ATTACHMENT_0007_-_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Survey.docx

Past Performance Evaluation Survey Family of Sheet Explosives Solicitation W52P1J-14-R-0115

The Army Contracting Command, Rock Island, is currently evaluating a best value procurement which includes past performance relating to the area of timeliness of deliveries and quality. You have been identified as a point of contact for contracts/purchase orders for the below identified items. Recent is defined as having occurred within 3 years prior to solicitation W52P1J-14-R-0115’s initial closing date of 18 December 2015 and up to the date of award. Relevant is defined as having previously produced like or similar items involving similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities. Like or similar items are defined as items that have been produced using similar manufacturing processes, essential skills and unique techniques required to produce the Family of Sheet Explosives. A like item shall also have performed under similar performance parameters, military or industry specifications and environmental conditions as the Family of Sheet Explosives.

Request that you taking a few moments to provide delivery information on the contract /purchase order you have been identified as POC. Your time and effort is greatly appreciated. Please submit the completed survey to the POC listed below. If you have any questions with regard to this request, please contact Ms. Stephanie Migawa at 309-782-3273 or email stephanie.m.migawa.civ@mail.mil and Ms. Danielle Walters at 309-782-4958 or email danielle.m.walters3.civ@mail.mil.

I appreciate your timely response.

Survey is being completed for offeror:

Name of Company/Government Agency completing Survey:

Contract/Purchase Order Number:

Name, title, and phone number of person completing Survey:

Length of time your firm/agency has been involved with the offeror:

PLEASE SUBMIT PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY BY: 18 December 2015, to Stephanie Migawa, stephanie.m.migawa.civ@mail.mil AND Danielle Walters, danielle.m.walters3.civ@mail.mil.

b. If contractor, why?

No

c. How many times was the delivery schedule revised due to contractor delay?

d. If yes, was the contractor ahead of schedule?

2. How would you rate this contractor’s past performance regarding meeting contract delivery schedule and why?

3. Throughout the course of your contract:

a. Did the contractor submit Requests for Deviation (RFDs) and/or Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs)? How would you rate the timeliness and quality of these submissions?

b. Did the contractor have any First Article Test (FAT) or Lot Acceptance Test (LAT) failures?

Please specify

c. Was the contract terminated for any reason? Please specify

4. Throughout the course of your contract, did the contractor have any critical characteristic failures? If so, how would you rate the timeliness and quality of Failure Analysis Corrective Action Reports (FACARs)?

a. How many critical characteristic failures did the Contractor have?

b. Did the Critical Failures cause a major delay in schedule, if so how many times?

5. How would you rate the overall quality of the contractor? Please circle one: Outstanding Good Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable

6. How would you rate the contractor’s responsiveness to requests for information? Please circle one and provide a brief explanation:

Outstanding Good Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable

7. How would you rate the contractor/customer relationship for this contract? Please circle one and provide a brief explanation:

Outstanding Good Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable

8. Any other comments regarding Quality, Delivery Schedule Performance/On-Time Delivery or about the contractor’s past performance in general?

Signature of person submitting Survey Date image1.png