utp-multi-pms2_CANY_C6_RipReport.pdf
PDF 6 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 69056723R000004
About this file
This solicitation seeks pavement preservation services for southern Utah and Nevada national parks. The work includes performing pavement condition surveys, developing pavement management plans, and conducting pavement preservation projects such as crack sealing and thin overlays. The solicitation is open to small businesses, with responses due by January 2023 and work expected to begin in spring 2023. Evaluation criteria include technical approach, past performance, and price. The total contract value is unspecified.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CANY
Cycle 6
Federal Highway Administration Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division Road Inventory Program (RIP)
Prepared By:
Road Inventory and Condition Assessment of Paved Routes Canyonlands National Park
Report Date: November 2017
Final Report in Utah
Moab
Ogden
Cortez
Roswell
Kingman Flagstaff
St. George
Albuquerque
Grand Junction
Colorado Springs
Denver
Phoenix
Cheyenne
Santa Fe
Salt Lake City
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Esri, DeLorme, GEBCO, NOAA NGDC, and other contributors ±
Canyonlands National Park
Table of Contents
4 - 1 4 - 2 4 - 4 -
SECTION PAGE NO.
1. INTRODUCTION 1 - 1
2. PARK ROUTE INVENTORY
2 - 1
3.
3 - 1
4.
APPENDIX
8 - 1
Route ID Report, Subcomponent Report, and Changes Report (As Applicable)
PAVED PARKING AREA CONDITION RATING SHEETS
Paved Parking Area Pages
PARK SUMMARY INFORMATION
Parkwide Paved Route Condition Summary
PARK ROUTE LOCATION MAPS
Route Location Key Map Route Location Area Map(s) Route Condition Key Map – PCR Mile by Mile Route Condition Area Map(s) – PCR Mile by Mile
PAVED ROAD CONDITION RATING SHEETS
Paved Road Pages 5 - 1
6 - 1
5.
6.
7. ROAD MILEPOST INFORMATION
Road Milepost Information and Logs 7 - 1
8.
Appendix A: Methodology for Determining Condition Ratings with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV)
8 - 5
Appendix B: Methodology for Determining Condition Ratings Using Manual Rating Procedures Appendix C: Description of Cycle 6 Deliverables 8 - 29
8 - 20
Appendix D: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations 8 - 33
Improvements to the RIP Index Equations and Determination of PCR 8 - 1 Description of the Rating System 8 - 2 Explanation of the Condition Descriptions 8 - 3 Description of Pavement Treatment Types 8 - 4
Explanation of Condition Descriptions Route-Level Condition Summary Reports for Data Collection Vehicle, Manually Rated, and Parking Area Routes (As Applicable)
3 - 2 3 - 3
Section 1 Introduction
1-1
Introduction
The Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA), Road Inventory Program (RIP) inventories all roads and parking areas in the National Park System, and performs condition inspections on all paved roads and parking areas for the National Park Service (NPS). This report contains the results of the Cycle 6 condition assessment of paved roads and parking lots for this park unit. This assessment was done using an automated, state-of-the-art pavement inspection vehicle as well as manual ratings. This information represents the condition of the paved assets at the time of the inspection. The pavement management system utilized by FHWA and the NPS uses these assessments to estimate future conditions and help prioritize pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Further information about RIP data and its role in managing paved roads and bridges can be obtained by contacting the NPS Regional Transportation Program Manager.
A History of the Road Inventory Program:
The FHWA, in the mid-1970s, was charged with the task of identifying surface condition deficiencies and corrective priorities on NPS roads and parkways. Additionally, FHWA was tasked with establishing an integrated maintenance features inventory, locating features such as culverts, guardrails, and signs, among others, along NPS roads and parkways. As a result, in 1976 the NPS and FHWA entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which established the RIP. This MOA was revised in 1980 to update RIP data collection standards and develop a long-range program to improve and maintain NPS roads to designated condition standards and establish a pavement management program.
The FHWA completed the initial phase of inventory in the early 1980s. As a result of this effort, each NPS unit included in the collection received a RIP Report known as the “Brown Book” which contained information that was inventoried during this first RIP phase. In the 1990s, a cyclical program was developed, and since then five cycles of collection have been completed. Cycle 6 is currently in progress.
A summary of the RIP collection cycles is shown in the table below.
Cycle Years Parks Collected
Cycle 1 1994 - 1997 44 Large Parks
Cycle 2 1997 - 2001 79 Large Parks 5 Small Parks
Cycle 3 2001 - 2004 All Large Parks All Small Parks
Cycle 4 2006 - 2010 86 Large Parks Several Small Parks
Cycle 5 2010 - 2014 All Large Parks (Only functional class 1, 2, 7, and new/modified routes collected) All Small Parks (all roads and parking areas collected)
Cycle 6 2014 – 2020 (±) All roads and parking areas collected at all Parks Additional partial collections of functional class 1, 2, and 7 roads at Large Parks Cycle 6 is expected to last 6 years
Note: Large Parks have ≥ 10 Paved Miles; Small Parks have < 10 Paved Miles
1-2
Since 1984, the Road Inventory Program has been funded through the Federal Lands Highway Park Roads and Parkways (PRP) Program. Currently, coordination of the RIP with Federal Lands Highway (FLH) is under the NPS Washington Headquarters Park Facility Management Division. The FLH Washington office coordinates policy and prepares national reports and needs assessment studies for Congress.
In 1998, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) amended Title 23 U.S.C., and inserted Section 204(a)(6) requiring the FHWA and NPS, to develop by rule, a Pavement Management System (PMS) applied to park roads and parkways serving the National Park System.
In 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) amended Title 23 U.S.C., and under Section 203(c)(1-2) stated that the National Park Service in cooperation with the DOT/FHWA, shall maintain a comprehensive national inventory of their transportation facilities, with the goal of quantifying transportation infrastructure needs within the National Park System.
A History of the Pavement Management System:
In 2005, the FHWA began implementing the use of a pavement management system to assist the NPS in prioritizing Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation activities. The system used by FHWA is the Highway Pavement Management Application (HPMA), which has the ability to store inventory and condition data from RIP and forecast future performance using prediction models. Outputs include performance and condition reports at the National, Regional, Park, or Route level. Regional prioritized lists and optimizations have been produced for most regions, and the Service’s overall roadway Deferred Maintenance is calculated via the HPMA.
Overview of Cycle 6:
Cycle 6 launched in the spring of 2014 and will again comprise all NPS park units that are served by paved roads and/or parking areas. For Cycle 6, all paved roads (approximately 5,700 miles) and parking areas will be collected in all parks at least once, while the primary routes (functional class 1, 2, and 7 roads) at Large Parks will have additional collections. These multiple collections will provide updated condition data on a majority of the NPS’s primary road network and help build a better pavement management system, allowing for more accurate pavement performance prediction models.
FLH is responsible for the accuracy of all data presented in this report. Any questions or comments concerning the contents of this report should be directed to the national RIP Coordinator located in Sterling, Virginia.
Respectfully, FHWA RIP Team
FHWA/Central Federal Lands 12300 West Dakota Ave Lakewood, CO 80228
FHWA/Eastern Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, VA 20166 ( ) 4 4- (720) 963-3556
Section 2 Park Route Inventory
,2A,2B
,1A
B
Section 3 Park Summary Information
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
Section 4 Park Route Location Maps
ROUTE LOCATION MAP
Key Map
Canyonlands National Park
±0 10 20
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
4-
±0 5 10
Miles
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, USGS, NPS Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA
1A
Rte. 0904
Rte. 0906
Rte. 0905
Rte. 0215
Rte. 0921 Rte.
R te
. 0
Rte. 0900
Rte. 0901 Rt e.
4-2
Rte. 0902
±0 1 2
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, USGS, NPS Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA
Rte. 0922
Rte. 0113
Rte. 0907
Rte. 0114
Rte. 0908 Rte. 0909
Rte. 0903
Rte. 0923
Rte. 0216
Rte. 0410 Rte. 0
4-3
±0 4.5 9
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, USGS, NPS Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA
2A 2B
Rte. 0010
Rte. 0910
Rte. 0202
4-4
±0 0.75 1.5
Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA
Rte. 0914
Rte. 0915
Rte. 0200
Rte. 0919
Rte. 0229 Rte. 0925
Rte. 0920
Rte. 0201
R
te. 0010
Rte. 0913
Rte.
Rte.
4-5
ROUTE LOCATION MAP
Map 2B
Canyonlands National Park
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA
NPS Collected Routes Non-NPS Collected Routes
Rte. 0911
Rte. 0102
Rte. 0401
Rte. 0010
Rte. 0221
Rte. 0916C Rte. 0912
Rte. 0916B Rte. 0403
4-6
Rte. 0916
ROUTE CONDITION MAP
PCR - MILE BY MILE
Key Map
Canyonlands National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 10 20
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
4-7
R te
. 0
ROUTE CONDITION MAP
PCR - MILE BY MILE
Map 1
Canyonlands National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 4.5 9
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
R te
. 0
4-8
Map 1A
Canyonlands National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 1 2
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
4-9
Map 2
Canyonlands National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 4.5 9
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
4-10
R te
.0
Rt e.0201
ROUTE CONDITION MAP
PCR - MILE BY MILE
Map 2A
Canyonlands National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 0.75 1.5
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Rte. 0229
4-11
Rte.0102
Rte.0401
Rte.
ROUTE CONDITION MAP
PCR - MILE BY MILE
Map 2B
Canyonlands National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
4-12
Section 5 Paved Road Condition Rating Sheets
Surface Type:
Inspection Date:
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0010: NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD
2 2
1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1
6/5/2017 21.85
ASPHALT
29.5 11.1
28.6 10.4
29.5
29.4 10.9
29.4 11.4
100100100100100100 939394909197
Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rating
5-1
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
11 10
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0010: NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD
2 2
6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1
6/5/2017 21.85
ASPHALT
29.5 11.1
29.9 11.7
29.9 11.6
30.1 11.4
30.1 11.5
29.8 11.1
100100100100100100 969797979897
5-2
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0010: NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD
2 2
11 12 13 14 1 1 1 1
6/5/2017 21.85
ASPHALT
29.5 11.1
29.4 11.1
30.8 11.4
30.6 11.5
11.2
30.1 11.2
100100100100100100 979799999997
5-3
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0010
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0010: NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD
2 2
16 17 18 19 1 1 1 1
6/5/2017 21.85
ASPHALT
29.5 11.1
30.5 11.1
29.8 10.8
29.4
28.6 10.9
27.9 9.8
100100100100100100 1001001001009897
5-4
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0010
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0010: NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD
2 2
0.85
6/5/2017 21.85
ASPHALT
29.5 11.1
28.3 10.6
28.2 10.9
100100100 9910097
5-5
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rt e.
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0011: ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD
2 2
1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1
6/5/2017 18.9
ASPHALT
10.7
32.9
31.6
33.3 10.7
33.9 10.8
30.4 11.1
100100100100100100 999897989899
5-6
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0011
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0011: ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD
2 2
6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1
6/5/2017 18.9
ASPHALT
10.7
29.6 11.1
28.4 11.1
32.7 10.9
27.8 10.8
26.4 11.1
100100100100100100 99991009910099
5-7
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rt e.
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0011: ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD
2 2
11 12 13 14 1 1 1 1
6/5/2017 18.9
ASPHALT
10.7
27.3 10.9
26.4 10.9
27.6 10.8
29.5 10.6
26.3 10.2
100100100100100100 1001001001009999
5-8
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0011: ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD
2 2
16 17 18 1 1 0.9
6/5/2017 18.9
ASPHALT
10.7
10.2
26.5 10.3
26.3 10.2
25.6 10.2
100100100100100 10010010010099
5-9
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0102
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0102: WOODEN SHOE LOOP
2 2
0.94
6/5/2017 1.94
ASPHALT
23.5 9.4
23.3 9.4
23.8 9.4
100100100 939393
5-10
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0113: GREEN RIVER OVERLOOK ROAD
2 2
0.35
6/5/2017 1.35
ASPHALT
22.6 9.8
22.4 9.8
23.1 9.8
100100100 100100100
5-11
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0114
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0114: UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD
2 2
1 2 3 4 1 1 1 0.78
6/5/2017 4.78
ASPHALT
26.8 10.3
26.3 10.6
27.3 10.3
10.2
27.4 10.1
27.3 10.1
100100100100100100 100100100100100100
5-12
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0200
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0200: SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND ROAD (LOOP A)
2 2
0.13
6/5/2017 1.13
ASPHALT
21.7 9.5
22.5 9.2
15.4 11.1
100100100 979998
5-13
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0201
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0201: SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND ROAD (LOOP B)
2 2
0.52
6/5/2017 0.52
ASPHALT
19.9 8.7
19.9 8.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100
5-14
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0202
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0202: NEEDLES OUTPOST ROAD
2 2
0.36
6/5/2017 0.36
ASPHALT
18.3 8.5
18.3 8.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100
5-15
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0215
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0215: WHITE RIM OVERLOOK PICNIC AREA
1 1
0.28
6/5/2017 0.28
ASPHALT
10.5
10.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100
5-16
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0216
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0216: WILLOW FLATS CAMPGROUND
1 1
0.21
6/5/2017 0.21
ASPHALT
12.7 12.7
12.7 12.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100
5-17
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0221: NEEDLES VISITOR CONTACT STATION ACCESS ROAD
2 2
0.16
6/5/2017 0.16
ASPHALT
25.4 11.8
25.4 11.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100
5-18
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0229: SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND LOOP B
1 1
0.1
6/5/2017 0.1
ASPHALT
15.5 11.4
15.5 11.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100
5-19
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0401: NEEDLES RESIDENCE ROAD
2 2
0.57
6/5/2017 0.57
ASPHALT
20.1 10.1
20.1 10.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100 100100
5-20
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0403: NEEDLES MAINTENANCE AREA LOOP
2 2
0.22
6/5/2017 0.22
ASPHALT
18.2 9.1
18.2 9.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100
5-21
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0406: I-SKY RESIDENCE ROAD
2 2
0.11
6/5/2017 0.11
ASPHALT
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100
5-22
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
1 1
0.00 0.07
3/18/2016 0.07
ASPHALT
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Canyonlands National Park
ROUTE 0410: WILLOW FLATS SERVICE ROAD
Manual Rating
5-23
ROUTE 0410: WILLOW FLATS SERVICE ROAD
Condition Photos
CANY_0410_3693.JPG
CANY_0410_3695.JPG
CANY_0410_3697.JPG
CANY_0410_3694.JPG
CANY_0410_3696.JPG
Condition photos are shown only for manually rated roads. Use the PathView program to see images of DCV rated roads.
5-24
Section 6 Paved Parking Area Condition Rating Sheets
User AccessInspection Date FMSS Number Surface Type
Curb Reveal (Inches)Area (Sq. Ft.) Lane Miles (11' Widths) Curb Recommendation
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 6.81 ON RIGHT
3/18/2016
21,243
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.366
90336 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-1
ROUTE 0900: ISLAND IN THE SKY VISITOR CENTER PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rt e.
R te
. 0
Rte. 0901
R te
. 0
± 0 270 540
Feet
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0406 (I-SKY RESIDENCE ROAD) AT MP 0.09 ON LEFT
TO PARKING
3/18/2016
3,676
NO CURB
HEAVY 3R TREATMENTS POOR / 53
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.063
61946 NONPUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-2
ROUTE 0901: SKY VISITOR CENTER EMPLOYEE PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0406
Rte. 0901
± 0 30 60
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
FROM ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 7.30 ON LEFT
TO PARKING
3/18/2016
40,429
ASPHALT
LIGHT 3R TREATMENTS FAIR / 73
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.696
66233 PUBLIC ASPHALT
MODERATE REPAIR
6-3
ROUTE 0902: NECK SPRINGS TRAILHEAD PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0011
Rte. 0902
± 0 240 480
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 12.87 ON LEFT
TO ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 12.95 ON LEFT
3/18/2016
21,721
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.374
66232 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-4
ROUTE 0903: MESA ARCH PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte.
Rte.
± 0 170 340
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 16.28 ON LEFT
TO PARKING
3/18/2016
21,612
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
0.372
66235 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-5
ROUTE 0904: BUCK CANYON OVERLOOK PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
R
te. 0011
Rte. 0904
± 0 190 380
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 18.81 ON RIGHT
TO ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 18.86 ON RIGHT
3/18/2016
11,176
NO CURB
HEAVY 3R TREATMENTS POOR / 53
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.192
66236 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-6
ROUTE 0905: ORANGE CLIFFS OVERLOOK PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rt e.
Rte. 0905
± 0 125 250
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM END OF ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD)
TO PARKING
3/18/2016
37,800
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
0.651
66234 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-7
ROUTE 0906: GRAND VIEW POINT PARKING AREA
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
R te
. 0
Rte. 0906
± 0 280 560
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0114 (UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD) AT MP 0.83 ON RIGHT
TO ROUTE 0114 (UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD) AT MP 0.88 ON RIGHT
3/18/2016
12,878
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.222
66229 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-8
ROUTE 0907: AZTEC BUTTE TRAILHEAD PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0114
Rte. 0907
± 0 140 280
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0114 (UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD) AT MP 4.00 ON RIGHT
TO ROUTE 0114 (UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD) AT MP 4.04 ON RIGHT
3/18/2016
11,698
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
0.201
66230 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-9
ROUTE 0908: WHALE ROCK TRAILHEAD PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0114
Rte. 0908
± 0 130 260
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM END OF ROUTE 0114 (UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD)
TO PARKING
3/18/2016
19,975
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.344
66231 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-10
ROUTE 0909: UPHEAVAL DOME PICNIC PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0114
Rte. 0909
± 0 140 280
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
FROM ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 7.63 ON RIGHT
TO ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 7.72 ON RIGHT
3/18/2016
9,351
CONCRETE
HEAVY 3R TREATMENTS POOR / 53
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.161
67880 PUBLIC ASPHALT
LIGHT REPAIR
6-11
ROUTE 0910: INDIAN CREEK PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0010
Rte. 0910
± 0 160 320
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0221 (NEEDLES VISITOR CONTACT STATION ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 0.08 ON RIGHT
TO ROUTE 0221 (NEEDLES VISITOR CONTACT STATION ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 0.15 ON RIGHT
Note: Parking area consists of multiple surface types: 1 part Asphalt at 35,978 square feet;
1 part Concrete at 4,086 square feet.
3/18/2016
40,064
NO CURB
LIGHT 3R TREATMENTS FAIR / 73
CONCRETE
0.69
45708 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-12
ROUTE 0911: NEEDLES VISITOR CENTER PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
R
te. 0221
Rte. 0911
± 0 190 380
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 17.55 ON LEFT
TO ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 17.58 ON LEFT
3/18/2016
6,826
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
0.118
67873 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-13
ROUTE 0912: WOODEN SHOE PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rt e.
Rte. 0912
± 0 80 160
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 19.97 ON LEFT
TO ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 20.00 ON LEFT
3/18/2016
6,866
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
0.118
67865 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-14
ROUTE 0913: THE PICNIC AREA (NEEDLES)
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0010
Rte. 0913
± 0 75 150
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 20.39 ON LEFT
TO ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 20.42 ON LEFT
3/18/2016
9,222
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
0.159
47627 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-15
ROUTE 0914: POTHOLE HILL TRAILHEAD PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rt e.
Rte. 0914
± 0 90 180
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM END OF ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD)
TO PARKING
3/18/2016
16,951
NO CURB
LIGHT 3R TREATMENTS FAIR / 73
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.292
67877 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-16
ROUTE 0915: BIG SPRINGS PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0010
Rte. 0915
± 0 175 350
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0403 (NEEDLES MAINTENANCE AREA LOOP) AT MP 0.04 ON RIGHT
TO ROUTE 0403 (NEEDLES MAINTENANCE AREA LOOP) AT MP 0.09 ON RIGHT
Note: Parking area consists of multiple surface types: 1 part Asphalt at 26,740 square feet;
1 part Concrete at 738 square feet.
3/18/2016
27,478
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.473
67875 NONPUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-17
ROUTE 0916A: NEEDLES MAINTENANCE YARD COMPLEX AREA A
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0403
Rte. 0916A
Rte.
0916B
± 0 160 320
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0403 (NEEDLES MAINTENANCE AREA LOOP) AT MP 0.07 ON RIGHT
3/18/2016
1,055
NO CURB
LIGHT 3R TREATMENTS FAIR / 73
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.018
102708 NONPUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-18
ROUTE 0916B: NEEDLES MAINTENANCE YARD COMPLEX AREA B
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0403
Rte. 0916B
± 0 25 50
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0403 (NEEDLES MAINTENANCE AREA LOOP) AT MP 0.14 ON RIGHT
3/18/2016
1,544
NO CURB
LIGHT 3R TREATMENTS FAIR / 73
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.027
102710 NONPUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-19
ROUTE 0916C: NEEDLES MAINTENANCE YARD COMPLEX AREA C
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rt e.
Rte. 0916C
± 0 40 80
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0200 (SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND ROAD (LOOP A)) AT MP 0.77 ON RIGHT
3/18/2016
1,033
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.018
102711 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-20
ROUTE 0918: SQUAW FLAT RESTROOM A PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0200
Rte. 0918
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0200 (SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND ROAD (LOOP A)) AT MP 0.91 ON LEFT
3/18/2016
9,057
NO CURB
HEAVY 3R TREATMENTS POOR / 53
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.156
102712 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-21
ROUTE 0919: SQUAW FLAT TRAILHEAD PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0200
Rte. 0919
± 0 150 300
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0201 (SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND ROAD (LOOP B)) AT MP 0.42 ON LEFT
3/18/2016
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.01
102715 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-22
ROUTE 0920: SQUAW FLAT RESTROOM B PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0201
Rte. 0920
± 0 10 20
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0215 (WHITE RIM OVERLOOK PICNIC AREA) AT MP 0.14 ON RIGHT
3/18/2016
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.017
102716 PUBLIC ASPHALT
NOT APPLICABLE
6-23
ROUTE 0921: WHITE RIM OVERLOOK PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0215
Rte. 0921
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM END OF ROUTE 0113 (GREEN RIVER OVERLOOK ROAD)
TO PARKING
3/18/2016
19,417
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
0.334
90764 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-24
ROUTE 0922: GREEN RIVER OVERLOOK PARKING
Manual Rating
Canyonlands National Park
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
R te
. 0
Rte. 0922
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0216 (WILLOW FLATS CAMPGROUND) AT MP…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .