Attachment Q- Technical Questions and Answers .xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Full Food Services, Fort McCoy, WI
- Solicitation number
- W5168W-24-R-0004
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army
About this file
This solicitation is for full food services at Fort McCoy, Wisconsin. The Department of the Army is seeking dining facilities management, food preparation and serving, housekeeping, and quality control services across four buildings with a total square footage of over 80,000. The period of performance is five consecutive 12-month task orders from January 2024 to December 2028. Pricing will be on a firm-fixed-price basis using the schedule and staffing matrix in Attachments G, H and the pricing matrix. Subsistence is government-furnished. The incumbent contractor is DCT Incorporated. Proposals are due by December 6, 2023 with past performance questionnaires extended to that date. The award will prioritize offers from the State of Wisconsin's list of qualified nonprofit agencies for the blind or severely disabled.
View the file
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q and A
| Number | Responsible | Question | Response | Posted with Amendment # |
| 1 | IRC | Please provide a copy, or an online link to the 7th November virtual presentation. | A copy of the virtual presentation will be provded as an attachement to SAM.gov. | 1 |
| 2 | IRC | Please provide a list of attendees for the 7th November virtual pre bid conference. | The list of attendees are as follows: KCA Corporation, DCT Incorporated, ECI Management, Southern Premier , Food Services Inc of Gainesville ,WI BEP, Taylored Treats and Acorn Services. Please refer to list of attendees posted as an attachement. | |
| 3 | IRC | Who is the current contractor? | The current contractor is DCT, Incorporated. Cage Code 04WD6 | |
| 4 | ASC | What was the total amount of Task orders paid to the contractor for fiscal 23 (1 October 2022 thru Sept 30, 2023)? | The government will not be providing this information. The current solicitation has evolved from current and previous contracts, and this information may be more damaging than helpful. If, however, the offeror still feels they want this information, there are public domains in which they can retrieve it, for example, the Federal Procurement Database System Link: https://www.fpds.gov/fpdsng_cms/index.php/en | |
| 5 | ASC | Attachment B – Head Counts – Please provide historical head counts by Month and we are requesting the head counts to include the time period of Oct 1, 2022, thru Sept 30, 2023. | October 2022-DFAC 1362-17,619 meals; November 2022-DFAC 1362-10,161 meals; December 2022-DFAC 1362-879 meals; January 2023-DFAC 1362-13,601 meals; February 2023-DFAC 1362-16,999 meals; March 2023-DFAC 1362-23,213 meals; April 2023-DFAC 1362-13,776 meals-DFAC 50-6,132 meals; May 2023-DFAC 1362-29,056 meals; June 2023-DFAC 50-24,763 meals; July 2023-DFAC 50-14,020 meals, DFAC 1672-11,982 meals; August 2023-DFAC 50-24,032 meals, DFAC 1672-31,917 meals; September 2023-DFAC 50-20,510 meals. | |
| 6 | ASC | Are Remote Feeding counts included in Attachment B? | Yes. | |
| 7 | ASC | 1.4.3.5 Supervisory Personal – Each shift leader shall supervise Contractor employees in no more than one dining facility per shift. Requesting Clarification – This statement refers to one dining room. Is it per dining room, or DFAC per shift? | The contractor shall have supervisory personnel in each operating dining facilty at all times to supervise contractor employees. If the contractor is operating two dining facilities, one supervisor cannot supervise contractor employees in both dining facilities at the same time. | |
| 8 | IRC | Attachment I – CBA; we downloaded the document, and it contains wage and benefit rate information that started 1 January 2022. We are requesting current compensation information; we need a copy of the wage and benefit rate information which started 1 January 2023. | The current CBA was uploaded to SAM.gov on 11/13/2023. | |
| 9 | IRC | Please provide the Current Contract number and the annual dollar value of the current contract. | The government will not be providing any dollar value information. The current solicitation has evolved from current and previous contracts, and this information may be more damaging than helpful. If, however, the offeror still feels they want this information, there are public domains in which they can retrieve it, for example, the Federal Procurement Database System Link: https://www.fpds.gov/fpdsng_cms/index.php/enHowever, the current contract number is W9124J-19-D-0005 | |
| 10 | ASC | Please provide a copy of recent food service inspections. Are inspections performed monthly? Who performs these inspections? | The Government inspects all services required in the PWS Performance Requirements Summary, paragraph 5 according to the American National Standard Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes (ANSI/ASQCZ1.4). The number of inspections each month is based upon the number of dining facilities and the number of days open. See attached inspections. | 1 |
| 11 | ASC | Please describe the recycling duties for the contractor. | The contractor shall separate the disposables by type (garbage, cardboard, paper, glass) and put them into separate dumpsters located outside of each dining facility. Fort McCoy uses one recycling dumpster in which recycleables are co-mingeled. The contractor shall use food dehydrators and pulpers for food waste when provided in the dining facility. | |
| 12 | ASC | Who arranges for and pays for any needed kitchen equipment repair and, or serving utensil replacement? | The Contractor has maintenance responsibilities of Government Furnished Property as stated in paragraph 2.6 of the PWS. If the maintenance is beyond the scope of paragraph 2.6 of the PWS, the Contractor will notify the Fort McCoy Department of Public Works according to procedures in the answer of question 0038 below. Service/Work Orders are paid by the Goverment. The replacement of serving utensils is according to paragraph 2.4 of the PWS and Attachment D(3)-Durable Property. | |
| 13 | ASC | Who arranges for and pays for exterminating services? | The Government provides exterminating services at each dining facility and in the project management office. The Government pays for this service. | |
| 14 | ASC | Who arranges for and pays for regular cleaning of any exhaust hoods, and grease traps? | The Government arranges and pays for exhaust hood cleaning (beyond the removable filters) and grease traps. The contractor shall clean the outside and inside of the hood itself as well as the removeable filters. | |
| 15 | ASC | Will the government provide free telephone and Wi-Fi services for the contractor? | The Government provides one Fort McCoy telephone for each dining facility and the project mangement office. The Government does not provide for free telephone and Wi-Fi services for the contractor's use. | |
| 16 | ASC | Will you provide any office space for the contractor’s Project Manager? Will you provide a desk, or any office furniture for the food service manager to use? | The Government provides the contractor with a contract project management office which is currently building 1601. Within this building there is a project manager office which has a modular office desk and chair. | |
| 17 | IRC | Was the current contract a competitive award? | Yes | |
| 18 | IRC | Are there any major subcontractors? If so, who are they? | No | |
| 19 | IRC | What is the annual (invoice) amount? | The government will not be providing any dollar value information. The current solicitation has evolved from current and previous contracts, and this information may be more damaging than helpful. If, however, the offeror still feels they want this information, there are public domains in which they can retrieve it, for example, the Federal Procurement Database System Link: https://www.fpds.gov/fpdsng_cms/index.php/en | |
| 20 | ASC | Were headcount ranges used in the current contract? If so, what were they? | Yes. The currrent contract uses the same headcount ranges listed in Attachments G and H. | |
| 21 | ASC | Could the Government provide current historical headcount for FY 2023? | See Answer to Question 0005. | |
| 22 | ASC | Is there an approved master menu or cyclic menu (i.e., 31-day menu) that must be used? | Yes. Fort McCoy has a 31-day cyclic master menu that is maintained in the Army Food Management Information System (AFMIS) by the Government that must be used in each operational dining facility. | |
| 23 | ASC | Is Go for Green standards to be used? | Yes, all dining facilities shall use the Army's Go For Green Standards. | |
| 24 | IRC | Could the Government confirm the POP (period of performance) dates? Proposals are due on 6 December 2023 and POP is listed as 1 December Phase-In and 1 Jan 2024 start date. | The POP will be adjusted to the actual award date. | |
| 25 | IRC | Could the Government clarify the date when Past Performance Questionnaires are due by? The letter the Government provides states November 14, 2023, however proposals are due by December 6, 2023. | Past Performance Questionnaires due date will be extended to proposal due date; December 6, 2023. | |
| 26 | ASC | The Tri-Service Food Code at paragraph 8-201.13 establishes when HACCP plans are required. DA PAM 30-22 at paragraph 3-8 establishes installation food protection programs. Are there any installation food protection programs in use at Fort McCoy? | Fort McCoy follows the requirements of paragraph 3-8 in DA PAM 30-22 in all dining facility operations. | |
| 27 | IRC | Will the total number of months in the ordering period(s) be sixty consecutive months (page(s) 105/106 of 108)? | There will be five consecutive 12-month task orders which equals a 60 month ordering period. | |
| 28 | ASC | The Pricing Matrix at ordering period year 4 CLINS 0006 lists building as XXXX. Should this read building 2674? | Yes. On ordering period 4 CLIN 0006 should be listed as building 2674. | |
| 29 | IRC | Are the quantities in the Schedule B estimated? CLINS 0002 through 0006 have a quantity of 12 and the Pricing Matrix quantity for year one is listed as 11. Could the Government clarify which quantity is to be used? | The base period, CLIN 0002- CLIN 0006 is 12 months. The 30-day phase-in period, CLIN 0001, in the base year is listed separately. | |
| 30 | IRC | Is clause 52.222-55 Minimum Wage for Contractor Worker under E. O. 14026 applicable to this contract? It does not appear to be selected or posted? | Yes, see page 64 of solicitation. | |
| 31 | ASC | In Attachment F, it appears that building square footage may not be consistent. For example, building 50 is either 10,851 or 20,772 square feet. Could the Government confirm the square footage for all four buildings? | The square footages of each dining facility is as follows based on the Fort McCoy Department of Public Works: DFAC 50-20,772, DFAC 1362-12,500, DFAC 1672-20,786, DFAC 2674-17,439. The sum of the Interior/Exterior Dining Facility Areas as listed in Attachment F does not equal the total square foot of the dining facility. The total square footage also includes utility/mechanical rooms as well. | |
| 32 | ASC | Attachment F, does Building 2674 have 4 regular menu lines and the remaining three buildings only have 2 regular lines? | As briefed in the virtual site visit and in Attachment F, DFAC 50 and 1362 have two hot serving lines and DFACs 1672 and 2674 have four hot serving lines. In DFACs 1362, 1672 and 2674 two hot lines are co-located togther in order to feed more personnel faster. | |
| 33 | ASC | Attachment F, could the Government confirm that there are only 2 headcount stations in each building? | Yes. There are only two headcount stations in each dining facility. | |
| 34 | ASC | Does the Government require all lines and headcount stations be manned regardless of headcount range | No. The Contractor shall perform headcount/cashier duties for each meal to maintain a flow rate of guests corresponding with serving line flow rates as required in Paragraph 4.4.3.1 of the PWS. Based on past feeding; the Contractor should man two headcount stations when feeding over 100 in dining facility 1362 and man two headcount stations in dining facilities 50, 1672 and 2674 when feeding over 200. | |
| 35 | ASC | Does the Government envision any large scale, multi-component annual training exercises or mobilization training during the life of the contract? | The Government cannot predict future feeding missions for large scale, multi-component annual training exercises or mobilization for the life of the contract. | |
| 36 | ASC | Does the Government desire discussion in the Technical Volume (3. b. (1), page 95 of 108) to substantiate the validity of staffing? Where in the technical volume does the Government require staffing rationale/methodology discussion? | Yes, as much substantiation for staffing is desirable. Many offerors state rationale for topics such as cross utilization underneath the bands at the bottom of the spreadsheet. However, the rationale can be anywhere within the proposal either within the staffing spreadsheet or the Volume II Technical. | |
| 37 | ASC | The PWS at paragraph 1.4.10 outlines extensive Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Training Plan that involves the SAPR program DoDD 6495.01 and resources to victims that include Special Victims Counsel (SVC/Victim’s Legal Counsel (VLC), a Sexual Assault Coordinator (SARC) and healthcare services that are only available to the military and their DoD components, DoD civilian employees. According to DoDD 6495.01 it is only available to DoD contractors when, “U.S. citizen DoD contractor personnel when they are authorized to accompany the Armed Forces in a contingency operation OCONUS and their U.S. citizen employees (See DoDI 3020.41 (Reference (d))). Refer to Volume 1 of Reference (c) for reporting options available to DoD contractors.” The contractor has federal government compliance and enforcement rules under the jurisdiction of the EEOC and office of Federal Contract Compliance. Could the government make changes to the PWS paragraph 1.4.10 so that it complies with what the civilian contractor has available to their employees and is required from the Government? | Please see attached revised PWS | 1 |
| 38 | ASC | PWS at paragraph 2.6 requires compliance with the installation work-order procedures. Could the government provide those procedures? | Current Government work/service order procedures are to submit work orders by telephone or through a website that the Government will provide. Both methods go to the Fort McCoy Department of Public Works. | |
| 39 | ASC | PWS at paragraph 2.10 establishes that storage space is provided in building 490. Is this a correct reading of Government provided facilities? | The Government will provide storage space for disposable take-out materials in building 490 according to paragraph 2.10. | |
| 40 | ASC | PWS at paragraph 4.4.3.1.1 establishes performance requirements for head counting services. The PWS establishes the standards, but also required compliance with other applicable regulatory guidelines. What are these guidelines? Are there any additional SOP’s that establish additional tasks for head counting performance (i.e., reporting headcount by unit)? | Headcounting service requirements can be found in AR & DA PAM 30-22 and two internal Fort McCoy SOPs: Headcount -Cashier SOP-I-036 and Unit Food Service Request-Headcount Projection SOP-I-038 (Attached). | |
| 41 | ASC | PWS at paragraph 6 establishes required reports. Are there any additional reports required by the Government? | The Fort McCoy Garrison also requires the number of contractor employees on staff each month and employee residental data on a annual basis. The Government COR will contact the Contractor Project Manager to request this information as needed. | |
| 42 | ASC | PWS at paragraph 1.4.1.1 establishes that the Staffing Matrix will be incorporated into the contract as Attachment H. How will compliance be determined under the PBSA strategy? | If found acceptable, the offeror's proposed staffing matrix will be incorporated into the contract. At this time, there are no set compliance measures specifically for maintaining staffing levels. However, offereors should keep in mind staffing that is deemed acceptable by the source selection evaluation board is agreed upon in theory to satisfactorily meet all PWS mission requirements. Any lower deviations from the agreed upon staffing are not recommended. By not bringing in as much staffing as originally proposed, the offeror risks not being able to meet all PWS and PRS items. | |
| 0043 | IRC | Can the Prime be a Non-R-SA Company with an SLA registered R-SA Company as a Sub-Contractor? | The SLA would not serve as a sub-contractor if the SLA received the award under the R-SA priority | |
| 0044 | IRC | If the Prime Contractor can be a Non-R-SA Company with an SLA registered RSA Company as a Sub-Contractor, is there a required work-share requirement that the R-SA Company needs to meet? | See Question 0043 as the response. | |
| 0045 | IRC | Is the SLA R-SA Company required to be registered in the state of Wisconsin, or can a certified SLA R-SA from other states fulfill this requirement? | The SLA is a state government entity and will select a vendor licensed pursuant to the SLA’s procedures. | |
| 0046 | IRC | Is it a requirement to have an R-SA Prime or Sub-Contractor on the contract to be awarded the opportunity? | No, the government will award competively with priority given to the SLA. Please refer to page 82 of the RFP. | |
| 0047 | IRC | Which takes precedence for award? Will the “Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable” (LPTA) win the award without an R-SA company or will the “R-SA” company take priority for award without being the LPTA? | Please refer to Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items; pages 89-90. | |
| 0048 | IRC | Can a contractor not have an R-SA company and still have a chance of being awarded the opportunity? | Yes | |
| 0049 | ASC | I understand that some of these questions are a bit redundant, I just wanted to be sure that I covered any misinterpretations, so we are 100% clear on the response from your office.Meal counts are for 2020, 2021, & 2022. The average count for 2020 & 2021 is over 300K. We understand this is during Covid, shutdowns, and DoD travel restrictions. However, the counts jump dramatically to over 1M in 2022. 2021-2022 also had Afghan refugees being fed at Fort McCoy. Do the 2022 numbers include Afghan refugees or are the 2022 numbers a more normal count when not a pandemic? | The headcount listed in Attachment B for dining facility 2674 is incorrect for fiscal years 2021 and 2022. In fiscal year 2021 dining facility 2674 fed 125,808 meals and in fiscal year 2022 dining facility 2674 fed zero (0) meals. Attachment B is also incorrect for dining facility 1362 for fiscal year 2022. In fiscal year 2022 dining facility 1362 fed 109,328 meals. The 2022 numbers include Afghan refugees in dining facility 2674 only. All the headcount for dining facility 2674 for 2022 is Afghan refugees. The 2022 numbers are a more normal count for dining facilites 50 and 1362 when not in a pandemic. | |
| 0050 | ASC | Does the Contractor pay and order the food through their own food vendor or is it ordered and paid through the Army with a personnel person provided through AFMIS system? | Subsistence is Government owned and provided to the Contractor through the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Subsistence Prime Vendor Program. The Contractor will use AFMIS to order the subsistence. The Army will pay for the food once it is received and receipted. | |
| 0051 | ASC | Do all menus have to be developed from AFMIS or can the vendor use already go-green menus developed by the vendor (submitted for approval)? | All menus have to be developed from AFMIS. The vendor can always provide menu suggestsion to the Government for consideration. | |
| 0052 | ASC | Attachment F: Notes that the headcount data in Attachment B is not representative of the forecasted days in each band for each building and that FY 20 / 21 / 22 were affected in some fashion by Covid 19 and a critical mission that utilized Buildings 1672 & 2674, that are not expected to repeat. Were the number of meals fed during the critical mission included in the existing contract and headcount data in Attachment B, or were they fed using a separate contract? | The number of meals fed during the critical mission were not included in the existing contract. The headcount data in attachment B for dining facility 2674 for FY2022 is all for the critical mission. The critcal mission was fed using a separate contract. | |
| 0053 | ASC | Attachment J: Building 1362, picture labeled Serving Line 1 & 2 shows a picture that includes 2 Griddles with tall sneeze guards / glass in front of the Griddles. Is the short order food to be prepared on the griddles and served by passing food directly over the glass sneeze guards? If not, how are the short order grill items served? | Yes. At breakfast eggs to order and during lunch and dinner if the menu calls for a short order item to be cooked off the grills the cook will hand it over the glass to the diner once the food item is cooked. | |
| 0054 | ASC | Will training for AT, iWATCH, OPSEC, TARP, etc. occur as part of the 40 hours of Week 1 phase in, or some other part of phase in or should contractor plan for staffing hours beyond phase in hours in order for staff to complete these trainings? | The Government has no preference when the contractor trains their personnel during phase in. In accordance with the PWS AT training shall be completed within 30 days after contract start date and annually thereafter; iWATCH trainng shall be completed within 30 days of contract award and within 5 days of new employees commencing performance; OPSEC training shall be completed with 30 days of thier reporting for duty and annually thereafter; TARP training shall be completed within 30 days of their reporting for duty and annually thereafter, etc. | |
| 0055 | ASC | QC Plan requires contractors to have QC personnel who can directly report to contractors’ top management. Are QC personnel “Key” personnel and can this role be covered by Contractor Management Personnel in addition to their other duties? | In the PWS paragraph 1.4.3 it lists the Key Personnel. For the purposes of QC personnel the Quality/Safety Manager is listed as Key in paragraph 1.4.3.3 and the Quality/Food Safety Training Manager is listed as Key in paragraph 1.4.3.4. Both positions are dedicated postions and thier roles may not be covered by other contractor personnel. | |
| 0056 | ASC | Does the government provide phone or internet in the DFAC Offices for Contractor PM & QC use to communicate to contractors Corporate Office? | The Government provides one Government phone in each dining facility office and one computer for AFMIS administration that is connected to the internet. | |
| 0057 | ASC | “Government owned” copiers were mentioned for each DFAC in the virtual walk-through. Will one be provided for the Project Management Office at Building 1601? | No. Government owned copiers are only provided in the dining facilities. | |
| 0058 | ASC | There are a few items in the Building Drawings marked with * denoting that the equipment is “Contractor Furnished and Installed, OMAR Funded”. Is that referencing a Construction Contractor? If not, are those items owned currently by the existing FFS Dining Contractor? | These items are referencing a contruction contractor, not the full food service contractor. | |
| 0059 | ASC | Who handles minor repairs to carts, pallet jacks, etc.? | Paragraph 2.6 Maintenance of GFP provides the responsibilities of the Contractor relating to minor repairs. If the repair is beyond the scope of this paragraph then the contractor will follow work/service order procedures. Current Government work/service order procedures are to submit work orders by telephone or through a website that the Government will provide. Both methods go to the Fort McCoy Department of Public Works. | |
| 0060 | ASC | Are there any vehicles furnished by the government for contractor use in the event of needing to transport food between buildings? | No. | |
| 0061 | ASC | As we started to prepare our proposal; we came across an area we are not clear on. Could this request for clarification be added to the question and answer phase? Attachment H states that Dining Facility Managers and Assistant Dining Facility Managers would be priced as part of the PMO and for the Staffing Matrix these positions should be included in the building SubCLINS. Building 1672 and 2674 have a unit of issue that amounts to 34 operational days in the first ordering period and 36 operational days in the second through the fifth ordering periods. This scenario cannot be accurately priced. If these facilities are open more than the listed quantities, we could not recover the cost. If the Government does not open these facilities, they would not be able to recover their cost. How does the Government intend for contractors to price these services? | See updated Attachment H. The Instructions tab (template was changed after this was issued) now reads “Please note that although Dining Facility Managers (and Assistant Dining Facility Managers) may be priced as part of PMO, for the Staffing Matrix, those positions should be included in the Bldg subCLINs.” It is up to the Offeror to price in PMO or in its daily unit prices for each Bldg. The note is intended to ensure that if the DFM/ADFM is priced in PMO, those positions must be shown in the staffing for the DFAC the DFM/ADFM will be working in. Additionally, a heading on the “Other Services” tab was corrected on row 51 to state “Dining Facility Opening and Closing:” instead of “Extended Services”. |
| 0062 | IRC | Is there an extension for the past performance questionnaires (currently Nov 14 2023) considering questions related to this solicitation were just due on Nov 13 and it was posted on Nov 1, 2023? | Yes, we will extend the Past Performance Questionnaries to the solicitation closing date; December 6, 2023. Please refer to attachment M posted on 11/21/23 |
| 0063 | IRC | is there a current incumbent for this contract? Does the government have a budget for this project? | The current contractor is DCT, Incorporated; Cage Code 04WD6. The government cannot provide a response on budgeting. |
| 0064 | ASC | Reference Attachment F Workload Capacity; Building 1672 and 2674 are open 2-3 months per year for annual training exercises. (1) Are each of these buildings opened simultaneously for annual training? (2) Could the Army specify which months of the year they are scheduled to be opened ? (3) Are any other DFAC s closed during the 2-3 months these buildings (1672 and 2674) are opened? | The opening and closing of buildings 1672 and 2674 depend upon the training missions given to Fort McCoy and world events. The months of the year that 1672 and 2674 would be operated are usually in the summer months if they are opened (May-August). Generally without a pandemic, DFAC 50 would be operating in the summer and one of the big DFACs (1672 or 2674) would be opened up for the special feeding mission as well. If there is no special feeding mission, then 1672 and 2674 would not be operated. |
| 0065 | ASC | Does the Army prefer a truck driver be assigned to each DFAC ? | |
| The Government has no preference that a truck driver be assigned to each DFAC. | |||
| 0066 | ASC | Does the Army provide vehicles for contractor staff ? | |
| No. | |||
| 0067 | ASC | Attachment H Staffing Matrix; The lines for Supervisory and Non-Supervisory personnel during operational hours do not have calculations. Are we to insert the number of Supervisory and Non-Supervisory staff without the calculations? | In each dining facility the supervisory and non-supervisory personnel should be input into columns B through AJ by labor category and quantity if the same labor category. The spreadsheet will calculate the total hours by labor category in column AK. Along the bottom on each meal CLIN the spreadsheet will also caculate the Total Per 1/2 Hour Increment as well as the Total Daily Hours. If your spreadsheet is not calculating these, please go back to the soliciation and download the Attachment H again. |
| 0068 | ASC | Please clarify the government will pick up and return the containers for remote feeding requirements. | For remote site feeding requirements, the unit that is requesting the food will pick up the food at the dining facility and then will return the containers to the dining facility after the meal has been served. There is no requirement for the contractor to deliver prepared food in containers. The Government stocks the empty containers at building 490. When the dining facility is given projected remote site feeding requirements, the contractor must pick up the containers to be used for the mission from building 490 and turn them back into building 490 when the containers are no longer needed. |
| 0069 | ASC | We noted on Attachment F Workload Capacity, that buildings 1362, 1672, and 2674 have no dish rooms listed. Perhaps this is a typo? Request the number of dish rooms be identified for each DFAC. | Attachment F for each of the four dining facilities lists square footage for the Dishwashing Area. Dining Facilities 50, 1362, 1672 and 2674 each have one dishwashing area. |
80NSSC23R0001 Amendment 00008 NTSS Final RFP Questions from Industry
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .