Unemployment_Cost_Management_Services.pdf

PDF 470 KB Posted

Attached to
Unemployment Cost Management Services
Solicitation number
RFP GGS-25-0720
Issued by
Maricopa County, Phoenix City, Arizona

About this file

This is a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Unemployment Cost Management Services issued by the City of Phoenix Finance Central Procurement Division, solicitation number RFP GGS-25-0720. The RFP was released on April 22, 2025, with a deadline for questions on May 13, 2025, and a response deadline of May 20, 2025, at 2:00 pm. A non-mandatory pre-offer conference is scheduled for April 29, 2025, at 2:00 pm via Microsoft Teams. The contract term is set to commence on or about June 1, 2026, and will continue for a period of five years. The City seeks a contractor to provide comprehensive unemployment cost management services, including claims management, hearing representation, benefit charge audits, reporting, legislative updates, and training.

The pricing proposal requires vendors to submit a total price for all services specified in the Scope of Work, with the option to provide additional pricing for any extra services not listed. The RFP emphasizes the importance of confidentiality, data protection, and background screening for contract workers. Vendors must be registered in the City's OpenGov Procurement Portal and procurePHX Self-Registration System. The evaluation will be conducted in two phases, with the first phase focusing on technical and qualitative aspects (weighing 750 points) and the second phase evaluating pricing (250 points). The City reserves the right to award the contract to the most responsive and responsible offeror based on the evaluation criteria, with a focus on the contractor's experience, technical capabilities, and cost-effectiveness.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - GOODS AND SERVICES

RFP GGS-25-0720

UNEMPLOYMENT COST MANAGEMENT SERVICES

City of Phoenix

Finance Central Procurement

251 W Washington St

8th Floor

Phoenix, AZ

85003

RELEASE DATE: April 22, 2025

DEADLINE FOR QUESTIONS: May 13, 2025

RESPONSE DEADLINE: May 20, 2025, 2:00 pm

City of Phoenix

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - GOODS AND SERVICES

RFP GGS-25-0720

Unemployment Cost Management Services

1. INTRODUCTION

2. INSTRUCTIONS

3. SCOPE OF WORK

4. EVALUATION PROCESS

5. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS

6. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

7. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION

8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

9. SUBMITTALS

10. PRICING PROPOSAL

Attachments:

A - Acceptance_of_Offer_Form_2026

Request For Proposal - Goods and Services #RFP GGS-25-0720 Title: Unemployment Cost Management Services

1. Introduction

1.1. Contact Information

Chad Elms

Finance Central Procurement

Email: chad.elms@phoenix.gov

Phone: (602) 261-8053

1.2. Schedule of Events

The City reserves the right to change dates, times, and locations, as necessary. The City does not always hold a Pre-Offer Conference or Site Visit. All times in the Schedule of Events are

Local Phoenix, AZ Time.

To request a reasonable accommodation or alternative format for any public meeting, please contact the Procurement Officer (Chad Elms) at (602) 261-8053/Voice or 711/TTY, or chad.elms@phoenix.gov, no later than two (2) weeks prior to the meeting.

Solicitation Issue Date: April 22, 2025

Pre-Offer Conference (Non-Mandatory): April 29, 2025, 2:00pm https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MjdhNDQwMTQtOWIy

My00YTc4LWJhZGItOTQ5YTU1NjUzMTY1

%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22

%3a%2296b9695c-4f0e-42bd-8adf-ba755760346b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%

22f64e87ae-5447-45df-a47a-

63aaf2ed7fb8%22%7d

Written Inquiries Due Date: May 13, 2025, 2:00pm

Offer Due Date: May 20, 2025, 2:00pm https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MjdhNDQwMTQtOWIyMy00YTc4LWJhZGItOTQ5YTU1NjUzMTY1%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2296b9695c-4f0e-42bd-8adf-ba755760346b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22f64e87ae-5447-45df-a47a-63aaf2ed7fb8%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MjdhNDQwMTQtOWIyMy00YTc4LWJhZGItOTQ5YTU1NjUzMTY1%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2296b9695c-4f0e-42bd-8adf-ba755760346b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22f64e87ae-5447-45df-a47a-63aaf2ed7fb8%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MjdhNDQwMTQtOWIyMy00YTc4LWJhZGItOTQ5YTU1NjUzMTY1%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2296b9695c-4f0e-42bd-8adf-ba755760346b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22f64e87ae-5447-45df-a47a-63aaf2ed7fb8%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MjdhNDQwMTQtOWIyMy00YTc4LWJhZGItOTQ5YTU1NjUzMTY1%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2296b9695c-4f0e-42bd-8adf-ba755760346b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22f64e87ae-5447-45df-a47a-63aaf2ed7fb8%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MjdhNDQwMTQtOWIyMy00YTc4LWJhZGItOTQ5YTU1NjUzMTY1%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2296b9695c-4f0e-42bd-8adf-ba755760346b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22f64e87ae-5447-45df-a47a-63aaf2ed7fb8%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MjdhNDQwMTQtOWIyMy00YTc4LWJhZGItOTQ5YTU1NjUzMTY1%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2296b9695c-4f0e-42bd-8adf-ba755760346b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22f64e87ae-5447-45df-a47a-63aaf2ed7fb8%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MjdhNDQwMTQtOWIyMy00YTc4LWJhZGItOTQ5YTU1NjUzMTY1%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2296b9695c-4f0e-42bd-8adf-ba755760346b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22f64e87ae-5447-45df-a47a-63aaf2ed7fb8%22%7d https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MjdhNDQwMTQtOWIyMy00YTc4LWJhZGItOTQ5YTU1NjUzMTY1%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2296b9695c-4f0e-42bd-8adf-ba755760346b%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22f64e87ae-5447-45df-a47a-63aaf2ed7fb8%22%7d

2. Instructions

2.1. City’s Vendor Self-Registration and Notification

Vendors must be registered in the City’s OpenGov Procurement Portal at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix to respond to solicitations and access procurement information.

Vendors must also be registered in the City’s procurePHX Self-Registration System at https://www.phoenix.gov/procure prior to contract execution.

The City may, at its sole discretion, reject any offer from an Offeror who has not registered.

2.2. Preparation of Offer

All forms provided must be completed and submitted with the Offer. The signed and completed

Conflict of Interest and Transparency form must be included, or your Offer may be deemed non-responsive.

It is permissible to copy Submittal forms if necessary. Erasures, interlineations, or other modifications of the Offer must be initialed in original ink by the authorized person signing the

Offer. No offer will be altered, amended or withdrawn after the specified offer due date and time.

The City is not responsible for Offeror’s errors or omissions.

All time periods stated as a number of days will be calendar days.

It is the responsibility of all Offerors to examine the entire solicitation and seek clarification of any requirement that may not be clear and to check all responses for accuracy before submitting an offer. Negligence in preparing an offer confers no right of withdrawal after due date and time. Offerors are strongly encouraged to:

A. Consider applicable laws and/or economic conditions that may affect cost, progress, performance, or furnishing of the products or services.

B. Study and carefully correlate Offeror’s knowledge and observations with the solicitation and other related data.

C. Promptly notify the City of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Offeror has discovered in or between the solicitation and other related documents.

D. The City does not reimburse the cost of developing, presenting or providing any response to this solicitation. Offers submitted for consideration should be prepared simply and economically, providing adequate information in a straightforward and concise manner. The Offeror is responsible for all costs incurred in responding to this solicitation. All materials and documents submitted in response to this solicitation become the property of the City and will not be returned.

E. Offerors are reminded that the specifications stated in the solicitation are the minimum level required and that offers submitted must be for products or services that meet or exceed the minimum level of all features specifically listed in this solicitation. Offers https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix https://www.phoenix.gov/procure offering less than any minimum specifications or criteria specified are not responsive and should not be submitted.

F. Offer responses submitted for products considered by the seller to be acceptable alternates to the brand names or manufacturer’s catalog references specified herein must be submitted with technical literature and/or detailed product brochures for the

City’s use to evaluate the products offered. Offers submitted without this product information may be considered as non-responsive and rejected. The City will be the sole judge as to the acceptability of alternate products offered.

G. Prices will be submitted on a per unit basis by line item, when applicable. In the event of a disparity between the unit price and extended price, the unit price will prevail unless obviously in error.

2.3. Fixed Offer Price Period

All offers shall be firm and fixed for a period of 180 calendar days from the solicitation opening date.

2.4. Exceptions

Offeror must not take any exceptions to any terms, conditions or material requirements of this solicitation. Offers submitted with exceptions may be deemed non-responsive and disqualified from further consideration in the City’s sole discretion. Offerors must conform to all the requirements specified in the solicitation. The City encourages Offerors to send inquiries to the

Procurement Officer rather than including exceptions in their Offer.

2.5. Inquiries

All questions that arise relating to this solicitation should be directed via City’s OpenGov

Procurement Portal and must be received by the due date indicated in the Schedule of Events.

The City will not consider questions received after the deadline.

No informal contact initiated by Offerors on the proposed service will be allowed with members of City’s staff from date of distribution of this solicitation until after city council awards the contract. All questions concerning or issues related to this solicitation must be presented in writing.

The Procurement Officer will answer written inquiries in an addendum and publish any addenda on the City’s OpenGov Procurement Portal.

2.6. Addenda

The City of Phoenix will not be responsible for any oral instructions made by any employees or officers of the City of Phoenix regarding this solicitation. Any changes will be in the form of an addendum. The Offeror must acknowledge receipt of any/all addenda through the City's

Procurement Portal.

2.7. Business in Arizona

The City will not enter contracts with Offerors (or any company(ies)) not granted authority to transact business, or not in good standing, in the state of Arizona by the Arizona Corporation

Commission, unless the Offeror asserts a statutory exception prior to entering a contract with the City.

2.8. Licenses

If required by law for the operation of the business or work related to this Offer, Offeror must possess all valid certifications and/or licenses as required by federal, state or local laws at the time of submittal.

2.9. Certifications

By signature in the Offer section of the Offer and Acceptance page(s), Offeror certifies:

• The submission of the Offer did not involve collusion or other anti-competitive practices.

• The Offeror must not discriminate against any employee, or applicant for employment in violation of Federal or State Law.

• The Offeror has not given, offered to give, nor intends to give at any time hereafter, any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, or service to a public servant in connection with the submitted Offer.

2.10. Submission of Offer

Offers must be in possession of the Department on or prior to the exact time and date indicated in the Schedule of Events. Late offers will not be considered. The prevailing clock will be the

City Department’s clock.

Offers should be submitted electronically via the City’s e-Procurement Portal by clicking on

“Draft Response” via https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/162225. Offerors that are unable to submit electronically should contact the Procurement Officer to discuss the logistics of hard copy submittals. Offerors must be registered with OpenGov by signing up via https://procurement.opengov.com/signup. Vendor training guides can be found at: https://opengov.my.site.com/support/s/article/ca6d1285-1e48-4a21-bb0d-715edb7794ed

Any original documents (such as bonds, guaranties, powers of attorney), if required by the solicitation, must be separately delivered to and received by the City on or prior to the exact time and date indicated in the Schedule of Events, with a clear indication of the Offer for which it is attributed.

It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that the Offer is timely and to confirm that there are no technical reasons that any offer submitted electronically may be delayed. The date and time on the upload as received/stamped by the City’s e-Procurement Portal will provide proof of submission and verification whether the Offer was received on or prior to the exact time and date indicated in the Schedule of Events.

For assistance with submittals, vendors are welcome to use the OpenGov support chat (blue chat bubble in the bottom right corner) to connect with a member of OpenGov's support team who will be able to assist you with your submission.

Please DO NOT submit links to Google Docs, Dropbox Paper, or similar services. Your offer may be deemed non-responsive if your offer is supplied utilizing these services.

https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/162225 https://procurement.opengov.com/signup https://opengov.my.site.com/support/s/article/ca6d1285-1e48-4a21-bb0d-715edb7794ed

2.11. Withdrawal of Offer

At any time prior to the solicitation due date and time, an Offeror (or designated representative) may withdraw the Offer by clicking “Unsubmit Response” on the Offer submission via the City’s

Procurement Portal.

2.12. Offer Results

Offers will be opened on the offer due date, time and location indicated in the Schedule of

Events, at which time the name of each Offeror, and the prices may be read. Offers and other information received in response to the solicitation will be shown only to authorized City personnel having a legitimate interest in them or persons assisting the City in the evaluation.

Offers are not available for public inspection until after the City has posted the award recommendation on the City’s website.

The City will post a preliminary offer tabulation on the Solicitation's Public Page:

https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/162225 within five business days of the offer opening. The City will post the information on the preliminary tabulation as it was read during the offer opening. The City makes no guarantee as to the accuracy of any information on the preliminary tabulation. Once the City has evaluated the offers, the City will post an award recommendation on the website. By signing and submitting its Offer, each Offeror agrees that this posting of the award recommendation to the City’s website effectively serves as the

Offeror’s receipt of that notice of award recommendation. The City has no obligation to provide any further notification to unsuccessful Offerors.

2.13. Pre-Award Qualifications

Offeror must have been in operation a minimum of ten years. The Offeror’s normal business activity during the past ten years will have been for providing the goods or services in this solicitation.

Upon notification of an intent to award, the Offeror will have ten calendar days to submit a complete certificate of insurance in the minimum amounts and the coverages as required in the

Insurance Requirements of this agreement. Insurance requirements are non-negotiable.

2.14. Certificates of Insurance

Upon notification of a recommended award, the Offeror will have 14 calendar days to submit a complete certificate of insurance in the minimum amounts and the coverages as required in the

Insurance Requirements of this solicitation. Insurance requirements are non-negotiable.

2.15. Award of Contract

Unless otherwise indicated, award(s) will be made to the most responsive, responsible

Offeror(s) who are regularly established in the service, or providing the goods, contained in this solicitation and who have demonstrated the ability to perform in an acceptable manner.

A. Factors that may be considered by the City include:

1. Technical capability of the Offeror to accomplish the scope of work required in the

Solicitation. This may include performance history on past and current government or industrial contracts; and, https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/162225

2. Demonstrated availability of the necessary manpower (both supervisory and operational personnel) and necessary equipment to accomplish the scope of work in the Solicitation; and,

3. Safety record; and,

4. Offeror history of complaints and termination for convenience or cause.

B. Notwithstanding any other provision of this solicitation, the City reserves the right to: (1) waive any immaterial defect or informality; or (2) reject any or all offers or portions thereof; or (3) reissue a solicitation.

C. A response to a solicitation is an offer to contract with the City based upon the terms, conditions, and specifications contained in the City’s solicitation. Offers do not become contracts until they are executed by the Chief Procurement Officer or Department

Director. A contract has its inception in the award, eliminating a formal signing of a separate contract. For that reason, all of the terms, conditions and specifications of the procurement contract are contained in the solicitation, and in any addendum or contract amendment.

2.16. Solicitation Transparency Policy

Commencing on the date and time a solicitation is published, potential or actual Offerors or respondents (including their representatives) shall only discuss matters associated with the solicitation with the Mayor, any members of City Council, the City Manager, any Deputy City

Manager, or any department director directly associated with the solicitation (including in each case their assigned staff, except for the designated Procurement Officer) at a public meeting, posted under Arizona Statutes, until the resulting contract(s) are awarded to all offers or responses are rejected and the solicitation is cancelled without any announcement by the

Procurement Officer of the City’s intent to reissue the same or similar solicitation.

As long as the solicitation is not discussed, Offerors may continue to conduct business with the

City and discuss business that is unrelated to the solicitation with the City staff. Offerors may not discuss the solicitation with any City employees or evaluation panel members.

Offerors may discuss their proposal or the solicitation with the Mayor or one or more members of the Phoenix City Council, provided such meetings are scheduled through the Procurement

Officer, and are posted as open meetings with the City Clerk at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meetings. The City Clerk will be responsible for posting the meetings. The posted notice shall identify the participants and the subject matter, as well as invite the public to participate.

With respect to the selection of the successful Offerors, the City Manager and/or City Manager's

Office will continue the past practice of exerting no undue influence on the process. In all solicitations of bids and proposals, any direction on the selection from the City Manager and/or

City Manager's Office and Department Head (or representative) to the proposal review panel or selecting authority must be provided in writing to all prospective Offerors.

This policy is intended to create a level playing field for all Offerors, assure that contracts are awarded in public, and protect the integrity of the selection process. OFFERORS THAT

VIOLATE THIS POLICY SHALL BE DISQUALIFIED. After official Notice is received by the City for disqualification, the Offeror may follow the Protest process, unless the Solicitation is cancelled without notice of intent to re-issue.

“To discuss” means any contact by the Offeror, regardless of whether the City responds to the contact. Offerors that violate this policy will be disqualified until the resulting contract(s) are awarded, or all offers or responses are rejected and the solicitation is cancelled without any announcement by the Procurement Officer of the City’s intent to reissue the same or a similar solicitation. The City interprets the policy as continuing through a cancellation of a solicitation until Council award of the contract, as long as the City cancels with a statement that the City will rebid the solicitation.

2.17. Protest Process

Offeror may protest the contents of a solicitation no later than seven days before the solicitation deadline when the protest is based on an apparent alleged mistake, impropriety or defect in the solicitation. Protests filed regarding the solicitation may be addressed by an amendment to the solicitation or denied by the City. If denied, the opening and award will proceed unless the City determines that it is in the City’s best interests to set new deadlines, amend the solicitation, cancel or re-bid.

Therefore, unless otherwise notified by a formal amendment, the Protester must adhere to all solicitation dates and deadlines, including timely filing of an offer, regardless of filing a protest.

Offeror may protest an adverse determination issued by the City regarding responsibility and responsiveness, within seven days of the date the Offeror was notified of the adverse determination.

Offeror may protest an award recommendation if the Offeror can establish that it had a substantial chance of being awarded the contract and will be harmed by the recommended award. The City will post recommendations on the City’s website to award the contract(s) to an

Offeror(s). Offeror must submit award protests within seven days after the posting of the award recommendation, with exceptions only for good cause shown, within the City’s full and final discretion.

All protests will be in writing, filed with the Procurement Officer identified in the solicitation and include the following:

• Identification of the solicitation number;

• The name, address and telephone number of the protester;

• A detailed statement describing the legal and factual grounds for the protest, including copies of relevant documents;

• The form of relief requested; and

• The signature of the protester or its authorized representative.

The Procurement Officer will render a written decision within a reasonable period after the protest is filed. The City will not request City Council authorization to award the contract until the protest process is complete. All protests and appeals must be submitted in accordance with the

City’s Procurement Code, (Phoenix City Code, Ch. 43) and any protests or appeals not submitted within the time requirements will not be considered. Protests must be filed with the

Procurement Officer.

2.18. Public Record

All Offers submitted in response to this solicitation will become the property of the City and become a matter of public record available for review pursuant to Arizona State law. If an

Offeror believes that a specific section of its Offer response is confidential, the Offeror will isolate the pages marked confidential in a specific and clearly labeled section of its Offer response. An Offeror may request specific information contained within its Offer is treated by the

Procurement Officer as confidential provided the Offeror clearly labels the information

“confidential.” To the extent necessary for the evaluation process, information marked as

“confidential” will not be treated as confidential. Once the procurement file becomes available for public inspection, the Procurement Officer will not make any information identified by the

Offerors as “confidential” available to the public unless necessary to support the evaluation process or if specifically requested in accordance with applicable public records law. When a public records request for such information is received, the Procurement Officer will notify the

Offeror in writing of any request to view any portion of its Offer marked “confidential.” The

Offeror will have the time set forth in the notice to obtain a court order enjoining such disclosure.

If the Offeror does not provide the Procurement Officer with a court order enjoining release of the information during the designated time, the Procurement Officer will make the information requested available for inspection.

2.19. Late Offers

Late Offers must be rejected, except for good cause. If a late Offer is submitted, the Department will document the date and time of the submittal of the late Offer, keep the Offer and notify the

Offeror that its Offer was disqualified for being a late Offer.

2.20. Right to Disqualify

The City reserves the right to disqualify any Offeror who fails to provide information or data requested or who provides materially inaccurate or misleading information or data. The City further reserves the right to disqualify any Offeror on the basis of any real or apparent conflict of interest that is disclosed by the Offer submitted or any other data or information available to the

City. This disqualification is at the sole discretion of the City. By submission of a solicitation response, the Offeror waives any right to object now or at any future time, before any agency or body including, but not limited to, the City Council of the City or any court as to the exercise by the City of such right to disqualify or as to any disqualification by reason of real or apparent conflict of interest determined by the City. The City reserves the right to replace the disqualified

Offeror.

2.21. Contract Award

The City reserves the right to award a contract by individual line items, by group, all or none, or any other combination most advantageous to the City. The City reserves the right to award multiple contracts.

2.22. Determining Responsiveness and Responsibility

Offers will be reviewed for documentation of minimum qualifications, completeness, and compliance with the Solicitation requirements. The City reserves sole discretion to determine responsiveness and responsibility.

Responsiveness: Nonresponsive Offers will not be considered in the evaluation process. The solicitation states criteria that determine responsiveness, and the solicitation includes terms and conditions that if included or excluded from Offers (as the case may be) will render an Offer nonresponsive.

Exceptions, conditions, reservations, or understandings are presumed to be unacceptable, and an Offer that includes unacceptable exceptions, conditions, reservations, or understandings may be rejected as nonresponsive. Alternatively, the City in its sole discretion may instruct in writing that any Offeror remove the conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings. If the Offeror fails to do so in writing, the City may determine the Offer to be nonresponsive.

Responsibility: To obtain true economy, the City must conduct solicitations to minimize the possibility of a subsequent default by the Contractor, late deliveries, or other unsatisfactory performance that may result in additional administrative costs. It is important that the Offeror be a responsible Contractor. Responsibility includes the Offeror’s integrity, skill, capacity, experience, and facilities for conducting the work to be performed.

The Procurement Officer will review each Offer to determine if the Offeror is responsible. The

City’s determination as to whether an Offeror is responsible will be based on all information furnished by the Offeror, interviews (if any), and information received from Offeror’s references, including information about Offeror’s history, terminations for convenience or cause, contract breach lawsuits or notices of claim and any other sources the City deems appropriate. Award of the Contract resulting from the solicitation will not be made until any necessary investigation, which each Offeror agrees to permit by submitting its Offer, is made by the City as it deems necessary. A review of responsibility may occur up to contract award.

The Offeror’s unreasonable failure to promptly supply information about an inquiry with respect to responsibility may be grounds for a determination of non-responsibility with respect to such

Offeror.

2.23. Equal Low Offer

Contract award will be made by putting the names of the tied vendors in a cup for a blind drawing limited to those bidders with tied offers. If time permits, the offerors involved will be given an opportunity to attend the drawing. The drawing will be witnessed by at least three persons, and the contract file will contain the names and addresses of the witnesses.

2.24. Evaluation of Competitive Sealed Offers

The City will use its discretion in applying the following processes to this solicitation. Any ties in scoring will be resolved with a best and final price request and the lowest price will prevail.

2.25. Detailed Evaluation of Offers and Determination of Competitive Range

During deliberations, the Evaluation Panel will reach a consensus score for each evaluation criterion except price. The Procurement Officer will score the price, which will be added to the overall consensus score. The overall consensus scores will determine the Offerors’ rankings and which offers are within the Competitive Range, when appropriate.

2.26. Offers Not Within the Competitive Range

The City may notify Offerors of Offers that the City determined are not in the Competitive

Range.

2.27. Discussions with Offerors in the Competitive Range

The City will notify each Offeror whose Offer is in the Competitive Range or made the ‘short list’ and provide in writing any questions or requests for clarification to the Offeror. Each Offeror so notified may be interviewed by the City and asked to discuss answers to written or oral questions or provide clarifications to any facet of its Offer. The Offerors in the competitive range may be required to provide a demonstration of their product.

Demonstrations - Offerors in the competitive range may be invited to construct a hands-on sample or presentation of their solution at the City of Phoenix. In addition, each finalist may prepare and deliver a presentation of their proposed solution based on the script developed by the evaluation panel. The City may also require a hands-on lab demonstration designed specifically for the evaluation panel. The results of the surveys will be tabulated and delivered to the evaluation team for the final review and solution selection session(s).

If an Offer in the Competitive Range contains conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings to or about any Contract or Solicitation Scope requirement, the City may discuss or negotiate the conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings during these meetings. But the City in its sole discretion may reject any and all conditions, exceptions, reservations and understandings, and the City may instruct any Offeror to remove the conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings. If the Offeror fails to do so, the City may determine the Offer is nonresponsive, and the City may revoke its determination that the Offer is in the Competitive Range.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, the City will not provide any information, financial or otherwise, to any Offeror about other Offers received in response to this solicitation. During discussions with Offerors in the Competitive Range, the City will not give Offerors specific prices or specific financial requirements that Offerors must meet to qualify for further consideration.

The City may state that proposed prices are too high with respect to the marketplace or otherwise unacceptable. Offerors will not be told of their relative rankings before Contract award.

2.28. Best and Final Offers (BAFO)

A BAFO is an option available for negotiations. Each Offeror in the Competitive Range, which is determined in the City’s sole discretion, may be afforded the opportunity to amend its Offer and make one BAFO.

If an Offeror’s BAFO modifies its initial Offer, the modifications must be identified in the BAFO.

The City will evaluate BAFOs based on the same requirements and criteria applicable to initial

Offers. The City will adjust appropriately the initial scores for criteria that have been affected by offer modifications made by a BAFO. Based on the criteria defined in the solicitation as weighted, the City will then perform final scoring and prepare final rankings.

The Evaluation Panel will recommend the Offer that is the best value and most advantageous to the City based on the evaluation criteria.

The City reserves the right to make an award to an Offeror whose Offer is the highest rated, best value, and most advantageous to the City based on the evaluation criteria, without conducting written or oral discussions with any Offeror, without negotiations, and without soliciting BAFOs.

3. Scope of Work

3.1. Claims Management Requirements

A. Contractor will collect and store ongoing electronic employee separation data to respond to unemployment claims.

B. Contractor will provide dedicated Claims Representation in the initial claims process and work with City staff to ensure timely unemployment claims management and responses.

C. Contractor will provide analysis, expert advice, guidance on determinations and appeal rights, and file appeals, if needed (at no additional charge).

Details: The Contractor will be appointed by the City to act as the City's agent and Attorney in

Fact in unemployment claim related matters. Contractor will process all initial claims, review benefit decisions, appeals, hearing preparation and representation, written arguments and briefs. Contractor will also secure pertinent information and, where appropriate, process, in a timely manner, the information and file a detailed protest of the payment and/or charging of benefits.

The City will periodically create a new database file ("Update File"). This Update File will be transmitted to Contractor using a mutually agreed electronic file transfer protocol. This file will contain the required fields of information as specified by the Contractor and agreed to by the

City on all the City's employee records. The Contractor will replace the old database with the new database and update the pay history information following receipt of the updated database from the City. The City's support will be available Monday through Friday during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. local Arizona time) and available via voice message after normal business hours.

3.2. Hearing Representation Requirements

A. Contractor will provide a dedicated Hearing Representative to assist with case analysis, witness preparation, and document review in preparation for a hearing.

B. Contractor will provide representation during hearings. The Hearing Representative will guide the City's designated representatives through the hearing to ensure a favorable outcome (at no additional charge).

Details: All Contractor's hearing representatives will be supervised by a licensed attorney (State of Arizona). Contractor will assist with case analysis, witness preparation, and document review in preparation for a hearing. Contractor will manage the appeal process including stating appropriate arguments and filing appropriate paperwork. Contractor will attend all unemployment hearings on behalf of the City, with appropriate City personnel in attendance as needed. Contractor shall prepare City staff for the hearing in a pre-hearing conference; advise

City staff regarding hearing procedures; review all elements of the case; and examine documentation and review those elements to secure a favorable decision. Contractor will prepare all written arguments to appeal a hearing officer's decision. Where a determination is made that a decision is contrary to the facts presented, Contractor will appeal such decision in a timely manner on the City's behalf. Contractor will research precedent decisions, and a written or oral argument will be presented to the appropriate review board.

3.3. Benefit Charge Audit Requirements

A. Carefully review charges pursuant to Arizona unemployment requirements.

B. Audit and identify erroneous charges.

C. Protest and resolve any identified erroneous charges.

Details: Contractor will ensure that benefit charges are made only to current or former employees entitled to such benefits. Contractor will verify corresponding credits to the City's state accounts. As necessary, Contractor will appeal any unfavorable charge statement rulings.

Contractor will conduct regular reviews of the City's unemployment reports, including review of wage reports, payments, and verification of billing; and Contractor will file adjustment reports as required. Contractor will actively pursue protests and any refunds or credits due as a result of such protests.

3.4. Reporting Requirements

A. Provide the City with access to clear and accurate reporting of detailed activity of claims, appeals, decisions, and charges.

B. Provide access to real time data for the purposes of audits and process improvements.

Details: Contractor will provide immediate notification of the disposition of each claim.

Contractor will ensure designated City staff are updated weekly or as agreed on the status of each claim. Contractor will transmit all favorable and/or unfavorable determinations to the City through an individual claim report and, with final decisions that are unfavorable, provide any feedback to avoid future unfavorable determinations. Contractor will provide claims activity and summary reports by City cost center. Each report will include a complete, detailed listing of unemployment claims activity for the City. Each report will contain a summary listed by; "type of separation" and by protested charges/credits.

3.5. Legislative Updates

Contractor will provide the City with legislative updates and/or updates that pertain to unemployment.

3.6. Training Requirements

A. Provide in-person or webinar training to the City upon request.

B. Provide training on unemployment changes and news updates regarding federal and state tax changes.

Details: Contractor will provide training to City staff. Contractor will use claim data to improve outcomes and reduce liabilities and training curriculums will be based on Contractor's observations. City may also request training on specific subjects related to unemployment cost management. Contractor will provide the training in a format that is most convenient and impactful for the City. Contractor will have the ability to provide training in either a webinar or in-person format. Training will be scheduled at times and locations convenient for the City. Four (4) seminars per year are included in the fee for services.

3.7. Customer Service Requirements

Contractor will provide a "Dedicated Claim Specialist" who will maintain a work schedule of

Monday through Friday, with hours that align with the City’s needs. All messages received during regular business hours will be responded to within 30 minutes. All messages received during non-business hours will be responded to within 4 hours of the opening of the next business day. The Dedicated Claim Specialist will return all phone calls within 4 hours, the day on which they receive the message. The Dedicated Claim Specialist will have extensive work experience with reimbursors as well as claim activity in the State of Arizona; and, the Dedicated

Claim Specialist will have a workload that will allow them to provide effective and prompt responses to all required tasks.

3.8. Data Backup Requirements

The Contractor shall provide an annual Disaster Recovery Action Plan that outlines that year's disaster recovery implementation schedule, and the most recent Disaster Recovery Action Plan should be available to the City upon request. City may appoint a representative(s) that shall have access to the Contractor's disaster recovery status update meetings. Disaster recovery will be performed on a best-efforts basis and the Contractor will provide communication available to the City as to the status of the recovery process.

3.9. Data Security Requirements

A. Contractor to provide secure, encrypted, web-based authentication and access using

SAML authentication.

B. Solution to include SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) at minimum 256-bit encryption for data transmission.

C. Contractor to provide a formal security incident response process as part of this process which includes responding to security incidents and notifying customers proactively during the incidents (i.e. quantify using SLA’s, timeframes, and root cause analysis).

D. Contractor to notify the city upon security vulnerability alerts within 8-hours of discovery. Contractor to provide support and remediate the vulnerabilities within (1) business day.

4. Offer Evaluation Criteria

In accordance with the Administrative Regulation 3.10, Competitive Sealed Proposal awards shall be made to the responsive and responsible Offeror(s) whose Offer is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the City based upon the evaluation criteria listed below.

The evaluation factors are listed in the relative order of importance and more details are provided in Scope of Work. The following evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate all Offers:

Phase 1

No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points)

1. Method of Approach - Implementation

Q1

The implementation timeline is very tight for both services and must be completed by April 15, 2026. Will your firm be able to meet this deadline with full cooperation from the City?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

2. Method of Approach - Implementation

Q2

Is a data file needed to provide unemployment cost management services? If so, what data is needed and how frequently are file feeds needed?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

3. Method of Approach - Implementation

Q3

Due to the short implementation timeline, the City requires Offerors to accept the

City's TXT file format. Will your firm accept this file format?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

4. Method of Approach - Implementation

Q4

Due to the highly confidential data to be shared and short implementation timelines, Contractor must not take any exceptions to any terms, conditions or material requirements of this solicitation. Offers submitted with exceptions will be deemed non-responsive and disqualified from further consideration. Please confirm that your firm understands this condition.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

5. Method of Approach - Implementation

Q5

What is the number of implementations that the implementation manager assigned to City of Phoenix will be responsible for in

2026? How will they ensure the needs of the City are met?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

6. Method of Approach - Implementation

Q6

Provide a detailed description of the implementation process and schedules for this program. Include all key personnel involved in implementation, and indicate system requirements, setup and acceptance-testing activities.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

7. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q1

How do you ensure your IT systems, processes, and environment are in compliance with applicable standards?

Describe your policies, procedure, and the attestation of your compliance.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

8. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q2

Is your disaster plan and/or business continuity plan tested annually? How are these plans tested?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

9. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q3

What steps are taken by your firm and staff to ensure the privacy and security of City of

Phoenix’s Personally Identifying

Information (PII)? What does your organization do to ensure that your staff understands and enforces these steps?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

10. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q4

Describe the preventative measures taken to secure your physical facilities.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

11. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q5

Describe how paper documents containing

PII are maintained in a secure environment, tracked and destroyed when no longer needed.

12. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q6

How do you control the addition of USB devices to your workstations and network?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

13. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q7

Is PII data encrypted in transit (while being transmitted) and at rest (while on your storage devices)?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

14. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q8

Describe your procedures for limiting PII data access to only authorized individuals, including password policies.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

15. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q9

How do you manage business associates

(third parties) that provide IT services?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

16. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q10

Do you have a written risk management policy? Does it include an annual review by senior management?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

17. Method of Approach - IT/Security Q11

Is there an audit trail of all access to PII data?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

18. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q1

Describe your organization’s overall approach to providing efficient unemployment cost management services?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

19. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q2

Describe your organization's claims review process from initial claims receipt through legal decision. Describe your expectation of City staff involvement.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

20. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q3

Will your organization provide a dedicated claims specialist? Please identify the work days and hours of the claims specialist.

What is the standard response time to employer inquiries?

21. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q4

Does your firm employ attorneys to handle cases that go to hearing? If so, how many attorneys are on staff?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

22. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q5

If your firm does not employ attorneys to handle cases that go hearing, identify by position title the staff who represent employers at hearing.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

23. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q6

If attorneys are not employed by the firm but represent employers at hearings, what criteria are used to hire outside counsel?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

24. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q7

What would the proposed service delivery model be for ongoing support for City of

Phoenix? Will the same team responsible for implementation also form the basis for the ongoing service delivery team?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

25. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q8

Describe your online capabilities and what information is available through an employer portal.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

26. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q9

What is the standard time frame to upload the file feed?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

27. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q10

What is the standard response time during customer service center hours?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

28. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q11

How does the firm ensure the standard response time is met?

29. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q12

How many days is your typical response time from receipt of the initial claim from the state?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

30. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q13

Describe your typical communication with an employer during an appeal process.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

31. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q14

Describe how you handle benefit charge audits. How does your firm communicate audit findings to the employer and how are corrections handled?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

32. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q15

How do you keep the employer informed about legislative updates relating to unemployment?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

33. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q16

How frequently does your firm conduct trainings for employers and provide the topics?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

34. Method of Approach - Service Delivery

Q17

Confirm that only the last four digits of a social security number will be displayed on any response.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

35. Method of Approach - Reporting Q1

Describe and provide sample reports which are available on the employer portal to include claims activity, appeals, decisions, charges, and cost savings.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

36. Method of Approach - Reporting Q2

Include samples of the standard reports, frequency of routine reporting, and availability on the employer portal.

37. Method of Approach - Reporting Q3

Include samples of the non-standard reports that are available to the employer.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

38. Method of Approach - Reporting Q4

Include samples of performance standards reports available to the City.

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

39. Method of Approach - Reporting Q5

May the client obtain custom and/or ad hoc reports? If yes, what is the cost for the reports?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

40. Method of Approach - Reporting Q6

What is the guaranteed turnaround time for the report requests?

0-5 Points 11 (1.5% of Total)

41. Method of Approach - Reporting Q7

How do you notify the City of the disposition of claims?

0-5 Points 10 (1.3% of Total)

42. Qualifications and Experience - Q1

Where is your headquarters located?

Please list the cities and states of the customer service centers.

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

43. Qualifications and Experience - Q2

Identify any overseas offices by location and function.

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

44. Qualifications and Experience - Q3

How many years has the company been in the business of providing unemployment cost management services?

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

45. Qualifications and Experience - Q4

What are the total number of company employees?

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

46. Qualifications and Experience - Q5

Is your company public or privately held?

What other lines of business/services are offered?

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

47. Qualifications and Experience - Q6

Provide the hours of operation for the customer service centers.

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

48. Qualifications and Experience - Q7

Confirm an online application service provider software system is available 24/7 to receive all verification requests. Is any hard copy support needed in addition to information entered online?

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

49. Qualifications and Experience - Q8

What are the three biggest points of value that differentiates your organization from others who do this work in the marketplace? Tell us why you think these are key differentiators.

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

50. Qualifications and Experience - Q9

Provide the total number of employer clients who have more than 10,000 employees.

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

51. Qualifications and Experience - Q10

Describe your firm's experience and qualifications for providing services to public and private organizations of a size similar to the City.

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

52. Qualifications and Experience - Q11

Identify the average number of cases per year for the last five years and the percentage of cases with outcomes that were favorable for the employer.

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

53. Qualifications and Experience - Q12

Has the Offeror ever had a contract terminated for convenience or cause, a contract breach lawsuit or notices of claim?

If yes, please provide the details.

0-5 Points 25 (3.3% of Total)

Phase 2

No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points)

1. Pricing Proposal

See Section 11. Pricing Proposal.

Reward Low Cost 250 (100% of Total)

5. Standard Terms and Conditions

5.1. Definition of Key Words Used in the Solicitation

Shall, Will, Must: Indicates a mandatory requirement.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .