UD EconImpact SOW final09052023.pdf.pdf

General Services Administration Public Buildings Service

Center for Urban Development (PAD)

RFQ#PAD-2023-002

Statement of Work:

Estimating Economic

Impacts from Building Operations

September 5, 2023

Estimating Economic Impacts from Building Operations

Statement of Work (SOW)

1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose

The General Services Administration (GSA) is seeking contracted services to develop a streamlined model for estimating the economic impacts associated with Federal office operations.

The procurement is being requested by the Center for Urban Development in GSA’s Public Buildings Service (PBS), 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC.

1.2 Objective + Background

GSA is seeking the development of a simple and repeatable methodology to estimate the economic activity associated with Federal office occupancies. The purpose of the model is to help inform GSA decision making and discussions with local governments about the economic activity generated by Federal building occupancy and operation. The methodology is not intended to provide precision in estimating impacts, but rather it must provide accuracy sufficient to make meaningful comparisons between existing or proposed occupancies.

The methodology must focus on general purpose facilities (e.g., not laboratories or land ports);

rely upon industry benchmarks and knowledge of existing studies rather than empirical research;

and it must be repeatable by GSA staff using a small number of readily available inputs.

GSA-supplied inputs to the model at the facility level may include number of employees, building level payroll, building maintenance costs, lease payments, visitor numbers, and similar readily available indicators. Other relevant inputs to support the model may include, at the Offerors recommendation, various industry benchmarks for retail spending, input/output models for building operation activities, and the like.

As one example of how GSA hopes to use the model, GSA envisions that the methodology would enable it to estimate the amount of local restaurant spending that would be generated by a specific Federal office building using a combination of GSA supplied inputs (e.g., employee and visitor counts, payroll information), contractor identified benchmarks that are readily available (e.g., office working spending patterns, retail trade area information, % of payroll for midday meals), and other relevant factors.

At the conclusion of this work, GSA would have a readily deployable model that would enable it to look at specific Federal locations and estimate the volume and nature of ‘out of pocket’ area spending by employees and visitors, activity generated by business-to-business transactions, and area impacts from building operations contracts, etc. Using instructions prepared by the GSA staff could use the model to collect relevant data and develop rough order of magnitude estimates for a specific building within 30 calendar days.

Ideally, the methodology would provide meaningful data for both Federally owned and leased occupancies. This effort is not intended to address construction phase impacts.

2.0 Scope of Work

Summary scope of work is as follows:

1. Literature Review. Review of relevant literature, industry benchmarks/consumer spending patterns, and completed studies.

2. GSA Data Assessment. Review of available GSA building-level data that would support development of a model.

3. Draft Methodology. Development of draft methodology using readily available data

4. Model Refinement. Refine model/methodology.

5. Final Report. Final report explaining model’s application and appropriate usage.

3.0 Specific Requirements for Tasks

3.1 Task 1: Literature Review + Assessment of GSA Building Level Data

3.1.1 Contractor shall hold a 2-hour kickoff meeting with the GSA team. The meeting’s purpose is to ensure clarity of next steps, including the Contractor’s strategy for conducting the literature search and GSA’s strategy for identifying internal building-level data.

3.1.2 Contractor shall review relevant economic impact analysis literature, industry benchmarks/consumer spending patterns, completed studies, etc. and summarize those that are potentially suitable to support this effort.

3.1.3 Contractor shall advise on the suitability of GSA building-level data provided by GSA to support an impact model. Data may include cost, occupancy, and space data from building income/expense statements, housing plans, and other internal sources.

3.1.4 Contractor shall provide an informal written report assessing relevant industry data/benchmarks and the available building-level GSA data. Purpose of the report is to briefly assess the viability of developing the desired model with available data. If necessary, the report shall identify data gaps and advise on ways to surmount those gaps.

3.1.5 Deliverable for Task 1. The report described above shall be a brief and informal report for internal GSA use. The report is assumed to be from 3-6 pages, as needed to clearly describe the strategy, data sources, and any recommended actions to improve the model.

The kickoff meeting described above is due within 10 work days of notice to proceed. The written report is due within 45 calendar days of notice to proceed.

3.2 Task 2: Draft Methodology

3.2.1 Contractor shall propose a model/methodology based on the findings of the above described report. The methodology shall use the identified data points (both industry and GSA sourced data), and the draft methodology must explain how GSA would use the model on future analysis including methods to access the data, as appropriate.

3.2.2 The draft methodology need not have extreme precision but must provide economic impact estimates sufficient to compare building impacts. The model must be repeatable by GSA staff. It is expected that the model would be populated with just 5 - 10 data inputs, using readily available data and non-proprietary software (e.g., a spreadsheet application).

3.2.3 Deliverable for Task 2. The draft model must be explained in a brief summary (2-4 pages) that outlines the approach and method to populate the model with data. If the model makes use of mathematical formulas, the formulas must be able to be run in a standard software application (e.g., spreadsheet). The model description must include a brief assessment of the model’s applicability and a rough assessment of its accuracy in practice.

Deliverable includes a 1-hour meeting with the GSA team to review the deliverable and discuss potential refinements. Expectation is that GSA would have five (5) workdays to review the deliverables prior to the meeting.

The draft model and meeting is due within 60 calendar days of notice to proceed.

3.3 Task 3: Refinement of Methodology + Report

3.3.1 Contractor shall present a refined methodology based on GSA feedback from Task 2 and, if necessary, additional research needed to refine the model.

3.3.2 Contractor shall provide sample analyses of two (2) to three (3) GSA locations and a brief assessment of how the model applies to different contexts. At least one of the sample analyses must be of a leased location.

3.3.3 Contractor shall conduct a 1-hour meeting with GSA to discuss the refined methodology.

GSA shall provide verbal feedback on the refined methodology. Expectation is that GSA would have five (5) workdays to review the deliverables prior to the meeting.

3.3.4 Deliverable for Task 3. Contractor shall provide an updated summary of the methodology (i.e., an update of the deliverable from Task 2).

Due 90 calendar days after notice to proceed.

3.4 Task 4: Final Methodology + Report

3.4.1 Contractor shall provide a final report that updates/refines the previous deliverables, as appropriate. Submitted materials (summary report and model) are intended for internal GSA use.

3.4.1 Deliverable for Task 4. Contractor shall provide a final report, consisting mainly of updated content of the previously submitted deliverables, namely, the assessment of suitable data inputs (from Task 1) and the description of the model (from Task 2/3)

Due 120 calendar days after notice to proceed.

4.0 Labor Requirements

GSA will allow the Offeror to propose the proper labor mix and level of effort they feel is the best fit to this requirement.

5.0 Deliverables

Deliverables acceptance will be subject to Government review of documentation. The Government will review and comment on all draft and deliverables within 10 working days of receipt, unless specified differently below. Acceptance or rejection of deliverables shall be made by the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) in writing, giving the specific reason(s) for the rejection. The Contractor shall correct the rejected deliverable and return it on the date specified by the COR. While deliverables are under review, Contractors will continue work on follow-on activities to maintain the project schedule. All deliverables under this contract become Government property and are able to be publicly released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), unless the Contractor marks them proprietary, and the Government concurs.

5.1 Schedule of Deliverables

The Contractor shall deliver the following deliverables consistent with the listed task(s):

Task Number Deliverable/ Format Time Frame

Task 1 Kick off meeting as described in Task Within 10 calendar day from notice to proceed

(NTP)

Task 1 Brief and informal report as described in Task for internal GSA use -Word document (3-6 pages, as needed) above shall be a brief and informal report for internal GSA use. The report is assumed to be from 3-6 pages, as needed.

Selection of two sites for analysis with rationale- Word document (max one page total)

Within 45 calendar days from NTP

Task 2A Draft model and model description.

● If the model makes use of mathematical formulas, the formulas must be able to be run in a standard software application (e.g., spreadsheet).

● Model Description explained in a brief summary that outlines the approach and method to populate the model with data.

Model description must include a brief assessment of the model’s applicability and a rough assessment of its accuracy in practice Word Document (2-4 pages).

5 business days to prior to the meeting in Task 2B

Task 2B 1-hour meeting with the GSA team to review the deliverable and discuss potential refinements.

Within 60 calendar days of NTP

Task 3B Updated model and model description from Task 2 90 calendar days from

NTP

Task 4 Final Report of updated content previously submitted

● Assessment of suitable data inputs (from Task 1)

● Updated model and model description (from Task 3)

120 days from NTP

6.0 Place and Period of Performance

There is no prescribed place of performance for the work. If the selected contractor is based in the Washington DC area, we would expect that the kickoff meeting would be held in-person.

Remaining meetings, and all meetings for contractors outside this area, would be held virtually.

The period of performance for this contract shall be a total of 4.5 months from the date the project is approved and notice to proceed (NTP) is issued to the contractor.

Base period: 9/25/2023 – 2/15/2024

7.0 Travel

No travel is anticipated as a result of this requirement. If travel is required based on this contract, the Government will negotiate travel expenses and authorize the travel in writing prior to the occurrence of travel. The Government will reimburse the Contractor for all travel expenses in accordance with the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR). Travel expenses shall be submitted on an incident basis. Local travel is not reimbursable. Local travel shall be considered within fifty

(50) miles of the GSA Headquarters.

8.0 Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)/ Government Furnished Information

(GFI)

There is no anticipated use of Government equipment necessary for Contractor personnel to complete the task and deliverables nor would there be need to access GSA networks. Data transfer would be managed via regular inter-office email, adhering to GSA standard for sharing of personally identifiable information (PII). Note, however, that no need to share PII is anticipated. Any GSA-specific data or information that might be shared with the contractor for the sole purpose to execute the tasks under this contract may not be shared in any format (viewing demos, databases, presentations, etc.) or under any circumstance without the expressed written consent of the Center for Urban Development Program.

9.0 Security

The Contractor is not expected to need access to Federal facilities or IT systems. The sole exception would be if GSA elects to have in-person meetings at a GSA facility. In that case, Contractor staff would adhere to GSA standards for managing visitors through building screening, entry, and escort.

9.1 Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-12) and Background Investigations Requirements

Due to the processes described above, HSPD-12 screening, and background investigations would not be required.

9.2 Contractor Staff Reporting Requirement

The Contractor shall maintain a Contractor Staff Roster and be made available to the Contracting Officer / Contracting Officer Representative within 2 workdays of written request. The roster shall minimally contain the full name of each active employee assigned to this task.

9.3 Privacy Act

Work on this contract will require personnel to have access to Privacy Information. Personnel shall adhere to the Privacy Act, Title 5 of the U.S. Code, Section 552a and applicable agency rules and regulations.

9.4 Protection of Information

Any GSA-specific data or information that might be shared with the contractor for the sole purpose to execute the tasks under this contract may not be shared in any format (viewing demos, databases, presentations, etc.) or under any circumstance without the expressed written consent of the Center for Urban Development Program.

This includes, but is not limited to building occupancy, building maintenance costs, lease costs, payroll, visitor numbers, etc.

The Contractor shall be responsible for properly protecting all information used, gathered, or developed as a result of work under the contract. In addition, the Contractor shall protect all government data or information by treating the material as sensitive. SBU information, data, and/or equipment shall only be disclosed to authorize personnel. The Contractor shall ensure that appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards are established to ensure the security and confidentiality of this information, data, and/or equipment is properly protected.

When no longer required, this information, data, and/or equipment shall be returned to Government control, destroyed, or held until otherwise directed. Items returned to the Government will be hand carried or mailed to the COR using certified mail. The Contractor shall destroy unneeded items by burning, shredding, or any other method that precludes the reconstruction of the material.

9.5 Non-Disclosure Agreements

If determined to be required by the CO, Contractor, and their personnel shall be required to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).

9.6 Organizational Conflict of Interest

FAR Subpart 9.5, Organizational Conflicts of Interest, applies. If the CO determines that an offeror may have a potential organizational conflict of interest, then the Contractor shall be required to submit a mitigation plan and, if awarded, comply with any procedures put in place to avoid or mitigate conflicts.

10.0 .0 Administration 10.1 GSA Electronic Invoicing

All invoicing shall be done electronically. Password and electronic invoice access shall be obtained through GSA web site http://www.finance.gsa.gov. Invoices shall be itemized as per the specific line items utilized during that billing period.

Billing and payment shall be accomplished in accordance with this paragraph. The Contractor shall have the invoice certified by the client representative. The Contractor’s invoice shall be for no less than one month. The Contractor shall invoice only for the hours, travel, and/or unique services ordered by GSA and actually used in direct support of the client representative’s project.

A copy of the Government’s document (receiving report) accepting the covered services shall accompany invoices submitted for payment. A copy of the invoice shall be submitted via email to the Government PM, along with the monthly status reports, at the same time that it is submitted for payment. Failure to comply with the procedures outlined above shall result in your payment being delayed.

The Contractor shall submit with a GSA Form 1142- Release of Claims with submission of the final invoice at the end of the period of performance. A copy of the form should be sent via email to the Contracting Officer identified in Block 26A of the award document (GSA Form

10.2 Inspection and Acceptance

The Government will have fifteen 10 workdays to complete the review of each deliverable and accept or reject the deliverable by giving written notice. When the Government fails to complete the review within the review period, the deliverable shall become acceptable, unless an extension of the review period is requested and mutually agreed upon. In the event of rejection of any deliverable, the Contractor shall be so notified in writing by the Government PM or CO, giving the specific reason(s) for the rejection. The Contractor shall have five (5) workdays to correct the rejected deliverable and return it to the Government PM. The Contractor shall be allowed one (1) resubmission of deliverables.

10.3 Cancellation of Orders

The Government has the right to cancel BPA Calls if the requirement is eliminated, changed, or no longer needed. The Government will notify the BPA Holder, in writing thirty (30) calendar days prior to the stop work date.

10.4 Unauthorized Commitment

The Government PM or any other client representative is not authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of the resultant BPA Calls. Changes, if any, shall be made by the CO only.

10.5 Personal Services

The Government has determined that in order to satisfy the requirements in this SOW the use of a PBS BPA is in the best interest of the Government, economic and other factors considered, and this BPA is not being used to procure personal services prohibited by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 37.104 titled "Personal Services Contract."

10. FAR/ GSAM Clauses The following FAR Clauses are made part of this procurement:

52.217-5 EVALUATIONS OF OPTIONS (JUL 1990)

Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government’s best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

52.217-8 OPTION TO EXTEND SERVICES (NOV 1999)

The Government may require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract. These rates may be adjusted only as a result of revisions to prevailing labor rates provided by the Secretary of Labor. The option provision may be exercised more than once, but the total extension of performance hereunder shall not exceed six months.

The CO may exercise the option by written notice to the Contractor within thirty calendar days prior to contract expiration.

52.217-9 OPTION TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT (MAR 2000)

a. The Government may extend the term of this contract by written notice to the Contractor within ten calendar days before the contract expires; provided that the Government gives the Contractor a preliminary written notice of its intent to extend at least thirty calendar days before the contract expires. The preliminary notice does not commit the Government to an extension.

b. If the Government exercises this option then the extended contract shall be considered to include this option clause.

c. The total duration of this contract, including the exercise of any options under this clause, shall not exceed five (5) years.

52.204-14 SERVICE CONTRACT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (JAN 2014) a.

Definition.

First-tier subcontract means a subcontract awarded directly by the Contractor for the purpose of acquiring supplies or services (including construction) for performance of a prime contract. It does not include the Contractor’s supplier agreements with contractors, such as long-term arrangements for materials or supplies that benefit multiple contracts and/or the costs of which are normally applied to a Contractor’s general and administrative expenses or indirect costs.

b. The Contractor shall report, in accordance with paragraphs (c) and (d) of this clause, annually by October 31, for services performed under this contract during the preceding Government fiscal year (October 1–September 30).

c. The Contractor shall report the following information:

1. Contract number and, as applicable, order number.

2. The total dollar amount invoiced for services performed during the previous

Government fiscal year under the contract.

3. The number of Contractor direct labor hours expended on the services performed during the previous Government fiscal year.

4. Data reported by subcontractors under paragraph (f) of this clause.

d. The information required in paragraph (c) of this clause shall be submitted via the internet at www.sam.gov. (See SAM User Guide). If the Contractor fails to submit the report in a timely manner, the contracting officer will exercise appropriate contractual remedies. In addition, the Contracting Officer will make the Contractor’s failure to comply with the reporting requirements a part of the Contractor’s performance information under FAR subpart 42.15.

e. Agencies will review Contractor reported information for reasonableness and consistency with available contract information. In the event the agency believes that revisions to the Contractor reported information are warranted, the agency will notify the Contractor no later than November 15. By November 30, the Contractor shall revise the report, or document its rationale for the agency.

f. (1) The Contractor shall require each first-tier subcontractor providing services under this contract, with subcontract(s) each valued at or above the thresholds set forth in 4.1703(a)(2), to provide the following detailed information to the Contractor in sufficient time to submit the report:

i. Subcontract number (including subcontractor name and DUNS number); and ii.

The number of first-tier subcontractor direct-labor hours expended on the services performed during the previous Government fiscal year.

iii. The Contractor shall advise the subcontractor that the information will be made available to the public as required by section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010.

11.0 Government Points of Contact

On behalf of the GSA Contracting Officer (CO), the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) is responsible for the general administration of this Work Order. The COR is responsible for the review/acceptance of all task deliverables. This individual will serve as the Government point of contact concerning invoicing, information exchange, submission review, and payment. Nothing said by the COR shall be construed to change the contract requirements unless supported in writing by the CO.

Amber Levofsky Contracting Officer Representative (COR) Center for Urban Development GSA Public Buildings Service 1800 F Street NW, Suite 5400 Washington DC 20405 Mobile:

(202) 412-2064 amber.levofsky@gsa.gov

Renee Pilone Alternate Contracting Officer Representative (ACOR)

GSA OAE (PA)

1800 F Street NW, Wash DC 20405 202-841-0601 Renee.pilone@gsa.gov

Frank Giblin/Karen Handsfield Project Leads Center for Urban Development GSA Public Buildings Service 1800 F Street NW, Suite 5400

Washington DC 20405 Mobile:

(202) 494-9236 frank.giblin@gsa.gov

12.0 Quote Submission

Offerors shall prepare and deliver technical and price quotes that shall be evaluated in determining the “best value” quote. All quotes shall be submitted via email to laurie.schimmel@gsa.gov by 1:00 pm Eastern Time (ET), Friday September 15, 2023. The price quote shall be a separate volume, .pdf attachment as well as the Excel version without formulas, from the technical volume. A minimum of four (4) electronic documents shall be submitted for this RFQ:

Technical PDF narrative volume, named (Offeror’s Name) – Technical Volume

Price PDF narrative volume, named (Offeror’s Name) – Price Volume

Price Excel template document, named (Offeror s Name) - Required Price Quote

Resumes, with each individual file labeled as, (Offeror’s Name) – Resume of (Individual Last Name)

Offerors may add on to the file names after this defined piece.

Large email attachments can be delayed during regular work hours. GSA has an attachment size limit of 20 MB. If this is a problem, submit as multiple emails with small attachments, or with enough time to clear the server delays. Quotes not time stamped in the receiving email inbox, at or earlier than the due date and time, will be late and not accepted. Any established agreements shall be included as an attachment (not included as part of the overall page count) to the technical narrative volume in order to be considered.

The Technical Narrative including Resumes shall all be delivered as electronic documents and formatted to fit on 8 1/2” by 11” paper with no less than 1” margins on all four sides of each page. The font shall be Times New Roman, and the size of all text shall not be less than 12pt.

The spacing between lines (leading) shall not be less than 1.15em (this print value is equivalent to 1.5 line spacing in Microsoft Word) or 115% of the font size. Contractor submitted graphs, tables, images, charts, etc. must use font size not less than Times Roman size 10. All material that is not originally authored by the Offeror (including images, tables or statements) shall credit in the original author (citation reference format is at the discretion of the Offeror).

Questions regarding the SOW or RFQ may be submitted to laurie.schimmel@gsa.gov, by 1:00 pm Eastern Time (ET), September 11, 2023 using the format in Attachment A - Q&A Format Template. Responses to all Offerors questions will be emailed to all Offerors as an amendment to the RFQ.

13.0 Methodology for Award

Award will be based on the best value to the Government, price and other factors considered, pursuant to FAR Section 13.

Best value evaluation is, in and of itself, a subjective assessment by the Government of the proposed solution that provides the optimal results to the Government, price and other factors considered. Subjectivity is inherent in the process and is the cornerstone of the source selection decision. In an effort to provide insight to the offerors as to the decision-making process of the Government, the following information is provided:

Evaluation will be made on three (3) technical factors – 1) Management Approach, 2) Professional Experience, and 3) Past Performance. In the evaluation, the Management Approach is significantly more important than the Professional Experience and Past Performance Factor, which are both of equal importance. Proposals not meeting all submission criteria of Section 12 will be evaluated as technically deficient. In the evaluation, the non-price evaluation factors when considered together are significantly more important than price. While price is not as important as technical, it does have significance to the Government.

In rating the technical proposals, the offeror’s technical capability and understanding of requirements will be evaluated.

The Government will perform a price/technical trade-off analysis in accordance with the above methodology and select the offer that provides the best value. The Government intends to use the trade-off process in selecting a quote that is most advantageous. The trade-off process is a method of evaluating price and other factors as specified in the RFQ to select the offer that provides the best value to the Government. The process permits trade-offs among price and technical factors. Because the trade-off process allows award to the Offerors that provides the government with the best value, it allows the government to accept other than the highest technically rated offer and other than the lowest priced offer.

The award may be made without FAR Part 8 discussions; therefore, offerors are requested to submit quotes to the Government on the most favorable terms from a technical and price standpoint.

14.0 Technical Evaluation

14.1 Technical Evaluation Factor 1: Management Approach

Offerors will be evaluated based on their plan for approaching the project, given the goals expressed in the statement of work.

Offerors must present a management approach that demonstrates that they have a sophisticated grasp on the Federal government’s goals under this statement of work, a thoughtful understanding of the Federal operating environment, and a technically sound strategy to meet those goals.

14.2 Technical Evaluation Factor 2: Professional Experience

Offerors will provide resumes for key members of the project team. Where members of the project team are not direct employees of the firm submitting the proposal, the resume must highlight the team member’s experience working with the submitting firm.

The depth and breadth of the team’s experience must be sufficient to conduct the analysis and, importantly, provide a high level of confidence in their resulting recommendations.

Subcontractors must have past experience working with the principal firm.

14.3 Technical Evaluation Factor 3: Past Performance

Offerors will be evaluated on their past performance in two ways:

1) Summaries of Past Projects. Offerors must provide at least five (5) summaries of similar work for which they consulted and developed deliverables that were germane to this statement of work. The summary must briefly (no more than one page for each project) describes each subject project site, outline the firm’s approach to the work, explain the firm’s recommendations, and summarize the outcome. Each project summary must include a client reference with name and contact info; GSA will check references as it deems necessary to gauge adequacy and relevance of past performance.

2) Work Sample. Offerors must provide at least one complete sample of an economic impact analysis model/report or recommendation that shows the firm’s ability to meet the requirement; alternatively, if such materials are unable to be shared for proprietary reasons, the firm may submit a 2-3 page case study that provides a more detailed description of their approach to the project.

15.0 Price Evaluation

This award will be a firm fixed price order. The Offeror shall submit pricing for task delineated by period of performance. GSA seeks discounts, or price reductions, from the Offeror’s pricelist rates. The Offerors’ total order price and individual Task pricing shall be evaluated and compared, including any discounts offered. GSA will evaluate the Offeror’s pricing for competitiveness, risk to the Government, and overall best value to the Government. Offerors’ pricing shall establish confidence for successful performance and completion of the SOW requirements.

The Offeror shall complete the attached Attachment B - Required Price Quote Template and shall submit the document as an individual Microsoft Excel file entitled (Offeror’s Name) - Required Price Quote.

The narrative section of the price quote shall be named (Offeror’s Name) – Price Volume.

16.0 Summary of Evaluation

The proposal font must be font style Times Roman size 12. Graphs and charts must use font size not less than 10. The evaluation will not consider any information on pages exceeding the page limitation.

Technical Quote

Page Limit and Submission Process

Submission Item Required Template

Evaluation Factor 1

Maximum of seven (7) pages in the Technical Quote Management Approach

N/A

Evaluation Factor 2

Maximum of five (5) pages in the Technical Quote (not including pages containing resumes)

Professional Experience

N/A

Evaluation Factor 2

Maximum of two (2) pages per each candidates resume, and one

(1) certification page.

Maximum of 12 pages for resumes and 4 certification pages.

Resumes

N/A

Factor 3 Maximum of five (5) pages in the Technical Quote (not including the work sample) Past Performance - 5 project briefs

N/A

Evaluation Variable length for work sample or maximum three (3) pages for case study summary

Past Performance- work sample or case study summary

Price Quote Page Limit and Submission Process

Submission Item Required Template

Price

Maximum of five (5) pages

Price Narrative N/A

Price

Excel Price Template Price Yes

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A - Q&A Template Attachment A - attached separately through an Excel file.

Attachment B - Required Price Quote Template Attachment B - attached separately through an Excel file.

Attachment B - Required Price Quote Template