W52P1J19R0134-0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Cost Plus Fixed Fee

0003 2020MAY18

W52P1J

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - RI

ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-8000

BLDGS 60 & 62

JOCELYN W. RAIN

EMAIL: JOCELYN.W.RAIN.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W52P1J-19-R-0134

2020MAY18

X

X

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 12

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: JOCELYN W. RAIN

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCRI-AD/(309)782-1972

Type of Contract 1: Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Kind of Contract: Other

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

19R0134 Amendment 0003 Draft

1. The purpose of Amendment 0003 is to make administrative changes to paragraph L.2.2(h).

2. Paragraph L.2.2(h) is changed to reflect the file size limitation of 8GB, previously misstated as 8MB. Ambiguous language regarding the file format requirements in the last three sentences have been updated. Additionally, ACC-RI has become aware that the process for dropping off proposal files is different than previously stated. Instructions are corrected to reflect this. Paragraph is changed as follows:

From:

L.2.2(h) In accordance with paragraph A.7, electronic copies shall be provided as Windows compatible files using a secure portal, DoD

SAFE. To submit via DoD SAFE site, follow these instructions:

DoD SAFE Service allows exchange of unclassified files

The URL for this site is https://safe.apps.mil/

Select "Drop-off"

Select "Add Recipient" and enter name "Jocelyn W. Rain", and email "mailto:jocelyn.w.rain.civ@mail.mil " ______________________________________

Select "Click to Add Files or Drag Them Here" button, then upload the files and send.

If files exceed 8MB, add a note to recipient that additional drop-offs will be used.

**DO NOT ENCRYPT the files - leave this box UNCHECKED.

Click on "Drop-off Files" button to complete the transmission.

The technical/management proposal, charts and cost/price proposals shall be in Microsoft Office 2013 compatible format (e.g., Word, Excel, Power Point). File formats that are identified as Text

Searchable Adobe PDF must be formatted to contain searchable text. All elements of the file to include tables, diagrams, charts, etc.

must be able to be searched for text. The Government will not accept scanned or image-only Adobe PDF files.

To:

L.2.2(h) In accordance with paragraph A.7, electronic copies shall be provided as Windows compatible files using a secure portal DoD

SAFE (Secure Access File Exchange). DoD SAFE is a service that allows exchange of unclassified files. To submit via DoD SAFE, follow these instructions:

Email the Contract Specialist at jocelyn.w.rain.civ@mail.mil and request a Drop-off code. If the aggregate size of all files is greater ___________________________ than 8GB, request as many codes as needed to provide all proposal files. The Specialist will then send Drop-off code(s) via DoD SAFE site to requestor email address. Codes are valid for 14 days. When ready to send proposal, use the code(s) to drop off by doing the following:

Open the email(s) from DoD SAFE, sender will be NoReplyTo@mail.mil

Use the URL provided within the email to open the drop-off request page

Provide the claim passcode provided in same email

Select Add Recipient and enter name Jocelyn W. Rain, and email jocelyn.w.rain.civ@mail.mil ___________________________

Select Click to Add Files or Drag Them Here button, then upload the files and send.

Use Note field identify what is being transmitted in the drop-off

If files exceed 8GB, use the Note field to indicate number of transmission. For example 1 of 2.

**DO NOT ENCRYPT the files - leave the box labeled Encrypt every file UNCHECKED.

Click on Drop-off Files button to complete the transmission.

All proposal volumes shall be in Microsoft Office 2013 compatible format (e.g. Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Adobe PDF). All proposal package documents, to include tables, diagrams, charts, etc., must be text searchable. The Government will not accept scanned or image-only Adobe PDF files.

3. All other terms and conditions of this solicitation remain unchanged.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0005 ***

2 12

W52P1J-19-R-0134

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

SECTION II

SOLICITATION PROVISIONS

SECTION L INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFEROR

L.1 The contract resulting from this solicitation will be awarded utilizing Subjective Best Value Trade-Off Analysis Procedures in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.101-1 to select the successful offeror. It is the Government's intent to award a single-source indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract type award, in accordance with (IAW) FAR 16.5/Defense FAR

Supplement (DFARS) 216.5, with a five year ordering period covering September 2020 September 2025. The basic IDIQ contract and Task

Orders 0001 through 0005 will be evaluated. Once evaluated and a successful awardee selected, Task Order 0001 will be awarded at the same time as the basic contract. Task Order 0001 will satisfy the Governments minimum ordering liability. The basic contract type will be setup for award with cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) task orders. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award one contract without discussions. The Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) may contact offerors for clarification, as described in FAR 15.306(a) and

FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), without opening discussions. However, the Government will reserve the right to open discussions, if deemed necessary. In the event that discussions are necessary, the PCO may establish a competitive range. The Government will only consider those Offerors within the competitive range for contract award. Therefore, each initial offer shall contain the offerors best terms for technical/management, past performance, cost/price, and small business participation.

L.1.1 These instructions are a guide for preparing a proposal. These instructions describe the type and extent of information required, and emphasizes the significant areas to be addressed in the proposal. Review the Performance Work Statements (PWSs) contained in this

RFP for further insight into the areas that must be addressed within the proposal. Include detailed information sufficient to enable the

Government evaluators to conduct a meaningful review and make a determination relative to the Offeror's understanding of the requirements in each of the evaluated areas.

L.1.2 The proposal will be composed of written submissions in English. The instructions below identify the information that will be required with the proposals. Each offeror shall submit one offer; alternate or multiple proposals will not be accepted. If revised proposal(s) are required, they shall be highlighted, gray barred or asterisked to identify the changes.

L.1.3 Proposals that merely offer to perform work IAW this solicitation or that fail to present more than an indication of capability of compliance with the technical requirements without elaboration will be deemed to be unacceptable and will not be considered further.

L.1.4 Due to the nature of the evaluation criteria, some duplication of material in the technical/management and past performance volumes may be necessary to adequately address the PWS and solicitation requirements. In such instances, cross-referencing is permissible.

L.1.5 Offeror must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and have CAGE Code upon proposal submission to be considered for award.

L.1.6 Proposals, modifications, revisions, or withdrawals of proposals received after the date established in this RFP for receipt of proposals will be handled IAW FAR Clause 52.215-1.

L.1.7 IAW FAR Clause 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors - Competitive Acquisition the Government intends to award a contract without discussions. Offerors are cautioned to examine this RFP in its entirety and to ensure that proposals contain all necessary information, provide all required documentation, and are complete in all respects. The Government is not obligated to make another request for the required information nor does the Government assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions in the evaluation process and to permit Offerors to revise proposals, if deemed necessary.

During the evaluation process, the Government may request clarifications as needed. Clarifications do not constitute discussions and an Offeror is not allowed to change its proposal in response to a request for clarification. IAW FAR 15.306(c)(2), if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Any Offeror eliminated from further consideration will be notified in writing.

L.1.7 Updates related to this RFP, to include amendments, notices, and other information, will be made available on the Beta.SAM.gov website. Offerors are advised to continuously monitor the Beta.SAM.gov website for new information. Offerors are deemed to have knowledge of all information that is posted to the Beta.SAM.gov website.

L.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

L.2.1 Each Offeror shall only submit one timely proposal that shall address all of the requirements of the RFP. All proposals and related information will be submitted to the Contract Specialist and PCO via email at jocelyn.w.rain.civ@mail.mil and

3 12

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

rock.d.woodstock.civ@mail.mil no later than 4:00 pm CT on the date established in this RFP. No Classified material shall appear anywhere within the proposal. If offerors are submitting proposals 10MB or greater, the offerors must either (A) submit the proposals in multiple emails having no individual email exceeds 10MB; or (B) contact the Contract Specialist or PCO prior to the submission date and time to determine an alternate electronic submission, such as DoD Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) https://safe.apps.mil/ . If utilizing an alternate electronic submission, it is up to the offeror to contact the Contract Specialist and PCO timely so the proposal submission is received no later than 4:00 pm CT on the date established in this RFP.

L.2.2 The offerors proposal shall include one original, labeled and identified accordingly (by Volume including Offerors name, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code, and Business size, and Point of Contact), of each proposal and the following copies:

L.2.2(a) Volume I - Technical/Management Proposal (4 Electronic Copies if providing CDs/DVDs)

L.2.2(b) Resumes of Key Personnel (4 Electronic Copies if providing CDs/DVDs; to be included in the technical/management proposal volume at the end of the Contract/Task Management subfactor)

L.2.2(c) Volume II - Past Performance Proposal (4 Electronic Copies if providing CDs/DVDs)

L.2.2(d) Volume III - Cost/Price Proposal (4 Electronic Copies if providing CDs/DVDs)

L.2.2(e) Volume IV - Small Business Participation Proposal(4 Electronic Copies if providing CDs/DVDs)

L.2.2(f) A fully executed copy, citing all issued amendments, of W52P1J-19-R-0134 (Sections A through M inclusive), including a signed and dated SF 33. If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), all members of the JV shall sign the SF 33 (to be submitted as a standalone document).

L.2.2(g) If applicable, a subcontracting plan (to be submitted as a standalone document).

L.2.2(h) In accordance with paragraph A.7, electronic copies shall be provided as Windows compatible files using a secure portal DoD

SAFE (Secure Access File Exchange). DoD SAFE is a service that allows exchange of unclassified files. To submit via DoD SAFE, follow these instructions:

Email the Contract Specialist at jocelyn.w.rain.civ@mail.mil and request a Drop-off code. If the aggregate size of all files is greater than 8GB, request as many codes as needed to provide all proposal files. The Specialist will then send Drop-off code(s) via DoD SAFE site to requestor email address. Codes are valid for 14 days. When ready to send proposal, use the code(s) to drop off by doing the following:

Open the email(s) from DoD SAFE, sender will be NoReplyTo@mail.mil

Use the URL provided within the email to open the drop-off request page

Provide the claim passcode provided in same email

Select Add Recipient and enter name Jocelyn W. Rain, and email jocelyn.w.rain.civ@mail.mil

Select Click to Add Files or Drag Them Here button, then upload the files and send.

Use Note field identify what is being transmitted in the drop-off

If files exceed 8GB, use the Note field to indicate number of transmission. For example 1 of 2.

**DO NOT ENCRYPT the files - leave the box labeled Encrypt every file UNCHECKED.

Click on Drop-off Files button to complete the transmission.

All proposal volumes shall be in Microsoft Office 2013 compatible format (e.g. Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Adobe PDF). All proposal package documents, to include tables, diagrams, charts, etc., must be text searchable. The Government will not accept scanned or image-only Adobe PDF files.

L.2.3 The proposal shall be valid for 180 days from the required submission date.

L.2.4 Failure to submit any of the above L.2.2 requested information will deem the proposal invalid and the offeror will not be further considered for award. Pages that exceed the maximum page limitation will be removed, not read, and will not be evaluated by the

Government.

L.2.5 Legibility, clarity, coherence, and content are important. Sheet size of the written proposal text contents shall be 8 1/2 by 11 inches where sheets are prepared specifically for this proposal; however, in the case of cost/pricing spreadsheets, drawings, or other graphical material, they may be submitted on 11 by 17 inch sheets and will count as one page. All text sheets shall have a margin on all sides of a minimum of one inch. The minimum font size for text shall be 12 and for graphics shall be size 8.

L.2.6 The offeror must include sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of the proposal. The proposal must demonstrate the offerors understanding of the requirements and the feasibility of the approaches to meet those requirements. The

Government will not make assumptions concerning an offerors intent, capabilities, facilities, and experiences. Clear identification is the sole responsibility of the offeror. Proposal contents that appear to be unreasonable, unrealistic, unsupported, unclear, and/or

4 12

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

deficient will be identified. Proposals that merely offer to perform work IAW this solicitation, or which fail to present more than an indication of capability of compliance with the technical requirements without elaboration shall be deemed to be unacceptable and shall not be considered further. Offerors shall identify technical uncertainties and assumptions within the requirements set forth in the solicitation and provide specific proposals for their resolution. Offerors are cautioned that failure to provide the necessary information may result in their ratings being downgraded accordingly.

L.2.7 Offerors shall comply with all requirements of the proposal preparation instructions. Failure to do so may cause portion(s) of the proposal to not be evaluated. Deviations shall be fully explained. Inclusion of cost/price information in the technical/management proposal is not considered an acceptable deviation.

L.2.8 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). FOIA and its amendment have resulted in an increasing number of requests from outside the

Government for copies of contractors' proposals and other documents submitted to federal agencies. If an Offeror's submission contains information that it believes should be withheld from such requestors under FOIA on the grounds that it contains trade secrets and commercial or financial information [5 USC 552(b)(4)], the Offeror should mark its submissions in the following manner:

L.2.8(a) The following notice should be placed on the title page: Some parts of this document, as identified on individual pages, are considered by the submitter to be privileged or confidential trade secret or commercial or financial information not subject to mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Material considered privileged or confidential on such grounds is contained on page(s) ___.

L.2.8(b)Each individual item considered privileged or confidential under FOIA should be marked by placing the text within {brackets} with the following notice placed in the left margin: Privileged or Confidential. Failure to do so may result in an involuntary release via a FOIA request.

L.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA

L.3.1 VOLUME I TECHNICAL/MANAGEMENT FACTOR: The offerors written proposal shall address the following major functions and is limited to

100 pages excluding standard forms. The offeror shall provide a table of contents for the appropriate sections of the technical/management proposal, tabbed by subfactor as part of its submission. The table of contents may be numbered using roman numerals and shall not count against the page count limitation. The technical/management proposal shall provide the evaluators with information pertinent to the offerors ability to accomplish the LCLS and CDTF O&M requirements, based on the technical/management approaches described in the offerors proposal. As part of the technical/management proposal, the offeror shall provide an un-priced matrix of man-hours by labor category and a bill of materials and other direct costs (ODCs); this matrix is not subject to the page limitation. This un-priced matrix shall be labeled and included at the end of Volume I. L.3.1.1 The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

L.3.1.1(a) Section 1, Subfactor 1 - Contract/Task Management: The offeror shall describe its approach for performing contract management

IAW the requirements contained in sections 3.1 through 3.1.9 of the umbrella PWS and describe its overall management approach for this contract. The offeror shall describe its approach for preparing the CDTF Quality Manual IAW the requirements contained in section 3.1.4 of the umbrella PWS, and the Safety Management Plan IAW the requirements contained in section 7.0 of the umbrella PWS. In support of its management approach, the offeror shall describe the past experience and education of the dedicated project manager and other identified key management staff members, via resumes, and identify these personnel by positions and cross referencing these personnel to the organization breakdown structure and contract work breakdown structure (WBS). The resumes of the personnel assigned to the project shall indicate the extent of experience with their assigned functional area and on a project of similar size and complexity. The offerors organization description shall reflect sound management practices, and appropriate levels of supervision and staff for Quality

Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC), safety, environmental activities, life cycle logistics sustainment support, training activities, facility maintenance, and reporting. The offeror's proposed organizational structure shall reflect the education/experience levels required for each position and shall provide a cross reference of personnel to the WBS elements and shall describe all activities including the interfaces/relationships between all performers (both prime and/or subcontract personnel). The offeror shall describe the relationship between corporate oversight functions and project management as well as addressing how its corporate experience will be applicable to all activities required under the umbrella PWS and Task Order 0001 through 0005 PWSs. The offeror shall discuss how its various business systems will enable the effective management of the various activities of the contract. The Governments objective is to establish a contract/task management approach that relies on the contractors self-directed initiation of and compliance to the PWS requirements with only periodic Government surveillance and/or inspection in lieu of a management approach requiring constant Government interjection, guidance, and direction. The offeror shall describe its management approach for implementing and accomplishing this objective. The offeror shall describe its approach for accomplishing the unique options required by the individual task order performance work statements that are summarized below:

Task Order 0001: PWS Sections 3.4.17.1, 3.4.17.2, and 3.5.1

Task Order 0002: PWS Sections 3.4.17.1, 3.4.17.2, and 3.5.1

Task Order 0003: PWS Sections 3.4.17.1 and 3.4.17.2

Task Order 0004: PWS Sections 3.2.7.11, 3.2.7.12, and 3.3.2.1

Task Order 0005: PWS Section 3.2.2.5

The offeror shall submit a transition-in plan as required by the umbrella PWS Section 3.1.9.

5 12

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.3.1.1(b) Section 2, Subfactor 2 - Life Cycle Logistics Support: The offeror shall describe its approach for accomplishing the equipment life cycle sustainment support requirements contained in section 3.2 of Task Orders 0001 through 0005 PWSs. The offeror shall provide its approach for functioning as a member of the RCMD logistics support providers team that collectively provides the full range of logistics support functions for the RCMD suite of equipment; and for accomplishing their assigned general logistics support requirements described in sections 3.2.1 through 3.2.1.18 of the Task Order 0001 through 0005 PWSs. The offeror shall describe its approach for providing the Explosive Destruction System spare parts engineering support as described in section 3.2.1.20 of the Task

Order 0001 through 0005 PWSs. The offeror shall describe its approach for supporting operations as described in Task Orders 0001 through

0005 PWS sections 3.2.2 through 3.2.2.4. The offeror shall describe its approach for providing the support described in sections 3.2.3 through 3.2.5 and 3.5.1 of Task Orders 0001 through 0005 PWSs. The offeror shall describe its approach for maintenance planning;

logistics and maintenance documentation development and sustainment; equipment system handling and storage (possible worker protection level (WPL) condition); and automated logistics management system implementation, sustainment and reporting. The offeror shall describe its approach for accomplishing the specific logistics support requirements described in sections 3.2.6 through 3.2.8.4 of Task Orders

0001 through 0005 PWSs. The offeror shall describe its approach for establishing a logistics and maintenance leader, and logistics and maintenance support staff. The offeror shall describe its previous experience with providing logistics and maintenance support to similar Government equipment. The offeror shall describe its approach for providing the configuration management support requirements described in sections 3.2.9 through 3.2.10 of the Task Orders 0001 through 0005 PWSs.

L.3.1.1(c) Section 3, Subfactor 3 - Technical Training: The offeror shall describe its approach for establishing and operating the training program IAW the requirements contained in sections 3.3 through 3.3.3.6 of the umbrella PWS, and for conducting the training courses required by paragraphs 3.3.1 through 3.3.2 of Task Orders 0001 through 0005 PWS. The offeror shall describe its approach for determining training needs, course development, determining class size limits, conducting training courses, evaluating student performance and training results, improving the training program, maintaining training records, and applying QA/QC standards to the training program as it applies to 1) general mission oriented training, and 2) specialized equipment operation and maintenance training courses. The offeror shall describe its approach for establishing a training program leader and training program support staff. The offeror's proposal shall describe its training course scheduling approach to optimize the efficient utilization of the CDTF classrooms and high bay area. Additionally, the offeror shall describe its approach for managing third party customers needs for timely and effective training. The offeror shall describe relevant projects where the various aspects of the above proposed training approaches have been used.

L.3.1.1(d) Section 4, Subfactor 4 - Facility Operations and Property Management: The offeror shall describe its approach for performing facility operations and property management IAW the requirements contained in sections 3.4 through 3.4.13 of the umbrella PWS and describe its approach for the day-to-day operation and maintenance of the CDTF campus and warehouses. The offeror shall describe its approach for buildings and grounds maintenance, support equipment maintenance, equipment operation, CDTF activity coordination and support, property management and disposal, warehouse operation, and snow removal. The offeror shall describe its approach for accomplishing the facility repairs required by paragraphs 3.4.15, and 3.4.17 through 3.4.17.2 of the Task Orders 0001 through 0005 PWSs.

The offeror shall describe its approach for establishing a facility operations leader, and facility operations support staff. In addition, the offeror shall describe its previous experience with managing Government-Owned-Contractor-Operated facilities of a similar magnitude to the CDTF campus.

L.3.2 VOLUME II PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR: The past performance volume shall contain only information that is recent and relevant to past performance. There is no page limit for this volume. Offerors shall submit all Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Recency, relevancy, and major subcontractor definitions can be found at M.6.2.5.1(a), M.6.5.2.1(b), M.6.5.2.1(c) respectively.

L.3.2.1 Offerors are advised that both data submitted by the offeror and data independently obtained by the Government may be used to evaluate the offerors past performance in order to determine performance risk. Since the Government may not contact all of the references provided by the offeror, it is incumbent upon the offeror to fully explain the relevance or currency of the data provided and to ensure that the data is current, accurate, and complete.

L.3.2.2 The Government does not assume the duty of searching for clarifications or curing problems it finds with the proposal. Proposals that do not contain the requested information or are not in the requested format may risk not receiving credit for aspects of their past performance, which may result in an increased risk for their performance risk rating.

L.3.2.3 Relevancy will be determined by contracts of similar size, scope, and complexity covering previous life cycle logistics support, training, and facility operation and property management efforts, for both the private and/or public sector. All relevant Federal

Government contract actions meeting the stated time standards shall be included. State, local, and foreign Government contracts and/or commercial contracts may be included if the Federal Government contracts do not demonstrate adequate relevant past performance in all phases of this project.

L.3.2.4 The term offeror includes all team or JV members, and subcontractors performing major project functions (i.e., performing critical functions and tasks). The term offeror also includes predecessor companies of the offeror, team or JV members, and subcontractors which have undergone a name change, novation, or other similar corporate changeover. Data concerning the offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractors past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, 6 12

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered.

L.3.3 This volume shall be organized into the following sections:

L.3.3.1 Section 1 Contract Descriptions: This section shall include the following information in the following format.

(a) Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code and DUNS Number. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, current address, e-mail address, and telephone numbers).

(b) Government contracting activity, and current address, PCOs name, email address, and telephone.

(c) Contract Number to include delivery order or task order number, U.S. General Services Administration contracts, and Blanket Purchase

Agreements numbers.

(d) Contract Type (Fixed-Price, Cost Reimbursement, Time & Material).

(e) Awarded cost/price.

(f) Period of performance.

L.3.3.2 Section 2 Performance: Offerors shall provide a specific performance narrative explanation of each contract listed in L.3.3.1

Section 1- Contract Descriptions.

L.3.3.3 Section 3 - Quality: The offeror shall describe its QA/QC program, processes, certification, and practices; and how it was implemented. Describe the role and authority that QC officer/personnel have with respect to conflicts involving questions of quality and

QC. Provide information and references that demonstrate that QC has been used successfully on previous contracts.

L.3.3.4 Section 4 - Timeliness or Schedule Control: For each of the contracts listed on L.3.3.1 Section 1- Contract Descriptions, the offeror shall discuss any contractor-caused delay that adversely impacted the projects major milestones or objectives. Significantly more important than any individual incident or event is the offerors responsiveness to incidents that adversely impact timelines of performance. The offeror shall address past performance identifying root causes, developing effective corrective action plans and following through with those plans to mitigate the impact and to reduce the risk of recurrence.

L.3.3.5 Section 4 - Cost Control: Identify all instances where the actual cost to the customer exceeded the proposed cost of the initial award. Explain each instance where there were variances. Also explain any cost savings to the customer.

L.3.3.6 Section 5 - Adverse Past Performance: The Offeror shall identify all recent contracts where it or its proposed Teammates or

Subcontractors experienced any performance problems that occurred within the timelines (recency) period identified. For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. Additionally, Offerors shall include the contract number, a brief description of the issue, the corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence of the problem, the extent to which the corrective action has been successful, a mitigation plan of how to prevent similar future issues, and Customer POCs who can confirm the success of the corrective measures. The offerors shall also provide copy of any Level III Corrective Action Reports, Cure Notices, or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the offeror or proposed subcontractor. The offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.

L.3.3.7 Section 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ): For all contracts identified in L.3.3.1 Section 1 - Contract Descriptions, a

PPQ must be completed and submitted. The offeror shall complete Part I of the PPQ (Attachment 0007,) and e-mail the questionnaire to both the Government contracting activity and technical representative responsible for the past/current contract. The POCs shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to the Contracting Office no later than the proposal due date, to (jocelyn.w.rain.civ@mail.mil). The offeror shall e-mail to the Contracting Office a list of all the

POCs who were sent a questionnaire. The Government must receive this list no later than the proposal due date. The POC List shall be submitted in Word for Windows Table Format to include the following fields: Solicitation Number; Company Name; Contract Number;

Government Agency; POC Last Name, First Name; POC Title; POC Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address; and Date E-Mail to POC (month/day).

L.3.4 VOLUME III COST/PRICE FACTOR.

L.3.4.1 General Instructions. Offerors shall submit a proposal in the following contract type structure:

Cost-Plus-Fixed Fee (CPFF) - CLIN structure as shown in Attachment 0008 Cost- Price Matrix and shall be proposed as CPFF. Cost and fee

7 12

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

shall be differentiated for each CLIN and rolled up into a table as shown in Attachment 0008.

L.3.4.1(a) Electronic Copy. Cost DVD-R requirements: Files contained on the Volume III Cost DVD-R may not be password protected.

Electronic links are only permissible within the Cost Volume. If files contain links, the links must be intact and maintained through all revisions. There is no page limitation for Volume III. Proposal information included in this volume which is not directly related to

Cost will be disregarded.

L.3.4.1(b) The PCO will review the Offeror's accounting system status for determining contractor responsibility in accordance with FAR

16.301-3; a cost-reimbursement type contract may be used only when the contractor's accounting system is adequate for determining costs applicable to the contract. An adequate system is a system that can separately accumulate costs under a Government contract and has the ability to generate the specific cost information required under the anticipated contract. Therefore, in order for an Offeror to receive an award under this RFP, the successful Offeror will be required to demonstrate that the design of its accounting system by providing official documentation, from either a successful Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audit of the Offeror's accounting system; or a letter from the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) documenting its approval/adequacy of the Offeror's accounting system; or provide rationale for why documentation cannot be presented at proposal submission and a proposed date for which required documentation will be available. Absent an adequate accounting system, an apparent awardee cannot be determined responsible under FAR 9.104-5 and will be ineligible for award. Per FAR 9.104-5(b), an apparent awardee who does not furnish the certification or such information as may be requested by the Contracting Officer shall be given an opportunity to remedy the deficiency. Therefore, if an Offeror is unable to provide the certification with its proposal as required, it will be given another opportunity to present the required certification prior to award in the event it is determined to be the apparent awardee.

L.3.4.2 The Cost/Price Volume shall be fully supported IAW the instructions detailed below.

MAJOR SUBCONTRACTOR: As used in this factor, is any subcontract expected to perform in excess of 20% of the total value of the contract or whose performance is considered critical.

L.3.4.2(a) The Offeror's Cost /Price Volume shall contain a table of contents outlining all of the documents (by document file name) comprising the Offeror's Cost/Price Volume. The table of contents shall identify all of the Offeror's Cost/Pricing proposal documents as well as all major subcontractors proposal documents. If a Subcontractor is submitting a Cost/Price proposal directly to the Government, then that Subcontractor shall also submit a table of contents outlining all of the documents (by document file name) comprising the

Subcontractor's Cost/Price Volume.

L.3.4.2(b) The Offeror shall provide an overall Cost/Price Matrix, which summarizes each Task Order 0001 through 0005, including all unique options, and the overall proposed Cost/Price for the contract. The Offeror shall complete Attachment 0008 - Cost/Price Matrix for each Task Order 0001 through 0005 by populating the highlighted blue cells. All un-highlighted cells are formula driven. Offerors shall not unlock/unprotect the Attachment 0008 Cost/Price Matrix. CLIN structure is as shown in Attachment 0008 and shall be proposed as

CPFF. Cost and fee shall be differentiated for each CLIN and rolled up into a table as shown in Attachment 0008.

L.3.4.2(c) Offerors shall provide details of the proposed Cost/Price for all Task Orders, CLINs, and shall provide supporting documentation for all costs. The Cost/Price Volume shall be submitted in Adobe Acrobat or Microsoft (MS) Office compatible format. All proposals shall be stated in U.S. dollars and rounded to two decimal places. Where formulas exist in the Cost/Price Proposal, they shall show working formulas. The Offeror's Cost/Price Proposal shall summarize totals for all ordering periods. Proposals may contain macros if the calculations are visible and contained in the MS Excel spreadsheet. A macro is a series of commands and instructions that are grouped together as a single command to accomplish a task automatically. However, a narrative in MS Word format must be included that provides instructions for operating the macro.

L.3.4.3 The Offeror shall provide all cost/pricing assumptions and associated rationale in a narrative format. If a Subcontractor is submitting a cost proposal, then that Subcontractor shall also provide all of its cost/pricing assumptions and associated rationale in a narrative format. The Offeror shall provide a narrative to explain the flow of data to a summary from the detailed calculations within the electronic proposal. Explanations should address the mechanics of the detailed calculations, (i.e. pivot tables, lookup tables, and cell name definitions). The Contractor shall provide a basis of estimate for all costs. Any assumption that alters or supplants terms or conditions contained in this solicitation or, as amended, will result in the Offerors proposal being rejected and the Offeror being removed from award consideration.

L.3.4.4 Failure to propose Cost/Prices for all CLINs may result in the Offeror being ineligible for award.

L.3.4.5 Offerors shall state and explain all pricing assumptions and rationale. In addition, Offerors may provide any written explanations or documentation (in addition to the required explanations and documentation above), as deemed necessary, in order to enable the Government to understand the basis for the Cost/Prices that might otherwise seem unreasonable or incomplete. Offerors are cautioned against placing conditions or qualifications upon their Cost/Price proposals that are contrary to, or otherwise attempt to amend, the requirements of the solicitation; doing so may result in an offer being deemed unacceptable for further consideration.

L.3.4.6 Offerors shall provide the POC name and local DCAA and DCMA office address for the prime Offeror and all major subcontractors within the Cost Proposal.

8 12

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.3.4.7 Compliance: With respect to pricing, the proposal is presumed to represent the Offeror's best effort in responding to the solicitation. Any significant inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between promised performance and Cost/Price shall be explained by the Offeror in its proposal. For example, if the use of new and innovative techniques is intended, the impact on cost shall be explained. For example, if a business policy decision to absorb a portion of the estimated cost was made, that approach shall be stated within the proposal (including any associated calculations). Consistency between the Offeror's Cost/Price and Technical Proposals reflects the Offeror's ability to perform the effort required at the proposed amount. Any significant inconsistencies, if unexplained, raise a fundamental question as to the Offeror's inherent understanding of the work required and its ability to perform the contract.

The burden of proof as to the cost credibility rests with the Offeror.

L.3.4.8 Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data: The Government anticipates receiving competitive proposals and using competition to determine price reasonableness. However, the Government reserves the right to request data other than certified cost or pricing data and/or subcontract prices after receipt of proposals. If required, data other than certified cost or pricing data must be submitted IAW the instructions specified at FAR 15.403-5, Instructions for Submission of Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified

Cost or Pricing Data.

L.3.4.9 The Offeror and its proposed Subcontractors, with proposal values exceeding $2,000,000 for the total five (5) ordering periods of potential performance that were selected on a non-competitive basis, shall provide detailed cost element proposals by CLIN submitted electronically in Microsoft Excel format, with working formulas - prepared IAW FAR 15.408 Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses

Table 15-2, Instructions for Submitting Cost/Price Proposals when Certified Cost or Pricing Data is required. The Cost/Price Proposal shall be supported with verifiable facts, figures, and basis of estimates IAW instructions at FAR 15-2. The Cost/Price Proposal shall contain working formulas/algorithms and shall calculate proposed costs.

L.3.5 Offerors shall propose cost and fee for the CLINs under a CPFF contract structure. If a Subcontractor is submitting a Cost/Price

Proposal, then that Subcontractor shall also provide the information as stated in the paragraphs below to following L.2.1 instructions.

The requested data is required for the Government to perform the mandatory cost realism analysis of proposed direct and indirect expenses.

L.3.6 Offerors shall provide a full cost breakdown of the proposed prices. The proposal shall breakdown the labor cost by CLIN and by position. The labor breakdown shall include the following for each position: headcount (full-time equivalents), available hours, productive hours, scheduled overtime hours, base labor rate, overtime labor rate, cost of living adjustment if applicable, post differential if applicable, end of service benefit, fringe benefits, other direct costs and overhead, general and administrative (G&A) cost, and profit. If the Offeror includes other elements of compensation (e.g.,premiums for swing, night and other shifts, retention pay, etc.) not included in the list above, those elements must be included (individually, if more than one additional element) in the labor breakdown, by position.

L.3.6.1 The Offeror shall provide the rate data as stated in the paragraphs below. If a Subcontractor is submitting a Cost/Price

Proposal, then that Subcontractor shall also provide the rate data as stated in the paragraphs below. The requested data is required for the Government to perform the mandatory cost realism analysis of proposed direct and indirect expenses.

L.3.6.1(a) Compliance with the Service Contract Act (SCA) Attachment 0009 Maryland Wage Determination Counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Baltimore City, Carroll, Harford, & Howard is required. For evaluation and proposal submission purposes only, Offerors should assume a 24 September 2020 Notice to Proceed date. Offerors (including Subcontractors) shall use the SCA rates included with the solicitation Attachment 0009 and shall not include any escalation for the entire period of performance of each individual task order.

L.3.6.1(b) The Offeror's proposal (including proposal submissions from Subcontractors shall include supporting data for Direct Labor costs for personnel not covered by the SCA (i.e., exempt positions). The supporting payroll documentation should consist of current and/or historical payroll records provided as screen shots from the payroll system, copies of payroll reports, and/or copies of paystubs with a narrative explanation of why each payroll title was selected, how that payroll information was used to determine the proposed labor rates, and accompanying calculations to show how the supporting payroll data was used to calculate the proposed labor rates for each applicable labor category. The provided documentation should be redacted to ensure no Personally Identifiable Information (PII) is included in the submission. EXAMPLE: The proposed rate for a Supply Manager is based on the median salary for a Warehouse Manager

(selected wage survey title) with five years of service; annual rate $xx,xxx divided by 2080 = $xx.xx per hour. The Warehouse Manager title was selected from the utilized wage survey as the duties and qualifications for that position are considered most similar to the duties as required by the PWS.

L.3.6.1(c) For proposal preparation purposes only, for each of the ordering periods, the Offeror SHALL escalate its proposed Exempt Base

Labor Rates, compounded annually, utilizing the following percentage: 3.00% for each ordering period. If the Offeror proposes escalation of exempt rates utilizing different percentages than these provided, or proposes no escalation of exempt rates, the Offeror's exempt rates will be normalized (adjusted) by the Government consistent with the percentages provided above.

L.3.7 In addition to the labor breakdown, Offerors shall provide an explanation of all labor elements, as follows:

L.3.7.1 Available Hours: Offerors shall explain how available hours are calculated to include standard workweeks, anticipated shifts, hours of operations (when applicable), etc.

9 12

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.3.7.1(a) Productive Hours: Offerors shall explain how available hours are divided between productive hours and nonproductive hours.

Nonproductive hours shall be broken out by element and may include vacation time, holidays, sick leave, and other personal leave.

Offerors must also explain how the nonproductive hours will be accumulated and charged (direct or indirect).

L.3.7.1(b) Overtime Hours: Offerors shall explain how overtime hours are calculated to include anticipated shifts, coverage required for specific operations, holidays, etc.

L.3.7.1(c) Base Labor Rate: Offerors shall specify the base labor rate for each position. Offerors shall explain the basis for the base labor rates and provide relevant documentation (payroll records, wage surveys, market research, etc.) to…