Attachment 0027 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 156 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Holston Army Ammunition Plant - Virtual Library Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J-19-R-0142
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 0027 November 19, 2021
Commercial Past Performance Questionnaire
In order to evaluate each offeror, the Army Contracting Command – Rock Island (ACC-RI) is obtaining past performance information. The Offeror must complete Section II of this Past
Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for each commercial past performance reference and submit it with its proposal.
In addition, the offeror shall send a copy of the PPQ to each Point of Contact (POC) identified in
II-A. The POC will be responsible for completing Section III of the PPQ, and shall submit the completed questionnaire directly to ACC-RI. POC’s may receive a follow-up phone call or email from the Government to confirm or clarify information provided.
POCs shall submit completed PPQs via emailing to the following:
Benjamin Gillen
Contracting Officer benjamin.j.gillen.civ@army.mil
Jacob Harrison
Contract Specialist jacob.t.harrison15.civ@army.mil
The subject line in the submission email shall clearly indicate: ‘[Offeror Name] PPQ W52P1J-19-
R-0142. Message shall originate from the PPQ POC’s corporate email address.
I. GENERAL GUIDANCE
Please use the following ratings in scoring the performance elements below:
RATING DESCRIPTION
Excellent The Offeror's past performance far exceeded the customer's expectations and provided significant, worthwhile features or benefits.
Good The Offeror’s past performance exceeded the customer's expectations and provided worthwhile features or benefits.
Satisfactory The Offeror's past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements.
Marginal
The Offeror's past performance could have been improved. The
Offeror required significant resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Unsatisfactory The Offeror's past performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION
II-A REFERENCE POC
1. Name & Title:
2. Company:
3. Address:
4. Phone No:
5. E-mail:
6. Date:
II-B CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Offeror:
2. Cage Code:
3.
Type of Instrument – Prime
Contract/Subcontract/Other:
4.
If subcontract, identify
Prime Contractor:
5. Contract Number:
6.
Description (e.g., product, quantity):
7.
Contract Type (e.g., Fixed
Price, Cost Reimbursable):
8. Date of Award:
9. Period of Performance:
10. Contract Value:
11. Place of Performance:
III. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
Please Rate This Contractor With Respect To:
A. Conforming to the contract requirements including specifications, standards of good workmanship, and technical direction:
Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
Check
Comment: ___________________________________________________________________
B. Contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed to cost and schedule. What were the causes of any cost or schedule variances or terminations?
C. Contractor’s ability to identify and correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner:
D. Contractor’s level of work effort performed:
E. Contractor’s reasonable and cooperative behavior in dealing with your staff and other contractors (including responsiveness and the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes):
F. Contractor’s compliance with security, environmental, and safety requirements:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .