: Offerors proposal shall substantiate what tasks were performed under the proposed contract. For the submitted Contract, provide the following information:

(a) Prime Contractor Name and Address;

(b) Contract Number (and delivery/task order number(s) if applicable);

(c) Period of performance (Provide ordering instrument(s) period(s) of performance, if applicable);

(d) Government or private industry contracting activity address, telephone number and e-mail;

(e) A copy of the executed contract cover sheet and/or other content that identifies the entities/parties of the Contract and the execution date;

NOTE: If the proposed Contract is an Indefinite Delivery Contracts, BOA, BPA, FSS type contract, then the executed contract cover sheet of the ordering instrument (i.e task/delivery order, work directive, technical instruction) must also be submitted.

(f) A copy of the complete Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Scope of Work (SOW).

NOTE: If the proposed Contract requires separate ordering instruments to execute tasks(e.g. Indefinite Delivery Contracts, BOA, BPA, FSS type contracts) then the PWS or SOW of the ordering instrument (i.e task/delivery order, work directive, technical instruction) must also be submitted to demonstrate performed task(s).

(g) The offeror shall provide a written narrative that details the task(s) performed on the submitted Contract(s) and its comparability to one or more of the Tasks listed in Section L.4.1.3. Note: Do not provide a breakdown of comparability of the entire SOW/PWS of the current RFP to each of its submitted Contract(s). When citing specific work performed on the submitted Contract, provide references to the specific locations within the scope or other substantiating documents, such as paragraph or page number, when possible. When applicable, in its description, the offeror should specify the location in the proposal (to include filename or document reference with page and paragraph of the past contract information) that further substantiates comparability if stand-alone attachments are submitted in this volume.

(h) An offeror may submit additional information, such as related contractual instruments that enhance the Governments understanding of the tasks performed if it is not identified on the Contract itself. It is incumbent upon the offeror to substantiate what tasks were actually performed.

TO:

L.4.1.1 For the Technical Experience Factor, the offeror shall substantiate recent and comparable experience by providing the requested information below. The offeror may provide up to one recent Contract. The Contract must have been performed by the offeror as the prime contractor. In this context, prime contractor is the party that executes an agreement with another party to perform work. A Contract may include foreign, federal, state, local and private industry Contracts. The Government will not consider the experience of individuals, key personnel, or subcontractors; only corporate experience will be considered.

NOTE: Submission of a Contract that requires issuance of a separate contractual ordering instrument to execute work, such as Indefinite

Delivery Contracts (FAR 16.5), Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA), Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA), and Federal Supply Schedules (FSS)) will not be considered to demonstrate experience without also submitting the relevant contractual ordering instrument(s) to substantiate what executed work was performed.

L.4.1.2 The Government will only consider recent experience limited to (up to) one Recent Contract. Recent experience is defined as work completed on a Contract, or (if applicable) an executed contractual ordering instrument under the Contract, that is determined to be recent. Recent Contract(s) are those performed within three years of the date of issuance of this Request for Proposal (RFP). If a

Contract involved issuance of a contractual ordering instrument to execute work (such as Indefinite Delivery Contracts (FAR 16.5), Basic

Ordering Agreements (BOA), Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA), and Federal Supply Schedules (FSS)), offerors must also submit an associated ordering instrument(s) that is recent and comparable to the proposed Task outlined in the criteria below, and then only the contractual ordering instruments period of performance (such as a single task or delivery order, a single work directive/technical instruction, etc) will be evaluated to determine recency. Any stand-alone Contract that does not involve issuance of a contractual ordering instrument to execute work), or any Contracts associated ordering instrument (single task or delivery order, etc.), that is determined to not be recent will not be considered in the evaluation.

L.4.1.3 Offeror must propose to one experience Task, which can be from any Category. The offeror is limited to propose to only one experience task. If more than one task is proposed or more than one contract is provided, the offerors proposal may be rejected in accordance with M.2.1(a). Proposed recent experience will be assessed for comparability in scope and complexity against the Task to

4 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

which the offeror proposes:

Category A - Product Assurance and Test Services

Task A1 - Government support contract that provided on-site test support to US Army ground vehicles (manned or unmanned); or

Task A2 - Government support contract that provided product assurance on US Army ground vehicles (manned or unmanned) production lines

Category B - Logistics Management

Task B1- Fleet management support of US Army ground vehicles (manned or unmanned); or

Task B2 - Publications and software support of US Army ground vehicles (manned or unmanned); or

Task B3 - Supply chain management of US Army ground vehicles (manned or unmanned)

Category C - Industrial Base Operations

Task C1 - Operation and management of supply support to include receiving, inventory/storage management, and shipping for US Army's operations; or

Task C2 - RESET of US Army ground vehicles (manned or unmanned; or

Task C3 - Engineering support for a production line of US Army ground vehicles (manned or unmanned)

L.4.1.4.4 Contract Information: Offerors proposal shall substantiate what executed work was performed under the proposed contract. For the submitted Contract, provide the following information:

(a) Prime Contractor Name and Address;

(b) Contract Number (and delivery/task order number(s) if applicable);

(c) Period of performance (Provide ordering instrument(s) period(s) of performance, if applicable);

(d) Government or private industry contracting activity address, telephone number and e-mail;

(e) A copy of the executed contract cover sheet and/or other content that identifies the entities/parties of the Contract and the execution date;

NOTE: If the proposed Contract is an Indefinite Delivery Contracts, BOA, BPA, FSS type contract, then the executed contract cover sheet of the ordering instrument (i.e task/delivery order, work directive, technical instruction) must also be submitted.

(f) A copy of the complete Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Scope of Work (SOW).

NOTE: If the proposed Contract requires separate ordering instruments to execute tasks(e.g. Indefinite Delivery Contracts, BOA, BPA, FSS type contracts) then the PWS or SOW of the ordering instrument (i.e task/delivery order, work directive, technical instruction) must also be submitted to demonstrate executed work.

(g) The offeror shall provide a written narrative that details the executed work performed on the submitted Contract and its comparability to a proposed Task listed in Section L.4.1.3. Note: Do not provide a breakdown of comparability of the entire SOW/PWS of the current RFP to the submitted Contract , or (if applicable) the entire SOW/PWS of associated ordering instrument. Only discuss the comparability the executed work performed to the proposed Task in L.4.1.3. When citing specific work performed on the submitted

Contract or its associated ordering instrument, provide references to the specific locations within the scope or other substantiating documents, such as paragraph or page number, when possible. When applicable, in its description, the offeror should specify the location in the proposal (to include filename or document reference with page and paragraph of the past contract information) that further substantiates comparability if stand-alone attachments are submitted in this volume.

(h) An offeror may submit additional information, such as related contractual instruments that enhance the Governments understanding of the tasks performed if it is not identified on the Contract itself. It is incumbent upon the offeror to substantiate what tasks were actually performed.

g. Insert Section L.4.1.4.5 which states: A 15 page limit applies to part of this Volume submission. The page limit only applies to the written narrative(s) required in L.4.1.4. Any substantiating documents submitted in response to Section L.4.1.4 will not be counted in this page limit (Contract cover sheet, PWS, other substantiating documents in response to L.4.1.4.1.1, L.4.1.4.2.1, or L.4.1.4.3.1, etc).

5 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

h. Insert Section L.4.2.1.1 Attachment 001 Instructions

CAGE Code: Fill out the Contractor and Government Entity (CAGE) Code from the proposed small businesses record in the System for Award

Management (SAM). If the proposed small businesses is not in SAM, insert None and see L.4.2.2. below).

NAICS Code: Assign the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code that best fits the work the proposed small businesses will potentially perform. SBA size standards and corresponding NAICS codes are provided here:

https://www.sba.gov/document/support--table-size-standards

Socioeconomic Categories: List any Small Business subcategories (Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned SB, HUBZone SB, Veteran-Owned

SB and Service- Disabled Veteran-Owned SB) applicable to the proposed small business.

i. Insert Section L.4.2.2 Subcontractor Registration or Certification which states Pursuant to FAR Clauses 52.219-8 and 52.219-9 in this solicitation, the Offeror may not require subcontractors to be registered in SAM. For any potential small business subcontractor listed in Attachment 001 that is not registered in SAM, the Offeror shall provide in accordance with 13 CFR 121.411(g), a Small Business

Certification Form (Attachment 0002) from that potential subcontractor verifying its small business size and socioeconomic status. This certification shall contain, on the same page as the size and status claimed, the signature of the official authorized to sign for that firm.

j. Change section L.5.1 Signature Actions/offeror Fill-Ins

FROM:

Provide a scanned image of a signed copy of the SF33 cover page, a copy of all completed fillins for Sections A through K, and (if applicable) a signed copy of all Amendments to the solicitation. System for Award Management(SAM) certifications need not be separately submitted; however, all offerors must be successfully registered and valid in SAM prior to award.

TO:

Provide a scanned image of a signed copy of the SF33 cover page, a copy of all completed fillins for Sections A through K, and (if applicable) a signed copy of all Amendments to the solicitation. Do Not Fill in Section B of the RFP, as proposed Cost/Price is not being requested or evaluated for this RFP (See Sec A.4.3). System for Award Management (SAM) certifications need not be separately submitted; however, all offerors must be successfully registered and valid in SAM prior to award.

k. Change Section M.1.2 Eligibility for Award

FROM:

Award will only be made to an offeror who is eligible for award. To be eligible for award:

a. Offeror must be determined responsible (See Section M.3.6),which includes being registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) -see provision 52.204-7.

b. The Contracting Officer has no reason to believe would likely offer other than fair and reasonable pricing.

TO:

Award will only be made to an offeror who is eligible for award. To be eligible for award:

a. Offeror must be determined responsible (See Section M.3.6), which includes being determined eligible to receive an award based on the requirements contained in RFP provisions contained in Section L (e.g. registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) - see provision 52.204-7) and other applicable laws and regulations.

b. The Contracting Officer has no reason to believe would likely offer other than fair and reasonable pricing.

c. Offeror must have an adequate accounting system (see section L.5.5).

l. Insert Section M.3.5.c. which states The Government reserves the right to request that an offeror provide clarification and/or information regarding matters of responsibility. Any such request will not constitute communications as described at FAR 15.306(b) or discussions as described at FAR 15.306(d), and will not entitle the offeror to submit a revised proposal.

m. Insert Section M.4.2.1 which states The Government may use the System for Award Management (SAM) to verify information provided about the prime and subcontractors listed in Attachment 001. The Government may use the Small Business Administration (SBA) Dynamic Small

Business Search (DSBS) Database to verify any SBA certifications for 8(a), 8(a) JV, WOSB/EDWOSB SBs, and HUBZone.

n. Change title of Section H.12 from: ADMINISTRATION OF SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN to TASK ORDER ADMINISTRATION OF SMALL

BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

o. SERVICE CONTRACT REPORTING

Service contractor reporting of information is required in the SCR section in the System for Award Management (SAM) by 31 October, when a contract or task order has a total estimated value, including options, that exceeds $3 million; and is for services in the following service acquisition portfolio groups:

6 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

1) logistics management services,

2) equipment related services,

3) knowledge-based services, or

4) electronics and communications services.

p. Insert FAR clauses 52.204-14, Service Contract Reporting Requirements and 52.204-15,\~Service Contract Reporting Requirements for

Indefinite-Delivery Contracts.

q. Delete the following provisions:

52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal

52.214-35 Submissions of Offers in U.S. Currency

52.215-16 Facilities Capital cost of Money

52.215-22 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges Identification of Subcontract Effort

52.216-27 Single or Multiple Awards

52.219-31 Notice of Small Business Reserve

52.222-56 Certification Regarding Trafficking in Persons Compliance Plan

52.237-1 Site Visit

52.237-10 IDENTIFICATION OF UNCOMPENSATED OVERTIME MAR/2015

252.215-7008 ONLY ONE OFFER

252.215-7011 REQUIREMNTS FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICER AND CONTRACT AUDITOR

252.225-7003 Report of Intended Performance Outside the US and Canada Submission With Offeror

252.204-7021 CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION LEVEL REQUIREMENT

252.237-7024 NOTICE OF CONTINUATION OF ESSENTIAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES

52.222-24 Pre-award On-Site Equal Opportunity Compliance Evaluation

r. Attachment 0001 is herein revised to request CAGE and NAICS codes of offerors SB subcontractors.

s. Insert Attachment 0002 Small Business Certification Form in Exhibit A.

t. References to section H.16 and H.16.3 are incorrect and are herein replaced throughout solicitation with references H.11 and H.11.3, respectively.

2. All terms and conditions of this solicitation remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

*** START OF NARRATIVE A0001 ***

NOTICE - SOLICITATION CONTRACT TYPE: Due to administrative system requirements, the 'Type of Contract' shown in Narrative A0000 above___________________________________ states 'Firm Fixed Price'; however, the type of contract will be addressed at the individual task order level.

A.1 BACKGROUND/DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION ____________________________________

The proposed equipment related services (ERS) requirement will result in multiple award indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (MA

IDIQ) contracts spanning over a five year ordering period. This contract vehicle satisfies requirements of multiple Government Program

Offices within Detroit Arsenal and other associated Arsenals and Depots.

A.2 MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM QUANTITY OF SERVICES ________________________________________

A.2.1 In accordance with (IAW) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 16.504(a)(4)(ii), the minimum quantity of services the Government will acquire under each MA IDIQ contract awarded under the ERS suite is $1,200. The Government will satisfy the minimum quantity requirement at the time of MA IDIQ contract award through two data deliverable (i.e., report) requirements; one data deliverable shall be submitted six months after MA IDIQ contract award and the second data deliverable shall be submitted 12-months after MA IDIQ contract award. Reference Exhibit A, "Data Deliverable Requirement to Satisfy Minimum Quantity."

A.2.2 The maximum quantity of services the Government is authorized to order against all ERS MA IDIQ contracts is $910 million.

A.3 SCOPE OF THE MA IDIQ ERS CONTRACT _________________________________

The ERS MA IDIQ contract will allow for the acquisition of services which primarily relate to keeping machines or systems functioning or for maintenance, repair and overhaul, equipment modification, installation of equipment and technical representative services.

7 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

A.4 SOLICITATION STRUCTURE ______________________

A.4.1 The Government will utilize North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 811111, General Automotive Repair for the

ERS MA IDIQ solicitation and resultant contracts and task orders as it encompasses the effort likely to account for the greatest preponderance of work. This NAICS code, 811111, will also be used for all task orders issued against the ERS MA IDIQ contract.

A.4.2 System for Award Management (SAM), Size Standards, and NAICS Codes:

Offerors who are not self-certified in SAM for the corresponding NAICS code identified in paragraph A.4.1 as a small business concern prior to submitting a proposal against the ERS contract may preclude that Offeror from being considered in the restricted pool comprised only of small business contractors (See H.3.1). If the offeror is a joint venture (JV), each concern in the JV shall be registered in

SAM for the type of work it does and shall meet the small business size standard for the corresponding NAICS code identified in paragraph A.4.1. A Mentor-Protege JV, as recognized by the Small Business Administration (SBA), is considered a small business if the

Protege meets the small business size standard for the NAICS code identified in paragraph A.4.1. Offerors should be aware of how U.S. SB concerns are defined in FAR Part 19, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Part 19, and 13 CFR 121, Small Business

Size Regulations. Offerors are advised to review 13 CFR 121.103, "How Does SBA Determine Affiliation."

See Section A.10 for additional requirements applicable to offerors submitting a proposal as a JV.

A.4.3 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS:

The evaluation of proposals submitted in response to the ERS MA IDIQ solicitation will be conducted on a Best Value basis under FAR Part

15, Source Selection Processes and Techniques. Cost or Price will not be evaluated in this source selection, under the exception authorized by FAR 15 (c) (1)(ii)(A). The Government intends to award Multiple-Award, Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (MA IDIQ) contracts to each and all qualifying Offerors, as set forth in Section M. Each individual TO will continue to follow FAR 16.505(b), fair opportunity ordering procedures to award requirements, which will include evaluation of Cost or Price.

A.5 ERS CONTRACT ORDERING PERIOD ____________________________

The ordering period for the ERS contract will be five years from the date of the MA IDIQ contract awards.

A.6 TASK ORDER PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE ________________________________

Each solicited and awarded task order will define a specific performance period.

A.7 TASK ORDER AWARDS _________________

The fair opportunity provisions within FAR 16.505(b) will apply to all task orders issued against the ERS contract unless an exception applies IAW FAR 16.505(b)(2).

The Government will establish evaluation criterion, tailored to the individual requirement, for all task orders solicited against the MA

IDIQ ERS contract.

The Government reserves the right to unilaterally award task orders to the successful offeror who submitted a proposal in response to a task order request. The unilaterally awarded task order shall be considered accepted by the contractor unless rejected in writing within three business days after issuance.

A.8 Reserved.

A.9 ADDITION OF CLAUSES/PROVISIONS AT THE TASK ORDER LEVEL ______________________________________________________

Depending upon the effort required by a specific task order, the Contracting Officer may add other FAR, DFARS, AFARS clauses, or any other terms and conditions that may be applicable, to individual task orders issued against the ERS contract suite.

A.10 JOINT VENTURES (JVs) ____________________

To be recognized as a JV as referenced in Section L.5.1.2 and eligible for award of an ERS MA IDIQ contract and any subsequent task orders, the membership arrangements of the JV shall be identified and the company relationships fully disclosed in the offerors proposal

IAW FAR 9.603. A copy of the agreement establishing the JV shall contain the signatures of all of the members comprising the JV.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0001 ***

8 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION H - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

H.1 Authority to Place a Task Order

On a case-by-case basis, other contracting offices having ERS requirements within the scope of this contract suite may be delegated authority to place orders against this contract by the designated Contracting Officer.

H.2 Task Order Pricing

The Government will conduct a cost or price analysis IAW the directions laid out in the TOR.

H.2.1 Labor: Offerors are advised that the proposed labor rates to successfully perform any task order issued hereunder should reflect the most competitive price. The Government may provide labor categories (LCAT) and labor hours within future TORs, as well as minimum qualifications applicable to each LCAT.

H.2.1.1 During the issuance of future TORs, the Government may provide direct labor rate floor rates that, by definition, are realistic and fair and reasonable in accordance with FAR 15.404-1. Proposals that contain any prime contractor direct labor rates proposed below these Government determined rates will be ineligible for award as those proposals below the threshold or floor shall be deemed unrealistic, may not be evaluated further, and may be rejected.

H.2.1.2 Direct Labor Rates are defined as unburdened labor rates proposed on TORs. If required by the TOR, the prime contractor is responsible for ensuring that the subcontractor provide a full and complete labor rate build that provides complete transparency for the direct labor rate component and each indirect rate applied to it along with profit or fee regardless of contract type. The labor rate build shall be provided in Microsoft Excel to include all formulas that demonstrate how the burdened rate is computed. Proposals that contain any subcontractor direct labor rates proposed below the floor of each respective labor category (LCAT) will be ineligible for award as those proposals below the threshold or floor shall be deemed unrealistic, may not be evaluated further, and may be rejected.

H.2.1.3 During the issuance of future TORs, the Government may require contractors to propose a cost ceiling on their proposed Fully

Burdened Labor Rates (less fee). The ceiling rate for each labor category will be equal to the proposed Fully Burdened Labor Rates

(less fee) plus a certain percentage as directed in the TOR.

H.2.1.3.1 For cost reimbursable TORs, the successful prime contractor may not invoice rates that are higher than these ceiling rates in each Period of Performance (PoP). Offerors should ensure that the Ceiling Rates can absorb any changes in Direct and Indirect Rates over the entire PoP.

H.2.1.3.2 When applicable, subcontractor Ceiling Rates will be calculated in the same manner as the prime. The successful prime contractor may not invoice subcontractor rates that are higher than these ceiling rates in each PoP. Offerors should ensure that the

Ceiling Rates can absorb any changes in subcontractor rates over the entire PoP.

H.2.1.4 At the task order level, should the applicable Wage Determination rate(s) increase during task order performance, the

Contracting Officer can make adjustments in accordance with FAR 52.222-43, "Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Labor

Standards -- Price Adjustment (Multiple Year and Option Contracts)."

H.2.1.5 In the event a task order contains a requirement for the contractor to deploy personnel to an overseas location, contractor employees that are required to work in a contingency location are authorized the following adjustments to their wages: Danger Pay and

Hardship Pay. These wage adjustments should be included in the offerors proposal. However, the rates charged to the Government shall not exceed the allowable rates as determined by the State Department for the area of operation.

H.2.1.6 For contractor employees working on a Government installation, unscheduled gate closures by Security may occur at any time causing personnel entering or exiting a closed military installation to experience a delay. This cannot be predicted or prevented. Labor hour employees will not be compensated by the Government for unexpected closures or delays.

H.2.1.7 Contractor employees are not authorized periods of Administrative Leave, at the Governments expense, that are granted to

Government employees by local Commanders for attendance at various Government functions, early holiday dismissals, etc. Instead, contractor employees shall continue performance at the work site as long as Government presence is available, unless the contractor employee takes vacation time or time off without pay at no additional expense to the Government, subject to mission requirements as determined by the COR.

H.2.1.8 Overtime shall be explicitly authorized in advance by the Contracting Officer.

H.2.2 Travel:

Reimbursement for travel, subsistence, and lodging will be paid to the contractor only to the extent that it is necessary for performance of a task order issued under this contract and allowable under the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR). Official travel of contractor personnel away from their duty station that was not identified in the negotiated task order shall not be undertaken unless

9 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

advance written approval has been obtained from the Contracting Officer. See FAR 31.205-46 for additional information regarding travel costs. The contractor shall not exceed the maximum per diem rates set forth by the regulations identified in FAR 31.205- 46(a)(2)(ii).

Indirect rates commensurate with the firms disclosure statement/accounting practices are authorized for reimbursement. These rates may be fixed at time of task order award.

H.2.2.1 Travel within a 50-mile radius (local travel) of the primary place of performance stated in the task order will not be reimbursed by the Government unless the travel is directly related to the mission, as determined by either the Contracting Officer or

COR. The PWS at the task order level will identify whether any routine local travel will be required. The contractor will not be reimbursed for local travel such as attending meetings that could otherwise be held via teleconference. Additionally, the contractor shall furnish any motor vehicles needed in performing a task order. As specified in the individual task order, the Government may provide the contractor with a motor vehicle when:

H.2.2.1.1 Prospective contractors do not have, or would not be expected to have, an existing and continuing capability for providing the vehicles with their own resources; and

H.2.2.1.2 Substantial savings are expected.

H.2.2.2 Fee/profit on travel expenses is not an allowable cost on any task order.

H.2.2.3 All travel costs associated with the employee driving to/from work shall be at the contractors expense and not reimbursable by the Government. All other travel expenses are subject to the JTR and Contracting Officer approval. The Government will not pay any travel expenses for a contractor employee to travel to/from his place of residence unless authorized as Rest and Recuperation (R&R) associated with OCONUS performance. The Government will not pay for any non-mission related travel.

H.2.2.4 The Government reserves the right to request, at any time, that the contractor provide proof of insurance for any vehicle the contractor is utilizing in performance of a task order under this contract.

H.2.2.5 All reimbursable travel shall be approved by the COR, in writing, prior to any travel taking place. The contractor shall submit the following information to the COR no later than five calendar days (unless the task order specifies otherwise) prior to commencement of the travel:

H.2.2.5.1 Purpose of the trip and what will be accomplished during the trip and why the purpose/mission cannot be accomplished via teleconference;

H.2.2.5.2 The number of contractor personnel required to travel, including the name and position title of each traveler;

H.2.2.5.3 Duration of the trip;

H.2.2.5.4 The departure and arrival location; and

H.2.2.5.5 Estimated cost of the trip including airfare and/or mileage, per diem, lodging, and any other cost(s) associated with the trip. The contractor shall substantiate all cost estimates in its request. Any estimated costs proposed shall be on a Not-To-Exceed

(NTE) basis. For any task order(s) containing cost-type CLINs, the contractor shall upload the written approval provided by the COR to

Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) along with the invoice(s) for the reported cost(s) and copies of all receipts documenting the cost(s) of the trip. If the contractor anticipates exceeding the estimate provided in the original request, then a justification shall be provided to the COR, prior to the invoice being uploaded to WAWF, as to why the trip is anticipated to exceed the estimated cost. Any cost(s) that exceed the original estimate shall be approved in advance by the COR. Failure to obtain advance approval from the COR will result in the contractor only receiving reimbursement for the allowable per diem amount(s) or the NTE cost already approved by the COR.

H.2.3 Other Direct Costs (ODCs): Materials, supplies and ODCs are subject to the requirements of FAR Part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures.

H.2.4 The Contracting Officer may require data other than certified cost or pricing data to support task order proposals or modifications IAW FAR 52.215-20 or FAR 52.215-21.

H.3 Establishment of the Restricted Pool and the Full and Open Pool at the MA IDIQ contract level:

H.3.1 ERS MA IDIQ contracts will consist of two pools: a restricted pool and a full and open pool. The restricted pool will be comprised of only Small Business (SB) contractors, and the Government will evaluate only SB offerors for inclusion in this pool. The full and open pool will be comprised of all Other-Than-Small Business (OTSB) offerors, and the Government will evaluate only OTSB offerors for inclusion in this pool. After award of a MA IDIQ contract, SBs may submit a proposal in response to a competitive TOR issued for either the restricted pool or the full and open pool. OTSBs may only submit a proposal in response to competitive task orders issued for the full and open pool.

10 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

H.3.2 All competitive task orders will be set aside for competition among the restricted pool contractors whenever the estimated value of the task order does not exceed $3 million per year. Depending upon the SB MA IDIQ contractors comprising the restricted pool, requirements may be reviewed for additional opportunities to set aside the requirements for specific sub-categories of SBs (e.g., Small

Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business

(SDVOSB)).

H.3.3 Task orders exceeding $3 million per year may be solicited in the full and open pool. However, they may be set aside for the restricted pool contractors at the discretion of the Contracting Officer IAW FAR 19.502-4(c).

H.3.4 At the task order level, if a requirement is solicited solely to the restricted pool contractors, the requirements set forth in

FAR Clause 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting, shall be followed.

H.3.5 In accordance with 13 CFR 121.404(a)(1)(i), the offeror's size status will be determined at the time initial proposals are submitted for the MA IDIQ contracts. If a business is small at the time it submits its proposal for the MA IDIQ contracts, the business remains small for each task order unless the Contracting Officer requests a new size certification in connection with a specific task order. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to request a size certification in connection with a specific task order. H.4. Task

Order Competition for Restricted and Full and Open Pools:

H.4.1.3 Task Orders Above the SAT: Task order competitions may be set aside for the restricted pool (comprised of only SBs) based on the

Government's estimated value of the requirement. All competitive task orders will be set aside for competition among the restricted pool contractors whenever the estimated value of the task order exceeds the Simplified Acquisition Threshold but does not exceed $3 million per year. Depending on the mix of contractors that receive MA IDIQ contracts, the SBSAs may be reviewed for opportunities to further set aside the requirements for specific sub-categories of SBs, (e.g., Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Historically Underutilized

Business Zone (HUBZone), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB). Task orders exceeding $3 million per year may be solicited in the full and open pool or set aside for the restricted pool contractors at the discretion of the Contracting Officer IAW

FAR 19.502-4(c) and paragraph H.3.

H.4.1.3.1 Prior to issuance, Contracting Officer will determine whether the requirement will be solicited to the restricted pool or full and open pool. If the TOR is solicited to the restricted pool, at least one responsive proposal must be received by a responsible SB or the Government will re-solicit the requirement to the full and open pool. All proposals received after re-solicitation to the full and open pool will be considered by the Government.

H.4.1.3.2 Restricted pool prime contractors are permitted to propose on all competitive task orders solicited unless one of the exceptions listed in FAR 16.505(b)(2) applies.

H.4.1.3.3 During the Open Season period, Contracting Officer has the unilateral discretion to increase the SBSA threshold established within paragraph H.4.1.3 based on SB utilization. The dollarized SBSA threshold will not be decreased below the threshold established within paragraph H.4.1.3.

H. 5 ON-RAMPS

H.5.1 To maintain an optimal mix of both SB and OTSB prime contractors, ACC-DTA may conduct an Open Season approximately two-and-one half (2-1/2) years into the ERS MA IDIQ performance period during which new contractors may be added, via On-Ramping, to the ERS contract suite. This may result in a change in the total number of prime SBs and/or OTSBs in the ERS contract suite. Any new IDIQ contracts awarded as a result of On-Ramps will not result in a change to the maximum quantity of services anticipated under this contract as stated in paragraph A.1 nor will the ordering period for the IDIQ contract be extended beyond that stated in paragraph A.5.

H.5.2 Open Season will be accomplished by issuing a Request for Proposals that may request a sample or representative ERS…