B08 Attachment 0002 Past Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 231 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J-22-R-0001
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and federal contract opportunity solicitation. The past performance questionnaire requests feedback on a contractor's performance on a prior contract to supply parachutes for various artillery and mortar illumination ammunition. It asks the respondent to evaluate the contractor's compliance with specifications, project management, timeliness, cost control, and overall performance on a scale of exceeds to unsatisfactory. The federal contract opportunity solicitation seeks proposals to supply 60mm, 81mm, 105mm, 120mm, 155mm drogue and main parachutes for illumination ammunition over five one-year ordering periods. The solicitation will result in awards of up to two fixed-price IDIQ contracts to one or more small businesses. The solicitation is restricted to offers from U.S., outlying areas and Canada concerns.
View the file
Other files
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND ROCK ISLAND
3055 RODMAN AVENUE
ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-8000
Attachment 0002 Past Performance Questionnaire
J
Dear Sir or Madam
The Army Contracting Command - Rock Island (ACC-RI) is acquiring the 60mm / 81mm / 120mm / 105mm / 155mm (Main & Drogue) Parachutes for Artillery and Mortar Illuminating Ammunition, and 81mm Flash Bang Munition Parachutes. Requirements include the purchase of various quantities over five ordering periods (60 months total) along with delivery associated Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) items.
The U.S. Army is conducting a performance risk assessment in anticipation of a possible contract award. An Offeror interested in proposing on this work has identified you as a Point of Contact (POC) on a past or present contract, which the Offeror deems relevant to this effort. We are, therefore, requesting your assistance in completing the attached Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire so that we may evaluate the Offeror in the area of past performance. The Questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the Offeror’s performance on the contract identified and any additional information that your organization deems relevant to your evaluation team. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.
Please complete the below questionnaire and submit to the Contracting Officer, Ms.
Kathleen Ward (Kathleen.m.ward20.civ@army.mil and Contract Specialist, Ms. Chelsey Love (Chelsey.m.love.civ@army.mil)
Sincerely, Procuring Contracting Officer Munitions & Industrial Base Directorate Branch A C
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Compliance of Products, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship.
Past Performance Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire within 15 days after receipt.
Thank you.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact Respondent)
Exceeds Contractual Requirements (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Meets Contractual Requirements Failed to Meet Contractual Requirements (Explanation must be provided in
F. Overall
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Product Deliverables, including the Administrative Aspects of Performance.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Project Cost.
Comments field below)
Comments:
Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Exceeds Contractual Requirements (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Meets Contractual Requirements Failed to Meet Contractual Requirements (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Extremely Satisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field
G. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
H. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
I. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
below) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Comments:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer and Specialist identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .