utp-multi-pms2_CANY_C6_RipReport.pdf

PDF 6 MB Posted

Attached to
UT NP MULTI PMS(2), Pavement Preservation Southern Utah & NV NP GRBA PMS(1), Pavement Preservation Great Basin
Solicitation number
69056723R000004
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation seeks pavement preservation services for southern Utah and Nevada national parks. The work includes performing pavement condition surveys, developing pavement management plans, and conducting pavement preservation projects such as crack sealing and thin overlays. The solicitation is open to small businesses, with responses due by January 2023 and work expected to begin in spring 2023. Evaluation criteria include technical approach, past performance, and price. The total contract value is unspecified.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment A006.pdf PDF
Amendment A005.pdf PDF
QA_01-19-2024.pdf PDF
Amendment A004.pdf PDF
QA_01-17-2024_2.pdf PDF
QA_01-17-2024.pdf PDF
Amendment A003.pdf PDF
QA_01-10-2024.pdf PDF
Amendment A002.pdf PDF
QA 01-03-2024.pdf PDF
Amendment A001.pdf PDF
QA 12.01.23.pdf PDF
utp-multi-pms2_CEBR_C6_RipReport.pdf PDF
utp-multi-pms2_ARCH_C6_RipReport.pdf PDF
utp-multi-pms2_GRBA_C6_RipReport.pdf PDF
utp-multi-pms2_TICA_C6_RipReport.pdf PDF
utp-multi-pms2_ZION_C6_RipReport.pdf PDF
utp-muliti-pms2_Plan.pdf PDF
RFP 69056723R000004.pdf PDF
utp-multi-pms2_FLH Bridge oversized or overload vehicle permit .pdf PDF
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CANY

Cycle 6

Federal Highway Administration Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division Road Inventory Program (RIP)

Prepared By:

Road Inventory and Condition Assessment of Paved Routes Canyonlands National Park

Report Date: November 2017

Final Report in Utah

Moab

Ogden

Cortez

Roswell

Kingman Flagstaff

St. George

Albuquerque

Grand Junction

Colorado Springs

Denver

Phoenix

Cheyenne

Santa Fe

Salt Lake City

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Esri, DeLorme, GEBCO, NOAA NGDC, and other contributors ±

Canyonlands National Park

Table of Contents

4 - 1 4 - 2 4 - 4 -

SECTION PAGE NO.

1. INTRODUCTION 1 - 1

2. PARK ROUTE INVENTORY

2 - 1

3.

3 - 1

4.

APPENDIX

8 - 1

Route ID Report, Subcomponent Report, and Changes Report (As Applicable)

PAVED PARKING AREA CONDITION RATING SHEETS

Paved Parking Area Pages

PARK SUMMARY INFORMATION

Parkwide Paved Route Condition Summary

PARK ROUTE LOCATION MAPS

Route Location Key Map Route Location Area Map(s) Route Condition Key Map – PCR Mile by Mile Route Condition Area Map(s) – PCR Mile by Mile

PAVED ROAD CONDITION RATING SHEETS

Paved Road Pages 5 - 1

6 - 1

5.

6.

7. ROAD MILEPOST INFORMATION

Road Milepost Information and Logs 7 - 1

8.

Appendix A: Methodology for Determining Condition Ratings with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV)

8 - 5

Appendix B: Methodology for Determining Condition Ratings Using Manual Rating Procedures Appendix C: Description of Cycle 6 Deliverables 8 - 29

8 - 20

Appendix D: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations 8 - 33

Improvements to the RIP Index Equations and Determination of PCR 8 - 1 Description of the Rating System 8 - 2 Explanation of the Condition Descriptions 8 - 3 Description of Pavement Treatment Types 8 - 4

Explanation of Condition Descriptions Route-Level Condition Summary Reports for Data Collection Vehicle, Manually Rated, and Parking Area Routes (As Applicable)

3 - 2 3 - 3

Section 1 Introduction

1-1

Introduction

The Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA), Road Inventory Program (RIP) inventories all roads and parking areas in the National Park System, and performs condition inspections on all paved roads and parking areas for the National Park Service (NPS). This report contains the results of the Cycle 6 condition assessment of paved roads and parking lots for this park unit. This assessment was done using an automated, state-of-the-art pavement inspection vehicle as well as manual ratings. This information represents the condition of the paved assets at the time of the inspection. The pavement management system utilized by FHWA and the NPS uses these assessments to estimate future conditions and help prioritize pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Further information about RIP data and its role in managing paved roads and bridges can be obtained by contacting the NPS Regional Transportation Program Manager.

A History of the Road Inventory Program:

The FHWA, in the mid-1970s, was charged with the task of identifying surface condition deficiencies and corrective priorities on NPS roads and parkways. Additionally, FHWA was tasked with establishing an integrated maintenance features inventory, locating features such as culverts, guardrails, and signs, among others, along NPS roads and parkways. As a result, in 1976 the NPS and FHWA entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which established the RIP. This MOA was revised in 1980 to update RIP data collection standards and develop a long-range program to improve and maintain NPS roads to designated condition standards and establish a pavement management program.

The FHWA completed the initial phase of inventory in the early 1980s. As a result of this effort, each NPS unit included in the collection received a RIP Report known as the “Brown Book” which contained information that was inventoried during this first RIP phase. In the 1990s, a cyclical program was developed, and since then five cycles of collection have been completed. Cycle 6 is currently in progress.

A summary of the RIP collection cycles is shown in the table below.

Cycle Years Parks Collected

Cycle 1 1994 - 1997 44 Large Parks

Cycle 2 1997 - 2001 79 Large Parks 5 Small Parks

Cycle 3 2001 - 2004 All Large Parks All Small Parks

Cycle 4 2006 - 2010 86 Large Parks Several Small Parks

Cycle 5 2010 - 2014 All Large Parks (Only functional class 1, 2, 7, and new/modified routes collected) All Small Parks (all roads and parking areas collected)

Cycle 6 2014 – 2020 (±) All roads and parking areas collected at all Parks Additional partial collections of functional class 1, 2, and 7 roads at Large Parks Cycle 6 is expected to last 6 years

Note: Large Parks have ≥ 10 Paved Miles; Small Parks have < 10 Paved Miles

1-2

Since 1984, the Road Inventory Program has been funded through the Federal Lands Highway Park Roads and Parkways (PRP) Program. Currently, coordination of the RIP with Federal Lands Highway (FLH) is under the NPS Washington Headquarters Park Facility Management Division. The FLH Washington office coordinates policy and prepares national reports and needs assessment studies for Congress.

In 1998, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) amended Title 23 U.S.C., and inserted Section 204(a)(6) requiring the FHWA and NPS, to develop by rule, a Pavement Management System (PMS) applied to park roads and parkways serving the National Park System.

In 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) amended Title 23 U.S.C., and under Section 203(c)(1-2) stated that the National Park Service in cooperation with the DOT/FHWA, shall maintain a comprehensive national inventory of their transportation facilities, with the goal of quantifying transportation infrastructure needs within the National Park System.

A History of the Pavement Management System:

In 2005, the FHWA began implementing the use of a pavement management system to assist the NPS in prioritizing Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation activities. The system used by FHWA is the Highway Pavement Management Application (HPMA), which has the ability to store inventory and condition data from RIP and forecast future performance using prediction models. Outputs include performance and condition reports at the National, Regional, Park, or Route level. Regional prioritized lists and optimizations have been produced for most regions, and the Service’s overall roadway Deferred Maintenance is calculated via the HPMA.

Overview of Cycle 6:

Cycle 6 launched in the spring of 2014 and will again comprise all NPS park units that are served by paved roads and/or parking areas. For Cycle 6, all paved roads (approximately 5,700 miles) and parking areas will be collected in all parks at least once, while the primary routes (functional class 1, 2, and 7 roads) at Large Parks will have additional collections. These multiple collections will provide updated condition data on a majority of the NPS’s primary road network and help build a better pavement management system, allowing for more accurate pavement performance prediction models.

FLH is responsible for the accuracy of all data presented in this report. Any questions or comments concerning the contents of this report should be directed to the national RIP Coordinator located in Sterling, Virginia.

Respectfully, FHWA RIP Team

FHWA/Central Federal Lands 12300 West Dakota Ave Lakewood, CO 80228

FHWA/Eastern Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, VA 20166 ( ) 4 4- (720) 963-3556

Section 2 Park Route Inventory

,2A,2B

,1A

B

Section 3 Park Summary Information

3-1

3-2

3-3

3-4

3-5

Section 4 Park Route Location Maps

ROUTE LOCATION MAP

Key Map

Canyonlands National Park

±0 10 20

Miles

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads

4-

±0 5 10

Miles

Sources: Esri, DeLorme, USGS, NPS Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA

1A

Rte. 0904

Rte. 0906

Rte. 0905

Rte. 0215

Rte. 0921 Rte.

R te

. 0

Rte. 0900

Rte. 0901 Rt e.

4-2

Rte. 0902

±0 1 2

Sources: Esri, DeLorme, USGS, NPS Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA

Rte. 0922

Rte. 0113

Rte. 0907

Rte. 0114

Rte. 0908 Rte. 0909

Rte. 0903

Rte. 0923

Rte. 0216

Rte. 0410 Rte. 0

4-3

±0 4.5 9

Sources: Esri, DeLorme, USGS, NPS Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA

2A 2B

Rte. 0010

Rte. 0910

Rte. 0202

4-4

±0 0.75 1.5

Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA

Rte. 0914

Rte. 0915

Rte. 0200

Rte. 0919

Rte. 0229 Rte. 0925

Rte. 0920

Rte. 0201

R

te. 0010

Rte. 0913

Rte.

Rte.

4-5

ROUTE LOCATION MAP

Map 2B

Canyonlands National Park

±0 0.5 1

Miles

Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA

NPS Collected Routes Non-NPS Collected Routes

Rte. 0911

Rte. 0102

Rte. 0401

Rte. 0010

Rte. 0221

Rte. 0916C Rte. 0912

Rte. 0916B Rte. 0403

4-6

Rte. 0916

ROUTE CONDITION MAP

PCR - MILE BY MILE

Key Map

Canyonlands National Park

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

±0 10 20

Miles

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed

Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

4-7

R te

. 0

ROUTE CONDITION MAP

PCR - MILE BY MILE

Map 1

Canyonlands National Park

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

±0 4.5 9

Miles

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed

Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

R te

. 0

4-8

Map 1A

Canyonlands National Park

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

±0 1 2

Miles

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed

Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

4-9

Map 2

Canyonlands National Park

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

±0 4.5 9

Miles

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed

4-10

R te

.0

Rt e.0201

ROUTE CONDITION MAP

PCR - MILE BY MILE

Map 2A

Canyonlands National Park

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

±0 0.75 1.5

Miles

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed

Rte. 0229

4-11

Rte.0102

Rte.0401

Rte.

ROUTE CONDITION MAP

PCR - MILE BY MILE

Map 2B

Canyonlands National Park

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

±0 0.5 1

Miles

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed

4-12

Section 5 Paved Road Condition Rating Sheets

Surface Type:

Inspection Date:

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0010: NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD

2 2

1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1

6/5/2017 21.85

ASPHALT

29.5 11.1

28.6 10.4

29.5

29.4 10.9

29.4 11.4

100100100100100100 939394909197

Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rating

5-1

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

11 10

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0010: NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD

2 2

6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1

6/5/2017 21.85

ASPHALT

29.5 11.1

29.9 11.7

29.9 11.6

30.1 11.4

30.1 11.5

29.8 11.1

100100100100100100 969797979897

5-2

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0010: NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD

2 2

11 12 13 14 1 1 1 1

6/5/2017 21.85

ASPHALT

29.5 11.1

29.4 11.1

30.8 11.4

30.6 11.5

11.2

30.1 11.2

100100100100100100 979799999997

5-3

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rte. 0010

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0010: NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD

2 2

16 17 18 19 1 1 1 1

6/5/2017 21.85

ASPHALT

29.5 11.1

30.5 11.1

29.8 10.8

29.4

28.6 10.9

27.9 9.8

100100100100100100 1001001001009897

5-4

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rte. 0010

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0010: NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD

2 2

0.85

6/5/2017 21.85

ASPHALT

29.5 11.1

28.3 10.6

28.2 10.9

100100100 9910097

5-5

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rt e.

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0011: ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD

2 2

1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1

6/5/2017 18.9

ASPHALT

10.7

32.9

31.6

33.3 10.7

33.9 10.8

30.4 11.1

100100100100100100 999897989899

5-6

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rte. 0011

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0011: ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD

2 2

6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1

6/5/2017 18.9

ASPHALT

10.7

29.6 11.1

28.4 11.1

32.7 10.9

27.8 10.8

26.4 11.1

100100100100100100 99991009910099

5-7

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rt e.

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0011: ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD

2 2

11 12 13 14 1 1 1 1

6/5/2017 18.9

ASPHALT

10.7

27.3 10.9

26.4 10.9

27.6 10.8

29.5 10.6

26.3 10.2

100100100100100100 1001001001009999

5-8

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0011: ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD

2 2

16 17 18 1 1 0.9

6/5/2017 18.9

ASPHALT

10.7

10.2

26.5 10.3

26.3 10.2

25.6 10.2

100100100100100 10010010010099

5-9

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rte. 0102

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0102: WOODEN SHOE LOOP

2 2

0.94

6/5/2017 1.94

ASPHALT

23.5 9.4

23.3 9.4

23.8 9.4

100100100 939393

5-10

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0113: GREEN RIVER OVERLOOK ROAD

2 2

0.35

6/5/2017 1.35

ASPHALT

22.6 9.8

22.4 9.8

23.1 9.8

100100100 100100100

5-11

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rte. 0114

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0114: UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD

2 2

1 2 3 4 1 1 1 0.78

6/5/2017 4.78

ASPHALT

26.8 10.3

26.3 10.6

27.3 10.3

10.2

27.4 10.1

27.3 10.1

100100100100100100 100100100100100100

5-12

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rte. 0200

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0200: SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND ROAD (LOOP A)

2 2

0.13

6/5/2017 1.13

ASPHALT

21.7 9.5

22.5 9.2

15.4 11.1

100100100 979998

5-13

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rte. 0201

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0201: SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND ROAD (LOOP B)

2 2

0.52

6/5/2017 0.52

ASPHALT

19.9 8.7

19.9 8.7

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100100

5-14

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rte. 0202

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0202: NEEDLES OUTPOST ROAD

2 2

0.36

6/5/2017 0.36

ASPHALT

18.3 8.5

18.3 8.5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100100

5-15

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rte. 0215

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0215: WHITE RIM OVERLOOK PICNIC AREA

1 1

0.28

6/5/2017 0.28

ASPHALT

10.5

10.5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100100

5-16

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Rte. 0216

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0216: WILLOW FLATS CAMPGROUND

1 1

0.21

6/5/2017 0.21

ASPHALT

12.7 12.7

12.7 12.7

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100100

5-17

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0221: NEEDLES VISITOR CONTACT STATION ACCESS ROAD

2 2

0.16

6/5/2017 0.16

ASPHALT

25.4 11.8

25.4 11.8

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100100

5-18

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0229: SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND LOOP B

1 1

0.1

6/5/2017 0.1

ASPHALT

15.5 11.4

15.5 11.4

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100100

5-19

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0401: NEEDLES RESIDENCE ROAD

2 2

0.57

6/5/2017 0.57

ASPHALT

20.1 10.1

20.1 10.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100100 100100

5-20

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0403: NEEDLES MAINTENANCE AREA LOOP

2 2

0.22

6/5/2017 0.22

ASPHALT

18.2 9.1

18.2 9.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100100

5-21

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0406: I-SKY RESIDENCE ROAD

2 2

0.11

6/5/2017 0.11

ASPHALT

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100100

5-22

Paved Length (Miles):

Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information

Longitudinal Crack Index

Distress Index Values

Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP

Surface Condition Rating (SCR)

Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)

Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)

Roughness Condition Index (RCI)

Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

1 1

0.00 0.07

3/18/2016 0.07

ASPHALT

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Canyonlands National Park

ROUTE 0410: WILLOW FLATS SERVICE ROAD

Manual Rating

5-23

ROUTE 0410: WILLOW FLATS SERVICE ROAD

Condition Photos

CANY_0410_3693.JPG

CANY_0410_3695.JPG

CANY_0410_3697.JPG

CANY_0410_3694.JPG

CANY_0410_3696.JPG

Condition photos are shown only for manually rated roads. Use the PathView program to see images of DCV rated roads.

5-24

Section 6 Paved Parking Area Condition Rating Sheets

User AccessInspection Date FMSS Number Surface Type

Curb Reveal (Inches)Area (Sq. Ft.) Lane Miles (11' Widths) Curb Recommendation

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 6.81 ON RIGHT

3/18/2016

21,243

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.366

90336 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-1

ROUTE 0900: ISLAND IN THE SKY VISITOR CENTER PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rt e.

R te

. 0

Rte. 0901

R te

. 0

± 0 270 540

Feet

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0406 (I-SKY RESIDENCE ROAD) AT MP 0.09 ON LEFT

TO PARKING

3/18/2016

3,676

NO CURB

HEAVY 3R TREATMENTS POOR / 53

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.063

61946 NONPUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-2

ROUTE 0901: SKY VISITOR CENTER EMPLOYEE PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0406

Rte. 0901

± 0 30 60

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

FROM ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 7.30 ON LEFT

TO PARKING

3/18/2016

40,429

ASPHALT

LIGHT 3R TREATMENTS FAIR / 73

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.696

66233 PUBLIC ASPHALT

MODERATE REPAIR

6-3

ROUTE 0902: NECK SPRINGS TRAILHEAD PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0011

Rte. 0902

± 0 240 480

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 12.87 ON LEFT

TO ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 12.95 ON LEFT

3/18/2016

21,721

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.374

66232 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-4

ROUTE 0903: MESA ARCH PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte.

Rte.

± 0 170 340

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 16.28 ON LEFT

TO PARKING

3/18/2016

21,612

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

CONCRETE

0.372

66235 PUBLIC ASPHALT

DO NOTHING

6-5

ROUTE 0904: BUCK CANYON OVERLOOK PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

R

te. 0011

Rte. 0904

± 0 190 380

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 18.81 ON RIGHT

TO ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD) AT MP 18.86 ON RIGHT

3/18/2016

11,176

NO CURB

HEAVY 3R TREATMENTS POOR / 53

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.192

66236 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-6

ROUTE 0905: ORANGE CLIFFS OVERLOOK PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rt e.

Rte. 0905

± 0 125 250

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM END OF ROUTE 0011 (ISLAND IN THE SKY ROAD)

TO PARKING

3/18/2016

37,800

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

CONCRETE

0.651

66234 PUBLIC ASPHALT

DO NOTHING

6-7

ROUTE 0906: GRAND VIEW POINT PARKING AREA

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

R te

. 0

Rte. 0906

± 0 280 560

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0114 (UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD) AT MP 0.83 ON RIGHT

TO ROUTE 0114 (UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD) AT MP 0.88 ON RIGHT

3/18/2016

12,878

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.222

66229 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-8

ROUTE 0907: AZTEC BUTTE TRAILHEAD PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0114

Rte. 0907

± 0 140 280

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0114 (UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD) AT MP 4.00 ON RIGHT

TO ROUTE 0114 (UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD) AT MP 4.04 ON RIGHT

3/18/2016

11,698

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

CONCRETE

0.201

66230 PUBLIC ASPHALT

DO NOTHING

6-9

ROUTE 0908: WHALE ROCK TRAILHEAD PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0114

Rte. 0908

± 0 130 260

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM END OF ROUTE 0114 (UPHEAVAL DOME ROAD)

TO PARKING

3/18/2016

19,975

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.344

66231 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-10

ROUTE 0909: UPHEAVAL DOME PICNIC PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0114

Rte. 0909

± 0 140 280

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

FROM ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 7.63 ON RIGHT

TO ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 7.72 ON RIGHT

3/18/2016

9,351

CONCRETE

HEAVY 3R TREATMENTS POOR / 53

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.161

67880 PUBLIC ASPHALT

LIGHT REPAIR

6-11

ROUTE 0910: INDIAN CREEK PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0010

Rte. 0910

± 0 160 320

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0221 (NEEDLES VISITOR CONTACT STATION ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 0.08 ON RIGHT

TO ROUTE 0221 (NEEDLES VISITOR CONTACT STATION ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 0.15 ON RIGHT

Note: Parking area consists of multiple surface types: 1 part Asphalt at 35,978 square feet;

1 part Concrete at 4,086 square feet.

3/18/2016

40,064

NO CURB

LIGHT 3R TREATMENTS FAIR / 73

CONCRETE

0.69

45708 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-12

ROUTE 0911: NEEDLES VISITOR CENTER PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

R

te. 0221

Rte. 0911

± 0 190 380

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 17.55 ON LEFT

TO ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 17.58 ON LEFT

3/18/2016

6,826

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

CONCRETE

0.118

67873 PUBLIC ASPHALT

DO NOTHING

6-13

ROUTE 0912: WOODEN SHOE PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rt e.

Rte. 0912

± 0 80 160

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 19.97 ON LEFT

TO ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 20.00 ON LEFT

3/18/2016

6,866

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

CONCRETE

0.118

67865 PUBLIC ASPHALT

DO NOTHING

6-14

ROUTE 0913: THE PICNIC AREA (NEEDLES)

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0010

Rte. 0913

± 0 75 150

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 20.39 ON LEFT

TO ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD) AT MP 20.42 ON LEFT

3/18/2016

9,222

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

CONCRETE

0.159

47627 PUBLIC ASPHALT

DO NOTHING

6-15

ROUTE 0914: POTHOLE HILL TRAILHEAD PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rt e.

Rte. 0914

± 0 90 180

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM END OF ROUTE 0010 (NEEDLES ACCESS ROAD)

TO PARKING

3/18/2016

16,951

NO CURB

LIGHT 3R TREATMENTS FAIR / 73

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.292

67877 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-16

ROUTE 0915: BIG SPRINGS PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0010

Rte. 0915

± 0 175 350

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM ROUTE 0403 (NEEDLES MAINTENANCE AREA LOOP) AT MP 0.04 ON RIGHT

TO ROUTE 0403 (NEEDLES MAINTENANCE AREA LOOP) AT MP 0.09 ON RIGHT

Note: Parking area consists of multiple surface types: 1 part Asphalt at 26,740 square feet;

1 part Concrete at 738 square feet.

3/18/2016

27,478

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.473

67875 NONPUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-17

ROUTE 0916A: NEEDLES MAINTENANCE YARD COMPLEX AREA A

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0403

Rte. 0916A

Rte.

0916B

± 0 160 320

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0403 (NEEDLES MAINTENANCE AREA LOOP) AT MP 0.07 ON RIGHT

3/18/2016

1,055

NO CURB

LIGHT 3R TREATMENTS FAIR / 73

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.018

102708 NONPUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-18

ROUTE 0916B: NEEDLES MAINTENANCE YARD COMPLEX AREA B

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0403

Rte. 0916B

± 0 25 50

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0403 (NEEDLES MAINTENANCE AREA LOOP) AT MP 0.14 ON RIGHT

3/18/2016

1,544

NO CURB

LIGHT 3R TREATMENTS FAIR / 73

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.027

102710 NONPUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-19

ROUTE 0916C: NEEDLES MAINTENANCE YARD COMPLEX AREA C

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rt e.

Rte. 0916C

± 0 40 80

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0200 (SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND ROAD (LOOP A)) AT MP 0.77 ON RIGHT

3/18/2016

1,033

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.018

102711 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-20

ROUTE 0918: SQUAW FLAT RESTROOM A PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0200

Rte. 0918

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0200 (SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND ROAD (LOOP A)) AT MP 0.91 ON LEFT

3/18/2016

9,057

NO CURB

HEAVY 3R TREATMENTS POOR / 53

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.156

102712 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-21

ROUTE 0919: SQUAW FLAT TRAILHEAD PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0200

Rte. 0919

± 0 150 300

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0201 (SQUAW FLAT CAMPGROUND ROAD (LOOP B)) AT MP 0.42 ON LEFT

3/18/2016

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.01

102715 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-22

ROUTE 0920: SQUAW FLAT RESTROOM B PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0201

Rte. 0920

± 0 10 20

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0215 (WHITE RIM OVERLOOK PICNIC AREA) AT MP 0.14 ON RIGHT

3/18/2016

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

NO CURB AND GUTTER

0.017

102716 PUBLIC ASPHALT

NOT APPLICABLE

6-23

ROUTE 0921: WHITE RIM OVERLOOK PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

Rte. 0215

Rte. 0921

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

FROM END OF ROUTE 0113 (GREEN RIVER OVERLOOK ROAD)

TO PARKING

3/18/2016

19,417

NO CURB

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90

CONCRETE

0.334

90764 PUBLIC ASPHALT

DO NOTHING

6-24

ROUTE 0922: GREEN RIVER OVERLOOK PARKING

Manual Rating

Canyonlands National Park

Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)

See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated

R te

. 0

Rte. 0922

Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type

Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0216 (WILLOW FLATS CAMPGROUND) AT MP…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .