W52P1J16R0060-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0001 2017APR05

W52P1J

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - RI

ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-8000

BLDGS 60 & 62

BRIDGET L. KRAMER

EMAIL: BRIDGET.L.KRAMER.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W52P1J-16-R-0060

2017MAR08

X

X 2017APR24 10:00am

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 6

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: BRIDGET L. KRAMER

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCRC-AC/(309)782-0896

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

The purpose of this Amendment 0001 to solicitation W52P1J-16-R-0060 is to complete the following:

1. Provide answers to the following questions that have been received:

a. Question 1. Regarding the packaging on the 60MM M27 Fin, it states we can use 9287837-1, 9287837-1, or 9287837-3 for the tray to package the fins. The 9287835 print provided in the TDP does not have options for 1, 2, or 3.

Response 1. After further review the U.S. Government determined the most recent revision for the packaging of the M27 was not included in the TDP and a page was missing. Therefore, drawing 9287837 Revision K will be uploaded to FBO, which shall include all three options for packaging.

b. Question 2. Do you have any historical pricing on the fins or a target price range?

Response 2. Based on available historical pricing, the U.S. Government has paid less than $20 each for the M24 and M28 and less than $12 each for the M27.

c. Question 3. Does the offeror need to provide General Quality System and Management Plan sub-factors under Option II submissions for each configuration?

Response 3. Yes, if Option II is used for any of the configurations all sub-factors (to include Quality System and Management

System) are required to be submitted.

d. Question 4. It appears that an oral presentation is required for any CLIN that involves an Option II response. Please confirm.

Response 4. Yes, oral presentations are required for Option II proposals.

e. Question 5. Can I submit Past Performance information from a commercial customer?

Response 5. At this time the U.S. Government is only accepting contract references for recent and relevant performance under

U.S. Army, United States Marine Corp and FMS or other Military contracts. Therefore, commercial contracts are not acceptable references.

f. Question 6. Does the reference to 30,000 per month which can consist of any combination of configurations mean the supplier must be able to meet 30,000/month throughput for each assembly (M24, M27 and M28) or when it says can consist of any combination of configurations does it mean a total of 30,000 per month regardless of the quantity of each assembly?

Response 6. The U.S. Government will not expect more than a total of 30,000 fins to be delivered in a months' time which could consist of a combination of all configurations.

g. Question 7. Requesting an extension to 24 April 2017.

Response 7. The U.S. Government has extended the closing date of this RFP to 24 April 2017 at 10:00AM Central Time.

h. Question 8a. It is understood that every offeror submitting a compliant proposal will be invited to give an oral presentation. Is this the intent, or are oral presentations only provided to those offerors that were down selected or placed in the competitive range?

Response 8a. All offerors who submit a complaint proposal utilizing Option II for the technical portion will be required to complete an oral presentation.

i. Question 8b. The solicitation states two non-presenters may be present in the room during oral presentations. Can an offeror have two presenters and two non-presenters in the room?

2 6

W52P1J-16-R-0060 0001

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Response 8b. The U.S. Government is not limiting the number of presenters only the amount of non-presenters. Therefore, each offeror can have as many presenters as they see fit.

j. Question 8c. Can the offeror use different presenters for different sub-factors?

Response 8c. Yes, the U.S. Government encourages the Subject Matter Experts for each factor present their portion.

k. Question 8d. Can the offeror provide a substitute presenter in lieu of the presenter identified on the power point slide?

Response 8d. The U.S. Government would prefer the presenter be the person identified on the slides, however, we understand that changes are sometimes unavoidable and will allow necessary adjustments.

l. Question 9. On drawing 11726683, Note 10 does not clearly identify the material alloy that is required. Can the specific alloy be provided?

Response 9. As per the drawing, the material requirement is: Aluminum Alloy, Spec ASTM B221, Hollow extrusions not permitted.

Yield - 35,000psi (0.2% offset), Elongation 8%. This subcomponent is not limited to a single alloy.

m. Question 10. As stated in MIL-DTL-48425B (M24 Specifications), Section 4.4.2.6 (Fin Assembly Table) references 100% conformance criteria for the blade security test. However, section 4.5.2 (Blade Security Test) states as follows, Units selected for this test shall be held in a fixture which does not damage the surface of the housing. Is the blade security test performed on 100% of all fin blades or a sampling?

Response 10. MIL-DTL-48425 paragraph 4.4.2.6 "Conformance Criteria" for Critical 2 Blade security test is listed as 100%.

n. Question 11a. In accordance with note 11 of the M24 Housing Specification, DWG 11726795, the surface finish requires that the front thread and cavity be masked. As an alternative surface finish, the entire surface is permissible provided that the process is approved by the technical agency. Will the government provide the requirements and process for offerors to obtain approval for the alternative surface finish (full coverage)?

Response 11a. If an offeror wishes to propose an alternative surface finish, the parts will be required to be submitted to the

U.S. Government for evaluation and approval. As such, this cannot be accomplished until after a contract award has been made.

Therefore, proposals shall be submitted to requirements of the current TDP.

o. Question 11b. So that offerors may account for this cost, is approval for the alternative surface finish obtained prior to proposal submission or after award?

Response 11b. Approval of an alternative surface finish would not be granted until after contract award. As this is a firm fixed priced contract, offerors shall account for all cost in its proposal. As stated in response 5a, proposals shall be submitted to the requirements of the current TDP.

p. Question 11c. Is the salt spray test required for the initial surface finish (thread and cavity are masked) or just for the alternative surface finish (full coverage)?

Response 11c. Salt spray test is required regardless of surface finish coverage.

q. Question 12a. In accordance with note 9 of the M28 Housing, Cartridge, DWG 9327833, the surface finish requires that the front thread and cavity be masked. As an alternative surface finish, the entire surface is permissible provided that the process is approved by the technical agency. Will the government provide the requirements for offerors to obtain approval for the alternative surface finish (full coverage)?

Response 12a. If an offeror wishes to propose an alternative surface finish, the parts will be required to be submitted to the

U.S. Government for evaluation and approval. As such, this cannot be accomplished until after contract award has been made.

Therefore, proposals shall be submitted to the requirements of the current TDP.

r. Question 12b. So that offerors may account for this cost, is approval for the alternative surface finish obtained prior to proposal submission or after award?

Response 12b. Approval of an alternative surface finish would not be granted until after contract award. As this is a firm fixed priced contract, offerors shall account for all cost in its proposal. As stated in response 6a, proposals shall be submitted to the requirements of the current TDP.

s. Question 13. Are offerors permitted to obtain raw materials from international providers or is this limited to U.S. based material vendors and subcontractors?

3 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Response 13. All raw materials shall be supplied in accordance with clause 252.225-7001 which has been added to this solicitation.

t. Question 14. Are offerors able to use .pdf file format for the presentation slides (meaning each slide would be a .pdf slide) in lieu of power point?

Response 14. Yes, presentation slides can be submitted in .PDF format.

u. Question 15. On page 65, L.3.1.a.ii. it states each IMS and each Process Flow Diagram must be submitted in separate files from Volume 1 sections, which are limited to 11" x 17. Are these also limited to 1 page each or can we use more than 1 page for these submissions?

Response 15. Each offeror is limited to five pages for each IMS and five pages for each Process Flow Diagram.

v. Question 16. The solicitation is FOB Destination, with possible shipments going to Quebec Canada. Should we assume all costs and responsibility for Department of State DSP 5 export licenses and a Canadian clearing house for these shipment? Or is the fact that this is on a U.S. Army contract streamline that process?

Response 16. Yes, the offeror will be responsible for all cost and obtaining all necessary documentation in order to ship items to all locations, including Quebec Canada.

2. Include NOR 4 of R16J2025 for the M24 that was inadvertently left out of the initial upload of the TDP.

3. Section C Requirements for the M24 has been revised and will be uploaded to FBO.

4. Revise clause 52.211-4508 to include the packaging information for M27.

5. Clause 252.225-7001, Buy American and Balance of Payments Program -- Basic, has been added to this solicitation.

6. The closing date for solicitation W52P1J-16-R-0060 has been extended from 3:00PM CST 10 April 2017 to 10:00AM CST on 24 April 2017.

7. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0002 ***

4 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION D - PACKAGING AND MARKING

Status Regulatory Cite Title Date Status Regulatory Cite Title Date _______ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________ _______ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________

D-1 CHANGED 52.211-4508 PACKAGING REQUIREMENTS JUL/1997

(ACC-RI)

CLIN 0001 M24 and CLIN 0003 M28:__________________________________

(a) Packaging shall be in accordance with 9268007 revision E, dated 12 May 2009.

(b) When lot numbering is required, no more than one lot shall be packaged in an outer shipping container.

(c) Marking shall be in accordance with 8799112, Revision AD, dated 20 March 2013. 2-D Barcodes are required In accordance with

12999545, Rev H, dated 02 April 2015

EXCEPTION: The following shall apply to drawing 9268007, revision E, dated 12 May 2009: DI-PACK-81059 is not required for this contract.

CLIN 0002 M27:_______________

(a) Packaging shall be in accordance with 9287835 revision H, dated 13 May 2014.

(b) When lot numbering is required, no more than one lot shall be packaged in an outer shipping container.

(c) Marking shall be in accordance with 8799112, Revision AD, dated 20 March 2013. 2-D Barcodes are required In accordance with

12999545, Rev H, dated 02 April 2015

EXCEPTION: The following shall apply to drawing 9287835, revision H, dated 13 May 2014: DI-PACK-81059 is not required for this contract.

(End of clause)

(DS6303)

5 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

Status Regulatory Cite Title Date Status Regulatory Cite Title Date _______ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________ _______ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ____________

I-1 ADDED 252.225-7001 BUY AMERICAN AND BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM--BASIC DEC/2016

6 6