Treatment_Checklist.pdf

Volume 3. Appendices B through G

Attachment - Checklist Start Date:

Project Leader:

Description of Activity:

Activity Surroundings

(Residential, agriculture, mixed use, other regulated entities):

Part A

Response Justification/Rationale

Is the proposed activity under CDFA's discretion?

Is the activity described in the PEIR?

(If the Response is “Partially” or “No” skip to Part C)

Part B

Check Applicable

Requirements

General Requirements Conduct activity as described in Chapters 2 and 3 of PEIR

Include applicable PEIR requirements in Compliance Agreements with regulated entities, based on the activities the regulated entities may conduct in response to quarantine

Activity Site Specific Review

Database Date Reviewed Mitigation If Any

California Natural Diversity Database 303(d) List of Impaired Waters

EnviroStor Hazardous Site

California Department of Food and Agriculture C-22 Sep 2016 Statewide Plant Pest Prevention and Management Program Project No. 11.001

Check Applicable

Requirements Management Practices

MP-SPRAY-1: Conduct a Site Assessment MP-SPRAY-2: Properly clean and calibrate all equipment to apply chemicals uniformly and in the correct quantities

MP-SPRAY-3: Follow pesticide application laws and regulations, and label directions

MP-SPRAY-4: Apply chemicals only under favorable weather conditions

MP-SPRAY-5: Follow integrated pest management and drift reduction techniques

MP-SPRAY-6: Clean equipment and dispose of rinse water per label directions

MP-SPRAY-7: Follow appropriate product storage procedures

MP-AERIAL-1: Use appropriate aerial spray treatment procedures

MP-GROUND-1: Follow appropriate ground-rig foliar treatment procedures

MP-GROUND-2: Follow appropriate low-pressure backpack treatment procedures

MP-GROUND-3: Train personnel in proper use of pesticides MP-GROUND-4: Enforce runoff and drift prevention

MP-HAZ-1: Implement a Spill Contingency Plan

MP-HAZ-2: Use safety and cleanup materials checklist

MP-HAZ-3: Implement decontamination

MP-HAZ-4: Follow appropriate disposal procedures

Mitigation Measures

Mitigation Measure BIO-CHEM-2: CDFA will obtain technical assistance from USFWS, CDFW and NMFS to identify site-specific buffers and other measures to protect habitats utilized by special-status species Mitigation Measure HAZ-GEN-4a: Determine Potential for Hazardous Materials Exposure

Mitigation Measure HAZ-GEN-4b: Conduct a Hazardous Materials Records Search before Beginning Proposed Program Activities at a Given Site Mitigation Measure HAZ-GEN-4c: Stop work and implement hazardous materials investigations/ remediation for contamination health risks

Mitigation Measure HAZ-CHEM-1a: Conduct Public Information Sessions Regarding Pesticide Safety Practices Mitigation Measure HAZ-CHEM-1b: Conduct Training Sessions and Prepare Educational Materials Regarding Safe Handling and Application of Pesticides Mitigation Measure HAZ-CHEM-3: Require Compliance with the Proposed Program’s Authorized Chemical Application Scenarios Mitigation Measure NOISE-PHYS-1: Conduct Activities during the Daytime

Mitigation Measure WQ-CHEM-2: Track Emerging Water Quality Standards and Implement Additional Mitigation as Appropriate Mitigation Measure WQ-CHEM-5: Require Implementation of Proposed Program MPs as Part of Compliance Agreements Mitigation Measure WQ-CUM-1: Identify whether Proposed Program Pesticide Applications May Occur in Proximity to Impaired Waterbodies, and Implement Appropriate MPs

California Department of Food and Agriculture C-23 Sep 2016

Part C

Y/N Justification/Rationale

Step 1

Is the Activity substantially similar to that considered in the

PEIR?

(If yes go to Step 2, if no move to the next question)

If a management practice that was not included in the PEIR is being considered, would it be equivalent or more effective to the management practice originally considered in the

PEIR?

(If yes go to Step 2, if no move to the next question)

If a mitigation measure that was not included in the PEIR is being considered, would it be equivalent or more effective to the mitigation measure originally considered in the

PEIR?

(If yes go to Step 2, if no move to the next question)

Would the activity result in potentially significant impacts which were not considered in the PEIR, not considered to be significant in the PEIR, or would be substantially more significant than disclosed in the

PEIR?

(If yes go to Step 3, if no go to Step 2)

Step 2 Attach supporting documentation for determination, and CEQA Addendum, as applicable

Step 3 Attach tiered CEQA document, and identify additional requirements from that document

Confirmation of Implementation (following completion of activity)

Project Leader Name:

Signature*:

End Date:

*This signature confirms that all applicable requirements identified on this checklist and related documentation has been properly implemented.

California Department of Food and Agriculture C-24 Sep 2016