DiDs.pdf

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Production Status Report

DI-MGMT-81255, dated 02-Mar-1992, has been reviewed and determined to be valid for use in acquisition.

NOTICE OF

VALIDATION

DI-MGMT-81255

NOTICE 1

13-Apr-2017

NOTE: The activities above were interested in this document as of the date of this document. Since organizations and responsibilities can change, you should verify the currency of the information above using the ASSIST Online database at https://assist.dla.mil.

AMSC N/A AREA MGMT

Preparing Activity:

Army - MI

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-11-14T21:06Z Check the source to verify that this is the current version before use.

https://assist.dla.mil

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-11-14T21:07Z

Title: STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL (SPC) PLAN

Number: DI-MGMT-81987 Approval Date: 20150714

AMSC Number: N9564 Limitation:

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No

Preparing Activity: SH Project Number: MGMT-2015-009

Applicable Forms:

Use/relationship: The Statistical Process Control (SPC) plan defines management’s SPC responsibilities, involvement, and commitment to continuous process improvement. The plan describes the contractor’s policy for applying SPC and information regarding the implementation of SPC. This plan also provides detail for specific manufacturing processes and operations parameters under control.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirements as delineated in the contract.

Requirements:

1. Format. The plan shall be in the Contractor’s format.

2. Content. The plan shall include a cover sheet identifying:

a. Contractor preparing office.

b. Contractor’s title.

c. Contract Number.

d. Procurement Request Number, if applicable.

e. Revision and date.

f. Nomenclature of the system/component/program/project.

h. Government activity issuing the controlling contract.

2.1. The plan shall include all descriptive material, sketches, drawings, photographs, tables, forms, graphs, worksheets, charts, etc. needed to show clarity in the text.

2.2 The plan shall contain a table of contents.

2.3 The plan shall include an index.

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-11-14T21:11Z

Test/Inspection Report

DI-NDTI-80809B, dated 24-Jan-1997, has been reviewed and determined to be valid for use in acquisition.

NOTICE OF

VALIDATION

DI-NDTI-80809B

NOTICE 1

27-Aug-2014

NOTE: The activities above were interested in this document as of the date of this document. Since organizations and responsibilities can change, you should verify the currency of the information above using the ASSIST Online database at https://assist.dla.mil.

AMSC N/A AREA NDTI

Preparing Activity:

Air Force - 20

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-11-14T21:04Z https://assist.dla.mil

DI-QCIC-81960

Title: MEASUREMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION (MSE) – MEASUREMENT AND INSPECTION

EQUIPMENT SYSTEM DESIGN DOCUMENTATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRODUCT

Number: DI-QCIC-81960 Approval Date: 25 February 2014 ASMC Number: 9461 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: (AR) , RDAR-EIQ-SE Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: The Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design documentation for Acceptance of Product describes the Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE), Automated AIE (AAIE), and various measurement systems, used to meet the inspection and test requirements to deliver units and other end products that conform to contract, specification, QAP and drawing requirements. This documentation is used to evaluate the acceptability of these designs to meet contract requirements.

a. This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific requirement delineated in the contract.

b. This DID is applicable to all AIE as required by the contract.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents. The applicable documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in contract documentation.

2. Format. Contractor’s format is acceptable.

3. Content. An AIE package shall include the following (as applicable).

3.1 Cover Sheet. Cover sheet information includes the following:

a. Prime contractor name, address, and contact information.

b. Contract number.

c. Nomenclature of item(s) being produced under contract.

d. Applicable drawing(s), specifications and Quality Assurance Provisions (QAPs).

e. Date and revision of “New” or “Revised” documentation.

f. Sub-component or assembly (if applicable).

g. Subcontractor(s) name, address, and contact information (if applicable).

3.2 Measuring and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation. Measuring and inspection equipment system design documentation covers a variety of measurement systems and equipment used to evaluate acceptability of units to meet requirements. See ISO 9000 paragraph 3.8.2, Inspection and 3.10.4, Measuring Equipment.

3.3 Master List / Matrix. A detailed Master List or Matrix cross references each characteristic and its inspection requirement from the applicable drawings, specifications and QAPs with the proposed inspection methods and equipment. The Master List or Matrix information includes the following:

a. Drawing, specification or QAP number with revision and date of item being inspected.

b. Amendments, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), Notices of Revision (NORs), etc.

c. Specification or QAP paragraph number.

d. Drawing, specification, or QAP characteristic letter/number, description, and inspection requirement.

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-11-14T21:05Z

Title: ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSAL (ECP)

Number: DI-SESS-80639D Approval Date: 20150407

AMSC Number: N9521 Limitation: N/A

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-011

Applicable Forms: DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)

Use/relationship: An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) provides the documentation in which the engineering change is described and how the proposed change will be implemented.

a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraph 3.3.1 (1) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.

b. This DID may be used in conjunction with DI-SESS-80642, Notice of Revision (NOR). A requirement for

NORs should be contractually imposed in conjunction with this DID.

c. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80639C and DI-SESS-81880.

d. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400

Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970

(outside USA).

e. An electronic version of DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), is available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm.

1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.

2. Format. The ECP shall be in one of the following formats:

a. DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP),

b. The schema required by the Acquirer’s Integrated Digital Environment (IDE), or

c. The Supplier’s preferred format.

3. Content. The ECP shall contain all the information in DD Form 1692.

End of DI-SESS-80639D

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-11-14T20:59Z http://www.sae.org/ http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm

Title: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE (RFV)

Number: DI-SESS-80640D Approval Date: 20150407

AMSC Number: N9522 Limitation: N/A

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-012

Applicable Forms: DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV)

Use/relationship: A Request for Variance describes a proposed departure from (a non-conformance with) approved product definition information for a limited amount of time/specified effectivity or a product found to be nonconforming with product definition information after the product has been produced by the production process.

a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraphs 3.3.2 (1)-(6) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.

b. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80640C and DI-SESS-81883.

c. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970 (outside USA).

d. An electronic version of DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV), is available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.

2. Format. The RFV shall be in one of the following formats:

a. DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV),

b. The schema required by the Acquirer’s Integrated Data Environment (IDE), or

3. Content. The RFV shall contain all the information in DD Form 1694.

End of DI-SESS-80640D

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-11-14T21:01Z

Title: NOTICE OF REVISION (NOR)

Number: DI-SESS-80642D Approval Date: 20150407

AMSC Number: N9523 Limitation: N/A

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-013

Applicable Forms: DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR)

Use/relationship: A Notice of Revision (NOR) describes the proposed changes to a technical document being requested by an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP).

a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraph 3.3.4 (1)-(2) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.

b. This DID may be used in conjunction with DI-SESS-80639, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), and

DI-SESS-80643, Specification Change Notice (SCN).

c. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80642C and DI-SESS-81881.

d. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400

Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970

(outside USA).

e. An electronic version of DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR), is available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm.

1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.

2. Format. The NOR shall be in one of the following formats:

a. DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR),

b. The schema required by the Acquirer’s Integrated Digital Environment (IDE), or

3. Content. The NOR shall contain all the information in DD Form 1695.

End of DI-SESS-80642D

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-11-14T21:10Z

e. Inspection method with AIE identification with description, revision, and date.

f. Clearly indicate any revisions from previous submission(s).

3.4 Go-No Go/Functional Gages. Gage information includes the following:

a. Gage drawing number (design identification) with revision and date.

b. Drawings showing gage dimensions with tolerances.

c. Drawings showing gage material with surface finish and hardness of contacting gage elements.

d. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).

3.5 Standard Measurement Equipment (SME). SME information includes the following:

a. Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy.

b. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).

3.6 Special Inspection Equipment/Methods. It includes Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), Tool Control (TC), Non-Destructive Testing (NDT), Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE), Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. It also includes inspection equipment that is not commercially available along with the corresponding design drawings.

a. Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). CMM information includes the following per ASME

B89.4.10360.2-2008:

i. Establishment of the geometry (Datums) and inspection process of the desired characteristic by the CMM. Include the number and location of probe hits to establish geometry (Datums) and any axis necessary to adequately inspect the feature.

ii. Environmental conditions and limits which may influence measurements.

iii. Operating procedures including machine start/warm up cycles, probing system qualification, probe cleaning, and probe calibrations.

iv. Periodic reverification tests in accordance with the user's specification and manufacturer’s procedures including repeatability of point coordinates and length measurement and repeatability.

v. Interim checks between periodic reverifications.

vi. Procedure for checking the CMM immediately after a significant event which could impact CMM performance.

b. Tool Control (TC). Tool Control information includes the following:

i. Measurements of form tools (punches, dies, molds, etc.) and correlation data between tool dimension and component dimension.

ii. Inspection frequency and gages used to measure the form tooling.

iii. Process control parameters that affect the component dimension.

iv. Procedures for tool control inspection including out of tolerance tool control dimension procedures, corrective action plans, and segregation of product since last successful inspection.

c. Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). NDT information includes the following:

i. Written procedures for the qualification and certification of NDT personnel and the certification records for each inspector, as described in NAS410 (NAS Certification & Qualification of NDT Personnel), ANSI/ASNT-CP-189 (ASNT Standard for Qualification and Certification of NDT Personnel), or SNT-TC-1A (Recommended

Practice for Personnel Qualification and Certification in NDT), and additional procedures identified by the Government.

ii. Records for other certification standards shall identify the applicable standard and confirm the levels of qualification of individuals responsible for acceptance of product to be consistent with those defined in the standard.

iii. The design documentation, specific application techniques, and operating procedures in accordance with ASTM E 543 (Standard Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive Testing) and the applicable nationally recognized standard practice(s) specific to the NDT method(s) employed on the contract, such as ASTM E-1742 (Standard Practice for Radiographic Examination) and SAE-AMS- STD-2154 (Inspection, Ultrasonic, Wrought Metals, Process For).

iv. Documentation on application techniques shall identify the applicable standard(s) utilized.

d. Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE) & Complex Designs. For AIE designs that are complex in nature, (e.g., open set-up, computer controlled, numerically controlled, multistation, and acceptance inspection equipment which is part of an integrated production and assembly system) the following information is to be provided:

i. Concept designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 3, paragraph 3.2.1) includes:

(1) Sketches of the inspecting elements.

(2) Theory of operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams.

(3) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.

(4) Description of all fail-safe measures that lead to rejection of Unit Under Test

(UUT).

(5) A proposed test plan to qualify the accuracy of inspection and correctness of accept or reject decisions and resultant actions.

(6) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design.

(7) A method for verifying the integrity of the code (e.g., checksum or cyclic redundancy check).

ii. Detailed proposed designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 4, paragraph 3.2.2) include:

a. After concept approval and before any fabrication:

(1) Drawings of the inspecting elements.

(2) Proposed system operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams. Drawings of the calibration or verification standards.

(3) The computer test program to include software version, software design parameters, and flow charts showing acceptance/rejection settings and computer generated test stimuli (as differentiated from computer controlled standard test equipment stimuli).

(4) Schematic or block diagram of test and measuring circuits where applicable.

(5) Layout or block diagram showing overall equipment arrangement and interconnection, including the Unit Under Test (UUT).

(6) Details of adapters, cables, holding fixtures and like items as applicable.

b. Before performing the test to qualify the AIE:

(1) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification instructions.

(2) The final test plan.

(3) Computer test program, acceptance/rejection settings and a flow diagram.

(4) Detailed operating instructions indicating application of the AIE and the acceptance/rejection settings.

(5) The calibration program for each item of computer controlled test equipment and a sample printout of an actual test and calibration.

(6) A printout of the work instructions which are displayed for the operator.

iii. Final designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 6, paragraph 3.2.5) include:

(1) Results of the test including data generated, printout of test results (when normally generated), unique software test results, and calibration results.

(2) Design depicting the equipment as it was tested.

(3) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures

(4) Calibration and verification records.

e. Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. For Destructive, Environmental, and Functional (DEF) test equipment, the following information is to be provided:

i. Proposed AIE designs include:

(1) Theory of operation.

(2) Detailed drawings or sketches of the inspecting and testing elements and sufficient detail for supporting elements to facilitate evaluation for adequacy.

(3) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design along with any modifications in design or use.

(4) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.

(5) A proposed test plan to qualify the accuracy of inspection and correctness of accept or reject decisions and resultant actions (as required).

(6) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures and parameters.

(7) Settings, test conditions, calculations, and verification.

(8) Calibration and verification records.

ii. When DEF test equipment consists of AAIE or complex Designs, AIE design submissions shall include the requirements of paragraph 3.6.d above.

f. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA). MSA is any of a number of specialized methods useful for studying a measurement system and its properties (ASTM E2782, paragraph 3.1.7).

There are several basic properties of measurement systems that are widely recognized among practitioners. These are repeatability, reproducibility, linearity, bias, stability, consistency, and resolution (ASTM E2782, paragraph 5.4). An MSA is to include these properties, as applicable.

End of DI-QCIC-81960

DI-MGMT-81987

2.4 The plan shall contain the following sections:

2.4.1 Policy. This section of the plan shall describe the contractor’s policy for applying SPC, including goals and management commitment to SPC.

2.4.2 Applicable documents. This section shall include a list of documents that are the basis for the contractor’s SPC program (e.g. ANSI standard, textbooks, Government documents).

2.4.3 SPC management structure. This section shall define the SPC management structure within the organization. The identity and interrelationships of all departments involved in SPC

(e.g. Production, Quality, Engineering, Purchasing, etc.) shall also be specified.

2.4.4 SPC application personnel. All job titles and key personnel within departments involved in the application of SPC shall be identified. Also, a description of which functions are being performed by key personnel and when they are performed shall be included.

2.4.5 SPC inspection personnel. Personnel responsible for performing inspections/audits, charting and interpreting data, personnel responsible for determining, initiating and implementing corrective action upon detecting assignable causes, etc., shall be included.

2.4.6 SPC training. The section shall identify by job title and position.

a. The primary individual responsible for overseeing that SPC training is accomplished.

b. The qualification program required and in use for all personnel utilizing SPC techniques, including the qualification of trainers shall also be included.

c. The identification of who is to be trained and the type, extent and length of such training (e.g., on-the-job, classroom, etc.) and how personnel using SPC techniques are monitored when refresher training is required.

2.4.7 Manufacturing controls. The section shall identify the criteria for performing SPC capability studies and how and when these studies were applied. When gages are used, the gage repeatability and reproducibility analysis shall be completed, and accuracy shall be addressed.

2.4.8 Determination of SPC use. The section shall describe how the process/operation parameters are determined appropriate for SPC application and identify what actions are to be taken if SPC is not deemed appropriate for key or critical characteristics, special and major process/operation parameters (e.g., Pareto analysis; analysis of characteristics with tight tolerances, etc.).

2.4.9 Locating Strategy. The section shall identify how product locating is consistently used throughout production and product validation.

2.4.10 Process stability and capability criteria. The section shall identify the criteria for performing process capability studies and how and when these studies are applied. The section shall also describe how the process capability index is calculated and the frequency of these calculations.

2.4.11 Process stability and capability action and analysis. The section shall identify:

a. The actions taken as a result of each process capability study.

b. The contractor’s methodologies when process capability is for variable and attribute data.

c. The actions taken if process/operation is sub-marginal or marginal (Cpk less than 1.33 or 2.0 for criticals or grand average fraction defective is greater than 0.003 percent).

d. Analysis results of statistical distributions and all formulas and symbols utilized.

2.4.12 Control Chart policy. This section shall include the following:

a. Type of charts to be used (e.g., x bar/R x bar/S, etc.) and rationale for use.

b. Criteria for selection of sample size, frequency of sampling and rational subgroups.

c. Procedures for establishing and updating control limits, including frequency of adjustments.

d. Criteria for determining out-of-control conditions (e.g., trends, points beyond control limits, etc.) and the corrective action taken to include failure analysis when the process is unstable or when nonconforming product has resulted from unstable processes.

e. Illustration of out-of-control tests.

f. Description of method of recording pertinent facts on control charts such as changes in raw material, machines, manufacturing methods and environment, and corrective actions taken.

g. Description of how control charts are traceable to the product.

2.4.13 Vendor/subcontractor purchase controls. The section shall identify whether suppliers are required to utilize SPC and shall show the extent the vendor’s policies and procedures are consistent with in-house procedures of the prime contractor.

2.4.14 The Plan shall identify the following methods utilized to determine that suppliers have adequate controls to assure:

a. Defective products are not produced and delivered.

b. For the system utilized to audit suppliers, what will be audited, how often, and what action will be taken when out-of-control conditions exist at subcontractor/vendor facilities.

2.3.15 SPC Audit System. This section shall contain a description of the contractor’s SPC

Audit System and how the contractor plans to comply with auditing, plans for review and analysis of the outcomes, including implementation of necessary corrective action.

2.4.16 SPC records. The report shall identify various records to be used in support of SPC and describe their use. The retention periods shall also be included.

2.4.17 SPC detailed plans. The detailed plans shall describe control of specific manufacturing process/operation parameters or characteristics and shall include the following for each:

a. Identification of the process/operation by name or characteristic under control.

b. Rationale for selection or justification for non-selection if the parameter or characteristic is deemed impractical for the application of SPC techniques for parameters or characteristics identified as key, critical, special or major.

c. Description of how the characteristic is produced; the chain of events, type and number of machines involved, location of manufacturing facility, tolerances maintained, etc.

d. Production and inspection machinery used, including the production rate, number of shifts, length of shifts, whether inspection is fully or semi-automatic or manual; if the inspection is manual, identify the type of gages in use.

e. Identification of the type of charts to be maintained and whether the process/operation is performed in-house or subcontracted out.

f. Identification of the facility/vendor where process/operation parameters are targeted for

SPC.

3. Media requirements. The plan shall be in Adobe® electronic Portable Document Format

(pdf), version 2007-2010.

End of DI-MGMT-81987

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-11-14T21:07Z